| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Molecular Biology, Pathobiology, and Genetics |
but not PKC
Suppresses Intestinal Tumor Formation in ApcMin/+ Mice
1 Laboratory for Signal Transduction, Max Planck Institute of Experimental Endocrinology and 2 Department of Nephrology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
Requests for reprints: Michael Leitges, Department of Internal Medicine/Nephrology, Hannover Medical School, Carl Neuberg Strasse Nr. 1, Hannover, Germany 30625. Phone: 49-511-5359-127; Fax: 49-511-5359-186; E-mail: michael.leitges{at}mpihan.mpg.de.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and PKC
in colorectal cancer. Both isoforms were found to be strongly down-regulated in intestinal tumors of ApcMin/+ mice. A deletion of PKC
did not affect tumorigenesis in this animal model. In contrast, PKC
-deficient ApcMin/+ mice developed more aggressive tumors and died significantly earlier than their PKC
-proficient littermates. Even without an additional Apc mutation, PKC
knockout mice showed an elevated tendency to develop spontaneous intestinal tumors. Transcriptional profiling revealed a role for this kinase in regulating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling and proposed a synergistic mechanism for EGFR/activator protein and WNT/APC pathways in mediating intestinal tumor development. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(14): 6955-63) | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
10% of all cancer-related deaths (>50,000 cases in 2005) in the United States (1). The risk to acquire colorectal cancer is heavily influenced by lifestyle, but about 20% to 30% of all cases can be attributed to genetic predisposition; 3% to 5% of all patients derive from genetically characterized high-risk families (2). Additionally, about 80% of all forms of sporadic colorectal cancer are characterized by one or more mutations in the adenomatous polyposis coli (Apc) gene, of which about 60% result in the expression of a truncated version of the corresponding protein (3). APC forms a multimeric complex with the adaptor protein AXIN2 and glycogen synthase kinase 3ß (GSK-3ß), which regulates nuclear accumulation of ß-CATENIN, a signal transducer of the WNT pathway (4). When the APC/ß-CATENIN complex is destabilized due to Apc mutations, ß-CATENIN binds and activates transcription factors of the T-cell factor/lymphoid enhancer factor (TCF/LEF) family that regulate the expression of potent oncogenes like c-Myc or c-Met (5).
The protein kinase C (PKC) family of serine/threonine kinases comprises at least 11 isozymes in mammals. According to structural and activation criteria, PKCs are divided into three subfamilies: classical (or conventional) PKCs [cPKC: PKC
, PKCß (comprising the two splice variants ß1 and ß2), and the neuron-specific PKC
], novel PKCs (nPKC: PKC
, PKC
, PKC
, and PKC
), and atypical PKCs (aPKC: PKC
/
, PKC
, and PKM
), an alternatively transcribed, constitutively active variant of PKC
, the expression of which is restricted to the central nervous system and the spinal cord (6). The activation of cPKC and nPKC isoforms typically involves recruitment to membranes and interaction with and allosteric activation by diacylglycerol. For aPKCs, activation can be driven in part by interaction with the CDC42/GTP/PAR6 complex, which binds to the PB1 domain of aPKCs. In each case, the allosteric effects of these lipids/proteins on PKC isoforms lead to a loss of the inhibition exerted by an inhibitory pseudosubstrate sequence that otherwise occupies the catalytic site of the enzyme (7).
PKCs have been shown to participate in signaling pathways regulating a plethora of biological functions, including cell growth, differentiation, apoptosis, transformation, and tumor development (8). There is evidence that the wide spectrum of PKC-mediated signaling is organized by isotype specificity that despite the broad overlapping substrate specificities is defined via unique expression patterns, intracellular localization, and specific binding partners (9). The initial observation that PKCs can be activated by phorbol esters suggested a role for these enzymes in tumor promotion (10). However, with the development of more selective pharmacologic inhibitors and of molecular and genetic tools to directly target single PKC isoforms, distinct and sometimes opposing roles have been shown for different PKCs in cell growth and differentiation (11). Even the action of one single isotype may vary with different cell types or in vivo systems studied. For example PKC
has been proposed to act both as tumor promoter and a tumor suppressor in intestinal cancer via multiple signaling pathways (12).
To further clarify the role of different PKC isoforms in the development and progression of colorectal cancer in vivo, we studied the consequences of PKC genetic depletion on tumor development in the ApcMin/+ (multiple intestinal neoplasia) mouse model. ApcMin/+ animals harbor a nonsense mutation at codon 850 of the Apc gene (13). Although homozygous animals die before birth, all heterozygous mice develop multiple adenomas throughout the entire intestinal tract at an early age (14), which made them a widely used model for studying colorectal cancer biology.
In this study, we show that of six PKC isoforms significantly expressed in the ApcMin/+ intestine, PKC
and PKC
are down-regulated in tumor tissues. Loss of PKC
increases tumor numbers, promotes adenoma to adenocarcinoma transition, and reduces survival rates in ApcMin/+ mice, whereas deletion of PKC
does not affect intestinal carcinogenesis in this model. Already in the absence of an Apc mutation, a PKC
deficiency favors intestinal polyp formation. Transcriptional profiling revealed that the epidermal growth factor (EGF) Betacellulin (Btc) is up-regulated in the absence of PKC
, and that EGF and WNT signals may synergistically promote cancer development via shared transcriptional targets.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
/ (15) and PKC
/ (16) mice were kept on a 129S2/Sv background. Most of the APCMin/+/PKCdeficient animals were on a mixed 129S2/Sv x C57BL/6J background. For polyp/tumor scoring and the establishment of survival curves, all animals received high nutrient food (Teklad #2019 extruded, Harlan Winkelmann, Borchen, Germany) and water ad libitum, whereas mating pairs were fed on standard mouse chow (ssniff M-Z, sniff Spezialdiäten, Soest, Germany).
In situ hybridization. In situ hybridization (ISH) using 35S-UTP-labeled RNA probes was done on 7-µm sections from paraformaldehyde-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples as described (17). The primers used to PCR amplify PKC cDNA templates from reverse transcribed E14.5 embryo total RNA preparations were as follows: PKC
, 5'-CCATCAGTGGGAAGTGATCC-3' and 5'-TGGTTGTGCTATGATGACTG-3'; PKCß, 5'-CCCACATCGACAGAGAGGTT-3' and 5'-AGTTTCATCCGGTCCCTGTT-3'; PKC
, 5'-TCTGCAGTCACTGTACCGACTT-3' and 5'-GCTTTCACGGTCTTTGTCTTCT-3'; PKC
, 5'-GCGAGGGAAGACACTGGTAC-3' and 5'-CGGCCGATAATCTTGTCAAT-3'; PKC
, 5'-TTGGACCCCTACATTGCCCTTAAC-3' and 5'-TGTAGTTGTGGATCCCGAAC-3'; PKC
, 5'-GCACTCGCTCTTCAAAAAGG-3' and 5'-GCAAGTGCAGGCTGTAACAA-3'; PKC
, 5'-CTTGTCAGGGAGAGGCAGTG-3' and 5'-ATCGCTGCATTACACTGTCG-3'. Probes for PKC
/
and PKC
were as described (6). After hybridization and washing, slides were dipped in Kodak NTB-2 emulsion (Kodak, Stuttgart, Germany) and counterstained with Hoechst dye (Sigma-Aldrich, Seelze, Germany). Artificially colored dark field and blue fluorescence micrographs of the same area were captured on a Leica DMR microscope (Leica Microsystems, Bensheim, Germany) using an Olympus DP50 CCD camera (Olympus, Hamburg, Germany) and overlaid using Photoshop software (Adobe, San Jose, CA).
Quantitative PCR. Tumor and adjacent normal tissue samples were dissected from PBS-rinsed, methylene bluestained intestinal preparations under a dissecting microscope. Total RNA was extracted using the QIAGEN RNeasy micro kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and reverse transcribed with Thermoscript RT (Invitrogen, Paisley, United Kingdom). Quantitative PCR was done on an iCycler thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) with iQ SYBR Green supermix (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer's protocols. Primers used were as follows: Ef1
, 5'-AATTCACCAACACCAGCAGCAA-3' and 5'-TGCCCCAGGACACAGAGACTTCA-3'; PKC
, 5'-GCCCGAGGGAGAGAGGGATG-3' and 5'-TGGGGAGGCATTTGATCTTTCATTT-3'; PKCß, 5'-CCGGTGTGGATGGCTGGTTC-3' and 5'-GCCTTTCCCCAGCACCATCA-3'; PKC
, 5'-CTTTGGTGCCAGCCCAGGAC-3' and 5'-CAGGACCTCGGCCTCCCAAT-3'; PKC
, 5'-TGCAGCATCAGGCCAAGGTG-3' and 5'-CAGCGTTGCATTGCCTGCAT-3'; PKC
, 5'-TCCCTGCTCTGGGGCCTCTT-3' and 5'-GGTGCCGATCCTAAACCCAGGA-3'; PKC
, 5'-CGCCAGTTAGAGCCGCCTTTC-3' and 5'-GGCTACAGTTGCAATTCCGGTGA-3'; PKC
, 5'-GCAGGGTTACCAGTGCCGACAG-3' and 5'-TCGGTGGTGGACGTTCATGC-3'; PKC
/
, 5'-AGGAACGATTGGGTTGTCAC-3' and 5'-AGGAACGATTGGGTTGTCAC-3'; PKC
, 5'-GCCTCCCTTCCAGCCCCAGA-3' and 5'-CACGGACTCCTCAGCAGACAGCA-3'; Btc, 5'-TGCCACGCTGGGTCCTATTT-3' and 5'-CCAAACCGATCCCTGCACTC-3'; Jun, 5'-GCATGAGGAACCGCATTGC-3' and 5'-GCCACCTGTTCCCTGAGCAT-3'; Axin2, 5'-AAGAGAAGCGACCCAGTCAATC-3' and 5'-AGCTGTTTCTTACTCCCCATGC-3'. Single well amplification efficiency estimation and relative quantification of expression levels were done as described (18).
Intestinal polyp scoring. Mice of the specified age were sacrificed by cervical dislocation, and whole intestines were immediately removed and incubated with ice-cold PBS. Small intestines were divided into three sections of equal length ("proximal," "medial," and "distal"), and colons (including the proximal part of the rectum) were separated from the cecum and the rectal opening. All sections were carefully rinsed with ice-cold PBS, split longitudinally, and mounted between two glass slides. Tumors/polyps were counted after paraformaldehyde fixation and methylene blue staining under a dissecting microscope using 10-fold magnification.
Histologic analysis and immunohistochemistry. Intestinal samples were split longitudinally and fixed with paraffin in a Swiss roll preparation at 4°C overnight. After dehydration and paraffin embedding, 7-µm sections were either used for Harris' H&E-xylene histologic staining (protocol adopted from http://science.peru.edu/gregarina/html/harris.html) or submitted to immunohistochemical staining. Primary rabbit anti-phospho-extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 (anti-phospho-ERK1/2; pT185/pY187; Biomol, Matford Court, United Kingdom) and anti-ERK1/2 (Stressgen, San Diego, CA) antibodies were used at a 1:200 dilution. Primary rabbit anti-phospho-EGF receptor (anti-phospho-EGFR; pY1086, Biosource, Camarillo, CA), anti-phospho-histone H3 (pS10, Upstate, Charlottesville, VA), and goat anti-BTC (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) antibodies were used at 1:100 dilution. Biotin/avidin amplification (Vectastain Elite kit, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and 3,3'-diaminobenzidine/nickel staining were done as described (17).
Microarray analysis. Affymetrix MG 430A 2.0 mouse genome arrays (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) were hybridized with biotin-labeled cRNA samples from total RNA preparations (QIAGEN RNeasy micro kit) from wild-type and PKC
/ small intestine samples (s.a.) at the RZPD Deutsches Ressourcenzentrum für Genomforschung, Berlin, Germany. Sample normalization (PM/MM model), probe set comparison (mutant versus wild-type signal: >1.5 or <0.67, lower 90% confidence bound; signal difference > 50) and hierarchical clustering were done using dChip 1.3 software (19). All array data have been submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information GEO data base (accession nos. GSM89632 to GSM89634 and GSE3915).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and PKC
are down-regulated in ApcMin/+ intestinal tumors. To specifically investigate the regulation of PKC expression in the ApcMin/+ mouse model, we used isoform-specific ISH and quantitative real-time PCR approaches. Of nine isoforms tested [
, ß (including both ß1 and ß2),
,
,
,
,
,
/
, and
], only six (
, ß,
,
,
/
, and
) were detected by ISH in the murine intestine (Fig. 1A
). Comparison between tumor and normal tissue signals revealed a strong up-regulation of PKCß, PKC
/
and, to a lesser extent, PKC
as well as a significant down-regulation of PKC
and PKC
, whereas PKC
expression was not regulated. To confirm these findings and quantify the expression changes in the regulated transcripts, we repeated these measurements by quantitative PCR on total RNA extractions from ApcMin/+ tumors and adjacent normal tissue samples (Fig. 1B). In this assay, PKCß was most strongly up-regulated (10.5-fold) followed by PKC
/
(4.6-fold) and PKC
(1.7-fold). Again, PKC
and PKC
appeared down-regulated in tumors (7.6- and 5.5-fold, respectively), whereas all other isoforms were not differentially expressed.
|
but not PKC
deficiency enhances tumor formation in the intestine of ApcMin/+ mice. The differential regulation of some isoforms suggested an involvement of these PKCs in the molecular processes underlying tumor formation. Because the up-regulated isoforms had recently been characterized in other animal models for intestinal cancer (20, 21), we here focused first on the two down-regulated species: PKC
and PKC
. Both transcripts have been reported to be consistently down-regulated in other cancer models (22, 23) and in human patients (24, 25), which reassured us that the chosen mouse model is an appropriate tool for studying the role of these enzymes in human colorectal cancer.
We crossbred PKC
- and PKC
-deficient animals with ApcMin/+ mice to generate double-heterozygous offspring. Intercrosses from the F1 generation produced both PKC+/+- and PKC-deficient ApcMin/+ animals, which were used for further analysis. We scored intestinal polyps at three different stages. Although at 2 months of age neither PKC
- nor PKC
-deficient animals displayed different numbers in intestinal polyps, in older animals, PKC
deletion resulted in 1.5- to 2-fold higher numbers of intestinal tumors (Fig. 2A
and Fig. 4B), whereas PKC
deletion did not have any significant effect (Fig. 2B).
|
|
+/ mice to C57BL/6J for four generations (N4) and reevaluated tumor formation in the offspring from these animals. Tumor numbers were still increased in the absence of PKC
in these animals, confirming our observations from the mixed background (Supplementary Fig. S1A).
Distribution of tumors in ApcMin/+ mice is unaffected by PKC
or PKC
deletion. We further asked whether the frequency of tumors along the intestine has changed among the various genotypes. Therefore, we compared the distribution of lesions along the small and large intestine, and for all stages, we did not find any alterations after deletion of either PKC
(Fig. 2C) or PKC
(Fig. 2D). Comparable results were obtained from the C57BL/6J backcrosses (Supplementary Fig. S1B). We therefore conclude that in the ApcMin/+ model, PKC
suppresses tumor formation in all areas of the intestinal tract (including the colon), whereas PKC
deficiency has no consequences on cancer development.
PKC
but not PKC
deficiency reduces survival rates of ApcMin/+ animals. To test if the observed altered tumor formation had consequences on latency, we monitored survival in both PKC
- and PKC
-deficient ApcMin/+ mice. Because food composition can strongly influence intestinal tumor formation in men and mice (reviewed in ref. 27), for this study, all animals received a standardized elevated fat/protein diet after weaning. The mice were monitored daily and sacrificed when moribund. The primary cause of morbidity in all genotypes was intestinal obstruction and rectal prolapse as a result of tumors of the distal colonic and rectal region. As expected from the elevated tumor numbers, PKC
deficiency significantly reduced survival in ApcMin/+ mice (Fig. 3A
). Because PKC
deletion, again, did not influence results in this setup (Fig. 3B), we restricted subsequent experiments on PKC
.
|
-deficient ApcMin/+ mice show a more aggressive histopathologic phenotype. Tumors from ApcMin/+ and ApcMin/+ PKC
/ littermates (ages 4 months, n = 8) were evaluated for histopathologic features. Whole preparations of full intestinal tracts revealed increased numbers of tumors penetrating the outer muscular layers of the small intestine in PKC
/ animals [Fig. 4A
, black arrows; 7.4 ± 1.5 (ApcMin/+ PKC
/) versus 2.9 ± 0.8 (ApcMin/+ PKC
+/+) per animal]. Longitudinal sections through the small intestine and colon displayed higher numbers of tumors along the whole intestine but no significant increase in tumor diameter (Fig. 4B). The majority of all tumors from both genotypes were classified (according to ref. 28) as adenomas with restriction of the malignant tissue to the epithelial layers (Fig. 4C) and well-structured glandular architecture (Fig. 4C, inset). An elevated number of tumors in the PKC
-deficient animals, however, displayed more aggressive features with progression of the tumor tissue into the muscular layers, necrotic areas in central parts of the lesion (Fig. 4D), and overall less differentiated structure with pronounced scirrhous features (Fig. 4D, inset).
Taken together, these data clearly show a more aggressive nature of tumors in the PKC
-deficient background and may likely explain the increased mortality in these animals.
PKC
inhibits polyp formation in Apc+/+ animals. The presented results thus far show a prominent role for PKC
in APC-mediated carcinogenesis. We next evaluated if a deletion of PKC
alone can affect tumor development in the intestinal tract. 129Sv wild-type mice do not display elevated spontaneous tumor formation (29). PKC
/ mice are fertile and seem overall normal but show mild defects in insulin signaling and an impairment in a certain context of cerebellar long-term synaptic depression (15, 30). They do, however, not display overt predisposition to cancer during their normal lifetime (our own observations). We therefore analyzed PKC
/ animals and age-matched wild-type controls (12 months) for small intestinal polyps and tumors. Interestingly, both wild-type and mutant animals were found to spontaneously develop sporadic lesions. The majority of these lesions were classified as aberrant crypt foci or unicryptal polyps, but sporadic adenomas of an early stage were also detected in PKC
deficient animals (Supplementary Fig. S2). In both genotypes, lesions were found to originate either from the epithelial cells or from the villus stroma. The muscular layer was never affected nor did any of the tumors show progression to the carcinoma stage. Overall, the number of lesions was approximately doubled in PKC
/ mice with slightly pronounced effectiveness in the proximal parts of the intestinal tract (Fig. 5A
), indicating that PKC
shows tumor-suppressive effects independent of the Min mutation. The elevated number of tumors in the PKC
-deficient animals was accompanied by a higher mitotic index in the intestinal crypts (Supplementary Fig. S3), indicating that PKC
suppresses tumor formation via negative regulation of cell division.
|
/ intestine reveals up-regulation of Btc and its target Jun but shows no effect on WNT target gene expression. To identify the molecular targets conferring the tumor-suppressive effects of PKC
in the murine intestine, we did transcriptional profiling by oligonucleotide microarray analysis on small intestine preparations from wild-type and PKC
-deficient animals. After normalization, we found a relatively small number of significantly regulated genes, the strongest of which (
1.5-fold up-regulated or down-regulated) are listed in Fig. 5B. PKC
was strongly down-regulated (7.7-fold) as would be expected in the knockout. Interestingly, among the up-regulated genes, we found two known oncogenes: the EGF Btc (31) and the activating protein-1 (AP-1) component Jun (reviewed in ref. 32). The microarray results were evaluated by quantitative PCR on a couple of selected genes (Fig. 5C). As expected, PKC
was found to be absent in the PKC
/ intestine in both set ups (7.7-fold versus 12.5-fold down-regulation, microarray versus quantitative PCR, respectively), whereas Btc and Jun seemed consistently up-regulated (1.8-fold versus 2.0-fold and 1.5-fold versus 1.4-fold, respectively). The up-regulation of Btc was confirmed on the protein level. Although in the wild-type intestine BTC was only detected in the Paneth cells (Fig. 5D, black arrows), strong expression was seen in epithelial and stroma cells of the PKC
-deficient intestine (Fig. 5D, black and open arrows). Expression of WNT target genes, like Axin2, was not significantly different between the wild-type and PKC
/ intestine (Fig. 5C).
Taken together, these data further strengthen our previous finding that PKC
deficiency does not directly affect WNT/APC signaling. They instead propose a role for this kinase in the regulation of the EGFR/AP-1 pathway.
PKC
and APC influence EGF signaling via synergistic regulation of EGFR target gene transcription. To further corroborate these findings, we evaluated transcriptional regulation of WNT/APC and EGFR/AP-1 downstream target genes in the different Apc and PKC
genotypes. In agreement with other reports, the WNT target Axin2 was up-regulated in the ApcMin/+ normal intestine with even higher expression in tumor tissues (Fig. 6A
). An additional deletion of PKC
, however, did not influence this transcriptional activation (Fig. 6A). On the other hand, Btc, which is itself AP-1 regulated, was not significantly up-regulated by the Apc mutation alone. However, a deletion of PKC
increased Btc transcript levels, and this effect was potentiated in the ApcMin/+ PKC
/ intestine (Fig. 6B). Similar regulation was observed for the AP-1 target Jun (data not shown). We therefore speculated that due to the up-regulation of an EGFR ligand in the PKC
deficiency, EGFR signaling via an autocrine loop might be increased. EGFR activation is accompanied by autophosphorylation at several tyrosine residues. We assessed EGFR activation by phospho-specific antibodies in the PKC
-deficient intestine. Deletion of PKC
increased EGFR phosphorylation in both wild-type and Apc+/min animals (Fig. 6C), indicating that the observed transcriptional response is indeed mediated via enhanced EGFR signaling.
|
mutant tissues (Fig. 6D). Although in the wild-type intestine activated ERK1/2 was exclusively detected in Paneth cells and the bottom of the crypts, in the PKC
mutant, we in addition found elevated phospho-ERK levels all along the rim of the villi. In ApcMin/+ animals, ERK phosphorylation was restricted to Paneth cells and crypts but extended significantly more from the bottom of the crypts towards the tip of the villi. In ApcMin/+ PKC
/ mice, however, phospho-ERK immunoreactivity was strongly detected in the Paneth cells as well as all along the border of the intestinal mucosa. This increased ERK1/2 activation was not paralleled by an elevated protein level of ERK1/2; instead, ERK1/2 base levels were comparable in all genotypes (Supplementary Fig. S4).
In summary, these results suggest a role of PKC
in the regulation of EGFR signaling via inhibition of the MAPK pathway. In the case of an Apc mutation, EGFR and WNT signaling converge on the transcription of AP-1 target genes and by that may synergistically promote intestinal tumor formation.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
as tumor suppressor in intestinal cancer. Deletion of PKC
but not of PKC
promotes polyp formation in wild-type mice and in the ApcMin/+ tumor model. In the latter, activation of EGFR (via PKC
deletion) and WNT (via APC mutation) pathways synergistically induce AP-1 target genes, resulting in increased numbers of tumors and accelerated progression to more aggressive stages.
We started this analysis by evaluating PKC transcription in normal tissue and in early tumors of the ApcMin/+ intestine. Previous studies had already been published summarizing PKC expression in this mouse model based on antibody (33) or microarray approaches (34, 35), in some cases with quite contrary results. For example, PKCß was found to be up-regulated in ApcMin/+ adenomas by Leclerc et al., weakly down-regulated by Klein et al., and both up-regulated and down-regulated (depending on the probe set) at the same time by Paoni et al. Both microarray (sample dissection and processing) and immunohistochemistry (antibody specificity) set ups have their pitfalls; thus, we chose RNA ISH as our main approach. All probes were carefully checked for sequence homologies to guarantee isotype specificity, whereas the use of 35S labeling allows for a faithful estimation of expression levels with a resolution close to that of antibody stainings. In addition, quantitative PCR was used to validate the results obtained from the ISH data. Overall, our data mostly confirmed those from the abovementioned studies. Specifically, PKC
down-regulation was reported by both Paoni and Klein, whereas no clear regulation was seen by Leclerc. The results for PKCß were quite contrary in the previous reports (see above), but patient data (e.g., ref. 36) and reports from other animal models (37, 38) support our and Leclerc's findings. Weak regulation of PKC
was also seen in all other studies. Our PKC
data fits to those from Klein, but opposing regulation was reported from Paoni et al. These different findings likely result from the comparably low overall expression of this enzyme. Interestingly, PKC
has been implicated in mediating cancer development and wound healing in the skin, and PKC
expression is elevated in proliferating epidermal cells during wound closure (39). Our data about up-regulation of PKC
/
in ApcMin/+ tumors are not confirmed by Paoni and Leclerc (whereas PKC
/
was not tested by Klein et al.), but they support results obtained from patients and other animal models (21). For PKC
, the previous studies (with the exception of Leclerc) agree with us on a down-regulation of this gene in tumor tissue, which again is consistent with patient data (40) and other animal models (37).
The down-regulation of PKC
and PKC
, the two isoforms selected for further studies, suggested a potential role of these kinases in the molecular events that accompany cell transformation. For PKC
numerous, mostly cell-based reports have been published attributing both tumor-promotive and tumor-suppressive properties to this kinase in colorectal cancer (reviewed in ref. 12). Despite the fact that PKC
could possibly act as a tumor suppressor, two clinical studies using PKC
antisense inhibitors have already been done in human cancer patients (41, 42), without conclusive results. Literature on PKC
in intestinal cancer is still sparse (most likely due to lack of specific antibodies or pharmacologic tools to characterize this enzyme), but PKC
seems to be involved in polyp progression from intestinal myofibroblasts (43) and may control ß-Catenin levels via regulation of GSK-3ß activity (44). To analyze the involvement of these two kinases in intestinal cancer development in vivo, we therefore chose the ApcMin/+ mouse model in combination with our established knockout models of PKC
and PKC
.
In summary, our data suggest that PKC
does not play a role in tumorigenesis in this model. However, the high structural homology and overlapping substrate specificity between PKC
and the other atypical PKC isoform (45) offer the possibility that PKC
/
may in the absence of PKC
take over some of its functions and thereby mask the PKC
-deficient phenotype.
The function of PKC
, on the other hand, seems not to be redundant with other PKCs in this set up because the loss of this enzyme markedly increased tumor numbers at different stages and reduced survival rates in ApcMin/+ mice. This effect was not restricted to certain parts of the intestine but was observed throughout the small intestine and the colorectal track. The increased morbidity in these animals is most likely a result of the more aggressive morphology of the PKC
-deficient tumors. Excessive growth of adenocarcinomas into the peritoneal lumen increases external pressure on the intestinal walls and may thereby affect gut motility and raise the risk of obstructions, the primary cause of morbidity in ApcMin/+ animals.
The accelerated tumor progression observed in PKC
-deficient mice suggests that in these animals, tumor metastasation may be increased as well. In concordance with previous reports (46), we sporadically detected secondary tumors in mammary glands of both genotypes but did not observe an increased risk of metastasation in PKC
-deficient mice. This is most likely a consequence of the reduced life span of these animals, which may normally not suffice to allow the formation of these lesions. Crossbreedings of ApcMin/+ PKC
/ animals with more resistant strains like AKR/J (26) or transplantation of tumors into nude mice could be used to answer the question of metastasation in the PKC
-deficient background.
Strikingly, a deletion of PKC
favors spontaneous polyp formation already in the absence of an APC mutation. Transcriptional profiling revealed that in the PKC
-deficient intestine, expression of the oncogenes Btc and Jun is increased, whereas WNT target genes, like Axin2, are unaffected. On the first view, this was surprising to us. Due to reports that clearly indicate a functional role for classic PKCs in the context of GSK-3ß activity (47), we were expecting to see an alteration in the WNT pathway associated with a destabilization of ß-CATENIN. On the other hand, PKCß has already been identified as a regulator of GSK-3ß activity and its signaling in another colon cancer model (20). Thus, it could well be that PKCß is the classic PKC isoform that regulates, among other kinases, GSK-3ß activity. Nevertheless, we cannot exclude from our data that in the wild-type situation, PKC
is also capable to modulate GSK-3ß activity, but this function might be covered in the deficiency due to redundancy among the PKC family.
PKC
seems to negatively regulate proliferation in the intestinal crypts. Elevated numbers of dividing cells were mostly detected in the epithelial cells of PKC
-deficient mice. However, some of the early-stage lesions detected in the intestinal tract of these animals were originating from the villus stroma. Although the restriction of elevated ERK and EGFR signaling to epithelial cells in the Apc/PKC
double mutant animals indicates that PKC
primarily influences carcinogenesis in this tissue, further studies are needed to clarify its role in other cell types of the intestinal tract.
The EGF family member Btc and Jun are established oncogenes acting via stimulation of cell growth and proliferation (48, 49). Btc was found to be moderately expressed in the intestinal epithelium (50); injection of a synthetic peptide may increase the depth of colonic crypts (51); and its elevated expression is a negative prognostic marker for rectal cancer (52). BTC is able to bind and activate several avian erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homologue (ERBB) type receptors (53), thereby signals via the MAPK cascade (49, 54). JUN is one component of the AP-1 transcriptional activator complex, an important regulator of cell proliferation (55). Strikingly, AP-1 activation is a major target of BTC and ERBB-mediated signal transduction (56). In concordance with this, we detected activation of EGFR after deletion of PKC
in both Apc+/+ and Apc+/min animals. Important factors in these signaling processes are ERK kinases (57), which we found more ubiquitously activated in the intestinal mucosa in the absence of PKC
. The observed negative regulation of ERK1/2 activation by PKC
that we report here is in marked contrast to the ERK-mediated positive influence of this enzyme on apoptosis in the CaCo2 colon tumor cell line (58). This could be attributed to a cell type or species effect, or it may reflect differential functionality of PKC
and ERK signaling during different developmental stages of intestinal epithelial and tumor cells. On the other hand, PKC
has specifically been shown to inhibit ERK signaling in lung fibroblasts (59), in HeLa cells downstream of hepatocyte growth factor/c-MET signaling (60), and after cytochalasin D treatment of embryonal mesenchymal cells (61).
We provide evidence that in the ApcMin/+ mouse model, PKC
deficiencymediated signaling and the WNT pathway synergistically interact in promoting tumor formation and progression despite a direct role of PKC
in APC signal transduction. A likely explanation may be the convergence of both WNT and EGFR pathways on the transcriptional activation on AP-1 target genes like found for Jun and Btc. In this context, recent work by Nateri et al. (62) has shown that WNT-activated TCF-4 and JUN directly interact with ß-CATENIN to activate AP-1 target genes, thus regulating intestinal cancer development in vivo.
PKC
may interfere directly with EGFR signaling via inhibitory pathways. Early work has shown that cPKCs can themselves phosphorylate EGFR at Thr654, thereby decreasing the ligand affinity and signaling capacity of this receptor (6365). Additionally, in a recent report, PKC
has been shown to phosphorylate protein tyrosine phosphatase PTP-1C, which in turn deactivates EGFR and decreases ERK phosphorylation in response to retinoid treatment in breast cancer cells (66). Taken together, these data support our notion that EGFR signaling is altered in the PKC
-deficient intestine.
In conclusion, we report that PKC
and PKC
transcripts are down-regulated in intestinal tumors of ApcMin/+ mice. Deletion of PKC
but not of PKC
promotes tumor formation and progression and reduces survival rates in ApcMin/+ animals. Even in wild-type animals, PKC
deficiency favors spontaneous polyp formation but with a much milder phenotype. Thus, we have shown that PKC
, an originally identified phorbol ester binding protein, acts as a tumor suppressor in the APCMin/+ model. PKC
negatively regulates expression of Btc and Jun and activation of the MAPK cascade. Together, these data suggest that EGFR/PKC
and WNT/APC signaling pathways may converge on the level of transcriptional activation of AP-1 target genes, thereby synergistically promoting intestinal tumorigenesis.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received 2/ 8/06. Revised 4/21/06. Accepted 5/15/06.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Dupasquier, R. Abdel-Samad, R. I. Glazer, P. Bastide, P. Jay, D. Joubert, V. Cavailles, P. Blache, and C. Quittau-Prevostel A new mechanism of SOX9 action to regulate PKC{alpha} expression in the intestine epithelium J. Cell Sci., July 1, 2009; 122(13): 2191 - 2196. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. R. Murray, J. Weems, U. Braun, M. Leitges, and A. P. Fields Protein Kinase C {beta}II and PKC{iota}/{lambda}: Collaborating Partners in Colon Cancer Promotion and Progression Cancer Res., January 15, 2009; 69(2): 656 - 662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ikuta, H. Edamatsu, M. Li, L. Hu, and T. Kataoka Crucial Role of Phospholipase C{varepsilon} in Skin Inflammation Induced by Tumor-Promoting Phorbol Ester Cancer Res., January 1, 2008; 68(1): 64 - 72. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. Lee, Y. Ji, S. Paul, H. Maehr, M. Uskokovic, and N. Suh Activation of Bone Morphogenetic Protein Signaling by a Gemini Vitamin D3 Analogue Is Mediated by Ras/Protein Kinase C{alpha} Cancer Res., December 15, 2007; 67(24): 11840 - 11847. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Fevr, S. Robine, D. Louvard, and J. Huelsken Wnt/{beta}-Catenin Is Essential for Intestinal Homeostasis and Maintenance of Intestinal Stem Cells Mol. Cell. Biol., November 1, 2007; 27(21): 7551 - 7559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Gregorieff and H. Clevers Giving APCmin tumours a SPARC Gut, October 1, 2007; 56(10): 1341 - 1343. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Guan, K. Song, M. A. Pysz, K. J. Curry, A. A. Hizli, D. Danielpour, A. R. Black, and J. D. Black Protein Kinase C-mediated Down-regulation of Cyclin D1 Involves Activation of the Translational Repressor 4E-BP1 via a Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase/Akt-independent, Protein Phosphatase 2A-dependent Mechanism in Intestinal Epithelial Cells J. Biol. Chem., May 11, 2007; 282(19): 14213 - 14225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |