| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Immunology |
Departments of 1 Immunology, 2 Medicine, 3 Pathology, and 4 Dermatology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; 5 University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and 6 Department of Molecular Therapeutics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
Requests for reprints: Walter J. Storkus, Department of Dermatology and Immunology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 1.32e Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute Research Pavilion, 5117 Centre Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213. Phone: 412-623-3240; Fax: 412-623-7704; E-mail: storkuswj{at}msx.upmc.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It has been previously shown that human dendritic cells, particularly after treatment with proinflammatory cytokines, are capable of mediating the in vitro apoptosis of tumor cells via a mechanism involving membrane-bound Fas ligand (FasL) or tumor necrosis factor (TNF)related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL; refs. 47). Recently, we reported that immature human dendritic cells are preferentially able to directly induce the apoptotic death of cancer cell lines and fresh tumor cells in vitro. This cytotoxicity was antagonized by inclusion of blocking antibodies or receptor-Fc constructs specific to TNF family ligands, showing that human immature dendritic cells mediate tumoricidal activity by simultaneous engagement of multiple transmembrane TNF family ligands, TNF, FasL, LT
1/ß2, and TRAIL (8, 9). In the current report, we have determined that spontaneously matured murine bone marrowderived dendritic cells (SM-DC) are superior to immature dendritic cells in mediating the apoptotic death of B and T lymphoma cells in vitro.
Because our current observations and previous reports (57) suggest that dendritic cellmediated killing of tumor cells in vitro was most evident at high dendritic cell-to-tumor cell ratios, which may not accurately reflect the physiologic situation where low frequencies of tumor-infiltrating dendritic cells are observed (10), we sought means by which tumor cells could be further sensitized to this lytic pathway to define a potentially translatable therapy for established cancers. In particular, we chose to sensitize tumor cells to dendritic cellmediated apoptosis by pharmacologically altering the balance of the antiapoptotic/proapoptotic protein expression in tumor cells using a nitric oxide (NO) donor compound PAPA-NO. This agent is capable of oxidizing and ablating the enzymatic activity of protein phosphatases that regulate the proteasome-dependent turnover of many cellular proteins (1114), including the proapoptotic/antiapoptotic proteins in the Bcl-2 and the inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) families, as well as the inhibitor
B (I
B; refs. 1518). In the present study, we report that NO induces the enhanced proteasome-dependent degradation of survivin in tumor cells, in association with the increased sensitivity of treated tumor cells to dendritic cellmediated apoptosis and uptake, leading to enhanced cross-presentation of tumor cellexpressed antigens to specific T cells in vitro.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Peptide. The OVA323-339 and control C. Falciparum (MCS326-345) I-Ad binding peptides were synthesized using 9-fluorenylmethoxycarboxyl chemistry by the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute's (UPCI) Peptide Synthesis Faculty. The peptides were >95% pure based on high-performance liquid chromatography, with identities validated by tandem mass spectrometric (MS/MS) analyses done by the UPCI Protein Sequencing Facility.
Generation of dendritic cells in vitro from bone marrow. Dendritic cells were generated as previously described (20). Briefly, bone marrow cells were cultured in CM supplemented with 1,000 units/mL recombinant murine granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor (mGM-CSF; Schering-Plough, Kenilworth, NJ) and 500 units/mL recombinant mIL-4 (Peprotech, Inc., Rocky Hill, NJ) at 37°C in a humidified, 5% CO2 incubator for 7 days (immature) or 9 days (mature). Dendritic cells were then purified using CD11c magnetic beads (MACS; Miltenyi Biotec., Auburn, CA) and subjected to the phenotypic and functional analyses described below. In some experiments, an additional metrizamide gradient centrifugation (20) was done before CD11c MACS isolation, resulting in purities exceeding 99%.
Experimental design of nitric oxide sensitization of tumor cells. Tumor cells were pretreated with the NO donor compound PAPA-NO (a generous gift from Dr. Lawrence Keefer, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD). After a 1-hour incubation, the media were removed and cells maintained in fresh media for additional 18 hours at 37°C. The cells were then harvested and used as targets in cytotoxicity assays or lysed for Western blot analyses.
Flow cytometry. All the flow cytometric analyses were done using a Coulter Epics XL (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA) flow cytometer. The phenotypic analyses of dendritic cells and cell surface expression of Fas or FasL were done as described previously (8, 21).
To evaluate the cytotoxicity of dendritic cells against tumor cells, dendritic cells were cocultured with tumor cells for 4 hours at an effector/target (E/T) ratio of 5:1 at 37°C. The cells were then harvested and stained on ice for 30 minutes with PE-conjugated anti-mouse B220 monoclonal antibody (mAb, BD PharMingen, San Jose, CA, for A20) or anti-mouse H-2Kd mAb (BD PharMingen, for EG7) to distinguish tumor cell populations from dendritic cells, and FITC-conjugated pan-caspase inhibitor z-VAD-FMK (VAD-FMK; Promega, Madison, WI) as an early apoptosis marker. Results are reported based on the percentage of cytotoxicity calculated as the number of apoptotic tumor cells divided by total number of tumor cells gated.
To evaluate antigen uptake, untreated or PAPA-NO-treated tumor cells were stained with Hoechst 33342 (Molecular Probes, Carlsbad, CA) for 30 minutes before coculture with dendritic cells for 18 hours at a dendritic cell/tumor ratio of 5:1. Uptake of Hoechst-positive tumor cells by dendritic cells was then analyzed using a MoFlo cytometer (Cytomation, Fort Collins, CO).
3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assays. To assess the apoptotic sensitivity of A20 cells to agonist anti-mouse Fas mAb (Jo2; BD PharMingen), A20 cells were cultured in the presence or absence of the antibody at the indicated concentrations for 24 hours. 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assays were then done, as described previously (8).
In vitro antigen cross-presentation assays. EG7 and EL4 cells were pretreated with PAPA-NO before coculture with dendritic cells for 24, 36, or 48 hours at a dendritic cell/tumor ratio of 5:1. DO11.10 T hybridoma cells were then added to wells at a T/dendritic cell ratio of 1:1. After 18 hours, the supernatants were harvested and interleukin 2 (IL-2) production was quantitated by specific ELISA (Endogen, Woburn, MA). IL-2 secretion by hybridoma cells stimulated with dendritic cells pulsed with 400 ng/mL of the OVA323-339 synthetic peptide served as a positive control in these experiments.
Western blot analyses. A20 cells were treated with PAPA-NO before lysed and subjected to Western blot analysis as described previously (22). Mouse anti-ß-actin antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, MA) was used as a loading control. Densitometric quantitations were done using a White/UV Transilluminator (UVP Products, Upland, CA) and analyses done using Labworks software (UVP Products).
Statistical analyses. Statistical differences between groups were evaluated using a two-tailed Student's t test with statistical significance defined as P < 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
To provide further support for the role of the Fas-FasL pathway in dendritic cellmediated tumoricidal activity, we analyzed A20 tumor cells for their level of expression of membrane-bound Fas by flow cytometry. We detected uniform, high levels of Fas expression on the surface of A20 cells (Fig. 2A). However, because expression of Fas is necessary but not sufficient for cells to undergo Fas-mediated apoptosis (23), we also determined whether ligation of Fas could trigger A20 cells to become apoptotic (in 24-hour MTT assays) after addition of various concentrations of agonist anti-Fas antibody (Jo2) to cultures. As shown in Fig. 2B, the anti-Fas antibody induced A20 cell death in a dose-dependent manner, whereas the isotype-matched control antibody had little effect on A20 viability. Similarly, nearly 30% of A20 cells became apoptotic after a 4-hour coincubation with L5178Y.FasL cells but not control L5178Y cells (Fig. 2C). These data show that A20 tumor cells were sensitive to the apoptosis mediated through FasL-Fas pathway induced by antibody agonist, FasL+ transfected cell lines or FasL+ dendritic cells.
|
3-fold less tumor cell killing capacity (Fig. 2D). These data indicate that FasL plays a dominant role in dendritic cellmediated tumor apoptosis and that Fas-independent pathway(s) may also partially contribute to this killing activity. Pretreatment of A20 tumor cells with a nitric oxide donor increases their sensitivity to dendritic cellmediated, Fas-dependent apoptosis. Because A20 cells were moderately sensitive to Fas-dependent killing mediated by dendritic cells, we next sought to determine whether tumor cells could become conditionally sensitized to such killing using pharmacologic agents. In particular, we chose to attempt to alter the balance of antiapoptotic/proapoptotic protein expression in tumor cells by either up-regulating the expression of proapoptotic proteins or down-regulating antiapoptotic proteins, or both, to theoretically make the cells more susceptible to dendritic cellmediated apoptosis. We attempted to modulate this balance by affecting the functional activity of protein phosphatases that regulate the levels of proapoptotic/antiapoptotic protein expression based on their state of phosphorylation, making them targets for E3 ligases and consequently, the proteasome (24). Because NO is known to oxidize critical cysteine residues within protein phosphatase catalytic sites, we pretreated A20 cells with the NO donor compound PAPA-NO for 1 hour and maintained the cells in fresh media for an additional 18 hours. The cells were then stained with FITC-conjugated pan-caspase inhibitor z-VAD-FMK to determine the level of cellular apoptosis. As shown in Fig. 3A, as a single agent, PAPA-NO induced apoptosis in A20 cells in a dose-dependent manner. More importantly, at low concentrations (i.e., <100 µg/mL), PAPA-NO was nontoxic and did not promote significant A20 apoptosis by itself. However, the NO-conditioned tumor cells seemed to become sensitized to apoptosis mediated by anti-Fas agonist antibody (Fig. 3B) or L5178Y.FasL cells (Fig. 3C).
|
0.05). Similar results were also obtained using SM-DCs as effector cells (Fig. 4B). Given minor concerns that the small contaminant CD11c-negative cell populations might be at least partially responsible for mediating tumor cell apoptosis, we did an additional density gradient centrifugation step using metrizamide before CD11c MACS bead selection. This resulted in CD11c+ dendritic cell purities exceeding 99%, with no significant change in tumoricidal function mediated by these effector cells (data not shown).
|
Sensitization of A20 cells to dendritic cellmediated apoptosis by nitric oxide involves both Fas-dependent and Fas-independent pathways. Because dendritic cell killing of A20 cells seemed at least partially mediated through a Fas-dependent pathway, we initially hypothesized that this would also be the case for NO-treated tumor cells. Indeed, the capacity of dendritic cells generated from FasL-deficient mice to kill NO-treated A20 cells was greatly impaired when compared with dendritic cells derived from wild type mice (Fig. 5A). These results suggest that the Fas/FasL-mediated pathway contributes partially to the observed tumoricidal activity associated with dendritic cells. At the same time, these data also suggest that FasL-independent pathway(s) are also significantly involved in dendritic cellmediated killing of A20 tumor cells. The most likely potential candidates would be other TNF family members, such as TNF
and TRAIL, based on our previous results published for human dendritic cells (9).
|
or TRAIL, before addition to NO-pretreated A20 tumor cell cultures. As shown in Fig. 5B, disruption of either TNF/TNF-R or TRAIL/TRAIL-R interactions served to further (partially) inhibit dendritic cellmediated killing of NO-treated A20 cells. In this setting, anti-TNF
antibody seemed less effective than anti-TRAIL antibodies in blocking the residual killing mediated by FasL-deficient dendritic cells. Indeed, because the simultaneous disruption of all three ligand/receptor (FasL/Fas, TNF/TNF-R, and TRAIL/TRAIL-R) pairs seemed to inhibit dendritic cellmediated killing of NO-treated A20 cells to a degree comparable with that noted for dendritic cells whose FasL and TRAIL interactions were simultaneously disrupted, TNF
likely plays a very minor role in this model of apoptosis. Therefore, these data suggest that pretreatment of A20 with NO donors sensitizes these target cells not only to FasL-induced apoptosis but also to (at least) TRAIL-mediated apoptosis. However, the minor but detectable level of apoptosis observed under conditions in which the Fas, TNF, and TRAIL pathways were coordinately blocked may suggest the further minor participation of additional molecule(s) in dendritic cell tumoricidal activity.
Treatment of tumor cells with nitric oxide donors preferentially accelerates survivin degradation through a proteasome-dependent pathway in association with enhanced sensitivity to dendritic cell. To further investigate the mechanism(s) by which NO donors sensitize A20 tumor cells to dendritic cellmediated killing, we analyzed the NO-treated tumor cells for alterations in their expression of proapoptotic and antiapoptotic proteins. One of the most well known protein families that regulate cell survival and apoptosis is the Bcl-2 family, in particular, Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL (25). The protective function of these proteins is, in great part, due to the formation of inactivating heterodimers with the proapoptotic protein Bax. An imbalance among these proteins, in favor of the proapoptotic activities, might sensitize tumor cells to apoptosis. However, we did not observe any differences in the normalized (versus ß-actin) expression levels of the Bcl-2, Bcl-XL, or Bax proteins within 18 hours of NO treatment (Fig. 6A). In contrast, we noted that expression of another antiapoptotic protein, survivin, which belongs to the IAP family, was markedly down-regulated in an NO donor dose-dependent manner (Fig. 6A).
|
Pretreatment of tumor cells with nitric oxide donor results in increased dendritic cell uptake and cross-presentation of tumor antigen to specific T cells. We further hypothesized that increased ability of dendritic cell to mediate the apoptotic death of NO-treated tumor cells might lead to a more efficient protocol for apoptotic body uptake and consequent cross-presentation of tumor antigens in vitro. To properly evaluate uptake of apoptotic body by dendritic cells using a flow cytometrybased analysis, we chose to prelabel tumor cells for 30 minutes with the cell-permeable, UV-fluorescent nucleic acid dye Hoechst 33342. After staining with Hoechst 33342, tumor cells were washed and cultured in media for an additional 3 hours to allow for any unbound dye to diffuse from the cells. To validate that the staining procedure did not promote tumor cell apoptosis directly, labeled tumor cells were cultured overnight and stained with propidium iodide (PI) to evaluate viability. At a final concentration of 4 µg/mL Hoechst 33342, 100% of tumor cells were stained and this signal was maintained for at least 24 hours, without any alteration in cell viability. Moreover, labeling was stable because the supernatant harvested from labeled cells was not able to consequently label fresh tumor cells (data not shown).
To evaluate apoptotic body uptake by dendritic cells, we treated tumor cells with PAPA-NO, stained them with Hoechst 33342 before addition of dendritic cells, and 24 hours later, harvested these cultures for flow cytometric analyses. Cells were counterstained with anti-mouse B220 mAb (to distinguish A20 cells from dendritic cell) and PI. Viable dendritic cells (PIB220) were gated and analyzed for uptake of Hoechst 33342+ apoptotic bodies. As shown in Fig. 7A, dendritic cells cocultured with NO-treated A20 cells exhibited much higher MFI than those cultured with untreated tumor cells. This suggests that more apoptotic tumor cells were taken up by dendritic cells per unit time if the tumor cells were pretreated with the NO donor compound.
|
To access cross-presentation of tumor antigens to T cells, H-2b EG7 (OVA+) or EL4 (OVA) tumor cells were pretreated with PAPA-NO, before addition of H-2d dendritic cells to culture. To allow for optimal antigen uptake, processing, and presentation, we coincubated the dendritic cell tumor mix for 24 to 48 hours, before addition of I-Ad-restricted DO11.10 T hybridoma cells. IL-2 production by the hybridoma cells was used as an indicator for T-cell activation. As shown in Fig. 7D, T cells stimulated with dendritic cells loaded with synthetic OVA323-339 peptide produced high levels of IL-2, whereas no response was detected for dendritic cells pulsed with the control MCS peptide. Similarly, minimal IL-2 was produced when these T cells were cultured with dendritic cells and EL4 (OVA) tumor cells. On the contrary, when the EG7 (OVA+) tumor cells were pretreated with 10 or 25 µg/mL of PAPA-NO, IL-2 production from responder T cells was elevated to a level comparable with that of the dendritic cell + OVA323-339 peptide cohort and this level of production was significantly greater than that observed for T cells + dendritic cell + untreated EG7 cells (with maximal effects observed after 36-48 hours processing periods). To further exclude the possibility of dendritic cell uptake of soluble OVA protein elaborated from EG7 cells, we also established transwell cultures in parallel in which untreated or treated EG7 were added to upper wells, whereas dendritic cells and T cells were loaded into the bottom wells. Under these conditions, IL-2 was not detected in cultures at any time point evaluated (data not shown), indicating that the activation of T cells in Fig. 7D was primarily due to the direct cross-presentation of OVA peptide by H-2d dendritic cell uptake of apoptotic body, which is accentuated by tumor cell pretreatment with the NO donor compound.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous reports have shown that FasL may be used by murine dendritic cells to kill susceptible target cells, such as T cells (4, 26). Here, we report that multiple TNF family ligands, FasL and TRAIL (and possibly TNF
), participate in dendritic cell tumoricidal activity. Among the molecules that are involved, FasL clearly played a dominant role, because FasL-deficient dendritic cells were reduced over 65% in their killing capacity. Approximately 85% of the dendritic cellmediated cytotoxicity was ablated when all three ligand/receptor (i.e., FasL, TRAIL, and TNF
) pairs were simultaneously disrupted. However, a low but detectable level of residual tumor cell apoptosis still remained under such conditions, suggesting the minor involvement of an as yet undefined molecule(s). Whereas we were unable to assess its importance in the current study, one obvious candidate in this regard is lymphotoxin-
/ß, which belongs to the same TNF ligand superfamily and has been reported to be used by human dendritic cells to kill tumor cell lines in vitro (9).
Fas-induced apoptosis of B cells has been extensively evaluated in the past (27). Naive murine B cells express low levels of Fas, but upon activation, expression of Fas is markedly up-regulated (23). Notably, this is not sufficient to enhance B-cell sensitivity to Fas-induced apoptosis. Engagement of B-cell receptor or expression of antiapoptotic proteins may induce resistance to Fas-mediated B-cell death (27). Expression of p53 may also be required for B cells to undergo apoptosis. Cross-linking CD40 induces normal B cells to proliferate and differentiate but causes many tumor cell lines to undergo apoptosis. Murine B lymphoma lines that contain mutated p53, such as A20 cells, are induced to undergo apoptosis upon CD40 cross-linking, whereas other lines that express wild-type p53 are comparatively resistant (28). In this context, it is perhaps not surprising that we observed that murine bone marrowderived dendritic cells were selectively cytotoxic against A20 B lymphoma cells and were nontoxic to normal naive B cells or LPS-activated B cells (either not treated or pretreated with NO donor compounds). This provides translational support that adoptively transferred dendritic cells may selectively kill B lymphoma cells without damaging their normal counterparts in vivo.
Several groups have also shown that treatment of tumor cells with ionizing radiation, chemotherapeutic, or other pharmacologic agents can sensitize them to TNF family ligandinduced apoptosis (2932). Our findings extend this work by suggesting that the pretreatment of tumor cells with a source of NO markedly increases their apoptotic sensitivity to dendritic cells that express (at least) three TNF family ligands including FasL, TRAIL, and TNF
. Because these molecules are coordinately used by CTLs (33, 34) and NK cells (21) to kill tumor cells, the in vivo treatment of tumor lesions with locoregional NO would be anticipated to sensitize tumor cells to not only dendritic cell but also to specific CTL- and NK-mediated apoptosis, particularly under proinflammatory, delayed-type hypersensitivity-type conditions.
The mechanism by which NO sensitizes tumor cells to dendritic cellmediated killing was also investigated. Among the antiapoptotic/proapoptotic proteins analyzed, survivin was found to be uniquely down-regulated after NO treatment. Survivin is a recently identified antiapoptotic protein that is aberrantly expressed in cancer cells but is not expressed by normal, differentiated adult tissues (35). Consistent with the homeostatic turnover/degradation of survivin being regulated by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway (22), we observed that the proteasome inhibitor lactacystin blocked survivin degradation in NO-treated A20 cells. Based on our current data and previous reports (36, 37), we hypothesize that the mechanism of NO-induced survivin degradation and tumor sensitization involves the following pathway: (a) treatment of tumor cells with an NO donor compound rapidly inhibits the function of protein phosphatase (b) thus leading to the sustained activation of protein kinases, such as p34(cdc2)-cyclin B1, that are capable of phosphorylating survivin (36); (c) enhanced phosphorylation of survivin facilitates its ubiquitination and (d) its consequent proteasome-dependent degradation. As a result of altering the balance between antiapoptotic and proapoptotic proteins towards a more proapoptotic phenotype, the death signals delivered by dendritic cells, under such sensitized conditions, are enhanced. From an immunotherapeutic point of view, NO-facilitated survivin degradation also provides an experimental basis for the design of new combinational therapy strategies in which a "sensitizing agent" and autologous dendritic cells could be sequentially injected intratumorally. This would promote tumor cell death in an immunologically important manner yielding enhanced dendritic cellmediated cross-priming of specific T cells in vivo as supported in principle by the results of in vitro experiments reported in Fig. 7.
Previous reports suggested the NO has a dichotomous nature. Instead of enhancing apoptosis, some groups showed that NO could inhibit apoptosis induced by different stimuli (3841). These differences in behavior may be explained by the chemistry of NO. After the treatment of NO donor, released NO is thought to either react directly with radicals, or form intermediates that can facilitate nitrosylation reaction (42). Because various NO donors may induce either direct or indirect effects, this could yield different end effects on treated cells. For instance, it has been reported that pretreatment of lung fibroblast cells with PAPA-NO and DEA-NO enhanced tumor sensitivity to cisplatin-mediated death, whereas other NO donors failed to do so (43). Hence, these distinct effects may be ultimately useful in defining clinical strategies for the use of NO donor compounds in cancer patients.
Because survivin is a shared tumor-associated antigen that is differentially expressed in a variety of malignancies and can be recognized by specific CTLs (44), it is also possible that proteasome-derived survivin peptides could be expressed at higher stochastic levels on NO-treated tumor cells, making them better targets for specific T-cell clearance. We are currently evaluating the ability of survivin peptide-specific CTLs to differentially recognize control versus NO-treated tumor cells in vitro.
Somewhat in contrast to our previous studies of human dendritic cells (8, 9), phenotypically mature murine dendritic cells (i.e., SM-DCs) rather than immature murine dendritic cells mediated superior levels of tumor cell killing. Because the lytic capacity of SM-DCs seemed comparable with that of LPS-matured dendritic cells (data not shown), the manner in which dendritic cells become "mature" may not profoundly influence this functional aspect of these APCs.
Of translational importance, SM-DCs and immature dendritic cells seemed equally capable of engulfing apoptotic tumor bodies after first mediating their demise (data not shown). In addition, our data has shown that sensitization of tumor cells to dendritic cellmediated killing by NO donor treatment also leads to enhanced apoptotic body uptake and cross-presentation of tumor-associated antigens to tumor-specific T cells. This provides confidence that the adoptive transfer of SM-DCs ± NO intratumorally may lead to improved cross-presentation of tumor-derived epitopes to T cells in vivo. The coapplication of NO in situ may also affect dendritic cell function however, as suggested by an equivocal literature. Hence, although one group has showed that glioma induces apoptosis in dendritic cells via inducible NO synthase (45), others have presented contradictory data that NO-treated dendritic cells not only reduced the growth of the highly tumorigenic and poorly immunogenic B16 melanoma but also caused tumor regression and improved animal survival (46). Clearly, the direct testing of such combinational therapies in murine tumor models warrants further evaluation.
In summary, our study shows that murine dendritic cells mediate tumor cell apoptosis and that such lysis may be increased by tumor cell pretreatment with NO-elaborating agents in association with the depletion of tumor cell survivin protein levels. These findings provide a better understanding of important connections between the innate and adaptive immune effector functions of dendritic cells and provide support for the development and preclinical testing of combinational immunotherapy approaches integrating tumor cell apoptosis sensitization regimen(s) and intratumoral dendritic cell administration.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
We thank Drs. William Chambers and Amy Wesa for their careful review and critique of this article during its preparation, Dr. Hideho Okada for his generosity in providing the mFasL-transfected L5178Y and control L5178Y cell lines, Dr. Louis Falo for providing the EL4 and EG7 cell lines and the DO11.10 T cell hybridoma, Dr. Per Basse (Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA) for providing Hoechst 33342 nucleic acid dye, and Dr. Lawrence Keefer for providing the NO donor compound PAPA-NO.
Received 2/24/05. Revised 6/16/05. Accepted 7/ 1/05.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-related apoptosis-inducing ligand in the enhanced cytotoxicity of IFN-ß-stimulated human dendritic cells to tumor cells. J Immunol 2001;166:540715.
(1) ß (2), Fas ligand, and TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand. J Immunol 2002;168:18319.
B
proteolysis by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Biochimie 2001;83:3516.[Medline]
on APO2L/TRAIL expression and -mediated cytotoxicity. J Immunol 2002;169:80917.
-induced apoptosis by reducing the generation of ceramide. PNAS 2000;97:54805.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. A. Smyth, N. Harker, W. Turnbull, H. El-Doueik, L. Klavinskis, D. Kioussis, G. Lombardi, and R. Lechler The Relative Efficiency of Acquisition of MHC:Peptide Complexes and Cross-Presentation Depends on Dendritic Cell Type J. Immunol., September 1, 2008; 181(5): 3212 - 3220. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Chauvin and R. Josien Dendritic Cells as Killers: Mechanistic Aspects and Potential Roles J. Immunol., July 1, 2008; 181(1): 11 - 16. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Wei, H. Wang, B. Lu, B. Li, S. Hou, W. Qian, K. Fan, J. Dai, J. Zhao, and Y. Guo Cancer Immunotherapy Using In vitro Genetically Modified Targeted Dendritic Cells Cancer Res., May 15, 2008; 68(10): 3854 - 3862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Papewalis, B. Jacobs, M. Wuttke, E. Ullrich, T. Baehring, R. Fenk, H. S. Willenberg, S. Schinner, M. Cohnen, J. Seissler, et al. IFN-{alpha} Skews Monocytes into CD56+-Expressing Dendritic Cells with Potent Functional Activities In Vitro and In Vivo J. Immunol., February 1, 2008; 180(3): 1462 - 1470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Srivastava, Ch. Varalakshmi, and A. Khar Cross-linking a mAb to NKR-P2/NKG2D on dendritic cells induces their activation and maturation leading to enhanced anti-tumor immune response Int. Immunol., May 1, 2007; 19(5): 591 - 607. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Berhanu, J. Huang, S. M. Alber, S. C. Watkins, and W. J. Storkus Combinational FLt3 Ligand and Granulocyte Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Treatment Promotes Enhanced Tumor Infiltration by Dendritic Cells and Antitumor CD8+ T-Cell Cross-priming but Is Ineffective as a Therapy. Cancer Res., May 1, 2006; 66(9): 4895 - 4903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |