Cancer Research The Future of Cancer Research: Science and Patient Impact 09 AM Call for Abstracts
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Badawi, A. F.
Right arrow Articles by Badr, M. Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Badawi, A. F.
Right arrow Articles by Badr, M. Z.
[Cancer Research 64, 1181-1189, February 1, 2004]
© 2004 American Association for Cancer Research

Epidemiology and Prevention

Inhibition of Rat Mammary Gland Carcinogenesis by Simultaneous Targeting of Cyclooxygenase-2 and Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor {gamma}

Alaa F. Badawi1, Mazen B. Eldeen1, Yingying Liu1, Eric A. Ross1 and Mostafa Z. Badr2

1 Division of Population Science, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and 2 School of Pharmacy, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri


   ABSTRACT
Top
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
We examined the effect of celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor, and N-(9-fluorenyl-methyloxycarbonyl)-L-leucine (F-L-Leu), a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} (PPAR{gamma}) agonist, separately and combined, on the development of methylnitrosourea (MNU)-induced rat mammary gland carcinogenesis. Celecoxib and F-L-Leu significantly reduced tumor incidence and multiplicity (P < 0.05). Combining both agents exerted higher (synergistic) cancer inhibition than separate treatments (P < 0.05). The effects of the test drugs on COX-2 and PPAR{gamma} expression and on the synthesis of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and 15-deoxy-{Delta}12,14-PGJ2 (15d-PGJ2) were examined in rat mammary normal (MNU-untreated), uninvolved, and tumor (MNU-treated) tissues. Celecoxib and F-L-Leu, separately, inhibited COX-2 and up-regulated PPAR{gamma} expression. These effects were paralleled by inhibition of PGE2 synthesis and up-regulation of 15d-PGJ2. Combined treatment resulted in higher alterations in COX-2 and PPAR{gamma} transcripts and PG synthesis compared with separate administrations. The effect of the test agents on Bcl2, BAX, and protein kinase C{alpha} expression levels were examined in the rat mammary gland and the pro-(BAX:Bcl2) and anti-[PKC{alpha}*(Bcl2/BAX)] apoptotic ratios were evaluated. Each drug increased the proapoptotic ratio by 2- to 7-fold and reduced the antiapoptotic ratio by 2- to >8-fold in all tissues. Combined treatment, however, resulted in >9- to 14-fold up-regulation in the proapoptotic processes and 15- to >30-fold down-regulation in the antiapoptotic ones. Analyses were also carried out on the drug-induced modulation of cell cycle regulators and proliferation markers (cyclin-dependent kinase 1 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen). F-L-Leu and celecoxib each reduced the cyclin-dependent kinase 1 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen expression in the tumor. Higher down-regulation was attained in all tissues by combined treatment where cyclin-dependent kinase 1 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen almost retained the expression levels observed in the normal glands. In conclusion, simultaneous targeting of COX-2 and PPAR{gamma} may inhibit mammary cancer development more effectively than targeting each molecule alone. COX-2 inhibitors and PPAR{gamma} agonists coordinately mediate their anticancer effect via both COX-dependent (inhibition of COX-2, activation of PPAR{gamma}, and modulation PG synthesis) and COX-independent (induction of proapoptotic factors and inhibition of cell proliferation) pathways.


   INTRODUCTION
Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The high prevalence of breast cancer (1) and the limited options for treatment provide a strong rationale for identifying new, selective molecular targets for pharmacological modulation and chemopreventive intervention. Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-{gamma} (PPAR{gamma}) are among the regulatory molecules that have emerged as promising candidates for breast cancer prevention (2) . COX-2 and its products, e.g., prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), induce inflammation and mediate a number of apoptotic and cell growth-signaling pathways and may play a role in carcinogenesis (3) . Similarly, inactivation of PPAR{gamma} influences the transcription of genes involved in cell proliferation and apoptosis (4 , 5) . Several lines of evidence suggest a possible coordinated action and cross-talk between the two molecules (6 , see below). In human breast cancer, independent studies demonstrate that COX-2 and PPAR{gamma}, respectively, exhibit induction (7, 8, 9, 10) and inactivation (10 , 11) . Experimental evidence suggests that inhibition of COX-2 (12, 13, 14) , e.g., by celecoxib, and activation of PPAR{gamma} (15, 16, 17) , e.g., by glitazones or 15-deoxy-{Delta}12, 14-PGJ2 (15d-PGJ2), prevent carcinogen-induced mammary cancer in animals. Recently, combinational targeting of more than one molecule, e.g., estrogen receptors and PPAR{gamma} (15) or retinoid X receptors and PPAR{gamma} (16) , has emerged as an approach that provides more effective prevention with fewer side effects than targeting separate molecules. We thought, therefore, that simultaneous targeting of COX-2 and PPAR{gamma} might act additively, if not synergistically, to inhibit the development of mammary cancer.

Although several mechanisms are proposed to explain the antitumorigenic action of COX-2 inhibitors and PPAR{gamma} ligands in the mammary gland, their effect on apoptotic signaling and cell proliferation has received particular attention (6) . Available information suggests that tissue growth depends upon the balance between cell growth and death. The two rates are normally balanced in the adult resting normal mammary gland so that overgrowth does not occur (18) . Apoptosis plays a critical role in the homeostasis of the mammary glands, e.g., in tissue remodeling during postlactation involution (19) . A major pathway implicated in apoptosis in the normal (and cancerous) mammary gland is the intrinsic or mitochondrial signaling triggered and mediated by Bcl2 family members, e.g., BAX and Bcl2 (19 , 20) . The antiapoptotic Bcl2 is detected in 80% of breast cancer cases and is related to metastasis, chemoresistance, and poor prognosis (19) . The proapoptotic BAX, on the other hand, is expressed in high levels in the normal breast tissue but only weakly or not at all in tumor (21) . Loss of BAX correlates with shorter survival time and faster tumor growth (22 , 23) . The interaction between BAX and Bcl2 determines the net apoptotic gains and can subsequently play a critical role in cancer development and prevention (19 , 24 , 25) . Many cancer therapeutic (26, 27, 28) and preventive (24 , 29) agents mediate their action by altering the activity and expression of Bcl2-family genes/proteins. Similarly, COX-2 inhibitors and PPAR{gamma} ligands induce proapoptotic signaling in human breast cancer cells by up-regulating BAX and down-regulating Bcl2 (30, 31, 32) transcription. Several antiapoptotic factors, e.g., protein kinase C (PKC){alpha}, influence BAX-Bcl2 interaction and, thereby, mediate cell survival (33) .

Another mechanism by which COX-2 inhibitors and PPAR{gamma} ligands may inhibit carcinogenesis is by attenuating cell growth and inducing cell cycle arrest (6 , 32) . This action may occur because of the ability of these agents to reduce the expression of markers of cell proliferation, e.g., proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA; Refs. 34 , 35 ) and Ki-67 (36 , 37) , and deregulate the activity of factors involved in cell cycle progression, e.g., cyclin-dependent kinases (cdks; Ref. 38 ). Accordingly, during mammary carcinogenesis, the extent to which COX-2 inhibitors and PPAR{gamma} ligands influence the dynamic interaction between apoptosis and cell proliferation may play a role in their cancer preventive efficacy.

In this report, we examine the efficacy of celecoxib, a COX-2 inhibitor (Fig. 1A)Citation , and N-(9-fluorenyl-methyloxycarbonyl)-L-leucine (F-L-Leu), a PPAR{gamma} agonist (Fig. 1A)Citation , separately and in combination, on the inhibition of N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU)-induced rat mammary gland carcinogenesis, a well-established model for breast cancer (39) . Moreover, to identify some of the molecular pathways involved in the anticancer potentials of these agents, we evaluated their effect on an array of markers of apoptosis and cell proliferation known to be involved in mammary gland development as well as susceptibility to cancer.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 1. Chemical structures of the test agents (A) and the experimental design (B). Shaded areas in the experimental design (B) represent durations of drug treatment.

 

   MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animals, Treatments, and Tumor Induction
Female Sprague Dawley rats (n = 100), purchased from Taconic Farms (Germantown, NY), were housed at 22 ± 2°C, 50% humidity with a 12-h light-dark cycle. Tap water was provided ad libitum throughout the experiment. Rats were acclimatized for 1 week on an AIN-93G diet (Dytes Co., Bethlehem, PA). The composition of the experimental diet has been described previously (40) . As shown in Fig. 1BCitation , animals were given a single i.p. injection of 50 mg/kg MNU (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) at 21 days of age (39) . MNU was dissolved in 0.05% acetic acid in normal saline and used within 30 min of preparation (13) . One week later, rats were randomized into four equal experimental groups that received AIN-93G diet alone or containing the maximum tolerated dose of F-L-Leu (250 ppm; Sigma; Ref. 41 ) and celecoxib (1500 ppm; SC-58635, kindly supplied by Pharmacia, Skokie, IL; Ref. 14 ) separately or in combination. To circumvent the effect of MNU treatment and to examine the response of normal tissues to the test drugs, 40 age-matched rats were randomized similarly to the above four groups but not administered MNU (Fig. 1B)Citation . All animals were weighed twice weekly and at autopsy. MNU-treated groups were palpated for mammary lesions every other day. At 90 days of age (i.e., 8 weeks after MNU), all animals were killed by CO2 inhalation. Mammary tumors and uninvolved (preneoplastic) tissues were collected from MNU-treated rats, whereas normal mammary tissues were obtained from the MNU-untreated groups. Tissues were stored at -80°C for analysis. Liver, kidney, stomach, upper intestinal tract, and abdominal adipose tissue were also collected, weighed, and examined for abnormalities. This study had institutional approval and followed all guidelines for appropriate animal treatment.

Analysis of mRNA and Protein Expression
Reverse Transcription-PCR.
Total RNA was extracted by TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) from mammary epithelial cells that were isolated from the whole mammary tissue as described previously (42) . RNA was subjected to reverse transcription-PCR reaction using Titanium One-Step Reverse Transcription-PCR (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA) protocol (10) . Reverse transcription-PCR reactions were carried out in a total volume of 50 µl buffer containing 0.5–1 µg of RNA, Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase, 20 µM oligo(dT) primers, 40 mM Tricine, 20 mM KCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM each deoxynucleotide triphosphate, 1x Taq enzyme mix provided by the manufacturer, 20 units of recombinant RNase inhibitor, and 45 µM PCR primers that have already been described for COX-1, COX-2, PPAR{gamma}, BAX, Bcl2, PKC{alpha}, and ß-actin (Table 1)Citation . Using a hot-lid Gene-Amp 9700 thermocycler (Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, CT), RNA was reverse transcribed at 50°C for 60 min, followed by 5 min at 94°C. The PCR cycling conditions used in analyzing the apoptotic markers are shown in Table 1Citation . Under each cycling condition, the yield of the amplified products was linear with respect to the input RNA and cycle number. The assay resolved a 2-fold difference in the amount of input RNA. Furthermore, the yields were linear when the PCR reactions were carried out for 20, 30, or 35 cycles. PCR products were separated in 1.5–2% agarose gels and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. Appropriate negative controls were carried out as described previously (41 , 42) to rule out contamination of RNA with genomic DNA and to ensure that no cDNA synthesis would occur before reverse transcriptase inactivation. Digitized images of the stained cDNA products were captured as 8-bit digital TIFF files using a DC290 Digital Camera (Eastman Kodak Co., Rochester, NY). The intensity of each band was measured using Kodak Digital 1D-Image Analysis 3.6 software. Transcripts were normalized to the corresponding ß-actin band and expressed as arbitrary density units.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1 Primers and PCR thermocycling parameters

 
Western Blot Analysis.
Protein isolation was carried out by lysing mammary epithelial cells in 1.5 ml lysis buffer (1% SDS, 1.0 mM sodium orthovanadate, and 10 mM Tris, pH 7.4) and centrifugation at 16,000 x g for 10 min at 4°C. The protein content of the supernatant was quantified by Bio-Rad reagent (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA), using the method of Bradford (48) . Diluted supernatants were incubated for 5 min at 100°C with Laemmli sample buffer (Bio-Rad), and 10–20 µg of protein were loaded per well in 7.5–12% SDS-acrylamide gels, separated by electrophoresis, and electrotransferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad). Membranes were blocked with 5–10% nonfat dry milk (in TBS buffer containing 0.05% Tween 20) and probed for 1–2 h with COX-1, COX-2, PPAR{gamma}, BAX, Bcl2, PKC{alpha}, PCNA, cdk1, and ß-actin polyclonal antibodies. COX-1 and COX-2 antibodies were purchased from Cayman Chemicals (Ann Arbor, MI), whereas other primary and all secondary antibodies were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA). Antibody dilutions (1:100–1:1000) were carried out in 5% nonfat dry milk, and membranes were incubated with peroxidase-conjugated antirabbit or antigoat antibodies at 1:500 to 1:1000 dilution. Membranes were reprobed at least two to three times with markers of the same pathway (i.e., COX and PPAR{gamma} or Bcl2 family members), and ß-actin signal was assessed for each membrane. Signals were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (Perkin-Elmer Life Science, Boston, MA), integrated and normalized to the corresponding ß-actin band and expressed as arbitrary density units.

Analysis of Prostaglandin Synthesis
Levels of PGE2 and 15d-PGJ2 were examined in the whole tissue homogenate by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) as described earlier (10 , 40) . EIA for PGE2 and 15d-PGJ2 was carried out using Correlate-EIA kits (Assay Designs Inc., Ann Arbor, MI) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cross-reactivities of the EIA for a number of eicosanoids were determined by the vendor. The competitive PGE2 EIA analysis exhibits cross-reactivity with PGE1 (70%), PGE3 (16.3%), and PGF1{alpha} (1.4%). 15d-PGJ2 analysis cross-reacts with PGJ2 (49%), {Delta}12-PGJ2 (5.9%), and PGD2 (4.9%). Color intensity was measured at 405 nm using a SpectraMax-250 microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). Levels of PGE2 and 15d-PGJ2 were expressed as ng/g wet tissue. Standard curves and reaction negative and positive controls were generated for PGs and assayed simultaneously with the samples.

Statistical Analysis
Differences between the control and experimental groups in the final body weight and liver:body weight ratios were determined by Mann-Whitney’s test. ANOVA test and Dunnett’s test, adjusted for multiple comparison, were used to evaluate differences among groups. Analysis of differences in tumor incidence (% palpable tumors) was examined using {chi}2 test with Ps subjected to Bonferroni criterion. Student’s t test with Welch’s correction (assuming no equal variance between groups) and the Mann-Whitney test were used to compare tumor multiplicity (tumors/rat) and average tumor weight between controls and test groups. Inhibition of tumor incidence was evaluated using the following equation: I = [(x - y)/(x)] x 100 where I is the percentage of tumor inhibition, x is tumor incidence in controls, and y is tumor incidence in the experimental groups (14) . Tumor inhibition was compared between control and test group(s) using {chi}2 test with Ps adjusted for Bonferroni criterion. An ANOVA test using the Kruskal-Wallis test (i.e., assuming no equal variance between groups) and Dunnett’s test, adjusted for multiple comparisons, were used to evaluate the differences in tumorigenesis among treatments.

Differences in apoptotic and proliferation markers attributable to the test drugs or between normal, uninvolved, and tumor tissues were evaluated by two-way ANOVA test, whereas differences between individual groups (or tissue types) were carried out using Student’s t test. Because BAX and Bcl2 play opposing roles in determining the net apoptotic signal (49) , a ratio of BAX:Bcl2 was created. This variable has proapoptotic numerator (BAX) and antiapoptotic denominator (Bcl2), and therefore, higher ratio values implicate higher proapoptotic gains or lower antiapoptotic rates. Additionally, because more PKC{alpha} promotes protection against apoptosis via involvement in the activation/inactivation of members of Bcl2 family (33) , the interactive variable PKC{alpha}*Bcl2/BAX was generated to consider this interaction. In this variable, because of the antiapoptotic factors in the numerator and the proapoptotic BAX in the denominator, higher ratio values implicate higher levels of antiapoptotic signaling or lower proapoptotic processes. The proapoptotic ratio BAX:Bcl2 and the antiapoptotic variable PKC{alpha}*Bcl2/BAX were evaluated and compared between groups and tissues by two-way ANOVA. Correlational analyses between protein and mRNA expression levels for individual markers were carried out across tissues and treatments by determining the coefficients of correlation (r2) using a polynomial linear regression model. All tests were performed using the SAS System 8.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).


   RESULTS
Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
General Observations.
In response to F-L-Leu and/or celecoxib treatments, no gross or histological changes in liver, kidney, stomach, or upper intestinal tract were observed in the experimental groups. MNU treatment did not induce tumors at sites other than the mammary gland. Body weights were evaluated twice weekly over the course of the experiment and were not different among groups (data not shown). No differences were noted between treatments in the final body weight or the liver:body weight ratio (Table 2)Citation , and we did not observe differences in the abdominal adipose tissue weight or food consumption (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 2 Effect of F-L-Leu and celecoxib on the inhibition of rat mammary gland cancinomaa

 
Inhibition of Rat Mammary Tumorigenesis.
The effect of F-L-Leu and/or celecoxib on mammary gland tumorigenesis is shown in Table 2Citation . Compared with drug-untreated controls, each agent significantly reduced the final tumor incidence, multiplicity, and average tumor weight and extended the tumor latency. Inhibition of mammary cancer by F-L-Leu and celecoxib reached 33 and 41%, respectively. The effect of the test drugs on tumor incidence and latency was reflected by their ability to improve the Kaplan-Meier cumulative risk of mammary cancer (Fig. 2)Citation . We used comparable doses of F-L-Leu and celecoxib (i.e., maximum tolerated doses), and hence, as expected, no differences were noted between the drugs in cancer inhibition. Combined treatment with F-L-Leu and celecoxib elicited higher inhibition in average tumor weight, multiplicity, and incidence (>80%), longer latency, and further improvement in the Kaplan-Meier cumulative cancer risk compared with separate treatments or controls (Table 2Citation and Fig. 2Citation ). When the effects of the test drugs on tumorigenesis were adjusted for multiple comparisons (Dunnett’s test), cancer was inhibited significantly only by the combined treatment, implicating a possible synergistic interaction between the test agents on mammary carcinogenesis.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 2. The Kaplan-Meier cumulative risk of rat mammary gland carcinomas in response to treatments with F-L-Leu and celecoxib. Overall, P = 0.0015 (log-rank test). For the combined treatment group versus control, P = 0.0002, when adjusted for multiple comparisons by using Dunnett’s test.

 
Regulation of COX-2 and PPAR{gamma} Expression and PG Synthesis.
The effects of F-L-Leu and/or celecoxib were examined on COX-1 and COX-2 and PPAR{gamma} expression in the rat mammary normal, uninvolved, and tumor tissues (Fig. 3)Citation and on the tissue levels of PGE2 and 15d-PGJ2 (Fig. 4)Citation . COX-1 expression was not affected by the test drugs in the three tissue types and was not changed significantly by MNU administration. As expected, COX-2 was undetectable in the normal tissue but was induced in response to MNU. Tumors exhibited 2-fold higher COX-2 expression compared with the uninvolved tissue (P > 0.05). F-L-Leu and celecoxib down-regulated COX-2 expression, respectively, by 2- and 3-fold in the tumor tissue, whereas combined treatment resulted in >6-fold decrease compared with the corresponding controls. In contrast to COX-2, PPAR{gamma} mRNA and protein signals were detected in all tissues but with varying intensities (Fig. 3)Citation . Tumors exhibited the lowest PPAR{gamma} expression compared with uninvolved (2-fold) or normal (4-fold) tissues. F-L-Leu and celecoxib, separately or in combination, exerted a modest up-regulation on PPAR{gamma} expression (~2- to 3-fold).



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 3. COX-1 and -2 and PPAR{gamma} mRNA (A) and protein (B) expression in the rat mammary glands in response to F-L-Leu and celecoxib treatments. Band intensities were adjusted for the corresponding ß-actin signals, and values are expressed as arbitrary density units. Expression levels represent means of three to four animals (A) or two rats (B) per group; bars, SD. Protein and mRNA expression levels were correlated across tissues and treatments (r2 varied from 0.67 for PPAR{gamma} to 0.77 for COX-2, P < 0.05). Statistical differences between groups were evaluated using the two-way ANOVA test. Ps showed significant differences in COX-2 and PPAR{gamma} levels (but not COX-1) among treatments and tissues (P < 0.01). When results were adjusted for multiple comparisons (Dunnett’s test), differences among the experimental groups were between the controls and the combined treatments in both MNU-treated or untreated rats (P < 0.05).

 


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 4. Changes in the tissue levels of PGE2 (A) and 15d-PGJ2 (B) in the rat mammary gland in response to F-L-Leu and celecoxib treatments. Data represent means (four to six animals/group); bars, SD. 15d-PGJ2 was not detected (nd) in the tumor tissues, i.e., below the limit of detection (0.1 ng/100 mg wet tissue). Statistical differences between experimental groups were evaluated using two-way ANOVA test. Ps showed significant differences in the levels of PGE2 and 15d-PGJ2 among treatments and tissues (P < 0.001). When results were adjusted for multiple comparison (Dunnett’s test), differences among the experimental groups were mainly between the controls and the combined treatments in both MNU-treated and untreated rats (P < 0.05).

 
Analysis of PG synthesis indicated that levels of PGE2 in tumors from drug-untreated rats were, respectively, 2- and 5-fold higher than uninvolved and normal tissues. Significant inhibition in PGE2 synthesis was attained in all tissues by F-L-Leu (~1.5-fold), celecoxib (~2-fold), and their combination (ranged from 4-fold in the MNU-treated tissues to 12-fold in the normal gland). The increases in PGE2 levels after MNU treatment was paralleled by inhibition in the synthesis of 15d-PGJ2 (which reached concentrations below the detection limit of 0.1 ng/100 mg tissue in the tumor). Both normal and uninvolved tissues exhibited increases in the 15d-PGJ2 in response to F-L-Leu (~2-fold), celecoxib (~2- to 3-fold), and their combination (>5-fold). Normal tissues had the highest responses to the drug-induced alterations in PG synthesis. Although levels of PGE2 (or 15d-PGJ2) were different (P < 0.001) among tissues and treatments, adjusting the data for multiple comparisons (Dunnett’s test) indicated that treatment-related differences exist mainly between controls and the groups that received combined treatment (P < 0.05).

Effect on Apoptotic Markers.
The effect of F-L-Leu and celecoxib on the expressions of the BAX, Bcl2, and PKC{alpha} were examined in the rat mammary normal, uninvolved, and tumor tissues (Fig. 5)Citation . Normal tissues from drug-untreated animals contained higher BAX (4- to 5-fold) and lower Bcl2 (2- to 3-fold) and PKC{alpha} (2- to 3-fold) than the corresponding uninvolved or tumor tissues. BAX expression was higher than Bcl2 in the normal glands (BAX:Bcl2 ratio >1), whereas Bcl2 was higher in the uninvolved and tumor tissues (BAX:Bcl2 ratio <1). This may be attributable to the significant (P < 0.05) induction of Bcl2 (and down-regulation of BAX) in response to MNU treatment (Fig. 5)Citation . F-L-Leu and celecoxib resulted in ~3-fold change in Bcl2 (decreases) and BAX (increases) expression when administered separately and in 3- to 5-fold altered expression when combined. Because BAX and Bcl2 play opposing roles in determining the net apoptosis, a ratio of BAX:Bcl2 was created as an indicator of the drug-induced proapoptotic effects (Fig. 6A)Citation . F-L-Leu and celecoxib, respectively, increased the pro-apoptotic ratio by 2- and 4-fold in the normal glands, 3- and 4-fold in the uninvolved tissues, and 4- to 7-fold in the tumors. Combined treatment, however, exerted higher increases in the BAX:Bcl2 ratio (P < 0.05) than separate treatments (>9-fold in the normal glands and >14-fold in the uninvolved or tumor tissues).



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 5. Bcl2, BAX and PKC{alpha} mRNA (A) and protein (B) expression in the rat mammary glands in response to F-L-Leu and celecoxib treatments. For experimental details and statistical differences, see Fig. 3Citation . Protein and mRNA expression levels were correlated across tissue types and treatments (r2 varied from 0.62 for Bcl2 to 0.8 for BAX, P < 0.05).

 


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 6. Changes in the proapoptotic BAX:Bcl2 ratio (A) and the antiapoptotic variable PKC{alpha}*Bcl2/BAX (B) in the rat mammary gland in response to F-L-Leu and celecoxib treatments. Pro- (A) and anti- (B) apoptotic variables were created from mRNA levels of Bcl2, BAX and PKC{alpha} (Fig. 5)Citation in the normal, uninvolved, and tumor tissues. Data (means of three to four animals/group; bars, SD) represent the ratio of arbitrary density units for BAX:Bcl2 or for PKC{alpha}*Bcl2/BAX adjusted for the corresponding ß-actin mRNA signals. Statistical differences between experimental groups were evaluated using the two-way ANOVA test. Ps showed significant differences in the pro- and antiapoptotic values among treatments and tissues (P < 0.01). When results were adjusted for multiple comparisons (Dunnett’s test), differences in the tumor tissue for BAX:Bcl2 ratio and in the normal tissue for PKC{alpha}*Bcl2/BAX among the experimental groups were mainly between the controls and the combined treatments in both MNU-treated and untreated rats (P < 0.05). Differences were significant among all treatments in other tissues (P < 0.05).

 
Separate administrations of F-L-Leu and celecoxib elicited >1.5-fold down-regulation in the PKC{alpha} expression in all tissues, whereas combining both agents induced higher decreases (P < 0.05) than in controls (2.5- to 3-fold) or separate treatments (2-fold). Because more PKC{alpha} promotes protection against apoptosis via influencing the activities of Bcl2 family members, the interactive factor PKC{alpha}*Bcl2/BAX was generated to consider this relationship and as an indicator of the drug-induced antiapoptotic effects (Fig. 6B)Citation . As expected, normal glands exhibited the lowest PKC{alpha}*Bcl2/BAX compared with other tissues (4-fold lower than uninvolved and 16-fold lower than tumors). F-L-Leu and celecoxib, respectively, reduced the antiapoptotic signaling by >2- and 5-fold in the normal glands, 3- and 6-fold in the uninvolved tissue, and >5- and >8-fold in the tumors. Compared with the corresponding controls, combined treatment elicited >14-fold lowering in the PKC{alpha}*Bcl2/BAX values in the normal tissue, 20-fold in the uninvolved tissue, and ~30-fold in the tumor tissue.

Effect on Markers of Cell Cycle and Proliferation.
The effect of F-L-Leu and/or celecoxib was also examined on markers of cell cycle regulation (cdk1) and cell proliferation (PCNA) in the rat mammary epithelial cells from normal, uninvolved, and tumor tissue (Fig. 7)Citation . Apparently, cdk1 protein was barely detectable in the resting normal mammary tissues, whereas PCNA was undetectable. Both cdk1 and PCNA were up-regulated as the tumor emerged. In the uninvolved tissues, cdk1 was detectable and PCNA was slightly induced. Over 10-fold induction in both markers occurred in the tumors compared with the uninvolved tissue. Both F-L-Leu and celecoxib reduced the expression of cdk1 and PCNA, particularly in the tumor tissue (~6-fold). Combined treatment exerted a higher down-regulation of cdk1 (~10-fold) and retained PCNA to the undetectable levels observed in the normal glands.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig. 7. Protein expression of markers of cell cycle (cdk1) and cell proliferation (PCNA) in the rat mammary gland in response to F-L-Leu and/or celecoxib treatments.

 

   DISCUSSION
Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
REFERENCES
 
COX-2 and PPAR{gamma} have emerged as promising candidate molecules for the prevention of breast cancer (2) . Evidence suggests that induction of COX-2 and inactivation and/or transcriptional down-regulation of PPAR{gamma} can be key components in the genesis of breast cancer (6 , 10) . In the present study, we examined the effect of a COX-2 inhibitor (celecoxib) and a PPAR{gamma} agonist (F-L-Leu), separately and in combination, on the development of rat mammary cancer. The toxicity profile of the test agents (Table 2)Citation is in general agreement with reports demonstrating no toxic reactions or weight changes in animals administered celecoxib (14) or F-L-Leu (41) at doses equivalent to those examined here. As noted previously for various COX-2 inhibitors (12, 13, 14) and PPAR{gamma} ligands (15, 16, 17) , celecoxib and F-L-Leu, separately, can inhibit rat mammary gland carcinoma (Table 2Citation ; Fig. 2Citation ). The present study, however, is the first demonstration that combined treatment with both classes of agents can exert an additive, if not synergistic, inhibition in mammary cancer (Table 2)Citation . Similar observations were reported for other combinational targeting protocols, e.g., PPAR{gamma} and estrogen receptor (15) or PPAR{gamma} and retinoid X receptor (16) .

Although COX-2 and PPAR{gamma} mediate different pathways, they modulate common molecular targets and may, therefore, synergistically inhibit cancer development (6) . To identify some of the molecular pathways involved in the anticancer potentials of COX-2 inhibitors and PPAR{gamma} ligands, we examined three different, but related, pathways for their response to drug treatment. These are: (a) direct drug-related pathway (COX-2, PPAR{gamma} and PG synthesis); (b) intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway (BAX and Bcl2 and their modulator PKC{alpha}); and (c) cell cycle regulation (cdk1) and proliferation (PCNA) pathways.

COX-2 inhibitors and PPAR{gamma} agonists down-regulated the expression of COX-2 and modestly up-regulated that of PPAR{gamma} (Fig. 3)Citation with a concurrent inhibition in PGE2 synthesis and increases in 15d-PGJ2 levels (Fig. 4)Citation . Several lines of evidence implicate an interrelationship between COX-2 and PPAR{gamma} pathways (6) . For example, COX-2 and PPAR{gamma} are inversely correlated in both rat (this study) and human (10) models. Moreover, activation of PPAR{gamma} inhibits COX-2 (50) , whereas inhibition of COX-2 activates PPAR{gamma} (51) . COX-2 inhibitors act as partial PPAR{gamma} agonists (52) , whereas PPAR{gamma} agonists partially inhibit COX-2 and PGE2 synthesis (5 , 53) . These observations may explain the moderate up-regulation of PPAR{gamma} expression by celecoxib and the inhibition of COX-2 by F-L-Leu in the mammary gland. Combinational treatment with COX-2 inhibitors and PPAR{gamma} ligands may, therefore, lead to a synergistic inhibition of COX-2 and activation or transcriptional up-regulation of PPAR{gamma} compared with separate treatments as observed in the present study.

COX-2 inhibitors and PPAR{gamma} agonists were thought to mediate their antitumorigenic effect coordinately via COX-2- and PPAR{gamma}-dependent mechanisms of action (reviewed in Ref. 6 ). In normal cells, COX-1 and PGD2 synthase trigger PGD2 and its PGJ metabolites to predominate and help maintain a quiescent state and active PPAR{gamma} status. In response to carcinogenic agents and during tumorigenesis, COX-2 is induced and switches cells over from PGD2 synthase-dominated PGs (e.g., 15d-PGJ2) to PGE2 synthesis. COX-2 inhibitors and PPAR{gamma} ligands inhibit PGE2 synthesis and switch the cell PG synthesis back to a PGD2 and PGJ series-dominated state. This interaction may explain the higher modulation in PG synthesis elicited by the simultaneous targeting of COX-2 and PPAR{gamma} compared with separate treatments.

In general, the up-regulation in PGJ2 synthesis (and activation PPAR{gamma}) and inhibition in COX-2 (and PGE2 synthesis) induced by the test drugs may influence cancer prevention by various mechanisms, including rendering cells more susceptible to apoptosis or attenuating cell growth and proliferation (6 , 23) . COX-2 induction and/or PPAR{gamma} inactivation increase(s) the resistance of mammary cells to apoptosis by up-regulating Bcl2 (31 , 32) and may, thereby, affect cancer development. The intrinsic apoptotic signaling mediated by Bcl2 family members (e.g., BAX and Bcl2) is an important factor in mammary normal development (18) as well as in breast carcinogenesis (see below). The interaction between BAX and Bcl2 dictates susceptibility to apoptosis and is implicated in breast cancer (19) , prognosis (25) , and chemoprevention (25) . Higher BAX:Bcl2 values indicate enhanced proapoptotic signaling or lower antiapoptotic processes (49 , 54) . In breast cancer, BAX:Bcl2 ratios are usually low, reflecting low pro-apoptotic rates (19) . In the present study we noted that BAX expression was higher than Bcl2 in the normal glands, whereas Bcl2 was higher in the cancerous tissues (Fig. 5)Citation . Celecoxib and/or F-L-Leu down-regulated Bcl2 expression and up-regulated BAX levels in all tissues. Consequently, the BAX:Bcl2 ratio was increased by 2- to 9-fold in the normal tissue and 4- to 14-fold in cancerous tissues. These alterations may, therefore, be involved in the proapoptotic effects of COX-2 inhibitors and PPAR{gamma} ligands and can mediate their antitumorigenic action.

In addition to the interaction between BAX and Bcl2 (29) , the activity of Bcl2 family members can be affected by their posttranslational modification with phosphorylation (33 , 55) , e.g., by PKC{alpha}. Forced expression of PKC{alpha} in human cells influenced the activity of Bcl2 (56) by increasing its phosphorylation, which led to >10-fold increased resistance to drug-induced cell death (33) . The overexpression of PKC{alpha} in human (57) and animal (this study) tumors may, therefore, reduce apoptotic rates via Bcl2 family members and, subsequently, hinder the pro-apoptotic effects of COX-2 inhibitors and PPAR{gamma} ligands. The multiplicative factor PKC{alpha}*Bcl2/BAX was considered previously (58 , 59) to predict the drug-induced effects on the prosurvival processes attributed to the PKC-Bcl2 signaling. Values of PKC{alpha}*Bcl2/BAX were 16-fold lower in the normal glands than in tumors. In agreement with previous findings for other COX-2 inhibitors (60) and PPAR{gamma} ligands (61) , in the present study, celecoxib, and F-L-Leu down-regulated PKC{alpha} expression and the PKC{alpha}*Bcl2/BAX factor in all tissues. The involvement of PKC{alpha} in the transcriptional regulation of COX-2 and PPAR{gamma} (62 , 63) implies that PKC{alpha} inhibition may avert further COX-2 induction and/or PPAR{gamma} inactivation during tumorigenesis. The relationship between the apoptotic potential of the test drugs and their anticancer activity suggests that COX-2 inhibitors and PPAR{gamma} ligands can be considered in apoptosis-inducing prevention or therapy. In fact, many cancer therapeutic (26, 27, 28) and preventive (24 , 29) agents exert their effect in target tissues primarily by inducing apoptosis.

Another possible mechanism by which COX-2 inhibitors and PPAR{gamma} ligands mediate their anti-cancer activity is via modulating the expression of factors involved in cell cycle regulation and proliferation (6) . For example, PPAR{gamma} ligands (36) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (64) markedly reduce the levels of Ki-67. Combining both classes of agents synergistically inhibits human breast cancer cell cycle progression (32) . PCNA, another marker of cell proliferation (65) , is abundant in the rapidly growing cells (preneoplastic and malignant) and can be significantly up-regulated (>10-fold) in mammary tumors of both human (66) and animal (67 , this study) models. The marked decrease in the PCNA levels after F-L-Leu or celecoxib treatment in the rat mammary tumors (Fig. 7)Citation was shown previously to be dose dependent for other PPAR{gamma} ligands (34) and COX-2 inhibitors (35) , which may explain the higher effect elicited by combinational treatment on PCNA compared with separate administrations (Fig. 7)Citation .

The increase in PCNA during tumorigenesis is usually accompanied by induction in genes/proteins involved in cell cycle (68) . An important player in cell cycle regulation is cdk1. It is required twice during the cell cycle, first in the G1 phase for onset of S-phase and again in G2 for onset of mitosis (69) . Increased activity and expression of cdk1 occur in several types of human cancer (70, 71, 72) and in rat mammary tumor (Fig. 7)Citation . F-L-Leu and celecoxib, separately and in combination, down-regulated cdk1 expression (Fig. 7)Citation and increased its phosphorylation, which resulted in ~2-fold inhibition in the activity (data not shown). Similar to other anticancer agents, e.g., genistein (73) , COX-2 inhibitors and PPAR{gamma} ligands seem to mediate their action by interacting with cdk1 to attenuate the transition of G1 to S-phase and/or G2 to M phase. In support, we reported earlier that the test drugs accumulate human breast cancer cells in the G0-G1 phase (32) and, therefore, may exert their effects during early cell cycle (i.e., G1 to S-phase). The drug-induced effects on the cell cycle are usually paralleled by increases in the apoptotic rates (32 , 74 , 75) . When these effects occur concurrently with inhibition of COX-2, modulation of PG synthesis and activation of PPAR{gamma}, some of the mechanisms by which COX-2 inhibitors and PPAR{gamma} ligands exert their anticancer effects may be elucidated.

In conclusion, simultaneous targeting of COX-2 and PPAR{gamma} inhibited mammary cancer development more effectively (and possibly synergistically) than targeting each molecule alone. COX-2 inhibitors and PPAR{gamma} agonists appear to mediate their action on mammary tumorigenesis by both COX-dependent and -independent mechanisms. COX-independent pathways implicated in the cancer preventive activity of these agents include concurrent inhibition of cell growth and induction in apoptotic rates. Further studies are warranted to examine the simultaneous targeting of COX-2 and PPAR{gamma} in apoptosis-inducing therapy and in the prevention of human breast cancer.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Marie Maradeo for technical assistance.


   FOOTNOTES
 
Grant support: Grants CA06927, CA-97473, and CA57708 (to A. F. Badawi) from National Cancer Institute and by an appropriation from the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Requests for reprints: Alaa F. Badawi, Division of Population Science, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 7701 Burholme Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111. Phone: (215) 214-1407; Fax: (215) 214-1622; E-mail: af_badawi{at}fccc.edu

Received 8/17/03. Revised 11/13/03. Accepted 11/21/03.


   REFERENCES
Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Jemal A., Murray T., Samuels A., Ghafoor A., Ward E., Thun M. J. Cancer statistics, 2003. CA Cancer J. Clin., 53: 5-26, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Sporn M. B., Suh N. Chemoprevention of cancer. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 21: 525-530, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Vane J. R., Bakhle Y. S., Botting R. M. Cyclooxygenases 1 and 2. Annu. Rev. Toxicol., 38: 97-120, 1998.
  4. Issemann I., Green S. Activation of a member of the steroid hormone receptor superfamily by peroxisome proliferators. Nature (Lond.), 347: 645-650, 1990.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Gelman L., Fruchart J-C., Auwerx J. An update on the mechanisms of action of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) and their roles in inflammation and cancer. Cell Mol. Life Sci., 55: 832-843, 1999.
  6. Badawi A. F., Badr M. Z. Chemoprevention of breast cancer by targeting cyclooxygenase-2 and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-{gamma}. Int. J. Oncol., 20: 1109-1122, 2002.[Medline]
  7. Parrett M. L., Harris R. E., Joarder F. S., Ross M. S., Clausen K. P., Robertson H. I. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in human breast cancer. Int. J. Oncol., 10: 503-507, 1997.
  8. Hwang D., Scollard D., Byrne J., Levine E. Expression of cyclooxygenase-1 and cyclooxygenase-2 in human breast cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 90: 455-460, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Ristimäki A., Sivula A., Lundin J., Lundin M., Salminen T., Haglund C., Joensuu H., Isola J. Prognostic significance of elevated cyclooxygenase-2 expression in breast cancer. Cancer Res., 62: 632-635, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Badawi A. F., Badr M. Z. Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-{gamma} and levels of prostaglandin E2 and 15-deoxy-{Delta}12, 14-prostaglandin J2 in human breast cancer and metastasis. Int. J. Cancer, 103: 84-90, 2003.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Jiang W. G., Douglas-Jones A., Mansel R. E. Expression of peroxisome-proliferator activated receptor{gamma} (PPAR{gamma}) and the PPAR{gamma} co-activator, PGC-1, in human breast cancer correlates with clinical outcomes. Int. J. Cancer, 106: 752-757, 2003.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Harris E. R., Alshafie G. A., Abou-Issa H., Seibert K. Chemoprevention of breast cancer in rats by celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor. Cancer Res., 60: 2101-2103, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Lu S., Zhang X., Badawi A. F., El-Sohemy A., Archer M. C. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor celecoxib inhibits promotion of mammary tumorigenesis in rats fed a high fat diet rich in n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids. Cancer Lett., 181: 7-12, 2002.
  14. Abou-Issa H. M., Alshafie G. A., Siebert K., Koki A., Masferrer J. L., Harris R. E. Dose-response effects of COX-2 inhibitor, celecoxib, on the chemoprevention of mammary carcinogenesis. Anticancer Res., 21: 3425-3432, 2001.[Medline]
  15. Suh N., Wang Y., Williams C. R., Risingsong R., Gilmer T., Willson T. M., Sporn M. B. A new ligand for the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-{gamma} (PPAR-{gamma}), GW7845, inhibits rat mammary carcinogenesis. Cancer Res., 59: 5671-5673, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Mehta R. G., Williamson E., Patel M. K., Koeffler H. P. A ligand of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma}, retinoids, and prevention of preneoplastic mammary lesions. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 92: 418-423, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Pighetti G. M., Novosad W., Nicholson C., Hiti D. C., Hansens C., Hollingsworth A. B., Lerner M. L., Brackett D., Lightfoot S. A., Gimble J. M. Therapeutic treatment of DMBA-induced mammary tumors with PPAR ligands. Anticancer Res., 21: 825-830, 2001.[Medline]
  18. Russo I. H., Russo J. Mammary gland neoplasia in long-term rodent studies. Environ. Health Perspect., 104: 938-967, 1996.[Medline]
  19. Kumar R., Vadlamudi R. K., Adam L. Apoptosis in mammary gland and cancer. Endocrin. Related Cancer, 7: 257-269, 2000.
  20. Heermeier K., Benedict M., Li M., Furth P., Nunez G., Hennighausen L. Bax and Bcl-XS are induced at the onset of apoptosis in involuting mammary epithelial cells. Mech. Dev., 56: 197-207, 1996.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Bargou R. C., Daniel P. T., Mapara M. Y., Bommert K., Wagener C., Kallinich B., Royer H. D., Dorken B. Expression of the bcl-2 gene family in normal and malignant breast tissue: low bax-{alpha} expression in tumor cells correlates with resistance towards apoptosis. Int. J. Cancer, 60: 854-859, 1995.[Medline]
  22. Krajewski S., Thor A. D., Edgerton S. M., Moore D. H., Krajewska M., Reed J. C. Analysis of Bax and Bcl-2 expression in p53-immunopositive breast cancers. Clin. Cancer Res., 3: 199-208, 1997.[Abstract]
  23. Kapranos N., Karaiosifdi H., Valavanis C., Kouri E., Vasilaros S. Prognostic significance of apoptosis related proteins Bcl-2 and Bax in node-negative breast cancer patients. Anticancer Res., 17: 2499-2505, 1997.[Medline]
  24. Shilkaitis A., Graves J., Mehta R. R., Hu L., You M., Lubet R., Steele V., Kelloff G., Christov K. Bcl-2 and Bax are differentially expressed in hyperplastic, premalignant, and malignant lesions of mammary carcinogenesis. Cell Growth Differ., 11: 437-445, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Veronese S., Mauri F. A., Caffo O., Scaioli M., Aldovini D., Perrone G., Galligioni E., Doglioni C., Dalla Palma P., Barbareschi M. Bax immunohistochemical expression in breast carcinoma: a study with long term follow-up. Int. J. Cancer, 79: 13-18, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Hickman J. A. Apoptosis induced by anti-cancer drugs. Cancer Metastasis Rev., 11: 121-139, 1992.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Thompson C. B. Apoptosis in pathogenesis and treatment of disease. Science (Wash. DC), 267: 1456-1462, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Strobel T., Kraeft S. K., Chen L. B., Cannistra S. A. Bax expression is associated with enhanced intracellular accumulation of paclitaxel: a novel role for Bax during chemotherapy-induced cell death. Cancer Res., 58: 4776-4781, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Srivastava P., Russo J., Russo I. Chorionic gonadotropin inhibits rat mammary carcinogenesis through activation of programmed cell death. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 18: 1799-1808, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Tsujii M., DuBois R. N. Alteration in cellular adhesion and apoptosis in epithelial cells over-expressing prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase 2. Cell, 83: 493-501, 1995.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Elsner E., Muller C., Koshizuka K., Williamson E. A., Park D., Asou H., Shintaku P., Said J. W., Heber D., Koeffler P. Ligands for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} and retinoic acid receptor inhibit growth and induce apoptosis of human breast cancer cells in vitro and in BNX mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95: 8806-8811, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Michael M. S., Badr M. Z., Badawi A. F. Inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 and activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-{gamma} synergistically induces apoptosis and inhibits growth of human breast cancer cells. Int. J. Mol. Med., 11: 733-736, 2003.[Medline]
  33. May W. S., Tyler P. G., Ito T., Armstrong D. K., Qatasha K. A., Davidson N. E. Interleukin-3 and bryostatin-1 mediate hyperphosphorylation of BCL2{alpha} in association with suppression of apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem., 269: 26865-26870, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Kohno H., Suzuki R., Noguchi R., Hosokawa M., Miyashita K., Tanaka T. Dietary conjugated linolenic acid inhibits azoxymethane-induced colonic aberrant crypt foci in rats. Jpn. J. Cancer Res., 93: 133-142, 2002.[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Cheng J., Imanishi H., Amuro Y., Hada T. NS-398, a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, inhibited cell growth and induced cell cycle arrest in human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines. Int. J. Cancer, 99: 755-761, 2002.[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Demetri G. D., Fletcher C. D., Mueller E., Sarraf P., Naujoks R., Campbell N., Spiegelman B. M., Singer S. Induction of solid tumor differentiation by the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-{gamma} ligand troglitazone in patients with liposarcoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96: 3951-3956, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Rodriguez-Burford C., Barnes M. N., Oelschlager D. K., Myers R. B., Talley L. I., Partridge E. E., Grizzle W. E. Effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs) on ovarian carcinoma cell lines: preclinical evaluation of NSAIDs as chemopreventive agents. Clin. Cancer Res., 8: 202-209, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Tegeder I., Pfeilschifter J., Geisslinger G. Cyclooxygenase-independent actions of cyclooxygenase inhibitors. FASEB J., 15: 2057-2072, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Thompson H. J., McGinley J. N., Rothhammer K., Singh M. Rapid induction of mammary intraductal proliferation, ductal carcinoma in situ and carcinomas by injection of sexually immature female rats with 1-methyl-1-nitrosourea. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 16: 2407-2411, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Badawi A. F., El-Sohemy A., Stephen L. L., Ghoshal A. K., Archer M. C. Effects of dietary n-3 and n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids on the expression of cyclooxygenase-1 and -2 and p21ras in rat mammary glands. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 19: 905-910, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Rocchi S., Picard F., Vamecq J., Gelman L., Potier N., Zeyer D., Dubuquoy L., Bac P., Champy M. F., Plunket K. D., Leesnitzer L. M., Blanchard S. G., Desreumaux P., Moras D., Renaud J. P., Auwerx J. A unique PPAR{gamma} ligand with potent insulin-sensitizing yet weak adipogenic activity. Mol. Cell, 8: 737-747, 2001.[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Badawi A. F., Archer M. C. Effect of hormonal status on the expression of the cyclooxygenase 1 and 2 genes and prostaglandin synthesis in rat mammary gland. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat., 56: 167-181, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Vogiagis D., Glare E. M., Misajon A., Brown W., O’Brien P. E. Cyclooxygenase-1 and an alternatively spliced mRNA in the rat stomach: effects of aging and ulcers. Am. J. Physiol., 278: G820-G827, 2000.
  44. Gimble J. M., Pighetti G. M., Lerner M. R., Wu X., Lightfoot S. A., Brackett D. J., Darcy K., Hollingsworth A. B. Expression of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor mRNA in normal and tumorigenic rodent mammary glands. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 253: 813-817, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Hiroyasu S., Shiraishi M., Koji T., Mamadi T., Sugawa H., Muto Y. Analysis of the Fas system and Bcl-2 in rat liver allograft rejection. J. Surg. Res., 84: 204-211, 1999.[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. Davis C. D., Johnson W. T. Dietary copper affects azoxymethane-induced intestinal tumor formation and protein kinase C isozyme protein and mRNA expression in colon of rats. J. Nutr., 132: 1018-1025, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Konturek P. C., Brzozowski T., Pierzchalski P., Kwiecien S., Pajdo R., Hahn E. G., Konturek S. J. Activation of genes for spasmolytic peptide, transforming growth factor {alpha} and for cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 and COX-2 during gastric adaptation to aspirin damage in rats. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther., 12: 767-777, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. Bradford M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem., 72: 248-254, 1976.[CrossRef][Medline]
  49. Oltvai Z. N., Milliman C. L., Korsmeyer S. J. Bcl-2 heterodimerizes in vivo with a conserved homolog, Bax, that accelerates programmed cell death. Cell, 74: 609-619, 1993.[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. Yang W-L., Frucht H. Activation of the PPAR pathway induces apoptosis and COX-2 inhibition in HT-29 human colon cancer cells. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 22: 1379-1383, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Clay C. E., Namen A. M., Atsumi G., Willingham M. C., High K. P., Kute T. E., Trimboli A. J., Fonteh A. N., Dawson P. A., Chilton F. H. Influence of J series prostaglandins on apoptosis and tumorigenesis of breast cancer cells. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 20: 1905-1911, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Lehman J. M., Lenhard J. M., Oliver B. B., Ringold G. M., Kliewer S. A. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors {alpha} and {gamma} are activated by indomethacin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. J. Biol. Chem., 272: 3406-3410, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Subbaramaiah K., Lin D. T., Hart J. C., Dannenberg A. J. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} ligands suppress the transcriptional activation of cyclooxygenase-2. Evidence for involvement of activator protein-1 and CREB-binding protein/p300. J. Biol. Chem., 276: 12440-12448, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Yang E., Korsmeyer S. J. Molecular thanatopsis: a discourse on the BCL2 family and cell death. Blood, 88: 386-401, 1996.[Free Full Text]
  55. Ito T., Deng X., Carr B. K., Struss E. Bcl-2 phosphorylation required for anti-apoptosis function. J. Biol. Chem., 272: 11671-11673, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Ruvolo P. P., Deng X., Carr B. K., May W. S. A functional role for mitochondrial protein kinase C-{alpha} in bcl2 phosphorylation and suppression of apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem., 273: 25436-25442, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Fournier D. B., Chisamore M., Lurain J. R., Rademaker A. W., Jordan V. C., Tonetti D. A. Protein kinase C {alpha} expression is inversely related to ER status in endometrial carcinoma: possible role in AP-1-mediated proliferation of ER-negative endometrial cancer. Gynecol. Oncol., 81: 366-372, 2001.[CrossRef][Medline]
  58. Martinez-Arribas F., Nunez-Villar M. J., Lucas A. R., Sanchez J., Tejerina A., Schneider J. Immunofluorometric study of Bcl-2 and Bax expression in clinical fresh tumor samples from breast cancer patients. Anticancer Res., 23: 565-568, 2003.[Medline]
  59. Kornblau S. M., Vu H. T., Ruvolo P., Estrov Z., O’Brien S., Cortes J., Kantarjian H., Andreeff M., May W. S. BAX and PKC{alpha} modulate the prognostic impact of BCL2 expression in acute myelogenous leukemia. Clin. Cancer Res., 6: 1401-1409, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Claus R., Fyrnys B., Deigner H. P., Wolf G. Oxidized low-density lipoprotein stimulates protein kinase C (PKC) and induces expression of PKC-isotypes via prostaglandin-H-synthase in P388D1 macrophage-like cells. Biochemistry, 35: 4911-4922, 1996.[CrossRef][Medline]
  61. Wakino S., Kintscher U., Liu Z., Kim S., Yin F., Ohba M., Kuroki T., Schonthal A. H., Hsueh W. A., Law R. E. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} ligands inhibit mitogenic induction of p21Cip1 by modulating the protein kinase C pathway in vascular smooth muscle cells. J. Biol. Chem., 276: 47650-47657, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Simonson M. S., Wolfe J. A., Konieczkowski M., Sedor J. R., Dunn M. J. Regulation of prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase gene expression in cultured rat mesangial cells: induction by serum via a protein kinase-C-dependent mechanism. Mol. Endocrinol., 5: 441-451, 1991.[Abstract]
  63. Okumura M., Yamamoto M., Sakuma H., Kojima T., Maruyama T., Jamali M., Cooper D., Yasuda K. Leptin and high glucose stimulate cell proliferation in MCF-7 breast cancer cells: reciprocal involvement of PKC{alpha} and PPAR expression. Biochem. Biophys. Acta, 1592: 107-116, 2002.[Medline]
  64. Reinacher-Schick A., Seidensticker F., Petrasch S., Reiser M., Philippou S., Theegarten D., Freitag G., Schmiegel W. Mesalazine changes apoptosis and proliferation in normal mucosa of patients with sporadic polyps of the large bowel. Endoscopy, 32: 245-254, 2000.[CrossRef][Medline]
  65. Celis J. E., Bravo R., Larson P. M., Fey S. J. Cyclin: a nuclear protein whose levels correlate directly with the proliferative state of normal as well as transformed cells. Leuk. Res., 8: 143-157, 1984.[CrossRef][Medline]
  66. Mao Y., Wu J., Wang N., He L., Wu C., He Q., Skog S. A comparative study: immunohistochemical detection of cytosolic thymidine kinase and proliferating cell nuclear antigen in breast cancer. Cancer Invest., 20: 922-931, 2002.[CrossRef][Medline]
  67. Liu Y. C., Bambara R. A. Gene expression of PCNA/cyclin in adult tissues and the R3230AC mammary tumor of rat. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 161: 873-882, 1989.[CrossRef][Medline]
  68. Pandey S., Wang E. Cells en route to apoptosis are characterized by the upregulation of c-fos, c-myc, c-jun, cdc2, and RB phosphorylation, resembling events of early cell-cycle traverse. J. Cell Biochem., 58: 135-150, 1995.[CrossRef][Medline]
  69. Nurse P., Bissett Y. Gene required in G1 for commitment to cell cycle and in G2 for control of mitosis in fission yeast. Nature (Lond.), 292: 558-560, 1981.[CrossRef][Medline]
  70. Frey R. S., Li J., Singletary K. W. Effects of genistein on cell proliferation and cell cycle arrest in nonneoplastic human mammary epithelial cells: involvement of Cdc2, p21waf/cip1, p27kip1, and Cdc25C expression. Biochem. Pharmcol., 61: 979-989, 2001.[CrossRef]