Cancer Research Cancer Research Funding Available Genetics and Biology of Brain Cancer
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Golas, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Boschelli, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Golas, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Boschelli, F.
[Cancer Research 65, 5358-5364, June 15, 2005]
© 2005 American Association for Cancer Research

Experimental Therapeutics, Molecular Targets, and Chemical Biology

SKI-606, a Src/Abl Inhibitor with In vivo Activity in Colon Tumor Xenograft Models

Jennifer M. Golas1, Judy Lucas1, Carlo Etienne1, Jonathan Golas1, Carolyn Discafani1, Latha Sridharan1, Erwin Boghaert1, Kim Arndt1, Fei Ye2, Diane H. Boschelli2, Fangbiao Li3, Craig Titsch3, Christine Huselton3, Inder Chaudhary3 and Frank Boschelli1

Departments of 1 Oncology, 2 Chemical and Screening Sciences, and 3 Drug Safety and Metabolism, Wyeth Research, Pearl River, New York

Requests for reprints: Frank Boschelli, Department of Oncology, Wyeth Research, 401 North Middletown Road, Pearl River, NY 10965. Phone: 845-602-5439; Fax: 845-602-5557; E-mail: boschef{at}wyeth.com.


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Src up-regulation is a common event in human cancers. In colorectal cancer, increased Src levels are an indicator of poor prognosis, and progression to metastatic disease is associated with substantial increases in Src activity. Therefore, we examined the activity of SKI-606, a potent inhibitor of Src and Abl kinases, against colon tumor lines in vitro and in s.c. tumor xenograft models. SKI-606 inhibited Src autophosphorylation with an IC50 of ~0.25 µmol/L in HT29 cells. Phosphorylation of Tyr925 of focal adhesion kinase, a Src substrate, was reduced by similar concentrations of inhibitor. Antiproliferative activity on plastic did not correlate with Src inhibition in either HT29 or Colo205 cells (IC50s, 1.5 and 2.5 µmol/L, respectively), although submicromolar concentrations of SKI-606 inhibited HT29 cell colony formation in soft agar. SKI-606 also caused loosely aggregated Colo205 spheroids to condense into compact spheroids. On oral administration to nude mice at the lowest efficacious dose, peak plasma concentrations of ~3 µmol/L, an oral bioavailability of 18%, and a t1/2 of 8.6 hours were observed. SKI-606 was orally active in s.c. colon tumor xenograft models and caused substantial reductions in Src autophosphorylation on Tyr418 in HT29 and Colo205 tumors. SKI-606 inhibited HT29 tumor growth on once daily administration, whereas twice daily administration was necessary to inhibit Colo205, HCT116, and DLD1 tumor growth. These results support development of SKI-606 as a therapeutic agent for treatment of colorectal cancer.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Epidemiologic evidence indicates that up-regulation of levels and activity of the nonreceptor protein tyrosine kinase c-Src is associated with colon tumor progression (1–3). Although modest increases in Src levels or activity occur early in tumor development, disease progression is accompanied by further increases in Src expression and activity, such that total Src activity in metastatic colorectal tumors can be as high as 90 times that found in normal mucosa (4, 5). Furthermore, increases in Src activity as small as 2.2-fold relative to normal mucosa are associated with poor prognosis in colorectal cancer patients (6). These observations suggest that Src is an attractive target for therapeutic intervention in colorectal cancer.

Src is implicated in other cancers besides those of colorectal origin, as it is overexpressed in the majority of breast and non–small cell lung cancers (1, 7). A more limited sampling of pancreatic and ovarian cancers indicate that Src activation is likely to be prevalent in these diseases as well (8–10). Numerous laboratory studies suggest that Src activation induces phenotypic traits associated with metastatic cells, such as increased cell motility, invasiveness, and survival (11–22). Additionally, antisense Src diminishes vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) up-regulation in HT29 cells incubated under hypoxic conditions, reduces vascularization in HT29 tumors, and inhibits growth of HT29 colon and SKOV-3 ovarian tumor xenografts (23–25). Host deficiency in either Src or the highly related family member Yes reduced tumor cell extravasation and metastatic burden in a lung metastasis model, with inhibition of vascular endothelial cell permeability a likely mechanism (26). Pharmacologic intervention with Src inhibitors against nude mouse s.c. tumors has not always been successful, but PP2, an inhibitor of Src family kinases, was effective in a liver metastatic HT29 tumor model (27–29). Concomitant administration of gemcitabine and PP2 or the Src inhibitor AZM475271 ablated growth of pancreatic tumor xenografts in orthotopic models, whereas other Src inhibitors caused significant inhibition of osteolytic bone metastases in a murine model (30–32). These findings are consistent with the epidemiologic evidence suggesting an increasing role for Src with increasing malignancy (see ref. 1 for a review).

In an earlier report, we described a selective Src inhibitor with in vivo activity against Src-transformed fibroblast xenografts (33). In that article, we reported that this compound, SKI-606, does not inhibit receptors for platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and is only weakly active against Her-2. SKI-606 was subsequently shown to be a potent Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitor that is orally active in a K562 chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) model (34). We also reported that SKI-606 inhibited growth of HT29 colon tumor xenografts in nude mice but that a narrow therapeutic window was observed (33). Others have reported that i.p. administration of SKI-606 inhibits tumor cell extravasation probably by blocking Src activation on stimulation of the VEGF receptor Flk-1 (26). In this report, we show an improved therapeutic window with oral administration, oral pharmacokinetic characterization, efficacy in additional xenograft models, and characterization of SKI-606 biochemical activity in tumor cells and tumor xenografts.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cell culture. HT29, Colo205, DLD1, and HCT116 cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD). Cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FCS, nonessential amino acids, glutamine, and gentamicin (50 µg/mL; all reagents from Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Cell proliferation was measured in a 96-well format. Cells were plated on day 1 (2,000 per well). On day 2, SKI-606 was added in a small volume from a stock in RPMI 1640 supplemented with FCS and DMSO such that the final concentration of DMSO did not exceed 0.1%. Cell-Glo reagent (Promega, Madison, WI) was added on day 5 to determine relative cell number.

Growth in soft agar was determined by plating 500 cells per well in a six-well dish in 3 mL medium with 0.4% agar (Invitrogen) as an overlay on a surface of in 0.8% agar with 4 mL medium. Compound was added to the top agar before pouring to give the desired concentration after complete equilibration with the bottom agar. Liquid medium (1 mL) containing compound at the desired final concentration was added the day after plating the top agar. The agar experiments were also done under conditions where compound was included in the bottom agar and top agar at the desired final concentration. Identical results were obtained with the two methods. The experiments reported here were done with HT29 cells from American Type Culture Collection after either three or four passages (obtained in 2003). Colony-forming assays were done by plating 200 or 500 cells per well in a six-well dish with compound present in the plating medium to mimic the conditions used in the soft agar colony formation experiments. After 5 days, colonies were stained with crystal violet and counted with the aid of a stereomicroscope. Determination of the proliferation of spheroids was described previously (35). Briefly, tumor cells (4 x 105) were suspended in 5 mL culture medium and seeded in a Petri dish or on a 0.5 mL underlayer of 0.66% agar. Spheroids were allowed to form over a 4-day period after which spheroids with a diameter of ~0.15 mm were selected and transferred to a 24-well dish containing a 0.5 mL underlayer of 0.66% agar overlayed with 1 mL culture medium. The two perpendicular diameters of each spheroid were measured at the time of replating and at the indicated intervals over a period of 6 days. The diameters were measured with the aid of a calibrated reticule mounted in the ocular of a stereoscope.

Antibodies. Monoclonal antibodies GD-11 to Src, 4G10 to phosphotyrosine, and rabbit polyclonal antibody to focal adhesion kinase (FAK) were purchased from Upstate Biotechnology (Lake Placid, NY). Antibodies to PY418 Src, PY397, PY925, and PY861 FAK were purchased from Biosource (Camarillo, CA). Antibody to actin was purchased from Chemicon (Temecula, CA). The total Src and PY418 Src ELISA kits were purchased from Biosource.

Biochemical analysis. Compound was diluted from a stock solution in DMSO directly into medium. The same volume of DMSO was added to medium in the mock-treated samples (final DMSO concentration did not exceed 0.1%). Cells were exposed to compound for 4 hours, unless otherwise indicated, and lysed with lithium dodecyl sulfate sample buffer (Invitrogen), radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer [20 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.5, room temperature), 0.1 mol/L NaCl, 1 mmol/L EDTA, 1% NP40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate], or urea lysis buffer [50 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.5, room temperature), 7 mol/L urea, 1 mmol/L EDTA, 0.1% SDS]. Samples were analyzed by gel electrophoresis and blotted to nitrocellulose or polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. Protein loading was adjusted by relative cell number or by protein determination, and equal loading was verified by probing blots with antibody to actin. Protein concentrations were determined with Bradford reagent, DC reagent (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), or BCA reagent (Pierce, Rockford, IL) either directly or after treatment with Compat-Able Protein assay kit (Pierce) with bovine IgG (Bio-Rad) as a standard. The Src and PY418 Src ELISA kits were purchased from Biosource and were used according to the manufacturer's specifications.

In vivo studies. All animal studies were conducted under an approved Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee protocol. Tumor cells were suspended to 50 million cells/mL and the cell suspension (0.2 mL) was injected s.c. into a flank of 6 to 7 weeks old female nude mice (Charles River, Wilmington, MA). Mice with tumors larger than 200 mm3 after 1 week were given vehicle or compound by oral gavage at the indicated doses in 0.2 mL vehicle containing 0.5% methylcellulose and 0.4% polysorbate 80 (Tween 80). Pharmacokinetic measurements were done with fed female nude mice given an oral gavage as above. Blood was drawn by cardiac puncture from euthanized animals. Samples were analyzed as described in Boschelli et al. (33).


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Effects of SKI-606 treatment on tumor cells in culture. SKI-606 inhibits anchorage-independent growth of rat fibroblasts transformed with activated Src with an IC50 of 100 nmol/L, with corresponding inhibition of Src-dependent phosphorylation of cellular proteins (33). In contrast, SKI-606 inhibited the proliferation of HT29 tumor cells on tissue culture plates with an IC50 of 1.5 µmol/L (n = 6), significantly above the IC50 for inhibiting growth of the Src fibroblasts in suspension (Fig. 1A). This value is lower than the 5 µmol/L value reported in our earlier article because of the lower cell densities used for the assays in this study.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Figure 1. Characterization of SKI-606 activity against HT29 cells in culture. A, HT29 cells were plated and treated with SKI-606 as described in Materials and Methods. Points, mean of six separate determinations. B, dose response of HT29 cell growth in soft agar. All visible colonies were counted regardless of size. Points, average of four determinations; bars, SD. C, effect of SKI-606 on colony formation under clonogenic conditions. HT29 cells were plated in the presence of the indicated concentration of SKI-606 as described in Materials and Methods. Colonies were stained with crystal violet and counted after 7 days. Points, average of four determinations; bars, SD. D, effect of SKI-606 on HT29 spheroid growth. Spheroids were collected as described in Materials and Methods and their size was determined on day 0. SKI-606 was added on day 0 and spheroid volume was measured on day 6. Ten spheroids were measured for each data point. Bars, SD.

 
We reported previously that SKI-606 inhibited HT29 cell colony formation in agar (33). A more quantitative analysis shown here (Fig. 1B) indicates that colony formation in agar was inhibited with an IC50 of 0.4 µmol/L. Because colony formation in soft agar was measured with cells plated in the presence of compound, it was possible that SKI-606 was inimical to the survival of single cells, whether growing in suspension or attached on plastic. To assess this possibility, we compared the plating efficiency of HT29 cells in the presence and absence of SKI-606 and found that treatment with compound reduced both the number of colonies and the colony size. The resultant IC50 for inhibiting colony formation (defined as a colony visible by eye) was ~1.5 µmol/L (Fig. 1C), roughly thrice higher than observed for growth in suspension and identical to the IC50 determined in the 96-well proliferation assays. These results suggest that attachment on plastic provided a modest survival benefit against SKI-606 treatment that is absent in cells growing in suspension in soft agar, consistent with the results of Windham et al., where other Src inhibitors caused increased apoptosis in HT29 cells forced to grow in suspension (19). We also examined whether cell-cell interactions provided any protection against exposure to SKI-606 by examining the effect of SKI-606 on spheroid growth of the American Type Culture Collection HT29 cells. As shown in Fig. 1D, SKI-606 inhibited spheroid growth with an IC50 of ~2.5 µmol/L. The decreased sensitivity of HT29 spheroid growth to SKI-606 treatment compared with the cells growing in agar suggests that cell-cell interactions protect against SKI-606 treatment.

We then studied the effect of SKI-606 on the proliferation of Colo205 cells, another colorectal tumor line, which expresses Src at approximately half the levels present in HT29 cells (7). As shown in Fig. 2A, SKI-606 reduced the proliferation of these cells on plastic (IC50, 2.5 µmol/L). The effect of SKI-606 on Colo205 cell growth in soft agar was not studied in detail because these cells degraded the agar matrix during the study (3-4 weeks). However, SKI-606 had a pronounced effect on the appearance of Colo205 spheroids (Fig. 2B). Before addition of compound, the Colo205 spheroids consisted of a loosely aggregated clump of cells in which individual cells could be readily distinguished (Fig. 2B, left). Within 4 hours of addition of SKI-606, this loose aggregate condensed into a dense ball with no discernible cell boundaries (Fig. 2B, middle). The spheroid maintained this appearance for the duration of the study. To determine the effect of a cytotoxic agent on the spheroid, the DNA-damaging agent calicheamicin was added. Calicheamicin reduced the total cell number and disrupted the spheroid (Fig. 2B, right). Spheroid size was significantly reduced by SKI-606 in a dose-dependent manner in a 6-day experiment (Fig. 2C), but note that spheroid size probably bears no direct relationship to the cell number. These observations suggest that SKI-606 strengthens cell-cell interactions in this line, a hypothesis consistent with the role of Src in regulating cell-cell adhesion (11, 13, 14, 29).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Figure 2. Effect of SKI-606 on Colo205 spheroids. A, spheroid size after 6-day exposure to different concentrations of SKI-606. B, photomicrographs of representative Colo205 spheroids after 3-day exposure to no compound (0.1% DMSO; left), SKI-606 (1.66 µmol/L; middle), or the cytotoxic agent calicheamicin (33.3 nmol/L; right). C, spheroid size at various times of exposure to no compound ({blacklozenge}) or 1.66 µmol/L (x), 3.33 µmol/L ({blacktriangleup}), and 5 µmol/L ({blacksquare}) SKI-606.

 
Inhibition of Src and Src target protein phosphorylation by SKI-606. To define the effect of SKI-606 treatment on Src activity in the HT29 and Colo205 tumor lines, we examined Src phosphorylation on Y418 and Src-dependent phosphorylation of the downstream Src substrate FAK. Phosphorylation of Y418 increases Src activity and is generally viewed as an autophosphorylation reaction, although another cellular kinase seems capable of phosphorylating this residue (36). In spite of this possible ambiguity, Y418 phosphorylation is certainly an indicator of Src activation. Therefore, we examined Src phosphorylation on Y418 in extracts of HT29 and Colo205 cells incubated with SKI-606 for 4 hours. We observed a similar dose-dependent decrease in phosphorylation of Y418 in the two colon tumor lines, where Y418 phosphorylation was nearly ablated by 1 µmol/L SKI-606 (Fig. 3A, top, HT29 cells, and bottom, Colo205 cells). A quantitative evaluation was done with the aid of a sandwich ELISA assay. In this assay, SKI-606 reduced Src phosphorylation on Y418 with an IC50 of ~250 nmol/L when measured in this manner, consistent with the immunoblot results (Fig. 3B).



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Figure 3. Inhibition of Src phosphorylation on Y418 by SKI-606 in HT29 and Colo205 extracts. A, immunoblots of lithium dodecyl sulfate–denatured extracts from HT29 (left) or Colo205 (right) cells treated with the indicated amounts of SKI-606 probed with antibodies to Src, PY418 Src, and actin. B, ELISA assay for PY418 Src levels (left) and total Src levels (right) in extracts of HT29 cells treated with the indicated amounts of SKI-606. C, inhibition of FAK phosphorylation on Y925 and Y861 in HT29. D, Colo205 extracts treated with the indicated amounts of SKI-606, but SKI-606 (1 µmol/L) does not affect phosphorylation of Y397 in FAK (C, bottom).

 
To examine inhibition of phosphorylation of downstream targets, we chose FAK in view of its central role in coordinating adhesion and growth factor signaling (37). FAK phosphorylated on its autophosphorylation site Y397 acts as a docking site for Src. Association of Src with Y397 activates Src, after which Src phosphorylates Y576, Y577, Y861, and Y925 in FAK (38–42). The effect of SKI-606 on phosphorylation of Y861 and Y925 in HT29 and Colo205 cells is shown in Fig. 3C and D. Y925 phosphorylation decreased following treatment with SKI-606 (IC50 ~200 nmol/L by densitometry) and was almost completely ablated by 1 µmol/L SKI-606 in both cell lines, whereas Y397 phosphorylation in the HT29 line was unaffected by 1 µmol/L SKI-606 (Fig. 3C, bottom). In contrast to Y925, significant phosphorylation of Y861 was observed in extracts from both cell lines after treatment with 1 µmol/L SKI-606 (Fig. 3C and D). Because Y397 phosphorylation was unaffected by 1 µmol/L SKI-606, reduced phosphorylation of FAK Y925 does not reflect inhibition of FAK itself but coincides with a reduction in Src activity.

Pharmacokinetic properties of orally given SKI-606. SKI-606 plasma levels in the nude mouse following i.p. administration were reported earlier (33). For development of SKI-606 as an orally given agent, pharmacokinetic studies were done to support the oral xenograft studies. As shown in Table 1, peak plasma concentrations of ~3 µmol/L were observed after administration of a 50 mg/kg dose of SKI-606. The trough plasma level of SKI-606 was ~90 nmol/L at this dose. The peak plasma level of SKI-606 was not significantly increased by oral administration of 150 mg/kg compound, whereas trough plasma levels increased to ~350 nmol/L. These results suggested that SKI-606 plasma levels attained with oral dosing were adequate to inhibit Src kinase activity in vivo. Further pharmacokinetic characterization indicated that SKI-606 had a bioavailability of 18% with a t1/2 of 8.6 hours and a large volume of distribution (18 L/kg).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 1. Plasma levels of SKI-606 after oral administration at 50 and 150 mg/kg

 
Inhibition of tumor growth by SKI-606. The ability of SKI-606 to inhibit the growth of HT29 and Colo205 s.c. xenograft tumors was examined. In HT29 xenograft studies, SKI-606 was given by oral gavage once daily to mice with tumors ranging from 200 to 300 mg. As shown in Fig. 4A, a dose-dependent antitumor response was observed in those mice given doses of 25 to 150 mg/kg over a 21-day period (P < 0.003 in Student's two-tailed t test in the group that received the 25 mg/kg/d). Although the once daily 25 mg/kg dose was not consistently active, the higher doses were reproducibly effective. No deaths occurred and no weight loss was observed in animals given SKI-606 at 150 mg/kg. The toxicity observed in our earlier studies may have been due to the use of a different vehicle in conjunction with twice daily dosing (33).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Figure 4. Orally administered SKI-606 inhibits the growth of s.c. colorectal tumor xenografts in nude mice. A, mice with s.c. HT29 tumors staged to 200 to 300 mg (10 animals per group) were given SKI-606 or vehicle orally once daily at the indicated doses. Animals were dosed for 21 days. Tumor size was measured at the indicated times and continued for 10 days after dosing was stopped. B, mice with s.c. Colo205 tumors were given SKI-606 ({blacksquare}) or vehicle ({blacklozenge}) twice daily at 75 mg/kg for 10 days with 10 animals per group. Points, mean; bars, SE (A and B). C, mice with s.c. HCT116 tumors staged to ~200 mg were given SKI-606 orally at 100 mg/kg b.i.d. for 21 days. Tumors were monitored for an additional week after dosing was stopped. D, mice with s.c. DLD1 tumors were treated with SKI-606 at 100 mg/kg b.i.d. for 21 days. Ten animals per group were monitored (C and D). P < 0.01.

 
In contrast to HT29 xenograft studies in which once daily administration of SKI-606 was efficacious, twice daily administration of SKI-606 was necessary to inhibit growth of Colo205 xenografts (Fig. 4B). Significant antitumor activity was observed with twice daily doses of 75 mg/kg for 10 days (doses spaced 12 hours apart). Increasing the dose had no additional benefit, whereas 50 mg/kg twice daily was inactive. The antitumor activity of the twice daily 75 mg/kg dose, although modest, was statistically significant (P < 0.003) and highly reproducible. Similar results were obtained with DLD1 and HCT116 xenografts when SKI-606 was given orally at 100 mg/kg twice daily for 21 consecutive days. In these experiments, the second dose was given 10 hours after the first dose of the day (Fig. 4C and D, respectively; Ps < 0.01 in both cases). No weight loss or compound-related animal deaths occurred in these studies.

Inhibition of Src phosphorylation in tumor xenografts. We next examined the effect of compound administration on Src activation in HT29 tumors in nude mice. An oral gavage of SKI-606 (150 mg/kg) on day 1 was given to the mice and tumors were excised 24 hours later. Two other groups were given a second 150 mg/kg dose on day 2 (at 24 hours after the first dose) and tumors were excised 3 and 6 hours after this second administration. Extracts from these tumors were analyzed for Src levels and for Src phosphorylation on Y418 by immunoblot and ELISA assay. As shown in the immunoblot of Fig. 5A, there was a significant decrease in Src phosphorylation (top band) at all time points. The additional bands migrating below Src that also disappear upon compound treatment may represent phosphorylated forms of other Src family kinases present in the mouse blood carried over with the tumor sample. We also examined Src phosphorylation on Y418 using the Biosource ELISA assay (Fig. 5B). Greater than 50% inhibition of Y418 phosphorylation were observed at 24 hours after the first dose, with a more complete reduction occurring at 3 and 6 hours after the second dose. Significant inhibition of Src autophosphorylation was also observed in the Colo205 xenografts (Fig. 5C). In this experiment, SKI-606 was given by oral gavage at 75 mg/kg b.i.d., and tumors were excised 24 hours after the first dose. These results are consistent with pharmacokinetic data shown in Table 1.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Figure 5. Src inhibition in HT29 and Colo205 tumors after treatment with SKI-606. S.c. HT29 tumors staged to ~100 mg were excised after treatment with vehicle or SKI-606 at 150 mg/kg by oral gavage. Compound was given at time 0 on day 1 and at 24 hours later. Tumors were excised from animals 24 hours after the initial dose and 3 and 6 hours after the second dose. A, RIPA buffer extracts prepared from tumors excised from vehicle and compound-treated animals were analyzed on immunoblots for levels of PY418 Src (top), Src (middle), and actin (bottom). B, ELISA assay of PY418 Src and total Src levels in HT29 tumor extracts. Left, reduction in PY418 Src by SKI-606 in animals treated 24 hours after the initial dose and 3 and 6 hours after the second dose. Right, total Src levels in the same extracts. Black columns, SKI-606 treated; white columns, vehicle treated. C, reduction of PY418 levels in Colo205 tumors in animals treated with SKI-606 (75 mg/kg b.i.d.) 24 hours after administration of the first dose. Black, SKI-606; white, vehicle.

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
SKI-606 is a potent Src kinase inhibitor that blocks Src autophosphorylation and the phosphorylation of downstream target proteins at submicromolar concentrations in all cells examined. Although the antiproliferative activity of SKI-606 does not directly correlate with inhibition of phosphorylation in the majority of tumor lines examined (>60 tumor lines),4 SKI-606 has significant antitumor activity against HT29 s.c. xenografts in nude mice at doses similar to those used in the K562 CML model described in Golas et al. (34). Src autophosphorylation was significantly reduced in HT29 and Colo205 tumor xenografts of SKI-606-treated animals under conditions where antitumor activity was observed.

SKI-606 inhibits Abl as well as Src family nonreceptor tyrosine kinases and is active in vivo against Src-transformed fibroblasts and K562 CML xenografts (33, 34, 43). Its activity against K562 tumors is likely due to inhibition of the tyrosine kinase activity of Bcr-Abl, although the ability of SKI-606 to inhibit Src family kinases may also be physiologically significant in this model. The Abl inhibitor imatinib has marginal activity against HT29 xenografts, an activity ascribed to the additional activity of imatinib against the receptor tyrosine kinase c-Kit (44). However, it is possible that Abl inhibition was also a factor in that study; therefore, the ability of SKI-606 to inhibit Abl might contribute to its in vivo activity against colon tumor xenografts. We note that SKI-606 does not possess pharmacologically significant activity against several other kinases, including PDGF receptor, FGF receptor, Her-2, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), IGF-I receptor, KDR (Flk-1), protein kinase A, protein kinase C, IKK, Cdk4, p38, and S6K (33).5

SKI-606 has less obvious effects on the tumor lines in this study than observed for EGFR or Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitors now in the clinic, where antiproliferative activity consistent with inhibition of biochemical activity of those kinases was reported (45–47). Other investigators failed to find any correlation between Src expression and response to their potent Src inhibitors in proliferation assays in culture or in vivo (28, 48). However, Src inhibitors besides SKI-606 block anchorage-independent growth of HT29 cells and those compounds were also less effective in blocking proliferation on plastic, perhaps reflecting increased Src activity in tumor cells kept in suspension (49, 50). Because SKI-606 reduces VEGF-mediated vascular permeability and tumor cell extravasation, the effect of Src inhibition on stromal cells, as well as on other tumor-host interactions, may be critical determinants for in vivo efficacy. It is perhaps significant that both epidemiologic and laboratory evidence suggests an important role for Src in metastatic cancer. SKI-606 activity in the s.c. xenografts presented here is modest compared with the striking results reported for PP2 in the metastasis model (29). Although work is in progress to define SKI-606 activity in this and other metastatic tumor models, the clinic remains the definitive test of the efficacy of this molecule.


   Acknowledgments
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

We thank Dr. Lewis Carroll Strauss for critical review of the article.


   Footnotes
 
Note: J.M. Golas and J. Lucas contributed equally to this work.

4 J.M. Golas and F. Boschelli, unpublished data. Back

5 F. Boschelli, unpublished data. Back

Received 7/14/04. Revised 4/ 6/05. Accepted 4/12/05.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Warmuth M, Damoiseaux R, Liu Y, Fabbro D, Gray N. SRC family kinases: potential targets for the treatment of human cancer and leukemia. Curr Pharm Des 2003;9:2043–59.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Frame MC. Src in cancer: deregulation and consequences for cell behaviour. Biochim Biophys Acta 2002;1602:114–30.[Medline]
  3. Summy JM, Gallick GE. Src family kinases in tumor progression and metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2003;22:337–58.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Talamonti MS, Roh MS, Curley SA, Gallick GE. Increase in activity and level of pp60c-src in progressive stages of human colorectal cancer. J Clin Invest 1993;91:53–60.
  5. Termuhlen PM, Curley SA, Talamonti MS, Saboorian MH, Gallick GE. Site-specific differences in pp60c-src activity in human colorectal metastases. J Surg Res 1993;54:293–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Aligayer H, Boyd DD, Heiss MM, et al. Activation of Src kinase in primary colorectal carcinoma: an indicator of poor clinical prognosis. Cancer 2002;94:344–51.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Budde RJ, Ke S, Levin VA. Activity of pp60c-src in 60 different cell lines derived from human tumors. Cancer Biochem Biophys 1994;14:171–5.[Medline]
  8. Hakam A, Fang Q, Karl R, Coppola D. Coexpression of IGF-1R and c-Src proteins in human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Dig Dis Sci 2003;48:1972–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Lutz MP, Esser IB, Flossmann-Kast BB, et al. Overexpression and activation of the tyrosine kinase Src in human pancreatic carcinoma. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1998;243:503–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Wiener JR, Windham TC, Estrella VC, et al. Activated SRC protein tyrosine kinase is overexpressed in late-stage human ovarian cancers. Gynecol Oncol 2003;88:73–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Owens DW, McLean GW, Wyke AW, et al. The catalytic activity of the Src family kinases is required to disrupt cadherin-dependent cell-cell contacts. Mol Biol Cell 2000;11:51–64.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Skoudy A, Llosas MD, Garcia de Herreros A. Intestinal HT-29 cells with dysfunction of E-cadherin show increased pp60src activity and tyrosine phosphorylation of p120-catenin. Biochem J 1996;317:279–84.
  13. Irby RB, Yeatman TJ. Increased Src activity disrupts cadherin/catenin-mediated homotypic adhesion in human colon cancer and transformed rodent cells. Cancer Res 2002;62:2669–74.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Avizienyte E, Wyke AW, Jones RJ, et al. Src-induced de-regulation of E-cadherin in colon cancer cells requires integrin signalling. Nat Cell Biol 2002;4:632–8.[Medline]
  15. Recchia I, Rucci N, Festuccia C, et al. Pyrrolopyrimidine c-Src inhibitors reduce growth, adhesion, motility and invasion of prostate cancer cells in vitro. Eur J Cancer 2003;39:1927–35.
  16. Hamaguchi M, Yamagata S, Thant AA, et al. Augmentation of metalloproteinase (gelatinase) activity secreted from Rous sarcoma virus-infected cells correlates with transforming activity of src. Oncogene 1995;10:1037–43.[Medline]
  17. Tanaka Y, Kobayashi H, Suzuki M, Kanayama N, Terao T. Transforming growth factor-ß1-dependent urokinase up-regulation and promotion of invasion are involved in Src-MAPK-dependent signaling in human ovarian cancer cells. J Biol Chem 2003;279:8567–76.
  18. Ito H, Gardner-Thorpe J, Zinner MJ, Ashley SW, Whang EE. Inhibition of tyrosine kinase Src suppresses pancreatic cancer invasiveness. Surgery 2003;134:221–6.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Windham TC, Parikh NU, Siwak DR, et al. Src activation regulates anoikis in human colon tumor cell lines. Oncogene 2002;21:7797–807.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Chou MT, Wang J, Fujita DJ. Src kinase becomes preferentially associated with the VEGFR, KDR/Flk-1, following VEGF stimulation of vascular endothelial cells. BMC Biochem 2002;3:32.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Eliceiri BP, Puente XS, Hood JD, et al. Src-mediated coupling of focal adhesion kinase to integrin {alpha}(v)ß5 in vascular endothelial growth factor signaling. J Cell Biol 2002;157:149–60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Abu-Ghazaleh R, Kabir J, Jia H, Lobo M, Zachary I. Src mediates stimulation by vascular endothelial growth factor of the phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase at tyrosine 861, and migration and anti-apoptosis in endothelial cells. Biochem J 2001;360:255–64.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Ellis LM, Staley CA, Liu W, et al. Down-regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor in a human colon carcinoma cell line transfected with an antisense expression vector specific for c-src. J Biol Chem 1998;273:1052–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Staley CA, Parikh NU, Gallick GE. Decreased tumorigenicity of a human colon adenocarcinoma cell line by an antisense expression vector specific for c-Src. Cell Growth Differ 1997;8:269–74.[Abstract]
  25. Wiener JR, Nakano K, Kruzelock RP, et al. Decreased Src tyrosine kinase activity inhibits malignant human ovarian cancer tumor growth in a nude mouse model. Clin Cancer Res 1999;5:2164–70.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Weis S, Cui J, Barnes L, Cheresh D. Endothelial barrier disruption by VEGF-mediated Src activity potentiates tumor cell extravasation and metastasis. J Cell Biol 2004;167:223–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Schroeder MC, Hamby JM, Connolly CJ, et al. Soluble 2-substituted aminopyrido2,3-dpyrimidin-7-yl ureas. Structure-activity relationships against selected tyrosine kinases and exploration of in vitro and in vivo anticancer activity. J Med Chem 2001;44:1915–26.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Klutchko SR, Hamby JM, Boschelli DH, et al. 2-Substituted aminopyrido2,3-dpyrimidin-7(8H)-ones. structure-activity relationships against selected tyrosine kinases and in vitro and in vivo anticancer activity. J Med Chem 1998;41:3276–2.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Nam JS, Ino Y, Sakamoto M, Hirohashi S. Src family kinase inhibitor PP2 restores the E-cadherin/catenin cell adhesion system in human cancer cells and reduces cancer metastasis. Clin Cancer Res 2002;8:2430–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Duxbury MS, Ito H, Zinner MJ, Ashley SW, Whang EE. Inhibition of SRC tyrosine kinase impairs inherent and acquired gemcitabine resistance in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:2307–18.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Yezhelyev MV, Koehl G, Guba M, et al. Inhibition of SRC tyrosine kinase as treatment for human pancreatic cancer growing orthotopically in nude mice. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:8028–36.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Shakespeare WC, Metcalf CA III, Wang Y, et al. Novel bone-targeted Src tyrosine kinase inhibitor drug discovery. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel 2003;6:729–41.[Medline]
  33. Boschelli DH, Ye F, Wang YD, et al. Optimization of 4-phenylamino-3-quinolinecarbonitriles as potent inhibitors of Src kinase activity. J Med Chem 2001;44:3965–77.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Golas JM, Arndt K, Etienne C, et al. SKI-606, a 4-anilino-3-quinolinecarbonitrile dual inhibitor of Src and Abl kinases, is a potent antiproliferative agent against chronic myelogenous leukemia cells in culture and causes regression of K562 xenografts in nude mice. Cancer Res 2003;63:375–81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Boghaert ER, Simpson J, Jacob RJ, et al. The effect of dibutyryl camp (dBcAMP) on morphological differentiation, growth and invasion in vitro of a hamster brain-tumor cell line: a comparative study of dBcAMP effects in 2- and 3-dimensional cultures. Int J Cancer 1991;47:610–8.[Medline]
  36. Chiang GG, Sefton BM. Phosphorylation of a Src kinase at the autophosphorylation site in the absence of Src kinase activity. J Biol Chem 2000;275:6055–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Parsons JT. Focal adhesion kinase: the first ten years. J Cell Sci 2003;116:1409–16.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Calalb MB, Zhang X, Polte TR, Hanks SK. Focal adhesion kinase tyrosine-861 is a major site of phosphorylation by Src. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1996;228:662–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Schlaepfer DD, Hunter T. Evidence for in vivo phosphorylation of the Grb2 SH2-domain binding site on focal adhesion kinase by Src-family protein-tyrosine kinases. Mol Cell Biol 1996;16:5623–33.[Abstract]
  40. Chen HC, Chan PC, Tang MJ, Cheng CH, Chang TJ. Tyrosine phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase stimulated by hepatocyte growth factor leads to mitogen-activated protein kinase activation. J Biol Chem 1998;273:25777–82.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Pengetnze Y, Steed M, Roby KF, Terranova PF, Taylor CC. Src tyrosine kinase promotes survival and resistance to chemotherapeutics in a mouse ovarian cancer cell line. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2003;309:377–83.[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Slack JK, Adams RB, Rovin JD, et al. Alterations in the focal adhesion kinase/Src signal transduction pathway correlate with increased migratory capacity of prostate carcinoma cells. Oncogene 2001;20:1152–63.[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Boschelli DH, Wang YD, Johnson S, et al. 7-Alkoxy-4-phenylamino-3-quinolinecarbonitriles as dual inhibitors of Src and Abl kinases. J Med Chem 2004;47:1599–601.[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Attoub S, Rivat C, Rodrigues S, et al. The c-kit tyrosine kinase inhibitor STI571 for colorectal cancer therapy. Cancer Res 2002;62:4879–83.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Ritter CA, Arteaga CL. The epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase: a promising therapeutic target in solid tumors. Semin Oncol 2003;30:3–11.[Medline]
  46. Sirotnak FM. Studies with ZD1839 in preclinical models. Semin Oncol 2003;30:12–20.[CrossRef]
  47. Druker BJ, Tamura S, Buchdunger E, et al. Effects of a selective inhibitor of the Abl tyrosine kinase on the growth of Bcr-Abl positive cells. Nat Med 1996;2:561–6.[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. Kraker AJ, Hartl BG, Amar AM, et al. Biochemical and cellular effects of c-Src kinase-selective pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidine tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Biochem Pharmacol 2000;60:885–98.[CrossRef][Medline]
  49. Laird AD, Li G, Moss KG, et al. Src family kinase activity is required for signal tranducer and activator of transcription 3 and focal adhesion kinase phosphorylation and vascular endothelial growth factor signaling in vivo and for anchorage-dependent and -independent growth of human tumor cells. Mol Cancer Ther 2003;2:461–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Wei L, Yang Y, Zhang X, Yu Q. Altered regulation of Src upon cell detachment protects human lung adenocarcinoma cells from anoikis. Oncogene 2004;23:9052–61.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
N.V. Rajeshkumar, A. C. Tan, E. De Oliveira, C. Womack, H. Wombwell, S. Morgan, M. V. Warren, J. Walker, T. P. Green, A. Jimeno, et al.
Antitumor Effects and Biomarkers of Activity of AZD0530, a Src Inhibitor, in Pancreatic Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2009; 15(12): 4138 - 4146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
W. A. Messersmith, N.V. Rajeshkumar, A. C. Tan, X. F. Wang, V. Diesl, S. E. Choe, M. Follettie, C. Coughlin, F. Boschelli, E. Garcia-Garcia, et al.
Efficacy and pharmacodynamic effects of bosutinib (SKI-606), a Src/Abl inhibitor, in freshly generated human pancreas cancer xenografts
Mol. Cancer Ther., June 1, 2009; 8(6): 1484 - 1493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CarcinogenesisHome page
B. Serrels, A. Serrels, S. M. Mason, C. Baldeschi, G. H. Ashton, M Canel, L. J. Mackintosh, B. Doyle, T. P. Green, M. C. Frame, et al.
A novel Src kinase inhibitor reduces tumour formation in a skin carcinogenesis model
Carcinogenesis, February 1, 2009; 30(2): 249 - 257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann OncolHome page
R. S. Finn
Targeting Src in breast cancer
Ann. Onc., August 1, 2008; 19(8): 1379 - 1386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
P. Koppikar, S.-H. Choi, A. M. Egloff, Q. Cai, S. Suzuki, M. Freilino, H. Nozawa, S. M. Thomas, W. E. Gooding, J. M. Siegfried, et al.
Combined Inhibition of c-Src and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Abrogates Growth and Invasion of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2008; 14(13): 4284 - 4291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
W. E. Sweeney Jr, R. O. von Vigier, P. Frost, and E. D. Avner
Src Inhibition Ameliorates Polycystic Kidney Disease
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2008; 19(7): 1331 - 1341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
A. Vultur, R. Buettner, C. Kowolik, W. Liang, D. Smith, F. Boschelli, and R. Jove
SKI-606 (bosutinib), a novel Src kinase inhibitor, suppresses migration and invasion of human breast cancer cells
Mol. Cancer Ther., May 1, 2008; 7(5): 1185 - 1194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Kopetz, A. N. Shah, and G. E. Gallick
Src Continues Aging: Current and Future Clinical Directions
Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2007; 13(24): 7232 - 7236.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Ann OncolHome page
K. Fizazi
The role of Src in prostate cancer
Ann. Onc., November 1, 2007; 18(11): 1765 - 1773.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Biomol ScreenHome page
S. N. Anderson, D. L. Towne, D. J. Burns, and U. Warrior
A High-Throughput Soft Agar Assay for Identification of Anticancer Compound
J Biomol Screen, October 1, 2007; 12(7): 938 - 945.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Endocr Relat CancerHome page
A. Di Florio, G. Capurso, M. Milione, F. Panzuto, R. Geremia, G. D. Fave, and C. Sette
Src family kinase activity regulates adhesion, spreading and migration of pancreatic endocrine tumour cells
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, March 1, 2007; 14(1): 111 - 124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BloodHome page
S. M. Weis, J. N. Lindquist, L. A. Barnes, K. M. Lutu-Fuga, J. Cui, M. R. Wood, and D. A. Cheresh
Cooperation between VEGF and {beta}3 integrin during cardiac vascular development
Blood, March 1, 2007; 109(5): 1962 - 1970.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
H. Jallal, M.-L. Valentino, G. Chen, F. Boschelli, S. Ali, and S. A. Rabbani
A Src/Abl Kinase Inhibitor, SKI-606, Blocks Breast Cancer Invasion, Growth, and Metastasis In vitro and In vivo
Cancer Res., February 15, 2007; 67(4): 1580 - 1588.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
M. Puttini, A. M. L. Coluccia, F. Boschelli, L. Cleris, E. Marchesi, A. Donella-Deana, S. Ahmed, S. Redaelli, R. Piazza, V. Magistroni, et al.
In vitro and In vivo Activity of SKI-606, a Novel Src-Abl Inhibitor, against Imatinib-Resistant Bcr-Abl+ Neoplastic Cells
Cancer Res., December 1, 2006; 66(23): 11314 - 11322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
A. Serrels, I. R.J. Macpherson, T.R. J. Evans, F. Y. Lee, E. A. Clark, O. J. Sansom, G. H. Ashton, M. C. Frame, and V. G. Brunton
Identification of potential biomarkers for measuring inhibition of Src kinase activity in colon cancer cells following treatment with dasatinib
Mol. Cancer Ther., December 1, 2006; 5(12): 3014 - 3022.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
D. Okutani, M. Lodyga, B. Han, and M. Liu
Src protein tyrosine kinase family and acute inflammatory responses
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, August 1, 2006; 291(2): L129 - L141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. S. Collins, J. Hong, L. Sapinoso, Y. Zhou, Z. Liu, K. Micklash, P. G. Schultz, and G. M. Hampton
A small interfering RNA screen for modulators of tumor cell motility identifies MAP4K4 as a promigratory kinase.
PNAS, March 7, 2006; 103(10): 3775 - 3780.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. M. Summy and G. E. Gallick
Treatment for Advanced Tumors: Src Reclaims Center Stage
Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2006; 12(5): 1398 - 1401.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
A. M. L. Coluccia, D. Benati, H. Dekhil, A. De Filippo, C. Lan, and C. Gambacorti-Passerini
SKI-606 Decreases Growth and Motility of Colorectal Cancer Cells by Preventing pp60(c-Src)-Dependent Tyrosine Phosphorylation of {beta}-Catenin and Its Nuclear Signaling
Cancer Res., February 15, 2006; 66(4): 2279 - 2286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Golas, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Boschelli, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Golas, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Boschelli, F.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online