| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Cell and Tumor Biology |
Institut für Physiologie, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
Requests for reprints: Joachim Fandrey, Institut für Physiologie, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany. Phone: 49-201-723-4600; Fax: 49-201-723-4648; E-mail: joachim.fandrey{at}uni-essen.de.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
under normoxic conditions and amplified hypoxic HIF-1 activation. IL-1ß treatment affected neither HIF-1
mRNA levels nor the hydroxylation status of HIF-1
and, thus, stability of the protein. Instead cycloheximide effectively prevented the increase in HIF-1
protein, indicating a stimulatory effect of IL-1ß on HIF-1
translation. Finally, treatment of HIF-1
with short interfering RNA revealed a significant role for HIF-1 in the IL-1ßdependent stimulation of ADM expression. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and a constitutive HIF-1ß subunit, which both belong to the family of basic helix-loop-helix and PAS domain proteins (12, 13). HIF-1 activity is primarily regulated by the abundance and activity of the
subunit. HIF-1
is degraded under normoxic conditions, which is initiated by hydroxylation of the proline residues 402 and 564 by oxygen-dependent proline hydroxylases (14). Binding of the von Hippel-Lindau tumor supressor gene product (pVHL) to hydroxy-proline HIF-1
(OH-HIF-1
) targets the subunit for proteasomal degradation (15). In addition, hydroxylation of the asparagine residue 803 within the COOH-terminal transactivating domain of human HIF-1
by the O2-sensitive asparagyl-hydroxylase factor inhibiting HIF-1 regulates the interaction of HIF-1
with transcriptional coactivators like CBP/p300 (16). Under hypoxic conditions, HIF-1
is stabilized, translocates into the nucleus where it dimerizes with HIF-1ß, and transactivates genes containing hypoxia-response elements within their promoter or enhancer.
Despite intensive studies, understanding of the nonhypoxic regulation of HIF-1 is still limited. Bacterial lipopolysaccharides as well as proinflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin 1ß (IL-1ß) and tumor necrosis factor
(TNF
), are able to increase HIF-1
protein and enhance the HIF-1 DNA binding (17, 18). For different cell types it was proposed that mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways and activation of nuclear factor-
B (NF-
B) are involved in cytokine-induced HIF-1 stabilization (19, 20). Interestingly, proinflammatory cytokines and lipopolysaccharides inhibit the hypoxic induction of the classically HIF-1regulated gene erythropoietin despite their HIF-activating effects (21). In contrast to erythropoietin, ADM expression is induced both by hypoxia and by lipopolysaccharides but the role of HIF-1 for both stimuli has not been resolved (22).
In human ovarian carcinoma, a significant correlation exists between expression levels of ADM and clinical outcome of the patients (23). Tumors expressing high levels of ADM are associated with a very low survival time. ADM seems to enhance the proliferation of ovarian carcinoma but stimuli that lead to a dramatic increase in ADM expression in certain types of tumors are not well defined. Hypoxic foci within the tumors as well as high levels of inflammatory cytokines secreted by tumor-associated macrophages have been found in different types of tumors (24).
To study the role of hypoxia and the inflammatory cytokine IL-1ß in the induction of the ADM gene, we used the human ovarian carcinoma cell line OVCAR-3. Hypoxia and IL-1ß induced the accumulation of HIF-1
, and treatment with short interfering RNA (siRNA) against HIF-1
revealed the importance of this transcription factor for ADM expression in response to both stimuli.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(10 ng/mL), and IL-6 (5 pg/mL; all from Calbiochem, Heidelberg, Germany) were added to the ovarian carcinoma cells for 1 to 24 hours under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. The concentrations used in the experiments were not toxic for the cells as judged by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay (25). Dimethyloxalylglycine, as a substrate analogue of
-ketoglutarate and inhibitor of HIF prolyl hydroxylases, was kindly provided by Eric Metzen.
RNA preparation and reverse transcription-PCR. Total RNA was isolated by the acidic guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction method (26). One microgram of total RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA with oligodT15 as primer for reverse transcriptase (avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase, Promega, Heidelberg, Germany). Qualitative PCRs were carried out for the housekeeping genes ß-actin, HIF-1
, and ADM to estimate the amount of specific cDNA before real-time PCR. The resulting PCR fragments were visualized on ethidium bromidestained 1.5% agarose gels. Primers for real-time PCR were designed with the Primer Express software (Applied Biosystems, Weiterstadt, Germany): amplicon sizes of about 100 bp, annealing temperature of 60°C, and CG content of about 60% were preferred. Primer sequences used for qualitative and quantitative PCR are listed in Table 1.
|
Whole cell and nuclear extract preparation. For preparation of whole cell extracts, cells were washed with ice-cold PBS, drained, then lysed on the plates with 100 µL extract buffer [300 mmol/L NaCl, 10 mmol/L Tris (pH 7.9), 1 mmol/L EDTA, 0.1% NP40, 1x Protease-Inhibitor-Cocktail; Roche] for 20 minutes on ice. The extract was spun down in a microcentrifuge (5,000 rpm, 4°C, 5 minutes), quantitated using the Bio-Rad Laboratories protein assay reagent, and stored at 80°C.
Nuclear proteins were prepared from 60 mm dishes of subconfluent cells using the method of Schreiber et al. (27). All procedures were carried out at 4°C. After incubation, cells were washed with ice-cold PBS, drained and scraped from the plates with 150 µL buffer A [10 mmol/L HEPES (pH 7.9), 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 10 mmol/L KCl, 0.5 mmol/L phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), 0.5 mmol/L DTT, 0.4% NP40 Igepal, 1x protease inhibitor cocktail; Roche], and incubated for 20 minutes on ice. Cell lysates were centrifuged at 5,000 rpm at 4°C for 5 minutes and the supernatants were used as cytoplasmic fraction. Pellets were resolved in 80 µL buffer B [20 mmol/L HEPES (pH 7.9), 420 mmol/L NaCl, 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.2 mmol/L EDTA, 0.5 mmol/L PMSF, 0.5 mmol/L DTT, 1x protease inhibitor cocktail; Roche] and homogenized on a magnetic stirrer for 30 minutes. After centrifugation at 13,000 rpm at 4°C for 15 minutes, supernatants containing the nuclear proteins were transferred to 80°C. Protein concentrations were determined using the Bio-Rad kit.
Western blot analysis. After addition of 1/4 volume of sample buffer [50 mmol/L Tris (pH 6.8), 2% SDS, 5% ß-mercaptoethanol, 0.0125% bromophenol blue, 1% glycine], 50 to 75 µg of total cell lysate or 10 to 20 µg of nuclear extract per lane were subjected to 7.5% SDS-PAGE and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (0.2 µm pore size, Schleicher and Schuell, Dassel, Germany). The efficiency of protein transfer and equal loading was confirmed by staining the nitrocellulose membrane with Ponceau S (Sigma, Steinheim, Germany). Membranes were blocked overnight at 4°C with 5% nonfat dry milk in TBS-T [10 mmol/L Tris (pH 7.5), 100 mmol/L NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20], then washed in TBS-T and incubated with the respective primary antibody at room temperature for 2 hours with gentle shaking. Primary antibodies used were mouse monoclonal antibody raised against human HIF-1
(1:250, Transduction Laboratories, Heidelberg, Germany) and mouse monoclonal antibody raised against
-tubulin (1:500, Santa Cruz Biotech, Heidelberg, Germany). The polyclonal rabbit antibody directed against hydroxylated proline 564 in HIF-1
has been characterized and described earlier (28). After washing with TBS-T, the blot was incubated with horseradish peroxidaseconjugated anti-mouse or anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody (Sigma). Immunoreactive proteins were visualized using a chemiluminescence detection system [100 mmol/L Tris-Cl (pH 8.5), 2.65 mmol/L H2O2, 0.45 mmol/L luminol, 0.625 mmol/L p-coumaric acid] followed by exposure to X-ray films (Agfa, Mortsel, Belgium).
Immunofluorescence. OVCAR-3 cells were fixed in ice-cold methanol and acetone (1:1) for 10 minutes at 20°C, blocked with bovine serum albumin, and incubated with a monoclonal antiHIF-1
antibody (1:50, Transduction Laboratories) followed by an Alexa-Fluor 488conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (1:400, Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). The immunostained cells were visualized by fluorescence microscopy.
Hypoxia inducible factor 1
silencing with short interfering RNA. siRNA sequences were selected according to the instructions from Dharmacon (Lafayette, CO) for specific silencing of HIF-1
. The siRNA target sequence corresponds to nucleotides 641 to 662 of HIF-1
mRNA (NM_001530). HIF-1
siRNA with a 3' overhang of dTdT as well as siRNA directed against firefly luciferase (used as a negative control) was obtained from Dharmacon. Cells were transfected with 200 nmol/L siRNA using oligofectamine (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany) at 40% confluence of the cell monolayer. Experiments were started 24 hours later at 80% confluence.
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay. [
-32P]ATP was obtained from ICN (Eschwege, Germany). Oligonucleotides containing the sequence of the HIF-1 binding site from the vascular endothelial growth factor promoter (sense 5'-gttggagcccacgtatgcactgtg-3' and antisense: 5'-cacagtgcatacgtgggctccaac-3') as well as a classic NF-
B binding motif (sense 5'-agttgaggggactttcccaggc-3' and antisense 5'-gcctgggaaagtcccctcaact-3') were synthesized by Invitrogen. After 5'-end labeling of the sense strand not incorporated, ATP was removed with Bio-gel G30 columns (Bio-Rad, Munich, Germany). The annealing reaction was done in the presence of a 2-fold molar excess of unlabeled antisense oligonucleotide. Binding reactions were set up in a volume of 20 µL. Ten micrograms of nuclear extracts were preincubated on ice for 20 minutes in a binding-buffer [12 mmol/L HEPES (pH 7.9), 4 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.9), 60 mmol/L KCl, 1 mmol/L EDTA, 1 mmol/L DTT] with 100 ng thymus DNA. After the addition of [
-32P]ATP, the samples were incubated for 30 minutes at room temperature. For supershift assays, the samples were additionally incubated with an anti-HIF1
monoclonal antibody (Transduction Laboratories) for 16 hours at 4°C. Samples were subsequently resolved by electrophoresis on native 5% polyacrylamide gels at room temperature. Gels were dried and directly analyzed by autoradiography.
Statistics. Experiments were done in triplicate. Values of mRNA quantification are given as mean ± SE. Dunnett's test and Tukey-Kramer test were used to calculate statistically significant differences of means between treated and control groups.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
accumulation in OVCAR-3 cells. OVCAR-3 cells were incubated from 1 to 24 hours under hypoxic conditions (3% O2) to determine the time course for the induction of ADM gene expression in OVCAR-3 cells. Under normoxic conditions, a constitutive expression of the ADM gene was observed. The addition of IL-1ß (500 pg/mL) under normoxic (21% O2) conditions significantly enhanced ADM gene expression, resulting in a 12-fold increase of ADM mRNA levels after 24 hours of treatment with IL-1ß when compared with untreated controls (Fig. 1A). After 4 hours of hypoxia (3% O2), induction of the ADM gene expression became significant compared with ADM mRNA levels at the onset of hypoxia. IL-1ß did not significantly increase ADM mRNA levels over hypoxia-induced levels (Fig. 1B). It is of note, however, that hypoxic induction was 5-fold more potent than IL-1ß after 24 hours of stimulation. The inflammatory cytokines TNF
(10 ng/mL) and IL-6 (5 pg/mL) did not influence expression of the ADM gene in OVCAR-3 (data not shown).
|
during hypoxia. Cells were exposed to hypoxia (3% O2) for 2, 4, and 8 hours. Significant HIF-1
accumulation was first detected after 2 hours of hypoxic incubation (Fig. 2A). IL-1ß likewise induced HIF-1
accumulation even under normoxic conditions after 4 and 8 hours of incubation. At both time points, IL-1ß markedly enhanced the hypoxia-induced HIF-1
accumulation (Fig. 2A). Immunofluorescence staining of HIF-1
in OVCAR-3 cells showed that HIF-1
accumulated and was translocated to the nucleus under normoxic conditions after treatment with IL-1ß. Hypoxia-induced nuclear accumulation of HIF-1
was considerably amplified by IL-1ß (Fig. 2B).
|
protein content. To further characterize the mechanisms leading to enhanced HIF-1
accumulation during IL-1ß treatment, we first analyzed the expression of HIF-1
mRNA. Quantitation of HIF-1
mRNA revealed no significant increase by hypoxia or IL-1ß (Fig. 3A) although IL-1ßtreated cells tended to have somewhat higher HIF-1
mRNA levels. These results raised the question whether increased amounts of HIF-1
protein were the result of reduced degradation of the protein, due to effects of IL-1ß on proline hydroxylases, or increased translation of the mRNA.
|
(Fig. 3B) was done using an antibody specifically directed against OH-HIF-1
(28). If IL-1ß delayed HIF-1
degradation by inhibiting proline hydroxylases, the amount of OH-HIF-1
should be decreased upon cytokine treatment. To visualize OH-HIF-1
, proteasomal degradation was prevented by the proteasome inhibitor MG132 (10 µmol/L). As a positive control for HIF-1
accumulation due to inhibition of proline hydroxylases, the
-keto-glutarate analogue and proline hydroxylase inhibitor dimethyloxalylglycine (1 mmol/L) was used. IL-1ß and dimethyloxalylglycine increased HIF-1
to a similar degree but inhibition of the proteasomes allowed the detection of considerable amounts of OH-HIF-1
in IL-1ßtreated cells only (Fig. 3B). Thus, IL-1ß treatment did not inhibit proline hydroxylase activity like dimethyloxalylglycine. This finding is supported by unchanged HIF-1
degradation upon reoxygenation in the presence of IL-1ß (Fig. 3C). Cells were exposed to hypoxia (3%O2) for 4 hours followed by reoxygenation in 21% O2. Although IL-1ß treatment increased the absolute levels of HIF-1
protein under hypoxia, reoxygenation revealed no increased stability of HIF-1
in IL-1ßtreated cells (Fig. 3C).
To test whether IL-1ß increased the translation of HIF-1
mRNA, cycloheximide (10 µmol/L), an inhibitor of translation, was added 60 and 15 minutes before the end of 8-hour incubation with IL-1ß under normoxic conditions. HIF-1
protein accumulation was clearly reduced by cycloheximide, indicating that HIF-1
protein accumulation by IL-1ß is mainly the result of enhanced translation of HIF-1
mRNA (Fig. 3D). Collectively, IL-1ß treatment seemed to increase HIF-1
protein levels by increasing translation rather than by inhibiting proline hydroxylasedependent degradation.
EMSAs were done with nuclear extracts from OVCAR-3 cells to evaluate the DNA binding capacity of the IL-1ßinduced HIF-1
to a typical hypoxia response element. No HIF-1 DNA binding was observed under normoxic control conditions. After treatment with IL-1ß under normoxic conditions, the specific inducible HIF-1 complex was bound to DNA. Hypoxia (3 hours, 3% O2 and 1% O2) also stimulated binding of the HIF-1 complex, which was further enhanced by IL-1ß. The identity of HIF-1
as part of the inducible complex was confirmed by supershifting the complex with an antiHIF-1
antibody (Fig. 4).
|
in ADM gene expression. To clarify the role of HIF-1
in the IL-1ßinduced ADM expression under normoxic conditions, HIF-1
mRNA was reduced by transfecting HIF-1
siRNA into OVCAR-3 cells (Fig. 5A). After siRNA treatment, hypoxic incubation failed to induce the accumulation of HIF-1
protein in OVCAR-3 cells (Fig. 5B). Silencing of HIF-1
had no effect on the constitutive ADM expression but significantly reduced the IL-1ßinduced expression of ADM under normoxia (Fig. 5C). In contrast, HIF-1
siRNA completely abolished the hypoxic induction of ADM (Fig. 5D). Furthermore, the IL-1ßdependent increase of ADM expression under hypoxia was significantly reduced by HIF-1
siRNA treatment. Transfection of OVCAR-3 with siRNA directed against firefly luciferase had no effect on ADM expression under any incubation conditions (data not shown). Thus, HIF-1
seems to be critically involved in the IL-1ßinduced ADM expression. Interestingly, however, although hypoxic and HIF-1dependent expression was almost completely abolished by siRNA treatment, IL-1ß still induced ADM expression, indicating that other transcription factors could also be involved in this effect.
|
B in interleukin 1ßinduced hypoxia inducible factor 1 activation and adrenomedullin expression. Recently, the involvement of NF-
B in cytokine-induced HIF-1 activation was proposed (20). Therefore, we treated OVCAR-3 cells with the NF-
B inhibitor pyrrolidinium dithiocarbamate before incubation with IL-1ß. By EMSA we found NF-
B activation upon stimulation with IL-1ß, which was reduced with pyrrolidinium dithiocarbamate treatment (Fig. 6A). In contrast, however, HIF-1
protein accumulation as well as HIF-1 DNA binding was not lowered by pyrrolidinium dithiocarbamate (Fig. 6B). To analyze the effect of NF-
B on IL-1ßinduced ADM expression, OVCAR-3 cells were preincubated with pyrrolidinium dithiocarbamate before treatment with IL-1ß. Quantitation of ADM cDNA showed that pyrrolidinium dithiocarbamate treatment resulted in a reduction of IL-1ßinduced ADM mRNA levels (Fig. 6C). A complete inhibition of IL-1ßinduced ADM expression was achieved by the combined treatment with HIF-1
siRNA and pyrrolidinium dithiocarbamate (Fig. 6D).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In ovarian carcinoma, high ADM expression has been recognized as a negative prognostic factor for the patients' outcome although the factors and exact conditions involved in the regulation of ADM expression in these tumors are not well characterized (23). The role of HIF-1
in ADM expression was outlined by Garayoa et al. (10). They showed at least 20 putative HIF-1 binding sites spread over the promoter and enhancer DNA elements. Hypoxia and hypoxia mimetics like desferrioxamine or CoCl2 induced ADM expression in human breast cancer cells. High expression of HIF-1
and of the hypoxia inducible, HIF-1dependent VEGF was found by immunohistochemistry in epithelial ovarian carcinoma tissues (35). In that study, a significant correlation between HIF-1
, VEGF expression, and degree of malignancy of the tumors was reported. Similar observations were published by Hata et al. (23) with respect to ADM expression in ovarian carcinoma. Immunohistochemical staining revealed that the tumor cells themselves were the main source of ADM production.
We and others have previously reported that inflammatory cytokines induce HIF-1
accumulation and HIF-1 DNA binding in different cell types (17, 3638). Herein we report that IL-1ß induced the HIF-1dependent ADM gene in OVCAR-3 cells under normoxic conditions, comparable to its effect in astrocytes and arterial smooth muscle cells (39, 40). In addition, we found no significant amplification with the hypoxic induction of ADM mRNA.
Signaling of IL-1ß most likely occurs via membrane-bound IL-1 receptors leading to the activation of different MAPKs and the transcription factor NF-
B (41). In contrast, O2-dependent ADM expression is regulated by oxygen-dependent abundance of the
subunit of the HIF-1 complex. Under normoxic conditions, HIF-1
is hydroxylated at proline residues 402 and 564 by proline hydroxylases, recognized by pVHL, polyubiquitinated, and degraded by the proteasomes (14). Thus, we initially focused on the question whether IL-1ß treatment enables HIF-1
to escape from proteasomal degradation. Our data in Fig. 3 clearly show that proline hydroxylase activity was not affected by IL-1ß because the cytokine had no effect on the hydroxylation status of HIF-1
(Fig. 3B). Consequently, HIF-1
protein stability was not affected. Moreover, IL-1ß did not significantly induce HIF-1
mRNA but normoxic accumulation of HIF-1
protein by IL-1ß treatment was blocked by cycloheximide. Therefore, translation of HIF-1
mRNA seems to be significantly up-regulated by IL-1ß and overcomes the rate of normoxic degradation. This interpretation is supported by the fact that IL-1ß did not inhibit proteasomal degradation per se because the typical appearance of polyubiquitinated HIF-1
was lacking, which is observed on treatment with MG132 (compare lanes 2 and 4, Fig. 3B, middle). Moreover, in contrast to dimethyloxalylglycine, which inhibits proline hydroxylation by the proline hydroxylases, OH-HIF-1
was not reduced when proteasomal degradation was inhibited by MG132 (Fig. 3B, top, lane 6 versus lane 5). Collectively, IL-1ß seems to increase HIF-1
accumulation via enhanced translation of HIF-1
mRNA.
High efficiency of HIF-1
mRNA translation is ensured under hypoxic conditions by a formerly characterized internal ribosomal entry site in the 5' untranslated region of HIF-1
(42). Several growth factors have been found to increase translation of HIF-1
(43, 44) and we have reported that thyroid hormones stimulate HIF-1
protein synthesis in the human hepatoma cell line HepG2 (45). Recently, TNF
was found to increase HIF-1
by enhanced translation through the internal ribosomal entry site (46). Studies to uncover the signaling pathways involved in nonhypoxic HIF-1
activation revealed the involvement not only of MAPKs and PI3/Akt kinase in HIF-1
accumulation and transactivation (19, 47, 48) but also of NF-
B (49). We confirmed the activation of NF-
B in OVCAR-3 cells on stimulation with IL-1ß, but inhibition of NF-
B failed to reduce IL-1ßinduced HIF-1
accumulation and DNA binding. Therefore, a critical involvement of NF-
B as an upstream component of the IL-1ß signaling cascade leading to HIF-1
activation may be excluded in our cells. Functional integrity of NF-
B signaling was required for the increased translation of HIF-1
mRNA by TNF
(46) but, interestingly, herein OVCAR-3 cells neither responded to TNF
with increased HIF-1
accumulation nor enhanced expression of the HIF-1 target gene ADM.
Inhibition of NF-
B significantly reduced IL-1ßinduced ADM expression, which shows an important role for NF-
B in cytokine-induced ADM expression. In contrast, hypoxic induction was not affected by pyrrolidinium dithiocarbamate. We thus conclude that HIF-1 and NF-
B independently contribute to the expression of ADM. Neither inhibition of HIF-1 by siRNA nor of NF-
B by pyrrolidinium dithiocarbamate alone completely inhibited the IL-1ßinduced expression of the ADM gene. To abolish the IL-1ß effect, the combined reduction of HIF-1 and NF-
B activity was required.
Taking into consideration that the ADM gene and the surrounding regulating DNA segments contain many hypoxia response elements, our siRNA approach seemed to be very effective. We were able to significantly reduce the cooperative activation of ADM by hypoxia and IL-1ß, which is the result of an IL-1ßdependent increase in HIF-1
synthesis through enhanced translation and hypoxic stabilization. This results in an almost 350-fold stimulation of ADM expression when comparing normoxic untreated versus hypoxic IL-1ßtreated cells. Overexpression of HIF-1 was shown to induce a variety of factors that facilitate invasion of carcinoma cells, particularly of colon cancers (50). A similar situation may be found in ovarian tumors and contribute to spreading of the disease. HIF-1dependent expression of ADM in early phases of tumor development could be due to a combination of reduced degradation of its
subunit in focal areas of moderate hypoxia and increased HIF-1
translation by inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1ß, contributed by tumor-associated macrophages. No areas of severe hypoxia due to a fast growing and insufficiently perfused tumor mass are required to induce HIF-1 and HIF-1dependent genes if IL-1ß from macrophages is present. Increased ADM expression as a result of high HIF-1 levels could contribute to proliferation of tumor, invasion of tumor cells, and metastasis particularly in the early phase of tumor development.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
We thank Peter Ratcliffe (Oxford, United Kingdom) for generously providing the OH-HIF-1
anti-serum, and Eric Metzen (Lübeck, Germany) for kindly providing dimethyloxalylglycine.
Received 10/29/04. Revised 2/17/05. Accepted 3/27/05.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
stimulate DNA binding of hypoxia-inducible factor-1. Blood 1999;94:15617.
. Blood 2004;103:112430.
via an NF
B/COX-2 pathway identifies HIF-1 as a critical link between inflammation and oncogenesis. FASEB J 2003;17:21157.
is a molecular determinant of prolyl hydroxylation. FASEB J 2004;18:102830.
expression are increased in advanced stages of epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2003;91:5137.[CrossRef][Medline]
by insulin and interleukin-1ß involves the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway. FEBS Lett 2002;512:15762.[CrossRef][Medline]
mRNA contains an internal ribosome entry site that allows efficient translation during normoxia and hypoxia. Mol Biol Cell 2002;13:1792801.
and insulin-like growth factor 2. Cancer Res 1999;59:39158.
B, phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase, and mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling allows tumor necrosis factor
-evoked Bcl-2 expression to provoke internal ribosome entry site-dependent translation of hypoxia-inducible factor 1
. Cancer Res 2004;64:90418.
released from activated macrophages stabilize HIF-1
in resting tubular LLC-PK1 cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2003;284:C43946.
via an NF
B/COX-2 pathway identifies HIF-1 as a critical link between inflammation and oncogenesis. FASEB J 2003;17:21157.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Frede, C. Stockmann, S. Winning, P. Freitag, and J. Fandrey Hypoxia-Inducible Factor (HIF) 1{alpha} Accumulation and HIF Target Gene Expression Are Impaired after Induction of Endotoxin Tolerance J. Immunol., May 15, 2009; 182(10): 6470 - 6476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Berchner-Pfannschmidt, S. Frede, C. Wotzlaw, and J. Fandrey Imaging of the hypoxia-inducible factor pathway: insights into oxygen sensing Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2008; 32(1): 210 - 217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Gashaw, S. Stiller, C. Boing, R. Kimmig, and E. Winterhager Premenstrual Regulation of the Pro-Angiogenic Factor CYR61 in Human Endometrium Endocrinology, May 1, 2008; 149(5): 2261 - 2269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Chachami, A. Hatziefthimiou, P. Liakos, M. G. Ioannou, G. K. Koukoulis, S. Bonanou, P.-A. Molyvdas, G. Simos, and E. Paraskeva Exposure of differentiated airway smooth muscle cells to serum stimulates both induction of hypoxia-inducible factor-1{alpha} and airway responsiveness to ACh Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, October 1, 2007; 293(4): L913 - L922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Ribatti, M. T. Conconi, and G. G. Nussdorfer Nonclassic Endogenous Novel Regulators of Angiogenesis Pharmacol. Rev., June 1, 2007; 59(2): 185 - 205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. K. Martens, K. M. Kirschner, C. Warnecke, and H. Scholz Hypoxia-inducible Factor-1 (HIF-1) Is a Transcriptional Activator of the TrkB Neurotrophin Receptor Gene J. Biol. Chem., May 11, 2007; 282(19): 14379 - 14388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ramanathan, G. Pinhal-Enfield, I. Hao, and S. J. Leibovich Synergistic Up-Regulation of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Expression in Macrophages by Adenosine A2A Receptor Agonists and Endotoxin Involves Transcriptional Regulation via the Hypoxia Response Element in the VEGF Promoter Mol. Biol. Cell, January 1, 2007; 18(1): 14 - 23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A. Carroll, H. L. Kenerson, R. S. Yeung, and M. Lagunoff Latent Kaposi's Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus Infection of Endothelial Cells Activates Hypoxia-Induced Factors J. Virol., November 1, 2006; 80(21): 10802 - 10812. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. K. Lee, R. T.P. Poon, A. P. Yuen, K. Man, Z. F. Yang, X. Y. Guan, and S. T. Fan Rac Activation Is Associated with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Metastasis by Up-regulation of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Expression Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2006; 12(17): 5082 - 5089. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |