Cancer Research AACR Membership  Frontiers in Basic Cancer Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neben, K.
Right arrow Articles by Lichter, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Neben, K.
Right arrow Articles by Lichter, P.
[Cancer Research 64, 3103-3111, May 1, 2004]
© 2004 American Association for Cancer Research


Regular Articles

Microarray-Based Screening for Molecular Markers in Medulloblastoma Revealed STK15 as Independent Predictor for Survival

Kai Neben1, Andrey Korshunov1,3, Axel Benner2, Gunnar Wrobel1, Meinhard Hahn1, Felix Kokocinski1, Andrey Golanov4, Stefan Joos1 and Peter Lichter1

1 Division of Molecular Genetics (B060) and 2 Central Unit Biostatistics (C060), Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany, and Departments of 3 Neuropathology, 4 Neurooncological Surgery, NN Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute, Moscow, Russia


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Medulloblastoma, a primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the cerebellum, is one of the most common central nervous system malignancies of childhood. Despite aggressive multimodal therapy, including surgery, irradiation, and chemotherapy, 5-year survival rates have only approached 50–60%. To identify potential candidate genes that predict for overall survival (OS), we performed a gene expression profiling analysis in 35 newly diagnosed medulloblastoma neoplasms. Subsequently, the nine most promising candidate genes were analyzed by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization on tumor tissue microarrays representing a series of 180 tumors. We found 54 genes in which expression levels predicted for unfavorable survival in medulloblastoma. In line with the gene expression profiling analysis, a positive staining for STK15 (P = 0.0006), stathmin 1 (P = 0.001), and cyclin D1 (P = 0.03) was associated with an unfavorable OS, whereas cyclin B1, DAXX, Ki-67, MYC, NRAS, and p53 showed no statistical significant effect. In comparison to clinically defined parameters such as gender, age, metastatic stage, extent of tumor resection, application of chemotherapy, and tumor grade, positive staining for STK15 was identified as an independent prognostic factor for OS (P = 0.026). Moreover, additional gene copy numbers of MYC (P = 0.003) and STK15 (P = 0.05) predicted for poor survival. The combination of gene expression profiling with tissue microarray experiments allowed the identification of a series of candidate genes that predicts for survival in medulloblastoma. Of the results highlighted by the various data analysis procedures, genes associated with cell proliferation (cyclin D1), transcription (MYC), and especially mitosis (stathmin 1, STK15) appear particularly intriguing with respect to medulloblastoma pathomechanism.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Medulloblastoma is a highly malignant primitive neuroectodermal tumor of the cerebellum. It accounts together with supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumors for 20–25% of all pediatric brain tumors with a peak incidence of 7 years of age (1) . Approximately 65% of medulloblastoma patients are male. Despite aggressive multimodal therapy, including surgery, irradiation, and chemotherapy, disease dissemination is common and 5-year survival rates have only approached 50–60% (2) . Age < 3 years, metastases at presentation and partial surgical resection are clinical features that are generally associated with an adverse prognosis (2 , 3) . To optimize treatment strategies for medulloblastoma patients, a more precise understanding of the cellular and molecular basis of this disease is clearly necessary.

Most pediatric medulloblastomas have abnormal karyotypes, including aneuploidy, unbalanced translocations, and numerous structural rearrangements in the form of double-minute, ring, and marker chromosomes (4 , 5) . In 30–50% of patients, deletion or rearrangement of part of chromosome 17 have been described previously (6, 7, 8) . In most cases, 17p is lost, and head-to-head apposition of both 17q arms occurs, which had been previously considered as isochromosome 17q (9) . Medulloblastomas with loss of 17p have breakpoints either proximally to the TP53 locus at 17p11.2 or distal to TP53 at 17p13.3. In ~10% of medulloblastomas, gene amplifications were identified: the common amplified regions include the oncogenes MYC (8q24) and MYCN (2p24.1; Ref. 8 , 10 ). Although the clinical significance of the majority of these abnormalities remains unclear, recent studies show that amplifications as well as high transcriptional levels of MYC are associated with an unfavorable survival outcome (10 , 11) .

Recently, new insight in the prediction of medulloblastoma outcome was obtained by gene expression profiling experiments. The expression of genes characteristic for cerebellar differentiation or coding for extracellular matrix proteins was correlated with favorable prognosis, whereas the expression of genes related to cell cycle control, multidrug resistance, and ribosomal biogenesis was associated with poor prognosis (12) . Moreover, metastatic disease was associated with expression profiles, including platelet-derived growth factor receptor and genes that are involved in the RAS/MAPK signaling pathway (13) .

In the present study, we performed an expression profiling analysis of 35 medulloblastoma samples to identify potential candidate genes that predict for overall survival (OS) of the patients. Additionally, we applied the approach of tumor tissue microarray (TMA) experiments (14) , a modern high-throughput technology that allowed screening of 180 clinically well-defined medulloblastoma tumor specimens on a large scale. Nine promising candidate genes were analyzed for changes on the protein expression level by immunohistochemistry (IHC). In addition, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed for the detection of additional gene copies of four of them.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Patient Characteristics.
All tumor specimens used in this study were collected at the Department of Neuropathology, NN Burdenko Neurosurgical Institute (Moscow, Russia) between January 1990 and March 2002. All diagnoses were confirmed by histological assessment of a tumor specimen obtained at surgery by at least two neuropathologists according to the WHO 2000 criteria. Because desmoplastic medulloblastomas are rare and its diagnosis is highly subjective, we included only nondesmoplastic medulloblastomas in our study. All medulloblastoma samples were additionally graded as classic and anaplastic according to the recent scheme presented by Eberhart and Burger (15) . Medulloblastoma samples were designated as anaplastic when patterns of moderate or severe anaplasia were present.

Clinical information on the patients included date of birth, date of operation, extent of resection determined by postoperative neuroradiological reports (gross total resection, no visible tumor; near-total resection, >90% of tumor removed; subtotal resection, 51–90% of tumor removed), irradiation or chemotherapy, follow-up time, and outcome. Metastatic stage was studied by craniospinal neuroimaging and liquor cytopathology. Approval to link laboratory data to clinical data was obtained by the Institutional Review Board.

Table 1Citation shows the characteristics of patients with medulloblastoma included in the cDNA microarray (n = 35) and TMA experiments (n = 180). There was an overlap of 30 samples, which were included in both studies. All patients in both series received craniospinal irradiation after surgery. The postoperative irradiation included 36 Gy to the craniospinal axis and a boost of 53–56 Gy to the posterior fossa. Although all patients enrolled in the cDNA microarray study were additionally treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, this was only applied to 112 patients (62.2%) included in the TMA study. Chemotherapy was routinely administered to all patients who were treated after 1995. The chemotherapy regimen comprises lomustine, cisplatin, and vincristine as published previously (2 , 16) .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Characteristics of medulloblastoma patients that were included in the cDNA microarray (n = 35) and tissue microarray studies (n = 180)

 
On March 1, 2003, the 180 medulloblastoma patients included in the TMA study had a median follow-up time of 34 months (range, 3–130 months). There were 109 survivors (median OS, 67 months; range, 14–130 months) and 71 deaths (median OS, 34 months; range, 3–112 months). Sixty-two deceased patients exhibited disease dissemination along the neuroaxis, whereas the remaining 9 patients displayed isolated local tumor progression. The 35 medulloblastoma patients included in the cDNA microarray study had a median follow-up time of 24 months (range, 3–39 months).

cDNA Microarray Experiments.
Samples from each primary tumor were taken at the time of initial operation, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and then continuously stored at –80°C until usage for cDNA microarray experiments. To confirm the presence of viable cellular tumor (>=90% neoplastic cells), cryosections of each medulloblastoma sample (~5-µm thick) were stained with H&E before RNA extraction. Total RNA was isolated according to a protocol that applies both Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany) and RNeasy Midi spin columns (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), followed by Oligotex resin (Qiagen) purification of poly-A RNA (17, 18, 19) . The integrity and purity of the total RNA was analyzed on a 1% agarose gel. Total RNA quality and concentration were determined by absorption spectroscopy between 220 and 320 nm (1 A260 = 40 µg/ml single-stranded RNA).

For gene expression experiments, cDNA microarrays containing replicate spots of 4211 different gene specific fragments representing 2600 different genes with relevance to mitosis, cell cycle control, oncogenesis, or apoptosis were processed as described previously (17, 18, 19) . The tumor RNA was cohybridized with commercially available universal human reference RNA (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA), derived from 10 human cancer cell lines. Approximately 1 µg of medulloblastoma and 1 µg of reference mRNA were labeled with Cy3 and Cy5, respectively, using the Omniscript Reverse Transcriptase kit (Qiagen) and hybridized with 10 µg of C0t1 DNA, 30 µg of bovine liver tRNA, and 10 µg of oligo-dT nucleotides in an automated hybridization chamber (GeneTac; Genomic Solutions, Ann Arbor, MI). For all samples, we performed color switch experiments, where the tumor and reference DNA were labeled via Cy3- and Cy5-dUTP, respectively, and vice versa. Data sets for spots not recognized by the GenePix Pro 4.0 analysis software (Axon Instruments, Union City, CA) were excluded from additional considerations. Additionally, all remaining data sets were ranked according to spot homogeneity (as assayed by the ratio of median and mean fluorescence intensities), spot intensity, and the SD of log ratios for replicate spots. Those data points, ranked among the lower 20%, based on the criteria just described, were removed from the data set. For each hybridization, fluorescence ratios (Cy5/Cy3) were normalized by variance stabilization (20) . To combine experiments with switched dye labeling, the ratios of one experiment were inverted and averaged with the corresponding spots on the second array. The raw data of the microarray experiments are available online.5

Generation of TMAs.
As previously described (21) , H&E-stained sections were made from each paraffin block to define representative tumor regions. From these regions, two tissue cylinders with a diameter of 0.6 mm were obtained and arrayed into a recipient block using the tissue chip microarrayer (Beecher Instruments, Silver Spring, MD). The recipient block was subsequently cut into sections of 5-µm on Histobond-silanized glass slides (Marienfeld, Lauda-Koenigshofen, Germany), which were treated with 3-aminopropylmethoxysilane (Fluka, Seelze, Germany) before cutting to support adhesion of the tissue samples.

IHC.
Paraffin sections were deparaffinized and rehydrated with graded ethanol. Antigen retrieval was performed by heating for 10 min in a microwave either in 10 mM sodium citrate or Tris-EDTA buffer. Endogenous peroxidase was inactivated by incubating the TMAs in 3% hydrogen peroxide. After blocking with normal serum, the sections were incubated with the primary antibodies at 4°C overnight. Antibodies against the following antigens were used: cMYC, clone 9-E11 (1:40): Novocastra (Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom); cyclin B1, clone GNS1 (1:100), DAXX, clone H-7 (1:100), NRAS, clone F-155 (1:150), stathmin 1, clone FL149 (1:250), STK15, clone N20 (1:250): Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA); cyclin D1, clone DSC6 (1:40), Ki-67, clone MIB-1 (1:100): DAKO (Glostrup, Denmark); and p53, clone BP53-11 (1:1000): Progene (Darra Queensland, Australia). For detection, TMAs were incubated for 30 min with biotinylated secondary antibody, and for 30 min with ABC Reagent (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). The slides were stained with 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (Linaris, Wertheim-Bettingen, Germany), counterstained with hematoxylin, and mounted. For negative controls, primary antibodies were substituted with commercially produced control reagents according to the manufacturers’ instructions.

An assessment of IHC was performed for each tissue core in a semiquantitative manner as a percentage of stained cells or nuclei/specimen independently by two different experimenters who were blinded to clinical data. Diffuse cytoplasmic and/or membranous immunostaining of DAXX, NRAS, stathmin 1, and STK15 as well as nuclear expression patterns of cyclin B1, cyclin D1, cMYC, p53, and Ki-67 of >10% of cells was considered as overexpression. Therefore, the analysis of our IHC experiments was only performed by a positive versus negative evaluation of stained cores, which guaranteed a high reproducibility of our results.

FISH.
Two-color FISH to the sections of the TMAs was performed using Spectrum Orange-labeled probes for CCND1, MYC [both Vysis (Downers Grove, IL)], NRAS (PAC RP5–1000E10), and STK15 [PAC RP5-1167H4, both (RZPD German Resource Center, Berlin, Germany)], and Spectrum Green-labeled centromeric probes of the chromosomes 1, 8, 11, and 20 (Vysis). Pretreatment of slides, hybridization, posthybridization processing, and signal detection were performed as described previously (22) .

Medulloblastoma samples showing sufficient FISH efficiency (> 90% nuclei with signals) were evaluated, with 100 intact nuclei scored for the number of signals. Tumor signals were scored as gains when at least 10% of cells showed three or more signals of the oncogene probe. Three to seven signals/cell were considered as low level gains, whereas eight or more signals as well as tight signal clusters were counted as high level gains. The signals of the centromeric probes were used to control adequate hybridization and to exclude artifacts.

Statistical Analysis.
Primary end point of the study was OS. To identify single genes which expression levels were possibly predictive for OS, we applied genewise proportional hazards models. This approach takes into account that all patients have a different follow-up time. For each gene, the estimated hazard ratio and its 95% confidence interval were determined for an increase of expression levels from the lower to the upper quartile to obtain comparable results for all genes analyzed. A generalized likelihood ratio test was performed for each gene to determine whether these changes in gene expression in relation to OS were of statistical significance. We used a hazard ratio of >2.5 (i.e., 5:2) as cutoff level to identify a set of genes associated with unfavorable OS, whereas a hazard ratio of <0.4 (i.e., 2:5) was used to obtain genes predicting for favorable survival.

Survival probabilities were estimated by the method described by Kaplan and Meier. All genes analyzed by TMA that showed a statistically significant effect in the log-rank test (cyclin D1, stathmin 1, and STK15) were also tested in a multivariate proportional hazards regression model together with clinically defined variables such as age, gender, and metastatic stage. An effect was considered statistically significant if the P was <=0.05. The statistical analyses were performed using the software package SPSS 11.5 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL) as well as the software package R, version 1.7 (23) .


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Characterization of the Study Population.
To analyze whether clinicopathological characteristics predict for OS among all 180 patients included in the TMA study, we performed a statistical analysis (Table 2)Citation . Although metastatic stage at diagnosis and anaplastic tumor grade were identified as significant predictors for unfavorable OS, the application of adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a favorable outcome. This finding suggests that a representative group of medulloblastoma patients was included in the study. In a multivariate model, only metastatic stage (hazard ratio = 2.35, P = 0.03), and the application of chemotherapy remained statistically significant (hazard ratio = –3.26, P = 0.008).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Univariate analysis (log-rank test) of clinicopathological features for 180 medulloblastoma patients included in the tissue microarray study

 
Identification of Potential Candidate Genes Related to Medulloblastoma Survival.
To identify genes in which expression levels might be predictive for OS, a genewise proportional hazard model was applied (see "Materials and Methods"). A combination of relevance (hazard ratio) and significance (likelihood ratio test) was used to select a set of genes as possibly prognostic factors for OS. On the basis of their hazard ratios (>2.5) and Ps (P < 0.05), we selected 54 genes with expression levels predicting for unfavorable survival (Table 3)Citation . Of this set of genes, MKI67, SOX4, and stathmin 1 were the genes most abundantly expressed in medulloblastoma (>3-fold) in comparison to the human reference RNA. Functionally, the genes are involved in a variety of biological processes such as cell cycle control and proliferation (cyclin B1, cyclin D1, CCNH, CDK8, CDKN2D, MCM5, MKI67, stathmin 1, and TOP2A), as well as RAS/MAPK-signaling (MAPK1, MAPK6, NRAS, and RHEB2). Notably, several genes code for viral oncogene homologues (NRAS, AKT2, MYC, ERBB3, REL, and MPL). In addition, we selected 27 genes with expression levels predicting for favorable survival (hazard ratio < 0.4, P < 0.05; Table 4Citation ).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3 Genes in which expression levels correlate with unfavorable survival in 35 medulloblastoma patients

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4 Genes in which expression levels correlate with favorable survival in 35 medulloblastoma patients

 
A hierarchical cluster analysis was performed using both sets of genes predicting for favorable and unfavorable OS to group patients according to their expression levels of these 81 genes (Fig. 1)Citation . The dendrogram shows four distinct clusters (Fig. 2)Citation . All but 2 samples of medulloblastoma patients who died within the first year after operation were found in cluster 1A, whereas 2 of the youngest patients of the nonsurvivors (2 and 4 years of age) were grouped into cluster 2B. These two clusters, 1A and 2B, include 10 of 12 patients with anaplastic histology and 12 of 15 patients with metastatic disease.



View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. Hierarchical cluster analysis of genes in which expression levels predicted for survival in 35 medulloblastoma patients. The genes were identified by a genewise proportional hazard model. A hazard ratio of >2.5 and P of the likelihood ratio test of <0.05 as cutoff levels were used to identify 54 genes associated with unfavorable OS, whereas a hazard ratio of <0.4 together with P of <0.05 was used to obtain 27 genes predicting for favorable survival. For illustration, each gene was normalized to the mean expression of all patients. Highly expressed genes are shown in red, whereas genes that are expressed at lower levels are displayed in green.

 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. Dendrogram from the hierarchical cluster analysis (Fig. 1)Citation of genes, the expression levels of which predicted for favorable (n = 27) and unfavorable (n = 54) survival in 35 medulloblastoma patients. The dendrogram shows four major clusters. The survival status at 1 year (alive versus dead), histology (anaplastic versus classic), metastatic stage (M stage; 0–3), and patient age at diagnosis are indicated for each patient. All but 2 samples of medulloblastoma patients who died within the first year after operation clustered into cluster 1A, whereas two of the youngest patients who died (2 and 4 years of age) were grouped into cluster 2B.

 
Protein Expression of Potential Candidate Genes Tested on TMAs by IHC.
For additional analysis on TMAs by IHC, we selected nine promising candidate genes based on their potential involvement in medulloblastoma tumorigenesis from the set of genes associated with unfavorable survival in medulloblastoma (Appendix 1, Fig. 1Citation ). We found a positive immunostaining for DAXX in 64%, cMYC in 57%, STK15 in 53%, NRAS in 47%, cyclin B1 in 46%, stathmin 1 in 46%, cyclin D1 in 43%, Ki-67 in 43%, and p53 in 10% of samples. When the results of immunolabeling were analyzed with respect to the OS, we found a positive staining for cyclin D1, stathmin 1, and STK15 being associated with an unfavorable OS (Fig. 3Citation , Table 5Citation ), whereas no statistical significance was obtained for cMYC, cyclin B1, DAXX, NRAS, Ki-67, and p53 staining. The expression of cyclin D1, stathmin 1, and STK15 did not correlate with the metastatic stage, age, or gender of the patients. To analyze whether cyclin D1, stathmin 1, and STK15 are independent prognostic markers for OS in medulloblastoma when criteria such as M stage, age, gender, extent of tumor resection, application of chemotherapy, and tumor grade were known, we performed a multivariate proportional hazards regression analysis (Table 6)Citation . Although the expression of STK15 (P = 0.026) was identified as independent prognostic marker, this did not apply for cyclin D1 (P = 0.18) and stathmin 1 (P = 0.19).



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 3. Effect of STK15, stathmin 1, and cyclin D1 mRNA and protein expression on survival in medulloblastoma patients. High (top quartile) versus low (bottom quartile) levels of STK15 (A), stathmin 1 (B), and cyclin D1 (C) were associated with an unfavorable survival as analyzed by cDNA microarray experiments (n = 35). The protein expression of STK15 (D), stathmin 1 (E), and cyclin D1 (F) was analyzed in a large series of 180 patients on tumor tissue microarrays. STK15 (G), stathmin 1 (H), and cyclin D1 (I) were determined on the basis of immunohistochemical analysis in which tumors were classified as positive when >10% of the tumor cells were stained. In line with the results obtained by cDNA microarray experiments, we found a positive staining for STK15 (D), stathmin 1 (E), and cyclin D1 (F) associated with an unfavorable OS.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 5 Univariate analysis (log-rank test) of cMYC, cyclin B1, cyclin D1, DAXX, Ki-67, NRAS, p53, stathmin 1, and STK15 expression analyzed by IHCa on tissue microarrays in 180 medulloblastoma patients

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 6 STK15 protein expression is an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in 180 medulloblastoma patients

The prognostic role of cyclin D1, STK15, and stathmin 1 expression was analyzed together with clinical parameters in a multivariate proportional hazards regression model.

 
Testing for Additional Gene Copy Numbers of Potential Candidate Genes on TMAs by FISH.
FISH analysis for additional gene copy numbers of cyclin D1, MYC, NRAS, and STK15 yielded evaluable results in 100, 100, 89, and 58% of arrayed tumors (Table 7)Citation . None evaluable tumors were attributable to loss of individual samples during processing or lack of probe hybridization. High level gains of MYC were found in 6.7% of samples (Fig. 4A)Citation . These amplifications were of statistical significance for a worse survival prognosis (log-rank test, P = 0.003); all 12 medulloblastoma patients carrying high level gains of MYC died within 5 years after treatment (Fig. 4B)Citation . In addition, low level gains were found for cyclin D1 in 4.4%, MYC in 7.8%, NRAS in 5.6%, and STK15 in 32.5% of tumors (Table 6)Citation . In comparison to patients with two signals/cell, patients with increased gene copies of STK15 (Fig. 4C)Citation displayed an OS of only 37 versus 63% at 5 years (log-rank test, P = 0.05; Fig. 4DCitation ). Of these 104 tumors analyzed by FISH, 15 were also included in the gene expression profiling study. In average, the 6 tumors with additional gene copy numbers of STK15 displayed 1.7-fold higher gene expression levels of STK15 as compared with nine samples with a normal gene copy number count (Mann-Whitney U test, P = 0.01).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 7 Frequency of low and high level gains for all the oncogenes analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization in medulloblastoma samples

 


View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 4. Additional gene copy numbers of MYC and STK15 detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization are correlated with an unfavorable survival in medulloblastoma patients (C and D). Examples of dual-color fluorescence in situ hybridization, demonstrating localization of the MYC (A) and STK15 probes (B, red signals), as well as their corresponding centromeric probes of chromosome 8 (A) and 20 (B, green signals). High level gains (HLGs) of MYC (C) as well as low level gains of STK15 (D, LLGs) are predictors for an adverse outcome in medulloblastoma patients. Three to seven signals/cell were considered as LLGs, whereas eight or more signals as well as tight signal clusters were counted as HLGs.

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The aim of the present study was the identification of potential candidate genes predicting for survival in medulloblastoma using the combined approach of cDNA and TMA technologies. We identified 81 genes in which expression levels correlated with OS. A hierarchical cluster analysis showed that most medulloblastoma patients with anaplastic histology and disseminated disease were grouped together with patients who died. In line with this finding, anaplastic and metastatic medulloblastomas have been correlated with genetic alterations as 17p loss and oncogene amplifications of MYC and NMYC that are associated with unfavorable survival (15 , 24) .

In detail, we identified 54 and 27 genes with expression levels predicting for unfavorable and favorable prognosis in medulloblastoma, respectively. The genes predicting for poor outcome comprise those that are involved in cell cycle activation and mitosis, DNA metabolism, or code for viral oncogenes. Some of these genes (MYC, SOX4, and NRAS) have been previously reported to be involved in medulloblastoma tumorigenesis and associated with unfavorable outcome (10 , 11 , 13 , 25) . Concordantly, the potential role of platelet-derived growth factor receptor and downstream activation of the RAS/MAPK signaling pathway for metastasis in medulloblastoma was outlined by MacDonald et al. (13) . The list of unfavorable genes also includes MGMT, which codes for the DNA repair protein O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase. Bacolod et al. (26) found that MGMT protein expression confers resistance to alkylating drugs in medulloblastoma-derived cell lines. The MGMT-mediated resistance to alkylating agents might be of importance because these drugs (e.g., lomustine) have been included in treatment protocols for medulloblastoma patients (2 , 16) .

Our set of genes, predicting for favorable prognosis, comprises TMSB4X, of which, expression is closely related to cerebellar differentiation (27) and PRDX1, which has been recently identified as candidate for tumor suppression (28) . Furthermore, we identified genes that have apoptosis-related functions (CASP10 and TRADD), are involved in inflammatory and immune response processes (IRF3 and IL11RA) or code for zinc finger proteins (ZNF9 and ZNF162).

Gains of chromosomes 7 or 17q were described in up to 60% of all medulloblastoma samples (5 , 8 , 24) . Interestingly, none of the genes associated with good prognosis were located on these chromosomal regions. In contrast, the set of genes predicting for adverse outcome included four genes located on chromosome 7 (RHEB2, YWHAG, PMS2, and PMSB1) and four genes on 17q (ARHGDIA, NSF, TOP2A, and TUBG1). This finding suggests that a cooperative selective growth advantage for medulloblastoma cases with alterations on chromosome 7 and 17q may exist, thus explaining the high frequency of aberrations involving both chromosomes along with the finding that high expression levels of genes located on both chromosomal regions correlated with an unfavorable survival.

In line with the results obtained by cDNA microarray experiments, a high expression of cyclin D1, STK15, and stathmin 1 on the protein level correlated with adverse prognosis in medulloblastoma. In contrast, no correlation between gene expression and IHC was found for cMYC, cyclin B1, DAXX, Ki-67, NRAS, and p53. To some extent, the discrepancies found for these genes on the protein and mRNA level might be related to different follow-up times of the patients included in the TMA and cDNA microarray studies (median follow-up time of 34 versus 24 months). On the other hand, the lack in correlation might be related to the short half-life time of some proteins. Formally, immunohistochemical heterogeneity of the tumor samples cannot be excluded, thus explaining the limitations of the TMA technology. Previous studies showed, however, that intratumor heterogeneity does not significantly affect the ability to detect clinicopathological correlations on TMAs, at least when two (as in our study) or more cores of each tumor are present on the TMAs (29) . To see an influence on OS, the total amount of the accumulated proteins probably needs to exceed a certain cellular cutoff level. Therefore, additional studies are needed to determine robust standardized cutoff values for different antibodies to define protein overexpression in medulloblastoma.

Recently, cyclin D1 was identified as an important mediator of Sonic hedgehog-induced proliferation in cerebellar granule cell precursors, which are a common target of transformation in medulloblastoma (30) . Because 20–30% of sporadic medulloblastomas harbor mutation in patched and other elements of the Sonic hedgehog pathway (31) , cyclin D1 appears particularly intriguing with respect to medulloblastoma tumorigenesis. Both STK15 and stathmin 1 play an important role in the adequate segregation of chromosomes during mitosis. Mitotic defects might be a crucial event in medulloblastoma pathogenesis because aneuploidy is a common finding (5 , 24) . Stathmin 1 is a cytosolic phosphoprotein that is involved in cellular proliferation because its major function is to promote depolymerization of spindle microtubules. In Wilms tumors, stathmin 1 was found highly expressed in more advanced stages of disease (32) . In addition, high protein expression of stathmin 1 correlated with poor prognosis in breast cancer (33) . Several studies showed that stathmin 1 is a potential therapeutic target because a stathmin 1-transfected lung cancer cell line increased the sensitivity to Vinca alkaloids (34) , and antisense inhibition of stathmin 1 expression showed a synergistic apoptotic effect in combination with paclitaxel treatment (35) .

The STK15 gene is localized on chromosome 20q13, a region amplified in a variety of human malignancies, including medulloblastoma (5) . Additional gene copies of STK15 were described in primary tumors of the breast (36) , cervix (37) , bladder (38) , colon (39) , and brain (40) and reported to be associated with aneuploidy and tumor transformation. Because recent studies showed that overexpression of STK15 results in aberration of chromosomes and transformation of the cells, STK15 might contribute to an increasing karyotypic instability and tumor progression in medulloblastoma (36) .

When the prognostic significance of cyclin D1, STK15, and stathmin 1 protein expression was compared with clinically defined parameters, STK15 was identified as the only independent predictor for survival in medulloblastoma. Notably, STK15 expression was statistically more significant than the metastatic stage at diagnosis. This is in line with recent studies, showing that outcome predictors based on molecular markers are able to exceed well defined clinical parameters (3 , 11 , 12) .

In the current study, high level gains of MYC as well as low level gains of STK15 predicted for an unfavorable outcome of medulloblastoma patients. The frequency of MYC amplifications in the present study (6.7%) as well as their significance for survival is in line with previous studies (8 , 10 , 24) , whereas additional gene copies of STK15, which we found in approximately one-third of medulloblastoma samples have not been described previously. In addition, low level gains of STK15 were associated with a higher expression (1.7-fold) of this gene at the transcriptional level, suggesting a gene-dosis effect. Notably, increased gene copy numbers of STK15, as well as its high expression on the mRNA and protein level, correlated with an adverse outcome in medulloblastoma. Thus, STK15 may serve as a potent molecular target for additional medulloblastoma treatment because the inhibition of STK15 gene expression by antisense oligonucleotides resulted in the arrest of cell growth and increased apoptosis in cancer cell lines (41) .

In summary, the combination of gene expression profiling with TMA technology seems to be a powerful approach for the identification of potent candidate genes predicting for survival in medulloblastoma. Of the results highlighted by the various data analysis procedures, genes associated with cell cycle control and mitosis like cyclin D1, STK15, and stathmin 1 appear particularly intriguing with respect to medulloblastoma pathomechanism and might be promising targets to improve the cure rates in this disease.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Heidi Kramer and Frauke Devens for their excellent technical assistance as well as Frank Mendrzyk and Daniel Goettel for their support in microarray experiments.


    FOOTNOTES
 
Grant support: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung Grants FKZ 01 KW 9937 and NGFN, 01 GR 0101. K. Neben is scholar of the Deutsche José Carreras Leukämie-Stiftung e.V. Grant DJCLS 2001/NAT-3.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Note: K. Neben and A. Korshunov contributed equally to this work.

Requests for reprints: Peter Lichter, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Division of Molecular Genetics (B060), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany. Phone: 49-6221-42-4619; Fax: 49-6221-42-4639; E-mail: m.macleod{at}dkfz.de

5 Internet address: http://www.dkfz.de/kompl_genome/Other/medulloblastoma.zip Back

Received 12/18/03. Revised 2/ 6/04. Accepted 2/12/04.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Gurney JG, Kadan-Lottick N Brain and other central nervous system tumors: rates, trends, and epidemiology. Curr Opin Oncol, 13: 160-6, 2001.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Zeltzer PM, Boyett JM, Finlay JL, et al Metastasis stage, adjuvant treatment, and residual tumor are prognostic factors for medulloblastoma in children: conclusions from the Children’s Cancer Group 921 randomized Phase III study. J Clin Oncol, 17: 832-45, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Gilbertson R, Wickramasinghe C, Hernan R, et al Clinical and molecular stratification of disease risk in medulloblastoma. Br J Cancer, 85: 705-12, 2001.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Bhattacharjee MB, Armstrong DD, Vogel H, Cooley LD Cytogenetic analysis of 120 primary pediatric brain tumors and literature review. Cancer Genet Cytogenet, 97: 39-53, 1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Bayani J, Zielenska M, Marrano P, et al Molecular cytogenetic analysis of medulloblastomas and supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumors by using conventional banding, comparative genomic hybridization, and spectral karyotyping. J Neurosurg, 93: 437-48, 2000.[Medline]
  6. Emadian SM, McDonald JD, Gerken SC, Fults D Correlation of chromosome 17p loss with clinical outcome in medulloblastoma. Clin Cancer Res, 2: 1559-64, 1996.[Abstract]
  7. Biegel JA, Janss AJ, Raffel C, et al Prognostic significance of chromosome 17p deletions in childhood primitive neuroectodermal tumors (medulloblastomas) of the central nervous system. Clin Cancer Res, 3: 473-8, 1997.[Abstract]
  8. Reardon DA, Michalkiewicz E, Boyett JM, et al Extensive genomic abnormalities in childhood medulloblastoma by comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Res, 57: 4042-7, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Scheurlen WG, Seranski P, Mincheva A, et al High-resolution deletion mapping of chromosome arm 17p in childhood primitive neuroectodermal tumors reveals a common chromosomal disruption within the Smith-Magenis region, an unstable region in chromosome band 17p11.2. Genes Chromosomes Cancer, 18: 50-8, 1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Scheurlen WG, Schwabe GC, Joos S, Mollenhauer J, Sorensen N, Kuhl J Molecular analysis of childhood primitive neuroectodermal tumors defines markers associated with poor outcome. J Clin Oncol, 16: 2478-85, 1998.[Abstract]
  11. Grotzer MA, Hogarty MD, Janss AJ, et al MYC messenger RNA expression predicts survival outcome in childhood primitive neuroectodermal tumor/medulloblastoma. Clin Cancer Res, 7: 2425-33, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Pomeroy SL, Tamayo P, Gaasenbeek M, et al Prediction of central nervous system embryonal tumour outcome based on gene expression. Nature (Lond.), 415: 436-42, 2002.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. MacDonald TJ, Brown KM, LaFleur B, et al Expression profiling of medulloblastoma: PDGFRA and the RAS/MAPK pathway as therapeutic targets for metastatic disease. Nat Genet, 29: 143-52, 2001.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Kallioniemi OP, Wagner U, Kononen J, Sauter G Tissue microarray technology for high-throughput molecular profiling of cancer. Hum Mol Genet, 10: 657-62, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Eberhart CG, Burger PC Anaplasia and grading in medulloblastomas. Brain Pathol, 13: 376-85, 2003.[Medline]
  16. Kortmann RD, Kuhl J, Timmermann B, et al Postoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radiotherapy as compared to immediate radiotherapy followed by maintenance chemotherapy in the treatment of medulloblastoma in childhood: results of the German prospective randomized trial HIT ’91. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 46: 269-79, 2000.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Fritz B, Schubert F, Wrobel G, et al Microarray based copy number and expression profiling in dedifferentiated and pleomorphic liposarcoma. Cancer Res, 62: 2993-8, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Neben K, Tews B, Wrobel G, et al Gene expression patterns in acute myeloid leukemia correlate with centrosome aberrations and numerical chromosome changes. Oncogene, 23: 2379-84, 2004.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Korshunov A, Neben K, Wrobel G, et al Gene expression patterns in ependymomas correlate with tumor location, grade and patient age. Am J Pathol, 163: 1721-7, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Huber W, von Heydebreck A, Sueltmann H, Poustka A, Vingron M Variance stabilization applied to microarray data calibration and to the quantification of differential expression. Bioinformatics, 18: 96-104, 2002.
  21. Freier K, Joos S, Flechtenmacher C, et al Tissue microarray analysis reveals site-specific prevalence of oncogene amplifications in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res, 63: 1179-82, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Bubendorf L, Kononen J, Koivisto P, et al Survey of gene amplifications during prostate cancer progression by high-throughput fluorescence in situ hybridization on tissue microarrays. Cancer Res, 59: 803-6, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Ihaka R, Gentleman R A language for data analysis and graphics. J Comput Graph Stat, 5: 299-314, 1996.[CrossRef]
  24. Ellison D Classifying the medulloblastoma: insights from morphology and molecular genetics. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol, 28: 257-82, 2002.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Lee CJ, Appleby VJ, Orme AT, Chan WI, Scotting PJ Differential expression of SOX4 and SOX11 in medulloblastoma. J Neurooncol, 57: 201-14, 2002.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Bacolod MD, Johnson SP, Ali-Osman F, et al Mechanisms of resistance to 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea in human medulloblastoma and rhabdomyosarcoma. Mol Cancer Ther, 1: 727-36, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Carpinterio P, Anadon R, del Amo FF, Gomez-Marquez J The thymosin ß 4 gene is strongly activated in neural tissues during early postimplantation mouse development. Neurosci Lett, 184: 63-6, 1995.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Neumann CA, Krause DS, Carman CV, et al Essential role for the peroxiredoxin Prdx1 in erythrocyte antioxidant defence and tumour suppression. Nature (Lond.), 424: 561-5, 2003.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Nocito A, Bubendorf L, Maria Tinner E, et al Microarrays of bladder cancer tissue are highly representative of proliferation index and histological grade. J Pathol, 194: 349-57, 2001.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Oliver TG, Grasfeder LL, Carroll AL, et al Transcriptional profiling of the Sonic hedgehog response: a critical role for N-myc in proliferation of neuronal precursors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 100: 7331-6, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Taylor MD, Liu L, Raffel C, et al Mutations in SUFU predispose to medulloblastoma. Nat Genet, 31: 306-10, 2002.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Takahashi M, Yang XJ, Lavery TT, et al Gene expression profiling of favorable histology Wilms tumors and its correlation with clinical features. Cancer Res, 62: 6598-605, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Brattsand G Correlation of oncoprotein 18/stathmin expression in human breast cancer with established prognostic factors. Br J Cancer, 83: 311-8, 2000.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Nishio K, Nakamura T, Koh Y, Kanzawa F, Tamura T, Saijo N Oncoprotein 18 overexpression increases the sensitivity to vindesine in the human lung carcinoma cells. Cancer (Phila.), 91: 1494-9, 2001.
  35. Iancu C, Mistry SJ, Arkin S, Atweh GF Taxol and anti-stathmin therapy: a synergistic combination that targets the mitotic spindle. Cancer Res, 60: 3537-41, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Zhou H, Kuang J, Zhong L, et al Tumour amplified kinase STK15/BTAK induces centrosome amplification, aneuploidy and transformation. Nat Genet, 20: 189-93, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Moreno-Bueno G, Sanchez-Estevez C, Cassia R, et al Differential gene expression profile in endometrioid and nonendometrioid endometrial carcinoma: STK15 is frequently overexpressed and amplified in nonendometrioid carcinomas. Cancer Res, 63: 5697-702, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Sen S, Zhou H, Zhang RD, et al Amplification/overexpression of a mitotic kinase gene in human bladder cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst (Bethesda), 94: 1320-9, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Bischoff JR, Anderson L, Zhu Y, et al A homologue of Drosophila aurora kinase is oncogenic and amplified in human colorectal cancers. EMBO J, 17: 3052-65, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Reichardt W, Jung V, Brunner C, et al The putative serine/threonine kinase gene STK15 on chromosome 20q13.2 is amplified in human gliomas. Oncol Rep, 10: 1275-9, 2003.[Medline]
  41. Rojanala S, Han H, Munoz RM, et al Aurora kinase-2a potential molecular therapeutic target for pancreatic cancers. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res, 43: 665 2002.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
R. Saab, C. Rodriguez-Galindo, K. Matmati, J. E. Rehg, S. H. Baumer, J. D. Khoury, C. Billups, G. Neale, K. J. Helton, and S. X. Skapek
p18Ink4c and p53 Act as Tumor Suppressors in Cyclin D1-Driven Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumor
Cancer Res., January 15, 2009; 69(2): 440 - 448.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Marchini, P. Mariani, G. Chiorino, E. Marrazzo, R. Bonomi, R. Fruscio, L. Clivio, A. Garbi, V. Torri, M. Cinquini, et al.
Analysis of Gene Expression in Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2008; 14(23): 7850 - 7860.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
J. Yuan, J. Ma, H. Zheng, T. Shi, W. Sun, Q. Zhang, D. Lin, K. Zhang, J. He, Y. Mao, et al.
Overexpression of OLC1, Cigarette Smoke, and Human Lung Tumorigenesis
J Natl Cancer Inst, November 19, 2008; 100(22): 1592 - 1605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
T. de Haas, N. Hasselt, D. Troost, H. Caron, M. Popovic, L. Zadravec-Zaletel, W. Grajkowska, M. Perek, M.-C. Osterheld, D. Ellison, et al.
Molecular Risk Stratification of Medulloblastoma Patients Based on Immunohistochemical Analysis of MYC, LDHB, and CCNB1 Expression
Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2008; 14(13): 4154 - 4160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
O. Gautschi, J. Heighway, P. C. Mack, P. R. Purnell, P. N. Lara Jr., and D. R. Gandara
Aurora Kinases as Anticancer Drug Targets
Clin. Cancer Res., March 15, 2008; 14(6): 1639 - 1648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
E. Ogawa, K. Takenaka, H. Katakura, M. Adachi, Y. Otake, Y. Toda, H. Kotani, T. Manabe, H. Wada, and F. Tanaka
Perimembrane Aurora-A Expression is a Significant Prognostic Factor in Correlation with Proliferative Activity in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Ann. Surg. Oncol., February 1, 2008; 15(2): 547 - 554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neuro OncolHome page
J. M. de Bont, J. M. Kros, M. M.C.J. Passier, R. E. Reddingius, P. A.E. S. Smitt, T. M. Luider, M. L. d. Boer, and R. Pieters
Differential expression and prognostic significance of SOX genes in pediatric medulloblastoma and ependymoma identified by microarray analysis
Neuro-oncol, January 1, 2008; 10(5): 648 - 660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neuro OncolHome page
J. M. de Bont, R. J. Packer, E. M. Michiels, M. L. d. Boer, and R. Pieters
Biological background of pediatric medulloblastoma and ependymoma: A review from a translational research perspective
Neuro-oncol, January 1, 2008; 10(6): 1040 - 1060.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
J. R. Pollack
A Perspective on DNA Microarrays in Pathology Research and Practice
Am. J. Pathol., August 1, 2007; 171(2): 375 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Cancer ResHome page
J. Fu, M. Bian, Q. Jiang, and C. Zhang
Roles of Aurora Kinases in Mitosis and Tumorigenesis
Mol. Cancer Res., January 1, 2007; 5(1): 1 - 10.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
R. Reiter, P. Gais, U. Jutting, M. K. Steuer-Vogt, A. Pickhard, K. Bink, S. Rauser, S. Lassmann, H. Hofler, M. Werner, et al.
Aurora Kinase A Messenger RNA Overexpression Is Correlated with Tumor Progression and Shortened Survival in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2006; 12(17): 5136 - 5141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
M. Okamoto, T. Utsunomiya, S. Wakiyama, M. Hashimoto, K. Fukuzawa, T. Ezaki, T. Hanai, H. Inoue, and M. Mori
Specific Gene-Expression Profiles of Noncancerous Liver Tissue Predict the Risk for Multicentric Occurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Hepatitis C Virus-Positive Patients
Ann. Surg. Oncol., July 1, 2006; 13(7): 947 - 954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
F. Mendrzyk, A. Korshunov, A. Benner, G. Toedt, S. Pfister, B. Radlwimmer, and P. Lichter
Identification of gains on 1q and epidermal growth factor receptor overexpression as independent prognostic markers in intracranial ependymoma.
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2006; 12(7): 2070 - 2079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
F. Lopez-Rios, S. Chuai, R. Flores, S. Shimizu, T. Ohno, K. Wakahara, P. B. Illei, S. Hussain, L. Krug, M. F. Zakowski, et al.
Global Gene Expression Profiling of Pleural Mesotheliomas: Overexpression of Aurora Kinases and P16/CDKN2A Deletion as Prognostic Factors and Critical Evaluation of Microarray-Based Prognostic Prediction.
Cancer Res., March 15, 2006; 66(6): 2970 - 2979.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
F. Mendrzyk, B. Radlwimmer, S. Joos, F. Kokocinski, A. Benner, D. E. Stange, K. Neben, H. Fiegler, N. P. Carter, G. Reifenberger, et al.
Genomic and Protein Expression Profiling Identifies CDK6 As Novel Independent Prognostic Marker in Medulloblastoma
J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2005; 23(34): 8853 - 8862.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
K. M. Egan, P. A. Newcomb, C. B. Ambrosone, A. Trentham-Dietz, L. Titus-Ernstoff, J. M. Hampton, M. T. Kimura, and H. Nagase
STK15 polymorphism and breast cancer risk in a population-based study
Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2004; 25(11): 2149 - 2153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neben, K.
Right arrow Articles by Lichter, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Neben, K.
Right arrow Articles by Lichter, P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online