| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Experimental Therapeutics, Molecular Targets, and Chemical Biology |
Departments of 1 Oncology Research, 2 Pathology, 3 Pharmacokinetics and Drug Metabolism, 4 Pharmaceutics, 5 Protein Science, and 6 Small Molecule Chemistry, Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, California
Requests for reprints: Anthony Polverino, Department of Oncology Research, Amgen, Inc., One Amgen Center Drive, MS 14-1-B, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320-1799. Phone: 805-447-3589; Fax: 805-375-8368; E-mail: tonyp{at}amgen.com.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Some of the most potent proangiogenic substances are the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) cytokines. These growth factors bind and activate VEGF receptor (VEGFR) 2 [also referred to as kinase domain receptor (KDR) or, in mice, fetal liver kinase-1 (Flk-1)] and other closely related receptor tyrosine kinases (RTK), including VEGFR1 (also referred to as Flt1), to elicit a stimulatory response in endothelial cells and promote neovascularization (3). Other receptors, such as platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) receptor (PDGFR), are expressed on various cells, including pericytes, and have been shown to regulate pericyte differentiation and vascular survival (4). In addition, stem cell factor (SCF) receptor (Kit) is expressed on mast cells, melanocytes, and some hematopoietic stem cells and has been implicated in the pathogenesis of several tumor types, including gastrointestinal stromal tumors, small cell lung cancer, melanomas, ovarian carcinoma, and breast carcinoma (5). Furthermore, VEGFR3 is expressed exclusively on lymphatic endothelium and, in response to stimulation by its ligand VEGF-C, is thought to drive lymphangiogenesis and regulate metastatic spread (6). Inhibitors of VEGFRs, PDGFR, and/or Kit can potentially inhibit the growth of tumors by either blocking angiogenesis or perturbing dysregulated signaling pathways that cancer cells depend on for survival and growth.
Some small-molecule multikinase inhibitors targeting VEGFRs have shown promising clinical activity against various solid tumors (710), including gastrointestinal stromal (11), melanoma (12), and renal cell (13) tumors. Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody that selectively targets one isoform of VEGF, VEGF-A, was approved as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (10) and has shown activity against nonsmall cell lung cancer (14) and breast cancer (15).
This article describes a new, orally bioavailable, small-molecule multikinase inhibitor, AMG 706. AMG 706 is an ATP-competitive inhibitor of VEGFR1, VEGFR2, and VEGFR3. In addition, AMG 706 inhibits Kit and PDGFR, two RTKs related to VEGFR and implicated in the pathogenesis of several human cancers. AMG 706 inhibits VEGF-induced cellular proliferation and vascular permeability and induces tumor regression in vivo by selectively targeting neovascularization in tumor cells. AMG 706 is currently being studied in clinical trials for the treatment of cancer and has shown antiangiogenic and antitumor activity in a phase I clinical trial in patients with advanced solid malignancies (16, 17).
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Animals for in vivo studies. All in vivo experiments were conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Amgen Animal Care and Use Committee. Female CD-1 nu/nu mice ages 4 to 6 weeks and female Sprague-Dawley rats (Charles River Laboratories, Inc., Wilmington, MA) were housed in sterilized caging. Harlan Teklad (Madison, WI) Sterilizable Rodent Diet 8656 and reverse osmosis water from the Amgen water supply system were supplied ad libitum. Room temperature was maintained between 20°C and 22°C, and relative humidity was maintained between 34% and 73%. The laboratory housing the cages provided a 12-hour light cycle and met all Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care specifications.
Kinase inhibition and cellular assays. In vitro kinase assays were done to establish IC50 values against a variety of recombinant receptor and nonreceptor kinases. Optimal enzyme, ATP, and substrate (gastrin peptide) concentrations were established for each enzyme using homogeneous time-resolved fluorescence (HTRF) assays. AMG 706 was tested in a 10-point dose-response curve for each enzyme using an ATP concentration of two-thirds Km for each. Most assays consisted of enzyme mixed with kinase reaction buffer [20 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 10 mmol/L MgCl2, 5 mmol/L MnCl2, 100 mmol/L NaCl, 1.5 mmol/L EGTA]. A final concentration of 1 mmol/L DTT, 0.2 mmol/L NaVO4, and 20 µg/mL BSA was added before each assay. For Src, a modified kinase reaction buffer was used that included 20 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 2.5 mmol/L MnCl2, 100 mmol/L NaCl, and 1.5 mmol/L EGTA. A final concentration of 1 mmol/L DTT, 0.2 mmol/L NaVO4, and 20 µg/mL BSA was added before each assay. For all assays, 5.75 mg/mL streptavidin-allophycocyanin (ProZyme, San Leandro, CA) and 0.1125 nmol/L Eu-PT66 (Perkin-Elmer Corp., Boston, MA) were added immediately before the HTRF reaction. Plates were incubated for 30 minutes at room temperature and read on a Discovery instrument (Packard Instrument Co., Downers Grove, IL).
HUVEC proliferation assay. HUVECs were cultured in endothelial growth medium-2 (Cambrex, Walkersville, MD). Cells were seeded into flat-bottomed, 96-well plates (BD Falcon, San Jose, CA) at 3,000 per well in DMEM (high glucose) with 10% FBS and penicillin/streptomycin. After culture for 22 hours, medium was removed and cells were preincubated for 2 hours with serial dilutions (1:400) of AMG 706 in DMEM with 10% FBS plus penicillin/streptomycin. HUVECs were then challenged with 50 ng/mL VEGF or 20 ng/mL bFGF and incubated for 72 hours at 37°C, 5% CO2. Cells were washed twice with DPBS, and plates were frozen at 70°C for 24 hours. Proliferation was assessed by the addition of CyQuant dye (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR), and plates were read on a Victor 1420 workstation (Perkin-Elmer Corp., Wellesley, MA). IC50 data were calculated using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm into a four-parameter logistic equation (ID Business Solutions Ltd., Alameda, CA).
PDGF proliferation assay. NHDFs were cultured in fibroblast growth medium-2 (Clonetics). Cells were washed with DPBS, trypsinized, resuspended in DMEM (low glucose) plus 10% FBS plus penicillin/streptomycin, and incubated at 37°C for 22 hours. Cells were serum starved for 72 hours in DMEM plus 0.5% FCS plus penicillin/streptomycin before the addition of AMG 706. After 2 hours, 25 ng/mL PDGF was added and the cells were incubated for an additional 24 hours before the addition of 0.05 µCi/well [14C]thymidine (Amersham, Piscataway, NJ). The amount of radioactivity incorporated into cells was determined following a 24-hour incubation period using a MicroBeta counter (Perkin-Elmer). IC50 data were calculated using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm into a four-parameter logistic equation.
EGF receptor phosphorylation assay. A431 cells were cultured in DMEM (high glucose) plus 10% FBS plus penicillin/streptomycin. Cells were washed with DPBS, trypsinized, seeded into 96-well plates, and incubated at 37°C for 5 hours. Cells were serum starved for 24 hours in DMEM plus penicillin/streptomycin before the addition of AMG 706. After a 2-hour incubation, 50 ng/mL EGF was added and the cells were incubated for an additional 10 minutes. Medium was removed, and the cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS plus 300 µmol/L NaVO4 before incubation with radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer plus 300 µmol/L NaVO4 plus protease inhibitors for 30 minutes at 4°C. Cell lysate was diluted 1:1 with PBS containing 1% BSA plus 0.1% Tween 20 plus 0.2 µg/mL biotinylated anti-EGF receptor (EGFR) antibody (R&D Systems) and 0.2 µg/mL abzyme anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (IGEN International, Gaithersburg, MD). After incubation for 1 hour at room temperature, 2.5 mL of Dynabeads M-280 streptavidin beads (IGEN International) were added and incubated for 30 minutes at room temperature. Samples were read on an IGEN M-Series M8 Analyzer (IGEN International).
Kit phosphorylation assay. MO7e cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 plus 10% FBS plus penicillin/streptomycin/glutamine plus 5 ng/mL GM-CSF. Cells were washed and starved overnight in RPMI 1640 plus 0.1% FBS plus penicillin/streptomycin/glutamine. Cells were washed and seeded into 12-well plates at 2.5 x 106 per well in starvation medium. AMG 706 was added to wells, and after a 2-hour incubation, 100 ng/mL SCF was added and the cells were incubated for an additional 15 minutes. Cells were pelleted and lysed in 150 mmol/L NaCl, 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 1% IGEPAL, 0.5% deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, protease cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich), and 300 µmol/L activated Na3VO4. Kit was immediately immunoprecipitated from supernatants using 5 µg Kit polyclonal antibody (R&D Systems). Samples were loaded onto an 8% Tris-glycine gel and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane (Invitrogen). Membranes were probed with 4G10 anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (Upstate Systems) and then developed using SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL). Membranes were stripped, reprobed using a monoclonal Kit antibody (R&D Systems), and then developed as described. Quantitation was done using the VersaDoc Imaging System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Data were fitted using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm into a four-parameter logistic equation.
In vivo vascular permeability assay. Vascular permeability was induced using a modified Miles assay (19). The gene for murine VEGF was subcloned into a modified mammalian expression vector pCDNA3 (Invitrogen) and transfected into human epithelial kidney (HEK) 293 cells. Cells were selected using G418 (geneticin, Invitrogen), and high expressing cells were identified by ELISA (R&D Systems). VEGF-expressing or vector control HEK 293 cells were cultured in DMEM plus 10% FBS, treated with Versene/PBS 50:50 (Invitrogen), and resuspended in Matrigel (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), and 2 x 105 cells were injected s.c. into the abdomen of female athymic nude mice. Twenty-four hours after implantation of cells, mice were treated with either AMG 706 or vehicle for various periods followed by injection of 0.1 mL of 1% Evans blue dye in 0.9% saline. After 10 minutes, a 1-cm2 piece of skin overlying the Matrigel plug was excised and placed in formamide overnight at 56°C and the extracted Evans blue dye was read on a spectrophotometer at A630. Relative Evans blue units refer to the percentage Evans blue as determined by the standard curve multiplied by 104. Data represent mean ± SE. Statistical analysis was done with one-way ANOVA using StatView software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Bonferroni/Dunn post hoc test was used to determine Ps.
Rat corneal angiogenesis model. Corneal angiogenesis was evaluated in adult female Sprague-Dawley rats as described (20). Briefly, 0.6-mm diameter circular discs of Nylaflo filter paper (Pall Corp., Ann Arbor, MI) were incubated in PBS containing either 0.1% BSA or 0.1% BSA with 10 µmol/L VEGF (R&D Systems) for 1 hour at 4°C. A single disc was inserted into a pocket in the corneal stroma of anesthetized rats. Animals were given vehicle (Ora-Plus) or AMG 706 as indicated via oral gavage. After 7 days of treatment, the corneas were photographed, and for each corneal image, the number of vessels intersecting the midpoint between the disc and the limbus was measured. Image analysis was done in a blinded fashion. Values represent the group mean ± SE. Statistical significance was assessed by ANOVA followed by Fisher's protected least significant difference post hoc test.
Tumor xenograft models. A431 cells were cultured in DMEM (low glucose) with 10% FBS and penicillin/streptomycin/glutamine. Cells were harvested by trypsinization, washed, and adjusted to a concentration of 5 x 107/mL in serum-free medium. Animals were challenged s.c. with 1 x 107 cells in 0.2 mL over the left flank. Approximately 10 days thereafter, mice were randomized based on initial tumor volume measurements and treated with either vehicle (Ora-Plus) or AMG 706. Tumor volumes and body weights were recorded twice weekly and/or on the day of sacrifice. Tumor volume was measured with a Pro-Max electronic digital caliper (Sylvac, Crissier, Switzerland) and calculated using the formula length (mm) x width (mm) x height (mm) and expressed in mm3. Data are expressed as mean ± SE. Repeated measures ANOVA followed by Scheffe post hoc testing for multiple comparisons was used to evaluate the statistical significance of observed differences.
Tumor microvasculature analysis. A431 cells (1 x 107) were injected s.c. into the left flank of female CD-1 nu/numice. Eleven days thereafter, mice were randomized based on initial tumor volume measurements and oral gavage with either vehicle (Ora-Plus) or AMG 706 was initiated. Two hours before harvest, each mouse received an i.p. injection of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) to enable subsequent labeling of S-phase nuclei. Tumors were isolated along with a section of ileum to serve as a positive control for BrdUrd incorporation and fixed in zinc-immunohistochemical solution (21). After 48 hours, the specimens were transferred to 70% ethanol and then processed into paraffin. At selected treatment intervals, sections were evaluated for endothelial cell apoptosis, blood vessel density, and tumor cell apoptosis. Endothelial cell apoptosis was assessed by double immunostaining for CD31 (BD Biosciences) using alkaline phosphatase and for terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferasemediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL; Roche Applied Sciences, Indianapolis, IN) using FITC and counterstained with Hoechst nuclear dye (Molecular Probes). Images from each field were captured thrice using different fluorescent filters to sandwich the images. The newly created sandwiched images allowed the precise identification of both normal and apoptotic endothelial cell nuclei due to the superimposition of the CD31, Hoechst, and TUNEL signals. Blood vessel area was expressed as a percentage of the viable tumor area that was occupied by blood vessels as visualized by CD31 staining. Endothelial cells were immunostained for CD31 using peroxidase localization with 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (DAB) substrate and lightly counterstained with hematoxylin. Tumor cell apoptosis was assessed by the number of apoptotic A431 tumor cells per measured field of nonnecrotic tumor. The tumors were stained for cleaved caspase-3 (Cell Signaling Technologies, Beverly, MA) using peroxidase localization with DAB substrate. Image analysis was done in a blinded fashion. Analyses were done by pair-wise comparison of AMG 706 versus vehicle control for each time point using JMP version 4.0.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). For each dependent variable, Levene's test was used to determine homogeneity of variance, with P < 0.05 indicating that variance was not homogeneous. If Levene's test indicated that variances were homogeneous for each time point being analyzed, then Student's t test was used to compare AMG 706 versus vehicle control groups for that dependent variable at each time point. If Levene's test indicated that variances were not homogeneous for each time point being analyzed, the Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare AMG 706 versus vehicle control groups for that dependent variable at each time point.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
10-fold relative to the VEGFR family (Table 1). The compound is highly selective against a broad range of
47 other kinases tested, including EGFR, Src, and p38 kinase (Table 1).
|
In vivo inhibition of vascular permeability. The effects of AMG 706 were examined in an animal model of VEGF-induced vascular permeability to extend and confirm the results that were observed with enzymatic and cell-based assays. A single 100 mg/kg dose of AMG 706 given 24 hours after injection of VEGF-transfected or vector control cells inhibited VEGF-induced vascular permeability in a time-dependent manner. AMG 706 rapidly and significantly (P = 0.0022) inhibited VEGF-induced vascular permeability (Fig. 2 ). Inhibition of vascular permeability was maintained, although not significantly, for up to 16 hours after administration of AMG 706, an effect that correlates with the maintenance of plasma levels above the calculated HUVEC IC50 value. Inhibition of vascular permeability was rapidly reversed once plasma levels declined below the estimated IC50 value.
|
|
125 mm3. AMG 706 was given orally b.i.d. at 10, 30, or 100 mg/kg/dose. AMG 706 caused a dose-dependent inhibition of tumor growth (Fig. 4A
). In this experiment, tumor growth inhibition was only observed after an initial delay, except in the 100 mg/kg/dose group. Of note, tumor regression was eventually observed in all dose groups. We believe that this effect is due to the period required between the initial destruction of tumor blood vessels and the subsequent destruction of the tumor itself. Statistically significant (P < 0.05) tumor regression was observed at a dose of 100 mg/kg/dose after only 7 days of treatment. With continued treatment, tumors regressed further, with 4 of 10 animals having no measurable tumor mass after 24 days of treatment. Oral administration of AMG 706 at doses of 100 mg/kg/dose b.i.d. for 24 days was well tolerated. To explore the ability of AMG 706 to inhibit the growth of larger tumors, animals previously treated with vehicle were treated with 100 mg/kg/dose b.i.d. on day 27 once the tumors had reached a size of
450 mm3. Treatment of these animals was associated with a very rapid regression of the tumors. Continued treatment was associated with the disappearance of measurable A431 tumors in all the animals.
|
The specific effects of AMG 706 on tumor microvasculature from vehicle-treated and AMG 706treated animals were evaluated using anti-CD31 immunohistochemistry (Fig. 5 ). After 7 days of treatment with 75 mg/kg/dose b.i.d. of AMG 706, there was a distinct absence of blood vessels in tumor tissue as evidenced by the lack of CD31 antibody staining compared with tumor tissue from vehicle-treated mice (Fig. 5A). Only vessels located on the periphery of the tumor were still evident. In addition, as opposed to tissue from vehicle-treated mice, the presence of tumor cell necrosis was seen in the tissue isolated from the AMG 706treated mice.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The in vivo activity of this compound is generally attributable to its broad activity against all VEGFRs tested, including VEGFR1, VEGFR2, and VEGFR3, although we do not know what contribution inhibition of the other targets may play in this response. Although VEGFR2/KDR is presumed to be the dominant receptor mediating the angiogenic activity of VEGF, both VEGFR1 and VEGFR3 have also been implicated. VEGFR1 has been shown to mediate recruitment of endothelial precursor cells to areas of active angiogenesis (3), whereas VEGFR3 plays an important role in lymphangiogenesis. In addition, the stabilization of nascent vessels involves associations with pericytes, a process that involves the PDGFR (5). Modulation of these key mediators should provide more complete inhibition of angiogenesis than the targeting of any single component.
The high selectivity of this molecule is evidenced by the lack of activity against a variety of other kinases tested. Furthermore, no activity against bFGF-induced HUVEC proliferation was observed, implying that AMG 706 does not inhibit the receptor for bFGF nor any downstream kinases or other proteins that mediate the proliferative signals of bFGF. Examination of the physiologic response of established tumors to treatment with AMG 706 provided direct evidence that the mechanism of tumor regression in A431 xenografts is due to the antiangiogenic effects of AMG 706. Increased endothelial cell apoptosis in association with decreased blood vessel area were the first temporal events observed following administration of AMG 706. This was followed by significant increases in tumor cell apoptosis. The sequence of these observations is consistent with targeting of tumor-associated endothelial cells and blood vessels as a primary mechanism of the antitumor activity of AMG 706 in the model systems explored in this study.
In conclusion, we have described the identification of AMG 706 and its characterization as a potent, orally bioavailable, novel multikinase inhibitor. This compound potently inhibited angiogenesis in a variety of in vivo models and was able to induce regressions of large established tumor xenografts. AMG 706 is currently being studied in clinical trials for the treatment of cancer and has shown acceptable safety and promising activity in early clinical trials in patients with advanced solid malignancies (16, 17).
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Pete McDonnell and Efrain Pacheco for excellent technical assistance, colleagues at Amgen, Inc. for producing various reagents, Glenn Begley for critical reading of the article, and Mee Rhan Kim and Michael Petrarca for medical writing support.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received 12/30/05. Revised 4/ 7/06. Accepted 6/23/06.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. A Woyach and M. H Shah New therapeutic advances in the management of progressive thyroid cancer Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2009; 16(3): 715 - 731. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Schlumberger, R. Elisei, L. Bastholt, L. J. Wirth, R. G. Martins, L. D. Locati, B. Jarzab, F. Pacini, C. Daumerie, J.-P. Droz, et al. Phase II Study of Safety and Efficacy of Motesanib in Patients With Progressive or Symptomatic, Advanced or Metastatic Medullary Thyroid Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., August 10, 2009; 27(23): 3794 - 3801. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Li, M. Kuchimanchi, D. Hickman, L. Poppe, M. Hayashi, Y. Zhou, R. Subramanian, G. Kumar, and S. Surapaneni In Vitro Metabolism of the Novel, Highly Selective Oral Angiogenesis Inhibitor Motesanib Diphosphate in Preclinical Species and in Humans Drug Metab. Dispos., July 1, 2009; 37(7): 1378 - 1394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. I. Sherman Advances in Chemotherapy of Differentiated Epithelial and Medullary Thyroid Cancers J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2009; 94(5): 1493 - 1499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Beltran, P. Mitchell, Y.-A Chung, E. Cajulis, J. Lu, B. Belmontes, J. Ho, M. M. Tsai, M. Zhu, S. Vonderfecht, et al. AMG 479, a fully human anti-insulin-like growth factor receptor type I monoclonal antibody, inhibits the growth and survival of pancreatic carcinoma cells Mol. Cancer Ther., May 1, 2009; 8(5): 1095 - 1105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Horn and A. B. Sandler Angiogenesis in the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Proceedings of the ATS, April 15, 2009; 6(2): 206 - 217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Illouz, S. Laboureau-Soares, S. Dubois, V. Rohmer, and P. Rodien Tyrosine kinase inhibitors and modifications of thyroid function tests: a review Eur. J. Endocrinol., March 1, 2009; 160(3): 331 - 336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Coxon, T. Bush, D. Saffran, S. Kaufman, B. Belmontes, K. Rex, P. Hughes, S. Caenepeel, J. B. Rottman, A. Tasker, et al. Broad Antitumor Activity in Breast Cancer Xenografts by Motesanib, a Highly Selective, Oral Inhibitor of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor, and Kit Receptors Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2009; 15(1): 110 - 118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. R. Judson Prognosis, Imatinib Dose, and Benefit of Sunitinib in GIST: Knowing the Genotype J. Clin. Oncol., November 20, 2008; 26(33): 5322 - 5325. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. D. Hu-Lowe, H. Y. Zou, M. L. Grazzini, M. E. Hallin, G. R. Wickman, K. Amundson, J. H. Chen, D. A. Rewolinski, S. Yamazaki, E. Y. Wu, et al. Nonclinical Antiangiogenesis and Antitumor Activities of Axitinib (AG-013736), an Oral, Potent, and Selective Inhibitor of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinases 1, 2, 3 Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2008; 14(22): 7272 - 7283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhang, P. J. Kaplan-Lefko, K. Rex, Y. Yang, J. Moriguchi, T. Osgood, B. Mattson, A. Coxon, M. Reese, T.-S. Kim, et al. Identification of a Novel Recepteur d'Origine Nantais/c-Met Small-Molecule Kinase Inhibitor with Antitumor Activity In vivo Cancer Res., August 15, 2008; 68(16): 6680 - 6687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. I. Sherman, L. J. Wirth, J.-P. Droz, M. Hofmann, L. Bastholt, R. G. Martins, L. Licitra, M. J. Eschenberg, Y.-N. Sun, T. Juan, et al. Motesanib Diphosphate in Progressive Differentiated Thyroid Cancer N. Engl. J. Med., July 3, 2008; 359(1): 31 - 42. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. O. Weinzierl, D. Maurer, F. Altenberend, N. Schneiderhan-Marra, K. Klingel, O. Schoor, D. Wernet, T. Joos, H.-G. Rammensee, and S. Stevanovic A Cryptic Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor T-Cell Epitope: Identification and Characterization by Mass Spectrometry and T-Cell Assays Cancer Res., April 1, 2008; 68(7): 2447 - 2454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. F. Bellon, P. Kaplan-Lefko, Y. Yang, Y. Zhang, J. Moriguchi, K. Rex, C. W. Johnson, P. E. Rose, A. M. Long, A. B. O'Connor, et al. c-Met Inhibitors with Novel Binding Mode Show Activity against Several Hereditary Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma-related Mutations J. Biol. Chem., February 1, 2008; 283(5): 2675 - 2683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Riesco-Eizaguirre and P. Santisteban New insights in thyroid follicular cell biology and its impact in thyroid cancer therapy Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2007; 14(4): 957 - 977. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Verweij and M. de Jonge Multitarget Tyrosine Kinase Inhibition: [And the Winner Is...] J. Clin. Oncol., June 10, 2007; 25(17): 2340 - 2342. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. S. Rosen, R. Kurzrock, M. Mulay, A. Van Vugt, M. Purdom, C. Ng, J. Silverman, A. Koutsoukos, Y.-N. Sun, M. B. Bass, et al. Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of AMG 706, an Oral Multikinase Inhibitor, in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors J. Clin. Oncol., June 10, 2007; 25(17): 2369 - 2376. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |