Cancer Research Meeting Calendar  Telomeres
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ishida, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ueda, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ishida, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ueda, R.
[Cancer Research 66, 5716-5722, June 1, 2006]
© 2006 American Association for Cancer Research


Cell, Tumor, and Stem Cell Biology

Specific Recruitment of CC Chemokine Receptor 4–Positive Regulatory T Cells in Hodgkin Lymphoma Fosters Immune Privilege

Takashi Ishida1, Toshihiko Ishii1, Atsushi Inagaki1, Hiroki Yano1, Hirokazu Komatsu1, Shinsuke Iida1, Hiroshi Inagaki2 and Ryuzo Ueda1

Departments of 1 Internal Medicine and Molecular Science and 2 Clinical Pathology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kawasumi, Mizuho-chou, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya-shi, Aichi, Japan

Requests for reprints: Takashi Ishida, Department of Internal Medicine and Molecular Science, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-chou, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya, Aichi 467-8601, Japan. Phone: 81-52-853-8216; Fax: 81-52-852-0849; E-mail: itakashi{at}med.nagoya-cu.ac.jp.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is characterized by the presence of a small number of tumor cells in a rich background of inflammatory cells, but the contribution of the abundant nontumor cells to HL pathogenesis is poorly understood. We showed that migratory CD4+ cells induced by HL cells were hyporesponsive to T-cell receptor stimulation and suppressed the activation/proliferation of the effector CD4+ T cells in an autologous setting. We further showed that HL cells in the affected lymph nodes were surrounded by a large number of lymphocytes expressing both CC chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4) and FOXP3. These findings indicate that the migratory cells induced by HL cells function as regulatory T (Treg) cells so that these cells create a favorable environment for the tumor cells to escape from host immune system. In addition, we showed that a chimeric anti-CCR4 monoclonal antibody (mAb) could deplete CCR4+ T cells and inhibit the migration of CD4+CD25+ T cells in vitro. Recognition of the importance of CCR4+ Treg cells in the pathogenesis of HL will allow rational design of more effective treatments, such as use of an anti-CCR4 mAb, to overcome the suppressive effect of CCR4+ Treg cells on the host immune response to tumor cells. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(11): 5716-22)


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is characterized by the presence of a small number of tumor cells in a rich background of T and B cells, macrophages, and other inflammatory cells (1). The contribution of these abundant nontumor cells to the pathogenesis of HL is still poorly understood. Because a small number of HL tumor cells can survive the host anticancer immune response, it seems likely that HL cells may have developed mechanisms that inhibit development of a satisfactory immune response by the host against the tumor cells. Two significant findings may provide information about the possible underlying immunopathogenesis of HL: first, HL cells express high levels of thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC/CCL17) and macrophage-derived chemokine (MDC/CCL22; refs. 14), and an elevated serum level of TARC/CCL17 is an unfavorable prognostic factor in patients with HL (3); second, the CC chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4), the specific receptor for TARC/CCL17 and MDC/CCL22, is expressed on regulatory T (Treg) cells (57). These observations prompted us to hypothesize that HL tumor cells produce TARC/CCL17 and/or MDC/CCL22 that mediate trafficking of CCR4-positive Treg cells to the tumor, and that this specific recruitment of Treg cells represents a mechanism by which the tumor might be capable of suppressing the host antitumor response. In the present study, we examine the above hypothesis by using human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and HL cell lines in vitro, and we also carry out double immunostaining with CCR4 and FOXP3, a hallmark of naturally occurring Treg cells (811), in affected lymph node tissues obtained from patients with HL.

We have recently developed a novel chimeric monoclonal antibody (mAb), KM2760, which binds specifically to CCR4 (12, 13), and we are currently preparing for phase I and II clinical trials of administration of this antibody in patients with CCR4-positive T-cell lymphomas (14, 15). We have also reported that FOXP3 mRNA was expressed in CD4+CCR4+ T cells at a level nearly comparable to that in CD4+CD25+ T cells, and that KM2760 treatment reduced the FOXP3 mRNA expression level in parallel with the CCR4 mRNA level in PBMC obtained from healthy volunteers (12). These observations prompted us to hypothesize that KM2760 could be used as a novel strategy for treatment of patients with HL. The antibody could induce an effective antitumor immunity by reducing the concentration of CCR4-positive Treg cells in the HL tumor cell environment. In the present study, we also test in vitro the ability of KM2760 to overcome the immunosuppressive environment around HL cells by measuring the antibody effect on migratory cells induced by the supernatants of the HL cell lines.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cell lines. The HL cell lines, HDLM-2 and L-428, were kindly provided by Dr. Kunzo Orita (Director, Fujisaki Cell Center, Hayashibara Biochemical Laboratories, Inc., Okayama, Japan) and KM-H2, L-540, and L-1236 were purchased from Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen (Braunschweig, Germany). The anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) cell line carrying the nucleophosmin-anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion gene, SU-DHL-1, was kindly provided by Dr. Kunzo Orita and KARPAS-299 was purchased from Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen.

Antibodies. Mouse anti-human TARC/CCL17 mAb (clone 54026.11) and mouse anti-human MDC/CCL22 mAb (clone 57226.11) were purchased from R&D Systems, Inc. (Minneapolis, MN). FITC-conjugated mouse anti-human CCR4 mAb (FITC-KM2160) was previously described (14). Allophycocyanin-conjugated antihuman CD8 mAb (clone RPA-T8) and its allophycocyanin-conjugated isotype control mAb were purchased from eBioscience (San Diego, CA). Peridinin chlorophyll protein (PerCP)-conjugated antihuman CD4 mAb (clone SK3), phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated antihuman CD25 mAb (clone M-A251), PE-conjugated anti-CCR4 mAb (clone 1G1), and their PerCP- and PE-conjugated isotype control mAbs, and FITC-conjugated isotype control mAb for KM2160 were purchased from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA). The chimeric anti-CCR4 mAb (KM2760) was previously described (12, 13). Rituximab (16), which is an isotype-matched mAb with KM2760, was kindly provided by Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan).

Human PBMC and flow cytometry analysis. Human PBMC were isolated from healthy volunteers using Ficoll-Paque (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden). The volunteers gave informed written consent before the sampling procedure according to the Declaration of Helsinki. The PBMC were cultured in RPMI 1640 containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in a 10-cm plastic culture dish for 1 hour to allow monocytes to adhere and the nonadherent cells were recovered and used as human peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL). CD4-positive or -negative cells were isolated from human PBMC using the CD4+ T Cell Biotin-Antibody Cocktail Human (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) and Anti-Biotin MicroBeads (Miltenyi Biotec) according to the instructions of the manufacturer.

In another experiment, PBMC obtained from 15 healthy adult volunteers were incubated in RPMI 1640 supplemented with heat-inactivated 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) at 37°C, 5% CO2 for 12 hours with KM2760 at a concentration of 10 µg/mL per well in a 12-well culture plate (1.5 x 107 cells/3 mL). A control culture was incubated without KM2760 in the same manner. At the end of the culture period, the cells were washed twice in PBS and assessed by two-color flow cytometry analysis using PerCP-conjugated anti-CD4 mAb and PE-conjugated anti-CCR4 mAb (1G1) or PerCP- and PE-conjugated isotype control mAbs. Rituximab, which is an isotype-matched mAb control for KM2760, was incubated with the PBMC in the same manner as KM2760.

Chemoattractant. HDLM-2, KM-H2, L-1236, L-428, L-540, KARPAS-299, and SU-DHL-1 were suspended in RPMI 1640 containing 0.5% BSA at 3 x 105 cells/mL. The cells were cultured at 37°C, 5% CO2 for 96 hours, then each supernatant was collected and filtered through 0.22-µm pores to remove the debris and then used as chemoattractant. The RPMI 1640 containing 0.5% BSA alone was treated in the same manner and the supernatant was used as control chemoattractant. The TARC/CCL17 and MDC/CCL22 concentrations in each supernatant were determined by an ELISA using the Human TARC/CCL17 or MDC/CCL22 Immunoassay Kit (R&D Systems), respectively, according to the instructions of the manufacturer. All expressed values were averages of duplicate experiments. Recombinant human (rh)-TARC/CCL17 (R&D Systems) and/or rh-MDC/CCL22 (R&D Systems) were used as control chemoattractants.

Chemotaxis assay. Human PBL (1 x 106) suspended in 200 µL of RPMI 1640 containing 0.5% BSA were placed in the upper wells of a Chemotaxicell chemotaxis chamber with a 3-µm pore membrane (Kurabo, Osaka, Japan). The lower wells contained the chemoattractants (500 µL/well). In some experiments, anti-TARC/CCL17 mAbs and/or anti-MDC/CCL22 mAbs were added to the lower wells at final concentrations of 50 µg/mL each or KM2760 was added to the upper wells at a final concentration of 10 µg/mL. After 4 hours of incubation at 37°C, 5% CO2, cells that migrated into the lower wells were recovered and stained with PerCP-anti-CD4, allophycocyanin-anti-CD8, PE-anti-CD25, and FITC-anti-CCR4 (KM2160) and their isotype-matched mAbs. After staining, a predetermined number of standard beads (Flow-Count, Beckman coulter, Fullerton, CA) were added and the number of cells in each stained cell group was counted using FACSCalibur flow cytometer with the aid of CellQuest software (BD Biosciences) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. All expressed values were averages of triplicate experiments ± SD.

Cell proliferation and IFN-{gamma} production assay. Human CD4-positive cells (1 x 106) suspended in 200 µL of RPMI 1640 containing 0.5% BSA were placed in the upper wells of a Chemotaxicell chemotaxis chamber with a 3-µm pore membrane; the lower wells contained the chemoattractants (500 µL/well). The CD4+ cells placed in the upper wells and each migratory cell population in the lower wells were assessed for their proliferation and IFN-{gamma} production activity in response to T-cell receptor (TCR) stimulation in the presence of autologous antigen-presenting cells (APC). Autologous CD4-negative cells obtained from PBMC were irradiated (25 Gy) and used as APC. The CD4+ cells (0.75 x 104) placed in the upper wells or migratory cells (0.75 x 104) in the lower wells were cultured in the presence of 3.75 x 104 APCs and soluble anti-CD3 mAb (clone Hit3a, BD Biosciences) at a final concentration of 20 ng/mL in RPMI 1640 supplemented with heat-inactivated 10% FBS for 96 hours in a total volume of 150 µL/well (U-bottomed 96-well plate). [3H]Thymidine diluted in RPMI 1640 supplemented with heat-inactivated 10% FBS (0.5 µCi/50 µL/well) was added to each well for the last 20 hours of culture and incorporation of the [3H]thymidine (cpm) was measured as an indicator of cell proliferation using a scintillation counter (Perkin-Elmer, Wellesley, MA). All expressed values were averages of triplicate experiments ± SD. For measurement of IFN-{gamma} production, 50 µL of RPMI 1640 supplemented with heat-inactivated 10% FBS, instead of [3H]thymidine, were added to each well for the last 20 hours and the supernatants were collected. IFN-{gamma} in the supernatant was measured by a Human IFN-{gamma} ELISA Kit (BioSource International, Camarillo, CA) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. All expressed values were averages of triplicate experiments ± SD.

In addition, the CD4+ cells placed in the upper wells and each of the migratory cell populations in the lower wells were assessed for their ability to suppress the proliferation and IFN-{gamma} production activity of the CD4+ cells placed in the upper wells as an effector cell population. The CD4+ cells (0.75 x 104) placed in the upper wells or each migratory cell population (0.75 x 104) was cocultured with the CD4+ cells placed in the upper wells at a ratio of 1:1 in the presence of 3.75 x 104 APCs and soluble anti-CD3 mAb, and each of the cocultured cell populations was assessed for proliferation and IFN-{gamma} production activity in the same manner.

Double immunostaining. The double immunostaining analysis was done as previously described (17). Briefly, the formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections of lymph node tissues affected by HL were immunostained using mAbs against human CCR4 (KM2160) and human FOXP3 (236A/E7; Abcam plc, Cambridge, United Kingdom). CCR4 protein at the membrane was visualized in brown with 3,3' diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride and FOXP3 protein at the nucleus was visualized in blue with tetramethylbenzidine (True Blue, KPL, Gaithersburg, MD). The slides were counterstained with nuclear fast red and mounted.

Statistical analysis. The significance of changes in the proportion of CD4+ T cells in the absence or presence of KM2760 or Rituximab was examined using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Data were analyzed with the aid of StatView software (version 5.0, SAS Institute, Cary, NC). In this study, P < 0.05 was considered significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Production of TARC/CCL17 and MDC/CCL22 in HL and ALCL cell lines. TARC/CCL17 and MDC/CCL22 concentrations in the supernatants of the HL and anaplastic large-cell lymphoma cell line cultures are shown in Table 1 . All HL cell lines produced TARC/CCL17 and two of five cell lines produced MDC/CCL22. Neither of the ALCL cell lines produced detectable levels of TARC/CCL17 or MDC/CCL22.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Production of TARC/CCLI7 and MDC/CCL22 in HL and ALCL cell lines

 
Chemotactic activity of the supernatants of HL cell lines. Chemotactic responses of human PBL induced by the supernatants of the HL and ALCL cell lines, rh-TARC/CCL17 and rh-MDC/CCL22, were examined. Migratory cells (count/µL) collected in the lower well containing RPMI 1640 with 0.5% BSA were used as a control; their migration was set as "one." The numbers of migratory cells of each subset, collected in the lower wells containing the chemoattractants, were determined relative to that of the control cells. None of the supernatants of the HL cell lines showed any significant chemotactic activity for whole lymphocytes (Fig. 1A ) and CD8+ cells (Fig. 1B) compared with control medium. In contrast, the supernatants of the HL cell lines, HDLM-2, L-1236, and L428, showed robust chemotactic activity for CD4+ cells. The relative migratory cell counts of the HL cell lines, HDLM-2, KM-H2, L-1236, L-428, and L-540, compared with control medium (1.0 ± 0.4) were 9.9 ± 0.9, 2.4 ± 1.3, 5.8 ± 2.3, 4.7 ± 1.0, and 1.4 ± 0.6, respectively (Fig. 1C). The supernatants of the ALCL cell lines, KARPAS-299 and SU-DHL-1, did not show any chemotactic activity for CD4+ cells (Fig. 1C). Furthermore, the supernatants of the HL cell lines, HDLM-2, L-1236, and L428, showed robust chemotactic activity for CD4+CD25+CCR4+ cells. The relative migratory cell counts of HDLM-2, KM-H2, L-1236, L-428, and L-540 compared with those in control medium (1.0 ± 0.4) were 22.4 ± 2.9, 3.3 ± 1.4, 9.9 ± 4.5, 10.0 ± 2.4, and 2.0 ± 0.7, respectively (Fig. 1D). The supernatants of the ALCL cell lines, KARPAS-299 and SU-DHL-1, did not show any chemotactic activity for CD4+CD25+CCR4+ cells (Fig. 1D). Rh-TARC/CCL17 and MDC/CCL22 showed robust chemotactic activity for CD4+ and CD4+CD25+CCR4+ cells but not for whole lymphocytes and CD8+ cells (Fig. 1A-D).


Figure 1
View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Chemotactic activity of the supernatants of HL cell lines. The chemotactic responses of human PBL induced by the supernatants of HL and ALCL cell lines, rh-TARC/CCL17 and rh-MDC/CCL22. The number of cells migrated (count/µL) into the lower well containing control medium is set as "one" and the relative numbers of cells of each subset migrated into the lower well containing the chemoattractants are presented. Horizontal dotted line, base unit. The supernatants of the HL cell lines did not show any chemotactic activity for whole lymphocytes (A) and CD8+ cells (B) compared with control medium. The supernatants of the HL cell lines, especially HDLM-2, L-1236, and L428, showed robust chemotactic activity for CD4+ cells (C) and CD4+CD25+CCR4+ cells (D) compared with control medium. Columns, mean of triplicate experiments; bars, SD.

 
Flow cytometry analysis of PBL placed in the upper well and migratory cells in the lower well. A four-color flow cytometry analysis of human PBL placed in the upper wells and of migratory cells collected in the lower wells is shown in Fig. 2 . The migratory CD4+ cells induced by the HL cell lines, HDLM-2, L-1236, and L-428, consisted of a large majority of CD25+CCR4+ cells. The proportions of migratory CD4+ cells, as determined by CD25 and CCR4 expression, induced by rh-TARC/CCL17 and rh-MDC/CCL22 were almost the same as those of the three HL cell lines, HDLM-2, L-1236, and L-428. The proportion of migratory CD4+ cells induced by control medium was almost the same as that of the PBL placed in the upper well. The proportions of migratory CD4+ cells induced by the ALCL cell lines, KARPAS-299 and SU-DHL-1, were also almost the same as that of PBL in the upper well (data not shown).


Figure 2
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Flow cytometry analysis of PBL placed in the upper well and migratory cells in the lower well. Four-color flow cytometry analysis of PBL placed in the upper well and migratory cells in the lower well using PerCP-anti-CD4, allophycocyanin-anti-CD8, PE-anti-CD25, and FITC-anti-CCR4 (KM2160) and their isotype matched mAbs. Top, dot plot analyses determined by CD4 and CD8 expressions. Bottom, dot plot analyses determined by CCR4 and CD25 expressions in the CD4+ cells; the percentages of CD4+ cells in each quadrant determined by CCR4 and CD25 expressions are presented below. The migratory CD4+ cells induced by the HL cell lines, HDLM-2, L-1236, and L-428, consisted of a large majority of CD25+CCR4+ cells.

 
Treg cell function of migratory CD4+ cells induced by HL cell lines. The CD4+ cells placed in the upper wells and the migratory cells collected in the lower wells were assessed for their proliferation activity in response to TCR stimulation in the presence of autologous APC and for their ability to suppress the proliferation activity of the CD4+ cells in the upper wells (Fig. 3A ). When the CD4+ cells in the upper wells were stimulated with soluble anti-CD3 mAb in the presence of autologous APC, they responded to this TCR stimulation with a robust proliferation (the [3H]thymidine incorporation value was 3,519 ± 1,273 cpm). On the other hand, when the migratory cells in the lower well induced by the HL cell lines, HDLM-2, L-1236, and L-428, were stimulated in the same manner, they exhibited hypoproliferation responses to TCR stimulation (447 ± 49, 875 ± 63, and 771 ± 277 cpm, respectively). The migratory cells in the lower well induced by 100 ng/mL rh-TARC/CCL17 or 100 ng/mL rh-MDC/CCL22 also exhibited hypoproliferation responses to TCR stimulation (532 ± 97 and 697 ± 126 cpm, respectively; Fig. 3A, left). When the two cell populations were cocultured at a ratio of 1:1 with soluble anti-CD3 mAb in the presence of autologous APC, the migratory cells induced by the HL cell lines, HDLM-2, L-1236, and L-428, dramatically suppressed the proliferation of the CD4+ cells. When the two populations were cocultured at a ratio of 1:1 in the same manner, migratory cells induced by rh-TARC/CCL17 and rh-MDC/CCL22 also dramatically suppressed the proliferation of the CD4+ cells (Fig. 3A, right).


Figure 3
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Regulatory T-cell function of migratory CD4+ cells induced by HL cell lines. The CD4+ cells placed in the upper wells and the migratory cells in the lower wells were assessed for their proliferation and IFN-{gamma} production activity in response to TCR stimulation in the presence of autologous APC and for their ability to suppress the proliferation and IFN-{gamma} production activity of the CD4+ cells placed in the upper wells. Columns, mean of triplicate experiments; bars, SD. A, the migratory cells induced by the HL cell lines, HDLM-2, L-1236, and L-428, exhibited hypoproliferation responses to TCR stimulation (left). When the two populations were cocultured at a ratio of 1:1, migratory cells induced by HDLM-2, L-1236, and L-428 dramatically suppressed the proliferation of the CD4+ cells in the upper well (right). B, the migratory cells induced by HDLM-2, L-1236, and L-428 only produced small amounts of IFN-{gamma} in response to TCR stimulation (left). When the two cell populations were cocultured at a ratio of 1:1, migratory cells induced by HDLM-2, L-1236, and L-428 dramatically suppressed the IFN-{gamma} production of the CD4+ cells in the upper well (right).

 
The CD4+ cells in the upper wells and the migratory cells in the lower wells were also assessed for their IFN-{gamma} production activity in response to TCR stimulation in the presence of autologous APC and for their ability to suppress IFN-{gamma} production activity of the CD4+ cells (Fig. 3B). When the CD4+ cells in the upper wells were stimulated with soluble anti-CD3 mAb in the presence of autologous APC, they produced IFN-{gamma} at a concentration of 3.2 ± 1.6 pg/mL. On the other hand, when the migratory cells in the lower well induced by the HL cell lines, HDLM-2, L-1236, and L-428, were stimulated in the same manner, they only produced small amounts of IFN-{gamma} in each well (0.9 ± 0.8, 1.2 ± 0.2, and 0.8 ± 0.7 pg/mL, respectively). The migratory cells in the lower wells induced by 100 ng/mL rh-TARC/CCL17 or 100 ng/mL rh-MDC/CCL22 also produced small amounts of IFN-{gamma} in each well (1.0 ± 0.0, and 1.1 ± 0.2, respectively; Fig. 3B, left). When the two cell populations were cocultured at a ratio of 1:1 with soluble anti-CD3 mAb in the presence of autologous APC, the migratory cells induced by the HL cell lines HDLM-2, L-1236, and L-428 dramatically suppressed the IFN-{gamma} production of the CD4+ cells. When the two populations were cocultured at a ratio of 1:1 in the same manner, the migratory cells induced by rh-TARC/CCL17 or rh-MDC/CCL22 also dramatically suppressed the IFN-{gamma} production of the CD4+ cells (Fig. 3B, right).

Double immunostaining analysis for CCR4 and FOXP3 expression in affected lymph nodes obtained from patients with HL. We did double-immunostaining analysis for CCR4 and FOXP3 using affected lymph node tissues obtained from the HL patients. A representative picture from a patient with mixed cellularity HL is shown in Fig. 4 . In this case, nearly 80% of the reactive nontumor lymphocytes surrounding the HL tumor cells expressed CCR4 (visualized in brown) at the membrane and nearly 30% of the CCR4 positive reactive lymphocytes simultaneously expressed FOXP3 (visualized in blue) at the nucleus. Any lymphocyte expressing FOXP3 at the nucleus simultaneously expressed CCR4 at the membrane.


Figure 4
View larger version (105K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Double immunostaining analysis for CCR4 and FOXP3 expression in affected lymph node obtained from a patient with HL. The formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections of lymph node tissues affected by HL were double immunostained using mAbs against human CCR4 and human FOXP3. Brown, CCR4 protein at the membrane; blue, FOXP3 protein at the nucleus. The slides were counterstained with nuclear fast red and mounted. A representative picture from a patient with mixed cellularity HL. Arrows, lymphocytes that expressed both CCR4 and FOXP3; asterisks, HL tumor cells.

 
KM2760-induced effect on the proportion of CD4+ T cells in PBMC. We next examined whether KM2760 treatment would influence the proportions of CD4+ cells and CD4+CCR4+ T cells in fresh PBMC and of CD4+CCR4+ T cells in fresh CD4+ T cells obtained from 15 healthy adult volunteers (Fig. 5A-C ). A two-color flow cytometry analysis was done using PerCP-conjugated antihuman CD4 mAb and PE-conjugated antihuman CCR4 mAb (1G1) and their isotype control mAbs. Importantly, the binding of 1G1 to CCR4 was not affected by the presence of KM2760 (data not shown). A 12-hour treatment with KM2760 significantly decreased the proportion of CD4+ T cells in the PBMC (P = 0.0031; Fig. 5A). In contrast, Rituximab significantly increased the proportion of CD4+ T cells in the PBMC (P = 0.0045; Fig. 5A). A 12-hour treatment with KM2760 dramatically decreased the proportion of CD4+CCR4+ T cells in the PBMC in all 15 cases. This KM2760-induced effect was statistically significant (P = 0.0007; Fig. 5B). In contrast, Rituximab significantly increased the proportion of CD4+CCR4+ T cells in the PBMC (P = 0.0031; Fig. 5B). A 12-hour treatment with KM2760 also decreased the proportion of CD4+CCR4+ T cells in the CD4+ T cells in all 15 cases. This KM2760-induced effect was statistically significant (P = 0.0007; Fig. 5C). In contrast, Rituximab did not significantly influence the proportion of CD4+CCR4+ T cells in the CD4+ T cells (Fig. 5C).


Figure 5
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. The attribution of the chemotactic activity of the supernatant of the HL cell line to TARC/CCL17 and MDC/CCL22 and KM2760-induced inhibition of the migration of CD4+CD25+ T cells. A to C, percentages were determined of CD4+ cells in PBMC, CD4+CCR4+ cells in PBMC, and CD4+CCR4+ cells in CD4+ cells, obtained from 15 healthy adult volunteers, incubated with KM2760 or Rituximab or without any antibody. Each closed circle represents the percentage of CD4+ cells in each PBMC, CD4+CCR4+ cells in each PBMC, and CD4+CCR4+ cells in each CD4+ cell population. Points, mean; bars, SD. *, P < 0.05, significant differences between each group (n.s., not significant). A 12-hour treatment with KM2760 significantly decreased the proportions of CD4+ cells in PBMC, CD4+CCR4+ cells in PBMC, and CD4+CCR4+ cells in CD4+ cells. D, the source of the chemotactic activity in the supernatants of the HL cell lines was examined by a chemotaxis assay of human PBL using the neutralizing antibodies antihuman TARC/CCL17 and antihuman MDC/CCL22 mAbs. Antihuman TARC/CCL17 alone or antihuman MDC/CCL22 mAb alone did not completely inhibit the migration of the CD4+CD25+ T cells induced by the supernatant of one of the HL cell lines, HDLM-2, which produces both TARC/CCL17 and MDC/CCL22. In contrast, the presence of both antibodies together caused an almost complete inhibition of the CD4+CD25+ T-cell migration induced by the supernatant of HDLM-2. KM2760 partly inhibited the migration of the CD4+CD25+ T cells induced by rh-TARC/CCL17, rh-MDC/CCL22, and the supernatant of HDLM-2. Columns, mean of triplicate experiments; bars, SD.

 
The attribution of the chemotactic activity of the supernatant of the HL cell line to TARC/CCL17 and MDC/CCL22. To determine the source of the chemotactic activity in the supernatants of the HL cell lines, a chemotaxis assay was done with human PBL and the neutralizing antibodies antihuman TARC/CCL17 mAb and antihuman MDC/CCL22 mAb (Fig. 5D). The number of migratory cells in the lower wells was measured in a two-color flow cytometry analysis using PerCP-conjugated antihuman CD4 mAb and PE-conjugated antihuman CD25 mAb. The results are presented as percent migration in which the migratory cell number was set as 0% in the absence of chemoattractant and as 100% in the presence of each chemoattractant alone. The horizontal dotted line on each vertical bar graph represents the 100% level. Concentrations of 50 µg/mL of either antihuman TARC/CCL17 mAb or antihuman MDC/CCL22 mAb almost completely inhibited the migration of CD4+CD25+ T cells induced by 100 ng/mL of rh-TARC/CCL17 (–5 ± 4%) or rh-MDC/CCL22 (4 ± 7%), respectively. Concentrations of 50 µg/mL antihuman TARC/CCL17 or antihuman MDC/CCL22 mAb alone did not fully inhibit the migration of the CD4+CD25+ T cells induced by the supernatant of the HDLM-2 cell line (66 ± 2% and 63 ± 18%, respectively). When 50 µg/mL of each of the two antibodies were added together to the lower well, they almost completely inhibited the migration of the CD4+CD25+ T cells induced by the supernatant of HDLM-2 (9 ± 4%).

KM2760-induced inhibition of the migration of CD4+CD25+ T cells. The KM2760-induced inhibition of the migration of CD4+CD25+ T cells was examined via the PBL chemotaxis assay (Fig. 5D). A concentration of 10 µg/mL KM2760 in the upper well partly inhibited the migration of the CD4+CD25+ T cells induced by rh-TARC/CCL17 (41 ± 11%), rh-MDC/CCL22 (55 ± 13%), and the supernatant of HDLM-2 (46 ± 7%). Importantly, KM2760 did not block the interaction between CCR4 and TARC/CCL17 or between CCR4 and MDC/CCL22 (data not shown).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In the present study, ALCL cell lines were used as controls for HL cell lines because HL tumor cells and ALCL cells have a similar morphology and surface immunophenotype (1, 18). With regard to chemokine expression, these two types of lymphoma cells are quite different, as shown in the present study. The production of TARC/CCL17 and MDC/CCL22 in HL cells that we found in the present study is consistent with the reports by other investigators (14).

Treg cells exist in a CD4+CD25+ cell subpopulation, and FOXP3 can be specifically expressed in CD4+CD25+ Treg cells and is associated with their development and function (811). Notably, we showed here that HL cell lines attracted CD4+CD25+CCR4+ T cells, but CD8+ T cells and ALCL cell lines attracted neither CD4+CD25+CCR4+ T cells nor CD8+ T cells. In addition, most importantly, this is the first report showing that migratory cells, induced by the supernatants of HL tumor cells, are hyporesponsive to TCR stimulation and suppress the activation/proliferation of the effector T cells in an autologous setting. These findings show that the migratory cells induced by HL cells function as Treg cells so that these cells create a favorable environment for the tumor cells to escape from host immune system. Our data thus provide a strong rationale for the ineffective immune clearance of HL cells by the host immune system. We showed here that rh-TARC/CCL17 and rh-MDC/CCL22 exhibited robust chemotactic activity for CD4+CD25+CCR4+ cells and that the migratory cells induced by these two specific ligands for CCR4 also were hyporesponsive to TCR stimulation and suppressed the activation/proliferation of the effector T cells in an autologous setting. Furthermore, antihuman TARC/CCL17 or MDC/CCL22 mAb alone did not fully inhibit the migration of the CD4+CD25+ T cells induced by the supernatant of one of the HL cell lines, HDLM-2, which produced both TARC/CCL17 and MDC/CCL22, whereas both mAbs together almost completely inhibited the migration of the CD4+CD25+ T cells in response to the HDML-2 supernatant. These findings indicate that the migration of CD4+CD25+ Treg cells induced by HDLM-2 was attributable to the interaction between CCR4 expressed on Treg cells and TARC/CCL17 or MDC/CCL22. The double immunostaining analysis for CCR4 and FOXP3 in affected lymph node tissues obtained from the HL patients confirmed the in vitro observations mentioned above. That is to say, HL tumor cells were actually surrounded by a large number of lymphocytes that expressed both CCR4 and FOXP3. In contrast with the results obtained using affected lymph nodes from patients with HL, we have previously reported that in non-tumor-affected reactive lymph nodes, only a small number of interfollicular T cells were positive for CCR4 by immunostaining, and these comprised 3% to 7% of all cells in the paracortex area (14). In affected lymph nodes from patients with HL, any lymphocyte expressing FOXP3 at the nucleus simultaneously expressed CCR4 at the membrane whereas some lymphocytes expressing CCR4 did not express FOXP3. Because the CCR4 is also known to be expressed on Th2 cells (1922), these reactive CCR4+FOXP3 lymphocytes seem to be Th2 cells, which is consistent with the reports by other investigators that reactive lymphocytes in affected lymph nodes from patients with HL mainly consisted of Th2 cells (23, 24).

Clinical observations by van den Berg et al. (2) also support the present study: tumor cells from HL patients express TARC/CCL17 and reactive lymphocytes surrounding the HL tumor cells express CCR4. A situation similar to that of HL has been shown in another hematologic neoplasm, B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL). B-CLL cells produced MDC/CCL22 and attracted CCR4+ T cells (25) and patients with B-CLL showed significantly increased frequencies of CD4+CD25high Treg cells in their peripheral blood CD4+ T cells compared with the healthy individuals (26). Furthermore, Curiel et al. (6) have recently reported that ovarian cancer cells and microenvironmental macrophages produce the MDC/CCL22, which mediates trafficking of CCR4+ Treg cells to the tumor, and that this specific recruitment of CCR4+ Treg cells represents a mechanism by which tumors may gain immune privilege. In addition, Nakayama et al. (27) have recently reported that EBV-infected B cells acquire the ability to produce TARC/CCL17 and MDC/CCL22 and suggested that the production of TARC/CCL17 and MDC/CCL22, which attract CCR4+ Treg cells, may help EBV-infected B cells evade immune surveillance by the host immune system.

The recognition of the importance of Treg cells in HL pathogenesis will allow rational design of more effective treatments. For instance, experimental depletion of Treg cells in mice with tumors improved immune-mediated tumor clearance (28) and enhanced the response to immune-based therapy (29). In addition, a clinical trial of a fully human mAb that blocks CTLA-4 has already established the possibility of effecting substantial tumor destruction, although at the expense of some autoimmunity (30). In the present study, KM2760 treatment significantly reduced the proportion of CD4+CCR4+ T cells in PBMC and CD4+CCR4+ T cells in CD4+ T cells obtained from 15 healthy adult volunteers. We have previously reported that KM2760 induces a robust antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) against CCR4-positive lymphoma cells but does not induce any complement-dependent cytotoxicity or direct antiproliferation activity (12). Based on these observations, we can therefore conclude that the observed CCR4+ T-cell reduction in a PBMC culture incubated with KM2760 was induced by ADCC. In this situation, natural killer (NK) cells and monocytes in the PBMC play a role as effector cells in the ADCC. We also previously reported that the majority of CD4+CCR4+ T cells exist in a CD25+ subpopulation of PBMC from healthy volunteers (12) and we showed here in the chemotaxis assay that the migratory CD4+ cells induced by HL cells consisted of a large majority of CD25+CCR4+ cells. These observations indicate that the KM2760-induced inhibition of the migration of CD4+CD25+ T cells in the present study was due to KM2760-induced lysis of CD4+CD25+CCR4+ T cells during the 4-hour incubation. Successful treatment of HL patients with KM2760 would require depletion of the CCR4+ Treg cells not only in the periphery but also in the affected lymph nodes. KM2760 should be able to accomplish this in vivo because NK cells or macrophages, which can mediate ADCC, partly constitute the abundant infiltrating nontumor cells in the affected lymph nodes with HL (1, 31). In addition, the Fc region in KM2760 is artificially defucosylated to enhance ADCC by increasing its binding affinity to the Fc{gamma} receptor on effector cells (12, 13). Collectively, these findings suggest that KM2760 could be used as a novel strategy for treatment of HL patients and function as a novel inducer of effective anticancer immunity by depleting the CCR4+ Treg cells. On the other hand, it was necessary to be alert to possible KM2760-induced autoimmunity, as reported in the anti-CTLA-4 mAb study (30); thus, KM2760 underwent extensive evaluation in cynomolgus monkeys and did not cause any notable acute or chronic clinical toxicity.3

In conclusion, we have clarified here how the abundant nontumor cells in the environment of a small number of HL tumor cells contribute to the immunopathogenesis. The CD4+CD25+CCR4+ Treg cells migrate to the HL cells in a process mediated by the chemokines TARC/CCL17 and/or MDC/CCL22, which are produced by the HL cells and are capable of suppressing the host antitumor response. We have also shown here that KM2760 can deplete the CCR4+ T cells and inhibit the migration of CD4+CD25+ T cells induced by the HL cells. In this connection, it is also relevant to note that Rituximab, a chimeric anti-CD20 mAb, combined with the chemotherapy regimen, cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-vincristine-prednisone, has changed the standard therapy in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (16). Now, an anti-CCR4 mAb could be an ideal treatment modality for patients with CCR4+ neoplasms (14, 15, 32) and could also be used as a novel strategy for treatment of a variety of other diseases, such as HL, B-CLL, ovarian cancer, and EBV-associated disease, to overcome the suppressive effect of CCR4+ Treg cells on the host immune response to tumor or virus-infected cells. Especially in HL, therapy with an anti-CCR4 mAb combined with tumor-specific CTLs (33, 34), which are often impaired by Treg cells (35), will offer a novel treatment approach worthy of pursuit. Furthermore, combination treatment with this mAb and conventional chemotherapy, such as ABVD, seems to be very promising, as observed in the great success of Rituximab treatment (16).


    Acknowledgments
 
Grant support: Grant-in-Aids for General Scientific Research (S. Iida and R. Ueda), Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Science, Sports, and Technology (R. Ueda), and Grant-in-Aids for Cancer Research from the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare, Japan (S. Iida and R. Ueda).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

We thank Dr. Toshitada Takahashi, president of Aichi Cancer Center Hospital and Research Institute, for his critical review of the manuscript; Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Incorporation (Tokyo) for providing us with anti-CCR4 mAb (KM2160) and chimeric anti-CCR4 mAb (KM2760) and for letting us view the data from the KM2760 study in cynomolgus monkeys; Seizo Nagaya and Chiori Fukuyama for their skillful technical assistance; and Takashi Sato for helpful advice and discussions.


    Footnotes
 
Note: T. Ishida and T. Ishii contributed equally to this work.

3 Unpublished data from Kyowa Hakko Kogyo Incorporation. Back

Received 1/25/06. Revised 3/24/06. Accepted 3/30/06.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Stein H, Mann R, Delsol G, et al. Classical Hodgkin lymphoma. In: Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Stein H, Vardiman JW, editors. Pathology and genetics tumors of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. Lyon (France): IARC Press; 2001. p. 244–53.
  2. van den Berg A, Visser L, Poppema S. High expression of the CC chemokine in Reed-Sternberg cells. A possible explanation for the characteristic T-cell infiltrate in Hodgkin's lymphoma. Am J Pathol 1999;154:1685–91.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Weihrauch MR, Manzke O, Beyer M, et al. Elevated serum levels of CC thymus and activation-related chemokine (TARC) in primary Hodgkin's disease: potential for a prognostic factor. Cancer Res 2005;65:5516–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Maggio EM, van den Berg A, Visser L, et al. Common and differential chemokine expression patterns in re cells of NLP, EBV positive and negative classical Hodgkin lymphomas. Int J Cancer 2002;99:665–72.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Iellem A, Mariani M, Lang R, et al. Unique chemotactic response profile and specific expression of chemokine receptors CCR4 and CCR8 by CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. J Exp Med 2001;194:847–53.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Curiel TJ, Coukos G, Zou L, et al. Specific recruitment of reglatory T cells in overian carcinoma fosters immune privilege and predicts reduced survival. Nat Med 2004;10:942–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Lee I, Wang L, Wells AD, Dorf ME, Ozkaynak E, Hancock WW. Recruitment of Foxp3+ T regulatory cells mediating allograft tolerance depends on the CCR4 chemokine receptor. J Exp Med 2005;201:1037–44.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Hori S, Nomura T, Sakaguchi S. Control of regulatory T cell development by the transcription factor FoxP3. Science 2003;299:1057–61.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Walker MR, Kasprowicz DJ, Gersuk VH, et al. Induction of FoxP3 and acquisition of T regulatory activity by stimulated human CD4+CD25 Tcells. J Clin Invest 2003;112:1437–43.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Yagi H, Nomura T, Nakamura K, et al. Crucial role of FOXP3 in the development and function of human CD25+CD4+ regulatory T cells. Int Immunol 2004;11:1643–56.
  11. O'Garra A, Vieira P. Regulatory T cells and mechanism of immune system control. Nat Med 2004;10:801–5.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Ishida T, Iida S, Akatsuka Y, et al. The CC chemokine receptor 4 as a novel-specific molecular target for immunotherapy in adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:7529–39.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Niwa R, Shoji-Hosaka E, Sakurada M, et al. Defucosylated chimeric anti-CCR4 IgG1 with enhanced antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity shows potent therapeutic activity to T cell leukemia and lymphoma. Cancer Res 2004;64:2127–33.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Ishida T, Utsunomiya A, Iida S, et al. Clinical significance of CCR4 expression in adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL): Its close association with skin involvement and unfavorable outcome. Clin Cancer Res 2003;9:3625–34.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Ishida T, Inagaki H, Utsunomiya A, et al. CXCR3 and CCR4 expression in T-cell and NK-cell lymphomas with special reference to clinicopathologic significance for peripheral T-cell lymphoma, unspecified. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:5494–500.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Coiffier B, Lepage E, Briere J, et al. CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med 2002;346:235–42.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Tsuboi K, Iida S, Inagaki H, et al. MUM1/IRF4 expression as a frequent event in mature lymphoid malignancies. Leukemia 2000;14:449–56.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Delsol G, Ralfkiaer E, Stein H, Wright D, Jaffe ES. Anaplastic large cell lymphoma. In: Jaffe ES, Harris NL, Stein H, Vardiman JW, editors. Pathology and genetics tumors of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. Lyon (France): IARC Press; 2001. p. 230–5.
  19. Yoshie O, Imai T, Nomiyama H. Chemokines in immunity. Adv Immunol 2001;78:57–110.[Medline]
  20. Imai T, Nagira M, Takagi S, et al. Selective recruitment of CCR4-bearing Th2 cells toward antigen-presenting cells by the CC chemokine thymus and activation-regulated chemokine and machrophage-derived chemokine. Int Immunol 1999;11:81–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Bonecchi R, Bianchi G, Bordignon PP, et al. Differential expression of chemokine receptors and chemotactic responsiveness of type 1 helper cells (Th1s) and Th2s. J Exp Med 1998;187:129–34.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Sallusto F, Lenig D, Mackay CR, Lanzavecchia A. Flexible programs of chemokine receptor expression on human polarized T helper 1 and 2 lymphocytes. J Exp Med 1998;187:875–83.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Skinnider BF, Mak TW. The role of cytokines in classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 2002;99:4283–97.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Poppema S, van den Berg A. Interaction between host T cells and Reed-Sternberg cells in Hodgkin lymphomas. Semin Cancer Biol 2000;10:345–50.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Ghia P, Strola G, Granziero L, et al. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia B cells are endowed with the capacity to attract CD4+, CD40L+ T cells by producing CCL22. Eur J Immunol 2002;32:1403–13.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Beyer M, Kochanek M, Darabi K, et al. Reduced frequencies and suppressive function of CD4+CD25hi regulatory T cells in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia after therapy with fludarabine. Blood 2005;106:2018–24.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Nakayama T, Hieshima K, Nagakubo D, et al. Selective induction of Th2-attracting chemokines CCL17 and CCL22 in human B cells by latent membrane protein 1 of Epstein-Barr virus. J Virol 2004;78:1665–74.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Shimizu J, Yamazaki S, Sakaguchi S. Induction of tumor immunity by removing CD4+CD25+ T cells: a common basis between tumor immunity and autoimmunity. J Immunol 1999;163:5211–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Steitz J, Bruck J, Lenz J, Knop J, Tuting T. Depletion of CD25+CD4+ T cells and treatment with tyrosinase-related protein 2-transduced dendritic cells enhance the interferon {alpha}-induced, CD8+ T-cell-dependent immune defense of B16 melanoma. Cancer Res 2001;61:8643–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Sanderson K, Scotland R, Lee P, et al. Autoimmunity in a phase I trial of a fully human anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 monoclonal antibody with multiple melanoma peptides and Montanide ISA 51 for patients with resected stages III and IV melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:741–50.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Ortac R, Aktas S, Diniz G, Erbay A, Vergin C. Prognostic role of natural killer cells in pediatric mixed cellularity and nodular sclerosing Hodgkin's disease. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 2002;24:249–53.[Medline]
  32. Ishida T, Inagaki H, Kusumoto S, et al. CC chemokine receptor 4-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma involving the skin: a case report. Int J Hematol 2005;82:148–51.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Gottschalk S, Edwards OL, Sili U, et al. Generating CTLs against the subdominant Epstein-Barr virus LMP1 antigen for the adoptive immunotherapy of EBV-associated malignancies. Blood 2003;101:1905–12.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Bollard CM, Aguilar L, Straathof KC, et al. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte therapy for Epstein-Barr virus+ Hodgkin's disease. J Exp Med 2004;200:1623–33.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Dannull J, Su Z, Rizzieri D, et al. Enhancement of vaccine-mediated antitumor immunity in cancer patients after depletion of regulatory T cells. J Clin Invest 2005;115:3623–33.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. Ito, T. Ishida, A. Utsunomiya, F. Sato, F. Mori, H. Yano, A. Inagaki, S. Suzuki, H. Takino, M. Ri, et al.
Defucosylated Anti-CCR4 Monoclonal Antibody Exerts Potent ADCC against Primary ATLL Cells Mediated by Autologous Human Immune Cells in NOD/Shi-scid, IL-2R{gamma}null Mice In Vivo
J. Immunol., October 1, 2009; 183(7): 4782 - 4791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
A. Di Stasi, B. De Angelis, C. M. Rooney, L. Zhang, A. Mahendravada, A. E. Foster, H. E. Heslop, M. K. Brenner, G. Dotti, and B. Savoldo
T lymphocytes coexpressing CCR4 and a chimeric antigen receptor targeting CD30 have improved homing and antitumor activity in a Hodgkin tumor model
Blood, June 18, 2009; 113(25): 6392 - 6402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. Schumacher, N. Brachwitz, S. Sohr, K. Engeland, S. Langwisch, M. Dolaptchieva, T. Alexander, A. Taran, S. F. Malfertheiner, S.-D. Costa, et al.
Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Attracts Regulatory T Cells into the Fetal-Maternal Interface during Early Human Pregnancy
J. Immunol., May 1, 2009; 182(9): 5488 - 5497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
X.-J. Qin, H.-Z. Shi, J.-M. Deng, Q.-L. Liang, J. Jiang, and Z.-J. Ye
CCL22 Recruits CD4-positive CD25-positive Regulatory T Cells into Malignant Pleural Effusion
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2009; 15(7): 2231 - 2237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
A. W. Mailloux and M. R. I. Young
NK-Dependent Increases in CCL22 Secretion Selectively Recruits Regulatory T Cells to the Tumor Microenvironment
J. Immunol., March 1, 2009; 182(5): 2753 - 2765.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. Gobert, I. Treilleux, N. Bendriss-Vermare, T. Bachelot, S. Goddard-Leon, V. Arfi, C. Biota, A. C. Doffin, I. Durand, D. Olive, et al.
Regulatory T Cells Recruited through CCL22/CCR4 Are Selectively Activated in Lymphoid Infiltrates Surrounding Primary Breast Tumors and Lead to an Adverse Clinical Outcome
Cancer Res., March 1, 2009; 69(5): 2000 - 2009.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
B. Sanchez-Espiridion, A. Sanchez-Aguilera, C. Montalban, C. Martin, R. Martinez, J. Gonzalez-Carrero, C. Poderos, C. Bellas, M. F. Fresno, C. Morante, et al.
A TaqMan Low-Density Array to Predict Outcome in Advanced Hodgkin's Lymphoma Using Paraffin-Embedded Samples
Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2009; 15(4): 1367 - 1375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
B. Lamprecht, S. Kreher, I. Anagnostopoulos, K. Johrens, G. Monteleone, F. Jundt, H. Stein, M. Janz, B. Dorken, and S. Mathas
Aberrant expression of the Th2 cytokine IL-21 in Hodgkin lymphoma cells regulates STAT3 signaling and attracts Treg cells via regulation of MIP-3{alpha}
Blood, October 15, 2008; 112(8): 3339 - 3347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
P. E. M. Patten, A. G. S. Buggins, J. Richards, A. Wotherspoon, J. Salisbury, G. J. Mufti, T. J. Hamblin, and S. Devereux
CD38 expression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia is regulated by the tumor microenvironment
Blood, May 15, 2008; 111(10): 5173 - 5181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
Y. Ma, L. Visser, H. Roelofsen, M. de Vries, A. Diepstra, G. van Imhoff, T. van der Wal, M. Luinge, G. Alvarez-Llamas, H. Vos, et al.
Proteomics analysis of Hodgkin lymphoma: identification of new players involved in the cross-talk between HRS cells and infiltrating lymphocytes
Blood, February 15, 2008; 111(4): 2339 - 2346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
S. Deola, M. C. Panelli, D. Maric, S. Selleri, N. I. Dmitrieva, C. Y. Voss, H. Klein, D. Stroncek, E. Wang, and F. M. Marincola
Helper B Cells Promote Cytotoxic T Cell Survival and Proliferation Independently of Antigen Presentation through CD27/CD70 Interactions
J. Immunol., February 1, 2008; 180(3): 1362 - 1372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
J. Haas, L. Schopp, B. Storch-Hagenlocher, B. Fritzsching, C. Jacobi, L. Milkova, B. Fritz, A. Schwarz, E. Suri-Payer, M. Hensel, et al.
Specific recruitment of regulatory T cells into the CSF in lymphomatous and carcinomatous meningitis
Blood, January 15, 2008; 111(2): 761 - 766.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
H. Yano, T. Ishida, A. Inagaki, T. Ishii, J. Ding, S. Kusumoto, H. Komatsu, S. Iida, H. Inagaki, and R. Ueda
Defucosylated Anti CC Chemokine Receptor 4 Monoclonal Antibody Combined with Immunomodulatory Cytokines: A Novel Immunotherapy for Aggressive/Refractory Mycosis Fungoides and Sezary Syndrome
Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2007; 13(21): 6494 - 6500.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
Z.-Z. Yang, A. J. Novak, S. C. Ziesmer, T. E. Witzig, and S. M. Ansell
CD70+ non-Hodgkin lymphoma B cells induce Foxp3 expression and regulatory function in intratumoral CD4+CD25 T cells
Blood, October 1, 2007; 110(7): 2537 - 2544.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
T. Tanijiri, T. Shimizu, K. Uehira, T. Yokoi, H. Amuro, H. Sugimoto, Y. Torii, K. Tajima, T. Ito, R. Amakawa, et al.
Hodgkin's Reed-Sternberg cell line (KM-H2) promotes a bidirectional differentiation of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T cells and CD4+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes from CD4+ naive T cells
J. Leukoc. Biol., September 1, 2007; 82(3): 576 - 584.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
P. Juszczynski, J. Ouyang, S. Monti, S. J. Rodig, K. Takeyama, J. Abramson, W. Chen, J. L. Kutok, G. A. Rabinovich, and M. A. Shipp
The AP1-dependent secretion of galectin-1 by Reed Sternberg cells fosters immune privilege in classical Hodgkin lymphoma
PNAS, August 7, 2007; 104(32): 13134 - 13139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. H. Lee, S. G. Kang, and C. H. Kim
FoxP3+ T Cells Undergo Conventional First Switch to Lymphoid Tissue Homing Receptors in Thymus but Accelerated Second Switch to Nonlymphoid Tissue Homing Receptors in Secondary Lymphoid Tissues
J. Immunol., January 1, 2007; 178(1): 301 - 311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ishida, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ueda, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ishida, T.
Right arrow Articles by Ueda, R.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online