Cancer Research AM No Date
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Merchant, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Mackall, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Merchant, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Mackall, C. L.
[Cancer Research 64, 8349-8356, November 15, 2004]
© 2004 American Association for Cancer Research

Regular Articles

Interferon {gamma} Enhances the Effectiveness of Tumor Necrosis Factor-Related Apoptosis–Inducing Ligand Receptor Agonists in a Xenograft Model of Ewing’s Sarcoma

Melinda S. Merchant1, Xuezhong Yang1, Fraia Melchionda1,3, Maria Romero2, Ruth Klein4, Carol J. Thiele1, Maria Tsokos2, H. Udo Kontny4 and Crystal L. Mackall1

1 Pediatric Oncology Branch and 2 Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; 3 Department of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, S. Orsola Hospital University of Bologna, Italy; and 4 Children’s Hospital of the Albert-Ludwigs University, Freiburg, Germany


   ABSTRACT
Top
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Tumor necrosis factor–related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) induces selective apoptosis in a variety of tumors, including most cell lines derived from Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors, an aggressive sarcoma that afflicts children and young adults. To determine the in vivo efficacy of TRAIL receptor agonists in Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors, mice with orthotopic xenografts were treated with anti-TRAIL-R2 monoclonal antibody or TRAIL/Apo2L in a model that can identify effects on both primary tumors and metastases. Administration of either agonist slowed tumor growth in 60% of animals and induced durable remissions in 11 to 19% but did not alter the incidence of metastatic disease. Response rates were not improved by concurrent doxorubicin treatment. Cells recovered from both TRAIL receptor agonist–treated and nontreated tumors were found to be resistant to TRAIL-induced death in vitro unless pretreated with interferon (IFN) {gamma}. This resistance coincided with a selective down-regulation of TRAIL receptor expression on tumor cells. In vivo treatment with IFN{gamma} increased tumor expression of TRAIL receptors and caspase 8, but did not increase the antitumor effect of TRAIL receptor agonists on primary tumors. However, IFN{gamma} treatment alone or in combination with a TRAIL receptor agonist significantly decreased the incidence of metastatic disease and the combination of TRAIL receptor agonist therapy with IFN{gamma}-mediated impressive effects on both primary tumors and metastatic disease. These data demonstrate that in vivo growth favors TRAIL resistance but that TRAIL receptor agonists are active in Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors and that the combination of TRAIL receptor agonists with IFN{gamma} is a potent regimen in this disease capable of controlling both primary and metastatic tumors.


   INTRODUCTION
Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Tumor necrosis factor–related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), a tumor necrosis factor family member, plays an important role in defense against viral and neoplastic disease (1, 2, 3, 4) . Although systemic toxicity has limited the therapeutic use of other members of this superfamily (Fas and tumor necrosis factor), TRAIL demonstrates a higher degree of tumor specificity, raising the prospect of clinical use of TRAIL receptor agonists as tumor-specific agents. TRAIL is a type II transmembrane protein that, after cleavage from the cell membrane, forms a zinc-coordinated homotrimer that induces caspase-dependent apoptosis through two death domain–containing receptors, TRAIL-R1 (TR1) or TRAIL-R2 (TR2; refs. 5 and 6 ). A wide variety of tumors are sensitive to TRAIL-mediated apoptosis in vitro, including cell lines established from Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors (7, 8, 9, 10) , rhabdomyosarcoma (11) , neuroblastoma (12 , 13) , osteosarcoma (14) , lymphoma (15) , leukemia (16) , melanoma (17) , and colon and breast carcinoma (3) . Interestingly, although many tumors demonstrate exquisite sensitivity to TRAIL receptor agonists in vitro, preclinical studies using TRAIL receptor agonists as single agents in in vivo tumor models have demonstrated more moderate antitumor effects (6 , 18) . As a result, several agents have been studied for their ability to enhance the antitumor effects of TRAIL receptor agonists in vivo (19, 20, 21) . Treatment of tumor-bearing animals with doxorubicin, etoposide, cisplatin, or ionizing radiation results in increased surface expression of TR1 and TR2 on tumor cells, and these agents have enhanced the in vivo effectiveness of TRAIL receptor agonists in several models presumably via this mechanism (8) . However, TRAIL resistance can also result from a variety of other changes including decreased caspase 8 expression (7 , 12) , increased nuclear factor {kappa}B activity, and up-regulation of c-FLIP (22) , to name a few. Thus, the development of rational combination therapies that can target multiple mediators of the TRAIL receptor signaling pathways is important to increase the efficacy of TRAIL receptor–based therapies.

Interferon (IFN) {gamma} exerts multiple pro-apoptotic effects on cells through JAK1 or JAK2/STAT1 signaling and subsequent induction of IFN-sensitive genes (23) . Several points of convergence have been described between IFN-sensitive genes and the TRAIL-mediated apoptosis pathway, including mediators that play a role in the TRAIL resistance described above. For example, IFN{gamma} increases the expression of apical caspases and can sensitize caspase 8–deficient, TRAIL-resistant Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors and neuroblastoma cell lines in vitro (12) . Furthermore, TR1, TR2, and TRAIL itself are among the many IFN-sensitive genes up-regulated by IFN{gamma} (24 , 25) . Thus, evidence from a variety of in vitro model systems suggests that IFN{gamma} or agents that induce its production (i.e., IL18 or IL12) might enhance sensitivity to TRAIL agonists.

The studies reported herein address the in vivo efficacy of TRAIL receptor agonists in Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors, one of several pediatric malignancies that are highly susceptible to TRAIL-based therapies in vitro (7, 8, 9, 10) . Despite exquisite in vitro sensitivity, TRAIL receptor agonists as single agents demonstrated only moderate activity in vivo. Using explants from Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors xenografts, we demonstrate that tumors growing in vivo acquire TRAIL resistance, which is associated with down-regulation of TRAIL receptors but which can be overcome using IFN{gamma}. Furthermore, combining TRAIL receptor agonist therapy with IFN{gamma} enhanced the effectiveness of both agents. These results demonstrate that acquired TRAIL resistance in vivo is an important obstacle to the clinical efficacy of TRAIL receptor agonists and that combining TRAIL receptor agonists with therapies that up-regulate intracellular mediators of the TRAIL pathway and the surface expression of death domain–containing TRAIL receptors may be critical to fully realize the clinical potential of this therapy.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cell Lines, Flow Cytometry, and Apoptosis Assays.
Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors cell lines used in this study include the previously reported lines TC71, TC32, RD-ES, 5838, A4573, EWS-925, NCI-EWS-94, NCI-EWS-95, NCI-EWS-011, and NCI-EWS-021 (26) . Cell lines were maintained in vitro in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 2 mmol/L L-glutamine, penicillin (100 U/mL)-streptomycin (100 µg/mL), and 10% fetal calf serum (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD). For apoptosis assays, cells were plated for 24 hours to allow adherence before addition of 200 µg/mL Apo2L/TRAIL (Genentech, San Francisco, CA) or 50 µg/mL anti-TR2 monoclonal antibody (mAb; M413; Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA). Cell growth was measured by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide colorimetric assay (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) at 8 to 72 hours after treatment. Viability was determined by trypan blue exclusion and by propidium iodide staining by flow cytometry. Nuclear morphology was shown by staining the cells in 10 mmol/L Hoechst33342 solution (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA) for 5 minutes at room temperature. Photomicrographs were taken on an inverted Nikon phase contrast and fluorescent microscope.

For flow cytometry, adherent cells were removed by treatment with trypsin + EDTA (Life Technologies, Inc.) and washed in fluorescence-activated cell-sorting buffer (PBS containing 2% bovine serum albumin and 0.1% NaN3). Cells (1–5 x 105) were stained with phycoerythrin-conjugated anti-DR4 or anti-DR5 (ebioscience, San Diego, CA), or fluorescein isothiocyanate–conjugated anti-CD99 (Caltag Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Apoptosis was detected by staining with annexin V fluorescein isothiocyanate and 7AAD or propidium iodide in calcium-containing buffer (Alexis Platform, Läufelfingen, Switzerland). One- or two-color immunofluorescence was performed using a FACSCalibur (Becton Dickinson, Burlington, MA) and standard techniques. A minimum of 10,000 cells were acquired and analyzed using Cell Quest software.

Immunohistochemistry.
Xenograft tumor tissues were formalin-fixed, placed in paraffin blocks, and sectioned to make individual slides. Paraffin sections of 5 µm were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in alcohol. Endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched for 10 minutes at room temperature in methanol containing 1.5% hydrogen peroxide. After washing twice with water, sections were subjected to antigen retrieval by incubation in Dako Antigen Retrieval solution (pH 6.2; Dakocytomation, Carpinteria, CA) for 15 minutes in a microwave oven. The sections were washed in PBS and incubated for 1 hour with a blocking solution consisting of 10% normal goat serum (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and 0.4% Tween 20 (Roche Diagnostics Corporation, Indianapolis, IN) in PBS at room temperature. The mouse monoclonal anti-caspase 8 antibody (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY) or primary antibodies anti-TR1 (5 µg/mL) and anti-TR2 (5 µg/mL; Immunex/Amgen, Seattle, WA) were applied at 4°C overnight 1:75. After washing, slides were incubated with goat antimouse immunoglobulins conjugated to peroxidase-labeled dextran polymer, developed with 3,3-diaminobenzidine (Dakocytomation) and counterstained with hematoxylin.

Xenograft Studies.
Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors tumor cells were expanded in vitro to 75% confluence and harvested with trypsin + EDTA, then washed twice in PBS. Two million cells were injected in 100 µL of PBS into the gastrocnemeous muscle of 4- to 12-week-old SCID/bg mice (Taconic, Germantown, NY). A single primary tumor developed in >95% of mice over the ensuing 3 to 4 weeks. Two diameters of the tumor sphere were measured every 1 to 2 days with digital calipers. The tumor volume was approximated using the formula (D x d 2/6) x {pi} (where D is the longer diameter and d is the shorter diameter). Lower extremity volumes without tumor are approximately 50 mm3. Mice were treated with Apo2L/TRAIL (50 µg/kg/d), anti-TR2 mAb (5 µg/kg/d), or HBSS alone by intraperitoneal injections at either day 7 after tumor injection or when palpable tumor reached 100 mm3. In selected experiments, higher doses of Apo2L/TRAIL (100 µg/kg/d) and anti-TR2 mAb (10 µg/kg/d) were administered. When tumors reached 1000 mm3, they were resected as described previously (26) , and animals were followed for an additional 3 to 6 months. During this period of minimal residual disease, animals were evaluated for the development of metastases in lung, bone/soft tissue, or abdomen of 75 to 100% of mice. Durable regression was defined as no evidence of tumor for >3 months. All studies were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the National Cancer Institute, and all animal care was in accordance with NIH guidelines.

RNase Protection Assays.
The RiboQuant Multi-Probe protection assay system (BD-PharMingen, Hamburg, Germany) was used according to manufacturer’s instructions to determine mRNA levels in Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors cell lines at baseline and after treatment with IFN{gamma} (2000 units/mL). An hApo3c probe set containing DNA templates for TRAIL, TR1, TR2, and caspase 8 was used for T7 polymerase direct synthesis of [{alpha}32-P]UTP-labeled antisense RNA probes. Probes were hybridized with 5 µg of RNA isolated from Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors cell lines. Samples were then digested with RNase to remove nonhybridizing, single-stranded RNA. Remaining probes were resolved on denaturing 5% polyacrylamide gels.

TRAIL R2 Transfection.
The coding sequence of TR2 cDNA was cloned into the expression vector pBSPTR1, which contains a puromycin-resistant selection marker. The expression of TR2 was driven by a tetracycline-repressible cytomegalovirus promoter (27) . The TC71 Ewing’s sarcoma cell line was transfected with pBSPTR1-TR2 using LipofectAMINE 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The transfected cells were maintained in 1.5 µg/mL tetracycline and selected in 0.4 µg/mL puromycin until isolated colonies were formed. The colonies were picked and cultured in 1.5 µg/mL tetracycline and 0.4 µg/mL puromycin for expansion. TR2-stable clones were selected by identifying clones with regulation of TR2 expression in the presence and absence of tetracycline (1.5 µg/mL) using both reverse transcription-PCR and flow cytometry.

Statistical Analysis.
One-way ANOVA was performed using Graphpad Prism 3.0 software (Graphpad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA). Tumor growth curves were compared with a Bonferroni post-test to reduce the overall chance of a type one error (28) . Data were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were analyzed using a logrank test.


   RESULTS
Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cytotoxicity of Apo2L/TRAIL and Anti-TRAIL 2 Monoclonal Antibody In vitro.
Previous reports have demonstrated that a variety of preparations of recombinant TRAIL constructs induce apoptosis in the vast majority of Ewing’s sarcoma cell lines (7, 8, 9, 10) . As these agents simultaneously signal through TR1 and TR2, we began by establishing whether TR2 signaling alone was sufficient to induce apoptosis in Ewing’s sarcoma. All cell lines tested expressed TR2 (Fig. 1ACitation ; see also ref. 7 ), and an agonistic mAb to this receptor induced apoptosis in the majority of Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors cell lines in vitro to a similar degree to that observed after treatment with Apo2L/TRAIL (Fig. 1B)Citation . Apoptosis was readily apparent within 1 day after treatment in nine of 11 Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors cell lines treated with either Apo2L/TRAILor anti-TR2 mAb (data not shown). A majority of cells were found to be apoptotic as early as 16 hours after the addition of Apo2L/TRAIL as evidenced by the Hoescht dye staining of TC71, a representative TRAIL-sensitive line (Fig. 1C)Citation . Therefore, agonistic binding to TR2 alone is sufficient to induce apoptosis in Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors cell lines in vitro, and we observed equal susceptibility of Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors cell lines in response to Apo2L/TRAIL (which ligates both TR1 and TR2 receptors) and anti-TR2.



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 1. Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors cells are exquisitely sensitive to both Apo2L and agonistic anti-TR2 ({alpha}TR2) mAb in vitro. Results are representative of a minimum of three individual experiments on eight different TRAIL-sensitive cell lines. A, surface expression of TR2 on a representative Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors cell line (TC71) as determined by fluorescence-activated cell sorter staining. B, decreased viability of Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors over time after culture with either TRAIL/Apo2L (200 µg/mL; black solid line) or anti-TR2 mAb (50 µg/mL; gray line) compared with medium alone (dotted line) as determined by trypan blue exclusion and confirmed by propidium iodide staining. C, phase contrast photomicrographs and Hoescht dye staining of cells cultured for 24 hours in medium alone, Apo2L/TRAIL, or anti-TR2. Magnification, x100.

 
TRAIL Receptor Agonists Impact Tumor Growth In vivo.
To investigate the antitumor activity of TRAIL receptor agonists in vivo, xenograft tumors were established using TRAIL-sensitive Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors lines (TC71 or EWS-925) that routinely generate both primary and spontaneous metastatic tumors after intramuscular injection in SCID/bg mice. A single lower extremity tumor was palpable in each animal by day 21, and mice were randomized to receive Apo2L/TRAIL (50 µg/kg/d), anti-TR2 mAb (5 µg/kg/d), or HBSS alone. Tumor dimensions were measured three times weekly during the 14-day treatment course, and the calculated mean tumor volumes are plotted in Fig. 2ACitation . Both Apo2L/TRAIL and {alpha}TR2 mAb slowed the growth of these established tumors (P < 0.01), and there was no difference observed between the two treatment arms. Of 21 mice treated, Apo2L/TRAIL therapy resulted in four long-term complete responses (19%) and nine temporary responses wherein growth of tumor resumed after withdrawal of treatment (43%), for an overall response rate of 62%. Similar results were observed after anti-TR2 mAb treatment with four of 44 (9%) long-term complete responses and 27 of 44 (61%) temporary responses for an overall response rate of 70% (P > 0.05 compared with Apo2L/TRAIL). Overall, TRAIL receptor agonists as single agents were able to slow tumor growth or cause durable regression in 44 of 65 (67%) of mice with Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors xenograft tumors. Therefore, tumors from Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors are sensitive to TRAIL receptor agonists in vivo as well as in vitro.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 2. TRAIL receptor agonists mediate antitumor effects on established Ewing’s sarcoma xenografts. Xenograft tumors were established by intramuscular injection of TC71 Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors cells. Mice with palpable tumors were randomized to receive TRAIL/Apo2L (50 µg/kg/d), anti-TR2 (5 µg/kg/d), or HBSS intraperitoneal injections for 10 days. Mice were followed with serial lower leg measurements [lower extremity volume at the site of the tumor was determined using the formula (D x d2/6) x {pi}, where D is longer diameter and d is shorter diameter]. A. Mean tumor volume + SE are plotted over time for a single experiment. B, summary of response rates for indicated agents after treatment of established xenograft tumors. Overall response rates are defined as percentage of mice with tumors less than 50% of control mean at end of treatment as averaged across six experiments and two different cell lines. Subtherapeutic doses of doxorubicin (1 mg/kg/week) were administered alone ({cjs2113}) or in conjunction with anti-TR2 mAb ({cjs2110}) and compared with responses observed in sham-treated ({square}), TRAIL/Apo2L ({blacksquare}), or anti-TR2 mAb single agent ({cjs2108}). *, P < 0.01 compared with control.

 
To determine whether TRAIL receptor agonist therapy may be more effective against microscopic primary tumors, TRAIL receptor agonist therapy was initiated before the establishment of a palpable tumor (day 7 after tumor injection). Again, both Apo2L/TRAILand {alpha}TR2 mAb significantly decreased tumor growth as measured by mean tumor volume and overall survival (Fig. 2B)Citation ; however, there was no significant improvement compared with experiments in which TRAIL receptor agonists were begun after the establishment of palpable tumor. Furthermore, neither increases in dose nor duration of treatments substantially altered the efficacy of the TRAIL receptor agonists (data not shown). Therefore, although it is clear that TRAIL receptor agonists are active against tumors from Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors in vivo, the antitumor activity observed was less than that which would have been predicted based on in vitro sensitivity alone.

Several chemotherapeutic agents, including doxorubicin, have been shown to increase TRAIL receptor expression in tumor cells via a p53-dependent mechanism (29 , 30) . Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors cells are generally sensitive to doxorubicin both in vivo and in vitro. We determined that doxorubicin administered as a single agent at 1 mg/kg/week intraperitoneally in our xenograft model was the optimal dose to slow tumor growth without resulting in a full regression. When used in combination with anti-TR2 or Apo2L, doxorubicin did not increase the number of animals responding to TRAIL receptor agonists or overall survival (Fig. 2BCitation ; data not shown). These findings were consistent across three experiments and using two different Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors cell lines. Therefore, subtherapeutic doxorubicin did not increase the response rate to TRAIL receptor agonist therapy in this setting.

Because this xenograft model of Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors allows for control of local tumor growth via resection of tumor-bearing limb but reproducibly results in metastases, we also assessed the efficacy of TRAIL receptor agonists against metastatic disease. After removal of the primary tumor mass, untreated mice routinely developed recurrent or metastatic disease to their lungs, chest wall, or abdomen. Mice were randomized to receive treatment with anti-TR2, Apo2L/TRAIL, or sham from day 7 post-amputation to day 21. Metastatic disease was identified by twice weekly physical examinations and confirmed on necropsy as described previously (31) . Metastatic disease was evident in all sham-treated mice by 4 weeks after surgery, and treatment with either TRAIL receptor agonist did not significantly decrease the incidence or alter the time to development of metastatic disease (data not shown). Thus, TRAIL receptor agonists appear to be more effective against the primary Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors than in preventing recurrent metastatic disease.

In vivo Growth Decreases TRAIL Sensitivity of Ewing’s Sarcoma Family of Tumors Xenograft Cells.
Although TRAIL receptor agonists consistently impacted overall tumor growth in this model, it was clear that some tumors in each group were nonresponsive to TRAIL receptor agonist therapy, thus suggesting the emergence of TRAIL resistance during in vivo growth. To assess TRAIL sensitivity of cells within xenograft tumors, primary tumors from both TRAIL receptor agonist–treated and nontreated animals were surgically removed, minced, and plated as single-cell suspensions in RPMI +10% fetal calf serum. Five days later, when a semiconfluent layer of explant cell growth was evident, Apo2L/TRAIL was added to explant cultures, and subsequent apoptosis was assessed. Tumor explants prepared in this manner showed diminished sensitivity to TRAIL-mediated apoptosis when compared with the parent cell line that had been exclusively passaged in vitro (Fig. 3A)Citation . The resistance was observed regardless of which TRAIL receptor agonist was administered in vitro. Explants were also resistant to death induced by anti-TR2 mAb (data not shown). Similar results were obtained with multiple cell line/xenograft pairs, suggesting that this phenomenon was not cell line specific. Moreover, explant cells from untreated animals were equally resistant to Apo2L/TRAIL-induced apoptosis as cells from TRAIL receptor agonist–treated animals (Fig. 3A)Citation . This demonstrates that alterations in TRAIL sensitivity were not due to selection pressure by the TRAIL receptor agonist therapy.



View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 3. Explant cells are less sensitive to TRAIL-mediated apoptosis and have decreased surface expression of TR1 and TR2 compared with parent cell lines. A. Xenograft tumors were removed from untreated or anti-TR2 mAb–treated mice at a tumor volume of 700 mm3. Single-cell suspensions of explant cells were cultured with medium alone (top row) or 200 µg/mL Apo2L/TRAIL for 16 hours. Apoptosis was measured by annexin V/7AAD staining. B. Single-cell suspensions were obtained from untreated xenografts and stained with anti-TR1, anti-TR2, and anti-CD99 analyzed by flow cytometry. Xenograft explant staining (shaded histogram) is compared with cell lines that had been exclusively passaged in vitro (dotted lines). Isotype control is shown with a solid gray line. C. Xenograft tumors were harvested at indicated sizes and stained as in B.

 
To identify the changes that lead to decreased TRAIL sensitivity in vivo, we analyzed the expression of TR1 and TR2 on the surface of xenograft explant cells. The surface expression of both TR1 and TR2 were consistently decreased in cells grown from tumor tissue explants compared with parent cell lines that had been solely passaged in vitro (Fig. 3B)Citation . In contrast, expression of other surface markers (e.g., CD99) were unaltered or slightly increased after in vivo growth. To determine whether the level of TRAIL receptor expression correlated with tumor size, xenograft tumors spanning a range of sizes were removed for analysis. TR1 and TR2 expression were consistently down-regulated independent of tumor size or time in vivo (Fig. 3C)Citation . The down-regulation was reversible because TR1 and TR2 expression returned to baseline after several passages ex vivo (data not shown). Taken together, these results demonstrate that the in vivo growth of tumors from Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors renders them less sensitive to TRAIL receptor agonists and that in vivo TRAIL resistance correlates with TRAIL receptor down-regulation, suggesting that receptor down-regulation is one mechanism by which tumors growing in vivo acquire resistance to TRAIL-mediated cell death.

Lack of TR2 expression has been shown to correlate with TRAIL resistance in Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors cells (8) and neuroblastoma (12) . To determine whether forced expression of TR2 could restore TRAIL sensitivity in the xenograft/explant system, we transfected TC71 Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors cell lines with a TR2 expression vector driven by a tet-off regulatable cytomegalovirus promoter (Fig. 4A and B)Citation . TR2-transfected and control cell lines were injected into SCID/bg mice as before, and tumor was evident in all experimental groups with similar growth curves (data not shown). Tumors were surgically removed at day 25 and plated in single-cell suspensions. Apo2L/TRAIL was added on day 5 when cells reached approximately 75% confluence. Viability and apoptosis were determined after 16 hours. Explant cells, whether wild-type or TR2 transfected, were significantly less sensitive to TRAIL treatment when compared with parent cell lines (Fig. 4C)Citation . Therefore, forced expression of TR2 was not able to restore sensitivity of explant cells to TRAIL receptor, suggesting that either down-regulation is mediated by factors other than transcriptional regulation and/or other additional changes in the TRAIL signaling pathway may be involved in the decreased TRAIL sensitivity.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 4. Transfection of TR2 is not sufficient to restore ex vivo TRAIL sensitivity. A, PCR evidence of ectopic TR2 plasmid expression in transfected lines versus nontransfected lines (MT). B, fluorescence-activated cell sorter detection of surface TR2 on transfected cells grown in the absence of tetracycline (shaded histograms) compared with baseline expression in the presence of tetracycline. Xenograft tumors were established with TC71 cells that were nontransfected (wt), mock-transfected (MT), or transfected with a TR2 receptor (T2-line A, T2-line B). Tumors had similar growth patterns and were removed after 25 days of untreated growth. Single-cell suspensions of parent cell lines ({blacksquare}) or explant cells ({cjs2113}) were grown in the presence or absence of 200 µg/mL Apo2L/TRAIL, and viability was determined at 16 hours by propidium iodide staining. Data represent percent viability after Apo2L compared with duplicate wells that were untreated.

 
Interferon Restores TRAIL Sensitivity in Explant Cells and Up-regulates Expression of TRAIL-R1 and TRAIL-R2 Expression In vitro and In vivo.
It has been previously reported that TRAIL-resistant Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors cell lines can be rendered sensitive to TRAIL by pretreatment with IFN{gamma} (7) . To determine whether IFN{gamma} was able to overcome the changes that rendered explant cells TRAIL resistant, we treated explant cultures with IFN{gamma} for 24 hours before addition of TRAIL/Apo2L. Addition of IFN{gamma} had little effect on the TRAIL-induced apoptosis in parent cell lines but significantly improved TRAIL sensitivity in explant cells (Fig. 5A and B)Citation . In all cases, whether explant cells were derived from treated or untreated mice, IFN{gamma} restored TRAIL sensitivity to levels seen in parental cell lines passaged exclusively in vitro. To determine whether TRAIL pathway mediators were up-regulated by IFN{gamma}, Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors cell lines were assessed by RNase protection assay. Although TR1 message levels were unchanged after treatment, TR2, caspase 8, and even the ligand TRAIL itself were up-regulated in Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors cells following with IFN{gamma} treatment (representative line shown in Fig. 5CCitation ).



View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 5. IFN{gamma} treatment increases susceptibility of explants to TRAIL while increasing caspase 8, TR1, and TR2 expression in vivo. A. TC71 xenograft tumors were removed after 10 days of sham and plated as single-cell suspensions. Cultures of TC71, which had been passaged solely in vitro, were used for comparison. At 70% confluence, IFN{gamma} was added to wells. After 24 hours, TRAIL/Apo2L (200 µg/mL) was added to cultures, and then cells were harvested 8 hours later. Viability as determined by trypan blue exclusion is shown for sham ({square}), TRAIL only ({blacksquare}), IFN only ({blacksquare}), or TRAIL + IFN {gamma} ({blacksquare}). *, P < 0.01 compared with parent cell line. B, phase contrast photomicrographs of LG and LG explant cells taken at x100 magnification after treatment as described in A. C. Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors cells were cultured with (+) or without (–) IFN{gamma} for 1 to 3 days as indicated and assayed by RNase protection assay to determine levels of mRNA. D. LG xenograft tumors were removed after 10 days of IFN{gamma} injections (25,000 IU once daily intraperitoneally). Immunohistochemistry was performed on paraffin sections using the mouse anti-caspase 8 mAb, anti-TR1, or anti-TR2. Slides were counterstained with hematoxylin.

 
Based on the ability of IFN{gamma} to sensitize TRAIL-resistant explants and the ability for IFN{gamma} exposure in vitro to up-regulate RNA for TRAIL pathway components, human IFN{gamma} (25,000 IU/day) was added to the treatment regimen during primary tumor growth in the xenograft model. Mice with palpable tumors were treated every 24 hours with IFN{gamma} or carrier alone for 5 days. Sixteen hours after the last dose, tumors were removed and fixed in formalin. Immunohistochemistry was performed on these samples to assess expression of TR1, TR2, and caspase 8. Sections from treated xenograft tumors were compared with tissue sections from nontreated mice. Expression of caspase 8, TR1, and TR2 were minimally detectable in untreated tumors but substantially increased after IFN{gamma} treatment (Fig. 5D)Citation . Thus, IFN{gamma} modulates at least three elements of the TRAIL receptor signaling pathway that have been reported to limit TRAIL sensitivity in a variety of models. These results provided the rationale to determine whether such modulation via IFN{gamma} would enhance the sensitivity of Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors to TRAIL receptor agonist therapies.

Efficacy of Interferon plus TRAIL Receptor Agonist In vivo.
Because treatment with IFN{gamma} plus Apo2L/TRAIL was able to induce apoptosis in explant cells and TRAIL-resistant Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors cell lines, we hypothesized that combination treatment in vivo could overcome the resistant phenotype and lead to greater antitumor efficacy. Mice received injections of Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors tumor cells, and tumors were allowed to develop for 7 days before initiation of treatment with anti-TR2, IFN{gamma}, or both. Mice were then followed throughout the 2-week treatment period for development of measurable tumor. IFN{gamma} treatment alone was not active in controlling growth of primary tumor as it did not significantly slow tumor growth when compared with control. Combination therapy using TRAIL receptor agonist and IFN was equally effective, with a trend toward more effective compared with anti-TR2 alone at controlling primary tumor growth during treatment because there was a modest increase in the time to reach the target volume for amputation (700 mm3): day 27 in controls or IFN{gamma} only, day 32 in animals treated with TRAIL receptor agonists alone, and day 38 in animals receiving both TRAIL receptor agonists and IFN{gamma} (P = 0.07). Mean tumor volume on day 28 was 153 ± 51 mm3 in anti-TR2–treated groups versus 133 ± 47 mm3 in TR+IFN{gamma}–treated groups (P = 0.8), and the response rate of animals was 60% whether they were treated with single-agent anti-TR2 or combination of TR+IFN{gamma} (Fig. 6)Citation . Therefore, there was no definitive evidence for significant improvements in local tumor control when IFN{gamma} was added to the TRAIL receptor agonist treatment regimen.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Fig. 6. Antitumor and antimetastatic effects of TRAIL receptor agonists and IFN{gamma}. Ewing’s sarcoma tumor cells (2 x 106) were injected into the gastrocnemius of 4- to 12-week-old SCID/bg mice on day 0. After tumor was allowed to establish for 7 days, daily intraperitoneal injections were begun (on 5 days, off 2 days for three cycles) of TRAIL receptor (anti-TR2 at 5 µg/kg/d), IFN (25,000 IU/d), or both (TR+I). A. Mice were followed for development of palpable tumor with lower leg measurements. Lower extremity volumes without tumor were approximately 50 mm3. Primary tumors were removed by survival surgery when they reached >1,000 mm3. B. Mice were followed for palpable recurrent tumors or shortness of breath indicative of pulmonary metastases, which were confirmed on necropsy. Overall survival of mice from A. *, P < 0.05 compared with control.

 
After cessation of therapy, tumors were allowed to grow until they reached a volume of 1000 mm3 and were then surgically removed. After resection, no additional treatment was administered, and mice were followed for the development of metastatic disease as determined by serial exams and confirmed by autopsy. Mice treated with anti-TR2 alone had identical metastatic incidence rates as seen in the control groups. However, the group that received anti-TR2 plus IFN{gamma} had a significantly decreased incidence of metastatic disease (Fig. 6)Citation . Because metastatic disease was less prevalent in combination-treated mice, there was a significant difference in overall survival (60% versus 0% at 5 months for treated versus nontreated, respectively). This remarkable difference was borne out in three similar experiments on two separate cell lines. Therefore, combination therapy, at best, modestly increases sensitivity of the primary tumor to TRAIL-mediated apoptosis, but it provides remarkable increases in overall survival through antimetastatic effects.


   DISCUSSION
Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
In this study, we demonstrate that ligation of a TRAIL death receptor by either its synthetic ligand (Apo2L) or an agonist mAb (anti-TR2) induces efficient apoptosis of Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors cells in vitro. This activity translates into significant antitumor activity in vivo because mice bearing Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors xenografts and treated with Apo2L/TRAIL or anti-TR2 mAb demonstrate slower tumor growth and increased overall survival rates. Although in vivo activity of TRAIL receptor agonists has been shown previously in several epithelial cancers (20 , 32) , this is the first report of in vivo efficacy in pediatric sarcomas. These results encourage the pursuit of clinical trials for TRAIL receptor agonists in childhood solid tumors and potentially in sarcomas if these agents are found to have a tolerable safety profile.

Although treatment with either Apo2L/TRAIL or anti-TR2 mAb induced reproducible and significant antitumor effects in vivo, the level of response was less than might be predicted by the exquisite sensitivity of these cell lines observed in vitro (Fig. 1)Citation . Complete responses were occasionally seen, and partial responses were common after TRAIL receptor agonist treatment of established or developing Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors xenografts, but some tumors in each experimental group did not respond to Apo2L or anti-TR2. Similar results have been seen in other in vivo models of TRAIL receptor agonist therapies, and chemotherapy has often been coadministered to improve the overall response rate (6 , 30) . However, concomitant administration of doxorubicin did not improve the in vivo response rate of Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors xenografts to TRAIL receptor agonist therapy (Fig. 2B)Citation .

We postulated that the limited efficacy of TRAIL receptor agonists in vivo might be due to the selection pressure of the TRAIL receptor agonist therapy itself through receptor down-regulation or clonal selection. To test this, xenograft explants were assayed in vitro to determine their sensitivity to Apo2L. TRAIL resistance was observed after TRAIL receptor agonist treatment in vivo, but surprisingly, TRAIL resistance was also equally present in explant cells from nontreated animals. Even when tumors were initiated from a single subclone that demonstrated in vitro sensitivity to Apo2L, tumor explants demonstrated TRAIL resistance (data not shown). These results provide the novel observation that the milieu within the tumor microenvironment attenuates signaling via TRAIL death receptors, rendering growing tumors substantially less TRAIL sensitive than is predicted based on studies of cells passaged exclusively in vitro.

The mechanisms by which tumors acquire TRAIL resistance in vivo are potentially manifold and remain unclear. We observed significant down-regulation of TR1 and TR2 both in TRAIL receptor agonist–treated and untreated mice. Immune surveillance is partially mediated by TRAIL expression on immune cells (33) , suggesting that selection pressure by immune elements could result in such effects. However, the SCID/bg mice used in these experiments lack both T cells and NK cells, which would be expected to mediate such immune selection. Furthermore, although antigen-presenting cells present in SCID/bg mice also express TRAIL, TRAIL signaling is species specific (34) , and therefore murine TRAIL would not be expected to select against TRAIL-sensitive human Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors cells. Thus, although the mechanism of receptor down-regulation remains unclear, we can conclude that it is not a result of selection pressure by TRAIL receptor agonist therapies, and it appears unlikely to result from immune selection pressure.

As signaling through these TR1 and/or TR2 is critical for initiation of the TRAIL death signal, we postulated that receptor down-regulation contributed to TRAIL resistance. These death pathway receptors are likely to be regulated at both the level of transcription and protein expression. Indeed, TR1 and TR2 have been previously shown to have rapid turnover (35) , suggesting that protein trafficking, stability, and/or cleavage mechanisms play key roles in the regulation of their expression. This is consistent with our results that Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors cells with forced expression of TR2 can still acquire TRAIL resistance after growth in vivo. Although this result could be due to other as yet unidentified changes within the TRAIL signaling cascade that may also contribute to TRAIL resistance in vivo, post-translational regulation is likely an important component of the mechanisms leading to TRAIL resistance in vivo. For example, even in these transfected cells, surface expression of TR2 was variably decreased after in vivo growth (data not shown). Ongoing studies are under way to formally dissect the mechanisms responsible for TRAIL receptor down-regulation.

Previous work has demonstrated that in vitro exposure to IFN{gamma} can influence several elements of the TRAIL-mediated death pathway, including caspase 8 expression (36) , and expression of TRAIL itself (12 , 37) . TRAIL-resistant Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors and neuroblastoma cell lines are rendered TRAIL sensitive after exposure to IFN{gamma} in vitro (7 , 12) . Based on these reports and the capacity for IFN{gamma} to reverse TRAIL resistance in explants (Fig. 5A)Citation , we sought to determine whether exposure to IFN{gamma} could up-regulate TRAIL receptor expression and/or render the TRAIL receptor agonist therapy more effective. Indeed, Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors cell lines or Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors xenograft tumor cells both showed an increased expression of TR1, TR2, and caspase 8 compared with untreated cells or tissues (Fig. 5C and D)Citation . Because IFN{gamma} shows exquisite species specificity (38) , we conclude that the effects of IFN{gamma} on Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors in this model are mediated by direct signaling of IFN{gamma} in the tumor cells themselves rather than via immune effectors. It is known that IFN{gamma} directly up-regulates caspase 8 in neuroblastoma cells in vitro as well as in tumors from patients treated with IFN{gamma} through modulation of IFN-sensitive genes (12) . The data presented here confirm that similar increases in caspase 8 occur after in vitro or in vivo treatment of Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors. We also observed substantial up-regulation of TR2 protein after IFN{gamma} therapy in vivo that correlated with an increase in transcription of TR2 after IFN{gamma} treatment in vitro. In contrast, TR1 expression was up-regulated in vivo without any evidence of transcriptional regulation after IFN{gamma} treatment of Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors cell lines, providing additional evidence that post-translational factors are important in the effects of IFN{gamma} on Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors xenografts. The potential role of intermediaries such as TIMP, which has been reported to diminish metalloproteinase expression and potentially inhibit TRAIL receptor cleavage (39) , are currently under study. Although TRAIL itself has been reported to be up-regulated by IFN{gamma} (25) and we observed this effect in Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors cell lines (Fig. 5C)Citation , IFN{gamma}-induced up-regulation of TRAIL itself seems an unlikely mechanism to explain the increases in TRAIL receptor expression observed in IFN{gamma}-treated animals, because up-regulation of TRAIL on the tumor cells would be expected to select for low TRAIL receptor expression rather than high TRAIL receptor expression as was observed.

Despite the impressive effects of IFN{gamma} on caspase 8, TR1, and TR2, all critical proximal elements of the TRAIL signaling pathway, the addition IFN{gamma} to TRAIL receptor agonists resulted in only marginal, nonsignificant improvements in primary tumor response compared with treatment with TRAIL receptor agonists alone. Importantly, however, the combination treatment was much more effective when the mice were followed for metastatic disease. When IFN{gamma} was administered either as single agent or together with a TRAIL receptor agonist, there was a substantial decrease in incidence of metastases with the best overall survival after combination therapy. Therefore, these results demonstrate an antimetastatic role for IFN{gamma} in addition to modulation of TRAIL receptor signaling elements and sensitization to TRAIL-mediated apoptosis.

In summary, these studies demonstrate in vivo activity of TRAIL receptor agonists in Ewing’s sarcoma. Although the overall response rate of 67% is impressive, very few mice were cured of their tumors with TRAIL receptor agonist therapy alone, and we routinely observed the acquisition of TRAIL resistance after in vivo growth. The mechanisms responsible for in vivo TRAIL resistance are not entirely clear, but it is associated with TRAIL receptor down-modulation and can be reversed ex vivo using IFN{gamma}. Therefore, combination strategies are likely to be required to optimally exploit TRAIL pathways of programmed cell death in the clinical setting, even in tumors such as Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors that demonstrate exquisite in vitro sensitivity. Combining TRAIL receptor agonists with IFN{gamma} appears compelling because IFN{gamma} modulates several elements of the TRAIL signaling pathway that may be responsible for TRAIL resistance, and the group receiving combination therapy was the only one in which effects were observed in both primary tumors and metastatic disease. In summary, our observations show that treatment with TRAIL plus IFN{gamma} is a rationally designed combination therapy, which has significant antitumor efficacy in Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. David Lynch from Amgen and Dr. Avi Ashkenazi of Genentech for their supply of reagents and helpful discussions. We are also grateful to Dr. Chand Khanna from the Pediatric Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, for sharing his expertise in orthotopic tumor implantation and for his critical review of this manuscript.


   FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Requests for reprints: Melinda S. Merchant, Pediatric Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892. E-mail: merchanm{at}mail.nih.gov

Received 5/14/04. Revised 7/27/04. Accepted 9/17/04.


   REFERENCES
Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Wiley SR, Schooley K, Smolak PJ, et al Identification and characterization of a new member of the TNF family that induces apoptosis. Immunity 1995;3:673-82.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Cretney E, Takeda K, Yagita H, Glaccum M, Peschon JJ, Smyth MJ Increased susceptibility to tumor initiation and metastasis in TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand-deficient mice. J Immunol 2002;168:1356-61.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Markovic SN, Murasko DM Role of natural killer and T-cells in interferon induced inhibition of spontaneous metastases of the B16F10L murine melanoma. Cancer Res 1991;51:1124-8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Smyth MJ, Cretney E, Takeda K, et al Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) contributes to interferon {gamma}-dependent natural killer cell protection from tumor metastasis. J Exp Med 2001;193:661-70.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Jo M, Kim TH, Seol DW, et al Apoptosis induced in normal human hepatocytes by tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand. Nat Med 2000;6:564-7.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Ashkenazi A, Pai RC, Fong S, et al Safety and antitumor activity of recombinant soluble Apo2 ligand. J Clin Investig 1999;104:155-62.[Medline]
  7. Kontny HU, Hammerle K, Klein R, Shayan P, Mackall CL, Niemeyer CM Sensitivity of Ewing’s sarcoma to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Cell Death Differ 2001;8:506-14.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Mitsiades N, Poulaki V, Mitsiades C, Tsokos M Ewing’s sarcoma family tumors are sensitive to tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand and express death receptor 4 and death receptor 5. Cancer Res 2001;61:2704-12.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Van Valen F, Fulda S, Truckenbrod B, et al Apoptotic responsiveness of the Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumours to tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL). Int J Cancer 2000;88:252-9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Kumar A, Jasmin A, Eby MT, Chaudhary PM Cytotoxicity of tumor necrosis factor related apoptosis-inducing ligand towards Ewing’s sarcoma cell lines. Oncogene 2001;20:1010-4.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Petak I, Douglas L, Tillman DM, Vernes R, Houghton JA Pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma cell lines are resistant to Fas-induced apoptosis and highly sensitive to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Clin Cancer Res 2000;6:4119-27.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Yang X, Merchant MS, Romero ME, et al Induction of caspase 8 by interferon {gamma} renders some neuroblastoma (NB) cells sensitive to tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) but reveals that a lack of membrane TR1/TR2 also contributes to TRAIL resistance in NB. Cancer Res 2003;63:1122-9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Hopkins-Donaldson S, Bodmer JL, Bourloud KB, Brognara CB, Tschopp J, Gross N Loss of caspase-8 expression in neuroblastoma is related to malignancy and resistance to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Med Pediatr Oncol 2000;35:608-11.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Evdokiou A, Bouralexis S, Atkins GJ, et al Chemotherapeutic agents sensitize osteogenic sarcoma cells, but not normal human bone cells, to Apo2L/TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Int J Cancer 2002;99:491-504.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Belka C, Schmid B, Marini P, et al Sensitization of resistant lymphoma cells to irradiation-induced apoptosis by the death ligand TRAIL. Oncogene 2001;20:2190-6.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Clodi K, Wimmer D, Li Y, et al Expression of tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) receptors and sensitivity to TRAIL-induced apoptosis in primary B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia cells. Br J Haematol 2000;111:580-6.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Thomas WD, Hersey P TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) induces apoptosis in Fas ligand-resistant melanoma cells and mediates CD4 T cell killing of target cells. J Immunol 1998;161:2195-200.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Walczak H, Miller RE, Ariail K, et al Tumoricidal activity of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand in vivo. Nat Med 1999;5:157-63.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Singh TR, Shankar S, Chen X, Asim M, Srivastava RK Synergistic interactions of chemotherapeutic drugs and tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand/Apo-2 ligand on apoptosis and on regression of breast carcinoma in vivo. Cancer Res 2003;63:5390-400.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Gliniak B, Le T Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand’s antitumor activity in vivo is enhanced by the chemotherapeutic agent CPT-11. Cancer Res 1999;59:6153-8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Gong B, Almasan A Apo2 ligand/TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand and death receptor 5 mediate the apoptotic signaling induced by ionizing radiation in leukemic cells. Cancer Res 2000;60:5754-60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Van Valen F, Fulda S, Truckenbrod B, et al Apoptotic responsiveness of the Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumours to tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL). Int J Cancer 2000;88:252-9.
  23. Aaronson DS, Horvath CM A road map for those who don’t know JAK-STAT. Science 2002;296:1653-5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Sedger LM, Shows DM, Blanton RA, et al IFN-{gamma} mediates a novel antiviral activity through dynamic modulation of TRAIL and TRAIL receptor expression. J Immunol 1999;163:920-6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Meng RD, El-Deiry WS p53-independent upregulation of KILLER/DR5 TRAIL receptor expression by glucocorticoids and interferon-{gamma}. Exp Cell Res 2001;262:154-69.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Merchant MS, Woo CW, Mackall CL, Thiele CJ Potential use of imatinib in Ewing’s sarcoma: evidence for in vitro and in vivo activity. J Natl Cancer Inst (Bethesda) 2002;94:1673-9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Paulus W, Baur I, Boyce FM, Breakefield XO, Reeves SA Self-contained, tetracycline-regulated retroviral vector system for gene delivery to mammalian cells. J Virol 1996;70:62-7.[Abstract]
  28. Miller R . Simultaneous statistical inference Ed 2. 198115-6. Springer-Verlag New York, NY
  29. Wu XX, Kakehi Y, Mizutani Y, et al Enhancement of TRAIL/Apo2L-mediated apoptosis by Adriamycin through inducing DR4 and DR5 in renal cell carcinoma cells. Int J Cancer 2003;104:409-17.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Nagane M, Pan G, Weddle JJ, Dixit VM, Cavenee WK, Huang HJ Increased death receptor 5 expression by chemotherapeutic agents in human gliomas causes synergistic cytotoxicity with tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Res 2000;60:847-53.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Zhang H, Merchant MS, Chua KS, et al Tumor expression of 4-1BB ligand sustains tumor lytic T cells. Cancer Biol Ther 2003;2:579-86.[Medline]
  32. Ichikawa K, Liu W, Zhao L, et al Tumoricidal activity of a novel anti-human DR5 monoclonal antibody without hepatocyte cytotoxicity. Nat Med 2001;7:954-60.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Takeda K, Smyth MJ, Cretney E, et al Critical role for tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand in immune surveillance against tumor development. J Exp Med 2002;195:161-9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Kelley SK, Harris LA, Xie D, et al Preclinical studies to predict the disposition of Apo2L/tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand in humans: characterization of in vivo efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and safety. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2001;299:31-8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Neznanov N, Chumakov KP, Ullrich A, Agol VI, Gudkov AV Unstable receptors disappear from cell surface during poliovirus infection. Med Sci Monit 2002;8:BR391-6.[Medline]
  36. Kim S, Kang J, Evers BM, Chung DH Interferon-{gamma} induces caspase-8 in neuroblastomas without affecting methylation of caspase-8 promoter. J Pediatr Surg 2004;39:509-15.[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Abadie A, Wietzerbin J Involvement of TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) induction in interferon {gamma}-mediated apoptosis in Ewing tumor cells. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2003;1010:117-20.[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Veomett MJ, Veomett GE Species specificity of interferon action: maintenance and establishment of the antiviral state in the presence of a heterospecific nucleus. J Virol 1979;31:785-94.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Ahonen M, Poukkula M, Baker AH, et al Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-3 induces apoptosis in melanoma cells by stabilization of death receptors. Oncogene 2003;22:2121-34.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
T. Yoshimoto, N. Morishima, I. Mizoguchi, M. Shimizu, H. Nagai, S. Oniki, M. Oka, C. Nishigori, and J. Mizuguchi
Antiproliferative Activity of IL-27 on Melanoma
J. Immunol., May 15, 2008; 180(10): 6527 - 6535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Pathol.Home page
A. Lissat, T. Vraetz, M. Tsokos, R. Klein, M. Braun, N. Koutelia, P. Fisch, M. E. Romero, L. Long, P. Noellke, et al.
Interferon-{gamma} Sensitizes Resistant Ewing's Sarcoma Cells to Tumor Necrosis Factor Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand-Induced Apoptosis by Up-Regulation of Caspase-8 Without Altering Chemosensitivity
Am. J. Pathol., June 1, 2007; 170(6): 1917 - 1930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
C. A. Karikari, I. Roy, E. Tryggestad, G. Feldmann, C. Pinilla, K. Welsh, J. C. Reed, E. P. Armour, J. Wong, J. Herman, et al.
Targeting the apoptotic machinery in pancreatic cancers using small-molecule antagonists of the X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein
Mol. Cancer Ther., March 1, 2007; 6(3): 957 - 966.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. Wu, X. Xiao, P. Zhao, G. Xue, Y. Zhu, X. Zhu, L. Zheng, Y. Zeng, and W. Huang
Minicircle-IFN{gamma} Induces Antiproliferative and Antitumoral Effects in Human Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2006; 12(15): 4702 - 4713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JBJSHome page
K. L. Weber
What's New in Musculoskeletal Oncology
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2005; 87(6): 1400 - 1410.
[Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow