Cancer Research The Future of Cancer Research: Science and Patient Impact Translational Medicine Conference in Israel
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cross, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sinha, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cross, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sinha, R.
[Cancer Research 65, 11779-11784, December 15, 2005]
© 2005 American Association for Cancer Research

Epidemiology and Prevention

A Prospective Study of Meat and Meat Mutagens and Prostate Cancer Risk

Amanda J. Cross1, Ulrike Peters2, Victoria A. Kirsh3, Gerald L. Andriole4, Douglas Reding5, Richard B. Hayes1 and Rashmi Sinha1

1 Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland; 2 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; 3 Division of Preventive Oncology, Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 4 Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri; and 5 Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, Marshfield, Wisconsin

Requests for reprints: Amanda J. Cross, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, 6120 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852. Phone: 301-496-4378; Fax: 301-496-6829; E-mail: crossa{at}mail.nih.gov.


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
High-temperature cooked meat contains heterocyclic amines, including 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP), and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, such as benzo(a)pyrene (BaP). In rodents, a high intake of PhIP induces prostate tumors. We prospectively investigated the association between meat and meat mutagens, specifically PhIP, and prostate cancer risk in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial. Diet was assessed using a 137-item food frequency questionnaire and a detailed meat-cooking questionnaire linked to a database for BaP and the heterocyclic amines 2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo[4,5-b]quinoxaline (MeIQx), 2-amino-3,4,8-trimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline (DiMeIQx), and PhIP. During follow-up, we ascertained a total of 1,338 prostate cancer cases among 29,361 men; of these, 868 were incident cases (diagnosed after the first year of follow-up) and 520 were advanced cases (stage III or IV or a Gleason score of ≥7). Total, red, or white meat intake was not associated with prostate cancer risk. More than 10 g/d of very well done meat, compared with no consumption, was associated with a 1.4-fold increased risk of prostate cancer [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.05-1.92] and a 1.7-fold increased risk (95% CI, 1.19-2.40) of incident disease. Although there was no association with MeIQx and DiMeIQx, the highest quintile of PhIP was associated with a 1.2-fold increased risk of prostate cancer (95% CI, 1.01-1.48) and a 1.3-fold increased risk of incident disease (95% CI, 1.01-1.61). In conclusion, very well done meat was positively associated with prostate cancer risk. In addition, this study lends epidemiologic support to the animal studies, which have implicated PhIP as a prostate carcinogen. (Cancer Res 2005; 65(24): 11779-84)


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Studies of twins show that up to 50% of prostate cancer cases may be explained by environmental factors, such as diet (1). Meat and fat have generated interest as potential risk factors for this disease, although results from epidemiologic studies have been inconsistent (2). Meat cooked at high temperatures is a source of carcinogenic heterocyclic amines (HCA) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH). The formation of HCAs and PAHs depends on the meat type and is highest in meats cooked by high-temperature cooking methods, such as barbecuing, and in well-done meats (3–6).

One of the most abundant HCAs in cooked meat is 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP). PhIP increases mutation frequency in the rat prostate (7) and induces prostate tumors in rodent models (8), whereas other HCAs do not (9). Several enzymes required for the metabolic activation of HCAs, including cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2), CYP1B1, N-acetyl-transferase 1 (NAT1), and NAT2, are expressed in human prostate tissue (10–12). Furthermore, CYP1A2 is inducible by dietary components, including diets rich in HCAs (13). The data regarding PhIP and prostate cancer risk in humans are limited to one case-control study of 317 cases, which found no association (14).

The aims of this study were to determine whether meat intake or meat-related mutagens, particularly PhIP, was associated with increased prostate cancer risk.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Study population. This study was conducted in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial, a randomized controlled, multisite study (Birmingham, AL; Denver, CO; Detroit, MI; Honolulu, HI; Marshfield, WI; Minneapolis, MN; Pittsburgh, PA; Salt Lake City, UT; St Louis, MO; and Washington, DC) to evaluate selected methods for the early detection of these four cancers (15). Biological samples and questionnaire data were collected to study markers of early detection and etiology of cancer (16).

Between 1993 and 2001, 38,352 men (ages 55-74 years) were randomized to the screening arm of the Trial. At entry, men receive a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test and digital rectal exam (DRE) for prostate cancer screening and then both PSA and DRE annually for the subsequent 5 and 3 years, respectively. Men with a PSA test result of >4 ng/mL or DRE exam suspicious for prostate cancer are referred to their medical care providers for follow-up. All participants are asked to complete annual questionnaires regarding cancer diagnoses during the previous year.

Participants were ineligible for this study of meat and meat mutagens if they had a history of cancer (other than nonmelanoma skin cancer; n = 1,006); did not have prostate cancer screening results (n = 2,530); lacked any of the following three questionnaires: annual follow-up (n = 1,046), baseline risk factor (n = 250), or food frequency questionnaire (FFQ; n = 6,604); missed more than seven items on their FFQ (n = 250); or were extreme outliers for reported energy intake (those in the top or bottom 1% of intake, n = 634). After exclusions (some individuals for multiple reasons), the cohort consisted of 29,361 men. As the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial is an ongoing randomized clinical trial continuing through 2015, data regarding person-years are not presented in this article.

The study was approved by the institutional review board of the U.S. National Cancer Institute and the Trial screening centers. Written informed consent was obtained from each study participant.

Identification of prostate cancer cases. The PLCO Trial obtains medical/pathologic records for all reported cancer cases and death certificates for all deceased individuals. All prostate cancer cases were pathologically confirmed. Incident prostate cancer cases were defined as those diagnosed after the first year of follow-up; therefore, for incident-based analyses, cancers diagnosed within the first year of follow-up were excluded. Tumors classified as stage III or IV according to the tumor-node-metastasis staging of disease classification (ref. 17; based on clinical and, when carried out, surgical findings) or tumors assigned a Gleason score of ≥7 (from either biopsy or prostatectomy, whichever gave the highest value) were considered to be advanced prostate cancer cases. Analyses of advanced prostate cancer included all individuals diagnosed with advanced disease from baseline to the end of follow-up.

Assessment of diet and lifestyle. Upon entry to the study, participants completed a general risk factor questionnaire and a self-administered FFQ (http://www3.cancer.gov/prevention/plco), which asked about the frequency of consumption and portion size of 137 food items during the previous year. Sex- and age-specific portion size and nutrient values were quantified (18). The FFQ included detailed information about meat-cooking methods (barbequing, grilling, pan frying, and broiling) and doneness level (rare, medium, well done, or very well done) for meats commonly cooked by different methods to varying degrees of doneness (steak, bacon, sausage, pork chop, and hamburgers). We used a specifically developed database (http://charred.cancer.gov/) to estimate daily intake of meat mutagens, including the following HCAs: 2-amino-3,4,8-trimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline (DiMeIQx), 2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline (MeIQx), and PhIP and the PAH benzo(a)pyrene (BaP; refs. 4–6, 19). This database also enabled the determination of overall mutagenic activity in meat, with values determined by the standard plate incorporation assay with Salmonella typhimurium strain TA98, measured as revertant colonies (20).

Statistical analysis. Cox proportional hazards regression, with age as the underlying time metric, was used to estimate relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for prostate cancer. Relative risks are reported within quintiles, using the first quintile as the referent category. Tests for linear trend used the median value of each quintile. All reported Ps are two sided. The models were adjusted for race (non-Hispanic White, Black, Asian/Pacific Islander, other), study center (10 indicator variables), family history of prostate cancer (yes/no), body mass index (<25, 25 to <30, ≥30), smoking status (never, current, former, pipe/cigar only), physical activity (hours spent in vigorous activity per week: none, <1, 1, 2, 3, ≥4), total energy intake (kcal/d), supplemental vitamin E use (IU/d: 0, 0-30, >30-400, >400, past use), lycopene intake (µg/d), history of diabetes (yes/no), aspirin use (never, <1/d, ≥1/d), and total number of screening exams during follow-up (as a time-dependent variable).


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
During follow-up, a total of 1,338 prostate cancer cases were diagnosed, of which 868 were incident cases and 520 were advanced cases. In addition, 9% of the cohort died or were lost to follow-up. The study population was predominately non-Hispanic White (90.7%) followed by Asian/Pacific Islander (4.0%), Black (3.3%), and Hispanic/American Indian/Alaskan (1.9%). Compared with men in the lowest quintile of red meat intake, men in the highest quintile tended to be younger, more likely to be obese, to have a higher total energy intake, to consume more lycopene, and less likely to use vitamin E supplements (Table 1). High red meat consumers also exercised less, ate less fruits and vegetables, and were more likely to be current smokers (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1. Mean values for selected characteristics by quintiles of red meat intake

 
There was no association between red or white meat consumption, meat-cooking method (Table 2), or for meats cooked rare, medium, or well done (data not shown) and risk of total prostate cancer, incident cancer, or advanced disease. The frequency and range of consumption of very well done meat, which contains the highest levels of meat-related mutagens (5, 6), was too small to analyze in quintiles. Considered in three categories, split by the median level of intake (nonconsumers, ≤10 g/d, >10 g/d), there was an elevated risk for total prostate cancer (RR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.05-1.92; Ptrend = 0.02) and for incident disease (RR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.19-2.40; Ptrend = 0.003), comparing men who consumed >10 g/d to nonconsumers. However, no clear association was evident for advanced disease (RR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.73-2.06; Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 2. Distribution and RR with 95% CIs for prostate cancer risk according to quintiles of meat and meat-cooking variables

 
Processed meat consumption was not associated with overall prostate cancer risk or incident disease (Table 2). The risk of advanced cancer, however, was elevated in those in the highest four quintiles of consumption, although there was no evidence of a dose-response trend (Ptrend = 0.32).

PhIP intake was associated with an increased risk for overall prostate cancer (highest versus lowest quintile RR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.01-1.48; Ptrend = 0.04) and incident disease (highest versus lowest quintile RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.01-1.61; Ptrend = 0.01), although there was no association between PhIP and advanced disease (highest versus lowest quintile RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.78-1.43; Ptrend = 0.59) (Table 3). DiMeIQx, MeIQx, and BaP intake or overall mutagenic activity from meat was not associated with prostate cancer risk. Correlations show that PhIP was weakly correlated with red meat (r = 0.15, P < 0.001) and very well done meat consumption (r = 0.16, P = <0.001) and had slightly higher correlations with MeIQx (r = 0.22, P < 0.001) and DiMeIQx (r = 0.37, P < 0.001).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 3. Distribution and RRs with 95% CIs for prostate cancer risk according to quintiles of HCAs and BaP

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
In this cohort study, consumption of >10 g/d of very well done meat was associated with a 42% increased risk for prostate cancer and a 69% increased risk for incident disease. Furthermore, a high PhIP intake was associated with a 22% increased risk for prostate cancer and a 28% increased risk for incident disease.

Previous cohort studies have yielded conflicting results with regard to red meat and prostate cancer risk, with some studies suggesting a positive association (21–24), whereas others have found no association (25, 26). The results from this study do not support the hypothesis that red meat intake per se is a risk factor for prostate cancer.

The one previous epidemiologic study of HCAs and prostate cancer, a population-based case-control study of 317 cases in New Zealand, found that individuals who consumed well-done beef steak had a 1.7-fold (95% CI, 1.02-2.77; Ptrend = 0.03) increased risk of prostate cancer compared with those who did not consume well-done beef steak. This case-control study did not, however, find an association between prostate cancer and HCAs, including PhIP (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.70-1.59); nevertheless, consideration must be given to the study's size and the retrospective design (14).

The mean intakes of the three HCAs and BaP investigated in our study were similar to those reported previously from western populations (27–29). Although HCAs are formed in the highest concentrations in very well done meats cooked by high-temperature cooking methods, the correlation between PhIP and very well done meat was not particularly high (r = 0.16). The frequency of consumption of very well done meats is generally low; therefore, the majority of PhIP intake derives from less well done meats that are more frequently consumed. In our study population, the main source of PhIP was barbecued chicken (54%), with smaller contributions from broiled and fried chicken (17%), steak cooked to a medium level of doneness (26%) and well-done hamburgers (2%).

The lack of association with DiMeIQx, MeIQx, and BaP is in agreement with much of the animal literature, which also finds risks specifically associated with PhIP (7, 8). There are several lines of evidence to support the notion that PhIP may increase prostate cancer risk. In contrast to the majority of HCAs, PhIP targets the prostate tissues (30). Furthermore, PhIP is the most abundant HCA, one of the most readily absorbed mutagenic HCAs found in cooked meat (31) and has the highest carcinogenic potential of the HCAs (32). In rodents, PhIP increases mutation frequency in prostate tissue (7) and when administered in the diet, yields a high number of rodent prostate cancers (8).

Studies conducted with human tissue complement the animal data. Human prostate tissue is known to express CYP and NAT enzymes (10–12), which metabolically activate HCAs, leading to increased DNA adduct levels in response to PhIP (33). In addition, treatment of primary cell cultures from human prostate tissue with PhIP results in dose-dependent genotoxic damage (34, 35).

The mechanism of PhIP induced prostate cancer is uncertain. In addition to its direct mutagenic activity, animal experiments have identified similarities between PhIP and estradiol, both of which have been associated with cancers of the prostate (30, 36). In rodents, PhIP exhibits estrogenic activity, potentially through sex steroid receptor binding, whereas other HCAs, such as MeIQx, do not (37, 38). Furthermore, PhIP, at levels equivalent to those encountered in the human diet, and estradiol both result in increased cell proliferation in vitro and have other similar mitogenic responses (38).

The strengths of this study include the detailed information on screening procedures that could be used to control for screening frequency (39) and also the detailed information on meat and meat-cooking practices, which enabled the determination of HCA and BaP intake. Consideration must be given, however, to the measurement error and associated attenuation of risks inherent to dietary studies based on questionnaire data. Although the FFQ had very specific and detailed questions on meat intake and meat-cooking practices, derived from a validated questionnaire (29), we did not consider marinating of meat or flipping of hamburgers, both of which can affect the formation of HCAs and BaP (40, 41). Although we considered a large number of potential confounders, prostate cancer is a disease with few known risk factors; therefore, we cannot be sure that we identified all confounding variables.

In conclusion, the results of this prospective study found that a high intake of very well done meat and a high intake of PhIP were both positively associated with prostate cancer risk, lending epidemiologic support to experimental observations. If confirmed in further studies, PhIP would be the first chemical carcinogen associated with prostate cancer in human studies.


   Acknowledgments
 
Grant support: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Cancer Institute/NIH grant (PLCO Cancer Screening Trial) and Intramural Research Program.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Received 6/22/05. Revised 9/ 6/05. Accepted 9/29/05.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Lichtenstein P, Holm NV, Verkasalo PK, et al. Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer: analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. N Engl J Med 2000;343:78–85.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Kolonel LN. Fat, meat, and prostate cancer. Epidemiol Rev 2001;23:72–81.[Free Full Text]
  3. Skog K. Cooking procedures and food mutagens: a literature review. Food Chem Toxicol 1993;31:655–75.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Sinha R, Rothman N, Brown ED, et al. High concentrations of the carcinogen 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo- [4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP) occur in chicken but are dependent on the cooking method. Cancer Res 1995;55:4516–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Sinha R, Rothman N, Salmon CP, et al. Heterocyclic amine content in beef cooked by different methods to varying degrees of doneness and gravy made from meat drippings. Food Chem Toxicol 1998;36:279–87.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Sinha R, Knize MG, Salmon CP, et al. Heterocyclic amine content of pork products cooked by different methods and to varying degrees of doneness. Food Chem Toxicol 1998;36:289–97.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Stuart GR, Holcroft J, de Boer JG, Glickman BW. Prostate mutations in rats induced by the suspected human carcinogen 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine. Cancer Res 2000;60:266–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Shirai T, Sano M, Tamano S, et al. The prostate:a target for carcinogenicity of 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP) derived from cooked foods. Cancer Res 1997;57:195–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. IARC. Some naturally occurring substances: food items and constituents, heterocyclic aromatic amines and mycotoxins. Vol 56. France: Lyon; 1993.
  10. Williams JA, Martin FL, Muir GH, Hewer A, Grover PL, Phillips DH. Metabolic activation of carcinogens and expression of various cytochromes P450 in human prostate tissue. Carcinogenesis 2000;21:1683–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Wang CY, Debiec-Rychter M, Schut HA, et al. N-acetyltransferase expression and DNA binding of N-hydroxyheterocyclic amines in human prostate epithelium. Carcinogenesis 1999;20:1591–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Agundez JA, Martinez C, Olivera M, et al. Expression in human prostate of drug- and carcinogen-metabolizing enzymes: association with prostate cancer risk. Br J Cancer 1998;78:1361–7.[Medline]
  13. Sinha R, Rothman N, Brown ED, et al. Pan-fried meat containing high levels of heterocyclic aromatic amines but low levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons induces cytochrome P4501A2 activity in humans. Cancer Res 1994;54:6154–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Norrish AE, Ferguson LR, Knize MG, Felton JS, Sharpe SJ, Jackson RT. Heterocyclic amine content of cooked meat and risk of prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91:2038–44.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Gohagan JK, Prorok PC, Hayes RB, Kramer BS. The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial of the National Cancer Institute: history, organization, and status. Control Clin Trials 2000;21:251–72S.
  16. Hayes RB, Sigurdson A, Moore L, et al. Methods for etiologic and early marker investigations in the PLCO trial. Mutat Res. Epub 2005 Jul 26.
  17. American Joint Committee on Cancer. Prostate. In: AJCC cancer staging manual. 6th ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2002: pp. 309–16.
  18. Subar AF, Midthune D, Kulldorff M, et al. Evaluation of alternative approaches to assign nutrient values to food groups in food frequency questionnaires. Am J Epidemiol 2000;152:279–86.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Knize MG, Sinha R, Rothman N, et al. Heterocyclic amine content in fast-food meat products. Food Chem Toxicol 1995;33:545–51.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Ames BN, McCann J, Yamasaki E. Methods for detecting carcinogens and mutagens with the Salmonella/mammalian-microsome mutagenicity test. Mutat Res 1975;31:347–64.[Medline]
  21. Veierod MB, Laake P, Thelle DS. Dietary fat intake and risk of prostate cancer: a prospective study of 25,708 Norwegian men. Int J Cancer 1997;73:634–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Giovannucci E, Rimm EB, Colditz GA, et al. A prospective study of dietary fat and risk of prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:1571–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Le Marchand L, Kolonel LN, Wilkens LR, Myers BC, Hirohata T. Animal fat consumption and prostate cancer: a prospective study in Hawaii. Epidemiology 1994;5:276–82.[Medline]
  24. Gann PH, Hennekens CH, Sacks FM, Grodstein F, Giovannucci EL, Stampfer MJ. Prospective study of plasma fatty acids and risk of prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1994;86:281–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Hirayama T. Epidemiology of prostate cancer with special reference to the role of diet. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1979;53:149–55.
  26. Hsing AW, McLaughlin JK, Schuman LM, et al. Diet, tobacco use, and fatal prostate cancer: results from the Lutheran Brotherhood Cohort Study. Cancer Res 1990;50:6836–40.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Sinha R, Kulldorff M, Swanson CA, Curtin J, Brownson RC, Alavanja MC. Dietary heterocyclic amines and the risk of lung cancer among Missouri women. Cancer Res 2000;60:3753–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Sinha R, Kulldorff M, Chow WH, Denobile J, Rothman N. Dietary intake of heterocyclic amines, meat-derived mutagenic activity, and risk of colorectal adenomas. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2001;10:559–62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Cantwell M, Mittl B, Curtin J, et al. Relative validity of a food frequency questionnaire with a meat-cooking and heterocyclic amine module. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004;13:293–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Sugimura T, Nagao M, Wakabayashi K. Carcinogenicity of food mutagens. Environ Health Perspect 1996;104 Suppl 3:429–33.
  31. Lynch AM, Knize MG, Boobis AR, Gooderham NJ, Davies DS, Murray S. Intra- and interindividual variability in systemic exposure in humans to 2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline and 2-amino-1-methyl- 6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine, carcinogens present in cooked beef. Cancer Res 1992;52:6216–23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Layton DW, Bogen KT, Knize MG, Hatch FT, Johnson VM, Felton JS. Cancer risk of heterocyclic amines in cooked foods: an analysis and implications for research. Carcinogenesis 1995;16:39–52.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Cui L, Takahashi S, Tada M, et al. Immunohistochemical detection of carcinogen-DNA adducts in normal human prostate tissues transplanted into the subcutis of athymic nude mice: results with 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP) and 3,2'-dimethyl-4-aminobiphenyl (DMAB) and relation to cytochrome P450s and N-acetyltransferase activity. Jpn J Cancer Res 2000;91:52–8.[Medline]
  34. Martin FL, Cole KJ, Muir GH, et al. Primary cultures of prostate cells and their ability to activate carcinogens. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2002;5:96–104.[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Kooiman GG, Martin FL, Williams JA, Grover PL, Phillips DH, Muir GH. The influence of dietary and environmental factors on prostate cancer risk. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2000;3:256–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Bonkhoff H, Fixemer T, Hunsicker I, Remberger K. Progesterone receptor expression in human prostate cancer: correlation with tumor progression. Prostate 2001;48:285–91.[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Lauber SN, Ali A, Gooderham NJ. The cooked food derived carcinogen 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP) is potently oestrogenic: a mechanistic basis for its tissue specific carcinogenicity. Carcinogenesis 2004.
  38. Gooderham NJ, Zhu H, Lauber S, Boyce A, Creton S. Molecular and genetic toxicology of 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP). Mutat Res 2002;506–507:91–9.
  39. Weiss NS. Adjusting for screening history in epidemiologic studies of cancer: why, when, and how to do it. Am J Epidemiol 2003;157:957–61.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Tran NL, Salmon CP, Knize MG, Colvin ME. Experimental and simulation studies of heat flow and heterocyclic amine mutagen/carcinogen formation in pan-fried meat patties. Food Chem Toxicol 2002;40:673–84.[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Salmon CP, Knize MG, Felton JS, Effects of marinating on heterocyclic amine carcinogen formation in grilled chicken. Food Chem Toxicol 1997;35:433–41.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
B. A. Rybicki, C. Neslund-Dudas, C. H. Bock, A. Rundle, A. T. Savera, J. J. Yang, N. L. Nock, and D. Tang
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon-DNA Adducts in Prostate and Biochemical Recurrence after Prostatectomy
Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2008; 14(3): 750 - 757.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. Koutros, A. J. Cross, D. P. Sandler, J. A. Hoppin, X. Ma, T. Zheng, M. C.R. Alavanja, and R. Sinha
Meat and Meat Mutagens and Risk of Prostate Cancer in the Agricultural Health Study
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2008; 17(1): 80 - 87.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
S. K. Creton, H. Zhu, and N. J. Gooderham
The Cooked Meat Carcinogen 2-Amino-1-Methyl-6-Phenylimidazo[4,5-b]Pyridine Activates the Extracellular Signal Regulated Kinase Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathway
Cancer Res., December 1, 2007; 67(23): 11455 - 11462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
R. J. Turesky, J.-M. Yuan, R. Wang, S. Peterson, and M. C. Yu
Tobacco Smoking and Urinary Levels of 2-Amino-9H-Pyrido[2,3-b]Indole in Men of Shanghai, China
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., August 1, 2007; 16(8): 1554 - 1560.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
D. Li, R. S. Day, M. L. Bondy, R. Sinha, N. T. Nguyen, D. B. Evans, J. L. Abbruzzese, and M. M. Hassan
Dietary Mutagen Exposure and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2007; 16(4): 655 - 661.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
D. Tang, J. J. Liu, A. Rundle, C. Neslund-Dudas, A. T. Savera, C. H. Bock, N. L. Nock, J. J. Yang, and B. A. Rybicki
Grilled Meat Consumption and PhIP-DNA Adducts in Prostate Carcinogenesis
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2007; 16(4): 803 - 808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
Y. Nakai, W. G. Nelson, and A. M. De Marzo
The Dietary Charred Meat Carcinogen 2-Amino-1-Methyl-6-Phenylimidazo[4,5-b]Pyridine Acts as Both a Tumor Initiator and Promoter in the Rat Ventral Prostate
Cancer Res., February 1, 2007; 67(3): 1378 - 1384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
N. J. Butcher, N. L. Tetlow, C. Cheung, G. M. Broadhurst, and R. F. Minchin
Induction of Human Arylamine N-Acetyltransferase Type I by Androgens in Human Prostate Cancer Cells
Cancer Res., January 1, 2007; 67(1): 85 - 92.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
S. J Weinstein, R. Stolzenberg-Solomon, P. Pietinen, P. R Taylor, J. Virtamo, and D. Albanes
Dietary factors of one-carbon metabolism and prostate cancer risk.
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2006; 84(4): 929 - 935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cross, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sinha, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cross, A. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sinha, R.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online