| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Clinical Research |
as a Molecular Target of Resveratrol-Induced Modulation of Polyamine Metabolism
1 First Department of Internal Medicine-ZAFES; 2 Institute of Pharmaceutical Chemistry ZAFES; and 3 Institute of Biochemistry I ZAFES, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Requests for reprints: Jürgen Stein, FEBG, First Department of Internal Medicine-ZAFES, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Phone: 49-69-6301-5917; Fax: 49-69-6301-83112; E-mail: j.stein{at}em.uni-frankfurt.de.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(PPAR
). Cell growth was determined by bromodeoxyuridine incorporation and crystal violet staining. Protein levels were examined by Western blot analysis. Spermine/spermidine acetyltransferase (SSAT) activity was determined by a radiochemical assay. PPAR
liganddependent transcriptional activity was measured by a luciferase assay. A dominant-negative PPAR
mutant was transfected in Caco-2 cells to suppress PPAR
-mediated functions. Resveratrol inhibits cell growth of both Caco-2 and HCT-116 cells in a dose- and time-dependent manner (P < 0.001). In contrast to Caco-2-wild type cells (P < 0.05), resveratrol failed to increase SSAT activity in dominant-negative PPAR
cells. PPAR
involvement was further confirmed via ligand-dependent activation (P < 0.01) as well as by induction of cytokeratin 20 (P < 0.001) after resveratrol treatment. Coincubation with SB203580 abolished SSAT activation significantly in Caco-2 (P < 0.05) and HCT-116 (P < 0.01) cells. The involvement of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) was further confirmed by a resveratrol-mediated phosphorylation of p38 protein in both cell lines. Resveratrol further increased the expression of PPAR
coactivator PGC-1
(P < 0.05) as well as SIRT1 (P < 0.01) in a dose-dependent manner after 24 hours of incubation. Based on our findings, p38 MAPK and transcription factor PPAR
can be considered as molecular targets of resveratrol in the regulation of cell proliferation and SSAT activity, respectively, in a cell culture model of colon cancer. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(14): 7348-54) | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
is expressed at high levels in colonic epithelial cells and colon cancer cells (19). Girnun and Spiegelman (20) hypothesize that PPAR
is exerting its effects early in the carcinogenic process by suppressing tumor formation. Activation of PPAR
therefore could function as an important molecular target of chemopreventive agents such as resveratrol. Recently, Babbar et al. (21) identified two PPAR response elements in the promoter of the spermine/spermidine acetyltransferase (SSAT) gene. Based on our former findings that resveratrol induces cell growth inhibition of colon cancer cells via induction of catabolic enzyme SSAT (13), the aim of this work was to specify the underlying molecular mechanisms and to identify a possible role of transcription factor PPAR
. | Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
SDS-PAGE and Immunoblot Analysis
Caco-2 cells were seeded in 80-cm2 flasks; 24 hours after plating, cells were incubated with substances for different time intervals. Cytosolic and nuclear extracts were obtained according to the instructions of the manufacturer (Active Motif, Rixensart, Belgium). Protein was quantified with the Bio-Rad protein colorimetric assay. After addition of sample buffer to the cellular extract and boiling samples at 95°C for 5 minutes, protein was separated on 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel. Protein was transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane (Schleicher & Schuell, Dassel, Germany) and the membrane was blocked for 1 hour at room temperature with 3% skim milk in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.05% Tween 20 (TBST). Next, blots were washed and incubated overnight at 4°C in TBST containing either 5% bovine serum albumin or 3% milk skim powder with a 1:1,000 or 1:500 dilution of primary antibodies for p38 and phospho-p38 (all from Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA), SIRT1, PGC-1
, and cytokeratin 20 (all from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), and PPAR
(Calbiochem). The horseradish peroxidaseconjugated secondary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was diluted at 1:2,000 and incubated with the membrane for another 30 minutes in skim milk. After chemiluminescence reaction (ECL; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom), bands were detected after exposure to Hyperfilm-MP (Amersham International plc, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom). Blots were reprobed with ß-actin antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). For quantitative analysis, bands were detected and evaluated densitometrically with ProViDoc system (Desaga, Wiesloch, Germany), normalized for ß-actin density.
Cell Counts
Cells were suspended and cultured on 96-well dishes at a density of 104 per well (0.28 cm2). Twenty-four hours after plating, cells were incubated for 24 to 72 hours with substances. At given time points following treatment, cell numbers were assessed by crystal violet staining. Medium was removed from the plates and cells were fixed with 5% formaldehyde for 5 minutes. After washing with PBS, cells were stained with 0.5% crystal violet for 10 minutes, washed again with PBS, and unstained with 33% acetic acid. Absorption, which correlates with the cell number, was measured at 620 nm.
Cell Proliferation
The effects of resveratrol on DNA synthesis of cells were assessed using the cell proliferation ELISA kit (Roche Diagnostics, Tokyo, Japan). This assay is a colorimetric immunoassay for quantification of cell proliferation based on the measurement of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) incorporation during DNA synthesis and is a nonradioactive alternative to the [3H]thymidine incorporation assay. Cells were grown in 96-well culture dishes (104 per well), incubated with resveratrol for different time intervals, and then labeled with BrdUrd for a further 4 hours. Incorporated BrdUrd was measured colorimetrically.
SSAT Enzyme Activity Determination
Cells were washed twice with cold homogenizing buffer [10 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 2.5 mmol/L DTT, 1 mmol/L EDTA], harvested by scraping, disrupted by sonification, and centrifuged at 15,000 x g at 4°C for 15 minutes. The radiochemical assay of the SSAT activity was done by the estimation of labeled N1-acetylspermidine synthesized from [14C]acetyl-CoA (Hartman Analytic, Braunschweig, Germany) and unlabeled spermidine (0.3 µmol/L) as described earlier (13).
Transfection Assay
The following plasmids were used for transfection: pcDNA3 (Invitrogen), as an empty vector for control transfection, and plasmid pcDNA3-PPAR
L468A/E471A, a dominant-negative double mutant, which was kindly provided by V.K. Chatterjee (Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom; ref. 22). These constructs were transfected into subconfluent Caco-2 cells with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). After 6 hours, the cells were fed with fresh medium containing 10% FCS. Twenty-four hours later, the cells were fed with medium containing G418 (400 µg/mL) and culture medium was replaced twice a week. G418-resistant colonies were collected and used for further analysis.
Gal4-PPAR
Transactivation Assay
Plasmids. The Gal4-fusion receptor plasmid pFA-CMV-PPAR
-LBD, containing hinge region and the LBD of PPAR
, was constructed by integrating cDNA fragment obtained from PCR amplification of human monocytes into the SmaI/XbaI (Promega) sites of the pFA-CMV vector (Stratagene). The cDNA fragment contained bps 610-1,518 (NM_015869) of the PPAR
coding sequence. Frame and sequence of the fusion receptors were verified by sequencing. As reporter plasmids, we used pFR-Luc (Stratagene). For normalizing of transfection efficacy, we used pRL-SV40 (Promega).
Transfection. Cos7 cells were seeded at 30,000 per well in a 96-well plate. After 24 hours, transfection was carried out using Lipofectamine 2000 according to the protocol of the manufacturer. Transfection mixes contained 0.8 µL LF2000, 280 ng pFR-Luc, 2 ng pRL-SV40, and 14 ng of the PPAR
fusion receptor plasmid for each well. Four hours after transfection, medium was changed to DMEM without phenol redcontaining 100 units/mL penicillin, 100 µg/mL streptomycin, 2 mmol/L glutamine, 1 mmol/L sodium pyruvate, appropriate concentration of test substance, and 0.1% DMSO, testing each concentration in triplicate wells. Cells were incubated overnight and assayed for reporter gene activity with the Dual-Glo Luciferase Assay system. Luminescence of both luciferases was measured in GENiosPro Luminometer (Tecan). Each assay was repeated at least thrice.
Calculations. Luciferase activity for all assays was corrected by subtracting background activity obtained from nontransfected controls. Relative light units were calculated by dividing firefly light units by renilla light units. Activation factors are gained by dividing mean values of relative light units for each concentration of agonist by mean relative light unit values of the DMSO control. Relative activation is calculated by dividing activation factors by the maximum activation factor. Calculation of EC50 values was done using the four-parameter logistic regression function of SigmaPlot2001 (SPSS, Inc.) using the mean of relative activation for each tested concentration of at least three determinations.
Statistics
The data are expressed as means ± SE of at least three independent experiments. ANOVA was done when more than two groups were compared, and when significant (P < 0.05), multiple comparisons were done with the Turkey test. P < 0.05 was considered to be significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
in resveratrol-induced activation of SSAT. Next, we examined the effects of resveratrol (50-100 µmol/L) on SSAT activity in Caco-2-wild type cells compared with Caco-2-empty vector and Caco-2-dnPPAR
mutant cells to investigate effects mediated by PPAR
. Resveratrol (100 µmol/L) leads to a significant increase of SSAT activity (P < 0.05 versus control) in Caco-2-wild type cells after 24 hours of incubation, which is in agreement with our previous data (13). In Caco-2-empty vector cells, resveratrol (100 µmol/L) also significantly increases SSAT-activity (P < 0.05 versus control) whereas no effects could be observed when PPAR
-mediated functions are suppressed in Caco-2-dnPPAR
mutant cells (Fig. 2
).
|
transcriptional activity. To investigate the effects of resveratrol (50-100 µmol/L) on PPAR
liganddependent activity, we did a chimeric Gal4-PPAR
transactivation assay. Because the chimeric receptor contained only hinge region and ligand binding domain of the PPAR
, any effect of resveratrol affecting kinase-sensitive AF1 domain was ruled out. After incubation with resveratrol (100 µmol/L), we could generate similar effects of PPAR
agonist pioglitazone on PPAR
activity (P < 0.01; Fig. 3A
). To show evidence of resveratrol ability to increase PPAR
activity, we measured, after resveratrol treatment, the expression of cytokeratin 20, which is described to be a specific target gene of PPAR
activity in colorectal cancer cells (23). Incubation with resveratrol (30-100 µmol/L) led to an
40% increase of cytokeratin 20 expression at 100 µmol/L after 72 hours (P < 0.001; Fig. 3B).
|
protein levels. We further did Western blot analysis to determine possible effects of resveratrol on translational level. However, no significant changes in PPAR
protein expression could be detected (data not shown).
Involvement of mitogen-activated protein kinase p38 in resveratrol-induced inhibition of cell proliferation and SSAT activation. There are several lines of evidence that resveratrol mediates its chemopreventive actions via modulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways. To examine p38 MAPKmediated actions, we used the specific inhibitor SB203580. This anti-inflammatory drug inhibits the catalytic activity of p38 MAPK by competitive binding in the ATP pocket (24). As shown in Fig. 4
, incubation with resveratrol (50-200 µmol/L) augmented phosphorylated p38 in a time- and dose-dependent manner, both in Caco-2 and HCT-116 cells (
300% at 200 µmol/L after 16 hours; P < 0.01), whereas p38 MAPK concentration remained unaffected. To characterize the role of p38 activation in resveratrol-mediated induction of SSAT, we pretreated Caco-2 and HCT-116 with p38 inhibitor SB203580 (10-20 µmol/L) for 1 hour and then added resveratrol (100 µmol/L) for another 24 hours. Both in Caco-2-(Fig. 5A
) and HCT-116-cells (Fig. 5B), coincubation with SB203580 significantly diminished resveratrol-induced SSAT activation [P < 0.05 versus resveratrol (100 µmol/L) in Caco-2; P < 0.01 versus resveratrol (100 µmol/L) in HCT-116].
|
|
and SIRT1 expression. Western blot analysis was done to determine possible effects of resveratrol on the expression of PPAR
coactivator 1
and sirtuin homologue SIRT1, which exhibits PPAR
-suppressive effects in white adipocyte tissue. Resveratrol (50-200 µmol/L) led to a significant dose-dependent increase in both PGC-1
(
60% at 200 µmol/L; P < 0.05; Fig. 6A
) and SIRT1 (
140% at 200 µmol/L; P < 0.01; Fig. 6B) expression after 24 hours of incubation.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
seems to play a pivotal role. The plant polyphenol resveratrol (3,4',5-trihydroxystilbene) exhibits multiple chemopreventive effects comprising cell growth inhibition (6, 25), induction of apoptosis (26), and prevention of angiogenesis (27), whereby the underlying molecular mechanisms are only partly understood (28, 29). Intracellular polyamine levels are maintained within very narrow limits because decreases of polyamine concentrations interfere with cell growth whereas an excess seems to be toxic (30). The three key enzymes of polyamine metabolism are ornithine decarboxylase and S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase, the rate-limiting enzymes of polyamine biosynthesis, and SSAT, which controls polyamine catabolism (31). Wolter et al. showed that resveratrol-induced growth arrest of Caco-2 cells is accompanied by inhibition of polyamine biosynthesis as well as activation of polyamine catabolism (13). The peroxisome proliferatoractivated receptor
(PPAR
) is a nuclear receptor that acts as a transcription factor controlling the expression of multiple genes involved in cell growth, differentiation, and apoptosis of several malignant cell lines, and therefore seems to play a crucial role in carcinogenesis (32, 33). To abolish PPAR
-mediated functions, we transfected a dominant-negative mutant in Caco-2 cells. In this PPAR
mutant, two charged amino acid residues (Leu468 and Glu471) in helix 12 of the ligand binding domain are mutated to alanine, whereupon the mutant retains ligand and DNA binding but exhibits markedly reduced transactivation due to impaired coactivator recruitment (22). According to the current findings, an essential role for PPAR
in enhancing SSAT enzyme activity is assumed (21). In fact, we could show that, in contrast to Caco-2-wild type and Caco-2-empty vector cells, resveratrol failed to increase SSAT activity in Caco-2-dnPPAR
cells. The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways have been recognized as a major signaling pathway by which cells transduce extracellular signals into an intracellular response. In several studies, resveratrol was shown to mediate multiple functions by modulating MAPK pathways (26, 34, 35). We could show as well that incubation with resveratrol causes phosphorylation, and thus activation, of p38 MAPK in colon cancer cells. Furthermore, combination of resveratrol with an inhibitor of p38 MAPK leads to an inhibition of resveratrol-induced SSAT activation both in Caco-2 and HCT-116 cells. Consequently, an activation of MAPK cascade by resveratrol can be assumed. As previously described, our results point out an important role of PPAR
in resveratrol-mediated actions whereas resveratrol-dependent PPAR
activation seems to be mediated at least partly by an activation of the ligand binding domain (LBD/AF2) because a Gal4-PPAR
chimeric receptor was activated by resveratrol at a concentration of 100 µmol/L, and this concentration was sufficient to induce SSAT as well. In addition, our results suggest that activation of PPAR
by resveratrol is due to kinase activation, leading to phosphorylation-dependent activation of PPAR
coactivators like PGC-1
(36). Coactivators all interact with a similar surface of the activated ligand binding domain of the receptors and have been suggested to mediate their transcriptional activity (37). It is well established that, in addition to transcription factors, coactivators can also be targets of multiple signal transduction pathways in response to different stimuli (38). Puigserver et al. (39) could show that PGC-1
is activated through p38 MAPK. The mechanism by which p38 activates PGC-1
is not yet clear, but it is suggested that p38 MAPKmediated phosphorylation counteracts repressor effects, possibly by encouraging the release of a repressor from PGC-1
(40). On activation, PGC-1
docks on PPAR
and thus can modulate its transcriptional activity (41). In addition to PGC-1
, resveratrol further leads to an activation of SIRT1, a member of the silent information regulator 2 (Sir2) family of proteins (sirtuins; ref. 42). SIRT1 is mainly linked to negative regulation of gene expression as a cofactor through protein deacetylation (43). However, there is evidence that SIRT1 can act positively and negatively to control gene expression as a cofactor for PGC-1
. These opposite effects could possibly be due to the recruitment of a different set of coactivators and corepressors through PGC-1
/SIRT1 (44). This could further be an explanation for the repressive effects of SIRT1 on PPAR
in white fat where PGC-1
is very low (45). In summary, our data confirm our earlier studies showing that resveratrol-mediated growth inhibition of colorectal cancer cells seems to involve SSAT-induced polyamine catabolism. Here we further show that transcription factor PPAR
acts as a p38-dependent target in resveratrol-induced molecular mechanisms (see Fig. 7
). Besides a decrease in cell proliferation, the observed reduction of BrdUrd incorporation is probably due to an induction of apoptosis, as Wolter et al. (6) showed an obvious increase of caspase-3-activity in resveratrol-treated cells. Recent studies further indicate that the activation of catabolic SSAT is related to an induction of programmed cell death (46). Further projects directing towards these aspects of resveratrol action are going to proceed.
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 8/15/05. Revised 4/ 3/06. Accepted 4/28/06.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
gene. J Biol Chem 1997;272:1877989.
ligands: taking part in chemoprevention. Gastroenterology 2003;124:5647.[CrossRef][Medline]
(PPAR
) mutant is a constitutive repressor and inhibits PPAR
-mediated adipogenesis. J Biol Chem 2000;275:57549.
in colorectal cancer cells. J Biol Chem 2001;276:296817.
ligands induce growth inhibition and apoptosis of human B lymphocytic leukemia. Leuk Res 2004;28:38797.[CrossRef][Medline]
coactivator-1. Mol Cell 2001;8:97182.[CrossRef][Medline]
coactivator 1
(PGC-1
): transcriptional coactivator and metabolic regulator. Endocr Rev 2003;24:7890.
and SIRT1. Nature 2005;434:1138.[CrossRef][Medline]
. Nature 2004;429:7716.[CrossRef][Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Paul, A. M. Rimando, H. J. Lee, Y. Ji, B. S. Reddy, and N. Suh Anti-inflammatory Action of Pterostilbene Is Mediated through the p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathway in Colon Cancer Cells Cancer Prevention Research, July 1, 2009; 2(7): 650 - 657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R Marion-Letellier, P Dechelotte, M Iacucci, and S Ghosh Dietary modulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma Gut, April 1, 2009; 58(4): 586 - 593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kennedy, A. Overman, K. LaPoint, R. Hopkins, T. West, C.-C. Chuang, K. Martinez, D. Bell, and M. McIntosh Conjugated linoleic acid-mediated inflammation and insulin resistance in human adipocytes are attenuated by resveratrol J. Lipid Res., February 1, 2009; 50(2): 225 - 232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Wu and H. Gehring Structural requirements for novel coenzyme-substrate derivatives to inhibit intracellular ornithine decarboxylase and cell proliferation FASEB J, February 1, 2009; 23(2): 565 - 574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Pegg Spermidine/spermine-N1-acetyltransferase: a key metabolic regulator Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, June 1, 2008; 294(6): E995 - E1010. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Qiao and J. Shao SIRT1 Regulates Adiponectin Gene Expression through Foxo1-C/Enhancer-binding Protein {alpha} Transcriptional Complex J. Biol. Chem., December 29, 2006; 281(52): 39915 - 39924. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |