Cancer Research AACR Legacy  Telomeres
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Lengauer, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Lengauer, C.
[Cancer Research 64, 2998-3001, May 1, 2004]
© 2004 American Association for Cancer Research


Advances in Brief

Three Classes of Genes Mutated In Colorectal Cancers with Chromosomal Instability

Zhenghe Wang1, Jordan M. Cummins1, Dong Shen1, Daniel P. Cahill1, Prasad V. Jallepalli1, Tian-Li Wang1, D. Williams Parsons1, Giovanni Traverso1, Mark Awad1, Natalie Silliman1, Janine Ptak1, Steve Szabo1, James K. V. Willson2, Sanford D. Markowitz2, Michael L. Goldberg3, Roger Karess4, Kenneth W. Kinzler1, Bert Vogelstein1, Victor E. Velculescu1 and Christoph Lengauer1

1 Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center and Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; 2 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Medicine and Ireland Cancer Center, University Hospitals of Cleveland and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; 3 Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York; and 4 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Centre de Génétique Moléculaire, Gif-sur-Yvette, France


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Although most colorectal cancers are chromosomally unstable, the basis for this instability has not been defined. To determine whether genes shown to cause chromosomal instability in model systems were mutated in colorectal cancers, we identified their human homologues and determined their sequence in a panel of colorectal cancers. We found 19 somatic mutations in five genes representing three distinct instability pathways. Seven mutations were found in MRE11, whose product is involved in double-strand break repair. Four mutations were found among hZw10, hZwilch/FLJ10036, and hRod/KNTC, whose products bind to one another in a complex that localizes to kinetochores and controls chromosome segregation. Eight mutations were found in Ding, a previously uncharacterized gene with sequence similarity to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pds1, whose product is essential for proper chromosome disjunction. This analysis buttresses the evidence that chromosomal instability has a genetic basis and provides clues to the mechanistic basis of instability in cancers.


    Introduction
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
A very large fraction of cancers consists of cells with an abnormal chromosomal content, called aneuploidy (1) . Aneuploidy is often associated with chromosomal instability (CIN), a condition in which cancer cells gain and lose whole chromosomes or large parts thereof at elevated rates compared with normal cells (2) . The molecular basis of CIN has remained mysterious. Many mechanisms have been postulated to be responsible for CIN (3 , 4) . Like other phenotypes characteristic of cancer, it is possible that mutations in genes that control chromosome stability are responsible for CIN. However, only a small number of human cancers with mutations in genes known to cause experimental forms of CIN have been identified. These genes include hBUB1, ATM, ATR, BRCA1, and BRCA2, each of which is very infrequently mutated in nonfamilial cancers (5, 6, 7, 8) . Increased copy numbers of aurora2/STK15 and PLK1 have been reported to occur in a higher fraction of cancers (9, 10, 11, 12) , but no definitive mutations of these genes have been identified, and their contribution to CIN remains conjectural.5

In contrast, a large number of genes have been identified that trigger CIN when mutated in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (13 , 14) . These genes are involved in a variety of cellular pathways including chromosome condensation, sister-chromatid cohesion, kinetochore structure and function, microtubule formation, and cell cycle control. Similarly, several genes can cause CIN in Drosophila melanogaster when genetically altered (15 , 16) . Based on these observations, we wondered whether the previous failures to detect mutations in potential CIN genes in human cancers were simply due to the fact that there are a large number of such genes, only a small number of which have been analyzed.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Gene Identification.
Yeast genes that can cause an instability phenotype were identified in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome.6 The corresponding protein sequences were used to search for human homologues in the Celera draft human genome sequence. In addition, several genes were selected by close homology to identified human genes and Celera hCTs or by membership to the same Panther protein family. All exons and adjacent intronic sequence of these genes were extracted from the Celera draft human genome sequence.

PCR and Sequencing.
Primers for PCR amplification and sequencing were designed using the Primer 3 program7 and were synthesized by MWG (High Point, NC) or IDT (Coralville, IA). PCR amplification and sequencing were performed on tumor DNA from 24 early-passage cell lines as described previously (17) using a 384 capillary automated sequencing apparatus (Spectrumedix, State College, PA). Of the 1351 exons extracted, 1282 were successfully analyzed in an average of 23 tumor samples. Sequences of all primers used for PCR amplification and sequencing are available in Supplementary Table 1Citation . For the five genes identified in the initial screen, coding exons were analyzed in tumor DNA from an additional 168 early-passage aneuploid colorectal cancer cell lines passaged in vitro or as xenografts in nude mice


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Chromosomal instability (CIN) candidate genes analyzed

 
Analysis of Mutations.
Sequence traces were assembled and analyzed to identify potential genomic alterations using the Mutation Explorer software package (SoftGenetics, State College, PA).


    Results and Discussion
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
We compiled a list of more than 1000 genes by computational identification of human homologues of "instability" genes of yeast and D. melanogaster. From this list, 100 candidate genes were selected based on the strength of the phenotypes observed in yeast or D. melanogaster and the extent of similarity to the human homologue (Table 1Citation ). The complete sequence of these genes was then determined in a panel of colorectal cancers.

Public and private genomic databases were used to extract the 1351 exons that encode the 100 candidate genes, and 5022 primers were designed for PCR amplification and sequencing (Supplementary Table 1Citation ). Using these primers, each exon was then individually amplified and sequenced from DNA of 24 colorectal cancers. This analysis revealed the presence of 373 variations not present in current human genomic databases. To find out whether these variations were somatic (i.e., tumor specific), we determined whether any of them were present in DNA from matching normal tissues of the patients in whom the mutations were originally detected. We thereby discovered somatic mutations in five genes. All five genes were then analyzed for mutations in a larger panel of tumors including 168 additional colorectal cancers. Altogether, more than 10 Mb of DNA was sequenced, allowing us to identify 19 somatic mutations distributed among three classes of genes (Table 2Citation ; Fig. 1Citation ).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Somatic mutations in chromosomal instability (CIN) cancers

Nonsynonymous and splice site mutations observed in a panel of 192 colorectal cancers.

 


View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. Somatic mutations in genes representing three distinct instability pathways. Position within gene and amino acid change resulting from the mutation are indicated below name of the gene (left column). Sequencing histograms and nucleotide sequences of normal and corresponding tumor DNA are shown in the middle and right columns, respectively. Affected triplets are boxed.

 
MRE11.
Eight somatic mutations in seven different CIN cancers were found in the MRE11 gene (Table 2)Citation . Four mutations generated premature translational stop signals within exons 7, 8, or 13 (Fig. 1)Citation , whereas the others were missense mutations; all but one of these were heterozygous. MRE11 is known to be involved in DNA double-strand break repair and participates in exonuclease and endonuclease activities (18) . Hypomorphic mutations in MRE11 have been described in two families with ataxiatelangiectasia-like disorder (19) . The cellular features resulting from these mutations are similar to those seen in ataxiatelangiectasia as well as in patients with the Nijmegen breakage syndrome and include hypersensitivity to ionizing radiation, radioresistant DNA synthesis, and abrogation of ATM-dependent events. The mutations listed in Table 1Citation represent the first report of MRE11 mutations in human cancers. MRE11 is known to form complexes with the hRad50 and NBS1 proteins, whose role in genomic stability is well documented. Recently published homozygous knockouts of MRE11 in vertebrate cells showed that this gene is essential for cell proliferation and the maintenance of a normal chromosomal content (20 , 21) .

hZw10, hZwilch, and hRod.
We found four somatic mutations in the hZw10, hZwilch/FLJ10036, and hRod/KNTC1 genes (Table 2)Citation . The mutation in hRod was a homozygous missense change (Fig. 1)Citation , whereas the heterozygous mutation in Zwilch affected a splice acceptor site predicted to result in a premature truncation of the Zwilch RNA in its fifth exon. The other two mutations were heterozygous missense changes in hZw10 (Fig. 1)Citation . These three genes act in the same pathway and cause a severe CIN phenotype when mutated in D. melanogaster. Both Zw10 and Rod (rough deal) mutations disrupt the accuracy of chromosome segregation in D. melanogaster and promote aberrant anaphases that lead to aneuploidy (22, 23, 24) . Rod, Zwilch, and Zw10 proteins each localize to the kinetochore in an identical manner and function in the spindle checkpoint (25 , 26) . Recent experiments show that the human homologues of these three genes (hRod, hZwilch, and hZw10) are physically associated and function together in a large, evolutionarily conserved complex (26 , 27) . Interestingly, hRod and hZw10 do not have obvious homologues in budding yeast.

Ding.
The Ding gene was found to be somatically mutated in eight CIN cancers. These tumors did not overlap with those containing mutations in MRE11, hRod, hZw10, or hZwilch. One mutation affected the splice donor site two bases downstream of the last codon in exon 7. Another mutation resulted in a stop codon within exon 14 and the other six mutations were missense changes (Fig. 1Citation ; Table 1Citation ). Ding is a previously uncharacterized gene (KIAA0853) that was selected for sequence analysis because its COOH terminus is homologous (20% identity, 46% similarity) with the yeast protein Pds1. Pds1 is an anaphase inhibitor in budding yeast and plays a critical role in the control of anaphase (28 , 29) . Its human ortholog, hSecurin is essential for the proper function and processing of the separin protease, for separin-dependent cleavage of the cohesion subunit Scc1, and for maintaining chromosome stability (30) .

These data provide novel evidence to support the hypothesis that CIN has a genetic basis. However, analysis of mutations in tumors is complicated by the fact that mutations can arise either as functional alterations driving neoplasia or as nonfunctional "passenger" changes. Two independent lines of evidence suggested that the alterations we observed were functional rather than accidental. First, the distribution of mutations was strikingly nonrandom: seven mutations in MRE11; four in the hRod/hZw10/hZwilch cluster; eight in Ding; and none in 95 other genes. The prevalence of mutations in the coding regions of the five mutated genes was significantly higher than the prevalence of nonfunctional alterations found in the colorectal cancer genome (17) .

It has been unclear whether mutations in one or a few "master" CIN genes is responsible for most CIN cancers or whether CIN is a more "democratic" process, with mutations occurring in dozens or hundreds of different genes, each accounting for only a small portion of CIN cancers. Our sequencing analysis identified somatic mutations in cancer CIN genes that together account for ~10% of CIN cancers and supports the democratic model. Our data also substantiate previous ideas about the mechanisms that may contribute to CIN in human cancers (3) . In particular, they suggest that defects in proteins that are involved in double-strand break repair, kinetochore function, and chromatid segregation are likely to contribute to aneuploidy. Future studies to identify mutations in other genes that function in these three functional pathways, in both colorectal and other human cancers, should be informative.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Grant support: The Virginia and D.K. Ludwig Fund for Cancer Research, The Benjamin Baker Scholarship Fund, The Clayton Fund, and NIH Grants CA 43460, CA 57345, and CA 62924.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Note: Z. Wang, J. Cummins, and D. Shen contributed equally to this work. D. Cahill is currently at Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Surgery, Boston, MA; P. Jallepalli is currently at Molecular Biology Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; G. Traverso is currently at Trinity College, Cambridge, United Kingdom; and M. Awad is currently at Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. Supplementary data for this article can be found at Cancer Research Online (http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org).

Requests for reprints: Christoph Lengauer, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, CRB, Room 585, 1650 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD 21231. Phone: (410) 955-8878; Fax: (410) 955-0548; E-mail: lengauer{at}jhmi.edu

5 While this paper was under review, it was shown that hCDC4 is frequently mutated in aneuploid colorectal cancers, and that its inactivation causes CIN. (Rajagopalan et al. Nature 2004;428:77–81.) Back

6 http://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMGifs/Genomes/yc.html. Back

7 http://www-genome.wi.mit.edu/cgibin/primer/primer3_www.cgi. Back

Received 2/18/04. Accepted 2/27/04.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Boveri T . Zur Frage der Enstehung maligner Tumoren, 1: Gustav Fischer Verlag Jena, Germany 1914.
  2. Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B Genetic instability in colorectal cancers. Nature, 386: 623-7, 1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B Genetic instabilities in human cancers. Nature, 396: 643-9, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Duesberg P, Rasnick D, Li R, Winters L, Rausch C, Hehlmann R How aneuploidy may cause cancer and genetic instability. Anticancer Res, 19: 4887-906, 1999.[Medline]
  5. Cahill DP, Lengauer C, Yu J, et al Mutations of mitotic checkpoint genes in human cancers. Nature, 392: 300-3, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Rotman G, Shiloh Y ATM: from gene to function. Hum Mol Genet, 7: 1555-63, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Smith L, Liu SJ, Goodrich L, et al Duplication of ATR inhibits MyoD, induces aneuploidy and eliminates radiation-induced G1 arrest. Nat Genet, 19: 39-46, 1998.[Medline]
  8. Zhang H, Tombline G, Weber BL BRCA1, BRCA2, and DNA damage response: collision or collusion?. Cell, 92: 433-6, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Zhou H, Kuang J, Zhong L, et al Tumour amplified kinase STK15/BTAK induces centrosome amplification, aneuploidy and transformation. Nat Genet, 20: 189-93, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Bischoff JR, Anderson L, Zhu Y, et al A homologue of Drosophila aurora kinase is oncogenic and amplified in human colorectal cancers. EMBO J, 17: 3052-65, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Wolf G, Elez R, Doermer A, et al Prognostic significance of polo-like kinase (PLK) expression in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncogene, 14: 543-9, 1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Ewart-Toland A, Briassouli P, de Koning JP, et al Identification of Stk6/STK15 as a candidate low-penetrance tumor-susceptibility gene in mouse and human. Nat Genet, 34: 403-12, 2003.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Kolodner RD, Putnam CD, Myung K Maintenance of genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science, 297: 552-7, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Spencer F, Gerring SL, Connelly C, Hieter P Mitotic chromosome transmission fidelity mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics, 124: 237-49, 1990.[Abstract]
  15. Mihaylov IS, Kondo T, Jones L, et al Control of DNA replication and chromosome ploidy by geminin and cyclin A. Mol Cell Biol, 22: 1868-80, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Fung SM, Ramsay G, Katzen AL Mutations in Drosophila myb lead to centrosome amplification and genomic instability. Development, 129: 347-59, 2002.
  17. Wang TL, Rago C, Silliman N, et al Prevalence of somatic alterations in the colorectal cancer cell genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 99: 3076-80, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Paull TT, Gellert M The 3' to 5' exonuclease activity of Mre 11 facilitates repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Mol Cell, 1: 969-79, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Stewart GS, Maser RS, Stankovic T, et al The DNA double-strand break repair gene hMRE11 is mutated in individuals with an ataxiatelangiectasia-like disorder. Cell, 99: 577-87, 1999.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Yamaguchi-Iwai Y, Sonoda E, Sasaki MS, et al Mre11 is essential for the maintenance of chromosomal DNA in vertebrate cells. EMBO J, 18: 6619-29, 1999.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Theunissen JW, Kaplan MI, Hunt PA, et al Checkpoint failure and chromosomal instability without lymphomagenesis in Mre11(ATLD1/ATLD1) mice. Mol Cell, 12: 1511-23, 2003.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Karess RE, Glover DM rough deal: a gene required for proper mitotic segregation in Drosophila. J Cell Biol, 109: 2951-61, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Scaerou F, Aguilera I, Saunders R, et al The rough deal protein is a new kinetochore component required for accurate chromosome segregation in Drosophila. J Cell Sci, 112: 3757-68, 1999.[Abstract]
  24. Starr DA, Williams BC, Li Z, Etemad-Moghadam B, Dawe RK, Goldberg ML Conservation of the centromere/kinetochore protein ZW10. J Cell Biol, 138: 1289-301, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Basto R, Gomes R, Karess RE Rough deal and Zw10 are required for the metaphase checkpoint in Drosophila. Nat Cell Biol, 2: 939-43, 2000.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Chan GK, Jablonski SA, Starr DA, Goldberg ML, Yen TJ Human Zw10 and ROD are mitotic checkpoint proteins that bind to kinetochores. Nat Cell Biol, 2: 944-7, 2000.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Scaerou F, Starr DA, Piano F, Papoulas O, Karess RE, Goldberg ML The ZW10 and Rough Deal checkpoint proteins function together in a large, evolutionarily conserved complex targeted to the kinetochore. J Cell Sci, 114: 3103-14, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Nasmyth K, Peters JM, Uhlmann F Splitting the chromosome: cutting the ties that bind sister chromatids. Science, 288: 1379-85, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Yanagida M Cell cycle mechanisms of sister chromatid separation: roles of Cut1/separin and Cut2/securin. Genes Cells, 5: 1-8, 2000.[Abstract]
  30. Jallepalli PV, Waizenegger IC, Bunz F, et al Securin is required for chromosomal stability in human cells. Cell, 105: 445-57, 2001.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Q. Zhao, O. L. Caballero, S. Levy, B. J. Stevenson, C. Iseli, S. J. de Souza, P. A. Galante, D. Busam, M. A. Leversha, K. Chadalavada, et al.
Transcriptome-guided characterization of genomic rearrangements in a breast cancer cell line
PNAS, February 10, 2009; 106(6): 1886 - 1891.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. J. Leary, J. C. Lin, J. Cummins, S. Boca, L. D. Wood, D. W. Parsons, S. Jones, T. Sjoblom, B.-H. Park, R. Parsons, et al.
Integrated analysis of homozygous deletions, focal amplifications, and sequence alterations in breast and colorectal cancers
PNAS, October 21, 2008; 105(42): 16224 - 16229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
N. M. Rusan and M. Peifer
Original CIN: reviewing roles for APC in chromosome instability
J. Cell Biol., October 20, 2008; 181(5): 719 - 726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
V. E. Velculescu
Defining the blueprint of the cancer genome
Carcinogenesis, June 1, 2008; 29(6): 1087 - 1091.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
W. Bodmer and L. A. Loeb
Genetic Instability Is Not a Requirement for Tumor Development
Cancer Res., May 15, 2008; 68(10): 3558 - 3561.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. D. Barber, K. McManus, K. W. Y. Yuen, M. Reis, G. Parmigiani, D. Shen, I. Barrett, Y. Nouhi, F. Spencer, S. Markowitz, et al.
Chromatid cohesion defects may underlie chromosome instability in human colorectal cancers
PNAS, March 4, 2008; 105(9): 3443 - 3448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
K. W. Yuen and A. Desai
The wages of CIN
J. Cell Biol., February 25, 2008; 180(4): 661 - 663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
J. K. Famulski, L. Vos, X. Sun, and G. Chan
Stable hZW10 kinetochore residency, mediated by hZwint-1 interaction, is essential for the mitotic checkpoint
J. Cell Biol., February 6, 2008; 180(3): 507 - 520.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GENES CELLSHome page
V. Guacci
Sister chromatid cohesion: the cohesin cleavage model does not ring true
Genes Cells, June 1, 2007; 12(6): 693 - 708.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
I. Perez de Castro, G. de Carcer, and M. Malumbres
A census of mitotic cancer genes: new insights into tumor cell biology and cancer therapy
Carcinogenesis, May 1, 2007; 28(5): 899 - 912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
M. A. A. Castro, J. C. M. Mombach, R. M. C. de Almeida, and J. C. F. Moreira
Impaired expression of NER gene network in sporadic solid tumors
Nucleic Acids Res., March 19, 2007; 35(6): 1859 - 1867.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K. W. Y. Yuen, C. D. Warren, O. Chen, T. Kwok, P. Hieter, and F. A. Spencer
Systematic genome instability screens in yeast and their potential relevance to cancer
PNAS, March 6, 2007; 104(10): 3925 - 3930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
T. Sjoblom, S. Jones, L. D. Wood, D. W. Parsons, J. Lin, T. D. Barber, D. Mandelker, R. J. Leary, J. Ptak, N. Silliman, et al.
The Consensus Coding Sequences of Human Breast and Colorectal Cancers
Science, October 13, 2006; 314(5797): 268 - 274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
W. S. El-Deiry, C. C. Sigman, and G. J. Kelloff
Imaging and Oncologic Drug Development
J. Clin. Oncol., July 10, 2006; 24(20): 3261 - 3273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
P. Holmfeldt, K. Brannstrom, S. Stenmark, and M. Gullberg
Aneugenic Activity of Op18/Stathmin Is Potentiated by the Somatic Q18->E Mutation in Leukemic Cells
Mol. Biol. Cell, July 1, 2006; 17(7): 2921 - 2930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. Gaasenbeek, K. Howarth, A. J. Rowan, P. A. Gorman, A. Jones, T. Chaplin, Y. Liu, D. Bicknell, E. J. Davison, H. Fiegler, et al.
Combined array-comparative genomic hybridization and single-nucleotide polymorphism-loss of heterozygosity analysis reveals complex changes and multiple forms of chromosomal instability in colorectal cancers.
Cancer Res., April 1, 2006; 66(7): 3471 - 3479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. Cardoso, L. Molenaar, R. X. de Menezes, M. van Leerdam, C. Rosenberg, G. Moslein, J. Sampson, H. Morreau, J. M. Boer, and R. Fodde
Chromosomal Instability in MYH- and APC-Mutant Adenomatous Polyps.
Cancer Res., March 1, 2006; 66(5): 2514 - 2519.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C. P. Giacomini, S. Y. Leung, X. Chen, S. T. Yuen, Y. H. Kim, E. Bair, and J. R. Pollack
A Gene Expression Signature of Genetic Instability in Colon Cancer
Cancer Res., October 15, 2005; 65(20): 9200 - 9205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
B. Montpetit, K. Thorne, I. Barrett, K. Andrews, R. Jadusingh, P. Hieter, and V. Measday
Genome-Wide Synthetic Lethal Screens Identify an Interaction Between the Nuclear Envelope Protein, Apq12p, and the Kinetochore in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Genetics, October 1, 2005; 171(2): 489 - 501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
A. Ewart-Toland, Q. Dai, Y.-T. Gao, H. Nagase, M. G. Dunlop, S. M. Farrington, R. A. Barnetson, H. Anton-Culver, D. Peel, A. Ziogas, et al.
Aurora-A/STK15 T+91A is a general low penetrance cancer susceptibility gene: a meta-analysis of multiple cancer types
Carcinogenesis, August 1, 2005; 26(8): 1368 - 1373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
G. J.P.L. Kops, Y. Kim, B. A.A. Weaver, Y. Mao, I. McLeod, J. R. Yates III, M. Tagaya, and D. W. Cleveland
ZW10 links mitotic checkpoint signaling to the structural kinetochore
J. Cell Biol., April 11, 2005; 169(1): 49 - 60.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
F. Michor
Chromosomal instability and human cancer
Phil Trans R Soc B, March 29, 2005; 360(1455): 631 - 635.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JDRHome page
S.C. Reshmi and S.M. Gollin
Chromosomal Instability in Oral Cancer Cells
Journal of Dental Research, February 1, 2005; 84(2): 107 - 117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Lengauer, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Lengauer, C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online