Cancer Research Meeting Calendar  Sign up for Cancer Research eTOC's
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ogbourne, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Parsons, P. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ogbourne, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Parsons, P. G.
[Cancer Research 64, 2833-2839, April 15, 2004]
© 2004 American Association for Cancer Research


Regular Articles

Antitumor Activity of 3-Ingenyl Angelate

Plasma Membrane and Mitochondrial Disruption and Necrotic Cell Death

Steven M. Ogbourne1, Andreas Suhrbier2, Brad Jones1, Sarah-Jane Cozzi1, Glen M. Boyle1, Melanie Morris1, Devi McAlpine1, Jenny Johns1, Tania M. Scott1, Kirsty P. Sutherland1, Joy M. Gardner2, Thuy T. T. Le2, Aleksandra Lenarczyk2, James H. Aylward3 and Peter G. Parsons1

1 Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Melanoma Genomics Group, Brisbane; 2 Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Infectious Disease Unit, Brisbane; and 3 Peplin Biotech Ltd, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Options for skin cancer treatment currently include surgery, radiotherapy, topical chemotherapy, cryosurgery, curettage, and electrodessication. Although effective, surgery is costly and unsuitable for certain patients. Radiotherapy can leave a poor cosmetic effect, and current chemotherapy is limited by low cure rates and extended treatment schedules. Here, we describe the preclinical activity of a novel topical chemotherapeutic agent for the treatment of skin cancer, 3-ingenyl angelate (PEP005), a hydrophobic diterpene ester isolated from the plant Euphorbia peplus. Three daily topical applications of 42 nmol (18 µg) of PEP005 cured a series of s.c. mouse tumors (B16 melanoma, LK2 UV-induced squamous cell carcinoma, and Lewis lung carcinoma; n = >14 tumors/group) and human tumors (DO4 melanoma, HeLa cervical carcinoma, and PC3 and DU145 prostate carcinoma; n = >4 tumors/group) previously established (5–10 mm3) on C57BL/6 or Foxn1nu mice. The treatment produced a mild, short-term erythema and eschar formation but, ultimately, resulted in excellent skin cosmesis. The LD90 for PEP005 for a panel of tumor cell lines was 180–220 µM. Electron microscopy showed that treatment with PEP005 both in vitro (230 µM) and in vivo (42 nmol) rapidly caused swelling of mitochondria and cell death by primary necrosis. 51Cr release, uptake of propidium iodide, and staining with the mitochondria dye JC1, revealed that PEP005 (230 µM) treatment of tumor cells in vitro resulted in a rapid plasma membrane perturbation and loss of mitochondrial membrane potential. PEP005 thus emerges as a new topical anti-skin cancer agent that has a novel mode of action involving plasma membrane and mitochondrial disruption and primary necrosis, ultimately resulting in an excellent cosmetic outcome.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Skin cancer is the most common form of cancer. Approximately 1 million new cases of skin cancer are predicted to be diagnosed in the United States in 2003, with 9800 of these likely to result in death. The majority of skin cancers are basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) and squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs; Ref. 1 ). During the mid-1990s, skin cancer cost the American Medicare system close to 1 billion $US/year, a figure that is rapidly increasing (2) . The overall cost to United States society has been estimated at closer to US$ 2.5 billion/year (2) .

Surgical excision is the most common and most successful treatment for localized primary skin lesions. A review of 10 studies showed a 5-year recurrence rate of 10.1% for BCC lesions after surgery (3) , although recurrence rates are significantly higher for lesions >2 cm in diameter, for lesions in the head, neck, and face regions and for nodular rather than superficial lesions (4 , 5) . The 5-year recurrence rates for previously untreated primary SCC lesions after surgery are reported to be 8.1%, but this rises to 23.3% if the lesions had previously failed other treatments (6) . Surgery is expensive (2) , may not be the treatment of choice in cosmetically sensitive locations (7) , and is limited by the proximity of essential anatomical structures (8) . In these settings and when primary closure is difficult (large lesions or low skin redundancy), skin grafting or other reconstructive surgery may be required. Surgery may also be complicated for the significant number of patients with multiple lesions (9) .

Electrodessication, curettage, and cryosurgery (10) are widely used for selected BCCs and, in skilled hands, a recurrence rate of only 5–10% can be obtained (3 , 11) . However, treatment usually needs to be repeated to accomplish complete removal of superficial tumors. There is also a possibility of hypopigmentation and delay in wound healing; importantly, success relies heavily on the skill of the practitioner (7 , 12) .

Radiotherapy is often chosen for primary lesions that would normally require extensive or difficult surgery (such as lesions near eyelids and nose), is generally restricted to a single course of treatment in any one field, and cannot be used for multiple lesions in scattered locations. The 5-year recurrence rates for radiotherapy have been reported at 8.7% for BCCs (3) and 10% for SCCs (5) . Poor cosmetic results are common after radiotherapy and cosmesis often deteriorates with time (8) . Radiotherapy is expensive and protracted, usually requiring multiple daily hospital presentations over several weeks. Some wound healing problems can occur (13) , and there is an associated carcinogenic risk after treatment (14) .

Topical chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil has shown recurrence rates of 20–30% for intraepithelial carcinomas (15) , 13.7% 5-year recurrence for BCCs, and 20% for SCCs (16) . 5-fluorouracil is not effective for invasive lesions (17) and requires prolonged follow-up treatment, and more aggressive lesions may develop after treatment (18) . Recently Imiquimod has been reported as an effective topical treatment for superficial BCCs (surface area <15 mm2) showing initial response rates of 70–100%, depending on treatment regimen (19) . However, the treatment required up to two daily topical applications for 6 weeks and was associated with local and some systemic toxicity (19 , 20) .

Euphorbia peplus, commonly known as "petty spurge" in England or "radium weed" in Australia, has a long history of traditional use for a variety of conditions, including topical self-treatment of basal cell carcinomas with E. peplus sap (21) . In a survey of home remedies for skin cancer and solar keratoses, topical administration of the sap was unanimously considered by the users to be effective (21 , 22) . The sap of E. peplus contains several macrocyclic diterpenes, including 3-ingenyl angelate (PEP005; Fig. 1Citation ). Here, we demonstrate the potential of PEP005 as a novel topical chemotherapeutic agent for the treatment of skin cancer. PEP005 causes rapid mitochondrial disruption and cell death by primary necrosis, and ultimately results in a favorable cosmetic outcome.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. Structure of the diterpene ester 3-ingenyl angelate (PEP005).

 

    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cell Cultures and Reagents.
SKMel28 (human melanoma; ATCC HTB-72), B16 (mouse melanoma; ATCC CRL-6322), PC-3 (human prostate carcinoma; ATCC CRL-1435), HeLa S3 (human cervical adenocarcinoma; ATCC CCL-2.2), MCF7 (human breast adenocarcinoma; ATCC HTB-22), Jurkat (human acute T cell leukemia; ATCC TIB-152) and DU145 (human prostate carcinoma; ATCC HTB-81) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection. The human melanoma cell line MM96L has been described previously (23) . The mouse SCC cell line LK2 has been described previously (24) . Cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies, Inc., Rockville, MD) supplemented with 10% FCS (CSL Biosciences, Parkville, Victoria, Australia), 100 µg/ml streptomycin and 100 IU/ml penicillin (Life Technologies, Inc., Rockville, MD; complete medium) at 37°C and 5% CO2. PEP005 was obtained from Peplin Biotech Ltd (Brisbane, Queensland, Australia) at greater than 98.5% purity.

In Vitro Acute Cytotoxicity Assay.
Cells were seeded (10,000/well) into 96-well tissue culture plates (CSL Biosciences) and were grown for 24 h before treatment. PEP005 was dissolved in 100% acetone and was diluted in complete medium; the acetone concentration in the medium did not exceed 1%. Control cells were treated with the equivalent dose of acetone. Treatments were conducted in triplicate, and each experiment in duplicate. Two days after treatment initiation, the cells were washed with PBS and fixed in ethanol, and total protein was determined using sulforhodamine B as described previously (25) . Data were presented as a percentage of control cell protein.

In Vivo Tumor Growth.
Cells (5 x 105, B16; 1 x 106, LK2) were injected (s.c.) into the flanks of female 6–10-week-old Foxn1nu (BALB/c nu/nu) mice (four tumor sites/mouse) or the shaved rear flanks of female 6–10-week-old C57BL/6 mice (two tumor sites/mouse; Animal Resource Centre, Perth, Western Australia, Australia). PEP005 was dissolved in an isopropanol-based gel composed of 25% w/w isopropyl alcohol and 25% w/w propyl alcohol in water (pH 4–6). The gel (10 µl) was applied topically onto established tumors and was spread over the tumor site with a small sterile spatula. Tumor size was measured using calipers. Mice were euthanized by CO2 inhalation when the cumulative tumor burden per mouse exceeded 1000 mm3.

Electron Microscopic Analysis.
C57BL/6 mice were inoculated with B16 cells as described above. C57BL/6 mice were euthanized by CO2 inhalation at the indicated times after a single topical application of PEP005 (42 nmol; 18 µg) in isopropanol vehicle (10 µl) or vehicle alone to the established B16 tumors. The treated tumors were excised, cut into 1 mm3 pieces and fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium-phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). The samples were treated with 1% osmium tetroxide, dehydrated with acetone and embedded in Epon 612 resin. Sections collected on grids were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and examined on a JEOL 1010 transmission electron microscope at 80 kV.

Cultured cells were washed once in PBS and fixed for 30 min in 1% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium-phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), and the samples were processed as above.

JC1 Staining Assay.
SKMel28 cells were seeded at 1 x 106 cells/well in a 6-well plate. The following day, the cells were treated with PEP005 or 200 µM carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (Sigma, St. Louis, MO; Refs. 26 , 27 ). PEP005 and carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone were dissolved in 100% acetone and diluted in complete medium; the acetone concentration in the medium did not exceed 1%. Ten min before the completion of treatment, cells were stained by the addition of 5 µg/ml JC1 (Molecular Probes Inc., Eugene, OR; Ref. 28 ) to the medium. Adherent and nonadherent cells were collected and pelleted (1500 rpm for 7 min, room temperature). The cells were washed twice in PBS supplemented with 0.5% FCS (PBS/0.5% FCS) and resuspended in 1 ml PBS/0.5% FCS before analysis by fluorescence-activated cell sorting using a FacsCalibur instrument and CellQuest 3.3 software (Becton Dickinson, Palo Alto, CA).

Chromium Release Assay.
Tumor cells were trypsinized, washed in medium, pelleted, and 51Cr-labeled for 1 h at 37°C. The cells were washed twice in medium and plated out in six replicates in 96-well flat-bottomed plates (2 x 104/well), and were cultured in complete medium for 4 h at 37°C and 5% CO2. PEP005 (dissolved in 100% acetone and diluted in complete medium; final acetone concentration in the medium, <1%) or 1% acetone (control) was added, and at each time point after treatment initiation, the plates were removed from the incubator, centrifuged at 200 x g for 2 min; 20 µl of the supernatant was then removed and placed into a LumaPlate (Packard Biosci., Groningen, the Netherlands). The LumaPlates were dried and radioactivity measured using a Packard Top Count Microplate scintillation counter. The accumulated amount of 51Cr released at each time point was expressed as a percentage of total 51Cr, which was determined by lysis of parallel cells with 10% SDS.

PI Uptake Assay.
B16 cells were trypsinized, washed in complete medium and diluted to 4 x 106 cells/ml in complete medium at 37°C. Propidium iodide (PI; Sigma) was added to the cells at a concentration of 500 ng/ml. After 5 min, the cells were treated with 230 µM PEP005, which was dissolved in 100% acetone and diluted in complete medium (final acetone concentration in the medium <1%). Control cells were treated with 1% acetone. At the indicated times after treatment, 4 x 105 cells were removed from the two tubes and were diluted in 2 ml of PBS. The cells were analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting using a FacsCalibur instrument and CellQuest 3.3 software (Becton Dickinson, Pal Alto, CA). The percentage of cells that had clearly exceeded the fluorescence intensity threshold that distinguished live versus dead cells was determined.


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Anticancer Activity of PEP005 in Vitro.
The acute cytotoxic activity of PEP005 was determined by the loss of adherent cells from culture after 2 days of treatment. The relationship between the dose of PEP005 and cytotoxicity is shown for two tumor lines (the human melanoma cell line SKMel28 and the mouse melanoma cell line B16) in Fig. 2Citation . The 90% lethal dose (LD90) is shown for these lines and an additional five tumor lines (Table 1)Citation . The dose response curves (Fig. 2)Citation and the LD90 values (Table 1)Citation were broadly similar for all of the tumor lines tested, with the LD90 dose ranging from 180 to 220 µM (Table 1)Citation . Similar results were obtained when more sparsely seeded cultures were treated for 5 days (data not shown). Treatment for 24 h at the LD90 dose followed by removal of PEP005 was sufficient to prevent any outgrowth of remaining cells (data not shown).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. Dose response for acute cell cytotoxicity of 3-ingenyl angelate (PEP005). SKMel28 ({square}) and B16 ({blacksquare}) cells were treated with 0, 0.69, 2.3, 23, 58, 69, 116, 174, or 230 µM PEP005. After 2 days, total protein was determined using sulforhodamine B. Data are presented as percentage of control cell protein (±SE).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 LD90 of PEP005 (3-ingenyl angelate) in vitro

The LD90 of PEP005 for a panel of tumor cell lines was determined from the dose response of acute cytotoxicity (see Fig. 2Citation ).

 
Topical Treatment of Tumors Grown on C57BL/6 and Foxn1nu Mice.
PEP005 dose response (Fig. 3A)Citation and treatment frequency (Fig. 3B)Citation was investigated in vivo using the mouse UV-induced SCC cell line, LK2, grown in Foxn1nu mice. LK2 tumors grown s.c. to 17–20 mm3 (14 days after inoculation) were treated three times daily with 14, 42, or 126 nmol of PEP005. Although the lowest dose produced a significant delay in tumor growth (P < 0.001), doses over 42 nmol were required to effect a 100% cure rate (Fig. 3A)Citation . Comparison of different treatment frequencies (with the total dose remaining constant) showed that three daily applications gave a significantly better cure rate that one or seven daily applications (P < 0.001 and = 0.04), respectively (Fig. 3B)Citation . Untreated tumors grew rapidly, whereas tumors treated daily for three days with 42 nmol of PEP005 were cured. One-day (high dose) or 7-day (low dose) regimens failed to cure several of the 16 treated tumors. The growth of tumors treated with vehicle alone was no different from that of untreated tumors (data not shown).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 3. Antitumor activity of PEP005 in vivo. A, LK2 cells were injected s.c. into four sites on the backs of Foxn1nu mice and were treated, 20 days after inoculation (18 mm3), daily for 3 days with vehicle alone ({blacksquare}) 14 nmol (6 µg; {bullet}), 42 nmol (18 µg; {circ}) or 126 nmol (54 µg; {square}) of PEP005 (n = 16 tumors/group, 4 tumors/mouse). Tumors were monitored for 1 month after treatment. Data are presented as number of tumors present (of 16) as a function of time. B, LK2 tumors were also treated with a total of 116 nmol (50 µg), 126 nmol (54 µg), or 163 nmol (70 µg) of PEP005 in isopropanol gel over 1 ({bullet}), 3 ({circ}), or 7 ({square}) days, respectively. Control tumors were treated with vehicle alone ({blacksquare}; 16 tumors/group, 4 tumors/mouse). Tumors were monitored for 1 month after treatment. Data are presented as number of tumors present (of 16) as a function of time. C, B16 mouse melanoma cells were injected s.c. into two sites on the backs of C57BL/6 mice, and 8 days after inoculation (6.3 mm3), they were treated topically with 42 nmol (18 µg) of PEP005 (daily for 3 days; {blacksquare}; 14 tumors/group, 2 tumors/mouse). Control tumors (which had reached 1.9 mm3, 8 days after inoculation) were treated with vehicle alone ({square}). Tumors were monitored for 94 days after treatment. The indicated tumor volumes represent the average volume of individual tumors (±SE). D, treatment with PEP005 (as detailed in C) results in tumor cure and a favorable cosmetic response. D, panel 1, B16 mouse melanoma tumors at 13 days after inoculation on Foxn1nu mice. D, panel 2, PEP005-treated tumors at 26 days after treatment initiation. The circles indicate the location of the B16 tumors before treatment.

 
The efficacy of three daily applications of 42 nmol of PEP005 was further demonstrated in the B16 tumor model using C57BL/6 mice. Topical treatment of established B16 tumors with PEP005 resulted in 100% regression of tumors, with animals remaining tumor-free for 94 days after the initiation of treatment (14 tumors/group, 2 tumors/mouse; Fig. 3CCitation ). Control tumors that were treated with the isopropanol gel vehicle alone grew rapidly, reaching {approx}200 mm3 within 17 days after treatment onset.

Treatment with PEP005 also cured a panel of tumor lines grown s.c. on Foxn1nu or C57BL/6 mice (Table 2)Citation . The effective treatment dose did not vary significantly for the different tumor lines (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Tumors cured by topical treatment with PEP005 (3-ingenyl angelate)

A panel of s.c. mouse and human tumors established in mice were treated topically as shown in Fig. 3CCitation . Cure is defined as a complete clinical response 3–4 weeks after treatment.

 
Irrespective of the tumor type being treated or the mouse strain used, an acute erythema was apparent after completion of the three daily treatments with 42 nmol of PEP005, which lasted for 2–3 days, with mild erythema visible for 2–3 weeks. Eschar formation occurred within 3–4 days after completion of treatment and resolved within a week. The cosmetic effect after treatment was very favorable and is illustrated for Foxn1nu mice, which had B16 tumors treated 3 weeks previously (Fig. 3DCitation , panel 2). The skin at this time was similar to untreated skin and had normal elasticity. Although slight scarring and erythema remained (Fig. 3DCitation , panel 2), both continued to resolve over 2–3 months (data not shown).

Mitochondrial Swelling and Necrosis after Treatment with PEP005 in Vitro and in Vivo.
To further investigate the nature of PEP005-mediated cytotoxicity, B16 mouse melanoma cells, treated with PEP005 in vivo and in vitro, were analyzed by transmission electron microscopy. The first identifiable morphological change after PEP005 treatment was the pronounced swelling of mitochondria seen within 3.5 h of treatment of cells in vitro (230 µM; Fig. 4ACitation , panel 2), and within 6 h of a single topical application of 42 nmol of PEP005 to a B16 melanoma established s.c. on C57BL/6 mice (Fig. 4BCitation , panel 3). Mitochondria in control cells treated with vehicle alone remain unaffected (Fig. 4ACitation , panel 1, and Fig. 4BCitation , panel 2). By 6 h, the majority of cells treated in vitro exhibited clear signs of primary necrosis, with disintegration of the plasma membranes and disruption of cytoplasmic organelles (Fig. 4ACitation , panel 3). A similar picture emerged 24 h after PEP005 treatment of B16 tumors in vivo (Fig. 4BCitation , panel 4). Control cells treated with vehicle remained unaffected (Fig. 4ACitation , panel 1, and Fig. 4BCitation , panel 1). Electron microscopy analysis of Lewis lung cells treated with PEP005 in vitro showed essentially identical results (data not shown). These electron micrographs illustrate that at cytotoxic doses, PEP005 caused rapid mitochondrial swelling and cell death by primary necrosis.



View larger version (180K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 4. Transmission electron micrograph of B16 melanoma cells, with and without PEP005. A, B16 cells in vitro. Panel 1, control cells; Panel 2, swollen mitochondria in cells treated with 230 µM PEP005 for 3.5 h. Panel 3, PEP005-treated (230 µM) cells (6 h) showing signs of primary necrosis; clumping of chromatin without nuclear membrane distribution and plasma membrane rupture. B, B16 cells in vivo. Panel 1, control tumor cells. Panel 2, mitochondria in control, untreated B16 tumor cells. Panel 3, swollen mitochondria in PEP005-treated B16 tumor cells (6 h after a single topical treatment with 42 nmol). Panel 4, B16 tumor cells, 24 h after a single topical treatment with 42 nmol PEP005, showing clear signs of primary necrosis.

 
That PEP005 cytotoxicity involves primary necrosis was supported by the observation that overexpression of the apoptosis resistance gene Bcl2 in B16 cells did not convey resistance to PEP005 treatment (data not shown). Furthermore, treatment of B16 cells with 230 µM PEP005 failed to show any DNA laddering or PI-independent Annexin V staining, which are often characteristics of apoptosis (data not shown).

Loss of Mitochondrial Membrane Potential after Treatment with PEP005 in Vitro.
Mitochondrial swelling is often associated with the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential ({Delta}{psi}m), a phenomenon readily measured using the mitochondrial dye JC1 and fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis (28) . Under normal circumstances, JC1 accumulates in the inner mitochondrial membrane in which it oligomerizes and fluoresces red. A reduction in {Delta}{psi}m results in diffusion of the dye from the mitochondria and a subsequent reduction in the mean red fluorescent intensity. As expected, control tumor cells showed a high mean red fluorescence (set to 100%) after staining with JC1 (Fig. 5)Citation . After treatment with 200 µM carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone, a known mitochondrial protonophore, the mean red fluorescence of the mitochondria dropped rapidly within 30 min, indicating that the {Delta}{psi}m had collapsed (Fig. 5A)Citation . Tumor cells treated with 230 µM PEP005 also showed a rapid reduction in the mean red fluorescence intensity, which, in repeated experiments, was always slightly slower than that seen for carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (Fig. 5ACitation , and data not shown). Thus, treatment of tumor cells with cytotoxic doses of PEP005 causes a rapid loss of {Delta}{psi}m.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 5. Mitochondrial membrane depolarization after treatment with 3-ingenyl angelate (PEP005). A, tumor cells (SKMel28 melanoma) were treated with 200 µM carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP; {square}) or with 230 µM PEP005 ({blacksquare}) and were stained with JC1, a dye that oligomerizes in normal mitochondria and fluoresces red. Loss of red fluorescence indicates loss of mitochondrial membrane potential ({Delta}{psi}m). The mean red fluorescence of drug-treated cells was measured at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 h after treatment and are presented as a percentage of the mean red fluorescence of controls (±SE). The insets, the fluorescence-activated cell sorting profiles of control cells and cells treated for 2 h with PEP005 (Y axis, red fluorescence; X axis, green fluorescence). B, tumor cells (SKMel28 melanoma) were treated with 0, 2.3, 23, 58, 116, 174, or 230 µM PEP005 and were stained with JC1. The mean red fluorescence of drug-treated cells was measured at 4 h after treatment and are presented as a percentage of the mean red fluorescence of untreated controls (±SE).

 
An analysis of the relationship between {Delta}{psi}m and PEP005 concentration revealed that subcytolytic doses of PEP005 also decreased {Delta}{psi}m, albeit less efficiently than a cytolytic dose of PEP005 (230 µM). This result does not mirror the data presented in Fig. 2Citation , indicating that loss of mitochondrial membrane potential may not be sufficient for PEP005-mediated killing. Furthermore, treatment of cells with reactive oxygen species inhibitors (e.g., DTT) did not prevent PEP005-induced cell death (data not shown).

Plasma Membrane Perturbations after Treatment with PEP005 in Vitro.
To further investigate the mechanism of PEP005-mediated killing, the plasma membrane integrity of PEP005-treated tumor cells was investigated using 51Cr release and PI uptake. Within 10 min of PEP005 (230 µM) addition to B16 or LK2 cells in vitro, ~30% of the total amount of 51Cr loaded into the cells was already released, with nearly 80% released after 1 h (Fig. 6, A and B)Citation . Within 30 min, uptake of PI was seen in 15% of cells and in 80% after 2 h (Fig. 6CCitation ; the scale on the X axis is different in A and B). These studies indicate that PEP005 mediates rapid plasma membrane damage resulting in rapid efflux of 51Cr and in entry of PI [uptake of PI, a high molecular-weight, charged compound, is a test for membrane integrity and indicates primary necrosis when observed in the absence of evidence for apoptosis (29) ].



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 6. Release of 51Cr and uptake of propidium iodide (PI) after 3-ingenyl angelate (PEP005) treatment. A, tumor cells (LK2 SCC) were labeled with 51Cr, washed and treated with 230 µM PEP005 ({square}) or diluents ({blacksquare}). The accumulated 51Cr released into the supernatant at the indicated times is presented as a percentage of total cell 51Cr (±SD). B, as for A, but using B16 melanoma cells. C, B16 cells were treated with 230 µM PEP005 ({square}) or 1% acetone (v:v; {blacksquare}) and then with PI. The percentage of drug or acetone-treated cells (±SD) taking up PI at the indicated time points is shown. The scale on the X axis is different for C and A/B.

 
Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis using anti-Annexin V staining showed that PEP005 (230 µM)-treated cells did not become Annexin V positive unless they became PI positive (data not shown), further illustrating that apoptosis was not a feature of PEP005-mediated killing at this dose.


    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
This report describes the preclinical activity of a new topical anticancer agent, PEP005 that was capable of regressing a wide range of established s.c. tumors in mice after three daily treatments, yet achieving a favorable cosmetic effect. PEP005 also demonstrated a novel mode of action for a chemotherapeutic agent, causing plasma membrane disruption and rapid loss of the mitochondrial membrane potential and subsequent mitochondrial swelling, followed by cell death by primary necrosis within 1 h.

The morphological characteristics of PEP005-mediated killing, the rapid loss of plasma membrane integrity, and the lack of DNA laddering, PI-independent Annexin V staining, and Bcl2 sensitivity provide compelling evidence for induction of primary necrosis by PEP005 rather than apoptosis. Mitochondria are well known as targets for chemotherapeutic agents, because they have a central role in the induction and regulation of apoptotic cell death (30 , 31) . However, it has recently become evident that mitochondria can also play a role in primary necrosis (32 , 33) , although few current chemotherapeutic agents induce this form of cell death. The early mitochondrial swelling seen after PEP005 treatment and the necrotic outcome is reminiscent of ischemia reperfusion injury in which plasma membrane disruption (34) and mitochondrial dysfunction and rapid depletion of ATP are central to the induction of cell death (35) . Cryotherapy also induces primary necrosis and, like PEP005, is associated with an inflammatory reaction at the treatment site (36) . Plasma membrane disruption is likely to cause changes in cytoplasmic ionic concentrations, which can lead to mitochondrial swelling and loss of mitochondrial membrane potential (32, 33, 34) . The immediate plasma membrane effects seen after PEP005 might, therefore, support this sequence of events for the PEP005 mechanism of action. PEP005, thus, emerges as having a mode of action distinct from most anticancer agents, inducing cell death in a manner more akin to that seen after injury, but leading to rapid healing, resolution of the lesion, and swift regeneration of normal skin architecture.

Several ingenol esters are known to activate protein kinase C (PKC; Ref. 37 ), and PEP005 is also a potent activator of PKC enzymes.4 There are a number of anticancer agents currently in development that modulate PKC enzymes (38 , 39) , and certain PKC isoenzymes have been associated with mitochondrial disruption (40, 41, 42) . However, we have thus far been unable to demonstrate that PKC modulation by PEP005 is responsible for its cytotoxic activity, because the PKC inhibitors bisindolyl maleimide and GÖ6976 failed to block the acute cytotoxicity of PEP005 in vitro (data not shown). However, such results may simply reflect an inability of the inhibitors to prevent PEP005-mediated translocation of specific PKC isoenzymes, or mismatched bioavailability profiles for PEP005 and the inhibitors (38 , 39 , 43 , 44) . A deoxy derivative of PEP005 [3-(20-deoxyingenyl) angelate] has similar acute cytotoxicity but activates PKC very poorly and is inactive as a topical chemotherapeutic agent in mice (data not shown). PKC activation may thus contribute to, but may not be sufficient for, achieving the efficacy of PEP005. The inflammatory response seen after topical PEP005 treatment is likely to be a consequence of PKC activation (45) , and one might speculate that PKC activation and stimulation of inflammatory cells contribute to the effective wound healing seen after PEP005 treatment (46 , 47) .

At the high local concentration achievable by local application, PEP005 is an acutely cytotoxic drug that rapidly kills tumor cells and shows little specificity for different tumor cell types. Only three topical applications of PEP005 were required for tumor cure in mouse models, and to date, the only significant finding from formal toxicology studies evaluating topical treatment with PEP005 was local inflammation (data not shown). PEP005, thus, represents a novel topical chemotherapeutic agent, which induces primary necrosis and is, therefore, unlikely to have its activity compromised by the development of apoptosis resistance in tumor cells (48 , 49) . Despite this mode of action, PEP005 treatment is associated with a very favorable cosmetic outcome (Fig. 3D)Citation , a feature that was also noted after the use of E. peplus sap to treat human skin lesions (21) . Overall, PEP005 may be less traumatic to patients and less demanding on clinical resources than current treatments for nonmelanoma skin cancer and may deliver significantly improved outcomes. Clinical-grade PEP005 is currently being manufactured in preparation for human clinical trials.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Clay Winterford for processing material for electron microscopy.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Grant support: Funded by Peplin Biotech Ltd and by an Australian Commonwealth Government Industry Research and Development Board R&D START grant.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Note: S. M. Ogbourne and A. Suhrbier contributed equally to this work.

Requests for reprints: Steven M. Ogbourne, Melanoma Genomics Group, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, 300 Herston Road, Herson, Brisbane, Queensland 4006, Australia.

4 S-J. Cozzi, G. M. Boyle, S. M. Ogbourne, J. Pedley, and P. G. Parsons. The role of PKC in the irreversible growth arrest of human melanoma cells by diterpene esters, manuscript in preparation. Back

Received 9/ 9/03. Revised 12/10/03. Accepted 2/ 5/04.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. American Cancer Society. . Cancer Facts and Figures, 2003. Pamphlet, American Cancer Society 2003.
  2. Housman TS, Feldman SR, Williford PM, et al Skin cancer is among the most costly of all cancers to treat for the Medicare population. J Am Acad Dermatol, 48: 425-9, 2003.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Rowe DE, Carroll RJ, Day CL, Jr Long-term recurrence rates in previously untreated (primary) basal cell carcinoma: implications for patient follow-up. J Dermatol Surg Oncol, 15: 315-28, 1989.[Medline]
  4. Koplin L, Zarem HA. Recurrent basal cell carcinoma. A review concerning the incidence, behavior, and management of recurrent basal cell carcinoma, with emphasis on the incompletely excised lesion. Plast Reconstr Surg, 65: 656-64, 1980.[Medline]
  5. Thissen MR, Neumann MH, Schouten LJ. A systematic review of treatment modalities for primary basal cell carcinomas. Arch Dermatol, 135: 1177-83, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Rowe DE, Carroll RJ, Day CL, Jr. Prognostic factors for local recurrence, metastasis, and survival rates in squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, ear, and lip. Implications for treatment modality selection. J Am Acad Dermatol, 26: 976-90, 1992.[Medline]
  7. Anthony ML. Surgical treatment of nonmelanoma skin cancer. AORN J, 71: 552-8, 560, 2000.[Medline]
  8. Petit JY, Avril MF, Margulis A, et al Evaluation of cosmetic results of a randomized trial comparing surgery and radiotherapy in the treatment of basal cell carcinoma of the face. Plast Reconstr Surg, 105: 2544-51, 2000.[Medline]
  9. Jemec GB, Holm EA. Nonmelanoma skin cancer in organ transplant patients. Transplantation, 75: 253-7, 2003.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Abide JM, Nahai F, Bennett RG. The meaning of surgical margins. Plast Reconstr Surg, 73: 492-7, 1984.[Medline]
  11. Needham R. C. Emmet A O’Rourke M eds. . Malignant skin tumours, p. 170-1, Churchill Livingston New York 1982.
  12. Hacker SM, Browder JF, Ramos-Caro FA. Basal cell carcinoma. Choosing the best method of treatment for a particular lesion. Postgrad. Med, 93: 101-8, 111, 1993.
  13. Mazurkiewicz M, Peszynski J. Acute radiation reaction and its healing time after skin cancer radiotherapy in elderly patients (in Polish). Pol Merkuriusz Lek, 4: 199-201, 1998.[Medline]
  14. Karagas MR, McDonald JA, Greenberg ER, et al Risk of basal cell and squamous cell skin cancers after ionizing radiation therapy. For The Skin Cancer Prevention Study Group. J Natl Cancer Inst (Bethesda), 88: 1848-53, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Clurrie G. Emmet A O’Rourke M eds. . Malignant skin tumours, p. 176-82, Churchill Livingston New York 1982.
  16. Goette DK. Topical chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil. A review. J Am Acad Dermatol, 4: 633-49, 1981.[Medline]
  17. Dabski K, Helm F. Topical chemotherapy Schwartz RA eds. . Skin cancer: recognition and management, p. 378-89, Springer-Verlag New York 1998.
  18. Hill BH. Occurrence of squamous carcinoma in hyperkeratoses and Bowenoid lesions treated with 5-fluorouracil. Australas J Dermatol, 11: 107 1970.[Medline]
  19. Marks R, Gebauer K, Shumack S, et al Imiquimod 5% cream in the treatment of superficial basal cell carcinoma: results of a multicenter 6-week dose-response trial. J Am Acad Dermatol, 44: 807-13, 2001.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Beutner KR, Geisse JK, Helman D, Fox TL, Ginkel A, Owens ML. Therapeutic response of basal cell carcinoma to the immune response modifier imiquimod 5% cream. J Am Acad Dermatol, 41: 1002-7, 1999.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Weedon D, Chick J. Home treatment of basal cell carcinoma. Med J Aust, 1: 928 1976.[Medline]
  22. Green AC, Beardmore GL. Home treatment of skin cancer and solar keratoses. Australas J Dermatol, 29: 127-30, 1988.[Medline]
  23. Maynard K, Parsons PG. Cross-sensitivity of methylating agents, hydroxyurea, and methotrexate in human tumor cells of the Mer-phenotype. Cancer Res, 46: 5009-13, 1986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Cavanagh LL, Halliday GM. Dendritic epidermal T cells in ultraviolet-irradiated skin enhance skin tumor growth by inhibiting CD4+ T-cell-mediated immunity. Cancer Res, 56: 2607-15, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Skehan P, Storeng R, Scudiero D, et al New colorimetric cytotoxicity assay for anticancer-drug screening. J Natl Cancer Inst (Bethesda), 82: 1107-12, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Cunarro J, Weiner MW. Mechanism of action of agents which uncouple oxidative phosphorylation: direct correlation between proton-carrying and respiratory-releasing properties using rat liver mitochondria. Biochim Biophys Acta, 387: 234-40, 1975.[Medline]
  27. Minamikawa T, Williams DA, Bowser DN, Nagley P. Mitochondrial permeability transition and swelling can occur reversibly without inducing cell death in intact human cells. Exp Cell Res, 246: 26-37, 1999.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Smiley ST, Reers M, Mottola-Hartshorn C, et al Intracellular heterogeneity in mitochondrial membrane potentials revealed by a J-aggregate-forming lipophilic cation JC-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 88: 3671-5, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Walsh GM, Dewson G, Wardlaw AJ, Levi-Schaffer F, Moqbel R. A comparative study of different methods for the assessment of apoptosis and necrosis in human eosinophils. J Immunol Methods, 217: 153-63, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Brenner C, Le Bras M, Kroemer G. Insights into the mitochondrial signaling pathway: what lessons for chemotherapy?. J. Clin Immunol, 23: 73-80, 2003.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Debatin KM, Poncet D, Kroemer G. Chemotherapy: targeting the mitochondrial cell death pathway. Oncogene, 21: 8786-803, 2002.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Crompton M. The mitochondrial permeability transition pore and its role in cell death. Biochem J, 341(Pt 2): 233-49, 1999.
  33. Nieminen AL. Apoptosis and necrosis in health and disease: role of mitochondria. Int Rev Cytol, 224: 29-55, 2003.[Medline]
  34. Nishimura Y, Lemasters JJ. Glycine blocks opening of a death channel in cultured hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells during chemical hypoxia. Cell Death Differ, 8: 850-8, 2001.[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Kim JS, He L, Lemasters JJ. Mitochondrial permeability transition: a common pathway to necrosis and apoptosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 304: 463-70, 2003.[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Gazzaniga S, Bravo A, Goldszmid SR, et al Inflammatory changes after cryosurgery-induced necrosis in human melanoma xenografted in nude mice. J Investig Dermatol, 116: 664-71, 2001.[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Fujiwara M, Okamoto M, Ijichi K, et al Upregulation of HIV-1 replication in chronically infected cells by ingenol derivatives. Arch Virol, 143: 2003-10, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Barry OP, Kazanietz MG. Protein kinase C isozymes, novel phorbol ester receptors and cancer chemotherapy. Curr Pharm Des, 7: 1725-44, 2001.[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Hofmann J. Modulation of protein kinase C in antitumor treatment. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol, 142: 1-96, 2001.[Medline]
  40. Kumar S, Bharti A, Mishra NC, et al Targeting of the c-Abl tyrosine kinase to mitochondria in the necrotic cell death response to oxidative stress. J Biol Chem, 276: 17281-5, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Majumder PK, Pandey P, Sun X, et al Mitochondrial translocation of protein kinase C {delta} in phorbol ester-induced cytochrome c release and apoptosis. J Biol Chem, 275: 21793-6, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Ruvolo PP, Deng X, Carr BK, May WS. A functional role for mitochondrial protein kinase C{alpha} in Bcl2 phosphorylation and suppression of apoptosis. J Biol Chem, 273: 25436-42, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Cartee L, Kucera GL. Protein kinase C modulation and anticancer drug response. Cancer Invest, 18: 731-39, 2000.[Medline]
  44. Musashi M, Ota S, Shiroshita N. The role of protein kinase C isoforms in cell proliferation and apoptosis. Int J Hematol, 72: 12-9, 2000.[Medline]
  45. Wang QJ, Bhattacharyya D, Garfield S, Nacro K, Marquez VE, Blumberg PM. Differential localization of protein kinase C{delta} by phorbol esters and related compounds using a fusion protein with green fluorescent protein. J Biol Chem, 274: 37233-9, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Chida K, Hara T, Hirai T, et al Disruption of protein kinase C{eta} results in impairment of wound healing and enhancement of tumor formation in mouse skin carcinogenesis. Cancer Res, 63: 2404-8, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Werner S, Grose R. Regulation of wound healing by growth factors and cytokines. Physiol Rev, 83: 835-70, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Ivanov VN, Bhoumik A, Ronai Z. Death receptors and melanoma resistance to apoptosis. Oncogene, 22: 3152-61, 2003.[CrossRef][Medline]
  49. Johnstone RW, Ruefli AA, Lowe SW. Apoptosis: a link between cancer genetics and chemotherapy. Cell, 108: 153-64, 2002.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. Ghoul, M. Serova, L. Astorgues-Xerri, I. Bieche, G. Bousquet, M. Varna, M. Vidaud, E. Phillips, S. Weill, K. A. Benhadji, et al.
Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition and Resistance to Ingenol 3-Angelate, a Novel Protein Kinase C Modulator, in Colon Cancer Cells
Cancer Res., May 15, 2009; 69(10): 4260 - 4269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
M. Serova, A. Ghoul, K. A. Benhadji, S. Faivre, C. Le Tourneau, E. Cvitkovic, F. Lokiec, J. Lord, S. M. Ogbourne, F. Calvo, et al.
Effects of protein kinase C modulation by PEP005, a novel ingenol angelate, on mitogen-activated protein kinase and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling in cancer cells
Mol. Cancer Ther., April 1, 2008; 7(4): 915 - 922.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. M. Challacombe, A. Suhrbier, P. G. Parsons, B. Jones, P. Hampson, D. Kavanagh, G. E. Rainger, M. Morris, J. M. Lord, T. T. T. Le, et al.
Neutrophils Are a Key Component of the Antitumor Efficacy of Topical Chemotherapy with Ingenol-3-Angelate
J. Immunol., December 1, 2006; 177(11): 8123 - 8132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S.-J. Cozzi, P. G. Parsons, S. M. Ogbourne, J. Pedley, and G. M. Boyle
Induction of Senescence in Diterpene Ester-Treated Melanoma Cells via Protein Kinase C-Dependent Hyperactivation of the Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathway.
Cancer Res., October 15, 2006; 66(20): 10083 - 10091.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
X. D. Zhang, J. J. Wu, S. Gillespie, J. Borrow, and P. Hersey
Human Melanoma Cells Selected for Resistance to Apoptosis by Prolonged Exposure to Tumor Necrosis Factor-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand Are More Vulnerable to Necrotic Cell Death Induced by Cisplatin
Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2006; 12(4): 1355 - 1364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
P. Hampson, H. Chahal, F. Khanim, R. Hayden, A. Mulder, L. K. Assi, C. M. Bunce, and J. M. Lord
PEP005, a selective small-molecule activator of protein kinase C, has potent antileukemic activity mediated via the delta isoform of PKC
Blood, August 15, 2005; 106(4): 1362 - 1368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. C. Braun, S. H. Garfield, and P. M. Blumberg
Analysis by Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer of the Interaction between Ligands and Protein Kinase C{delta} in the Intact Cell
J. Biol. Chem., March 4, 2005; 280(9): 8164 - 8171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
D. C. Braun, Y. Cao, S. Wang, S. H. Garfield, G. Min Hur, and P. M. Blumberg
Role of phorbol ester localization in determining protein kinase C or RasGRP3 translocation: Real-time analysis using fluorescent ligands and proteins
Mol. Cancer Ther., January 1, 2005; 4(1): 141 - 150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ogbourne, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Parsons, P. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ogbourne, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Parsons, P. G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online