| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Reviews |
Department of Immunology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Requests for reprints: Olivera J. Finn, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, E1040 Biomedical Science Tower, Pittsburgh, PA 15261. Phone: 412-648-9816; Fax: 412-648-7042; E-mail: ojfinn{at}pitt.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Unlike normal cells that turn on transient expression of minute amounts of cyclin proteins at specific points in the cell cycle, many tumors have high constitutive levels of one or more cyclins. In normal and tumor cells, cyclins are ubiquitinated for immediate degradation by proteasomes into peptides. This same degradation pathway is used for processing and presentation of antigens to the immune system. It would thus be expected that immunosurveillance of cyclin peptides presented by normal cells, where they appear transiently and probably below the threshold of immune detection, would differ significantly from those presented by cancer cells, where the peptides are constitutively present at high levels, presumably reaching the threshold for immune recognition.
We and others have found that at least one member of the cyclin family, cyclin B1, plays an important role as a tumor antigen. Cyclin B1 is recognized by the immune system early in cancer development, and both antibodies and T cells are generated in response to its aberrant expression. In this review, we use our knowledge of cyclin B1 regulation and expression in cancer and its documented tumor antigen potential as a template to assess the potential of other aberrantly expressed cyclins to be recognized by the immune system. Because cyclins are expected to be deregulated early in disease, we propose that monitoring immune responses against cyclins that are recognized as tumor antigens can be an important approach to early cancer detection (2). Furthermore, because cyclin deregulation is associated with increased tumor malignancy (3), we suggest that eliciting or boosting immunity to tumor cyclins through vaccines or other immunotherapy approaches could lead to the elimination of the most malignant cancer cells and thus to a more favorable disease outcome.
| Cyclin B1, the Prototype Cyclin Tumor Antigen |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| Other Cyclins as Tumor Antigens |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A, D, and E type cyclins all have been shown to be overexpressed in many cancers, where their overexpression has been associated frequently with poor clinical outcome. Like cyclin B1, these cyclins undergo ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis and could, therefore, be available as whole proteins as well as processed peptides for presentation to the immune system. However, whether or not these other peptides can effectively stimulate the immune response will depend on the precise molecular mechanisms that underlie the aberrant expression of each of the individual cyclins and on the extent of quantitative and qualitative differences in their expression between normal and cancer cells. Thus, some cyclins may be anticipated to be more immunogenic or better immunotherapy targets than others. Using the criteria we and others have determined to be important for cyclin B1 immunogenicity and tumor specificity, it is possible to examine alterations in the expression and localization of cyclins D, E, and A in cancer as a way to evaluate their potential to alter antigen loading at the cancer cell surface or provide increased levels of protein for cross-presentation by antigen presenting cells.
D type cyclins. Cyclin D1 is the most commonly reported overexpressed cyclin in cancer and the best characterized of the D type cyclins (D1, D2, and D3). Cyclin D1 overexpression has often been found to correlate with worse disease prognosis (13). As in the case of cyclin B1, cytoplasmic localization of aberrantly expressed cyclin D1 protein has been noted in nonsmall cell lung cancer. However, in the majority of tumors, overexpressed cyclin D1 protein resides primarily in the nucleus (13). Processing and presentation of antigens overexpressed in the nucleus have not been studied extensively; thus, the effect of cyclin D1 nuclear overexpression on peptide loading into MHC class I and consequent increase in its tumor antigen potential will have to be specifically determined. Studies to date exploring the potential of cyclin D1 to stimulate immune responses include one report that 16% of patients with high-grade prostate cancer make T celldependent anti-cyclin D1 antibodies (14). Given the frequently documented cyclin D1 overexpression in cancer, additional studies of the immune response in cancer patients to this potential new tumor antigen are warranted.
E type cyclins. Along with cyclin D1, the cyclins E1 and E2 direct and amplify the transition of cells from G1 phase into S phase of the cell cycle. Cyclin E1 has been more extensively studied and has been frequently found to be deregulated in tumor cells. As in the case of cyclins B1 and D1, deregulation of cyclin E1 has been reported to be associated with worse prognosis in lung and breast cancers (reviewed in ref. 15). Multiple mechanisms underlying increased expression of cyclin E1 are possible, including gene amplification, disruption of Rb transcription regulatory pathways, and errors in ubiquitination and degradation processes (16). Furthermore, there are low molecular weight forms of cyclin E that are produced at high levels only in cancers and can serve as a source of antigenic peptides (17). Cyclin E appearance is normally tightly restricted to mid-G1 phase to S phase of the cell cycle. In contrast, in several bladder cancer cell lines, cyclin E has been found to be present throughout the cell cycle (18). This transition to unscheduled expression suggests the possibility of higher levels of cell surface presentation of cyclin Ederived peptides due to increased accessibility to antigen processing machinery. However, aberrantly expressed cyclin E is constitutively localized to the nucleoli rather than the cytoplasm; thus, it is postulated to be retained and not degraded (18). If the major mechanism for this aberrant expression is a lack of degradation, then cyclin E is unlikely to be seen by the immune system as a tumor antigen. The accumulated protein can still be released by tumor cells and taken up by antigen-presenting cells and B cells to stimulate helper T cells and production of anti-cyclin E antibodies. However, in the only published study to date, that has evaluated the presence of antibodies to cyclin E in sera from cancer patients, none of the patients tested had anti-cyclin E antibodies (4).
A type cyclins. Cyclins A1 and A2 activate cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (cdk2) and cdk1 and function to promote transit through S phase and into mitosis. Cyclin A1, the expression of which is confined mainly to hematopoietic progenitor cells and male germ cells, has been found to be highly overexpressed in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and testicular cancer (15). AML patients whose tumors had high levels of cyclin A1 have significantly lower survival than those with low levels of cyclin A1 (19). In normal hematopoietic cells, cyclin A1 is predominantly nuclear; however, in leukemic cell lines and tumor cells from AML patients, cyclin A1 is predominantly cytoplasmic (20). Overexpression of cyclin A2, which is expressed in all dividing somatic cells, has also been associated with poor prognosis in several cancers (15). Thus far, nothing much is known about immune responses to A type cyclins in patients with AML or other tumors of hematopoietic origin. However, two recent reports describe antibodies to cyclin A2 in sera of patients with solid tumors (4, 14). Although there is relatively limited information on cyclin A, its alteration in cancers similar to cyclin B1 should prompt further attention concerning cyclin A as a potentially important tumor antigen.
| Summary |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Received 9/20/05. Revised 10/24/05. Accepted 11/ 4/05.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Z. Tombol, P. M Szabo, V. Molnar, Z. Wiener, G. Tolgyesi, J. Horanyi, P. Riesz, P. Reismann, A. Patocs, I. Liko, et al. Integrative molecular bioinformatics study of human adrenocortical tumors: microRNA, tissue-specific target prediction, and pathway analysis Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2009; 16(3): 895 - 906. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Sorensen, R. S. Andersen, I. M. Svane, L. Engell-Noerregaard, S. R. Hadrup, E. Balslev, M. H. Andersen, and P. t. Straten CD8 T-cell Responses against Cyclin B1 in Breast Cancer Patients with Tumors Overexpressing p53 Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2009; 15(5): 1543 - 1549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Kondo, B. Maecker, M. R. Weihrauch, C. Wickenhauser, W. Zeng, L. M. Nadler, J. L. Schultze, and M. S. von Bergwelt-Baildon Cyclin D1-Specific Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes Are Present in the Repertoire of Cancer Patients: Implications for Cancer Immunotherapy Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2008; 14(20): 6574 - 6579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Goodell, J. Waisman, L. G. Salazar, C. dela Rosa, J. Link, A. L. Coveler, J. S. Childs, P. A. Fintak, D. M. Higgins, and M. L. Disis Level of HER-2/neu protein expression in breast cancer may affect the development of endogenous HER-2/neu-specific immunity Mol. Cancer Ther., March 1, 2008; 7(3): 449 - 454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Liu, W. Li, T. Fujita, Q. Yang, and Y. Wan Proteolysis of CDH1 enhances susceptibility to UV radiation-induced apoptosis Carcinogenesis, February 1, 2008; 29(2): 263 - 272. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Domchek, A. Recio, R. Mick, C. E. Clark, E. L. Carpenter, K. R. Fox, A. DeMichele, L. M. Schuchter, M. S. Leibowitz, M. H. Wexler, et al. Telomerase-Specific T-Cell Immunity in Breast Cancer: Effect of Vaccination on Tumor Immunosurveillance Cancer Res., November 1, 2007; 67(21): 10546 - 10555. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. V. Heemers, T. J. Sebo, J. D. Debes, K. M. Regan, K. A. Raclaw, L. M. Murphy, A. Hobisch, Z. Culig, and D. J. Tindall Androgen Deprivation Increases p300 Expression in Prostate Cancer Cells Cancer Res., April 1, 2007; 67(7): 3422 - 3430. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |