This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Data Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gormally, E. Articles by Hainaut, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gormally, E. Articles by Hainaut, P.

TP53 and KRAS2 Mutations in Plasma DNA of Healthy Subjects and Subsequent Cancer Occurrence: A Prospective Study

¹ IARC; ² Université Catholique de Lyon, Lyon, France; ³ Imperial College London and University of Torino; ⁴ ISI Foundation; ⁵ University of Torino, Turin, Italy; ⁶ Cancer Risk Factor Branch, Molecular Biology Laboratory, and ⁷ Molecular and Nutritional Epidemiology Unit, CSPO-Scientific Institute of Tuscany, Firenze, Italy; ⁸ Genetics Research Institute; ⁹ Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri; ¹⁰ Department of Epidemiology, National Cancer Istitute, Milan, Italy; ¹¹ Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine; ¹² Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Åalborg Hospital and Åarhus University Hospital, and Department of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Åarhus, Aarhus, Denmark; ¹³ Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge; ¹⁴ Medical Research Council Dunn Human Nutrition Unit, Cambridge, United Kingdom; ¹⁵ Institute of Cancer Epidemiology, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark; ¹⁶ Institute of Community Medicine, University of Tromso, Tromso, Norway; ¹⁷ Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U521, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; ¹⁸ German Institute of Human Nutrition, Potsdam-Rehbücke, Germany; ¹⁹ Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece; ²⁰ Ragusa Cancer Registry, Azienda Ospedaliera Civile MP Arezzo, Ragusa, Italy; ²¹ Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Università Federico II, Naples, Italy; ²² Center for Nutrition and Health, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands; ²³ Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands; ²⁴ Department of Epidemiology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; ²⁵ Andalusian School of Public Health, Granada, Spain; ²⁶ Department of Public Health of Guipuzkoa, San Sebastian, Spain; ²⁷ Public Health Institute, Navarra, Spain; ²⁸ Epidemiology Department, Murcia Health Council, Murcia, Spain; ²⁹ Dirección General de Salud Pública, Consejería de Salud y Servicios Sanitarios Asturias, Oviedo, Spain; ³⁰ Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umea, Sweden; and ³¹ Cancer Research UK Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, United Kingdom

Requests for reprints: Pierre Hainaut, IARC, 150 Cours Albert Thomas, 69372 Lyon Cedex 08, France. Phone: 33-4-72-73-85-32; Fax: 33-4-72-73-83-22; E-mail: hainaut{at}iarc.fr.

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
In cancer patients, plasma often contains mutant DNA released by cancer cells. We have assessed the significance of plasma DNA mutations for subsequent cancer development in healthy subjects in a large longitudinal prospective study. The European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study was analyzed with a nested case-control design. Cases were nonsmokers or ex-smokers for >10 years and newly diagnosed with lung, bladder, or upper aerodigestive tract cancers or leukemia accrued after a median follow-up of 6.3 years. Controls were matched 2:1 for follow-up, age, sex, area of recruitment, and smoking status. KRAS2 mutations were detected by mutant-enriched PCR and sequencing (n = 1,098). TP53 mutations were detected by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography, temporal temperature gradient electrophoresis, and sequencing (n = 550). KRAS2 or TP53 mutations were detected in 13 of 1,098 (1.2%) and 20 of 550 (3.6%) subjects, respectively, 16 of whom developed cancer on average after 18.3 months of follow-up. Among 137 subjects who developed bladder cancer, 5 had KRAS2 mutations [odds ratio (OR), 4.25; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.27-14.15] and 7 had TP53 mutations (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 0.66-4.97). There was a nonsignificant trend for association between TP53 mutations and bulky adducts in lymphocyte DNA (OR, 2.78; 95% CI, 0.64-12.17). This is the first report of TP53 or KRAS2 mutations in the plasma of healthy subjects in a prospective study, suggesting that KRAS2 mutation is detectable ahead of bladder cancer diagnosis. TP53 mutation may be associated with environmental exposures. These observations have implications for monitoring early steps of carcinogenesis. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(13): 6871-6)

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Circulating free DNA (CFDNA) in the plasma has emerged as a source of genetic material of tumoral origin in a variety of cancers. Somatic DNA alterations in CFDNA include point mutations, hypermethylation, microsatellite instability, and loss of heterozygosity (LOH; reviewed in ref. 1). For example, a special mutation at codon 249 in the tumor suppressor gene TP53 has been identified in 36% of African patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (2), with a concordance of 88% between plasma and tumor (3). This mutation is considered as the result of sequence-specific DNA damage by metabolites of aflatoxin, a well-known hepatocarcinogen that contaminates many components of traditional diet in sub-Saharan Africa. In the same population, TP53 mutations were also detected in the plasma of some subjects with liver cirrhosis (15%) or no liver disease (3%; ref. 2). However, the clinical utility of CFDNA for mutation screening remains to be ascertained.

Several clinical studies have reported that mutations detected in tumor tissues may also be detectable in plasma DNA (1). However, thus far, only one population-based, prospective study on detection of TP53 mutations in plasma DNA has been reported (4). In that study, TP53 mutations were detected 1 to 5 years before diagnosis in four of eight cases of hepatocellular carcinoma patients from Qidong (China), an area of high exposure to aflatoxin and high prevalence of hepatitis B virus chronic carriage (4). Mutations in KRAS2 have also been detected ahead of clinical diagnosis in the plasma of subjects considered at high risk for colorectal cancer (subjects with genetic predisposition or with previous history of cancer) as well as in patients referred to a colonoscopy clinic for symptomatic evaluation (5). Similarly, Allan et al. reported the presence in CFDNA of LOH at up to four different loci in patients attending a bronchoscopy clinic and presenting a variety of symptoms suggestive of lung cancer (6).

In this study, we have analyzed KRAS2 and TP53 mutations in CFDNA in a longitudinal study, in relation with the occurrence of different types of cancers potentially caused by environmental exposures. The Genetic Susceptibility to Air Pollution and Environmental Tobacco Smoking (GENAIR) study focuses on cancers of the lung, bladder, and upper aerodigestive tract (UADT; including pharynx, larynx, and oral cavity) and leukemias in nonsmokers and ex-smokers who have quitted for >10 years. GENAIR was conducted to elucidate the relationship among air pollution, environmental tobacco smoking, and genetic susceptibility (7, 8). It was designed as a case-control study nested into European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC), a multicenter European study of >520,000 healthy volunteers of both genders, ages 35 to 74 years, and recruited in 23 centers from 10 countries between 1993 and 1998 (9). A total of 550 subjects for TP53 mutations and 1,098 for KRAS2 mutations were analyzed.

	Materials and Methods

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Study design and subjects. EPIC is a multimember European study, coordinated by the IARC (Lyon, France), including >520,000 healthy volunteers recruited in 10 European countries (Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom) corresponding to 23 recruitment centers (10). The cohort includes subjects selected in the general population of a specific geographic area, town or province, of both genders and mostly in the age range 35 to 74 years at recruitment. Recruitment took place between 1993 and 1998. Detailed dietary and lifestyle histories collected mainly through self-administered questionnaires plus a 24-hour dietary recall through person-to person interview (in a 10% sample), anthropometric measurements, and a 30- to 40-mL blood sample are available. Blood samples were stored for 2 to 5 hours at 5°C to 10°C until they were transferred and processed in local laboratories in each but one of the recruitment centers (where specimens were shipped for processing to another center in the same country). The plasma, serum, RBC, and lymphocytes were stored at –196°C in 500 µL straws (7, 8, 10). All questionnaire information is available in a computerized format. Informed consent were obtained from all participants (11).

The follow-up was based on population cancer registries in seven of the participating countries: Denmark, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. In France, Germany, and Greece, a combination of methods was used, including health insurance records, cancer and pathology registries, and active follow-up through study participants and their next-of-kin. Mortality data were also obtained from either the cancer registry or mortality registries at the regional or national level. Follow-up was virtually 100% complete. We used the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Injuries and Causes of Death, 10th Revision.

GENAIR is a case-control study nested within the EPIC cohort, aiming at studying the relationship between some types of cancers and air pollution or environmental tobacco smoke (12). Cases are subjects with bladder, lung, or UADT cancers or leukemia, all newly diagnosed after recruitment. Only nonsmokers or ex-smokers who had given up smoking at least 10 years before recruitment have been included in GENAIR. We have identified 1,074 cases who met the protocol criteria. The Malmo center decided not to allow the use of their blood samples but participated in the rest of the project. After exclusion of the 231 Malmo cases, 843 cases were available, including 487 with blood samples (for further details, see the Peluso et al. study). Preliminary analyses suggested an association with bladder cancer. Thus, we analyzed all bladder cancers (n = 124); in addition, we enriched the series by extending follow-up (13 cases were identified in addition to the 124 described by Peluso et al.). Of the remaining cases of lung and UADT cancers and leukemia, we only analyzed a random sample of 254 cases matched 1:2 with controls for KRAS mutations. Because of the more demanding technical requirements for mutation detection, TP53 analysis was limited to a subset of 236 cases (including bladder cases) matched 1:1 with controls (Table 1 ). Matching criteria were gender, age (±5 years), smoking status (never or former smoker), site of recruitment, and follow-up time. Mean follow-up was 89 months (minimum, 1.8; maximum, 123). GENAIR has been approved by the Ethical Committee of the IARC and by the local ethical committees of the 23 centers.

KRAS2 mutations at codon 12 were analyzed by mutant-enriched PCR (ME-PCR), involving two successive RFLP leading to enrichment in mutant sequence, and characterized by sequencing (ref. 15; see Supplementary Material for primers and conditions). To avoid false-positive results generated during successive PCR rounds, all analyses were repeated at least once. We have found that KRAS2 codon 12 ME-PCR could detect up to 0.1% of mutant DNA in wild-type DNA. All mutations were confirmed by at least one second analysis and sequencing of independent PCR products. Results were scored as "positive" or "negative" with respect to established cutoff sensitivity values described above. However, no systematic attempt was made to obtain a quantitative assessment of the amount of gene mutation present in each sample.

Statistical analyses. We have computed odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) in logistic regression models. It was not possible to use conditional regression analysis for matched pairs because there was no pair in which both the case and the control(s) showed mutations. In addition to matching variables, we also fitted models, including educational level as a further adjustment variable. Ps < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant. All analyses were done using SAS Statistical Package version 8 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

	Results

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Table 1 shows the distribution of cancer types and mutations among the subjects whose plasma was analyzed. A total of 550 specimens were tested for TP53 (236 cases and 314 controls), whereas 1,098 specimens were tested for KRAS2 (385 cases and 713 controls). The imperfect matching was due to the lack of biological samples for either member of the matched pairs.

The extraction and quantification of CFDNA has been reported elsewhere (7). The geometric mean of CFDNA concentrations was 28 ng/mL in controls and varied between 29 and 36 ng/mL in the various cancer groups, the difference being nonsignificant. Typical examples of TP53 and KRAS2 mutation detection are shown in Fig. 1 . KRAS2 mutations were tested in 1,098 subjects (Tables 1 and 2A and B). Six mutations were detected in cancer cases (median follow-up, 14.3 months; range, 2.6-24.9 months), five of which were bladder cancers (OR, 4.25; 95% CI, 1.27-14.15; Tables 1 and 2A). After adjustment for sex, age, area of recruitment, and education, an OR (95% CI) of 5.15 (1.34-19.72) for bladder cancer was found. Among subjects with mutations, there were six healthy controls (median follow-up, 85.5 months; range, 72.7-97.3 months) plus one control who developed skin cancer during follow-up (80.2 months). In the 550 subjects analyzed for TP53 mutations (Table 1), 20 subjects had mutations at different codons, including 10 in cases, 7 of which were bladder cancers (Table 2A and B; OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 0.66-4.97). One bladder cancer case had two mutations at codons 207 and 216. With one exception (one subject with bladder cancer diagnosed 1.8 months after recruitment), mutations in CFDNA were detected at least 6 months ahead of diagnosis (median follow-up, 18.6 months; range, 1.8-44.8). For the 10 control subjects with TP53 mutation, the median follow-up was 75.4 months (range, 61.4-100.8 months), and one of them developed pancreatic cancer after 82.6 months (mutation in intron 4, bp 13028). TP53 mutations were classified in three groups. MT1 included missense mutations frequently reported in the IARC TP53 database (ref. 16; at least 18 independent reports; http://www-p53.iarc.fr, version R10). MT2 included rare missense mutations. MT3 included mutations with no known effect on protein structure, such as mutations in introns (not at splice junctions) and silent mutations, none of which were registered as polymorphisms in the IARC TP53 database. Taking into account only MT1 and MT2 groups, an OR (95% CI) for bladder cancer of 2.00 (0.66-6.06) was found, which was not significantly different than for any TP53 mutation.

View larger version (27K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Figure 1. KRAS2 (A) and TP53 (B) mutation detection in CFDNA. A, detection of mutations in codon 12 of KRAS2 by ME-PCR (involving two consecutive RFLP analyses for enrichment of the mutant DNA). After MvaI digestion, the mutant PCR product (MT; white arrow) is excised, amplified, and sequenced. Black arrow, wild-type PCR product (WT). B, detection of TP53 mutation at codon 282. Mutations in exons 5 to 9 were first analyzed in CFDNA by DHPLC. Samples with abnormal DHPLC chromatograms were sequenced from an independent PCR product. If the mutation could not be characterized by sequencing, a new PCR product was analyzed by TTGE. If homoduplex products were detected they were excised from the TTGE gel, reamplified, and sequenced. All procedures were repeated using independent PCR products to rule out PCR artifacts. Gray arrow, mutant-wild-type heteroduplexes; white arrow, mutant homoduplexes; black arrow, wild-type homoduplexes; white star, mutant control heteroduplexes (top two bands) and homoduplexes.

	Discussion

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

In bladder cancer tissues, TP53 mutations are rather rare in early lesions but are common in advanced, metastatic cancers, with a prevalence of 50% in progressive, muscle-invasive disease (19). Mutations at codon 12 of KRAS2 are infrequent in bladder cancer (20, 21). In a recent study, Jebar et al. have found KRAS2 mutations in 3 of 98 bladder cancer patients. However, these mutations were early events, mutually exclusive to FGFR3 mutations, suggesting their association with a subgroup of bladder cancers (22). Interestingly, experimental studies in transgenic mice have shown that tissue-specific expression of a RAS transgene in the urothelium led to urothelial hyperplasia and superficial papillary tumors (23). These observations suggest that activation of RAS may contribute to early steps of carcinogenesis in the bladder. Thus, the temporal sequence of occurrence of KRAS2 (early event) and TP53 (late event) during bladder tumorigenesis may explain our observation that KRAS2 mutation in CFDNA is a better predictor of bladder cancer than TP53 mutation. However, as tumor tissues were not available in the present study, we cannot ascertain whether the tumors also contained the same mutations as those identified in the plasma and whether these mutations occurred as early or late events.

TP53 and KRAS2 mutations were detected in 3% and 1%, respectively, of subjects who did not develop cancer during follow-up (10 TP53 mutations and 7 KRAS2 mutations). The proportion of mutations in controls remains low compared with subjects who developed bladder cancer (5.5% for TP53 and 3.8% for KRAS2). It should be kept in mind that controls were matched with cases for the duration of follow-up. Thus, it is possible that control subjects with mutations in CFDNA will ultimately develop a cancer disease after the period of matched follow-up. Of 65 controls subjects who developed cancer after follow-up, 2 had a TP53 or a KRAS2 mutation and were diagnosed with pancreas and skin cancer, respectively. These numbers are too small to be informative on the risk of cancer in positive, control subjects.

Another important information of the present study is that no predictive value of CFDNA mutations were found for several cancers other than bladder, including lung, UADT, and leukemia. This observation is in line with many studies showing considerable variations in the concordance between mutations detected in CFDNA and in tumors in cancer patients (1). Although some of these variations can be explained by technical considerations (e.g., the need for high sensitivity methods to detect mutations in CFDNA), they are most likely to reflect intrinsic differences among tissues in the way mutations occur, persist, expand clonally, and are released in CFDNA. In a recent study, we found an overall concordance of 88% between TP53 mutations in CFDNA and in matched primary liver cancer in a series of patients from western Africa (3). In contrast, in lung cancers, recent studies have reported an overall poor concordance between mutations in CFDNA and tumor (24). Thus, the occurrence of mutations in CFDNA may have organ- and tissue-specific patterns that reflect the architecture of the organ (e.g., the proportion of released DNA that ends up in the bloodstream), the type and level of exposure to mutagens, and the temporal sequence of occurrence of mutations in the target tissue. Thus, in bladder cancer, molecular alterations, such as mutations in FGFR3 and microsatellite instabilities, which occur in bladder transitional cell carcinoma at higher frequencies than either TP53 or KRAS2 mutations (30-40% and up to 70% alterations respectively; refs. 25–27), may provide additional, sensitive markers for CFDNA screening.

In the GENAIR study, several genetic polymorphisms have been assessed in relation to cancer risk. The rationale for analyzing these polymorphisms as candidates is explained by Matullo et al. (17). Our results suggest a tendency for plasma DNA mutation to correlate with exposure and/or susceptibility to environmental mutagens. Two polymorphisms showed a suggestive tendency for association with CFDNA mutations. The codon 399 Gln allele (A/A genotype) of XRCC1 is a potential biomarker of susceptibility to chemically induced genetic damage (28). The "slow acetylator" phenotype of NAT2, a carcinogen-metabolizing enzyme involved in the inactivation of arylamines, is suspected to determine an increasing risk for bladder cancer (29). Thus, mutations in the CFDNA of healthy subjects may reflect the effect of ongoing exposures to environmental carcinogens, particularly in subjects who have genetic polymorphisms that predispose to higher levels of mutagenic damage by such carcinogens. This interpretation is consistent with the results of studies on TP53 mutations at codon 249 in the plasma DNA of healthy subjects from regions of high incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in The Gambia, West Africa (3) and in Qidong, China (4). This mutation is considered as a "fingerprint" of mutagenesis by aflatoxins, and its presence in the plasma of subjects without cancer may reflect ongoing, dietary exposure to this carcinogen. In the present study, the potential exposures are more diverse and less characterized and pervasive as aflatoxin in The Gambia and in Qidong. Overall, these observations have implication for the use of CFDNA mutations as indicators of disease in prospective studies. The rarity of mutations in both cases and controls is a limitation for their use in clinical cancer detection. Further investigations are needed to determine whether it is possible to discriminate disease-associated from exposure-associated CFDNA mutations based on mutation patterns and quantitative accrual over time of mutant DNA in the plasma.

	Acknowledgments

 
Grant support: Compagnia di San Paolo (Torino) and Lega Italiana per la Lotta contro i Tumori (P. Vineis). Support for the EPIC study: "Europe Against Cancer" Programme of the European Commission; Ligue contre le Cancer (France); Société 3M (France); Mutuelle Générale de l'Education Nationale; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale; German Cancer Aid; German Cancer Research Center; German Federal Ministry of Education and Research; Danish Cancer Society; Health Research Fund of the Spanish Ministry of Health; the participating regional governments and institutions of Spain; Cancer Research UK; Medical Research Council (United Kingdom); Stroke Association (United Kingdom); British Heart Foundation; Department of Health (United Kingdom); Food Standards Agency (United Kingdom); Wellcome Trust (United Kingdom); Greek Ministry of Health; Greek Ministry of Education; Italian Association for Research on Cancer; Italian National Research Council; Dutch Ministry of Public Health, Welfare and Sports; Dutch Ministry of Health; Dutch Prevention Funds; LK Research Funds; Dutch Zorg Onderzoek Nederland; World Cancer Research Fund; Swedish Cancer Society; Swedish Scientific Council; and Regional Government of Skane, Sweden.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

We thank G. Tchoua, G. Martel-Planche, D. Dulac, and M. Dupasquier for technical assistance.

	Footnotes

 
Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Research Online (http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/).

Genetic Susceptibility to Air Pollution and Environmental Tobacco Smoking is a program of the European Community (QL4-1999-000927).

³² H. Autrup et al. in preparation.

Received 12/22/05. Revised 4/13/06. Accepted 4/28/06.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 

1. Ziegler A, Zangemeister-Wittke U, Stahel RA. Circulating DNA: a new diagnostic gold mine? Cancer Treat Rev 2002;28:255–71.[CrossRef][Medline]
2. Kirk GD, Lesi OA, Mendy M, et al. 249(Ser) TP53 mutation in plasma DNA, hepatitis B viral infection, and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene 2005;24:5858–67.[CrossRef][Medline]
3. Szymanska K, Lesi OA, Kirk GD, et al. Ser-249TP53 mutation in tumour and plasma DNA of hepatocellular carcinoma patients from a high incidence area in The Gambia, West Africa. Int J Cancer 2004;110:374–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
4. Jackson PE, Kuang SY, Wang JB, et al. Prospective detection of codon 249 mutations in plasma of hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Carcinogenesis 2003;24:1657–63.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Kopreski MS, Benko FA, Borys DJ, et al. Somatic mutation screening: identification of individuals harboring K-ras mutations with the use of plasma DNA. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:918–23.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6. Allan JM, Hardie LJ, Briggs JA, et al. Genetic alterations in bronchial mucosa and plasma DNA from individuals at high risk of lung cancer. Int J Cancer 2001;91:359–65.[CrossRef][Medline]
7. Gormally E, Hainaut P, Caboux E, et al. Amount of DNA in plasma and cancer risk: a prospective study. Int J Cancer 2004;111:746–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
8. Peluso M, Hainaut P, Airoldi L, et al. Methodology of laboratory measurements in prospective studies on gene-environment interactions: the experience of GenAir. Mutat Res 2005;574:92–104.[Medline]
9. Bingham S, Riboli E. Diet and cancer—the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Nat Rev Cancer 2004;4:206–15.[CrossRef][Medline]
10. Kaaks R, Berrino F, Key T, et al. Serum sex steroids in premenopausal women and breast cancer risk within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:755–65.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Riboli E, Hunt KJ, Slimani N, et al. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC): study populations and data collection. Public Health Nutr 2002;5:1113–24.[CrossRef][Medline]
12. Peluso M, Munnia A, Hoek G, et al. DNA adducts and lung cancer risk: a prospective study. Cancer Res 2005;65:8042–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. le Calvez F, Ahman A, Tonisson N, et al. Arrayed primer extension resequencing of mutations in the TP53 tumor suppressor gene: comparison with denaturing HPLC and direct sequencing. Clin Chem 2005;51:1284–7.[Free Full Text]
14. Taniere P, Martel-Planche G, Puttawibul P, et al. TP53 mutations and MDM2 gene amplification in squamous-cell carcinomas of the esophagus in south Thailand. Int J Cancer 2000;88:223–7.[CrossRef][Medline]
15. Mulcahy HE, Lyautey J, Lederrey C, et al. A prospective study of K-ras mutations in the plasma of pancreatic cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 1998;4:271–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Olivier M, Eeles R, Hollstein M, et al. The IARC TP53 database: new online mutation analysis and recommendations to users. Hum Mutat 2002;19:607–14.[CrossRef][Medline]
17. Matullo G, Dunning AM, Guarrera S, et al. DNA repair polymorphisms and cancer risk in non-smokers in a cohort study. Carcinogenesis 2006. Epub.
18. Jacobs G, Tscholl E, Sek A, et al. Enrichment polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Ki-ras mutations: relevance of Taq polymerase error rate, initial DNA copy number, and reaction conditions on the emergence of false-positive mutant bands. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1999;125:395–401.[CrossRef][Medline]
19. Al Sukhun S, Hussain M. Current understanding of the biology of advanced bladder cancer. Cancer 2003;97:2064–75.[CrossRef][Medline]
20. Olderoy G, Daehlin L, Ogreid D. Low-frequency mutation of Ha-ras and Ki-ras oncogenes in transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Anticancer Res 1998;18:2675–8.[Medline]
21. Uchida T, Wada C, Ishida H, et al. Infrequent involvement of mutations on neurofibromatosis type 1, H-ras, K-ras and N-ras in urothelial tumors. Urol Int 1995;55:63–7.[CrossRef][Medline]
22. Jebar AH, Hurst CD, Tomlinson DC, et al. FGFR3 and Ras gene mutations are mutually exclusive genetic events in urothelial cell carcinoma. Oncogene 2005;24:5218–25.[CrossRef][Medline]
23. Zhang ZT, Pak J, Huang HY, et al. Role of Ha-ras activation in superficial papillary pathway of urothelial tumor formation. Oncogene 2001;20:1973–80.[CrossRef][Medline]
24. Trombino S, Neri M, Puntoni R, et al. Mutations in K-ras codon 12 detected in plasma DNA are not an indicator of disease in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Chem 2005;51:1313–4.[Free Full Text]
25. Bakkar AA, Wallerand H, Radvanyi F, et al. FGFR3 and TP53 gene mutations define two distinct pathways in urothelial cell carcinoma of the bladder. Cancer Res 2003;63:8108–12.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26. Hoque MO, Lee CC, Cairns P, Schoenberg M, Sidransky D. Genome-wide genetic characterization of bladder cancer: a comparison of high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays and PCR-based microsatellite analysis. Cancer Res 2003;63:2216–22.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27. van Rhijn BW, Lurkin I, Radvanyi F, et al. The fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) mutation is a strong indicator of superficial bladder cancer with low recurrence rate 8. Cancer Res 2001;61:1265–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28. Wang Y, Spitz MR, Zhu Y, et al. From genotype to phenotype: correlating XRCC1 polymorphisms with mutagen sensitivity. DNA Repair (Amst) 2003;2:901–8.
29. Green J, Banks E, Berrington A, et al. N-acetyltransferase 2 and bladder cancer: an overview and consideration of the evidence for gene-environment interaction. Br J Cancer 2000;83:412–7.[CrossRef][Medline]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Wei, P. Patel, W. Liao, K. Chaudhry, L. Zhang, M. Arellano-Garcia, S. Hu, D. Elashoff, H. Zhou, S. Shukla, et al. Electrochemical Sensor for Multiplex Biomarkers Detection Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2009; 15(13): 4446 - 4452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Marchetti, G. Gasparini, M. Albitar, C. Yeh, W. Ma, W. De Roock, D. Lambrechts, S. Tejpar, T. Winder, W. Scheithauer, et al. K-ras Mutations and Cetuximab in Colorectal Cancer N. Engl. J. Med., February 19, 2009; 360(8): 833 - 836. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. A. Hirschowitz Biomarkers for Lung Cancer Screening: Interpretation and Implications of an Early Negative Advanced Validation Study Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 1, 2009; 179(1): 1 - 2. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Sozzi, L. Roz, D. Conte, L. Mariani, F. Andriani, S. Lo Vullo, C. Verri, and U. Pastorino Plasma DNA Quantification in Lung Cancer Computed Tomography Screening: Five-Year Results of a Prospective Study Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 1, 2009; 179(1): 69 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Wei, J. Wang, W. Liao, B. G. Zimmermann, D. T. Wong, and C.-M. Ho Electrochemical detection of low-copy number salivary RNA based on specific signal amplification with a hairpin probe Nucleic Acids Res., June 1, 2008; 36(11): e65 - e65. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Data Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gormally, E. Articles by Hainaut, P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gormally, E. Articles by Hainaut, P.