Cancer Research Targets Advances in Breast Cancer Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fiegl, H.
Right arrow Articles by Widschwendter, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fiegl, H.
Right arrow Articles by Widschwendter, M.
[Cancer Research 65, 1141-1145, February 15, 2005]
© 2005 American Association for Cancer Research

Priority Reports

Circulating Tumor-Specific DNA: A Marker for Monitoring Efficacy of Adjuvant Therapy in Cancer Patients

Heidi Fiegl1, Simone Millinger1, Elisabeth Mueller-Holzner1, Christian Marth1, Christian Ensinger2, Andreas Berger3, Helmut Klocker3, Georg Goebel4 and Martin Widschwendter1

Departments of 1 Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2 Pathology, 3 Urology, and 4 Biostatistics and Documentation, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria

Requests for reprints: Martin Widschwendter, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstrasse 35, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria. Phone: 43-512-504-81055; Fax: 43-512-504-23112; E-mail: Martin.Widschwendter{at}uibk.ac.at.


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Adjuvant systemic therapy (a strategy that targets potential disseminated tumor cells after complete removal of the tumor) has clearly improved survival of patients with cancer. To date, no tool is available to monitor efficacy of these therapies, unless distant metastases arise, a situation that unavoidably leads to death. We analyzed RASSF1A DNA methylation in pretherapeutic sera and serum samples collected 1 year after surgery from 148 patients with breast cancer who were receiving adjuvant tamoxifen; 19.6% and 22.3% of patients with breast cancer showed RASSF1A DNA methylation in their pretherapeutic and 1-year-after serum samples, respectively. RASSF1A methylation 1 year after primary surgery (and during adjuvant tamoxifen therapy) was an independent predictor of poor outcome, with a relative risk (95% confidence interval) for relapse of 5.1 (1.3-19.8) and for death of 6.9 (1.9-25.9). Measurement of serum DNA methylation allows adjuvant systemic treatment to be monitored for efficacy: disappearance of RASSF1A DNA methylation in serum throughout treatment with tamoxifen indicates a response, whereas persistence or new appearance means resistance to adjuvant tamoxifen treatment. It remains to be seen whether modifications made in adjuvant therapeutic strategies based on detection of circulating nucleic acids will improve survival as well as quality of life.

Key Words: Breast cancer • Tumor markers and detection of metastasis • DNA methylation/epigenetics • Clinical drug resistance • Molecular markers of metastasis and progression


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Breast cancer is the most frequent malignancy among women in the industrialized world. Although the presence or absence of metastatic involvement in the axillary lymph nodes is the most powerful prognostic factor available for patients with primary breast cancer (1), it is only an indirect measure reflecting the tendency of the tumor to spread. About 75% of breast cancers are hormone dependent, and the postoperative administration of tamoxifen reduces the risk of recurrence by 47% and reduces the risk of death by 26% (2). Tamoxifen is usually administered for 5 years to women with hormone receptor–positive breast cancers to target disseminated tumor cells. Recent evidence from large trials shows significant improvement of disease-free survival by administering letrozole or examestane, both aromatase inhibitors, after completing 5 or 2 to 3 years of standard tamoxifen treatment, respectively (3, 4); however, the absolute benefits are limited. For future secondary adjuvant treatment studies, a highly sensitive marker for tamoxifen-resistant circulating cells is urgently needed. Such a marker has to fulfill certain requirements: (a) absence in non–breast cancer patients, (b) easy availability and measurability in patients throughout follow-up period without discomfort or harm, (c) poor prognostic parameter in nonsystemically treated patients, and (d) identification of patients during adjuvant treatment who are nonresponsive to the endocrine therapy used.

In recent years, changes in the status of DNA methylation, known as epigenetic alterations, have turned out to be one of the most common molecular alterations in human neoplasia including breast cancer (5). In addition, numerous studies have shown tumor-specific alterations in DNA recovered from plasma or serum of patients with various malignancies, a finding that has potential for molecular diagnosis and prognosis (6–10). Very recently, we were able to detect a prognostic value for APC and RASSF1A methylation in pretherapeutic sera of patients with breast cancer (11). RASSF1A DNA methylation has consistently been shown to be a prognostic marker in patients who did not receive adjuvant therapy (11).

This study now shows that methylated RASSF1A DNA in serum is a surrogate marker for circulating breast cancer cells and that this cancer-specific DNA alteration allows monitoring of adjuvant therapy in patients with cancer: Disappearance of RASSF1A DNA methylation in serum throughout treatment with tamoxifen indicates a response, whereas persistence or new appearance means resistance to adjuvant tamoxifen treatment.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients. We studied pre- and posttherapeutic serum samples of 148 patients with breast cancer. Serum samples from our serum bank were recruited from all patients diagnosed with breast cancer between September 1992 and February 2002 who met all the following criteria: primary breast cancer without metastasis at diagnosis, tamoxifen treatment for a total of 5 years or upon relapse, availability of serum samples before treatment and 1 year after treatment (a time when the patient has received at least six monthly adjuvant treatments with tamoxifen 20 mg/d) and no relapse after 1 year (Supplementary Data). Patients were 37 to 88 years old (median age at diagnosis, 62 years). After a median follow-up (after the second serum draw) of 3.6 years (range, 0.2-9.7 years) and 4.0 years (range, 0.5-9.8 years), seven (4.7%) and eight (5.4%) patients had relapsed or died, respectively. Throughout the entire observation period, 13 (8.8%) and 15 (10.1%) patients relapsed or died, respectively. Hormone receptor status was determined by either radioligand binding assay or immunohistochemistry. In addition, serum samples from 154 patients with benign condition of the breast and from 93 patients with cervical cancer have been analyzed (Supplementary Data).

Serum Samples, DNA Isolation, and MethyLight Analysis. Patients' blood samples were drawn before or 1 year after therapeutic intervention. Blood was centrifuged at 2,000 x g for 10 minutes at room temperature, and 1-mL aliquots of serum samples were stored at –30°C.

DNA isolation, bisulfite modification, and MethyLight analysis was done as described recently (11).

Laser Capture Microdissection. The PixCell II LCM System (Arcturus Engineering, Mountain View, CA) was used for laser capture microdissection of paraffin-embedded tissues. Ten-micrometer-thick sections of 13 breast cancer patients with a ductal carcinoma in situ were used. For each analyzed fraction, 1,000 cells were "laser captured". DNA extraction was carried out using the Arcturus Pico Pure DNA extraction kit according to the manufacturers' instructions. DNA bisulfite modification and MethyLight analysis was done as described (11).

Statistics. We used Pearson's {chi}2 or, in the case of low frequencies per cell, Fisher's exact method to test associations between categorically clinicopathologic features and methylation measures. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to assess differences between nonparametric distributed variables. Relapse-free and overall survival were calculated from the date of second serum draw (1 year after diagnosis) to the date of relapse or death or last follow-up. Relapse-free and overall survival curves were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate analysis of overall survival according to clinicopathologic factors [tumor stage, grading, nodal status, menopausal status, and hormone receptor status (estrogen and/or progesterone receptor positivity)], and pretherapeutic and 1-year-after serum RASSF1A DNA methylation was done using a two-sided log rank test.

Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to estimate the predictive effect of methylated serum RASSF1A DNA.

A P value <0.05 was considered a statistically significant difference. All statistical analyses were done using SPSS Software 10.0 (Chicago, IL).


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
RASSF1A DNA Methylation in Laser Capture Microdissected Breast Cancer Cells. The rationale for supposing RASSF1A methylation as a DNA-based marker for breast cancer cells was based on our previous finding that 98.6% of 148 analyzed breast cancer specimens showed RASSF1A DNA methylation (12) and that RASSF1A methylation in pretherapeutic serum samples of patients with breast cancer who did not receive any systemic adjuvant therapy was an independent poor prognostic marker (11).

To determine whether RASSF1A DNA methylation acts as a DNA-based marker solely for breast cancer cells but not for other breast- and/or tumor-associated cells, we did laser-assisted microdissection of 13 paraffin-embedded specimens that had been removed due to hormone receptor–positive carcinoma in situ. RASSF1A methylation was detected in all cancer cell fractions, whereas most of the underlying stroma, the nonneoplastic breast epithelium, or the adjacent stroma were negative for RASSF1A methylation (Fig. 1).



View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Figure 1. RASSF1A methylation in microdissected cells. A, tumor and nonneoplastic epithelial cells before and after microdissection. Original magnification, x40. B, overview of RASSF1A methylation status in tumor and nonneoplastic tissue. +, RASSF1A methylated; –, RASSF1A not methylated; n.d., not determined, because no DNA could be extracted.

 
RASSF1A DNA Methylation in Serum of Non–Breast Cancer Patients. To assess whether RASSF1A DNA methylation in serum is a breast cancer–specific marker, we analyzed pretherapeutic sera from non–breast cancer: RASSF1A DNA methylation was detectable in pretherapeutic serum samples from only 11 (7.1%) of 154 and 5 (5.4%) of 93 patients with benign conditions of breast and primary cervical cancer, respectively. The majority of control patients with RASSF1A methylation in their serum either were postmenopausal or had an advanced cervical cancer (Supplementary Data). These findings substantiate the conjecture that RASSF1A methylation in serum is a specific marker for circulating breast cancer cells.

RASSF1A DNA Methylation in Serum of Patients with Primary Breast Cancer Who Received Adjuvant Tamoxifen Treatment. In this retrospective approach we used prospectively collected serum samples from patients who received tamoxifen for adjuvant treatment due to primary nonmetastatic breast cancer, who had pretherapeutic as well as serum samples drawn 1 year after diagnosis (i.e., >6 months after start of tamoxifen therapy) and who showed no relapse within the first year after diagnosis or at second serum draw. A total of 19.6% and 22.3% of patients showed RASSF1A DNA methylation in their pretherapeutic and 1-year-after serum samples, respectively. Pretherapeutic RASSF1A methylation showed nearly the same associations with clinicopathologic parameters as described earlier for a different set of patients (11) and was correlated with tumor size, menopausal status (Supplementary Data), and age [median age: RASSF1A unmethylated (59.7 years; range, 36.9-88.4); RASSF1A methylated (67.6 years; range, 45.8-85.3; P = 0.006)]. RASSF1A DNA methylation at second serum draw after 1 year (Supplementary Data) was associated only with age [median age: RASSF1A unmethylated (61.3 years; range, 37.8-86.1); RASSF1A methylated (67.4 years; range, 45.2-89.6; P = 0.047)].

Prognostic Significance of Clinicopathologic Features and Pretherapeutic RASSF1A DNA Methylation in Serum. Tumor size as well as lymph node metastasis were poor prognostic parameters for relapse-free as well as for overall survival, whereas tumor grade had a statistically significant effect on relapse-free survival (Table 1A and B). Neither menopausal status, hormone receptor status, nor pretherapeutic RASSF1A DNA methylation in serum had an impact on prognosis (Table 1A and B).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 1. Results of univariate analysis for relapse-free and overall survival

 
Early Identification of Patients Who Are Nonresponsive to Adjuvant Tamoxifen. About 1 year (1.04 ± 0.11 years) after primary diagnosis of breast cancer (after patients were on tamoxifen 20 mg daily for at least 6 months), a second serum draw was done. Serum RASSF1A DNA methylation at that time indicated poor relapse-free as well as overall survival (Table 1A and B). To test whether serum RASSF1A DNA methylation is an independent predictor of nonresponsiveness to tamoxifen, we used Cox multiple-regression analysis that included tumor size, grade, lymph node metastasis, menopausal status, hormone receptor status, and additional adjuvant chemotherapy. Besides tumor size, methylated RASSF1A serum DNA was strongly associated with poor outcome, with a relative risk for relapse of 5.1 (Table 2A). The only predictor for poor overall survival was RASSF1A serum DNA methylation, with a relative risk for death of 6.9 (Table 2B). To assess which patients might profit from adjuvant tamoxifen treatment and which should be offered an alternative therapy to prevent relapse and/or death from breast cancer, we grouped patients into three categories according to RASSF1A DNA methylation in pretherapeutic and 1-year-after serum: (a) primary positive that switched to negative after 1 year, (b) always negative, and (c) positive after 1 year, irrespective of primary methylation status. Despite no difference in the follow-up period or any other clinicopathologic feature or treatment modality, 0% and 21% of patients relapsed and 5% and 24% of patients died in the "Pos -> Neg" and "Finally Pos" groups, respectively (Fig. 2). With regard to survival, no statistically significant difference between the "Pos -> Neg" and "Always Neg" groups was observed (Fig. 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 2. Results of multivariate analysis for relapse-free and overall survival

 


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Figure 2. Survival and changes in RASSF1A DNA methylation status. Relapse-free (A) and overall survival (B) according to RASSF1A methylation status in serum that switched from positive to negative, stayed always negative, or was finally positive after 1 year of tamoxifen treatment. C, characteristics of those patients according to the RASSF1A methylation status.

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
To date there has been no target to assess whether a patient will truly profit from adjuvant therapy after tumor removal. We therefore sought a simple tool to indicate "tumor activity" that is nonresponsive to a patient's current systemic therapy. To our knowledge, no systemic marker for monitoring adjuvant treatment in patients with breast cancer has yet been established.

During recent years, some studies have reported cell-free DNA in serum/plasma of patients with breast cancer at diagnosis (7, 11, 13, 14). This article shows that RASSF1A DNA methylation is present in nearly all breast cancer cells and is rare in serum of patients with nonneoplastic breast conditions or patients with other invasive cancers, such as cervical cancer. Recently, RASSF1A methylation was reported to never be observed in serum of non–cancer patients (9, 10). This slightly discrepant finding may be because we studied a highly selected group of patients who had either a cervical cancer (and 4 of 5 patients with RASSF1A methylation in their serum had advanced disease) or a nonneoplastic lesion of the breast, conditions that are associated with a higher lifetime risk of developing breast cancer (15), especially in the age group of patients who showed RASSF1A methylation in their serum. In light of these data, we speculate that our "false-positive" controls may indicate cancer predisposition or a cancer not yet evident clinically.

We assume that serum RASSF1A DNA methylation is a surrogate marker for circulating breast cancer cells and disappearance indicates a response, whereas persistence or reappearance means resistance to adjuvant tamoxifen treatment.

Adjuvant endocrine therapy is one of the keys to improving breast cancer–specific survival. Recently, a prospective, placebo-controlled trial showed beneficial effects of the aromatase inhibitor letrozole, a drug that reduces local production of estradiol, after discontinuation of tamoxifen therapy (4). Of the 2,582 patients treated in the letrozole arm, only 29 women profited from this treatment by developing no distant metastases as compared with the placebo group. This means that 100 patients have to be treated to prevent distant metastasis in one patient. Because aromatase inhibitors are potentially harmful (e.g., osteoporosis) and cause discomfort (e.g., arthralgia, myalgia) to patients as well as giving economic strain to the health system, tools to identify patients likely to profit from this treatment are acutely needed. Serum RASSF1A DNA methylation is an easy means of detecting patients undergoing adjuvant tamoxifen treatment who need secondary adjuvant therapy. We were able to detect RASSF1A methylation in about 20% of patients with breast cancer 1 year after treatment commencement. It is plausible to speculate that only these patients will benefit from further adjuvant treatment (e.g., switch to aromatase inhibitors). The ability to detect such patients would have a great effect on cost-effectiveness and on preventing side effects in patients otherwise "overtreated" with adjuvant treatment.

In conclusion, we here describe a DNA methylation–based surrogate marker for circulating tamoxifen-resistant cells that can be easily measured in serum.


   Acknowledgments
 
Grant support: "Fonds zur Förderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung" grant P15995-B05.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

We thank Inge Gaugg, Lisl Perkmann, Vera Stivic, Martina Chamson, and Andrea Peyer for excellent technical assistance, and all our colleagues at the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics in Innsbruck. This article is dedicated to my wife Maria and my son Julian (M. Widschwendter).


   Footnotes
 
Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Research Online (http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/).

Received 7/ 8/04. Revised 11/24/04. Accepted 12/ 8/04.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Goldhirsch A, Glick JH, Gelber RD, Coates AS, Senn HJ. Meeting highlights: International Consensus Panel on the Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer. Seventh International Conference on Adjuvant Therapy of Primary Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:3817–27.[Free Full Text]
  2. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 1998;351:1451–67.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Coombes RC, Hall E, Gibson LJ, et al. A randomized trial of exemestane after two to three years of tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal women with primary breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;350:1081–92.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Goss PE, Ingle JN, Martino S, et al. A randomized trial of letrozole in postmenopausal women after five years of tamoxifen therapy for early-stage breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2003;349:1793–802.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Jones PA, Baylin SB. The fundamental role of epigenetic events in cancer. Nat Rev Genet 2002;3:415–28.[Medline]
  6. Esteller M, Sanchez-Cespedes M, Rosell R, Sidransky D, Baylin SB, Herman JG. Detection of aberrant promoter hypermethylation of tumor suppressor genes in serum DNA from non-small cell lung cancer patients. Cancer Res 1999;59:67–70.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Silva JM, Dominguez G, Garcia JM, et al. Presence of tumor DNA in plasma of breast cancer patients: clinicopathological correlations. Cancer Res 1999;59:3251–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Johnson, PJ, Lo YM. Plasma nucleic acids in the diagnosis and management of malignant disease. Clin Chem 2002;48:1186–93.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Dulaimi E, Hillinck J, De Caceres II, Al Saleem T, Cairns P. Tumor suppressor gene promoter hypermethylation in serum of breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:6189–93.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. De Caceres II, Battagli C, Esteller M, et al. Tumor cell-specific BRCA1 and RASSF1A hypermethylation in serum, plasma, and peritoneal fluid from ovarian cancer patients. Cancer Res 2004;64:6476–81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Muller HM, Widschwendter A, Fiegl H, et al. DNA methylation in serum of breast cancer patients: an independent prognostic marker. Cancer Res 2003;63:7641–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Widschwendter M, Siegmund D, Muller HM, et al. Association of breast cancer DNA methylation profiles with hormone receptor status and response to tamoxifen. Cancer Res 2004;64:3807–13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Silva JM, Garcia JM, Dominguez G, et al. Persistence of tumor DNA in plasma of breast cancer patients after mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2002;9:71–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Shao ZM, Wu J, Shen ZZ, Nguyen M. p53 mutation in plasma DNA and its prognostic value in breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 2001;7:2222–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Wang J, Costantino JP, Tan-Chiu E, Wickerham DL, Paik S, Wolmark N. Lower-category benign breast disease and the risk of invasive breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:616–20.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
H. Fiegl, A. Jones, C. Hauser-Kronberger, G. Hutarew, R. Reitsamer, R. L. Jones, M. Dowsett, E. Mueller-Holzner, G. Windbichler, G. Daxenbichler, et al.
Methylated NEUROD1 Promoter is a Marker for Chemosensitivity in Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2008; 14(11): 3494 - 3502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 INT J SURG PATHOLHome page
C. S.-C. Wong, M.-T. Cheung, B. B.-Y. Ma, E. Pun Hui, A. C.-L. Chan, C.-K. Chan, K.-C. Lee, W. Cheuk, M. Y.-Y. Lam, M. C.-K. Wong, et al.
Isolated Tumor Cells and Circulating CK20 mRNA in pN0 Colorectal Cancer Patients
International Journal of Surgical Pathology, April 1, 2008; 16(2): 119 - 126.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Mol. Diagn.Home page
A. A. Melnikov, D. M. Scholtens, E. L. Wiley, S. A. Khan, and V. V. Levenson
Array-Based Multiplex Analysis of DNA Methylation in Breast Cancer Tissues
J. Mol. Diagn., January 1, 2008; 10(1): 93 - 101.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
A. A. Kamat, T. J. Kim, C. N. Landen Jr., C. Lu, L. Y. Han, Y. G. Lin, W. M. Merritt, P. H. Thaker, D. M. Gershenson, F. Z. Bischoff, et al.
Metronomic Chemotherapy Enhances the Efficacy of Antivascular Therapy in Ovarian Cancer
Cancer Res., January 1, 2007; 67(1): 281 - 288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. Widschwendter and U. Menon
Circulating Methylated DNA: A New Generation of Tumor Markers
Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2006; 12(24): 7205 - 7208.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. Wallner, A. Herbst, A. Behrens, A. Crispin, P. Stieber, B. Goke, R. Lamerz, and F. T. Kolligs
Methylation of Serum DNA Is an Independent Prognostic Marker in Colorectal Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2006; 12(24): 7347 - 7352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Endocr Relat CancerHome page
M. Lacroix
Significance, detection and markers of disseminated breast cancer cells
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2006; 13(4): 1033 - 1067.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JCOHome page
N. Umetani, A. E. Giuliano, S. H. Hiramatsu, F. Amersi, T. Nakagawa, S. Martino, and D. S.B. Hoon
Prediction of Breast Tumor Progression by Integrity of Free Circulating DNA in Serum
J. Clin. Oncol., September 10, 2006; 24(26): 4270 - 4276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
A. Mirmohammadsadegh, A. Marini, S. Nambiar, M. Hassan, A. Tannapfel, T. Ruzicka, and U. R. Hengge
Epigenetic Silencing of the PTEN Gene in Melanoma.
Cancer Res., July 1, 2006; 66(13): 6546 - 6552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
K. Koyanagi, T. Mori, S. J. O'Day, S. R. Martinez, H.-J. Wang, and D. S.B. Hoon
Association of circulating tumor cells with serum tumor-related methylated DNA in peripheral blood of melanoma patients.
Cancer Res., June 15, 2006; 66(12): 6111 - 6117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Mol. Diagn.Home page
S. Ogino, T. Kawasaki, M. Brahmandam, M. Cantor, G. J. Kirkner, D. Spiegelman, G. M. Makrigiorgos, D. J. Weisenberger, P. W. Laird, M. Loda, et al.
Precision and Performance Characteristics of Bisulfite Conversion and Real-Time PCR (MethyLight) for Quantitative DNA Methylation Analysis
J. Mol. Diagn., May 1, 2006; 8(2): 209 - 217.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
H. Fiegl, S. Millinger, G. Goebel, E. Muller-Holzner, C. Marth, P. W. Laird, and M. Widschwendter
Breast Cancer DNA Methylation Profiles in Cancer Cells and Tumor Stroma: Association with HER-2/neu Status in Primary Breast Cancer
Cancer Res., January 1, 2006; 66(1): 29 - 33.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JCOHome page
T. Mori, S. J. O'Day, N. Umetani, S. R. Martinez, M. Kitago, K. Koyanagi, C. Kuo, T.-L. Takeshima, R. Milford, H.-J. Wang, et al.
Predictive Utility of Circulating Methylated DNA in Serum of Melanoma Patients Receiving Biochemotherapy
J. Clin. Oncol., December 20, 2005; 23(36): 9351 - 9358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fiegl, H.
Right arrow Articles by Widschwendter, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fiegl, H.
Right arrow Articles by Widschwendter, M.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online