| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Advances in Brief |
1 Department of Pathology, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; 2 Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; 3 Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; 4 Department of Pathology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska; 5 Department of Pathology, Childrens Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; and 6 Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
BAC clones were obtained from Childrens Hospital Oakland Research Institute (Oakland, CA) and Research Genetics (Huntsville, AL). DNA isolation was performed according to a previously reported protocol (7) . After overnight bacterial growth, cell pellets were digested (25 mM Tris-HCL, 50 mM glucose, 10 mM EDTA, 5 mg/ml lysozyme, and 200 µg/ml RNase), and the DNA was precipitated with 5 M potassium acetate and 100% ethanol. BAC DNA was labeled by random priming with either digoxigenin- or biotin-modified nucleotides using the BioPrime DNA Labeling System (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), purified by chromatography using S-200HR MicroSpin columns (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ), coprecipitated with 0.3 µg/ml glycogen, 2.5 M ammonium acetate, and 2 volumes of 100% ethanol, and resuspended with hybridization buffer (50% formamide, 10% dextrose sulfate, and 2x SSC) and Cot-1 DNA (Invitrogen).
Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH) Mapping.
Metaphase harvesting, slide preparation, and trypsin-Giemsa staining for cytogenetic analyses were performed as described previously (8)
. Dual color FISH and probe detection were performed, as described, using FITC-antidigoxigenin and Alexa Fluor 594-streptavidin (Molecular Probe, Eugene, OR; Ref. 9
). Images were captured using a liquid cooled CCD camera (Photometrics, Tucson, AZ).
RNA Isolation, Reverse Transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), and cDNA Sequencing.
RNA was isolated from frozen tissue material after mechanical homogenization and overnight incubation in Trizol (Invitrogen) at 4°C. RNA reverse transcription into cDNA was performed using the GeneAmp RNA PCR kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) for 2 h at 42°C using random hexamers. All PCR reactions were performed using the Takara Ex Taq kit with the following parameters for 35 cycles: denaturation at 94°C for 30 s; annealing at 65°C for 30 s; and extension at 72°C for 1 min. The PCR primers included CDH11+83F (5'-GTGAATGGGACCGGGACT-3') and USP6+1781R (5'-CTCGGTGTCCCTTGTCATACTT-3'). The PCR products were gel purified using the QIAquick Gel Extraction kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and sequenced using an ABI PRISM 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Identification of CDH11-USP6 Fusion Transcript Breakpoints.
CDH11 is expressed strongly in mesenchymal cells, particularly those of osteoblastic differentiation, whereas USP6 expression is expressed predominantly in germ cells (10
, 11)
. These known expression profiles, together with the genomic FISH localizations, were most consistent with fusion oncogenes composed of the CDH11 5' untranslated region and the entire USP6 coding sequence. The possibility of CDH11-USP6 fusion transcripts was evaluated in eight ABCsfour of which had t(16;17)by RT-PCR with a CDH11 exon 1 forward primer (CDH11+83F) and a USP6 exon 2/3 reverse primer (USP6+1781R). CDH11-USP6 fusion products were identified only in the ABC with t(16;17). RT-PCR gel electrophoresis and sequence analyses revealed alternative splicing at the CDH11-USP6 breakpoint region in the ABC with t(16;17), and we refer to the different splicing products as CDH11-USP6 types 15 (Fig. 2, A and B)
. In type 1, the CDH11 noncoding exon 1 was fused to part of the USP6 noncoding exon 1; in type 2, CDH11 exon 1 was fused to USP6 coding exon 2; in type 3, the CDH11 noncoding exon 2 was fused to the same part of the USP6 non-coding exon 1, as described for type 1; in type 4, CDH11 exon 2 was fused to USP6 exon 2; and in type 5, CDH11 exon 2 was fused to a 58-bp alternate exon upstream of USP6 exon 1 (GenBank accession nos. AY380226, AY38025, AY380223, AY380224, and AY380222, respectively). The fusion breakpoints in all five splicing variants were before the start of the CDH11 coding sequence (CDH11 exon 3) and preserved the USP6 ATG initiation codon, which begins at the second nucleotide of USP6 exon 2. RT-PCR for the reciprocal fusion product (USP6-CDH11) was repeatedly negative in all ABC with cytogenetic t(16;17), suggesting that the CDH11 coding sequences are not essential to the ABC transforming mechanism.
|
The specificity of the CDH11-USP6 fusion transcript was evaluated by performing RT-PCR for CHD11-USP6 fusion, and dual-color split apart FISH for CDH11 and USP6 rearrangement in various osseous and nonosseous tumors (Fig. 2A
and Table 2
). These studies showed no evidence of CDH11 or USP6 rearrangement in any of the non-ABC tumors.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, we demonstrate that the recurrent chromosomal translocation t(16;17)(q22;p13) leads to fusion of the promoter region of the osteoblast cadherin gene CDH11 to the entire coding sequence of the ubiquitin-specific protease USP6 (also known as Tre2). CDH11 maps at the 16q21-q22.1 chromosome band interface and is a member of a large family of cell surface glycoproteins involved in Ca2+-dependent cell-cell adhesion (12) . CDH11 was cloned by Okazaki et al. (11) from mouse osteoblast and human osteosarcoma cell lines and is highly expressed in osteoblastic cell lines, osteoblast precursors, and primary osteoblastic cells. Data suggest a relationship between CDH11 expression and neoplastic aggressiveness (13, 14, 15) . As an example, Feltes et al. (13) have recently shown that coexpression of a CDH11 splicing variant and the wild-type CDH11 promotes breast cancer cell invasion. Notably, although those studies highlight potential oncogenic roles for CDH11, no CDH11 coding sequence is preserved in the CDH11-USP6 fusion transcripts in ABC. Rather, our findings indicate that the role of CDH11 in the CDH11-USP6 fusion transcript is to provide a highly active promoter, thereby contributing to USP6 transcriptional up-regulation. Our data also suggest that related oncogenic mechanisms apply in ABC cases 57, which lack t(16;17) but which have rearrangement of one region (16q22 or 17p13) or the other.
USP6 is a ubiquitin-specific protease that was cloned from NIH3T3 transformants after transfection with cDNA from human Ewing sarcoma (16 , 17) . Although originally mapped to the pericentromeric region of the chromosome 17 long arm, more recent studies have localized USP6 to the short arm at chromosome band 17p13. Interestingly, USP6 is a hominoid-specific gene that arose from an evolutionary chimeric gene fusion between the TBC1D3 (also known as PRC17) and USP32 (NY-REN-60) genes, which are both located on the long arm of chromosome 17 (10) . Because USP6 is absent in nonhominoid primates and is primarily expressed in testicular tissue, Paulding et al. (10) have suggested that USP6 contributed to hominoid speciation.
USP6 has an extremely high degree of sequence conservation with the two component genes (TBC1D3 and USP32) from which it arose. Sequence comparisons indicate that the first 14 exons of USP6 are derived from TBC1D3(PRC17), whereas exons 1530 are derived from USP32 (10) . TBC1D3(PRC17) is located at chromosome band 17q12 and encodes a protein with a TBC/GAP domain involved in Rab/Ypt GTPase signaling. USP32 is located at chromosome band 17q23 and encodes a protein composed of two EF-hand calcium-binding motifs, a myristoylation site, and a UBP domain. USP6 protein retains the TBC domain of TBC1D3(PRC17) and the UBP domain of USP32.
In ABC with t(16;17), the genomic breakpoint at chromosome band 16q22 occurs in intron 2 of CDH11, therefore upstream to its coding sequence, which starts within CDH11 exon 3. Similarly, the genomic breakpoint on chromosome 17p13 occurs upstream of the USP6 coding sequence, which starts at the second nucleotide of USP6 exon 2. Although our studies demonstrate several splicing variants for the CDH11-USP6 fusion region, each of these preserves the known USP6 open reading frame. In addition, CDH11-USP6 fusion transcripts, but not reciprocal USP6-CDH11 transcripts, were demonstrated consistently in ABC with t(16;17). These findings indicate that USP6 overexpression results from juxtaposition to the highly active CDH11 promoter in ABC with t(16;17). This oncogenic mechanism, sometimes referred to as promoter-swapping, has precedent in several other tumors, including salivary gland adenomas and lipoblastoma (9 , 18) .
Notably, USP6 overexpression has been shown to transform mesenchymal cells. Nakamura et al. (16) demonstrated that NIH3T3 fibroblast-lineage cells were transformed by a natural USP6 transcript with only a partial UBP domain. By contrast, USP6 transcripts with the entire UBP domain did not exhibit transforming activity in this assay (10) . These findings suggest that the TBC domain in USP6 might have oncogenic function, whereas the more COOH-terminal UBP domain might have tumor suppressor properties. A recent study by Pei et al. (19) is consistent with this hypothesis. These authors showed that TBC1D3(PRC17) is amplified in prostate cancer andas with the shorter splicing variant of USP6capable of transforming NIH3T3 cells. In addition, point mutations that modified conserved amino acids in the TBC domain inhibited TBC1D3(PRC17) transforming activity (19) . These observations suggest that overexpression of the TBC1D3 or USP6 TBC domains can transform mesenchymal cells.
In summary, our studies demonstrate fusion of the promoter region of the osteoblast cadherin gene CDH11 to the entire coding sequence of the ubiquitin-specific protease gene USP6, resulting from the recurrent ABC translocation t(16;17)(q22;p13). Furthermore, some ABCs have translocations targeting either CDH11 or USP6 in the absence of CDH11-USP6, indicating the presence of variant fusion oncogenes. The fusion transcript CDH11-USP6 appears to be specific for ABC, and the oncogenic mechanism likely involves transcriptional up-regulation of USP6.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Requests for reprints: Jonathan A. Fletcher, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Womens Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail: amoliveira{at}partners.org or jfletcher{at}partners.org
Received 9/ 8/03. Revised 12/17/03. Accepted 12/24/03.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. M. Oliveira, M. M. Chou, A. R. Perez-Atayde, and A. E. Rosenberg Aneurysmal Bone Cyst: A Neoplasm Driven by Upregulation of the USP6 Oncogene J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2006; 24(1): e1 - e1. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Shen, Y. Ye, S. E. Robertson, A. W. Lau, D.-O. D. Mak, and M. M. Chou Calcium/Calmodulin Regulates Ubiquitination of the Ubiquitin-specific Protease TRE17/USP6 J. Biol. Chem., October 28, 2005; 280(43): 35967 - 35973. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Martinu, J. M. Masuda-Robens, S. E. Robertson, L. C. Santy, J. E. Casanova, and M. M. Chou The TBC (Tre-2/Bub2/Cdc16) Domain Protein TRE17 Regulates Plasma Membrane-Endosomal Trafficking through Activation of Arf6 Mol. Cell. Biol., November 15, 2004; 24(22): 9752 - 9762. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Oliveira, A. R. Perez-Atayde, C. Y. Inwards, F. Medeiros, V. Derr, B.-L. Hsi, M. C. Gebhardt, A. E. Rosenberg, and J. A. Fletcher USP6 and CDH11 Oncogenes Identify the Neoplastic Cell in Primary Aneurysmal Bone Cysts and Are Absent in So-Called Secondary Aneurysmal Bone Cysts Am. J. Pathol., November 1, 2004; 165(5): 1773 - 1780. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |