Cancer Research Cell Death Mechanisms and Cancer Therapy Telomeres
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Joncker, N. T.
Right arrow Articles by Lantz, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Joncker, N. T.
Right arrow Articles by Lantz, O.
[Cancer Research 66, 5443-5451, May 15, 2006]
© 2006 American Association for Cancer Research

Immunology

Intratumor CD4 T-Cell Accumulation Requires Stronger Priming than for Expansion and Lymphokine Secretion

Nathalie T. Joncker, Julie Helft, Alexandra Jacquet, Virginie Premel and Olivier Lantz

Laboratoire d'Immunologie pré-clinique, Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale U653, Institut Curie, Paris, France

Requests for reprints: Olivier Lantz, Laboratoire d'Immunologie pré-clinique, Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale U653, Institut Curie, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France. Phone: 33-144-324-218; Fax: 33-144-324-444; E-mail: Olivier.lantz{at}curie.net.


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
T cells need to migrate to and accumulate inside tumors before mediating rejection of the tumor. The number of specific T cells inside tumors may depend on the efficiency of priming in the draining lymph node (DLN), intratumor deletion, suppressive phenomena, or both. We used monoclonal anti-male antigen CD4 (Marilyn) T cells and tumor cell lines expressing or not the corresponding antigen (Dby) to analyze CD4 T-cell accumulation in tumors. Priming by MHC II+ or MHC II– male splenocytes or Dby+ tumor cells induced similar Marilyn T-cell expansion in the DLN and recirculation in other lymph nodes and capacity to produce IFN-{gamma}. However, intratumor accumulation was different for each priming condition. In mice with Dby– tumors, MHC II+ male splenocyte priming induced greater, although not statistically significant, Marilyn T-cell accumulation in the tumors than MHC II– male splenocyte priming. In mice with Dby+ tumors, priming in the tumor DLN induced less Marilyn T-cell intratumor accumulation than priming by MHC II+ male splenocytes. We saw comparable differences for Marilyn T-cell accumulation in gut lamina propria, suggesting that priming affects effector T-cell accumulation in inflamed tissues. Mature dendritic cells were loaded with graded doses of Dby peptide to control for antigen-presenting cell characteristics during priming. We observed similar proliferation, with higher concentrations inducing higher intratumor accumulation. Thus, intratumor accumulation requires stronger stimulation than for proliferation or the capacity to secrete lymphokines. In this system, priming intensity alone can explain the number of intratumor T cells without having to call for intratumor deletion or suppression phenomena. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(10): 5443-51)


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
As well as helping CD8 T cells to become efficient cytotoxic cells, CD4 T cells can also mediate the rejection of skin grafts (1), kidney grafts (2), or tumors (3–6). The migration of the specific T lymphocytes into the tumor bed is one of the first steps in tumor rejection by the immune system. First, naive T cells in the tumor draining lymph node (DLN) must be activated by specific peptide-MHC complexes on professional antigen-presenting cells (APC) that have captured the antigen at the tumor site or in the tumor DLN (7–9). Then, the activated T cells either recirculate through the different lymphoid organs or migrate into nonlymphoid inflamed tissues (10–12). Activated T-cell migration into tissues relies on the modification of their chemokine receptors and integrin expression profiles (13–15). The survival of activated T cells implies they express Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and survivin, and it has been shown that the involvement of costimulatory molecules during T-cell activation is an important variable that regulates this process (16, 17).

Antigenic stimulation strength is a function of the concentration and involvement of costimulatory molecules, the duration of antigen stimulation, and the number of peptide-MHC complexes present on each APC. Indeed, in vitro, when more peptide-MHC complexes are expressed per APC, activated T cells divide more and acquire a greater cytokine secretion capacity (18–22). In vivo, it is more difficult to control the amount of peptide-MHC complexes per APC. Therefore, its influence on T-cell migration and accumulation in nonlymphoid tissues is poorly understood, especially for tumors. Many studies have been carried out using replicating pathogens, peptides, or whole protein antigens in complete Freund's adjuvant (CFA) (10, 11, 23). According to the progressive differentiation model, the T cells that divide the most are those that emigrate from secondary lymphoid organs to nonlymphoid tissues (12, 24–26).

We have shown previously that anti-male TCR transgenic Marilyn monoclonal (RAG2–/–) CD4 T cells, which recognize the Dby epitope in I-Ab molecules, can induce rejection of male skin grafts in the absence of direct antigen recognition on the graft cells (1). Male skin grafts with a nonrestricting MHC haplotype were rejected if the host displayed the restricting MHC haplotype. In another study using the same transgenic CD4 T cells and male heart grafts not bearing the restricting MHC haplotype, specific T cells primed through the indirect presentation pathway were shown to migrate to the donor organ (27). Altogether, these results highlight the role of the indirect presentation of antigens by the host APCs in inducing effector functions and graft rejection and suggest that the target for rejection is the vascular endothelium of the graft. Many tumors do not express MHC II, MHC I, or both on the cell surface. Therefore, T-cell antitumor responses should be generated through the indirect presentation of tumor antigens by host APCs. We wondered whether the results from skin or heart grafts could also apply to solid tumors. Indeed, it is difficult to assess whether poor tumor rejection observed in some antigen-expressing tumor experimental models is only due to inefficient intratumor T-cell migration and accumulation caused by a poor priming or whether it is due to intratumor phenomena, such as suppression or deletion or a nonpermissive tumor vascular endothelium.

Using the above-mentioned Marilyn TCR transgenic and a Dby-transfected MHC II– fibrosarcoma, we have shown previously that as long as the T cells are efficiently primed elsewhere antigen does not need to be expressed by the tumor cells for the T cells to accumulate in the tumor bed (26). In the present study, we have used this fully controlled system in which the antigen is present or not in the tumor to dissociate priming influence from intratumor antigen-specific phenomena influence on intratumor CD4 T-cell accumulation. When T cells are primed in the Dby+ tumor DLN, we observed a poor intratumor accumulation within the tumor, whereas priming with APCs loaded with high doses of antigen peptide led to increased accumulation of CD4 T cells in the tumors.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mice. The Marilyn TCR transgenic mice on a RAG-deficient background have been described elsewhere (28) and recognize the I-Ab-restricted male Dby peptide NAGFNSNRANSSRSS using a V{alpha}1.1/Vß6 TCR. Marilyn mice were used as a source of monoclonal specific CD4 T cells. Female CD45.2 C57BL/6 (B6) mice from IffaCredo (L'abresle, France) and CD45.1 B6 mice from the Centre de Distribution, Typage et Archivage, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (Orléans, France) were used as recipients. Cells from CD45.1 and CD45.2 Marilyn mice were used for adoptive transfer in CD45.2 and CD45.1 B6 mice, respectively. Male and female CD3{varepsilon}–/– mice and male I-Aß–/– mice (Centre de Distribution, Typage et Archivage, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique) were used as a source of splenocytes for the footpad immunizations. Live animal experiments were carried out in accordance with the guidelines of the French Veterinary Department.

Cell lines. MCA-101 is a methylcholantrene-induced fibrosarcoma that does not express the male HY antigen. MCA-101 was transfected with Dby cDNA as described previously (26). Cells were cultured in complete DMEM. For MCA-101-Dby, this was supplemented with 0.5 mg/mL neomycin (Invitrogen, Cergy Pontoise, France).

Mouse experiments. Tumor cells (2 x 105) in a 100 µL volume of PBS-0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) were injected i.d. onto the left flank of normal CD45.1 or CD45.2 female B6 mice. After 5 days, 1 x 106 cells from Marilyn lymph nodes labeled with 5,6-carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) as described previously (29) were injected i.v. into the tumor-bearing mice. The following day (day 0), 3 x 106 female or male CD3{varepsilon}–/– or male I-Aß–/– splenocytes in a 50 µL volume of PBS-0.5% BSA were injected into the hind footpad in half of the mice. After 5 or 15 days, the tumors and the lymph nodes were harvested and the number and phenotype of the monoclonal T cells were studied. When indicated, 2 x 106 bone marrow–derived dendritic cells (BMDC) from female B6 pulsed with Dby peptide were used as stimulatory cells at day 0. BMDCs were generated by culture in granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor–containing Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium for 10 days; fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis of the cell population revealed >75% CD11c+ cells. All BMDCs were matured by incubation with 10 µg/mL lipopolysaccharide (LPS; Sigma, Lyon, France) for 16 hours at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. BMDCs from female B6 mice were pulsed with 2, 40, or 800 nmol/L or 4 µmol/L Dby peptide for 3 hours at 37°C, 5% CO2.

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte isolation. Mouse tumors were harvested and stored in PBS-0.5% BSA. Tumors were then weighed, cut into small pieces, and resuspended in CO2-independent medium (2.5 mL for 200 mg tissue) containing 20% FCS, 1 mg/mL collagenase D (Roche, Mannheim, Germany), and 25 µg/mL DNase I (Sigma). This was then agitated at 250 rpm for 90 minutes at 37°C with vigorous pipetting every 20 minutes. The cell suspension was then filtered trough a 40-µm cell strainer (Becton Dickinson, Le Pont-De-Claix, France) and washed in PBS-0.5% BSA. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) were isolated on a lympholyte M (Cedarlane, Hornby, Ontario, Canada) gradient (100% and 75%) in DMEM from 100% to 75% interface and washed in PBS-0.5% BSA.

Gut lamina propria lymphocytes isolation. Briefly, the gut was flushed with PBS to remove the intestinal content. After removing Peyer's patches, the intestine was opened longitudinally and washed several times in PBS. The epithelium was eliminated by incubating 5-cm pieces twice in 60 mL PBS plus 3 mmol/L EDTA for 10 minutes at 37°C, under shaking, and then twice in 15 mL CO2-independent medium plus 1 mmol/L EGTA and 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2 for 15 minutes at 37°C, under shaking. The gut pieces were cut in 0.5-cm pieces and stirred for 90 minutes at 37°C in 30 mL CO2-independent medium supplemented with 20% FCS, 100 units/mL collagenase (Sigma), and 5 units/mL DNase I. In the middle and at the end of the incubation, the suspension was flushed several times through a syringe to increase dissociation. After centrifugation, the pellet was washed and filtered through a 22-µm cell strainer and the lamina propria lymphocytes were separated by centrifugation over lympholyte M (1:1).

Flow cytometric analysis. Cell suspensions were stained (CFSE or FITC/phycoerythrin/Cy/APC) as follows: (a) CFSE/CD45.1/ßTCR/CD44, (b) CFSE/CD45.2/ßTCR/CD44, (c) CD45.1/IFN-{gamma}/ßTCR/CD4, (d) CFSE/Bcl-2/ßTCR/CD45.2, and (e) CFSE/Bcl-xL/ßTCR/CD45.2. For combination c, IFN-{gamma} was detected using a specific detection kit (see below). For combinations d and e, the intracellular staining for Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL were carried out using a BD PharMingen Cytofix/Cytoperm kit according to the manufacturer's instructions. Antibodies were from BD PharMingen (Le Pont-De-Claix, France), except for anti-Bcl-xL, which was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Acquisition was carried out on a FACSCalibur cytometer (Becton Dickinson) using CellQuest version 3.3 software.

IFN-{gamma} secretion assay. IFN-{gamma} secretion assay was carried out using the mouse IFN-{gamma} secretion detection kit (phycoerythrin) from Miltenyi Biotec (Paris, France) according to the manufacturer's instructions. T cells were restimulated in vivo by incubation for 16 hours at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere in complete RPMI 1640 supplemented with 5% mouse serum and 100 nmol/L Dby peptide.

Statistical analysis. The data were normalized as log10-transformed values in most statistical tests because of the high dispersion of some variables (30). Student's t tests or Mann-Whitney U tests were carried out as appropriate. Nonsignificant differences (P > 0.05) are denoted n.s.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Characterization of the tumor system. We have described previously a stable transfected MCA-101 fibrosarcoma cell line expressing the Dby protein (MCA-101-Dby) that generates the male antigen epitope recognized by Marilyn transgenic T cells and that is able to stimulate Marilyn T cells in vivo (26). Implantation of the Dby+ or of the parental cell lines into female and male B6 mice led to similar tumor growth (data not shown). When implanted into Marilyn mice, the Dby+ cell line growth in the absence of previous male cell priming was similar to the parental cell line growth initiated after a male cell immunization (Fig. 1A ). In contrast, after male cell immunization, the Dby+ tumors were smaller at all time points (P < 0.001) and grew slower (comparison of the slope of tumor growth; P < 0.0001) by comparison with the two other groups (Fig. 1A), suggesting some specific tumor rejection. Like most human tumors, the MCA-101 fibrosarcoma cell line does not express MHC II molecules. This is true in culture in vitro, even after IFN-{gamma} treatment (data not shown), and ex vivo (Fig. 1B). Therefore, the Dby antigen should be captured by the host APCs to prime the specific T cells in the tumor DLN through indirect antigen presentation (1, 7, 31). We assessed the amount of antigen expressed by the tumor cells by injecting graded numbers of cells into the footpad of B6 mice into which Marilyn T cells had been transferred previously. We used MHC II+ and MHC II– (I-Aß–/–) male splenocytes as controls. For the Dby+ tumor cells and the MHC II– male splenocytes, priming has to occur through indirect antigen presentation on host APCs. We observed that Marilyn T-cell activation (CD69+) at 36 hours was a function of the number of injected cells and was similar for the three cell types (Dby+ tumor and MHC II+ and MHC II– male splenocytes; Fig. 1C and D), indicating similar amounts of antigen per stimulating APC for each group. These results show that Marilyn T cells display some antitumor activity and that MCA-101-Dby cells express enough antigen to be the target of rejection. Moreover, for a given number of antigen-expressing cells, direct and indirect antigen presentation result in a similar early and transitory CD69 expression.


Figure 1
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 1. MCA-101-Dby tumor cells induce activation of specific Marilyn CD4 T cells. A, Marilyn mice were previously or not primed with male splenocytes and challenged 5 days later with the parental MCA-101 tumor (Dby– Tumor) or the antigen (Dby)–transfected MCA-101-Dby tumor (Dby+ Tumor) to analyze tumor growth. Data have been censored when the first mouse among the three groups died. Points, mean of six to eight mice per group; bars, SE. *, P < 0.001, statistically significant differences between the male cell immunized Dby+ tumor group and the two other groups (Student's t test). The growth rates as estimated by the slopes were also significantly different (P < 0.0001) between the same groups. B, MHC class II cell surface staining of the parental (MCA-101; Dby– Tumor) and antigen (Dby)–transfected (MCA-101-Dby; Dby+ Tumor) cell lines ex vivo (15 days of tumor growth). C, 1 x 106 T cells from Marilyn mice lymph nodes were adoptively transferred into B6 mice and locally stimulated 1 day later by injection of tumor or spleen cells into the footpad. Expression of the early activation marker, CD69, was assessed by flow cytometry 36 hours after immunization and number of CD69+ Marilyn T cells in lymph nodes draining the immunization was calculated (D).

 
Both direct and indirect antigen presentation induce Marilyn CD4 T cells priming. The absence of rejection of the Dby+ tumor in the absence of additional priming (Fig. 1A) suggests that the growing Dby+ tumor is not very effective at priming Marilyn T cells despite inducing a similar expression of CD69 on the transgenic T cells when the same number of male cells is injected (Fig. 1C and D). Efficient priming should induce proliferation, a capacity to produce lymphokines and the recirculation of T cells into secondary lymphoid organs and nonlymphoid peripheral tissues, including tumors. Therefore, we analyzed this using Marilyn T cells transferred into B6 adoptive hosts (that have normal lymphoid organs) and different priming methods to assess the priming efficiency of Dby+ tumors. MCA-101 fibrosarcoma or its Dby-transfected relative was implanted into B6 mice, which were injected 5 days later with CFSE-labeled Marilyn T cells. The following day, some of the mice were immunized with MHC II+ or MHC II– male or female splenocytes injected into the Dby– tumor contralateral hind footpad (Fig. 2A ). We then determined the number and phenotype of the Marilyn T cells in the different lymphoid organs and tumor 5 or 15 days after T-cell priming.


Figure 2
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 2. Both direct and indirect antigen presentation induce Marilyn CD4 T cells proliferation, lymphokine secretion, and recirculation. A, Marilyn T-cell adoptive transfer and tumor challenge model as described in Materials and Methods. B, activation and proliferation profiles of Marilyn T cells in male immunization and Dby+ tumor DLN. Marilyn T cells are gated on CD45.1 congenic marker and ß-TCR+ cells. Number of divided Marilyn T cells in imm-DLN or tumor DLN at (C) day 5 and (D) day 15. The number of divided (one division and more as assessed by CFSE profile) Marilyn T cells was normalized to the total cell number in the DLN. E, 15 days after immunization, the ability of Marilyn T cells to secrete IFN-{gamma} after in vitro restimulation with Dby peptide was assessed by flow cytometry as described in Materials and Methods. Marilyn T cells were gated on CD45.1+ and CD4+ cells. Representative of two experiments (using three mice per group). Number of divided Marilyn T cells in non-DLN after priming in the imm-DLN or tumor DLN at (F) day 5 and (G) day 15. Statistical significance is only shown when at least one comparison is significant.

 
We observed a large proliferation of Marilyn T cells in the lymph nodes draining either MHC II+ or MHC II– male splenocytes as well as in the lymph nodes draining Dby+ tumors (Fig. 2B). The number of divided T cells in the tumor DLN (mean ± SE, 0.1 ± 0.13 x 106) 5 days after T-cell priming was slightly lower than in the lymph nodes draining MHC II+ cells (imm-DLN; mean ± SE, 0.4 ± 0.14 x 106; P = 0.002; Fig. 2C). However, 15 days after priming, the number of divided Marilyn T cells was similar in the groups primed by Dby+ tumor and MHC II+ male splenocytes, whereas it was slightly lower after priming by MHC II– male splenocytes (Fig. 2D). Thus, although the amount of antigen per cell was similar in all three groups (Fig. 1C and D), the growing Dby+ tumors induce only slightly less Marilyn T-cell proliferation than MHC II+ male splenocytes. Altogether, these results indicate that the induction of Marilyn T-cell proliferation by indirect antigen presentation after injection of tumor cells or MHC II– splenocytes is almost as efficient as the induction by direct antigen presentation.

The three types of immunization enabled the stimulated Marilyn T cells recovered from the DLN 15 days after priming to secrete IFN-{gamma} after specific restimulation in vitro (Fig. 2E), indicating that the Dby+ tumor cells, and the MHC II+ and MHC II– male splenocytes were all equally efficient at inducing effector functions in Marilyn T cells.

Another measure of priming efficiency is the ability of activated T cells to recirculate to other lymph nodes (non-DLN) away from the immunization site. Before day 5 after priming, only activated Marilyn T cells that have undergone more than four cell divisions are able to reach the non-DLN. After day 5, most of the cells found in the non-DLN have divided more than six times, although a few that have divided less are also found (26). Here, we found similar numbers of divided Marilyn T cells in the non-DLN at both days 5 and 15 after priming irrespective of the cell type used for priming (Fig. 2F and G). These results show that 5 days after priming Dby+ tumor cells induce effector Marilyn T-cell recirculation in non-DLN as efficiently as MHC II+ and MHC II– male splenocytes despite there being a slightly lower expansion of the cell population in tumor DLN.

Intratumor T-cell accumulation varies depending on the priming method. T cells have to migrate into tissues to mediate their specific effector functions. Therefore, we measured the number of Marilyn T cells and examined their CFSE phenotype in either Dby– or Dby+ tumors 5 and 15 days after priming with either MHC II+ or MHC II– male splenocytes (Fig. 3 ). In all priming conditions, we found only CFSE-negative cells in the tumors (Fig. 3A; data not shown), indicating that the activated Marilyn T cells had divided at least six times to be able to migrate into and/or survive in the tumor. As observed previously (26), the number of Marilyn T cells was similar in Dby– (13.9 ± 1.4% at day 5 and 8.5 ± 2.8% at day 15) and Dby+ (8.2 ± 1.5% at day 5 and 11.3 ± 1.5% at day 15) tumors after priming with MHC II+ male splenocytes, whereas in Dby+ tumors the number of Marilyn T cells was lower in the absence of additional priming (2.2 ± 1.8%; P = 0.018 at day 5 and 1.5 ± 2.5%; P = 0.008 at day 15). We also found that the number of Marilyn T cells in the Dby– tumor after priming with MHC II– male splenocytes was low (3.9 ± 2.5% at day 5 and 3.4 ± 2.9% at day 15) although not statistically different from the Dby– tumor after priming with MHC II+ male splenocytes. Thus, the poor intratumor accumulation of Marilyn T cells observed in Dby+ tumors may be due to the low priming capacity of indirect antigen presentation.


Figure 3
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 3. Intratumor T-cell accumulation varies according to the priming method. A, intratumor accumulation of Marilyn T cells was assessed at day 15 by flow cytometry on explanted tumor cell suspensions. Marilyn T cells were gated on CD45.1+ and ßTCR+ cells (R1) and endogenous B6 T cells were gated on CD45.1– and ßTCR+ cells (R2). B, intratumor accumulation of Marilyn T cells at days 5 and 15 plotted as the percentage of Marilyn T cells (R1) among total TILs (R1 + R2) present in the tumor to take into account variations in tumor size and processing sample yield.

 
The lower number of Marilyn T cells observed in Dby+ tumors compared with Dby– tumors in mice immunized with MHC II+ male splenocytes is definitely not related to antigen-specific intratumor mechanisms, such as deletion or suppression, for two reasons. Firstly, the number of Marilyn T cells was similar in both Dby– or Dby+ tumors after MHC II+ male splenocyte priming (Fig. 3B). Secondly, we did an experiment in which Dby– and Dby+ tumors were grafted onto the same mouse and were immunized or not with MHC II+ male splenocytes (Fig. 4A ). At day 12, without MHC II+ male immunization, 1.3 ± 0.9% of the TILs in the Dby– tumor and 0.8 ± 0.4% of the TILs in the Dby+ tumor were Marilyn T cells that had been primed by the Dby+ tumor. After MHC II+ male immunization, 25 ± 5% and 22 ± 6.7% of total TILs in Dby– and Dby+ tumors were Marilyn T cells, respectively (Fig. 4B). The similar numbers of Marilyn T cells present in Dby– or Dby+ tumors according to the priming methods dismiss any intratumor antigen-specific or suppressive mechanism to explain the low number of Marilyn T cells in Dby+ tumors observed in the absence of additional priming. However, we cannot exclude a non-antigen-specific suppression mediated by the tumor microenvironment. For instance, a nonpermissive vasculature could prevent an effective T-cell intratumor accumulation but could be overcome by the high priming capacity of MHC II+ male splenocytes.


Figure 4
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 4. No specific intratumor deletion or suppression in Dby+ tumors. A, Marilyn T cells adoptive transfer and double tumor challenge model. B, intratumor accumulation of Marilyn T cells plotted as the percentage of Marilyn T cells among total TILs (as explained in Fig. 3) at days 5 and 12.

 
Marilyn T-cell accumulation in the gut lamina propria after priming correlates with intratumor accumulation. We examined whether the lower numbers of activated Marilyn T cells observed in tumors after priming with MHC II– male cells or Dby+ tumor cells was specific to the tumors or also applied to other tissues. To do this, we measured the number of Marilyn T cells in the skin, kidney, and gut lamina propria after priming with male splenocytes or Dby+ tumor cells. We found no Marilyn T cells in the kidney or skin irrespective of the stimulation, consistent with there being no inflammation in these tissues (data not shown). After MHC II+ male splenocyte immunization, we found significant numbers of Marilyn T cells in the gut lamina propria of mice bearing a Dby– tumor (0.09% of total lymphoid cells) or no tumor at all (0.015%; Fig. 5A ), consistent with the known location of activated cells (11, 23) and the weak inflammation of the gut lamina propria (10, 32) and thereby dismissing the hypothesis that tumors would prevent the migration of activated T cells into tissues independently of any antigen specificity. Despite the high proliferation (Fig. 2C and D) and recirculation of Marilyn T cells in non-DLN (Fig. 2F and G) and mesenteric lymph nodes (data not shown), we found almost none (0.0003%) in the gut lamina propria of mice with a Dby+ tumor, whereas some Marilyn T cells (0.09%) were found in the gut lamina propria in mice immunized with MHC II– male splenocytes (Fig. 5A). These results indicate that indirect antigen presentation induced by Dby+ tumor priming results in less activated T cells accumulating in inflammatory tissues, such as tumors and the gut lamina propria.


Figure 5
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 5. Marilyn T-cell accumulation in the gut lamina propria and level of antiapoptotic effectors expression after priming correlates with intratumor accumulation. A, accumulation of Marilyn T cells assessed at day 15 in the gut lamina propria plotted as the percentage of Marilyn T cells among total lymphocytes. Data are pooled from four independent experiments. Statistical comparisons were made using the Mann-Whitney U test. B, intracellular staining for Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL was carried out on T cells from the imm-DLN or tumor DLN 5 days after priming. Mean fluorescence intensity for the antiapoptotic molecule when gating on divided (>4 divisions) Marilyn T cells. Statistical comparisons were made using the Student's t test. Representative experiment of three.

 
Level of antiapoptotic molecule expression correlates with intratumor accumulation. As we could not detect any intratumor suppressive phenomena, we wondered whether indirect antigen presentation after priming with MHC II– male splenocytes or Dby+ tumor cells may be related to a lower survival rate of the activated cells, thus resulting in their poor intratumor accumulation. Indeed, the antigenic stimulation strength influences the expression of antiapoptotic molecules, such as Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL, and survivin molecules (16, 17). It has also recently been shown that the overexpression of Bcl-2 in tumor-specific T cells used for adoptive immunotherapy leads to their improved survival (33). Therefore, we measured the intracellular expression of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL in Marilyn T cells that had undergone at least four cell divisions in the imm-DLN or tumor DLN 5 days after priming. We found that both Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL expression were higher after MHC II+ male splenocyte priming (mean fluorescence intensity, 196 ± 23 and 150 ± 7, respectively) than after MHC II– male splenocyte (154 ± 16 and 136 ± 8, respectively) or Dby+ tumor priming (116 ± 6 and 99 ± 7, respectively). The expression level of these molecules correlated with intratumor accumulation found in each group of mice (Figs. 3B and 5B) and the lower expression of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL after Dby+ tumor priming was statistically significant. These results suggest that the cells that have divided at least four times and recirculate first 5 days after priming (26) and express different levels of antiapoptotic molecules depending on the priming method. We suggest that the expression level of these antiapoptotic molecules is a function of the stimulation strength and that, as the expression level becomes higher, the cells survive better and accumulate more in the tumor.

Large amounts of peptide-MHC complexes on immunizing APCs is required for effective Marilyn T-cell intratumor accumulation. The priming caused by both the Dby+ tumor and MHC II– male splenocytes occurs through indirect antigen presentation. The ineffective intratumor accumulation of T cells after priming through indirect antigen presentation may be due to a low number of specific MHC-peptide complexes and costimulatory molecules on the host APCs. Indeed, the amount of endogenous antigen presented directly on MHC II+ male APCs may be higher than the one presented indirectly because of a dilution of the antigen. Therefore, we used a different stimulation method that kept the maturation state and number of APCs constant but varied the number of peptide-MHC complexes per APC used for the priming. We injected female LPS matured BMDCs pulsed with serial dilutions of Dby peptide (2, 40, and 800 nmol/L and 4 µmol/L) into the footpad of B6 mice bearing tumor and harboring Marilyn T cells. After 15 days, we observed no significant difference between the number of divided Marilyn T cells in each type of imm-DLN (Fig. 6A ), although we found a clear quantitative relationship (R2 = 0.81; P < 0.001) between the concentration of Dby peptide used to load the dendritic cells and the number of Marilyn T cells found inside the tumors (Fig. 6B). These results show that the number of Marilyn T cells in the tumor strongly depends on the number of peptide-MHC complexes on the priming APC. In our model, the number of Dby-MHC complexes on the host APCs in the Dby+ tumor DLN is probably not high enough to enable efficient intratumor accumulation compared with immunization with MHC II+ male splenocytes.


Figure 6
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 6. High levels of peptide-MHC complexes on immunizing APCs are required for effective Marilyn T-cell intratumor accumulation. Female LPS matured BMDCs pulsed with serial dilutions of Dby peptide (2, 40, and 800 nmol/L and 4 µmol/L) were injected into the footpad of B6 mice carrying the Dby– tumor and harboring Marilyn T cells. A, number of divided Marilyn T cells in each immunization-DLN type at day 15. B, intratumor accumulation of Marilyn T cells assessed at day 15 after priming with varying doses of Dby peptide. Representative experiment of two.

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
Here, we have analyzed the poor intratumor accumulation of specific T cells into tumors. Our experimental model allows us to distinguish intratumor mechanisms (such as deletion or suppressive) from poor priming. We have shown that CD4 T-cell migration and accumulation inside tumors depends strictly on the strength of antigenic stimulation in the lymph node draining the tumor cells or immunizing cells. Indeed, when all other variables remained constant, we found that the more specific MHC-peptide complexes that are present on the priming APC, the more the CD4 T cells accumulate inside the tumor (Fig. 6). We also showed that intratissue accumulation requires a more vigorous priming than for activation, proliferation, and recirculation to different lymphoid organs or for the ability to secrete IFN-{gamma}. Finally, for Dby+ tumors, the intensity of priming can alone explain the magnitude of intratumor accumulation, although we cannot totally rule out a possible role for a non-antigen-specific local suppression by the tumor that would be overcome by a strong priming. In cancer vaccine trials, one has to look for a very strong antigen stimulation to induce intratumor T-cell accumulation and tumor rejection. To find increased numbers of and effector capacities by tumor antigen-specific T cells in the blood or lymphoid organs may not reflect effective capacity to accumulate in the tumors.

As seen in some in vitro studies (18–20), the intensity of antigenic stimulation is a function of the peptide-MHC complex density, the number of APCs, the amount of costimulation, and the duration of stimulation. The more peptide-MHC complexes that are present on each APC, the more there is proliferation of specific T cells. In vivo, the priming strength can be estimated, with increasing specificity, from CD69 expression, proliferation of T cells in the imm-DLN, IFN-{gamma} secretion after restimulation, and recirculation in the different lymphoid organs. In vivo, naive CD8 T cells need to divide several times before expressing perforin (34). For CD4 T cells, this is less clear. One study has shown that CD4 T cells can secrete effector lymphokines without dividing (35), whereas others have shown that lymphokine secretion only occurs after several cell divisions (24, 36). In our model, only those cells that have divided at least five times are able to secrete IFN-{gamma} (data not shown; Fig. 2). One can hypothesize that migration and accumulation in inflamed tissues, such as tumors or the gut lamina propria, require a stronger stimulation, although this has not yet been shown. We have shown that when all other variables are constant (APC maturation state and APC number) the more specific peptide-MHC complexes that are present per priming APC, the more there is accumulation of the CD4 T cells inside the tumor (Fig. 6). T-cell accumulation inside tissues depends also on the ability of the T cells to survive. Our results show that the expression levels of the antiapoptotic effectors Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL were correlated to the efficiency of intratumor accumulation (Fig. 3B and 5B). The increased ability to survive may be correlated with the number of cell divisions; however, this could not be tested because CFSE staining does not allow more than six or seven cell division cycles to be quantified.

In our study, we observed similar levels of CD69 expression on Marilyn T cells in the DLN after injecting Dby+ tumor cells or MHC II+ or MHC II– male splenocytes in the footpad of mice. This showed that similar amounts of antigen reached the lymph node when the same amount of immunizing cells are injected. However, when T cells were transferred 5 days after a tumor challenge in the flank of the mice, the amount of antigen from the tumor present in the DLN was unknown. The source of antigen could be either whole protein (or cellular debris) released by the growing tumor into the intercellular space after cell death and processed by resident lymph node dendritic cells or apoptotic cells processed by the tissue dendritic cells, which would then migrate to the DLN. In both cases, the amount of and kinetics of antigen presentation is not known. This probably explains the slight differences in intratumor Marilyn T-cell accumulation after priming by MHC II– male splenocytes and Dby+ tumor cells (Fig. 3), as the tumor cells have been injected 5 days earlier and the antigen load may have been different.

From the CFSE dilution, the proliferation pattern of Marilyn T cells was similar irrespective of immunization method (Fig. 2B), with the number of dividing cells being slightly less after Dby+ tumor priming 5 days after T-cell transfer (Fig. 2C). However, we found a similar proliferation pattern and a similar IFN-{gamma} secretion capacity after 15 days and recirculation pattern for all time points (Fig. 2E-G), suggesting only a small difference in priming intensity. By contrast, the number of CD4 T cells inside the tumors (either Dby+ or Dby–) was less after Dby+ tumor priming than after male cell priming (Fig. 3). As we observed no difference in the number of Marilyn CD4 T cells in Dby+ or Dby– tumors after priming with MHC II+ male splenocytes, even when the two tumors were in the same mice (Figs. 3 and 4), we can rule out antigen-specific suppression or deletion phenomena. Therefore, it is more likely due to a lower priming intensity by the Dby+ tumor. This is supported by the slightly lower efficiency of MHC II– male splenocyte priming compared with MHC II+ male splenocyte priming because indirect presentation probably results in a reduction in the number of the peptide-MHC complexes on the host APC.

Differences in the costimulatory molecules expressed on the APCs may also explain these results. Vicari et al. have suggested that tumors could down-regulate the expression of costimulatory molecules on the dendritic cells capturing the antigen (37). However, this is unlikely in our model because when we injected CpG, CFA, or LPS into either the Dby+ tumors or the s.c. skin region drained by the same lymph node, we found no increase in intratumor accumulation (data not shown). These experiments also exclude the possibility that the presenting dendritic cells express less costimulatory molecules because they are far from the point of trauma caused by the implantation of the tumor cells or splenocytes. Finally, when mature dendritic cells loaded with the Dby peptide were used for priming, we found that the number of Marilyn T cells in the tumors was proportional to the concentration of the peptide used for loading (Fig. 6). The number of Marilyn T cells found in the gut lamina propria were similar to those found in the Dby+ or Dby– tumors for each priming method, again suggesting that no specific tumor-related mechanisms are involved.

The Dby+ fibrosarcoma we used was not ignored by the immune system because (a) its growth was slowed down by male cell immunization of the Marilyn mice, (b) the Marilyn T cells proliferated in the tumor DLN in the adoptive transfer model, and (c) the Dby+ tumors were smaller than the Dby– tumors 15 days after priming (data not shown). The tumors we used are MHC II– but their vascular network comes from the donor. Therefore, they could be targeted by rejection phenomena. This was described by Braun et al. for skin grafts that were rejected by Marilyn T cells even when they did not carry the restricting MHC haplotype (1). That the Dby+ tumor were not rejected in Marilyn mice may be due to the priming phase not being strong enough to generate enough effector cells or to there being not enough antigen in the Dby+ tumor to reactivate the effector cells in situ.

There is strong evidence that many T cells accumulate in tumors in an antigen-independent manner (6, 25, 26, 38). However, the presence of antigen in the tumor bed induces CD4+ T cells to secrete lymphokines, which in turn recruit macrophages, natural killer cells, or eosinophils that mediate tissue destruction (3, 6, 39). The decrease in Dby+ tumor growth that we observed after tumor inoculation in previously immunized Marilyn mice (Fig. 1A) suggests that there is enough antigen in situ to lead to some antitumor response. Therefore, Dby+ tumor-challenged Marilyn mice should be studied to determine the best vaccination conditions to induce tumor rejection by CD4+ T cells.

In this study, we have analyzed intratumor migration in a transplantable tumor model expressing or not a MHC II–restricted antigen. For Dby+ tumors, it is unclear whether T-cell priming occurs by the host dendritic cells capturing apoptotic bodies or cellular debris when the tumor is implanted or whether antigen is continuously captured as the tumor grows. This will affect the number of specific peptide-MHC complexes and costimulation molecules expressed per APC in the DLN. Indeed, we can suppose that the longer the interval is between tumor challenge and T-cell transfer, the fewer specific peptide-MHC complexes and costimulation molecules will be expressed per APC. This would apply to most transplanted tumor models. Therefore, these models may not best represent the situation in humans in which a tumor grows slowly without causing much tissue damage or dendritic cell activation. In the present study, we have observed an appreciable priming of the specific T cells. The Dby-I-Ab complexes are remarkably stable, having an in vivo life span of >2 weeks (40).1 Therefore, even if the T cells are injected 5 days after tumor implantation, they may still be stimulated by the antigen released when the tumor was implanted and not by the growing tumor. We are now constructing a model in which the Dby antigen expression in the tumors can be drug induced at a chosen time several days after tumor implantation. This would allow us to better assess whether antigens expressed by solid tumors are ignored or lead to suppression or to abortive immune responses followed by deletion.


   Acknowledgments
 
Grant support: Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale and Section Médicale de l'Institut Curie.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

We thank S. Laigneau, N. Froux, and I. Grandjean for managing the mouse colonies, L. Duban and I. Cruz-Moura for technical help, and M.L. Albert, P. Guermonprez, C. Théry, N. Blanchard, and A. Boissonnas for critical reading of the article.


   Footnotes
 
Note: J. Helft and A. Jacquet contributed equally to this work.

O. Lantz's team is equipe labellisée par la Ligue Contre le Cancer. N.T. Joncker is a Ph.D. student with fellowships from the Association contre le cancer and Ligue Contre le Cancer. J. Helft is a Ph.D. student with fellowship from the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale.

1 J. Helft et al., in preparation. Back

Received 9/30/05. Revised 2/28/06. Accepted 3/10/06.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Braun MY, Grandjean I, Feunou P, et al. Acute rejection in the absence of cognate recognition of allograft by T cells. J Immunol 2001;166:4879–83.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Braun MY, McCormack A, Webb G, Batchelor JR. Mediation of acute but not chronic rejection of MHC-incompatible rat kidney grafts by alloreactive CD4 T cells activated by the direct pathway of sensitization. Transplantation 1993;55:177–82.[Medline]
  3. Toes REM, Ossendorp F, Offringa R, Melief CJM. CD4 T cells and their role in antitumor immune responses. J Exp Med 1999;189:753–6.[Free Full Text]
  4. Mumberg D, Monach PA, Wanderling S, et al. CD4+ T cells eliminate MHC class II-negative cancer cells in vivo by indirect effects of IFN-{gamma}. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999;96:8633–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Qin Z, Blankenstein T. CD4+ T cell-mediated tumor rejection involves inhibition of angiogenesis that is dependent on IFN {gamma} receptor expression by nonhematopoietic cells. Immunity 2000;12:677–86.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Corthay A, Skovseth DK, Lundin KU, et al. Primary antitumor immune response mediated by CD4+ T cells. Immunity 2005;22:371–83.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Marzo AL, Lake RA, Lo D, et al. Tumor antigens are constitutively presented in the draining lymph nodes. J Immunol 1999;162:5838–45.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Nelson DJ, Mukherjee S, Bundell C, Fisher S, van Hagen D, Robinson B. Tumor progression despite efficient tumor antigen cross-presentation and effective "arming" of tumor antigen-specific CTL. J Immunol 2001;166:5557–66.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Nguyen LT, Elford AR, Murakami K, et al. Tumor growth enhances cross-presentation leading to limited T cell activation without tolerance. J Exp Med 2002;195:423–35.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Kim SK, Schluns KS, Lefrancois L. Induction and visualization of mucosal memory CD8 T cells following systemic virus infection. J Immunol 1999;163:4125–32.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Reinhardt RL, Khoruts A, Merica R, Zell T, Jenkins MK. Visualizing the generation of memory CD4 T cells in the whole body. Nature 2001;410:101–5.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Reinhardt RL, Bullard DC, Weaver CT, Jenkins MK. Preferential accumulation of antigen-specific effector CD4 T cells at an antigen injection site involves CD62E-dependent migration but not local proliferation. J Exp Med 2003;197:751–62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Campbell JJ, Butcher EC. Chemokines in tissue-specific and microenvironment-specific lymphocyte homing. Curr Opin Immunol 2000;12:336–41.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Campbell DJ, Butcher EC. Rapid acquisition of tissue-specific homing phenotypes by CD4(+) T cells activated in cutaneous or mucosal lymphoid tissues. J Exp Med 2002;195:135–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Calzascia T, Masson F, Di Berardino-Besson W, et al. Homing phenotypes of tumor-specific CD8 T cells are predetermined at the tumor site by crosspresenting APCs. Immunity 2005;22:175–84.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Rogers PR, Song J, Gramaglia I, Killeen N, Croft M. OX40 promotes Bcl-xL and Bcl-2 expression and is essential for long-term survival of CD4 T cells. Immunity 2001;15:445–55.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Song J, So T, Cheng M, Tang X, Croft M. Sustained survivin expression from OX40 costimulatory signals drives T cell clonal expansion. Immunity 2005;22:621–31.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Matis LA, Glimcher LH, Paul WE, Schwartz RH. Magnitude of response of histocompatibility-restricted T-cell clones is a function of the product of the concentrations of antigen and Ia molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1983;80:6019–23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Iezzi G, Karjalainen K, Lanzavecchia A. The duration of antigenic stimulation determines the fate of naive and effector T cells. Immunity 1998;8:89–95.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Langenkamp A, Casorati G, Garavaglia C, Dellabona P, Lanzavecchia A, Sallusto F. T cell priming by dendritic cells: thresholds for proliferation, differentiation and death and intraclonal functional diversification. Eur J Immunol 2002;32:2046–54.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Reay PA, Matsui K, Haase K, Wulfing C, Chien YH, Davis MM. Determination of the relationship between T cell responsiveness and the number of MHC-peptide complexes using specific monoclonal antibodies. J Immunol 2000;164:5626–34.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Irvine DJ, Purbhoo MA, Krogsgaard M, Davis MM. Direct observation of ligand recognition by T cells. Nature 2002;419:845–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Masopust D, Vezys V, Marzo AL, Lefrancois L. Preferential localization of effector memory cells in nonlymphoid tissue. Science 2001;291:2413–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Bird JJ, Brown DR, Mullen AC, et al. Helper T cell differentiation is controlled by the cell cycle. Immunity 1998;9:229–37.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Boissonnas A, Combadiere C, Lavergne E, et al. Antigen distribution drives programmed antitumor CD8 cell migration and determines its efficiency. J Immunol 2004;173:222–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Joncker NT, Marloie MA, Chernysheva A, et al. Antigen-independent accumulation of activated effector/memory T lymphocytes into human and murine tumors. Int J Cancer 2006;118:1205–14.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Chen Y, Demir Y, Valujskikh A, Heeger PS. The male minor transplantation antigen preferentially activates recipient CD4+ T cells through the indirect presentation pathway in vivo. J Immunol 2003;171:6510–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Lantz O, Grandjean I, Matzinger P, Di Santo JP. {gamma} Chain required for naive CD4+ T cell survival but not for antigen proliferation. Nat Immunol 2000;1:54–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Thery C, Duban L, Segura E, Veron P, Lantz O, Amigorena S. Indirect activation of naive CD4+ T cells by dendritic cell-derived exosomes. Nat Immunol 2002;3:1156–62.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Schwartz D. Méthodes statistiques à l'usage des médecins et des biologistes. Paris: Flammarion; 1963.
  31. Cuenca A, Cheng F, Wang H, et al. Extra-lymphatic solid tumor growth is not immunologically ignored and results in early induction of antigen-specific T-cell anergy: dominant role of cross-tolerance to tumor antigens. Cancer Res 2003;63:9007–15.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Kim SK, Reed DS, Olson S, et al. Generation of mucosal cytotoxic T cells against soluble protein by tissue-specific environmental and costimulatory signals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998;95:10814–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Charo J, Finkelstein SE, Grewal N, Restifo NP, Robbins PF, Rosenberg SA. Bcl-2 overexpression enhances tumor-specific T-cell survival. Cancer Res 2005;65:2001–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Opferman JT, Ober BT, Ashton-Rickardt PG. Linear differentiation of cytotoxic effectors into memory T lymphocytes. Science 1999;283:1745–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Laouar Y, Crispe IN. Functional flexibility in T cells: independent regulation of CD4+ T cell proliferation and effector function in vivo. Immunity 2000;13:291–301.[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Gudmundsdottir H, Wells AD, Turka LA. Dynamics and requirements of T cell clonal expansion in vivo at the single-cell level: effector function is linked to proliferative capacity. J Immunol 1999;162:5212–23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Vicari AP, Caux C, Trinchieri G. Tumour escape from immune surveillance through dendritic cell inactivation. Semin Cancer Biol 2002;12:33–42.[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Palmer DC, Balasubramaniam S, Hanada KI, et al. Vaccine-stimulated, adoptively transferred CD8+ T cells traffic indiscriminately and ubiquitously while mediating specific tumor destruction. J Immunol 2004;173:7209–16.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Hung K, Hayashi R, Lafond-Walker A, Lowenstein C, Pardoll D, Levitsky H. The central role of CD4+ T cells in the antitumor immune response. J Exp Med 1998;188:2357–68.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Lazarski CA, Chaves FA, Jenks SA, et al. The kinetic stability of MHC class II: peptide complexes is a key parameter that dictates immunodominance. Immunity 2005;23:29–40.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
M.-G. de Goer de Herve, A. Cariou, F. Simonetta, and Y. Taoufik
Heterospecific CD4 Help to Rescue CD8 T Cell Killers
J. Immunol., November 1, 2008; 181(9): 5974 - 5980.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BloodHome page
J. Helft, A. Jacquet, N. T. Joncker, I. Grandjean, G. Dorothee, A. Kissenpfennig, B. Malissen, P. Matzinger, and O. Lantz
Antigen-specific T-T interactions regulate CD4 T-cell expansion
Blood, August 15, 2008; 112(4): 1249 - 1258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Joncker, N. T.
Right arrow Articles by Lantz, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Joncker, N. T.
Right arrow Articles by Lantz, O.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online