Cancer Research Targets Genetics and Biology of Brain Cancer
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoogervorst, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by de Vries, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoogervorst, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by de Vries, A.
[Cancer Research 65, 3610-3616, May 1, 2005]
© 2005 American Association for Cancer Research

Molecular Biology, Pathobiology, and Genetics

Lack of p53 Ser389 Phosphorylation Predisposes Mice to Develop 2-Acetylaminofluorene–Induced Bladder Tumors but not Ionizing Radiation–Induced Lymphomas

Esther M. Hoogervorst1, Wendy Bruins1, Edwin Zwart1, Conny Th.M. van Oostrom1, Gerard J. van den Aardweg2, Rudolf B. Beems1, Jolanda van den Berg1, Tyler Jacks3, Harry van Steeg1 and Annemieke de Vries1

1 National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Laboratory of Toxicology, Pathology, and Genetics, Bilthoven; 2 Josephine Nefkens Institute, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; and 3 Center for Cancer Research, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts

Requests for reprints: Annemieke de Vries, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Laboratory of Toxicology, Pathology, and Genetics, 3720 BA Bilthoven, the Netherlands. Phone: 31-30-274-3483; Fax: 31-30-274-4446; E-mail: Annemieke.de.Vries{at}rivm.nl.


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cellular activity of the tumor suppressor protein p53 is primarily regulated by posttranslational modifications. Phosphorylation of the COOH terminus, including Ser389, is thought to result in a conformational change of the p53 protein, enhancing DNA binding and transcriptional activity. In vitro studies presented here show that, in addition to UV radiation, Ser389 is phosphorylated upon exposure to 2-acetylaminofluorene (2-AAF). Both agents induce bulky DNA adducts repaired by nucleotide excision repair (NER). In contrast, ionizing radiation, known to induce DNA damage not repaired by NER, does not result in Ser389 phosphorylation. Previously, we have shown that p53.S389A mutant mice, lacking the Ser389 phosphorylation site, are sensitive to developing UV-induced skin tumors. Here, we show that p53.S389A mice are also prone to developing 2-AAF–induced urinary bladder tumors, whereas no increased tumor response was found upon ionizing irradiation. These results provide evidence for our hypothesis that phosphorylation of Ser389 is important for activation of p53 to exert its function as a tumor suppressor not exclusively upon the presence of UV-induced DNA damage, but also upon exposure to other bulky adduct-inducing agents. Analysis of 2-AAF– and UV-induced tumors from p53.S389A mice revealed the presence of additional p53 mutations, indicating that lack of Ser389 phosphorylation by itself is not sufficient to abrogate p53 function in tumor suppression. In addition, analyses of skin tumors of p53.S389A mice revealed an interesting hotspot mutation previously found exclusively in NER-deficient mice and patients.


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cancer is caused by loss of controlled cell growth, due to mutational inactivation or activation of genes involved in cell cycle regulation. Several mechanisms are known to be critical in the prevention of cells from becoming cancerous. Of these, cell cycle control and DNA repair result in the removal of DNA damage before mutations are formed, whereas the process of apoptosis eliminates cells with sustained DNA damage. These cellular responses are mediated, at least in part, by the p53 tumor suppressor protein (1–3).

The levels of p53 protein in normal unstressed cells are very low due to rapid protein degradation mediated by MDM2 (4). However, in response to DNA damage or other sources of cellular stress, p53 protein levels increase and its transcriptional activity is greatly increased (5). The key mechanism of p53 activation is posttranslational modification, including (de)phosphorylation, acetylation, and sumoylation (1–3). Several sites have been shown to be potential targets for modifications, and affect p53 functions in a variety of ways. For example, phosphorylation at its NH2 terminus disrupts the interaction of p53 with the MDM2 protein, thereby preventing degradation and thus stabilizing the p53 protein (6–8). Modifications of the p53 COOH terminus are thought to result in a conformational change, thereby enhancing DNA-specific binding and transcriptional activity (9, 10). The specific patterns of p53 posttranslational modifications seem to be dependent on the specific type of agent to which the cell is exposed to. At the COOH-terminal regulatory domain, Ser315 is phosphorylated after exposure to both UV-light and ionizing radiation (9, 11). This is in contrast with Ser392 (equivalent to mouse Ser389), which is specifically phosphorylated upon UV radiation (12, 13). Kinases responsible for Ser389 phosphorylation include CKII, p38 kinase, and PKR (13–16).

To enable the in vivo functional analysis of a specific p53 phosphorylation site, we recently generated mice with a single point mutation in the p53 gene, resulting in a serine to alanine substitution at amino acid residue 389 (p53.S389A mutation; ref. 17). Absence of the Ser389 site resulted in reduced DNA binding capacity and reduced expression levels of p53 target genes, indicating that the transcription-regulating activity of p53 is adversely affected. In addition, the apoptotic response was impaired in cells lacking the Ser389 phosphorylation site. In line with these in vitro findings, the p53.S389A mutation resulted in an impaired p53 function in vivo, as mice carrying the mutation were more susceptible to develop skin tumors upon exposure to UV-light (17). Both survival and latency time of spontaneous tumor development in these mutant mice were, however, not altered, indicating that adverse effects of lack of Ser389 phosphorylation are linked to exposure to genotoxic stress, i.e., UV-induced bulky DNA adducts.

Apart from UV-light, a variety of genotoxic agents are known to induce bulky DNA adducts, all of which are substrates for nucleotide excision repair (NER; refs. 18–20). Exposure to this class of compounds might result in the activation of p53 through a uniform pattern of specific posttranslational modification events, including phosphorylation of Ser389. If so, absence of the Ser389 phosphorylation site could result in an adversely affected p53 tumor suppressor function after exposure to NER-related agents. To test this hypothesis, we did a carcinogenicity study with p53.S389A mice that were exposed to an additional NER-specific compound, 2-acetylaminofluorene (2-AAF). As a control, we analyzed tumor development of p53.S389A mice upon exposure to ionizing radiation, inducing non-NER-related DNA damage. Our in vitro and in vivo studies suggested that Ser389 phosphorylation is not exclusively involved in p53 activation after UV-light, but rather seems related to a broader class of compounds inducing similar types of DNA damage.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Western blot analysis. Wild-type and p53–/– mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEF) were expanded and plated at a density of 1.2 x 106 cells/10 cm dish. Twenty-four hours later, cells were washed with PBS and exposed to 5 Gy ionizing radiation, 20 J/m2 UV-C light or 12 µmol/L NA-AAF. Six hours later, Western blot analyses were done as described previously by Bruins et al. (17). Briefly, p53 immunoprecipitation was done with an anti-p53 mouse monoclonal antibody Ab-4 (Oncogene Research Products, Carlsbad, CA). The concentrated samples were separated on polyacrylamide electrophoresis gels (NuPAGE, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and transferred to Hybond polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ). The original lysates were also separated and transferred as described above. Subsequently, membranes were incubated with either anti-p53 mouse antibody Ab-1 (Oncogene Research Products) or anti-phospho-p53 rabbit polyclonal antibody Ser392 (Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA) which is known to cross-react with mouse Ser389. Primary antibodies were detected by incubating the membrane with horseradish peroxidase-linked sheep anti-mouse IgG or horseradish peroxidase-linked donkey anti-rabbit IgG (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The membranes with remnants were incubated with an anti-actin affinity-purified goat polyclonal antibody I-19-HRP (Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA). Staining was done by using enhanced chemiluminescence plus reagent (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The membranes were scanned using a PhophorImager (Storm 860, Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA).

Mice. p53S389A/S389A mice (17) were crossed with p53+/– mice (21) to obtain p53S389A/– mice. For the survival experiments, the 2-AAF and ionizing radiation exposure experiments, mice were all in a mixed 129Sv/C57BL/6 background. For the UV-B light experiment, mice were crossed into a hairless background (SKH:HRA).

In vivo 2-acetylaminofluorene treatment. For the 2-AAF study, wild-type, p53S389A/+, p53S389A/S389A, p53S389A/–, and p53+/– mice (ages 6-9 weeks) were treated for 39 weeks with 300 ppm 2-AAF in the diet, and were subsequently fed a normal diet for 2 weeks. All treatment groups consisted of 30 mice per genotype (15 males and 15 females). The control groups consisted of 10 mice per genotype (5 males and 5 females) and were fed a normal diet for 41 weeks. Mice that became moribund or lost >20% of their bodyweight were sacrificed intercurrently.

In vivo exposure to ionizing radiation. The ionizing radiation study was done with wild-type, p53S389A/+, p53S389A/S389A, p53S389A/–, and p53+/– mice (ages 6-9 weeks). All groups, consisting of 15 mice (approximately equal numbers of males and females), were exposed to a single dose of 5 Gy of X-rays with a dose rate of 0.31 Gy/minute at 200 kV. Control mice of all genotypes were followed as they aged (cf. 17). Mice that became moribund or lost >20% of their bodyweight were sacrificed intercurrently. All surviving mice were scheduled for autopsy 54 weeks after the radiation.

In vivo UV irradiation. For the chronic UV-B irradiation experiment, hairless wild-type, p53S389A/+, p53S389A/S389A, p53S389A/–, and p53+/– mice (ages 6-9 weeks) were exposed daily to a UV-B light dose of 600 J/m2 using Philips TL12 lamps as previously described (17). The UV-irradiated wild-type, p53S389A/+, p53S389A/–, and p53+/– groups consisted of 14 mice per genotype (7 males and 7 females), the UV-irradiated p53S389A/S389A group consisted of 20 mice (approximately equal numbers of males and females). Mice that had developed a tumor >3 mm, became moribund, or lost >20% of their bodyweight were sacrificed.

Necropsy and (histo)pathology. Upon necropsy, tissues and macroscopically found tumors were fixed in 3.8% neutral buffered formaldehyde, and a slice of the tumors was snap-frozen in liquid N2. For histopathologic analysis, the formaldehyde-fixed samples were embedded in paraffin wax, cut into 5 µm sections and stained with H&E.

Sequence analysis of the p53 gene. Frozen skin tumors of UV-treated mice were analyzed for acquired p53 mutations by direct sequencing. For this, DNA was isolated using the DNA Isolation Kit for blood/bone marrow/tissue (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN). according to the manufacturer's protocol. Part of the p53 gene, spanning exons 2 to 8, were amplified using the HotStarTaq Master Mix Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). First, exons 2 to 4 or exons 5 to 8 were amplified using the following primers:

Exons 2 to 4: 5'-CAAGTTATGCATCCATACAG-3' and 5'-TCAGGGCAAAACTAAACTCT-3'
Exons 5 to 8: 5'-GAGGGCGTCCAATGGTGCTT-3' and 5'-GGTGGGCAGCGCTGTGGAAGG-3'

Subsequently, regions spanning exon 2, exons 3 to 4, exons 5 to 6, or exons 7 to 8 were re-amplified using the following primers:

Exon 2: 5'-CAAGTTATGCATCCATACAG-3' and 5'-TTTGTTTCTCTCAGGCAAGG-3'
Exons 3 to 4: 5'-GCCTGGGATAAGTGAGATTC-3' and 5'-TCAGGGCAAAACTAAACTCT-3'
Exons 5 to 6: 5'-AGTTCCCCACCTTGACACCT-3' and 5'-GTCAACTGTCTCTAAGACGCA-3'
Exons 7 to 8: 5'-TTCCCGGCTGCTGCAGGTCA-3' and 5'-AGGAGAGAGCAAGAGGTGACT-3'

Purified PCR products (QIAquick PCR Purification Kit, Qiagen) were directly sequenced using the Big Dye Terminator Sequence kit version 3.1 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and an ABI 3700 DNA sequencer. The primers were the same as used for re-amplification PCR (see above).

Statistical analyses. The statistical significance of tumor responses were calculated with the Kaplan-Meyer test for UV-light and ionizing radiation studies, and with one-tailed Fisher's exact test for the 2-AAF carcinogenicity study. The level of statistical significance was taken as P ≤ 0.05.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Phosphorylation of p53 Ser389 upon in vitro exposure to genotoxic agents. We have previously shown that p53 Ser389 is phosphorylated in vitro upon exposure to UV light (17). In the present study, we analyzed p53 protein after exposure to NA-AAF (a reactive metabolite of 2-AAF) to analyze whether p53 Ser389 phosphorylation is also associated with exposure to another NER-specific agent. For this purpose, wild-type and p53–/– MEFs were exposed to 12 µmol/L NA-AAF, 20 J/m2 UV light or 5 Gy ionizing radiation and levels of total p53 protein and p53 protein phosphorylated at Ser389 were determined (Fig. 1). In response to NA-AAF treatment, UV irradiation and ionizing radiation, the total p53 protein levels increased significantly in wild-type MEFs as compared with the expected low p53 levels in untreated wild-type MEFs. In contrast, Ser389 phosphorylation was detectable upon NA-AAF treatment and UV irradiation, whereas no phosphorylation at this site was found upon ionizing irradiation. Similar observations were made at additional time points as well as after exposure to different doses (data not shown and ref. 17).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Figure 1. p53 protein levels in MEFs upon exposure to ionizing radiation, UV light or NA-AAF. MEFs were exposed to 20 J/m2 UV light, 12 µmol/L NA-AAF or 5 Gy ionizing radiation. Six hours later, total p53 protein levels and Ser389 phosphorylated p53 protein levels were visualized by Western blotting. The residuals of the samples were incubated with an anti-actin antibody to quantify the total protein levels present in the samples.

 
2-Acetylaminofluorene-induced tumor responses in p53.S389A mice. In line with our previously described chronic UV-light study with p53.S389A mutant mice (17), we analyzed the tumor responses of p53.S389A mice after exposure to the NER-specific compound 2-AAF. This study revealed that p53S389A/S389A mice are more susceptible than wild-type mice to develop 2-AAF–induced urinary bladder lesions (see Table 1). An increased number of both atypical foci as well as transitional cell tumors was observed in p53S389A/S389A mice as compared with wild-type mice (P = 0.05, see supplemental Fig. 3A-C for typical examples). p53S389A/+ mice developed some atypical lesions, but no urinary bladder tumors. Both p53S389A/– and p53+/– mice showed a significantly increased urinary bladder tumor response as compared with wild-type mice upon exposure to 2-AAF (P = 0.007 and P = 0.0001, respectively). The 2-AAF–induced urinary bladder tumor incidence of p53+/– mice (38%) is in line with our previous results (29%; ref. 22). No significant difference was found between the tumor incidences of p53+/– as compared with p53S389A/– mice.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 1. 2-AAF–induced tumor development in p53.S389A mice

 
In liver, 2-AAF treatment resulted in a low incidence of hepatocellular tumors in all genotypes tested (see Table 1; supplemental Fig. 3D and E for typical examples). According to these results, the absence of the Ser389 phosphorylation site clearly did not affect 2-AAF–induced liver tumor development.

Previously, immunohistochemical studies indicated that ~50% of 2-AAF–induced urinary bladder tumors obtained from p53+/– mice carried additional p53 mutations in the remaining wild-type allele (22). This high incidence of p53 mutations was also observed in this study, as two out of five urinary bladder tumors obtained from p53+/– mice were positive for both the CM5 antibody (recognizing up-regulated wild-type and mutated p53 protein) and Pab240 antibody (specific for mutated p53 protein only; see supplemental Table 3; and supplemental Fig. 4A and B for typical examples and supplemental Materials and Methods for protocol). In addition, we detected CM5- and Pab240-positive fields in 2-AAF–induced urinary bladder tumors obtained from both p53S389A/– (two out of five tumors analyzed) and p53S389A/S389A (two out of four tumors analyzed) mice, indicating that additional p53 mutations were acquired in the process of tumor development in these mice. No clear difference was found in the number or size of p53-positive fields in mice carrying the Ser389 mutation (p53S389A/S389A as well as p53S389A/– mice) as compared with p53+/– mice (supplemental Table 3).

Survival of p53.S389A mice upon exposure to ionizing radiation. Clearly, as shown in Fig. 1 and described before (17), exposure to ionizing radiation does not result in phosphorylation of Ser389. To analyze whether absence of Ser389 phosphorylation affects ionizing radiation–induced tumor development in vivo, we exposed wild-type, p53S389A/+, p53S389A/S389A, p53S389A/–, and p53+/– mice to a single dose of 5 Gy radiation. No difference was found between the survival of wild-type, p53S389A/+ or p53S389A/S389A mice as 87%, 73%, and 73%, respectively, survived at least 54 weeks after the ionizing irradiation (Fig. 2). However, p53+/– mice showed a severely reduced survival after irradiation (50% survival at 24 weeks, P < 0.0001 as compared with wild-type mice), which is in line with observations made by others (23, 24). Survival of p53S389A/– mice did not significantly differ from that of p53+/– mice (50% survival at 21 weeks), again indicating that absence of the Ser389 phosphorylation site has no effect on ionizing radiation–induced tumor development in mice. The irradiation protocol used resulted in the development of predominantly lymphoblastic lymphomas (either generalized or residing in the thymus) as all intercurrently sacrificed mice had developed this tumor type, irrespective of the p53 genotype.



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Figure 2. Survival of ionizing irradiated mice. Wild-type, p53S389A/+, p53S389A/S389A, p53S389A/–, and p53+/– mice were exposed to a single dose of ionizing radiation (5 Gy), and monitored for the development of tumors. Mice were scheduled for autopsy at 54 weeks after the {gamma} treatment. ({04-4328fx01l}) wild-type, ({04-4328fx02l}) p53S389A/+, ({04-4328fx03l}) p53S389A/S389A, ({04-4328fx04l}) p53S389A/–, ({04-4328fx05l}), p53+/–.

 
Ionizing radiation–induced lymphomas have previously been shown to display loss of heterozygosity at a high frequency in p53+/– mice (23). In line with these results, we found loss of heterozygosity in four out of five (80%) of the lymphomas isolated from p53+/– (see supplemental Fig. 5 for typical examples and supplemental Materials and Methods for protocol). Also, seven out of eight (88%) of the lymphomas obtained from p53S389A/– mice displayed loss of heterozygosity. Thus, lack of Ser389 phosphorylation in mice does not affect incidence, latency time, and underlying molecular events of ionizing radiation–induced tumor development.

UV-induced skin tumor development in p53.S389A mice. We previously showed that p53.S389A mutant mice developed skin tumors significantly earlier than their wild-type littermates upon exposure to UV light, indicating that the absence of Ser389 phosphorylation influences the onset of skin tumor development (ref. 17 and supplemental Fig. 6). In the present study, we compared UV-induced tumor responses of p53S389A/– mice and p53+/– mice. The tumor latency time of p53S389A/– mice was slightly, but not significantly, reduced compared with p53+/– mice (supplemental Fig. 6). Comparing the tumor response of p53S389A/S389A mice with that of p53S389A/– animals revealed that absence of Ser389 phosphorylation resulted in a less severe cancer phenotype compared with complete absence of one p53 allele (p53S389A/– mice).

Acquired p53 gene mutations in UV-induced skin tumors of p53.S389A mice. Alteration of p53 function by acquired gene mutations in UV-induced skin lesions is a common molecular event in both mice and humans (25–30). Here, we investigated whether UV-induced skin tumors of p53.S389A mice are, like bladder tumors, accompanied by the formation of additional p53 mutations. For this purpose, we analyzed skin tumors obtained from wild-type, p53+/–, p53S389A/S389A, and p53S389A/– mice by direct sequencing of the p53 gene (Table 2). Consistent with previous studies (25–30), p53 mutations were predominantly found at dipyrimidine sites and originated from C to T transitions, irrespective of the genotype of the mice. In addition, the majority of mutations were found on the nontranscribed strand (NTS) of the p53 gene, demonstrating the reduced efficiency of NER in nontranscribed DNA in mice (31). Again, p53 genotype of the mice did not seem to affect this strand bias (see Table 2). In line with previously described studies (25–30), 88% of the skin tumors obtained from UV-irradiated wild-type mice and 82% of the skin tumors obtained from UV-irradiated p53+/– mice harbored p53 mutations. The observed p53 mutation spectra in skin tumors from wild-type mice was comparable to the spectrum described before, and included among others, the well-known mutation hotspot in mouse skin cancer at codon 270 (25–30). Interestingly, sequence analysis of tumors obtained from p53.S389A mice revealed that, despite the presence of the mutation at codon 389, additional p53 gene mutations were acquired upon UV irradiation. The percentage of tumors from p53.S389A mutant mice harboring an additional p53 mutation was not significantly changed compared with the percentage of wild-type tumors. However, the spectrum of p53 mutations seemed altered compared with the spectrum observed in skin tumors from wild-type mice. First, in UV-induced skin tumors from S389A mutant mice, p53 gene mutations were found more dispersed over the p53 gene. Second, an Arg-to-Cys mutation at codon 210 was found in 6 out of 20 (30%) p53S389A/S389A tumors analyzed, whereas this mutation was found at a very low frequency in wild-type, p53+/– and p53S389A/– mice (13%, 12%, and 5%, respectively). With respect to the p53+/– and p53S389A/– mice, p53 mutations seemed to be present at the 5' part of the p53 gene in contrast with wild-type mice. In addition, the number of mutations per tumor was much lower in p53+/– and p53S389A/– mice as compared with wild-type, which might be attributed to the presence of only one p53 allele in these mice.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 2. p53 mutation spectrum in UV light–induced skin tumors of p53.S389A mice

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
In the present study, we show that Ser389 is phosphorylated in vitro upon the introduction of NER-specific DNA damages by UV light and 2-AAF. In vivo studies revealed that phosphorylation of this site is necessary, at least in part, for appropriate functioning of the p53 protein, since absence of the Ser389 phosphorylation site in mice resulted in increased tumor susceptibility in skin and urinary bladder upon exposure to both UV light or 2-AAF, respectively. In contrast, exposure to ionizing radiation did not result in phosphorylation of Ser389 in vitro and, in turn, not in an increased tumor response in mice lacking the Ser389 site. These results clearly provide evidence for our hypothesis that phosphorylation of Ser389 is important for activation of p53 to exert its function as a tumor suppressor not exclusively upon the presence of UV-induced DNA damage, but also after exposure to other NER-specific agents known to induce bulky adducts. p53 activation upon the presence of these bulky DNA adducts may be triggered by a common signal leading to phosphorylation of p53 at Ser389. It is possible that the blockage of mRNA synthesis by bulky DNA adducts is involved in the induction of this p53 response since it was previously shown that this blockage is involved in p53 activation upon exposure to UV light (32). It remains to be elucidated whether there is also a correlation between the presence of other bulky DNA adducts, like those induced by 2-AAF, inhibition of mRNA synthesis, and subsequent activation of p53.

The absence of the Ser389 phosphorylation event in mice resulted in a less severe cancer phenotype upon UV light radiation compared with the absence of an entire p53 allele (17). In accordance, the 2-AAF carcinogenicity study revealed that homozygous absence of the Ser389 site resulted in a urinary bladder tumor incidence intermediate to that observed in wild-type and p53+/– mice. Apparently, also after exposure to 2-AAF, p53 is still—although to a lesser extent—activated in response to DNA damage in the S389A mutant mice, presumably through other posttranslational modifications. In line with this, other p53 knock-in mouse models with mutations in phosphorylation sites also displayed such intermediate cellular responses, underlining the idea that redundancy of posttranslational modifications occur (33–35). The fact that no increased 2-AAF–induced liver tumor response was found in p53.S389A mice could be explained with our previous study in which we showed that hepatocytes have to be completely devoid of any p53 protein activity to become sensitive to a genotoxic compound in a p53-dependent manner (22). Again, this points towards a redundancy of posttranslational modifications.

In both the UV light and 2-AAF carcinogenicity studies, tumor responses of p53+/– and p53S389A/– mice were not significantly different. Possibly, the absence of a p53 allele already results in such an overt tumor phenotype, that a potential additional effect of lack of Ser389 phosphorylation cannot be detected in these assays. However, the chronic 2-AAF exposure study did not enable the analysis of tumor latency, which might have revealed differences in the onset of 2-AAF-induced urinary bladder tumors in p53+/– and p53S389A/– mice. p53S389A/– mice did show a higher tumor incidence than p53S389A/S389A mice, again indicating that p53 lacking Ser389 phosphorylation is still able to exert some of its tumor-suppressive function.

We and others have previously shown that p53-dependent apoptosis in both bladder and skin tissue is a crucial step in preventing tumor development (22, 36). In addition, p53.S389A mutant cells have a reduced apoptotic response in vitro upon exposure to UV light irradiation (17). Possibly, p53.S389A mice also show a reduced apoptotic response after exposure to either UV light or 2-AAF in vivo, which might result in increased levels of cells with sustained DNA damage, ultimately resulting in an increased mutational load. This might explain the extensive amount of additional p53 mutations observed in both UV-induced skin tumors as well as 2-AAF–induced urinary bladder tumors of p53.S389A mice. Presumably, these mutations are necessary to completely alter p53 function.

The mutations found in UV-induced skin tumors obtained from p53S389A/S389A mice included mutations frequently found in wild-type tumors, like the hotspot mutation at codon 270 (this study and refs. 25–30). Intriguingly, another p53 mutational hotspot, present at high frequency in tumors obtained from UV-irradiated p53S389A/S389A mice, was found at codon 210. This mutation was recently described as a signature for defective NER, since high numbers of this mutation were found in UV-induced skin tumors of Xpc and Xpa mice (26, 37). We and others (38) also detected the Arg-to-Cys mutation at codon 210 in UV-induced skin tumors of wild-type and p53+/– mice, although at a relatively low frequency. Apparently, this mutation is preferentially formed in UV-exposed skins of NER-deficient mice. Since lack of Ser389 phosphorylation results in a p53 mutational phenotype in skin tumors more or less comparable to that observed in NER-deficient mouse models, it is tempting to speculate that phosphorylation of p53 and NER are interrelated. Upon the introduction of NER-specific DNA damage, Ser389 is specifically phosphorylated, resulting in the activation of p53 to induce specific cellular responses. One of these responses might be the activation of NER, either direct or indirectly, resulting in efficient repair of DNA damage. As a result, lack of Ser389 phosphorylation can result in molecular and/or cellular defects also observed in NER-deficient cells and mice. In line, in vitro data also showed evidence that p53 plays a role in the regulation of DNA repair (39). In fact, it has been shown that p53 is required for efficient global genome repair following UV irradiation (40–42). The exact mechanism by which p53 is involved in the NER pathway is not fully understood. p53 has been shown to regulate, at least in human cells, the expression of NER genes such as XPC and p48 (XPE; refs. 43, 44), suggesting that p53 regulates NER through transcriptional activation of genes involved in DNA damage recognition. p53 has also been shown to directly bind certain repair factors, including XPB and XPD, as well as damaged DNA itself, indicating that it may act as a direct repair factor (45–47). This is, however, still inconclusive since no localization of p53 to sites of DNA damage following UV irradiation was found (48). Previously, we have shown that the transactivating activity of the p53 protein upon UV irradiation is impaired in p53.S389A cells (17). Therefore, one can envisage that the p53 protein, activated through phosphorylation of Ser389, is involved in transcriptional activation of NER genes. Although p53 does not regulate p48 in mouse cells (49), it might regulate other genes involved in DNA repair, like Gadd45 or XPC (50).

The studies described here regarding compound-specific phosphorylation of Ser389, reveal new thoughts on p53 activation in general. Possibly, a specific type of DNA damage induced by a class of compounds with a specific mode of action, results in a unique cascade of posttranslational modification events of p53. What these modifications have in common is that p53 is activated, however, the specific p53-induced cellular response will be dependent on the modification pattern of the protein. Of these, cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and the DNA repair responses most favorable for removal of the specific type of DNA damage present in the cell will be most prominent. Future studies exposing p53.S389A mutant mice and cells to other NER-related and non–NER-related DNA damaging agents will be aimed at understanding the relationship between the type of DNA damage, p53 modification, transcriptional activation of target genes, cellular responses, and eventually tumor development.


   Acknowledgments
 
Grant support: Dutch Cancer Society (Koningin Wilhelmina Fonds, RIVM 2000-2352) and NIH/NIEHS (Comparative Mouse Genomics Centers Consortium, 1UO1 ES11044-02).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

We thank the Central Animal Facility (RIVM-CDF) and Coen Moolenbeek for their biotechnological support, and Joke Robinson and Ewoud Speksnijder for assistance with histopathologic analyses.


   Footnotes
 
Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Research Online (http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/).

Received 12/ 3/04. Revised 1/ 7/05. Accepted 2/23/05.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Vousden KH, Lu X. Live or let die: the cell's response to p53. Nat Rev Cancer 2002;2:594–604.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Bargonetti J, Manfredi JJ. Multiple roles of the tumor suppressor p53. Curr Opin Oncol 2002;14:86–91.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Oren M. Decision making by p53: life, death and cancer. Cell Death Differ 2003;10:431–42.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Kubbutat MH, Jones SN, Vousden KH. Regulation of p53 stability by Mdm2. Nature 1997;387:299–303.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Ko LJ, Prives C. p53: puzzle and paradigm. Genes Dev 1996;10:1054–72.[Free Full Text]
  6. Shieh SY, Taya Y, Prives C. DNA damage-inducible phosphorylation of p53 at N-terminal sites including a novel site, Ser20, requires tetramerization. EMBO J 1999;18:1815–23.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Shieh Y, Ahn J, Tamai K, Taya Y, Prives C. The human homologs of checkpoint kinases Chk1 and Cds1 (Chk2) phosphorylate p53 at multiple DNA damage-inducible sites. Genes Dev 2000;14:289–300.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Chehab NH, Malikzay A, Appel M, Halazonetis TD. Chk2/hCds1 functions as a DNA damage checkpoint in G(1) by stabilizing p53. Genes Dev 2000;14:278–88.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Appella E, Anderson CW. Signaling to p53: breaking the posttranslational modification code. Pathol Biol (Paris) 2000;48:227–45.[Medline]
  10. Apella E, Anderson CW. Post-translational modifications and activation of p53 by genotoxic stresses. Eur J Biochem 2001;268:2764–72.[Medline]
  11. Saito S, Yamaguchi H, Higashimoto Y Jr, et al. Phosphorylation site interdependence of human p53 post-translational modifications in response to stress. J Biol Chem 2003;278:37536–44.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Lu H, Taya Y, Ikeda M, Levine A. Ultraviolet radiation by not {gamma} radiation or etoposide-induced DNA damage, results in the phosphorylation of the murine p53 protein at serine-389. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998;95:6399–402.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Kapoor M, Lozano G. Functional activation of p53 via phosphorylation following DNA damage by UV but not {gamma} radiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998;95:2834–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Keller DM, Zeng X, Wang Y, et al. A DNA damage-induced p53 serine 392 kinase complex contains CK2, hSpt16, and SSRP1. Mol Cell 2001;7:283–92.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Huang C, Ma WY, Maxiner A, Sun Y, Dong Z. p38 kinase mediates UV-induced phosphorylation of p53 protein at serine 389. J Biol Chem 1999;274:12229–35.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Cuddihy AR, Wong AH, Tam NW, Li S, Koromilas AE. The double-stranded RNA activated protein kinase PKR physically associates with the tumor suppressor p53 protein and phosphorylates human p53 on serine 392 in vitro. Oncogene 1999;18:2690–702.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Bruins W, Zwart E, Attardi LD, et al. Increased sensitivity to UV radiation in mice with a p53 point mutation at Ser389. Mol Cell Biol 2005;24:8884–94.
  18. Christmann M, Tomicic MT, Roos WP, Kaina B. Mechanisms of human DNA repair: an update. Toxicology 2003;193:3–34.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Friedberg EC. How nucleotide excision repair protects against cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2001;1:22–32.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. van Hoffen A, Balajee AS, van Zeeland AA, Mullenders LH. Nucleotide excision repair and its interplay with transcription. Toxicology 2003;193:79–90.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Jacks T, Remington L, Williams BO, et al. Tumor spectrum analysis in p53-mutant mice. Curr Biol 1994;4:1–7.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Hoogervorst EM, van Oostrom CThM, Beems RB, et al. p53 heterozygocity results in an increased 2-AAF-induced urinary bladder, but not liver tumor response in DNA repair deficient Xpa mice. Cancer Res 2004;64:5118–26.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Kemp CJ, Wheldon T, Balmain A. p53-deficient mice are extremely susceptible to radiation-induced tumorigenesis. Nat Genet 1994;8:66–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Backlund MG, Trasti SL, Backlund DC, Cressman VL, Godfrey V, Koller BH. Impact of ionizing radiation and genetic background on mammary tumorigenesis in p53-deficient mice. Cancer Res 2001;61:6577–82.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Jiang W, Ananthaswamy HN, Muller HK, Kripke ML. p53 protects against skin cancer induction by UV-B radiation. Oncogene 1999;18:4247–53.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Reis AM, Cheo DL, Meira LB, et al. Genotype-specific Trp53 mutational analysis in ultraviolet B radiation-induced skin cancers in Xpc and Xpc Trp53 mutant mice. Cancer Res 2000;60:1571–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Kanjilal S, Pierceall WE, Cummings KK, Kripke ML, Ananthaswamy HN. High frequency of p53 mutations in ultraviolet radiation-induced murine skin tumors: evidence for strand bias and tumor heterogeneity. Cancer Res 1993;53:2961–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Kress S, Sutter C, Strickland PT, Mukhtar H, Schweizer J, Schwarz M. Carcinogen-specific mutational pattern in the p53 gene in ultraviolet B radiation-induced squamous cell carcinomas of mouse skin. Cancer Res 1992;52:6400–3.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. van Kranen HJ, de Gruijl FR, de Vries A, et al. Frequent p53 alterations but low incidence of ras mutations in UV-B-induced skin tumors of hairless mice. Carcinogenesis 1995;16:1141–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Dumaz N, van Kranen HJ, de Vries A, et al. The role of UV-B light in skin carcinogenesis through the analysis of p53 mutations in squamous cell carcinomas of hairless mice. Carcinogenesis 1997;18:897–904.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Mellon I, Spivak G, Hanawalt PC. Selective removal of transcription-blocking DNA damage from the transcribed strand of the mammalian DHFR gene. Cell 1987;51:241–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Ljungman M, Zhang F, Chen F, Rainbow AJ, McKay B. Inhibition of RNA polymerase II as a trigger for the p53 response. Oncogene 1999;18:583–92.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Chao C, Hergenhahn M, Kaeser MD, et al. Cell type- and promoter-specific roles of Ser18 phosphorylation in regulating p53 responses. J Biol Chem 2003;42:41028–33.
  34. Sluss HK, Armata H, Gallant J, Jones SN. Phosphorylation of serine 18 regulates distinct p53 functions in mice. Mol Cell Biol 2004;24:976–84.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. MacPherson D, Kim J, Kim T, et al. Defective apoptosis and B-cell lymphomas in mice with p53 point mutation at Ser 23. EMBO J 2004;23:3689–99.[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Ziegler A, Jonason AS, Leffel DJ, et al. Sunburn and p53 in the onset of skin cancer. Nature 1994;372:773–6.[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Takeuchi S, Nakatsu Y, Nakane H, et al. Strand specificity and absence of hot spots for p53 mutations in ultraviolet B-induced skin tumors of XPA-deficient mice. Cancer Res 1998;58:641–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. van Kranen HJ, Westerman A, Berg RJW, et al. Dose-dependent effects of UVB-induced skin carcinogenesis in hairless p53 knockout mice. Mutation Res 2005;571:81–90.
  39. Adimoolam S, Ford JM. p53 and regulation of DNA damage recognition during nucleotide excision repair. DNA Repair (Amst) 2003;2:947–54.
  40. Ford JM, Hanawalt PC. Expression of wild-type p53 is required for efficient global genomic nucleotide excision repair in UV-irradiated human fibroblasts. J Biol Chem 1997;272:28073–80.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Ford JM, Hanawalt PC. Li-Fraumeni syndrome fibroblasts homozygous for p53 mutations are deficient in global DNA repair but exhibit normal transcription-coupled repair and enhanced UV resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995;92:8876–80.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Zhu Q, Wani MA, El-Mahdy M, Wani AA. Decreased DNA repair efficiency by loss or disruption of p53 function preferentially affects removal of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers from non-transcribed strand and slow repair sites in transcribed strand. J Biol Chem 2000;275:11492–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Adimoolam S, Ford JM. p53 and DNA-damage-inducible expression of the xeroderma pigmentosum group C gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99:12985–90.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Hwang BJ, Ford JM, Hanawalt PC, Chu G. Expression of the p48 xeroderma pigmentosum gene is p53-dependent and is involved in global genomic repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999;96:424–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Wang XW, Yeh H, Schaeffer L, et al. p53 modulation of TFIIH-associated nucleotide excision repair activity. Nat Gent 1995;10:188–95.[Medline]
  46. Lee S, Cavallo L, Griffith J. Human p53 binds Holliday junctions strongly and facilitates their cleavage. J Biol Chem 1997;272:7532–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Jayaraman J, Prives C. Activation of p53 sequence-specific DNA binding by short single strands of DNA requires the p53 C-terminus. Cell 1995;81:1021–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. Fitch ME, Cross IV, Ford JM. p53 responsive nucleotide excision repair gene products p48 and XPC, but not p53, localize to sites of UV-irradiation-induced DNA damage, in vivo. Carcinogenesis 2003;24:843–50.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Tan T, Chu G. p53 Binds and activates the xeroderma pigmentosum DDB2 gene in humans but not mice. Mol Cell Biol 2002;22:3247–54.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Hollander MC, Alamo I, Jackman J, Wang MG, McBride OW, Fornace AJ. Analysis of the mammalian gadd45 gene and its response to DNA damage. J Biol Chem 1993;268:24385–93.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
W. Bruins, O. Bruning, M. J. Jonker, E. Zwart, T. V. van der Hoeven, J. L. A. Pennings, H. Rauwerda, A. de Vries, and T. M. Breit
The Absence of Ser389 Phosphorylation in p53 Affects the Basal Gene Expression Level of Many p53-Dependent Genes and Alters the Biphasic Response to UV Exposure in Mouse Embryonic Fibroblasts
Mol. Cell. Biol., March 15, 2008; 28(6): 1974 - 1987.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Gen. Virol.Home page
B. Oster, B. Bundgaard, T. R. Hupp, and P. Hollsberg
Human herpesvirus 6B induces phosphorylation of p53 in its regulatory domain by a CK2- and p38-independent pathway
J. Gen. Virol., January 1, 2008; 89(1): 87 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 CarcinogenesisHome page
W. Bruins, M. J. Jonker, O. Bruning, J. L.A. Pennings, M. M. Schaap, E. M. Hoogervorst, H. van Steeg, T. M. Breit, and A. de Vries
Delayed expression of apoptotic and cell-cycle control genes in carcinogen-exposed bladders of mice lacking p53.S389 phosphorylation
Carcinogenesis, August 1, 2007; 28(8): 1814 - 1823.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
S. W.P. Wijnhoven, E. N. Speksnijder, X. Liu, E. Zwart, C. Th. M. vanOostrom, R. B. Beems, E. M. Hoogervorst, M. M. Schaap, L. D. Attardi, T. Jacks, et al.
Dominant-Negative but not Gain-of-Function Effects of a p53.R270H Mutation in Mouse Epithelium Tissue after DNA Damage
Cancer Res., May 15, 2007; 67(10): 4648 - 4656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Mol. Biol. CellHome page
O. Moiseeva, F. A. Mallette, U. K. Mukhopadhyay, A. Moores, and G. Ferbeyre
DNA Damage Signaling and p53-dependent Senescence after Prolonged beta-Interferon Stimulation
Mol. Biol. Cell, April 1, 2006; 17(4): 1583 - 1592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoogervorst, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by de Vries, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoogervorst, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by de Vries, A.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online