| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Experimental Therapeutics, Molecular Targets, and Chemical Biology |
1 Sarcoma Biology Laboratory, Sarcoma Disease Management Program, Department of Surgery and 2 Laboratory of New Drug Development, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
Requests for reprints: Gary K. Schwartz, Laboratory of New Drug Development, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021. Phone: 212-639-8324; Fax: 212-717-3320; E-mail: schwartg{at}mskcc.org.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Despite the effectiveness of imatinib mesylate in
80% of patients with metastatic GIST (12), resistance is emerging as a major clinical problem. Some 20% of GIST patients show overt disease progression within 3 months of exposure indicating primary resistance to imatinib mesylate. In addition,
50% of patients who initially respond to imatinib mesylate, relapse after 2 years (13). The mechanism for this acquired resistance is postulated to occur because of: (a) secondary mutations, (b) amplification of KIT, and (c) alternative signaling kinases driving cell growth (14). For these reasons, it has become essential to identify novel therapeutics for GIST that, although targeting the KIT receptor, work through different pathways.
One potential agent that has gained interest is flavopiridol, a semisynthetic flavone, and one of the few cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors that has been extensively studied in multiple phase I and II clinical trials (15). It primarily functions by blocking CDK activity by competitively interfering with the docking of ATP in the adenine-rich binding pockets of these and other enzymes (16). Despite having a high affinity for the CDKs, flavopiridol is not specific to only these enzymes. It has also been shown to inhibit the src family of kinases (17), as well as inhibit phosphorylation of survivin (18). In addition, by suppressing CDK9-cyclin T function (19), also known as the positive transcriptional elongation factor (P-TEFb), flavopiridol becomes a global transcriptional repressor of numerous genes (20). Studies have shown that flavopiridol as a single agent has antiproliferative activity in nonsmall cell lung, breast, prostate, glioma, and head and neck cancer cell lines (21). To date, however, it has not been studied in GIST, nor has it been shown to modulate the KIT pathway.
Considering the requirement for constitutive KIT signaling in GIST, we questioned whether flavopiridol could be an effective alternative to imatinib mesylate by inducing transcriptional suppression of the KIT receptor. We hypothesized that the cellular loss of total KIT protein would result in a reduction in active autophosphorylated KIT leading to subsequent downstream silencing and eventually apoptosis. Furthermore, the global transcriptional effect induced by flavopiridol may further enhance GIST cell apoptosis by altering the milieu of antiapoptotic signals. Using the GIST cell line, GIST882 (10), we show that flavopiridol blocks KIT promoter activity and inhibits RNA polymerase II (RNA pol II) activation, thereby reducing transcribable mRNA. This causes a time-dependent cellular depletion in mcl-1, bcl-2, X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP), and total KIT protein, with a reduction in KIT surface expression that potently induces an apoptotic response in these cells that is superior to imatinib mesylate. We show that targeting KIT and these antiapoptotic proteins at the transcriptional level could be more effective than direct receptor inhibition.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Proliferation assays. To evaluate the antiproliferative effect of drug exposure on GIST cells, DNA content was estimated using the CyQuant Cell Proliferation Kit (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) as previously described (22). In brief, cells were plated in 96-well plates at a density of 2 x 104 cells per well and allowed to adhere overnight at 37°C. After treatment, cells were incubated with CyQuant dye and lysed. This dye exhibits strong fluorescence when bound to cellular nucleic acids, and as such, the fluorescent signal is proportional to the DNA content. Plates were read using the Spectramax M2 fluorescence microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) at 480/520 nm excitation/emission.
Assessment of apoptosis. Evaluation of apoptosis was carried out using the Guava Nexin Kit (Guava Technologies, Hayward, CA). Briefly, cells were treated with varying concentrations of flavopiridol or imatinib mesylate for 12 to 48 hours in 10 cm culture plates. Both floating and adherent cells were collected and stained with Annexin V and 7-AAD. The Annexin Vpositive population was counted using the Guava PCA (Guava Technologies) and data analyzed using FloJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR). Both the early and late apoptotic cells were summed to determine total apoptosis. Caspase-3 activity was evaluated using the EnzChek caspase-3 assay kit 1 (Molecular Probes), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Fluorescence (excitation/emission,
342/441) was measured using the Spectramax reader (Molecular Devices), and was normalized to the total number of cells per condition.
Western blot. After treatment, cells were washed in cold PBS and lysed in a buffer containing 50 mmol/L HEPES-KOH (pH 7.5), 150 mmol/L NaCl, 1 mmol/L each EDTA, 2.5 mmol/L EGTA, 1 mmol/L DTT, 0.1% Tween 20, 10% glycerol, 10 mmol/L ß-glycerophosphate, 1 mmol/L NaF, 0.1 mmol/L Na3VO4, 0.2 mmol/L phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and complete mini-protease inhibitor tabs (Roche, Nutley, NJ). Cell lysates containing 10 to 40 µg of protein were resolved by SDS-PAGE, transferred onto Immuno-Blot polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and probed with antibodies including KIT (Dako Cytomation, Carpinteria, CA), phospho-KITY721, phospho-KITY703 (Zymed Laboratories, San Francisco, CA), phospho-ERKY204, total ERK 1/2, bcl-2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), mcl-1, XIAP (BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA), phospho-STAT3Y705, phospho-STAT1Y701, total STAT3 (Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA), total STAT1 (Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY), total RNA pol II and phosphorylated RNA pol II at Ser2 on the carboxyl-terminal domain (CTD; Covance Research Products, Berkeley, CA) and
-tubulin (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA). Detection was done with enhanced chemiluminescence reagents (Amersham Biosciences, England).
Quantitative real-time reverse transcription PCR. RNA isolation was done using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) from
20 million cells. Reverse transcription was done with 1.5 µg of RNA in a 100 µL reaction using random hexamer priming and TaqMan reverse transcription reagents (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) on a Thermo Hybaid thermocycler (Thermo Hybaid, Waltham, MA). All quantitative real-time reverse transcription PCR (qPCR) assays were done on the ABI Prism 7900HT Sequence Detection System and analyzed using SDS version 2.1 software (Applied Biosystems). TaqMan Gene Expression Assays (Applied Biosystems), which include gene-specific probe and primer sets were used according to the manufacturer's protocol to detect both c-KIT (Hs00174029_m1) and 18s rRNA (Hs99999901_s1). The relative expression of KIT was calculated by normalizing KIT expression to 18s rRNA.
Plasmid construction. A genomic DNA fragment of the human c-KIT promoter (23) containing 720 bp of the 5'-flanking region was prepared by PCR amplification of human genomic DNA (Clontech, Mountain View, CA). The following primers were used: 5'-CTGGTACCGTCTCCACACAAGTCCCGGC-3' (forward) and 5'-AATCAAGCTTGCTCTGGTCCACGTTCCAGCTC-3' (reverse) containing 5'-overhang restriction sites KpnI and HindIII, respectively (underlined). A standard PCR reaction was conducted for 30 cycles using a PTC-200 Peltier Thermal Cycler (MJ Research, Watertown, MA). The purified fragment was subcloned upstream of the firefly luciferase reporter gene in a pGL2-Basic vector (Promega, Madison, WI). The sequence of the resulting construct (pGL2-KIT) was verified by automated DNA sequencing.
Luciferase reporter assay. Transient transfections on HCT 116 cells were done in six-well plates using Fugene 6 transfection reagent (Roche). Plasmid DNA consisting of the promoter construct, pGL2-KIT (1 µg/well) and pRL-TK, a Renilla luciferase vector (0.05 µg/well) was then added to the diluted transfection reagent in a 3:1 reagent/DNA ratio. Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were treated with drug for an additional 24 hours, then harvested in 200 µL of 1x passive lysis buffer (Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay, Promega). Both firefly and Renilla luciferase activity was analyzed using a TD 20/20 Luminometer (Turner Designs, Sunnyvale, CA). pGL-2-KIT luciferase activity was normalized to Renilla luciferase to control for variations in transfection efficiency.
Analysis of KIT surface expression. After drug treatment, both floating and adherent cells were collected for fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis. Approximately 3 x 105 cells were stained with phycoerythrin-conjugated KIT monoclonal antibody (BD PharMingen). To control for nonspecificity, cells were similarly stained with a phycoerythrin-conjugated isotype IgG1 monoclonal antibody. Following staining, surface expression was determined using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Immunocytometry Systems, San Jose, CA) and analyzed using FloJo software.
Small interfering RNA experiments. c-KIT and control small interfering RNAs (siRNA; 800 ng/mL) were obtained from the SureSilencing human c-KIT siRNA kit (SuperArray Biosciences, Frederick, MD) and used according to the recommendations of the manufacturer. Subconfluent GIST882 cells in six-well plates were transiently transfected with the siRNAs in OptiMEM I medium (Invitrogen) using OligofectAMINE transfection reagent (Invitrogen). After 4 hours of incubation, the medium was changed to a complete culture medium. Apoptotic effects were evaluated 72 hours after transfection using Annexin V/7-AAD as described above.
Statistical analysis. Student's t test was used to determine significant differences between two means (P < 0.05).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 acid glycoprotein in human plasma, which decreases the level of unbound active imatinib mesylate by
90% (24). By testing a considerably higher dose (10 µmol/L) in RPMI which has lower acid glycoprotein levels compared with human plasma, we failed to increase cytotoxicity. Therefore, we used 1 µmol/L for all subsequent experimentations. With flavopiridol exposure, GIST proliferation relative to control cells was markedly reduced, achieving >80% inhibition by day 5 at 500 nmol/L (Fig. 1B). These viability assays reveal that both drugs are capable of suppressing GIST cell growth. However, in comparison, 300 nmol/L of flavopiridol decreased viability by 77 ± 0.8% compared with 63 ± 2.7% for 1 µmol/L imatinib mesylate at 5 days (P < 0.001). The combination of flavopiridol and imatinib mesylate was essentially equivalent to flavopiridol alone (data not shown).
|
42% and 58% Annexin V staining at 24 and 48 hours, respectively. This represents a 3.0- and 4.5-fold higher level of apoptosis induction following 300 nmol/L of flavopiridol exposure compared with 1.0 µmol/L of imatinib mesylate (P < 0.005). In addition, the induction of apoptosis did not seem to appreciably increase with imatinib mesylate concentrations up to 10 µmol/L (data not shown). The effect of flavopiridol was dependent on caspase-3 activity (25), as evidenced by the significant increase in cleavage product measured using a fluorescence-based assay (Fig. 2B). Flavopiridol treatment at 300 nmol/L resulted in a 4.4- and 3.9-fold higher level of activity at 24 and 48 hours, respectively, compared with imatinib mesylate (P < 0.001). However, there was no significant increase in caspase activity above the baseline at 12 hours with 300 nmol/L of flavopiridol, in concert with the lack of early Annexin V labeling.
|
Flavopiridol-mediated down-regulation of KIT induces apoptosis. Based on the apoptotic response observed with flavopiridol exposure, we sought to examine the molecular changes associated with this effect. The ability of flavopiridol to down-regulate antiapoptotic proteins such as XIAP, mcl-1, and bcl-2, which occurs in other systems (27), was verified in the GIST model (Fig. 3A ). As evidenced by Western blot analysis, these three antiapoptotic proteins were almost completely suppressed after 24 hours of exposure to 300 nmol/L of flavopiridol. Concomitant with this loss was PARP cleavage; the 85 kDa cleaved product of PARP is identified only in the 300 nmol/L flavopiridol-treated cells following 24 hours of exposure. Flavopiridol at 150 nmol/L and imatinib mesylate at 1.0 µmol/L did not significantly change the expression of XIAP, mcl-1, or bcl-2, and PARP cleavage did not occur, which is consistent with the lack of apoptosis observed under these drug conditions.
|
The observation that KIT down-regulation occurred in conjunction with apoptosis, whereas the early decrease in XIAP, mcl-1, and bcl-2 was not associated with an observable apoptotic response, suggested that KIT down-regulation may in itself be required for cell death. In order to separate the effect of KIT suppression from that of mcl-1, bcl-2, and XIAP in these cells, we used a focused siRNA-based approach to substantially disrupt KIT protein levels after a 72-hour transfection in GIST cells. As shown in Fig. 3C, compared with the control siRNA, KIT siRNA reduced KIT protein expression by
80%, demonstrating a high efficiency of knockdown. Staining with Annexin V (Fig. 3D) revealed substantial apoptosis in siRNA-treated cells (29 ± 2.3%) compared with the control siRNA (9.7 ± 0.53%; P < 0.01). This data supports the notion that a reduction in KIT protein, by itself, induces an apoptotic response in GIST cells. However, this still remains less than that observed with flavopiridol, suggesting that the maximal induction of apoptosis with flavopiridol reflects a collective suppression of both KIT, as well as the antiapoptotic proteins.
Suppression of total KIT by flavopiridol causes a loss in autophosphorylated active KIT. The constitutive activity of mutant KIT is identified by autophosphorylation of the receptor at the cell surface. Considering that apoptosis induction by flavopiridol occurs concomitant with KIT down-regulation, we sought to examine the changes in KIT autophosphorylation following flavopiridol treatment. Phospho-KIT at Y721 is the association site for phosphoinositide-3-kinase, which is one of the first proteins to be phosphorylated in the KIT cascade (28). Phospho-KIT at Y703 has been shown to be the binding partner for the adapter protein GRB2 which activates the ras pathway leading to cell growth (29). As shown in Fig. 4A , GIST882 cells in drug-free medium have constitutively active KIT with no change in total KIT protein over time. Flavopiridol (150 nmol/L) had no effect on inhibiting KIT autophosphorylation at either Y721 or Y703, and there were only minor reductions in total KIT protein expression observed over time. As anticipated, 1.0 µmol/L of imatinib mesylate completely abolished KIT phosphorylation at both residues within 2 hours of exposure to the drug. This is a result of direct binding of imatinib mesylate into the juxtamembrane pocket of the receptor with subsequent inhibition of kinase activity (30). There was no change in total KIT across time points. In contrast, with 300 nmol/L of flavopiridol, there was no immediate effect on the suppression of KIT autophosphorylation at 2 or 4 hours. However, after 24 hours of flavopiridol exposure, phospho-KIT Y721 was almost completely abolished and Y703 was drastically reduced. Thus, the concomitant decrease in total KIT protein levels observed at 24 to 48 hours depletes the pool of available receptor to undergo autophosphorylation.
|
75% compared with the untreated cells as well as the other drug conditions. Abrogation of KIT autophosphorylation by flavopiridol reduces activation of downstream signals. The ability of flavopiridol to suppress GIST cell growth in a KIT-dependent manner would require a reduction in the activity of downstream signaling molecules including Ras/Erk, phosphoinositide-3-kinase, mitogen-activated protein kinase, and STAT pathways (31, 32). We therefore evaluated the expression and activity of several of these signaling proteins over a time course by probing for the phosphorylated active forms by Western blotting (Fig. 5A ). We compared the differences in expression after treatment with 300 nmol/L of flavopiridol and 1.0 µmol/L of imatinib mesylate. The data reveals that phosphorylated active STAT1 (p-STAT1 Y701), STAT3 (p-STAT3 Y705), and ERK (p-ERK Y204) were all reduced in both treatment groups. However, with imatinib mesylate treatment, there was an earlier loss of these activated forms which parallels the early abolishment of KIT autophosphorylation (Fig. 4A). All activated proteins were significantly reduced as early as 4 hours after imatinib mesylate exposure and were undetectable by 24 hours. With flavopiridol treatment, the decrease occurred later. To confirm that the down-regulation of these downstream mediators was not related to generalized inhibition by flavopiridol, we evaluated the amount of total protein. As shown in Fig. 5B, total protein for ERK1/2, STAT1, and STAT3 went unchanged in the flavopiridol and imatinib mesylate treatment groups relative to untreated cells at 24 hours. This suggests that the loss of the phosphorylated active downstream mediators was likely related to reduced constitutive KIT signaling.
|
10 to 12 hours, especially in cells with high levels of KIT protein (33).
|
We further examined this transcriptional effect of flavopiridol on KIT by assessing promoter activity. We used HCT116 colon cancer cells because of an inability to adequately transfect the reporter vector into the nucleus of the GIST cell line despite optimization of the transfection conditions. Treatment of vector-transfected cells for 24 hours produced significant reductions in KIT promoter activity with 300 nmol/L of flavopiridol (Fig. 6C). There was an 11.5-fold decrease in luciferase activity at 300 nmol/L compared with untreated cells (P < 0.02) after normalization to the Renilla vector. The promoter effect also seemed to be dependent on a threshold concentration of 300 nmol/L because half the dose resulted in only a modest decrease in promoter activity, 1.5-fold lower than the untreated cells (P = 0.10). Imatinib mesylate, which binds directly to the KIT receptor, did not have an appreciable effect on the promoter activity in these cells. These results support the observation that the suppression of KIT expression by flavopiridol occurs at the transcriptional level, likely through P-TEFb.
Finally, considering that this is the first time flavopiridol has been shown to transcriptionally suppress KIT, we wanted to confirm our findings with another established inhibitor of P-TEFb. The compound DRB is a nucleoside analogue that also potently inhibits P-TEFb, thus, inhibiting CTD phosphorylation (35). As shown in Fig. 6D, following exposure of GIST cells to 50 µmol/L of DRB for up to 24 hours, both KIT autophosphorylation sites at Y703 and Y721 were almost completely suppressed. Total KIT protein expression was significantly down-regulated to a similar level as that observed with flavopiridol after 24 hours. In addition, examination of mcl-1 and bcl-2 showed an early reduction by at least 4 hours that preceded KIT suppression. Annexin V labeling (Fig. 6E) revealed that DRB exposure for 24 hours was required for significant apoptosis induction compared with control (30 ± 1.6% versus 8 ± 0.72%; P < 0.01). Again, earlier sampling did not show measurable apoptosis (data not shown). Thus, with DRB, in transcriptionally down-regulated KIT, we observed an apoptotic response in these cells that approximates the effect mediated by flavopiridol.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
30% apoptosis, 48 hours of exposure to flavopiridol resulted in almost 60% apoptosis. This increased induction is likely related to the shift in the antiapoptotic milieu to include mcl-1, bcl-2, and XIAP, but still requires KIT suppression. Other factors may also contribute to lethality, including the inhibition of other CDK's, as well as nuclear factor
B inhibition (36). The role these other factors play remains the subject of future investigations. The concept of using transcriptional suppression to block receptor tyrosine kinase signaling has been explored in other studies. Nahta and colleagues showed that the transcriptional suppression of epidermal growth factor receptor by flavopiridol, independent of its effect on the cell cycle, caused apoptotic synergy with trastuzumab in breast cancer cells (37). They confirmed their findings by substituting flavopiridol with DRB, a known transcriptional suppressor and P-TEFb inhibitor. We similarly treated our cells with DRB and recapitulated the same time-dependent reduction in KIT autophosphorylation and overall KIT expression observed with flavopiridol, whereas inducing an apoptotic response. Our data, showing inhibition of RNA pol II phosphorylation by flavopiridol, coupled with the results after DRB exposure, indicate for the first time that KIT expression is regulated, at least in part, by P-TEFb. As P-TEFb has the capacity to be recruited to gene promoters to enhance transcription, the observed reduction in luciferase activity with flavopiridol exposure also implicates P-TEFb in c-KIT promoter control (38, 39).
An interesting finding of this study was that imatinib mesylate at 1.0 µmol/L, despite completely inhibiting KIT activation at both Y703 and Y721, produced minimal apoptosis over a 48-hour period. The antiproliferative effects of imatinib mesylate were mediated more by a G1 cell cycle arrest (data not shown). We are not the first to show that imatinib mesylate fails to induce apoptosis despite blocking the KIT receptor. In neuroblastoma cells, Beppu et al. has shown that imatinib mesylate concentrations of 0.5 to 1.0 µmol/L were capable of inhibiting KIT autophosphorylation but could not induce apoptosis after 48 hours (40). Other investigators have shown that imatinib mesylate can induce apoptosis in GIST cells, but only with protracted drug exposure of 4 to 7 days, despite showing a reduction in KIT phosphorylation as early as 90 minutes after imatinib mesylate treatment (10). In addition, clinically, a paucity of apoptosis has also been observed with imatinib mesylate therapy, and to date, there have been only rare complete responses in GIST patients. Collectively, this data would indicate that GIST882 cells are not completely dependent on KIT signaling for cell survival. Although we show that targeted disruption of KIT with siRNA results in cell death, the enhanced induction of apoptosis by flavopiridol indicates a co-dependency on antiapoptotic proteins including XIAP, mcl-1, and bcl-2. In addition, by transcriptionally silencing KIT expression with either siRNA or flavopiridol, we seem to induce a more complete interruption of this signaling cascade, leading to cell death that is not achievable with direct receptor inhibition by imatinib mesylate alone.
In evaluating the dose dependency of flavopiridol activity, 150 nmol/L was relatively ineffective in the GIST882 cells, having minimal antiproliferative and apoptotic effects, and failing to induce significant reductions in KIT mRNA or protein. Other cancer cell lines have been shown to be inhibited at these lower concentrations of flavopiridol, mostly through CDK modulation. The threshold dependency of 300 nmol/L in these cells, however, confirms the likelihood that transcriptional suppression of KIT is required for activity. Lam et al. did a microarray analysis on flavopiridol-treated lymphoma cells and found that gene expression profiles were unaffected by concentrations <300 nmol/L (41). In relating the gene expression changes to drug activity, the authors similarly found no viability changes in their cell lines at concentrations <250 nmol/L. This suggests that higher concentrations of flavopiridol are required to produce the transcriptional suppression that we observed.
The emergence of imatinib mesylate resistance in both GIST as well as CML patient populations has prompted the search for other molecularly targeted therapeutics. SU11248, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with KIT-inhibitory properties has had some success in patients with imatinib mesylaterefractory GIST, and is currently undergoing clinical trials (42). There are other tyrosine kinase inhibitors that have also been evaluated preclinically and shown to inhibit KIT kinase activity including PKC412 (43) and PP1 (44); however, the direct receptor binding properties of many of these tyrosine kinase inhibitors, including imatinib mesylate, likely contributes to the mutational capacity of the gene. Structural studies have proven that imatinib mesylate binds in the juxtamembrane region and other mutations in the gene, specifically in the kinase region, render imatinib mesylate ineffective (30). Other human malignancies such as human mastocytosis are characterized by KIT kinase domain mutations (codon 816) that are unequivocally resistant to inhibition by imatinib mesylate (45). The capacity of flavopiridol to transcriptionally down-regulate the KIT gene and induce apoptosis suggests that a mutation, unless located in the promoter region, would not be a factor in the activity of this drug.
Clinically, peak flavopiridol levels of 3.0 µmol/L have been reported (46). With 90% protein binding, this would indicate that peak plasma levels of 300 nmol/L could be achieved. With 3.0 µmol/L of flavopiridol, in the presence of human plasma proteins, we show that flavopiridol can still induce significant degrees of apoptosis in the GIST cells. In addition, recent pharmacologic models have indicated that these levels can be maintained for several hours if the drug is first administered as an i.v. bolus followed by a 4-hour infusion. This approach has been clinically applied to the treatment of chemotherapy-refractory CLL resulting in dramatic clinical responses in the setting of tumor lysis syndrome (47). Longer durations of exposure beyond 4 hours are under clinical investigation. Thus, flavopiridol could represent a new direction for the treatment of imatinib mesylaterefractory GIST. Rather than targeting mutated sites on the KIT receptor, flavopiridol can induce a selective suppression of KIT expression by inhibiting transcription at the KIT promoter through P-TEFb. This, in essence, would encompass all forms of imatinib mesylate resistance. Although imatinib mesylate should continue to be used as a first line agent in the treatment of GIST, our improved understanding of flavopiridol pharmacology and transcriptional suppression has solidified a new niche for this drug. We envision flavopiridol as a strategic alternative to the current receptor-targeted approaches in the treatment of imatinib mesylaterefractory GIST tumors and perhaps other KIT-dependent malignancies.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
We thank the laboratory of Dr. Bhuvanesh Singh for technical support, Maureen Thyne and Dr. Jonanthan Fletcher for assistance with the GIST cell line, Dr. Annette Duensing for helpful discussion, and Dr. Murray Brennan for his guidance and support of the MSKCC surgical research fellowship.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received 8/17/05. Revised 3/15/06. Accepted 3/23/06.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 acid glycoprotein binds to imatinib (STI571) and substantially alters its pharmacokinetics in chronic myeloid leukemia patients. Clin Cancer Res 2003;9:62532.
B activation induced by various carcinogens and inflammatory agents through inhibition of I
B
kinase and p65 phosphorylation: abrogation of cyclin D1, cyclooxygenase-2, and matrix metalloprotease-9. J Biol Chem 2004;279:47509.
]B binds P-TEFb to stimulate transcriptional elongation by RNA polymerase II. Mol Cell 2001;8:32737.[CrossRef][Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Bonvini, E. Zorzi, L. Mussolin, G. Monaco, M. Pigazzi, G. Basso, and A. Rosolen The effect of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor flavopiridol on anaplastic large cell lymphoma cells and relationship with NPM-ALK kinase expression and activity Haematologica, July 1, 2009; 94(7): 944 - 955. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Heinrich, S. George, S. Bauer, and J. A. Fletcher Optimizing the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: The Roles of Tumor Genotyping, Imatinib Blood-level Testing, and New Therapeutic Strategies ASCO Educational Book, January 1, 2009; 2009(1): 694 - 699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Spunt, S. X. Skapek, and C. M. Coffin Pediatric Nonrhabdomyosarcoma Soft Tissue Sarcomas Oncologist, June 1, 2008; 13(6): 668 - 678. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Ambrosini, S. L. Seelman, L.-X. Qin, and G. K. Schwartz The Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor Flavopiridol Potentiates the Effects of Topoisomerase I Poisons by Suppressing Rad51 Expression in a p53-Dependent Manner Cancer Res., April 1, 2008; 68(7): 2312 - 2320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.N. Fornier, D. Rathkopf, M. Shah, S. Patil, E. O'Reilly, A.N. Tse, C. Hudis, R. Lefkowitz, D.P. Kelsen, and G.K. Schwartz Phase I Dose-Finding Study of Weekly Docetaxel Followed by Flavopiridol for Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2007; 13(19): 5841 - 5846. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Guo, N. P. Agaram, G. C. Wong, G. Hom, D. D'Adamo, R. G. Maki, G. K. Schwartz, D. Veach, B. D. Clarkson, S. Singer, et al. Sorafenib Inhibits the Imatinib-Resistant KITT670I Gatekeeper Mutation in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Clin. Cancer Res., August 15, 2007; 13(16): 4874 - 4881. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Liu, M. Tseng, S. A. Perdreau, F. Rossi, C. Antonescu, P. Besmer, J. A. Fletcher, S. Duensing, and A. Duensing Histone H2AX Is a Mediator of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Cell Apoptosis following Treatment with Imatinib Mesylate Cancer Res., March 15, 2007; 67(6): 2685 - 2692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |