| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Cell, Tumor, and Stem Cell Biology |
Departments of 1 Cell and Developmental Biology, 2 Medicine, 3 Pediatrics and Pharmacology, and 4 Cancer Biology, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee and 5 Program in Colorectal Cancer, Center for Molecular Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut
Requests for reprints: Raymond N. DuBois, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 698 Preston Research Building, 2300 Pierce Avenue, Nashville, TN 37232. Phone: 615-343-0527; Fax: 615-936-2697; E-mail: raymond.dubois{at}vanderbilt.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Prostaglandins, including PGE2, derive from prostaglandin endoperoxide H2 synthase-1 and -2 [cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) and COX-2] enzymes and regulate many biological functions, including hemostasis, salt balance, female reproduction, and immune responses (9). COX-2 production of PGE2, the most abundant prostaglandin in gastrointestinal tumors, can promote carcinogenesis by modulating apoptosis, proliferation, and angiogenesis (10, 11). Recent studies suggest that administration of PGE2 accelerates tumor progression (12), and that PGE2 may stabilize ß-catenin through axin regulation (13). Although NSAIDs confer a protective effect by blocking PGE2 synthesis, the endogenous mechanism for inactivating PGE2 through catabolism by prostaglandin dehydrogenase (PGDH) remains poorly understood.
Previously, we observed down-regulation of PGDH in a subset of colorectal carcinomas and found preliminary evidence suggesting that epidermal growth factor (EGF) regulates PGDH expression (14). In the present study, we examine the mechanism of PGDH repression by EGF and conduct meta-analysis of PGDH expression in multiple cancers, including colon, breast, liver, lung, and prostate. Our data suggest that EGF represses PGDH expression. Specifically, EGF can induce Snail to bind the PGDH promoter and repress transcription. We show that disruption of EGFR signaling induces PGDH expression and activity in vivo. Finally, analysis of clinical data sets supports the hypothesis that PGDH is repressed in multiple cancers, and that elevated Snail expression correlates with down-regulation of PGDH in colon cancers.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Quantitative real-time PCR. PCR reaction contained iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), 50 ng of each primer, and 5 µl of 1:1,000 diluted reverse transcriptase template in a 25-µL reaction volume. Amplification specificity was confirmed by melt-curve analysis, and expression values were normalized to ß-actin. See Table 1 for oligonucleotide sequences.
|
Immunoblotting. Cells were washed with PBS and lysed with radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer. Proteins were separated on precast SDS-PAGE gels and electrotransferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. Antibodies: PGDH (200-179; 1:2,000) from Novus Biologicals; E-cadherin (H-108; 1:1,000) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA); ß-actin (A-5441; 1:2,500) from Sigma.
Transient transfection and reporter gene analysis. Transfection of a 2.4-kb PGDH promoter luciferase construct was carried out with LipofectAMINE (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) using 100 ng of reporter plasmid and 5 ng of pRL-SV40. Firefly and Renilla luciferase activities were measured and normalized with a dual luciferase assay (Promega, Madison, WI).
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay was done as previously described (17). See Table 1 for oligonucleotide sequences.
Laser capture microdissection, tissue collection, and in situ hybridization. With Vanderbilt University Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, human colorectal tumor and matching normal mucosa specimens were obtained from surgical resections. With University of Connecticut IRB approval, hyperplastic crypts were microdissected from fresh-frozen tissue sections following isolation of human aberrant crypt foci (ACF) and matching normal mucosa with an Olympus close-focus magnifying endoscope. 35S-labeled PGDH riboprobes were used for in situ hybridization as previously described (18).
Immunohistochemistry. Paraffin sections of adult ApcMin intestine were dewaxed, rehydrated, and incubated overnight at 4°C with previously published antibodies against E-cadherin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology H-108; 1:100) and Snail (Santa Cruz Biotechnology E-18; 1:100). Negative controls received no primary antibody. The Vectastain ABC peroxidase system (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) was used for immunodetection.
In vivo PGDH functional assay. C57Bl/6 and C576Bl/6-ApcMin mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). Analysis of PGE2 urinary metabolites (PGE-M) following catabolism by PGDH was done by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) of urine collected overnight following daily gavage of erlotinib (50 mg/kg) or vehicle for 1 week. All mice were housed and used in accordance with the NIH and institutional guidelines on the care and use of laboratory animals.
LC-MS/MS. The major urinary metabolite of PGE2, 11
-hydroxy-9,15-dioxo-2,3,4,5-tetranor-prostane-1,20-dioic acid (PGE-M), was measured in urine; 400 µL of urine was derivatized using methoximine HCl (16% w/v) in 1.5 mol/L sodium acetate solution. Samples were purified by extraction using a C18 SepPak, after which 12.4 ng of [2H6]O-methyloxime PGE-M internal standard was added. Samples were dried under nitrogen, resuspended in 50 µL mobile phase A [95:4.9:0.1 (v/v/v) 5 mmol/L ammonium acetate/acetonitrile/acetic acid], and analyzed by LC-MS/MS.
Subcutaneous tumorigenicity assays and gas chromatography/MS. Following xenograft establishment, nude mice (n = 4) were gavaged daily with erlotinib (50 mg/kg) or vehicle for 1 week. Gene expression was analyzed by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR following isolation of RNA. Upon lipid extraction, PGE2 levels were assayed by gas chromatography-MS as previously described (19).
Microarray data analysis. Publicly available gene expression data from 117 patients on 24,481 genes (20) was downloaded and analyzed as follows. Estrogen receptor (ER) status was determined by immunohistochemistry-validated microarray analysis, and the association between ER status and relapse-free survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator on published outcome data. Pearson correlation coefficients were computed between ER (NM_00012) and PGDH (NM_000860), Snail (NM_00598), COX-2 (NM_000963), and E-cadherin (NM_00436). In addition, meta-analysis of gene expression in human tumor samples was conducted with Oncomine 2.0 (http://www.oncomine.org) on multiple data sets. These data are composed of two general types: two channel ratio data and single channel intensity data. All available data were included in processing and analysis, except for negative single channel intensity values. All data sets were log transformed and median centered per array.
Statistical analyses. Statistical significance was determined as P < 0.05 by Student's t test. Spearman's correlation coefficient was computed between Snail and PGDH expression in colorectal carcinoma samples. In vitro experiments were replicated in multiple cell lines, and data are expressed as mean ± SE.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We observe that EGF represses PGDH protein by 24 hours and up to 72 hours following treatment (Fig. 1A ). A similar reduction was observed with E-cadherin expression (Fig. 1A). EGF stimulation reduces PGDH transcript levels in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1B). As EGF causes a similar decrease in steady-state protein and RNA levels, we examined transcriptional activation and stability to determine the specific level of regulation. PGDH promoter activity is decreased by EGF treatment and induced by erlotinib (Tarceva), a small-molecule kinase inhibitor specific for EGFR (Fig. 1C). However, pretreatment with erlotinib blocks EGF repression of PGDH-luciferase activity (Fig. 1C). In contrast, PGDH transcript stability following actinomycin D treatment is not altered by stimulation or inhibition of EGFR activity (Fig. 1D). These data suggest that EGF signaling represses transcription of PGDH.
|
|
We next employed RNA interference to complement gain-of-function studies of Snail-dependent repression of PGDH. Using HT-29 cells, which express elevated levels of Snail relative to HCT-15 cells, we reasoned that knock down of Snail would induce PGDH transcription. Introduction of short hairpin RNA targeted to Snail disrupts EGF repression of PGDH transcription (Fig. 2E). In gel shift experiments, Snail specifically binds conserved E-box elements in the PGDH promoter (Fig. 2F). Shifts were observed with E-boxes 1 and 3 and could be competed away with 50-fold excess of unlabeled oligonucleotide (Fig. 2F). Taken together, we find that Snail can mediate EGF-dependent repression of PGDH transcription.
Modulation of EGFR regulates PGDH expression and activity in vivo. ApcMin mice harbor a nonsense APC mutation and spontaneously develop preinvasive adenomas that recapitulate many aspects of the human syndrome, familial adenomatous polyposis coli. Previous reports suggest that EGFR activity is elevated in ApcMin adenoma tissue (22), and introduction of hypomorphic Egfr reduces ApcMin tumor burden by 10-fold (22, 23). Moreover, progression of these tumors requires PGE2 (24, 25). To examine EGF regulation of Pgdh in vivo, we evaluated expression patterns of Snail, E-cadherin, and Pgdh in ApcMin mouse intestine. In normal mucosa, Snail localizes to the proliferative crypt compartment, whereas Pgdh and E-cadherin are restricted to well-differentiated villi (Fig. 3A and B ). Interestingly, examination of adenomas revealed high expression of Snail, whereas Pgdh is almost completely absent (Fig. 3A and B).
|
To further examine PGDH repression by EGF in vivo, we assessed whole-body prostaglandin catabolism following disruption of EGFR signaling in ApcMin mice. We used LC-MS/MS to assay PGDH catabolic products in urine and hypothesized that EGFR blockade would induce PGDH activity. Accordingly, PGE-M levels increased 6-fold in ApcMin urine following daily gavage with erlotinib (50 mg/kg) for 1 week (Fig. 3E). These data suggest that EGFR can regulate PGDH expression and activity in vivo.
PGDH expression is repressed in multiple human cancers. Published reports suggest down-regulation of PGDH in a subset of colorectal carcinomas (14, 26). To more thoroughly evaluate the role of PGDH in human tumorigenesis, we conducted meta-analysis to test our hypothesis that PGDH is repressed in multiple cancer data sets generated by outside investigators. Examination of microarray expression data from eight published reports indicates that PGDH expression is reduced in multiple human cancers relative to matched normal mucosa (n = 1,114; Fig. 4A ; data not shown). Moreover, PGDH is further diminished upon cancer progression (Fig. 4A). Specifically, PGDH decreases from normal tissue (n = 222) to primary tumors (n = 571; P = 0.0098) and is further reduced from well-differentiated (n = 99) to poorly differentiated (n = 34) primary tumors (P = 0.0221). Finally, PGDH expression is further reduced from primary tumors (n = 107) to metastatic tumors (n = 29; P = 0.0177; Fig. 4A; data not shown).
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We originally identified COX-2 as an EGF/TGF-
target gene in intestinal epithelial cells, with robust enhancement of prostaglandin production following EGFR activation (27). Other reports from our group indicate COX-2derived PGE2 can transactivate the EGFR (28). We now show that EGFR can repress PGDH, allowing PGE2 to accumulate and activate the pathway repeatedly in a feed-forward cycle.
These findings raise some intriguing questions. What cofactors are necessary for Snail-dependent repression of PGDH? Palmer et al. report a similar mechanism for repression of vitamin D receptor, another gene with tumor-suppressor activity in the colon (29). Does EGF signaling mediate repression in early ACF? Is this linked to repression of PGDH observed in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (30) who are predisposed to develop cancer?
These data also corroborate emerging evidence from gene expression profiles indicating that clinical outcome, including risk of metastasis, is specified relatively early in the transformation process (31). Early identification of high-risk lesions may allow more aggressive monitoring and treatment of specific patients.
By integrating prostaglandins with growth factor signaling, the current findings present important clinical implications. Expression of EGFR is known to be associated with poor survival in patients with colorectal cancer (32), and previous studies indicate poorer prognosis for carcinomas bearing increased COX-2dependent production of prostaglandins (33, 34). Moreover, simultaneous blockade of prostaglandin and EGFR signaling ablates tumor formation in ApcMin mice (35).
Although EGF and PGE2 have been targeted individually in human patients, dose-limiting toxicity and selection for resistant clones indicate that administration of these agents in combination may achieve improved clinical outcomes. Moreover, understanding the mechanistic basis of PGDH repression could lead to improved approaches to chemoprevention of cancer. Because PGDH does not degrade anti-thrombotic PGI2, these data raise the possibility of selectively targeting PGE2 through PGDH and avoiding some of the cardiovascular side effects attendant with COX-2 inhibition. Thus, EGFR inhibitors may serve a role in cancer treatment or prevention by restoring PGDH expression. Measurement of PGE2 urinary metabolites provides a possible noninvasive and cost-effective method of monitoring therapeutic response (36).
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
We thank Birgit Gellersen (Institute for Hormone and Fertility Research, University of Hamburg) for pLuc-PGDH; Zhimin Lu (University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center) for pRS-Snail; Antonio García de Herreros (Universitat Pompeu Fabra) for pGL3-E-cad (178/+92), pcDNA3-Snail, and pcDNA3-
zf-Snail; Jason Morrow (Vanderbilt University) for PGE-M and PGE2 analysis; Sharada Katkuri for assistance with mouse tissue acquisition; and members of the DuBois laboratory for experimental advice and stimulating discussions.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received 5/16/06. Accepted 5/16/06.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Greenhough, H. J.M. Smartt, A. E. Moore, H. R. Roberts, A. C. Williams, C. Paraskeva, and A. Kaidi The COX-2/PGE2 pathway: key roles in the hallmarks of cancer and adaptation to the tumour microenvironment Carcinogenesis, March 1, 2009; 30(3): 377 - 386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. W. Rosenberg, C. Giardina, and T. Tanaka Mouse models for the study of colon carcinogenesis Carcinogenesis, February 1, 2009; 30(2): 183 - 196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Backlund, J. R. Mann, V. R. Holla, Q. Shi, T. Daikoku, S. K. Dey, and R. N. DuBois Repression of 15-Hydroxyprostaglandin Dehydrogenase Involves Histone Deacetylase 2 and Snail in Colorectal Cancer Cancer Res., November 15, 2008; 68(22): 9331 - 9337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Wakimoto, I. Wolf, D. Yin, J. O'Kelly, T. Akagi, L. Abramovitz, K. L. Black, H.-H. Tai, and H. P. Koeffler Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Suppress Glioma via 15-Hydroxyprostaglandin Dehydrogenase Cancer Res., September 1, 2008; 68(17): 6978 - 6986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Hughes, T. Otani, P. Yang, R. A. Newman, R. K. Yantiss, N. K. Altorki, J. L. Port, M. Yan, S. D. Markowitz, M. Mazumdar, et al. NAD+-Dependent 15-Hydroxyprostaglandin Dehydrogenase Regulates Levels of Bioactive Lipids in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cancer Prevention Research, September 1, 2008; 1(4): 241 - 249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. Wali, D. P. Kunte, J. L. Koetsier, M. Bissonnette, and H. K. Roy Polyethylene glycol-mediated colorectal cancer chemoprevention: roles of epidermal growth factor receptor and Snail Mol. Cancer Ther., September 1, 2008; 7(9): 3103 - 3111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. R. Holla, M. G. Backlund, P. Yang, R. A. Newman, and R. N. DuBois Regulation of Prostaglandin Transporters in Colorectal Neoplasia Cancer Prevention Research, July 1, 2008; 1(2): 93 - 99. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Markowitz Colorectal Neoplasia Goes with the Flow: Prostaglandin Transport and Termination Cancer Prevention Research, July 1, 2008; 1(2): 77 - 79. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Liu, X. Wang, Y. Lu, S. Han, F. Zhang, H. Zhai, T. Lei, J. Liang, J. Wang, K. Wu, et al. Expression of 15-PGDH is downregulated by COX-2 in gastric cancer Carcinogenesis, June 1, 2008; 29(6): 1219 - 1227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Dhawan, A. B. Jeffreys, R. Zheng, J. C. Stewart, and D. W. Knapp Cyclooxygenase-2 dependent and independent antitumor effects induced by celecoxib in urinary bladder cancer cells Mol. Cancer Ther., April 1, 2008; 7(4): 897 - 904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. W. Visscher, V. S. Pankratz, M. Santisteban, C. Reynolds, A. Ristimaki, R. A. Vierkant, W. L. Lingle, M. H. Frost, and L. C. Hartmann Association Between Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression in Atypical Hyperplasia and Risk of Breast Cancer J Natl Cancer Inst, March 19, 2008; 100(6): 421 - 427. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Backlund, J. M. Amann, and D. H. Johnson Novel Strategies for the Treatment of Lung Cancer: Modulation of Eicosanoids J. Clin. Oncol., February 20, 2008; 26(6): 825 - 827. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Casciani, E. Marinoni, A. D. Bocking, M. Moscarini, R. Di Iorio, and J. R. G. Challis Opposite Effect of Phorbol Ester PMA on PTGS2 and PGDH mRNA Expression in Human Chorion Trophoblast Cells Reproductive Sciences, January 1, 2008; 15(1): 40 - 50. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. G. Buchanan, V. Holla, S. Katkuri, P. Matta, and R. N. DuBois Targeting Cyclooxygenase-2 and the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor for the Prevention and Treatment of Intestinal Cancer Cancer Res., October 1, 2007; 67(19): 9380 - 9388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Yang, J. M. Amann, T. Kikuchi, R. Porta, M. Guix, A. Gonzalez, K.-H. Park, D. Billheimer, C. L. Arteaga, H.-H. Tai, et al. Inhibition of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Signaling Elevates 15-Hydroxyprostaglandin Dehydrogenase in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Cancer Res., June 15, 2007; 67(12): 5587 - 5593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |