Cancer Research Translational Cancer Medicine 2008: Cancer Clinical Trials and Personalized Medicine Joint Metastasis Research Society-AACR Conference on Metastasis
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Irving, J. A.E.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Irving, J. A.E.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, A. G.
[Cancer Research 65, 3053-3058, April 15, 2005]
© 2005 American Association for Cancer Research

Priority Reports

Loss of Heterozygosity in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Detected by Genome-Wide Microarray Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Analysis

Julie A.E. Irving, Lisa Bloodworth, Nick P. Bown, Marian C. Case, Linda A. Hogarth and Andrew G. Hall

Northern Institute for Cancer Research and Institute for Human Genetics, Newcastle University, Newcastle,United Kingdom

Requests for reprints: Andrew Hall, Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Paul O'Gorman Building, Medical School, Newcastle, NE2 4HH, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-191-246-4411; Fax: 44-191-246-4301; E-mail: a.g.hall{at}ncl.ac.uk.


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 References
 
Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) is detectable in many forms of malignancy, including leukemia, using techniques such as microsatellite analysis and comparative genomic hybridization. However, these techniques are laborious and require the use of relatively large amounts of DNA if the whole genome is to be examined. Here we describe the use of oligonucleotide microarrays to characterize single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in lymphoblasts isolated from children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia for the pan-genomic mapping of LOH with a resolution of 100 to 200 kb. Results were compared with DNA obtained during remission and on relapse. Abnormalities were seen in 8 of 10 cases. The two cases with no abnormalities and one case that showed identical changes at relapse and presentation remain in remission 1 to 9 years following retreatment. The remaining seven patients died following relapse. In four cases, LOH was only detectable at relapse suggesting that progressive LOH may be a cause of disease progression and/or drug resistance. This was supported by detailed analysis of one case in which LOH involving the glucocorticoid receptor was associated with mutation of the remaining allele. The most frequent abnormality detected involved chromosome 9p. In each of the four cases where this was observed LOH included the INK4 locus. In three of the four cases, INK4 loss was only observed at relapse, suggesting that this abnormality may be commonly associated with treatment failure. These observations show that SNP array analysis is a powerful new tool for the analysis of allelic imbalance in leukemic blasts.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 References
 
Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) is frequently observed in malignant cells and contributes to the deregulation of cell division and apoptosis through the deletion of tumor suppressor genes (1). Allelic imbalance may be detected by a variety of methods including karyotyping, comparative genomic hybridization, and microsatellite analysis, but these are either of low resolution or laborious to conduct on a genome-wide scale. The recent introduction of oligonucleotide microarrays designed for the genome-wide typing of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) facilitates detailed mapping for LOH using small amounts of DNA (2, 3). In this study, we describe the use of this technique to characterize progressive LOH in samples from children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who relapse after chemotherapy.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
 References
 
Samples. Ten patients were selected for study from our local tumor bank on the basis of the availability of cells obtained at presentation, during remission, and at relapse. Samples were collected and used according to local ethical guidelines (reference no. 2002/111). Mononuclear cells were purified by differential centrifugation before storage at –80°C. Samples obtained at presentation and relapse were shown to have >95% blasts by morphologic examination of stained cytospins. In those obtained during remission, the blast count was <5%.

Single nucleotide polymorphism microarray analysis. DNA was extracted from thawed cell pellets using either a standard phenol chloroform method or QIamp DNA Minikit (Qiagen Ltd., Crawley, Sussex) and digested using XbaI before ligation to adaptors which recognize the cohesive four basepair overhangs. The PCR was used to amplify adapter ligated DNA fragments, using primers that recognize the adapter sequence. The amplified DNA was fragmented, end-labeled with a fluorescent tag and hybridized to a GeneChip Mapping 10 K array (Affymetrix UK Ltd., High Wycombe, United Kingdom).

Each array allows analysis of 11,555 SNPs, distributed evenly across the genome with a mean interval of 105 kb and median interval of 210 kb. Each SNP on the array is represented by 40 different 25-bp oligonucleotides, each with slight variations that allow accurate genotyping. Hybridization to each probe was assessed using a GeneChip Scanner (Affymetrix) and results scored using proprietary software (GDAS, Affymetrix). Results were exported to Excel spreadsheets (Microsoft) for further analysis. Sample analysis was done by Medical Research Council Geneservice (Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom).

The result spreadsheets contained information about the identity of each SNP and its chromosomal location. Each SNP was scored as AA, BB (homozygous), or AB (heterozygous), depending on the genotype or as "no call" in the event of equivocal results. To compare samples obtained at presentation and relapse with normal DNA, data was imported into a single spreadsheet. SNPs were sorted according to chromosome number and location. Using the filter function in Excel "no-call" results were excluded and informative loci selected for the normal samples (i.e., those scoring as AB). Results from the presentation or relapse samples were then filtered to contain only those samples that scored AA or BB at loci that scored AB in the normal samples. Areas showing consecutive loci with differing scores were highlighted and reexamined for the presence of heterozygous loci between them, which had failed in the normal samples. In cases where this was not seen, it was concluded that there was LOH between the loci examined.

Microsatellite analysis. Microsatellite analyses were done using standard procedures for all samples showing LOH by SNP microarrray. Sequences of the primers used and the PCR conditions are available on request. Briefly, forward primers were fluorescently labeled using a Beckman WellRed dye (D2, D3, or D4) and following PCR, 1 µL of each reaction was combined with 40 µL of deionized formamide and 0.25 µL size standard-400 (Beckman Coulter UK, High Wycombe, Bucks, United Kingdom) labeled with Beckman WellRed dye D1. Automatic sizing of fluorescent PCR products was then done using a CEQ2000XL (Beckman Coulter UK) capillary system.


   Results and Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
References
 
Matched samples were analyzed from 10 boys with ALL aged between 18 months and 7 years at the time of presentation. The abnormalities detected by SNP array analysis are summarized in Table 1. Microsatellite allelotype analysis was done at 19 of the 21 abnormal loci detected by the SNP microarray and in all cases confirmed LOH, thus validating this novel methodology (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1. Details of losses of heterozygosity seen at presentation and relapse

 
Abnormalities were detected either at relapse or at both presentation and relapse in eight cases. In one case, L151, allelic imbalances involving whole chromosomes (4, 6, 12, and 20) were identical at presentation and relapse. In the remaining cases LOH was either only apparent at relapse or involved losses in addition to those seen at presentation. In no cases were there losses seen at presentation which were not apparent at relapse, suggesting that relapse was associated with clonal evolution. Although the number of cases studied is too small to give a definite indication of the prognostic significance of LOH, it is striking that all the patients with progressive LOH at relapse have progressed and died from their disease, whereas those with either no abnormalities or whole chromosome loss responded well to salvage therapy and are disease free 1 to 9 years after relapse.

The most common abnormality detected, occurring in four cases, involved loss of portions of the short arm of chromosome 9. In the only comprehensive allelotype analysis of relapsed ALL reported to date, Takeuchi et al. (4) also showed that 9p was the most frequent site for LOH when leukemia recurs, occurring in 15 of 38 informative cases. The region found to be deleted in this study, and in the cases reported here, includes the p16/INK4{alpha} locus, a tumor suppressor gene previously reported by others to be deleted in ALL and to have adverse prognostic significance (5–8).

The extent of the deletion seen in each of the affected cases is shown in Fig. 1. In two of these, L173 and L184, abnormalities were only seen at relapse. In one case, L169, the extent of loss was identical at presentation and on relapse. In the remaining case, loss initially involved a region distal to the p16/INK4 locus, but at relapse, a second small interstitial loss of about 900 kb was seen which included this area.



View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 1. LOH affecting chromosome 9p. Arrow, position of p16ink4.

 
These observations provide valuable "proof of principle" that analysis of LOH by SNP microarrays can indicate biologically significant areas of allelic imbalance. Further proof is provided by case L173 in which LOH occurred in chromosome 5q at relapse. The area of loss included the glucocorticoid receptor gene at 5q31.3. To confirm LOH at this locus, microsatellite analysis was done using a marker 200 kb from the GR gene. The results (Fig. 2) confirmed the findings of the SNP array analysis. LOH was associated with partial deletion of the partner allele.1 Complete loss of glucocorticoid receptor function would be associated with marked steroid resistance.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 2. Microsatellite analyses of the dinucleotide repeat at the D5S207 microsatellite in samples of patient L173 showing the presence of two alleles (136 and 138 bp) in both remission (i.e., constitutive) and presentation samples but only one (138 bp) allele in the relapse sample, indicative of LOH.

 
Further confirmation of the possible functional significance of progressive LOH at relapse was provided by case L169 in which relapse was associated with loss of a portion of chromosome 17q21.2 which included the TOP2A gene. Microsatellite analysis confirmed LOH at three of the four loci studied. Minor inconsistencies between results obtained by mapping arrays and microsatellites have been noted before (3) and may indicate errors due to miscalling ("noise") of the SNP array or mapping of the SNP loci which may not be completely stable. Topoisomerase II {alpha}, encoded by TOP2A, is an important target for chemotherapy and loss of TOP2A gene has been associated with the development of resistance to agents used in the treatment of children with leukemia (e.g., anthracyclins and etoposide; ref. 9). As steroids and anthracyclins are an important component of antileukemic therapy, it may be inferred that these genetic alterations present at relapse are likely to have functional significance, although drug sensitivity of the leukemic blasts has not been formally tested in these patients.

Results of bone marrow cytogenetic analyses at presentation were available in all cases apart from L181, which failed to produce metaphases for conventional karyotyping. Case L423 showed a normal karyotype by cytogenetics and no LOH by microarray analysis. Three cases (152, 173, and 184) showed karyotype abnormalities but no LOH. Two of these involved hyperdiploidy typically seen in ALL and one involved a balanced translocation; in none of these three cases were regions of chromosome loss evident cytogenetically. Case L83 showed complete concordance between LOH findings (9p LOH) and classic cytogenetics (unbalanced 9p translocation resulting in visible segment loss). Three cases showed partial concordance between LOH and visible chromosomal changes. L121 had visible deletions of 13q and of chromosome 16 (ring) corresponding to LOH findings for these regions, but the LOH detected on 6q was not apparent cytogenetically. Case L169 was reported as showing monosomy 20 as the sole cytogenetic aberration in bone marrow cells, but LOH analysis identified 9p LOH and loss of 20q, with retention of heterozygosity for 20p. These findings strongly implicate unbalanced translocation der(9)t(9;20),–20 as described by Clark et al. (10). This cryptic rearrangement was recognized as a recurrent abnormality in ALL in 2000 and results in partial monosomies for 9p and 20q. The most discrepant results for the comparison of cytogenetics and mapping array analysis were for case L151, which showed a hyperdiploid karyotype with no regions of loss evident by chromosome analysis, but LOH events affecting the entire length of chromosomes 4, 6, 12, and 20. It is possible that this apparent loss is due to uniparental disomy, as has previously been shown for chromosome 6 (11).

Hence, in presentation bone marrows, microarray analysis identified six regions of LOH (from three cases) which were undetected by routine cytogenetics.

Five cases showed LOH events at relapse, which were not apparent at presentation and these were compared with karyotype data. L15 developed a 12q LOH that was not detected by cytogenetics, which indicated normal bone marrow karyotype at both diagnosis and relapse. L152 acquired LOH for 1q, 2p, 5p, 8p, and 8q. These losses cannot be correlated with the hyperdiploid karyotypes observed by chromosome analysis. L169 acquired 9q LOH consistent with the appearance of del(9)(q12q22) in the relapse karyotype. L173 developed LOH at 5q, 9p, and 18p; chromosome analysis at relapse did not identify segment losses at these locations. L184 developed 9p LOH: this was not visible in the relapse karyotype.

Hence, on relapse, 10 regions of loss were identified (from four cases) which were not detected by cytogenetics.

These results suggest that SNP array analysis is capable of detecting abnormalities not apparent by routine karyotyping. This may be because the losses are too small, because allelic loss occurs as a consequence of chromosome duplication or mitotic recombination with LOH distal to the recombination site (12) or because subclones containing these aberrations fail to divide in culture before karyotype analysis (13). In a study using high-resolution comparative genomic hybridization (HRCGH), Kristensen et al. (13) also found significantly more aberrations than G-band karyotyping in childhood ALL studied at presentation. Twenty-one percent of cases had 9p losses seen by HRCGH, whereas only 5% had losses in the same region detectable by cytogenetics.

The amount of DNA required to perform SNP array analysis, 250 ng per sample, was less than the amount used by Takeuchi for the genome-wide microsatellite analysis (5-25 ng per PCR for 71 markers, equivalent to between 355 and 1,775 ng) and gave data at 162 times more loci. The resolution of the technique allowed the determination of the extent of LOH in a single assay. Although the 3- to 5-Mb resolution of HRCGH was greater than that of microsatellite analysis (14), this is still considerably less than the 210-kb resolution of SNP arrays and the amount of DNA required is much higher (5 µg), limiting the number of cases which can be studied.

In summary, SNP array analysis is a technique which facilitates the analysis of LOH in a small sample of DNA from patients with leukemia. Unlike cytogenetics it is not dependent on the ability of cells to undergo division in culture and can be used for the retrospective analysis of cell pellets and purified DNA. It offers better resolution than either microsatellite analysis or HRCGH and uses less starting material than either.


   Acknowledgments
 
Grant support: Leukaemia Research Fund, Tyneside Leukaemia Research Association, and North of England Children's Cancer Research.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

We thank Lynne Minto for expert technical assistance and Christine Harrison for her advice.


   Footnotes
 
Note: SNP array analysis was done by Medical Research Council geneservice (http://www.geneservice.mrc.ac.uk).

Medical Research Council geneservice is a not for profit biological resource center and contract research organization supported by the UK Medical Research Council.

1 Irving et al., submitted for publication. Back

Received 7/26/04. Revised 12/16/04. Accepted 2/ 9/05.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 References
 

  1. Lengauer C, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B. Genetic instabilities in human cancers. Nature 1998;396:643–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Matsuzaki H, Loi H, Dong S, et al. Parallel genotyping of over 10,000 SNPs using a one-primer assay on a high-density oligonucleotide array. Genome Res 2004;14:414–25.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Wong KK, Tsang YT, Shen J, et al. Allelic imbalance analysis by high-density single-nucleotide polymorphic allele (SNP) array with whole genome amplified DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32:e69.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Takeuchi S, Seriu T, van Dongen JJ, et al. Allelotype analysis in relapsed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Oncogene 2003;22:6970–6.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Calero Moreno TM, Gustafsson G, Garwicz S, et al. Deletion of the Ink4-locus (the p16ink4a, p14ARF and p15ink4b genes) predicts relapse in children with ALL treated according to the Nordic protocols NOPHO-86 and NOPHO-92. Leukemia 2002;16:2037–45.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Hann I, Vora A, Harrison G, et al. Determinants of outcome after intensified therapy of childhood lymphoblastic leukaemia: results from Medical Research Council United Kingdom acute lymphoblastic leukaemia XI protocol. Br J Haematol 2001;113:103–14.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Scholz I, Popp S, Granzow M, et al. Comparative genomic hybridization in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: correlation with interphase cytogenetics and loss of heterozygosity analysis. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2001;124:89–97.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Heerema NA, Sather HN, Sensel MG, et al. Association of chromosome arm 9p abnormalities with adverse risk in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report from the Children's Cancer Group. Blood 1999;94:1537–44.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Yasui K, Mihara S, Zhao C, et al. Alteration in copy numbers of genes as a mechanism for acquired drug resistance. Cancer Res 2004;64:1403–14.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Clark R, Byatt SA, Bennett CF, et al. Monosomy 20 as a pointer to dicentric (9;20) in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia 2000;14:241–6.[Medline]
  11. McEvoy CR, Morley AA, Firgaira FA. Evidence for whole chromosome 6 loss and duplication of the remaining chromosome in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2003;37:321–5.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Takeuchi S, Tsukasaki K, Bartram CR, et al. Long-term study of the clinical significance of loss of heterozygosity in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia 2003;17:149–54.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Kristensen TD, Wesenberg F, Jonsson OG, et al. High-resolution comparative genomic hybridisation yields a high detection rate of chromosomal aberrations in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Eur J Haematol 2003;70:363–72.[Medline]
  14. Kirchhoff M, Gerdes T, Maahr J, et al. Deletions below 10 megabasepairs are detected in comparative genomic hybridization by standard reference intervals. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1999;25:410–3.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BloodHome page
L. P. Gondek, R. Tiu, C. L. O'Keefe, M. A. Sekeres, K. S. Theil, and J. P. Maciejewski
Chromosomal lesions and uniparental disomy detected by SNP arrays in MDS, MDS/MPD, and MDS-derived AML
Blood, February 1, 2008; 111(3): 1534 - 1542.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. R. Mansour, V. Duke, L. Foroni, B. Patel, C. G. Allen, P. J. Ancliff, R. E. Gale, and D. C. Linch
Notch-1 Mutations Are Secondary Events in Some Patients with T-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2007; 13(23): 6964 - 6969.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
C. W. Ross, P. D. Ouillette, C. M. Saddler, K. A. Shedden, and S. N. Malek
Comprehensive Analysis of Copy Number and Allele Status Identifies Multiple Chromosome Defects Underlying Follicular Lymphoma Pathogenesis
Clin. Cancer Res., August 15, 2007; 13(16): 4777 - 4785.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Endocr Relat CancerHome page
Y. Nagano, D. H. Kim, L. Zhang, J. A White, J. C Yao, S. R Hamilton, and A. Rashid
Allelic alterations in pancreatic endocrine tumors identified by genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism analysis
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2007; 14(2): 483 - 492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 haematolHome page
C. Agueli, R. Basirico, F. Fabbiano, V. Rizzo, L. Cascio, G. Cammarata, A. Marfia, M. La Rosa, S. Mirto, and A. Santoro
Loss of heterozygosity in acute leukemia: evidence of frequent submicroscopic deletions
Haematologica, May 1, 2007; 92(5): 678 - 681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
M. Stark and N. Hayward
Genome-Wide Loss of Heterozygosity and Copy Number Analysis in Melanoma Using High-Density Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Arrays
Cancer Res., March 15, 2007; 67(6): 2632 - 2642.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Genome Res.Home page
J. Oosting, E. H. Lips, R. van Eijk, P. H.C. Eilers, K. Szuhai, C. Wijmenga, H. Morreau, and T. van Wezel
High-resolution copy number analysis of paraffin-embedded archival tissue using SNP BeadArrays
Genome Res., March 1, 2007; 17(3): 368 - 376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Evid Based Complement Alternat MedHome page
P. Chavan, K. Joshi, and B. Patwardhan
DNA Microarrays in Herbal Drug Research
Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med., December 1, 2006; 3(4): 447 - 457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ASH Education BookHome page
J. R. Downing and C. G. Mullighan
Tumor-Specific Genetic Lesions and Their Influence on Therapy in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Hematology, January 1, 2006; 2006(1): 118 - 122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BloodHome page
A. V. Jones, S. Kreil, K. Zoi, K. Waghorn, C. Curtis, L. Zhang, J. Score, R. Seear, A. J. Chase, F. H. Grand, et al.
Widespread occurrence of the JAK2 V617F mutation in chronic myeloproliferative disorders
Blood, September 15, 2005; 106(6): 2162 - 2168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Irving, J. A.E.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Irving, J. A.E.
Right arrow Articles by Hall, A. G.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation