Cancer Research Cell Death Mechanisms and Cancer Therapy  Jordan
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Collins, A. T.
Right arrow Articles by Maitland, N. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Collins, A. T.
Right arrow Articles by Maitland, N. J.
[Cancer Research 65, 10946-10951, December 1, 2005]
© 2005 American Association for Cancer Research


Cell and Tumor Biology

Prospective Identification of Tumorigenic Prostate Cancer Stem Cells

Anne T. Collins1, Paul A. Berry1, Catherine Hyde1, Michael J. Stower2 and Norman J. Maitland1

1 Yorkshire Cancer Research Unit, Department of Biology, University of York and 2 Department of Urology, York Hospital, National Health Service Trust, York, United Kingdom

Requests for reprints: Anne T. Collins, Yorkshire Cancer Research Unit, Department of Biology, University of York, Heslington, York YO31 5D, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-1904-328708; Fax: 44-1904-328710; E-mail: ac43{at}york.ac.uk.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Existing therapies for prostate cancer eradicates the bulk of cells within a tumor. However, most patients go on to develop androgen-independent disease that remains incurable by current treatment strategies. There is now increasing evidence in some malignancies that the tumor cells are organized as a hierarchy originating from rare stem cells that are responsible for maintaining the tumor. We report here the identification and characterization of a cancer stem cell population from human prostate tumors, which possess a significant capacity for self-renewal. These cells are also able to regenerate the phenotypically mixed populations of nonclonogenic cells, which express differentiated cell products, such as androgen receptor and prostatic acid phosphatase. The cancer stem cells have a CD44+/{alpha}2ß1hi/CD133+ phenotype, and we have exploited these markers to isolate cells from a series of prostate tumors with differing Gleason grade and metastatic states. Approximately 0.1% of cells in any tumor expressed this phenotype, and there was no correlation between the number of CD44+/{alpha}2ß1hi/CD133+ cells and tumor grade. The identification of a prostate cancer stem cell provides a powerful tool to investigate the tumorigenic process and to develop therapies targeted to the stem cell.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Considerable research efforts have been directed toward the identification of markers associated with the initiation and progression of prostate cancer; yet, there is little consensus about the target cell within prostate epithelium that is susceptible to malignant transformation or about the mechanism that underlies the heterogeneity of prostate tumors. Prostate tumors are particularly heterogeneous (i.e., composed of cells with different phenotypic characteristics and different proliferative and malignant potentials; refs. 1, 2). In leukemia and some solid cancers, only a small subset of cells is clonogenic in culture and in vivo (3, 4). This led to the hypothesis that only a rare, phenotypically distinct subset of cells has the capacity to form new tumors and that this subgroup could be considered as cancer stem cells (4). To prove this hypothesis, subsets of uncultured cancer cells, enriched for the ability to form new tumors, would have to be purified. This was accomplished by Bonnet and Dick (5) who showed that a small proportion of human acute myeloid leukemic (AML) cells expressed the stem cell phenotype CD34+ and that only these cells were able to transfer AML to immunodeficient mice. Since this seminal article, similar studies have shown that subpopulations of tumor cells from breast (6), brain (7, 8), and lung (9) have stem cell characteristics.

We have pioneered the identification and isolation of stem cells from human prostate epithelia based on high surface expression of integrin {alpha}2ß1 (10) and CD133 (11). As tumor cells might be expected to share some of their antigenic properties with tissue stem cells from the same organ (5), we have applied the same techniques used to isolate normal prostate epithelial stem cells to the analysis of the tumorigenic cells in human prostate cancers. We report here the identification and characterization of cells from primary and metastatic prostate tumors that have cancer stem cell characteristics, namely a capacity for extensive proliferation, self-renewal, differentiation, and invasion.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Tissue collection, isolation, and culture of tumor stem cells. Human prostatic tissue was obtained, with patient consent, from 40 patients (age range 56-69 years) undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Prostate cancer was confirmed by histologic examination of representative adjacent fragments. In some cases, lymph node biopsies were taken if metastasis was suspected. CD44/{alpha}2ß1hi/CD133+ cells were isolated from the tissue, as described previously for normal prostate epithelium (11), and were subsequently placed in long-term culture from four tumor samples and one benign biopsy. Cultures were maintained in complete keratinocyte growth medium [keratinocyte serum-free medium with epidermal growth factor (EGF) and bovine pituitary extract; Invitrogen, Paisley, Scotland]. The medium was also supplemented with 2 ng/mL of leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF; Sigma, Poole, United Kingdom), 2 ng/mL of stem cell factor (Sigma), and 100 ng/mL of cholera toxin (Sigma).

Cultures were also derived from two lymph node metastasis of the prostate but initially from an unselected epithelial population. However, after expansion in culture, CD44/{alpha}2ß1hi/CD133+ were isolated and cultures were derived.

Colony-forming and long-term serial culture assays. The potential of the tumor populations, CD44+/{alpha}2ß1hi/CD133+ (stem cells), CD44+/{alpha}2ß1hi/CD133 (transit amplifying population), and CD44+/{alpha}2ß1low (committed basal population), to form colonies was compared with the unselected tumor population. Briefly, the above phenotypes were counted and plated on collagen-coated (BD-Biocoat) plates (BD Biosciences, Oxford, United Kingdom) for the determination of both colony-forming efficiency and self-renewal. Colonies were counted, ring-cloned (after 28 days if they contained >32 cells), and replated into individual wells of a 24-well plate. As the number of cells selected was small, irradiated (60 Gy) STO (mouse embryonic fibroblasts) cells were added as feeders. For the long-term serial culture assays, used to determine the proliferative potential of selected phenotypes, cells were passaged continuously. At each passage, the number of cells generated by each fraction was determined. The cumulative total cell output from the initial 103 cells was calculated at the end of the experiment, assuming that all cells from each passage had been replated.

Anchorage-independent growth was also assessed in methylcellulose (Miltenyi Biotec Ltd., Bisley, Surrey, United Kingdom). Briefly, the above phenotypes were placed in complete methylcellulose (supplemented with EGF, bovine pituitary extract, stem cell factor, LIF, and cholera toxin at the concentrations used for complete keratinocyte serum-free medium) and the number of surviving cells was counted after 28 days. The results were subjected to a paired t test to determine statistical significance.

Immunofluorescent staining of CD44+/{alpha}2ß1hi/CD133+ cells. CD44+/{alpha}2ß1hi/CD133+ cells were selected directly from disaggregated tumor tissue or cultured cells from tumors before processing for dual-color imaging under confocal microscopy by fixation in ice-cold methanol for 20 minutes and permeabilization in 0.4% Triton X-100 (Sigma) containing 0.3% normal goat serum (NGS) for 10 minutes. After blocking (1:5 dilution of NGS in TBS for 10 minutes), cells were incubated with antibodies against keratins 1, 5, 10, and 14 (clone 34ßE12, DakoCytomation, Ely, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom); keratin 5 (clone RCK103, BD PharMingen, Oxford, England); keratin 14 (clone LL002, Serotec Ltd., Oxford, England); keratin 19 (clone RCK 108, DakoCytomation); keratin 18 (clone CY-90; Sigma); c-Met (clone 8F11, Vector Laboratories, Inc., Peterborough, United Kingdom); prostatic acid phosphatase (clone PASE/4LJ, DakoCytomation); androgen receptor (clone AR27, Novocastra Laboratories Ltd., Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom); and prostate-specific stem cell antigen (clone 2399, kindly donated by Genentech, Inc., San Franscisco, CA) or a nonspecific isotype control for 1 hour. Appropriate positive control cells were stained in parallel for each antibody used for CD133+ cell phenotyping. After washing (3x TBS), cells were further probed with FITC-tagged secondary antibody. Cells were mounted in the antiphotobleaching medium Vectashield containing 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Vector Laboratories).

Invasion activity assay in Matrigel. The ability of epithelial cells to migrate through Matrigel was determined by the modified Boyden-chamber method (12). Briefly, tumor cells, derived initially from CD133+-selected populations from patients with prostate cancer, were plated onto Matrigel-coated 8 µm filters. Conditioned medium from prostate stromal cultures (13) was used as a chemoattractant. Cells invading through Matrigel and filters were counted 48 hours after plating. Epithelial cells from benign prostate and PNT1a (an immortalized cell line from benign prostate) were used as negative controls. The positive controls were PC3M (metastatic prostate cancer cell line) and MCF7 (metastatic breast cancer cell line). The results were subjected to a paired t test to determine statistical significance.

Differentiation of adult CD44+/{alpha}2ß1hi/CD133+ isolated from prostate tumors. CD44+/{alpha}2ß1hi/CD133+ cells were isolated from tumor biopsies and cultured for up to 21 days in RPMI 1640 (Invitrogen), supplemented with 10% FCS and 10–9 mol/L dihydrotestosterone. Cells were subsequently processed for dual-color staining flow cytometry. Dual staining was done on cells fixed and permeabilized in 1% saponin (Sigma). Cells were separated on a DakoCytomation CyAn high-performance flow cytometer and analyzed using DakoCytomation Summit version 3.3 software (DakoCytomation).

Genotype analysis of tumor cells. To confirm the identity of the cultures from primary tissues, 40 ng of DNA extracted from the cultured cells derived by CD133 selection was compared with DNA extracted from peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) taken from the same patient (14). In some cases, a third comparison, with DNA extracted from serial frozen tissue sections, was also used. Primers spanning five highly polymorphic microsatellites (D8S262, D8S264, D8S560, D8S592, and D16S422), one of which was labeled with a Beckman dye (D2, D3, or D4), were used in a PCR as previously described (14). Touchdown PCR to take account of varying base pair composition was used (10 minutes at 94°C; followed by 16 touchdown cycles of 94°C/45 seconds, 60-52°C/45 seconds, 72°C/30 seconds; then 16 cycles of 94°C/45 seconds; 52°C/45 seconds, 72°C/30 seconds; and finally 72°C/7 minutes). Analysis of the labeled fragments was accomplished on a Beckman Coulter CEQ8000 and proprietary CEQ fragment analysis software to accurately size and quantify alleles.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Tumor CD44+/{alpha}2ß1hi/CD133+ cells exhibit a high proliferative potential in vitro. We have previously established that the phenotype {alpha}2ß1hi/CD133+ determines normal prostate epithelial stem cells (11). To establish whether {alpha}2ß1hi/CD133+ cells were present in prostate tumors, we initially used MACS bead sorting to determine the proportion of CD133-expressing cells in a series of 40 prostate tumors. Regardless of the tumor grade, a small population (ranging from 0.1% to 0.3%) of CD133-expressing cells could be isolated (results not shown) from all tumors tested.

To determine whether tumor {alpha}2ß1hi/CD133+ cells were distinct from the bulk population of cancer cells, we next looked at the proliferative properties of six independently derived tumor cultures in vitro. Long-term cultures were established from four primary prostate tumors and two metastatic prostate tumors from this larger series (Table 1). Self-renewal of specific phenotypes was measured by replating primary colonies and subsequently measuring secondary colony-forming efficiency. As shown in Fig. 1A, the CD44+/{alpha}2ß1hi/CD133+ cells gave rise to 3.7-fold greater numbers of colonies than the total population and this number was significantly greater (P < 0.05) than those formed from either CD44+/{alpha}2ß1hi/CD133 or CD44+/{alpha}2ß1low cells. Indeed, 30-fold fewer colonies were founded by the CD44+/{alpha}2ß1low population compared with the CD133–selected population. There was no significant difference (P > 0.05) between the primary and secondary colony-forming efficiency of the stem cell population, whereas the ability of the transit amplifying population (CD44+/{alpha}2ß1hi/CD133) to undergo self-renewal (secondary colony-forming efficiency) was significantly lower than the stem cell population (P < 0.005). Few primary colonies were founded by CD44+/{alpha}2ß1low cells and the majority was abortive after one to three rounds of cell division. The ability of this population to form secondary colonies was also significantly less than the stem cell population (P < 0.005; 44-fold less secondary colonies founded). Primary colonies were not founded by the secretory luminal (CD44/CD57+) population.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Summary of patient population

 


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1. CD44+/{alpha}2ß1hi/CD133+ cells have a high proliferative potential in vitro. A, primary colony-forming efficiency (CFE) of CD44+/{alpha}2ß1hi/CD133+, CD44+/{alpha}2ß1hi/CD133, and CD44+/{alpha}2ß1low cells relative to unselected population (black columns). Secondary colony-forming efficiency relative to unselected population (white columns). Columns, mean of three experiments; bars, SD. B, the proliferative potential of CD44+/{alpha}2ß1hi/CD133+–derived cells from prostate tumors. Two lymph node metastasis [PE228 ({blacksquare}), dashed line; PE605 ({square}), solid line], one poorly differentiated Gleason 9 (PE434 ({blacksquare}), solid line), two moderately differentiated Gleason 7 [PE484 ({blacktriangleup}), dashed line; PE563 ({triangleup}), solid line], and one benign prostate [PE352 ({circ}), solid line].

 
To show whether CD44+/{alpha}2ß1hi/CD133+ cells were capable of extensive proliferation (e.g., generating progeny several orders of magnitude higher that the starting population), cultures were generated from a series of prostate primary and metastatic tumors from a starting population of 103 CD44+/{alpha}2ß1hi/CD133+ cells (Fig. 1B). The data clearly indicate that tumor cultures derived from CD133+ cells have an enhanced proliferative potential. In contrast, the proliferative potential of CD133+ cells, derived from benign prostate, was much lower and proliferation ceased after ~12 PD.

Quantification of CD133 expression, by MACS cell sorting, in long-term cultures of prostate cancer cells ranged from 0.3% to 1.6% (Table 2). Regardless of time in culture, the proportion of CD133-expressing cells remained relatively constant and did not differ significantly from the freshly isolated population (P > 0.05).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. CD133+ cells are maintained in long-term cultures of prostate cancer cells

 
Tumor cell origins of the in vitro cultures. To confirm that we had derived CD133 cells from tumors and not from contaminating normal stem cells, we determined the potential of this subpopulation to invade through Matrigel and survive in suspension culture (Fig. 2). Compared with the positive controls [a metastatic prostate cancer cell line (PC3M) and a metastatic breast cancer cell line (MCF7)], four of six cultures derived from prostate tumors were significantly more invasive than both PC3M and MCF7 (P < 0.005) and the remaining two of six tumor cultures were as invasive as the cancer cell line controls (Fig. 2A).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2. Tumor cell origins of the in vitro cultures. A, in vitro invasion assay using cultures of one normal biopsy (benign prostate), two lymph node metastases (PE228, PE605), two poorly differentiated Gleason 8/9 (PE434, PE569), and two moderately differentiated Gleason 7 (PE484, PE563). Two positive controls (PC3M and MCF7) and one negative control (PNT1a). The percentage of cells migrating into Matrigel was measured in the presence of stromal conditioned medium as a chemoattractant in the medium below the Matrigel. Columns, mean of three experiments; bars, SD. B, survival of CD44+/{alpha}2ß1hi/CD133+ and CD44+/{alpha}2ß1hi/CD133 cells in methylcellulose. Values shown are for survival relative to the unselected population (value = 1) from four independent patients. Surviving cells were counted after 28 days in complete methylcellulose medium. Note that similar populations of cells from benign prostate did not survive under these culture conditions. Mean (with SD) of four experiments.

 
A further indication of tumor cell origin came from replating cells in semisolid medium (methylcellulose) and subsequently determining anchorage-independent survival. CD44+/{alpha}2ß1hi/CD133+ cells, from four separate tumors, showed enhanced survival relative to the unselected tumor cell population (median 3-fold higher) and even greater survival (median 8-fold higher) compared with the more differentiated CD44+/{alpha}2ß1low cells (Fig. 2B).

On isolation of small cell populations, there is a finite possibility of cross-contamination between cultures. Indeed, this seems to have been a common occurrence in various tumor cell banks. To verify the identity of all cultures, a microsatellite analysis using a panel of five highly polymorphic loci was routinely done. Although this was unable to unequivocally confirm the tumor cell origin of the cultured cells, the microsatellite signatures matched cultures to the PBLs (and in some cases the original tissues) of the patient from which the culture was derived. All the long-term cultures were of human origin and did not derive from the irradiated STO feeder cells. Two examples of this (for cultures P434 and P484) with three of five microsatellites are shown in Fig. 3. In two of six cultures (shown for tumor P434 with the microsatellite D8S264), evidence of microsatellite instability was observed but only in the tumor cultures and not in the patient's PBL DNA.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3. Genetic identity of cultured prostate cancer stem cells. Raw data from Beckman-Coulter CEQ800 analysis of matched DNA from PBL and stem cell–derived cultures from patients P434 and P484. Electropherograms are aligned for the three polymorphic markers D8S264, D8S560, and D16S422 on the internal markers (red peaks). Note multiple peaks of similar intensity in P434 (arrow) with D8S264, characteristic of microsatellite instability.

 
CD44+/{alpha}2ß1hi/CD133+ cells differentiate to an androgen receptor–positive phenotype similar to prostate cancers in situ. To determine whether the tumor stem cell population was capable of differentiation to a secretory luminal phenotype, we applied conditions previously used to induce differentiation of normal prostate epithelium. As the prostate is an androgen-dependent organ, where the bulk population of tumor cells is responsive to the effects of androgen, cultures were treated with 1 nmol/L dihydrotestosterone in serum-containing medium and the resultant phenotypes were determined by flow cytometry. Immunocytochemical analysis of isolated CD133+ cells (purified either directly from disaggregated tumor samples or after expansion in culture) showed that this small population had a basal phenotype (Fig. 4A). CD133+ cells expressed the high-molecular-weight keratins 5 and 14, as well as keratin 19. Keratin 18 was weakly expressed and only in a minority of the population. c-MET, a marker of the transit-amplifying population (15), and the markers associated with the terminally differentiated cells in the prostate, androgen receptor, and prostatic acid phosphatase were not expressed. We also looked at prostate-specific stem cell antigen expression, which is a marker of intermediate prostate epithelial cells (16) and as expected it was not expressed within the CD133-selected population. Although the expanded tumor cultures were capable of some degree of differentiation under serum-free culture conditions, higher expression levels of the androgen receptor and prostatic acid phosphatase were only achieved after treating the cultures with serum and dihydrotestosterone (Fig. 4B). CD133 expression was also determined under differentiating conditions and was characteristically reduced [by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis] but not eliminated after serum and dihydrotestosterone treatment in the two cultures examined (Table 3).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4. Differentiated phenotype of isolated prostate cancer stem cells. CD44+/{alpha}2ß1hi/CD133+ cells differentiate to produce phenotypes similar to those present in the primary tumor. A, phenotype of CD44+/{alpha}2ß1hi/CD133+ cells after initial isolation from prostate tumor tissue. Confocal images were double-labeled with primary antibodies indirectly labeled with FITC and the nuclear stain, DAPI. B, flow-cytometric analysis of CD44+/{alpha}2ß1hi/CD133+–derived tumor cultures showing induction of epithelial differentiation to a secretory luminal phenotype [keratin 18 (K18), androgen receptor (AR), and prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) expression]. Cultures were grown in serum-free conditions (red line) or in the presence of dihydrotestosterone and serum (black line). Patient 434 (Gleason 9; top) and patient 605 (lymph node metastasis; bottom).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. CD133+ cell content of cultures decreases after differentiation treatment

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We have previously established that the cell surface markers, CD44+/{alpha}2ß1hi/CD133+, can be used to locate and isolate an epithelial stem cell population from normal human prostate (10, 11). The experiments we describe here constitute the first successful attempt to isolate and characterize the cancer stem cell population from human prostate tumors using identical markers. There are three lines of evidence to support that these cells are tumor stem cells: (a) they represent a small fraction of the total cells comprising the tumor, (b) they self-renew and proliferate, and (c) they differentiate to recapitulate the phenotype of the tumor from which they were derived.

Regardless of tumor grade, a small population of CD133-expressing cells could be isolated from a large series of prostate tumors, which included metastatic lesions. This proportion of stem cells is in contrast with a recent publication by Singh et al. (7), who reported that brain tumors, particularly high-grade medulloblastomas, contained two orders of magnitude higher numbers of CD133-expressing cells compared with prostate tumors. Nonetheless, the levels of CD133-expressing cells are more consistent with our previous findings with normal prostate epithelial stem cells (11), where the CD133+ cells constitute 1% of the basal population.

There are striking similarities between normal tissue homeostasis and tumorigenesis. Stem cells are functionally defined as self-renewing and multipotent, generating the mature cell types of a particular tissue through differentiation. In malignancies, such as leukemia (5) and breast (6), brain (8), and, more recently, lung (9) cancers, rare cells have been isolated with a remarkable potential for self-renewal. These cells were distinct from the bulk of the tumor in driving tumor growth and maintenance.

We found that only tumor-derived CD133+ cells were capable of self-renewal and extensive proliferation. In contrast, more differentiated phenotypes did not form secondary colonies and a comparison of the proliferative potential of CD133+ cells from benign prostate showed the capacity of tumor-derived CD133+ cells to proliferate extensively in vitro, which is similar to our previous findings with benign prostate (11). Thus, CD133 expression identifies an exclusive subpopulation of prostate tumor cells that are potentially immortal (having undergone >30 PD in culture to date) compared with similar populations of cells from nonmalignant prostate.

Although we acknowledge that the ultimate test of tumorigenicity is transplantation in vivo, we do provide compelling evidence that the CD133-derived cultures were tumorigenic as they were invasive in Matrigel (12) and survived in suspension culture at clonal densities. In our hands, most primary prostate tumor cells do not form large discrete colonies in methylcellulose (if plated at cloning densities), as found with mammary (17) and neural tumors (7).

The cultured cells were, in all cases used for biological characterization, identical by microsatellite analysis to the genotype of the patient from which they were derived. Although insufficient microsatellite markers were used to determine the extent of allelic imbalance, in two cases, microsatellite instability, which has been observed in a proportion of prostate tumor biopsies and associated with prostate cancer recurrence after therapy (18, 19), was detected in the cultured tumor stem cells. A fuller analysis of multiple loci and a detailed assessment of degrees of heritable genetic change by single nucleotide polymorphism analysis, with the Affymetrix 100k single nucleotide polymorphism chip using purified cell populations is currently under way. There is no certainty that the cancer stem cells will show the full extent of chromosomal damage found in previous analyses of prostate tissue DNA, as genetic heterogeneity in a large developing malignant tumor (sufficiently large for such analysis and often containing a significant stromal component) is likely to be great (14, 20).

The cellular origins of prostate cancer are still controversial. It has been suggested that prostate cancers arise from the terminally differentiated luminal cells (21) because the bulk population of tumor cells, in the most common form of prostate cancer, express luminal cell-specific markers (cytokeratins 8 and 18, androgen receptor, prostate-specific antigen, and prostatic acid phosphatase), but lack expression of basal cell markers, such as p63. Other studies suggest that the disease is derived from intermediate progenitors that have acquired the ability to self-renew (22). Xin et al. (23) recently reported that introduction of constitutively active AKT in Sca-1-enriched murine prostate epithelial cells results in the initiation of prostate tumorigenesis. Moreover, Sca-1-sorted cells, enriched for cells with prostate-regenerating activity, showed evidence of both basal and luminal lineage. Our data suggest that prostate tumors originate from basal cells expressing CD133 as this fraction exclusively had the ability to self-renew and differentiate into the mature cell types, which characterize the vast majority of prostate tumors.

By exploiting shared antigen expression between normal and cancer stem cells, we have been able to identify and isolate a population of cells that is highly enriched for a phenotype that is consistent with a cancer stem cell for prostate. With evidence of self-renewal, proliferation, and differentiation that recapitulates the original tumor phenotype, we have defined a class of prostate cancer stem cells that can be prospectively isolated from prostate tumors. These cells form a small subset of the population even after long-term culture. Therefore, we would predict that both tumor heterogeneity and the overall androgen-sensitive phenotype of human prostate cancers is the consequence of differentiation from an androgen receptor–negative stem cell population. Although further in vivo experiments are required to determine whether the tumor-initiating cells are comparable with the in vitro phenotype, this study provides evidence of the origin of prostate cancer from a CD133-enriched cell, that possesses stem cell properties and can serve as targets for the initiation of prostate tumorigenesis and metastasis.


    Acknowledgments
 
Grant support: Yorkshire Cancer Research (Harrogate, United Kingdom) and the United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

We thank Michelle Scaife for assembly of the manuscript, Steve Bryce for DNA samples, and Celina Whalley for technical assistance with microsatellite analysis.

Received 6/13/05. Revised 8/19/05. Accepted 9/ 6/05.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Heppner GH. Tumor heterogeneity. Cancer Res 1984;44:2259–65.[Free Full Text]
  2. Nowell PC. Mechanisms of tumor progression. Cancer Res 1986;46:2203–7.[Free Full Text]
  3. Wodinsky I, Swiniarski J, Kensler CJ. Spleen colony studies of leukemia L1210. Differential sensitivities of normal hematopoietic and resistant L1210 colony-forming cells to 6-mercaptopurine (NSC-755). Cancer Chemother Rep 1967;51:415–21.
  4. Hamburger AW, Salmon SE. Primary bioassay of human tumor stem cells. Science 1977;197:461–3.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Bonnet D, Dick JE. Human acute leukaemia is organized as a hierarchy that originates from a primitive hematopoietic cell. Nat Med 1997;3:730–7.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Al-Hajj M, Wicha S, Benito-Hernandez A, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF. Prospective isolation of tumorigenic breast cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:3983–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Singh SK, Clarke ID, Terasaki M, et al. Identification of a cancer stem cell in human brain tumors. Cancer Res 2003;63:5821–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Singh SK, Hawkins C, Clarke ID, et al. Identification of human brain tumor initiating cells. Nature 2004;432:396–401.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Bender Kim CF, Jackson EL, Woolfenden AE, et al. Identification of bronchioalveolar stem cells in normal lung and lung cancer. Cell 2005;121:823–35.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Collins AT, Habib FK, Maitland NJ, Neal DE. Identification and isolation of human prostate epithelial stem cells based on {alpha}2ß1-integrin expression. J Cell Sci 2001;114:3865–72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Richardson GD, Robson CN, Lang SH, Neal DE, Maitland NJ, Collins AT. CD133, a novel marker for human prostatic epithelial stem cells. J Cell Sci 2004;117:3539–45.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Albini A, Iwamoto Y, Kleinman HK, et al. A rapid in vitro assay for quantitating the invasive potential of tumor cells. Cancer Res 1987;47:3239–45.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Collins AT, Zhiming B, Gilmore K, Neal DE. Androgen and oestrogen responsiveness of stromal cells derived from the human hyperplastic prostate: oestrogen regulation of the androgen receptor. J Endocrinol 1994;143:269–77.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Macintosh CA, Stower M, Reid N, Maitland NJ. Precise microdissection of human prostate cancers reveals genotypic heterogeneity. Cancer Res 1998;58:23–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. van Leenders GJIH, Schalken JA. Stem cell differentiation within the human prostate epithelium: implications for prostate carcinogenesis. BJU Int 2001;21:35–42.
  16. Tran CP, Lin C, Yamashiro J, Reiter RE. Prostate stem cell antigen is a marker of late intermediate prostate epithelial cells. Mol Cancer Res 2002;1:113–21.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Dontu G, Wicha MS. Survival of mammary stem cells in suspension culture: implications for stem cell biology and neoplasia. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2005;10:75–86.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Karan D, Schmied BM, Dave B, Wittel UA, Lin M-F, Batra SK. Decreased androgen responsive growth of prostate cancer is associated with increased genetic alterations. Clin Cancer Res 2001;7:3472–80.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Velasco A, Hewitt SM, Albert PS, et al. Differential expression of the mismatch repair gene hMSH2 in malignant prostate tissue is associated with cancer recurrence. Cancer 2002;94:690–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Nupponen N, Kakkola L, Koivisto P, Visakorpi T. Genetic alterations in hormone refractory recurrent prostate carcinomas. Am J Human Pathol 1998;153:141–8.
  21. Signoretti S, Waltregny D, Dilks J, et al. p63 is a prostate basal cell marker and is required for prostate development. Am J Pathol 2000;157:1769–75.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Van Leenders G, van Balken B, Aalders T, Hulsbergen-ven de Kaa C, Ruiter D, Schalken J. Intermediate cells in normal and malignant prostate epithelium express c-MET: implication for prostate cancer invasion. Prostate 2002;51:98–107.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Xin L, Lawson DA, Witte ON. The Sca-1 cell surface marker enriches for a prostate-regenerating cell subpopulation that can initiate prostate tumorigenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005;102:6942–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
D. J. Mulholland, L. Xin, A. Morim, D. Lawson, O. Witte, and H. Wu
Lin-Sca-1+CD49fhigh Stem/Progenitors Are Tumor-Initiating Cells in the Pten-Null Prostate Cancer Model
Cancer Res., November 15, 2009; 69(22): 8555 - 8562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. A. Hubbard, A. M. Friel, B. Kumar, L. Zhang, B. R. Rueda, and C. E. Gargett
Evidence for Cancer Stem Cells in Human Endometrial Carcinoma
Cancer Res., November 1, 2009; 69(21): 8241 - 8248.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
G. Bertolini, L. Roz, P. Perego, M. Tortoreto, E. Fontanella, L. Gatti, G. Pratesi, A. Fabbri, F. Andriani, S. Tinelli, et al.
Highly tumorigenic lung cancer CD133+ cells display stem-like features and are spared by cisplatin treatment
PNAS, September 22, 2009; 106(38): 16281 - 16286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
V. Tirino, R. Camerlingo, R. Franco, D. Malanga, A. La Rocca, G. Viglietto, G. Rocco, and G. Pirozzi
The role of CD133 in the identification and characterisation of tumour-initiating cells in non-small-cell lung cancer
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., September 1, 2009; 36(3): 446 - 453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vet PatholHome page
M. J. Hynes, K. M. Huang, and E. H. Huang
REVIEW PAPER: Implications of the "Cancer Stem Cell" Hypothesis on Murine Models of Colon Cancer and Colitis-associated Cancer
Vet. Pathol., September 1, 2009; 46(5): 819 - 835.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
T. Oda, T. Tian, M. Inoue, J.-i. Ikeda, Y. Qiu, M. Okumura, K. Aozasa, and E. Morii
Tumorigenic Role of Orphan Nuclear Receptor NR0B1 in Lung Adenocarcinoma
Am. J. Pathol., September 1, 2009; 175(3): 1235 - 1245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
J. J. Short and D. T. Curiel
Oncolytic adenoviruses targeted to cancer stem cells
Mol. Cancer Ther., August 1, 2009; 8(8): 2096 - 2102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
M. Schmidt, M. E. Scheulen, C. Dittrich, P. Obrist, N. Marschner, L. Dirix, M. Schmidt, D. Ruttinger, M. Schuler, C. Reinhardt, et al.
An open-label, randomized phase II study of adecatumumab, a fully human anti-EpCAM antibody, as monotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer
Ann. Onc., July 24, 2009; (2009) mdp314v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Rutella, G. Bonanno, A. Procoli, A. Mariotti, M. Corallo, M. G. Prisco, A. Eramo, C. Napoletano, D. Gallo, A. Perillo, et al.
Cells with Characteristics of Cancer Stem/Progenitor Cells Express the CD133 Antigen in Human Endometrial Tumors
Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2009; 15(13): 4299 - 4311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Prevention ResearchHome page
J. Li and J. Kim
Molecular Profiles of Finasteride Effects on Prostate Carcinogenesis
Cancer Prevention Research, June 1, 2009; 2(6): 518 - 524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Acta Biochim Biophys SinHome page
W. Zhuang, Z. Qin, and Z. Liang
The role of autophagy in sensitizing malignant glioma cells to radiation therapy
Acta Biochim Biophys Sin, May 1, 2009; 41(5): 341 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Yanagisawa, I. Kadouchi, K. Yokomori, M. Hirose, M. Hakozaki, H. Hojo, K. Maeda, E. Kobayashi, and T. Murakami
Identification and Metastatic Potential of Tumor-Initiating Cells in Malignant Rhabdoid Tumor of the Kidney
Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2009; 15(9): 3014 - 3022.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
E. Vlashi, K. Kim, C. Lagadec, L. D. Donna, J. T. McDonald, M. Eghbali, J. W. Sayre, E. Stefani, W. McBride, and F. Pajonk
In Vivo Imaging, Tracking, and Targeting of Cancer Stem Cells
J Natl Cancer Inst, March 4, 2009; 101(5): 350 - 359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
Hongling Du and H. S. Taylor
Reviews: Stem Cells and Female Reproduction
Reproductive Sciences, February 1, 2009; 16(2): 126 - 139.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
S. Ando, R. Abe, M. Sasaki, J. Murata, D. Inokuma, and H. Shimizu
Bone Marrow-Derived Cells Are Not the Origin of the Cancer Stem Cells in Ultraviolet-Induced Skin Cancer
Am. J. Pathol., February 1, 2009; 174(2): 595 - 601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Genomics ProteomicsHome page
I. L. BOTCHKINA, R. A. ROWEHL, D. E. RIVADENEIRA, M. S. KARPEH JR., H. CRAWFORD, A. DUFOUR, J. JU, Y. WANG, Y. LEYFMAN, and G. I. BOTCHKINA
Phenotypic Subpopulations of Metastatic Colon Cancer Stem Cells: Genomic Analysis
Cancer Genomics Proteomics, January 1, 2009; 6(1): 19 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am Soc Clin Oncol Ed BookHome page
L. Miele, N. Takebe, and S. P. Ivy
The Cancer Stem Cell Hypothesis, Embryonic Signaling Pathways, and Therapeutics: Targeting an Elusive Concept
ASCO Educational Book, January 1, 2009; 2009(1): 145 - 156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. S. Goldstein, D. A. Lawson, D. Cheng, W. Sun, I. P. Garraway, and O. N. Witte
Trop2 identifies a subpopulation of murine and human prostate basal cells with stem cell characteristics
PNAS, December 30, 2008; 105(52): 20882 - 20887.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. Wang, Y. Lu, J. Wang, A. E. Koch, J. Zhang, and R. S. Taichman
CXCR6 Induces Prostate Cancer Progression by the AKT/Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Signaling Pathway
Cancer Res., December 15, 2008; 68(24): 10367 - 10377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
D. J. Vander Griend, W. L. Karthaus, S. Dalrymple, A. Meeker, A. M. DeMarzo, and J. T. Isaacs
The Role of CD133 in Normal Human Prostate Stem Cells and Malignant Cancer-Initiating Cells
Cancer Res., December 1, 2008; 68(23): 9703 - 9711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant BiolHome page
R.U. Lukacs, D.A. Lawson, L. Xin, Y. Zong, I. Garraway, A.S. Goldstein, S. Memarzadeh, and O.N. Witte
Epithelial Stem Cells of the Prostate and Their Role in Cancer Progression
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, November 6, 2008; (2008) sqb.2008.73.012v1.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
I. Zucchi, S. Astigiano, G. Bertalot, S. Sanzone, C. Cocola, P. Pelucchi, G. Bertoli, M. Stehling, O. Barbieri, A. Albertini, et al.
Distinct populations of tumor-initiating cells derived from a tumor generated by rat mammary cancer stem cells
PNAS, November 4, 2008; 105(44): 16940 - 16945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
L. Du, H. Wang, L. He, J. Zhang, B. Ni, X. Wang, H. Jin, N. Cahuzac, M. Mehrpour, Y. Lu, et al.
CD44 is of Functional Importance for Colorectal Cancer Stem Cells
Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2008; 14(21): 6751 - 6760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. C. Kirkland and H. Ying
{alpha}2{beta}1 Integrin Regulates Lineage Commitment in Multipotent Human Colorectal Cancer Cells
J. Biol. Chem., October 10, 2008; 283(41): 27612 - 27619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. M. Yi, H.-C. Tsai, S. C. Glockner, S. Lin, J. E. Ohm, H. Easwaran, C. D. James, J. F. Costello, G. Riggins, C. G. Eberhart, et al.
Abnormal DNA Methylation of CD133 in Colorectal and Glioblastoma Tumors
Cancer Res., October 1, 2008; 68(19): 8094 - 8103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
B. Bussolati, S. Bruno, C. Grange, U. Ferrando, and G. Camussi
Identification of a tumor-initiating stem cell population in human renal carcinomas
FASEB J, October 1, 2008; 22(10): 3696 - 3705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
D. M. Simeone
Pancreatic Cancer Stem Cells: Implications for the Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2008; 14(18): 5646 - 5648.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
H. L. Goel, J. Li, S. Kogan, and L. R Languino
Integrins in prostate cancer progression
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2008; 15(3): 657 - 664.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
G. P. Risbridger and R. A. Taylor
Regulation of Prostatic Stem Cells by Stromal Niche in Health and Disease
Endocrinology, September 1, 2008; 149(9): 4303 - 4306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
W.-W. Chang, C. H. Lee, P. Lee, J. Lin, C.-W. Hsu, J.-T. Hung, J.-J. Lin, J.-C. Yu, L.-e. Shao, J. Yu, et al.
Expression of Globo H and SSEA3 in breast cancer stem cells and the involvement of fucosyl transferases 1 and 2 in Globo H synthesis
PNAS, August 19, 2008; 105(33): 11667 - 11672.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J.-i. Ikeda, E. Morii, Y. Liu, Y. Qiu, N. Nakamichi, R. Jokoji, Y. Miyoshi, S. Noguchi, and K. Aozasa
Prognostic Significance of CD55 Expression in Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2008; 14(15): 4780 - 4786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
Y. Xiao, Y. Ye, K. Yearsley, S. Jones, and S. H. Barsky
The Lymphovascular Embolus of Inflammatory Breast Cancer Expresses a Stem Cell-Like Phenotype
Am. J. Pathol., August 1, 2008; 173(2): 561 - 574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
N. J. Maitland and A. T. Collins
Prostate Cancer Stem Cells: A New Target for Therapy
J. Clin. Oncol., June 10, 2008; 26(17): 2862 - 2870.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. E.P. Prince and L. E. Ailles
Cancer Stem Cells in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., June 10, 2008; 26(17): 2871 - 2875.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. Takaishi, T. Okumura, and T. C. Wang
Gastric Cancer Stem Cells
J. Clin. Oncol., June 10, 2008; 26(17): 2876 - 2882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. D. Peacock and D. N. Watkins
Cancer Stem Cells and the Ontogeny of Lung Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., June 10, 2008; 26(17): 2883 - 2889.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
L. S. Hart and W. S. El-Deiry
Invincible, but Not Invisible: Imaging Approaches Toward In Vivo Detection of Cancer Stem Cells
J. Clin. Oncol., June 10, 2008; 26(17): 2901 - 2910.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. Zhang, C. Balch, M. W. Chan, H.-C. Lai, D. Matei, J. M. Schilder, P. S. Yan, T. H-M. Huang, and K. P. Nephew
Identification and Characterization of Ovarian Cancer-Initiating Cells from Primary Human Tumors
Cancer Res., June 1, 2008; 68(11): 4311 - 4320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
L Ricci-Vitiani, A Pagliuca, E Palio, A Zeuner, and R De Maria
Colon cancer stem cells
Gut, April 1, 2008; 57(4): 538 - 548.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. Engelmann, H. Shen, and O. J. Finn
MCF7 Side Population Cells with Characteristics of Cancer Stem/Progenitor Cells Express the Tumor Antigen MUC1
Cancer Res., April 1, 2008; 68(7): 2419 - 2426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
M. Mimeault, P. P. Mehta, R. Hauke, and S. K. Batra
Functions of Normal and Malignant Prostatic Stem/Progenitor Cells in Tissue Regeneration and Cancer Progression and Novel Targeting Therapies
Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2008; 29(2): 234 - 252.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vet PatholHome page
M. M. Bera, D. N. R. Veeramachaneni, and K. Pandher
Characterization of a Biphasic Neoplasm in a Madagascar Tree Boa (Sanzinia madagascariensis)
Vet. Pathol., March 1, 2008; 45(2): 259 - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Wang, Y. Shiozawa, J. Wang, Y. Wang, Y. Jung, K. J. Pienta, R. Mehra, R. Loberg, and R. S. Taichman
The Role of CXCR7/RDC1 as a Chemokine Receptor for CXCL12/SDF-1 in Prostate Cancer
J. Biol. Chem., February 15, 2008; 283(7): 4283 - 4294.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. Liu, C. Ginestier, E. Charafe-Jauffret, H. Foco, C. G. Kleer, S. D. Merajver, G. Dontu, and M. S. Wicha
BRCA1 regulates human mammary stem/progenitor cell fate
PNAS, February 5, 2008; 105(5): 1680 - 1685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
P. B Dirks
Brain tumour stem cells: the undercurrents of human brain cancer and their relationship to neural stem cells
Phil Trans R Soc B, January 12, 2008; 363(1489): 139 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
F. Zeppernick, R. Ahmadi, B. Campos, C. Dictus, B. M. Helmke, N. Becker, P. Lichter, A. Unterberg, B. Radlwimmer, and C. C. Herold-Mende
Stem Cell Marker CD133 Affects Clinical Outcome in Glioma Patients
Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2008; 14(1): 123 - 129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
C. Tang, B. T. Ang, and S. Pervaiz
Cancer stem cell: target for anti-cancer therapy
FASEB J, December 1, 2007; 21(14): 3777 - 3785.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Cancer ResHome page
T. Reiner, A. de las Pozas, R. Parrondo, and C. Perez-Stable
Progression of Prostate Cancer from a Subset of p63-Positive Basal Epithelial Cells in FG/Tag Transgenic Mice
Mol. Cancer Res., November 1, 2007; 5(11): 1171 - 1179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. E. Kern and D. Shibata
The Fuzzy Math of Solid Tumor Stem Cells: A Perspective
Cancer Res., October 1, 2007; 67(19): 8985 - 8988.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
M. Mimeault and S. K. Batra
Interplay of distinct growth factors during epithelial mesenchymal transition of cancer progenitor cells and molecular targeting as novel cancer therapies
Ann. Onc., October 1, 2007; 18(10): 1605 - 1619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
H. Jiang, C. Gomez-Manzano, H. Aoki, M. M. Alonso, S. Kondo, F. McCormick, J. Xu, Y. Kondo, B. N. Bekele, H. Colman, et al.
Examination of the Therapeutic Potential of Delta-24-RGD in Brain Tumor Stem Cells: Role of Autophagic Cell Death
J Natl Cancer Inst, September 19, 2007; 99(18): 1410 - 1414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
J. T. Buijs, C. A. Rentsch, G. van der Horst, P. G.M. van Overveld, A. Wetterwald, R. Schwaninger, N. V. Henriquez, P. ten Dijke, F. Borovecki, R. Markwalder, et al.
BMP7, a Putative Regulator of Epithelial Homeostasis in the Human Prostate, Is a Potent Inhibitor of Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis in Vivo
Am. J. Pathol., September 1, 2007; 171(3): 1047 - 1057.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
L. Patrawala, T. Calhoun-Davis, R. Schneider-Broussard, and D. G. Tang
Hierarchical Organization of Prostate Cancer Cells in Xenograft Tumors: The CD44+{alpha}2{beta}1+ Cell Population Is Enriched in Tumor-Initiating Cells
Cancer Res., July 15, 2007; 67(14): 6796 - 6805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
D. Yu, X. Sun, Y. Qiu, J. Zhou, Y. Wu, L. Zhuang, J. Chen, and Y. Ding
Identification and Clinical Significance of Mobilized Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Tumor Vasculogenesis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2007; 13(13): 3814 - 3824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C. V. Pfenninger, T. Roschupkina, F. Hertwig, D. Kottwitz, E. Englund, J. Bengzon, S. E. Jacobsen, and U. A. Nuber
CD133 Is Not Present on Neurogenic Astrocytes in the Adult Subventricular Zone, but on Embryonic Neural Stem Cells, Ependymal Cells, and Glioblastoma Cells
Cancer Res., June 15, 2007; 67(12): 5727 - 5736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
G. Gu, J. Yuan, M. Wills, and S. Kasper
Prostate Cancer Cells with Stem Cell Characteristics Reconstitute the Original Human Tumor In vivo
Cancer Res., May 15, 2007; 67(10): 4807 - 4815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
G. Farnie, R. B. Clarke, K. Spence, N. Pinnock, K. Brennan, N. G. Anderson, and N. J. Bundred
Novel Cell Culture Technique for Primary Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Role of Notch and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Signaling Pathways
J Natl Cancer Inst, April 18, 2007; 99(8): 616 - 627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. Wang, L.-P. Guo, L.-Z. Chen, Y.-X. Zeng, and S. H. Lu
Identification of Cancer Stem Cell-Like Side Population Cells in Human Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cell Line
Cancer Res., April 15, 2007; 67(8): 3716 - 3724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. Miki, B. Furusato, H. Li, Y. Gu, H. Takahashi, S. Egawa, I. A. Sesterhenn, D. G. McLeod, S. Srivastava, and J. S. Rhim
Identification of Putative Stem Cell Markers, CD133 and CXCR4, in hTERT-Immortalized Primary Nonmalignant and Malignant Tumor-Derived Human Prostate Epithelial Cell Lines and in Prostate Cancer Specimens
Cancer Res., April 1, 2007; 67(7): 3153 - 3161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
C. M. Flynn and D. S. Kaufman
Donor cell leukemia: insight into cancer stem cells and the stem cell niche
Blood, April 1, 2007; 109(7): 2688 - 2692.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
M. Mimeault, S. L. Johansson, G. Vankatraman, E. Moore, J.-P. Henichart, P. Depreux, M.-F. Lin, and S. K. Batra
Combined targeting of epidermal growth factor receptor and hedgehog signaling by gefitinib and cyclopamine cooperatively improves the cytotoxic effects of docetaxel on metastatic prostate cancer cells
Mol. Cancer Ther., March 1, 2007; 6(3): 967 - 978.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
T. M. Phillips, W. H. McBride, and F. Pajonk
The Response of CD24-/low/CD44+ Breast Cancer-Initiating Cells to Radiation
J Natl Cancer Inst, December 20, 2006; 98(24): 1777 - 1785.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
S. Bruno, B. Bussolati, C. Grange, F. Collino, M. E. Graziano, U. Ferrando, and G. Camussi
CD133+ Renal Progenitor Cells Contribute to Tumor Angiogenesis
Am. J. Pathol., December 1, 2006; 169(6): 2223 - 2235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. Perk, I. Gil-Bazo, Y. Chin, P. de Candia, J. J.S. Chen, Y. Zhao, S. Chao, W. Cheong, Y. Ke, H. Al-Ahmadie, et al.
Reassessment of Id1 Protein Expression in Human Mammary, Prostate, and Bladder Cancers Using a Monospecific Rabbit Monoclonal Anti-Id1 Antibody.
Cancer Res., November 15, 2006; 66(22): 10870 - 10877.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
P. O. Sakariassen, L. Prestegarden, J. Wang, K.-O. Skaftnesmo, R. Mahesparan, C. Molthoff, P. Sminia, E. Sundlisaeter, A. Misra, B. B. Tysnes, et al.
Angiogenesis-independent tumor growth mediated by stem-like cancer cells
PNAS, October 31, 2006; 103(44): 16466 - 16471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
I. V. Litvinov, D. J. Vander Griend, Y. Xu, L. Antony, S. L. Dalrymple, and J. T. Isaacs
Low-Calcium Serum-Free Defined Medium Selects for Growth of Normal Prostatic Epithelial Stem Cells.
Cancer Res., September 1, 2006; 66(17): 8598 - 8607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C. L. Hall, J. Dai, K. L. van Golen, E. T. Keller, and M. W. Long
Type I Collagen Receptor ({alpha}2{beta}1) Signaling Promotes the Growth of Human Prostate Cancer Cells within the Bone.
Cancer Res., September 1, 2006; 66(17): 8648 - 8654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
N. Mehra, M. Penning, J. Maas, L. V. Beerepoot, N. van Daal, C. H. van Gils, R. H. Giles, and E. E. Voest
Progenitor Marker CD133 mRNA Is Elevated in Peripheral Blood of Cancer Patients with Bone Metastases.
Clin. Cancer Res., August 15, 2006; 12(16): 4859 - 4866.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
A. F. Hezel, A. C. Kimmelman, B. Z. Stanger, N. Bardeesy, and R. A. DePinho
Genetics and biology of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Genes & Dev., May 15, 2006; 20(10): 1218 - 1249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IBMS BoneKEyHome page
G. J. Strewler
The Stem Cell Niche and Bone Metastasis
IBMS BoneKEy, May 1, 2006; 3(5): 19 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
K. J. Pienta and D. Bradley
Mechanisms underlying the development of androgen-independent prostate cancer.
Clin. Cancer Res., March 15, 2006; 12(6): 1665 - 1671.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Collins, A. T.
Right arrow Articles by Maitland, N. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Collins, A. T.
Right arrow Articles by Maitland, N. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online