| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Molecular Biology, Pathobiology and Genetics |
Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California
Requests for reprints: Guowei Fang, Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, 337 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5020. Phone: 650-725-2762; Fax: 650-724-9945; E-mail: gwfang{at}stanford.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C), a multisubunit E3 ubiquitin ligase essential for mitotic progression, was originally identified as a ubiquitin ligase for cyclin B (25). Subsequent studies showed that APC/C is not only active at anaphase to degrade cyclin B, but its activity persists until the end of G1 (68), targeting a large group of cell cycle regulators for degradation. Activation of APC/C in the cell cycle is attributed to mitosis-specific phosphorylation of APC/C subunits (9, 10) and to the binding of Fizzy family proteins, Cdc20 and Cdh1 (7, 11). Genetic and biochemical studies indicate that Cdc20 and Cdh1 are essential regulators of APC/C activity; they directly bind to and activate APC/C. In the cell cycle, Cdc20 activates APC/C at the onset of anaphase to trigger chromosome separation, whereas Cdh1 replaces Cdc20 at late anaphase and Cdh1 remains associated with APC/C until late G1.
APC/C controls mitosis and G1 by targeting different substrates for destruction at different cell cycle stages. Examples of APC/C substrates include securin, Cdc20, Aurora A, Plk1, and geminin (2). APC/C recognizes either a KEN-box (K-E-N) or a destruction box (D-box; R-x-x-L, x = any amino acid) in substrates. D-boxcontaining substrates are recognized by either APC/C-Cdc20 or APC/C-Cdh1, whereas KEN boxcontaining substrates are only ubiquitinated by APC/C-Cdh1 (1218). In addition, a unique sequence in Aurora A, termed the A-box (RxLxPSN), is also required for its efficient ubiquitination by APC/C-Cdh1 (19, 20). Although it is not clear whether the A-box sequence is directly recognized by APC/C-Cdh1, this sequence is required to activate the silent D-box in Aurora A (19, 20).
Aurora A and B are two essential mitotic protein kinases, initially identified as a result of oncogenic activities in tumor cells and mitotic phenotypes in Drosophila (2124). These two kinases control many cell cycle events, ranging from centrosome maturation to mitotic entry, spindle formation, kinetochore-microtubule dynamics, and cytokinesis (2124). Members of the mammalian Aurora kinases share a high degree of sequence identity, especially in the kinase domain (70% amino acid identity between human Aurora A and B). However, even with such a high degree of sequence similarity, members of Aurora family each exhibit a distinct pattern of cellular localization and control discrete cellular processes. For instance, Aurora A is associated with centrosomes from G2 until mitotic exit. In contrast, Aurora B, which complexes with inner centromere protein and survivin to form a chromosomal passenger complex, is localized at inner centromeres at prometaphase and metaphase, then at the spindle midzone during anaphase, and finally at the midbody during cytokinesis (23, 24).
Aurora kinases function through their phosphorylation of mitotic regulators and of structural components of centrosomes, mitotic spindle, kinetochores, and central spindle (25). To carry out their function in mitosis, the kinase activities of both Aurora A and B are tightly regulated in the cell cycle; both peak in mitosis and drop to nondetectable levels in G1 (26). Consistent with this, levels of both proteins also peak in mitosis and drop drastically in G1 (19, 20, 24, 27), implying the existence of an active protein degradation mechanism during mitotic exit. It has been shown previously that Aurora A is degraded by the APC/C pathway at the M to G1 transition (19, 20, 2830). However, the mechanism of Aurora B turnover remains unclear.
In this report, we set out to investigate the mechanism that regulates the levels of the Aurora B protein in the cell cycle. We observed that the stability of Aurora B is also under the control of the APC/C pathway. Aurora B is efficiently ubiquitinated in vitro by APC/C-Cdh1, but only weakly by APC/C-Cdc20. Endogenous Aurora B and Cdh1 specifically associate in vivo during mitotic exit, at a time when Aurora B is being degraded. Furthermore, a reduction of the Cdh1 protein level by RNA interference leads to stabilization of Aurora B. Efficient ubiquitination requires the presence of a D-box in the COOH-terminal region of the protein; mutation in this D-box prevents ubiquitination by APC/C-Cdh1 in vitro and results in stabilization of the mutant protein in vivo. We conclude that the APC/C-Cdh1 pathway confines the Aurora B kinase to mitosis through proteolytic degradation of the kinase as cells exit from mitosis into G1.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-HA antibody from Covance (Princeton, NJ). Cell culture, cell synchronization, and transfection. HeLa S3 and HeLa cells (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) were cultured in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies, Inc., Carlsbad, CA) and antibiotics. Cells were synchronized at either the G1-S boundary by a double-thymidine block or at prometaphase by a thymidine-nocodazole block (7). Arrested cells were released into fresh media to allow synchronous progression through the cell cycle.
Transfections were done with Effectene (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) per instruction of the manufacturer. Knockdown of Cdh1 (Fig. 3B) was done by transfecting cells with small interfering RNAs (Dharmacon, Lafayette, CO) directed against green fluorescent protein or Cdh1 using Oligofectamine as directed by the manufacturer (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). RNA interference target sequences are (in the sense orientation) green fluorescent protein: 5'-GCAAGCTGACCCTGAAGTTC-3' and Cdh1: 5'-GGATTAACGAGAATGAGAAGT-3', 5'-CAAGCTGCTGGTCTGGAAT-3'. Two small interfering RNA sequences targeted to Cdh1 gave comparable knockdown efficiency. Twenty-four hours post transfection, cells were incubated with 100 ng/mL nocodazole for 20 hours and nocodazole-arrested mitotic cells were released into fresh media containing 10 µg/mL cycloheximide (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA). At the indicated time points, cells were harvested by trypsinization and whole-cell extracts were Western blotted with the indicated antibodies.
|
|
Ubiquitination assays. Interphase extracts from Xenopus eggs (31) were immunoprecipitated with
-Cdc27 antibody-protein A beads for 2 hours at 4°C to purify APC/C (7). The APC/C beads were collected by centrifugation and washed five times in buffer XB [10 mmol/L HEPES-KOH (pH 7.8), 100 mmol/L KCl, 1 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.1 mmol/L CaCl2, 50 mmol/L sucrose] plus 500 mmol/L KCl and 0.5% NP40, and five times in buffer XB. Purified APC/C, on beads, was then incubated with recombinant Cdh1 or Cdc20 (18 pmol each) for 1 hour at 25°C followed by washing in buffer XB thrice. Ubiquitination reactions were initiated by mixing 35S-labeled substrates with E1 (50 µg/mL), E2 (50 µg/mL), ubiquitin (1.25 mg/mL), ubiquitin aldehyde (1 µmol/L), and an energy regeneration mix (7). Reactions were preformed at 25°C and stopped at various times in SDS sample buffer. Samples from time points were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and by PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics, Piscataway, NJ).
Immunoprecipitation and Western blotting. Cells were lysed in buffer [20 mmol/L HEPES-KOH (pH 7.6), 150 mmol/L KCl, 0.1 mmol/L EDTA, 0.5% NP40, 10% glycerol, containing a protease inhibitor cocktail (Complete, Roche, Indianapolis, IN), 0.5 µmol/L microcystin, and 1 mmol/L dithiolthreitol] on ice for 30 minutes followed by centrifugation at maximum speed in a microfuge for 30 minutes at 4°C. Clarified extracts were immunoprecipitated with the indicated antibodies overnight at 4°C. Immunocomplexes were collected by centrifugation, washed three times in the lysis buffer at 4°C, and then processed for SDS-PAGE and Western blotting. For Western blotting, whole-cell extracts or immunoprecipitates were separated by SDS-PAGE, electroblotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, blocked in 10% nonfat dry milk in buffer [10 mmol/L Tris-Cl (pH 7.8), 150 mmol/L NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20], and probed overnight with indicated antibodies in blocking buffer. Blots were developed using Enhanced Chemiluminescence Plus (Amersham, Piscataway, NJ) followed by scanning with a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Aurora B is a target of Cdh1 in vivo. To confirm that Aurora B is a target of APC/C-Cdh1 in vivo, we examined whether Aurora B and Cdh1 form a complex in mitotic cells. HeLa S3 cells were synchronized at prometaphase by a thymidine-nocodazole treatment and then released into fresh media. Cdh1 was immunoprecipitated at various time points after release and the immunocomplexes analyzed by Western blotting with Cdh1 and Aurora B antibodies. Aurora B specifically associated with Cdh1 during mitotic exit (Fig. 3A). The kinetics of association between Aurora B and Cdh1 is consistent with our above observations because levels of Aurora B decrease sharply just after the time at which we detect association between Cdh1 and Aurora B (Fig. 3A).
We next showed a requirement of Cdh1 in degradation of Aurora B in vivo. The level of endogenous Cdh1 was partially reduced through transfection of a small interfering RNA targeted to Cdh1 (Fig. 3B; ref. 33). Transfected cells were arrested at mitosis by incubating with nocodazole for 20 hours, and mitotic cells were then released into fresh media and examined at various time points in the presence of cycloheximide to determine the half-life of Aurora B in vivo (Fig. 3B). We observed that knockdown of Cdh1 resulted in a significant increase in the stability of Aurora B. Similarly, the stability of other well-characterized APC/C-Cdh1 substrates, such as Aurora A, was also increased in the Cdh1-knockdown cells (Fig. 3B). Under our partial knockdown conditions, a reduction of the Cdh1 level did not significantly alter the kinetics of mitotic exit as determined by examination of DAPI-stained cells under microscopy. Three hours post release, all of the transfected cells had completed mitosis and entered G1 (data not shown). Therefore, an elevation of Aurora B levels in Cdh1 knockdown cells could not be attributed to a delay in mitotic exit. Thus, the stability of Aurora B is under the control of the APC/C-Cdh1 pathway in vivo.
Aurora B DB1 mutant is stable in vivo. We next examined the recognition of Aurora B by APC/C-Cdh1 in vivo. HeLa cells were transfected with vectors expressing HA-Aurora B or HA-Aurora B DB1. Cells were arrested at prometaphase by a thymidine-nocodazole block. Mitotic cells were shook off and released into fresh media containing cycloheximide and the levels of HA-Aurora B and HA-Aurora B DB1 mutant were determined by Western blot analysis. Similar to the endogenous Aurora B, ectopically expressed HA-Aurora B was degraded on exit from mitosis (Fig. 4). In contrast, HA-Aurora B DB1 remained stable on exit from mitosis into G1. We conclude that degradation of Aurora B in vivo requires D-box 1, which provides independent support for the conclusion that Aurora B is degraded through the APC/C pathway in vivo.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The observation that Aurora B is a substrate for APC/C-Cdh1 is in sharp contrast to the previous observation that Aurora B is unable to be degraded by the APC/C pathway in Xenopus extracts that contain exogenous Cdh1 (28). A likely explanation for this discrepancy is that exogenously added recombinant Cdh1 may not fully activate APC/C in extracts. Indeed, of five physiologic substrates (Aurora A, securin, Kid, Cdc20, and Plk1) tested in our laboratory, only three (Aurora A, securin, and Kid) were degraded in Xenopus extracts in which APC/C had been activated by recombinant Cdh1.1
Aurora A and B are two key kinases controlling many different events in mitosis. Although both Aurora A and B are subtrates of APC/C-Cdh1, the efficiency of their ubiquitination in our reconstituted system is different. Aurora A is ubiquitinated more efficiently than Aurora B. The biochemical basis for this differential ubiquitination may result from the way by which Aurora A and Aurora B are recognized by APC/C-Cdh1. Although APC/C-Cdh1 recognizes D-boxes in the COOH-terminal regions of both proteins, the recognition toward Aurora A is greatly enhanced by a NH2-terminal A-box (RxLxPSN), also known as the D-box activation domain (28), which includes a known phosphorylation site in Aurora A (20). Mutation of this phosphorylation site within the A-box to aspartic acid stabilizes Aurora A (20). Interestingly, this phosphorylation site in Aurora A is conspicuously absent in Aurora B, although some elements of the A-box are partially conserved, including the RxL motif. Thus, it is possible that differential recognition of the A box in Aurora A and B may contribute to their differential ubiquitination by APC/C-Cdh1. At the functional level, this differential efficiency in ubiquitination between Aurora A and B may imply that, relative to that of Aurora A, a higher local concentration of Aurora B may be required for APC/C-Cdh1mediated ubiquitination. This higher local concentration could be achieved through spatial localization of the Aurora B kinase (e.g., at the midbody microtubule during cytokinesis; ref. 24). Thus, the differential efficiency in ubiquitination of Aurora A versus Aurora B may offer a temporal as well as a spatial regulation on the destruction of these two protein kinases during mitotic exit. This is consistent with our observation that, kinetically, Aurora A is degraded earlier than Aurora B during mitotic exit (data not shown).
What is the physiologic importance for degradation of Aurora B during mitotic exit and in G1? In mitosis, Aurora B regulates chromosome condensation, microtubule-kinetochore interaction, and cytokinesis. Kinetics of the degradation of Aurora B by the APC/C-Cdh1 pathway suggests that this degradation may be coupled to the initiation, progression, or completion of cytokinesis. Given that Aurora B is a key regulator of cytokinesis (22, 23), destruction of Aurora B may provide a temporal as well as a spatial control of cytokinesis. Consistent with this hypothesis, it has been shown that overexpression of Aurora B leads to multinuclearity and increased ploidy (2224), underscoring the importance of regulating the Aurora B protein level. Aurora B is also involved in chromosome condensation through phosphorylation of histone H3 during mitosis. Thus, unscheduled activity of Aurora B kinase in interphase cells, if the protein fails to be degraded in G1, may interfere with S-phase events, such as replication of DNA and cohesion of duplicated daughter DNA. We noted that expression of a nondegradable mutant of Aurora B (the DB1 mutant in Fig. 4) to moderate levels in HeLa cells did not lead to an obvious defect in mitotic exit or S-phase entry (data not shown), suggesting that degradation of Aurora B is one of the mechanisms, but not the sole mechanism, in the down-regulation of the kinase activity of the chromosomal passenger protein complex (Aurora B-inner centromere protein-survivin). We conclude that APC/C-mediated destruction of Aurora B provides a mechanism for precise control of the Aurora B kinase in the cell cycle. The fact that Aurora B is frequently overexpressed in various cancer cells may underscore the importance of this regulatory mechanism in the control of cell proliferation (2224).
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
We thank Wei-Meng Zhao and Jim Wong for the reagents and all the members of the Fang lab for helpful discussions.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received 5/ 3/05. Revised 7/ 3/05. Accepted 7/22/05.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-subunit HC8 and undergoes degradation in a proteasome-dependent manner. Mol Cell Biochem 2003;254:15762.[CrossRef][Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Ryser, E. Dizin, C. E. Jefford, B. Delaval, S. Gagos, A. Christodoulidou, K.-H. Krause, D. Birnbaum, and I. Irminger-Finger Distinct Roles of BARD1 Isoforms in Mitosis: Full-Length BARD1 Mediates Aurora B Degradation, Cancer-Associated BARD1{beta} Scaffolds Aurora B and BRCA2 Cancer Res., February 1, 2009; 69(3): 1125 - 1134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.-m. Zhao, J. A. Coppinger, A. Seki, X.-l. Cheng, J. R. Yates III, and G. Fang RCS1, a substrate of APC/C, controls the metaphase to anaphase transition PNAS, September 9, 2008; 105(36): 13415 - 13420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Yamamoto, A. L. Lewellyn, and J. L. Maller Regulation of the Aurora B Chromosome Passenger Protein Complex during Oocyte Maturation in Xenopus laevis Mol. Cell. Biol., June 15, 2008; 28(12): 4196 - 4203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Li, Q. Chen, M. Kaller, W. Nellen, R. Graf, and A. De Lozanne Dictyostelium Aurora Kinase Has Properties of both Aurora A and Aurora B Kinases Eukaryot. Cell, May 1, 2008; 7(5): 894 - 905. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Kaplow, A. H. Korayem, and T. R. Venkatesh Regulation of Glia Number in Drosophila by Rap/Fzr, an Activator of the Anaphase-Promoting Complex, and Loco, an RGS Protein Genetics, April 1, 2008; 178(4): 2003 - 2016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Connell, R. Colnaghi, and S. P. Wheatley Nuclear Survivin Has Reduced Stability and Is Not Cytoprotective J. Biol. Chem., February 8, 2008; 283(6): 3289 - 3296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Yang, D. G. Camp II, M. A. Gritsenko, Q. Luo, R. T. Kelly, T. R. W. Clauss, W. R. Brinkley, R. D. Smith, and D. L. Stenoien Identification of a novel mitotic phosphorylation motif associated with protein localization to the mitotic apparatus J. Cell Sci., November 15, 2007; 120(22): 4060 - 4070. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Yabuta, N. Okada, A. Ito, T. Hosomi, S. Nishihara, Y. Sasayama, A. Fujimori, D. Okuzaki, H. Zhao, M. Ikawa, et al. Lats2 Is an Essential Mitotic Regulator Required for the Coordination of Cell Division J. Biol. Chem., June 29, 2007; 282(26): 19259 - 19271. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Wang and Q. Zhan Cell Cycle-dependent Expression of Centrosomal Ninein-like Protein in Human Cells Is Regulated by the Anaphase-promoting Complex J. Biol. Chem., June 15, 2007; 282(24): 17712 - 17719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Seki and G. Fang CKAP2 Is a Spindle-associated Protein Degraded by APC/C-Cdh1 during Mitotic Exit J. Biol. Chem., May 18, 2007; 282(20): 15103 - 15113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. U. Hong, Y. S. Park, Y.-S. Seong, D. Kang, C.-D. Bae, and J. Park Functional Importance of the Anaphase-Promoting Complex-Cdh1-Mediated Degradation of TMAP/CKAP2 in Regulation of Spindle Function and Cytokinesis Mol. Cell. Biol., May 15, 2007; 27(10): 3667 - 3681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Vogel, C. Hager, and H. Bastians Mechanisms of Mitotic Cell Death Induced by Chemotherapy-Mediated G2 Checkpoint Abrogation Cancer Res., January 1, 2007; 67(1): 339 - 345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Carvajal, A. Tse, and G. K. Schwartz Aurora Kinases: New Targets for Cancer Therapy Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2006; 12(23): 6869 - 6875. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |