Cancer Research Versailles No Abst Frontiers in Basic Cancer Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cimino, G.
Right arrow Articles by Nervi, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cimino, G.
Right arrow Articles by Nervi, C.
[Cancer Research 66, 8903-8911, September 1, 2006]
© 2006 American Association for Cancer Research

Clinical Research

Sequential Valproic Acid/All-trans Retinoic Acid Treatment Reprograms Differentiation in Refractory and High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Giuseppe Cimino1, Francesco Lo-Coco3, Susanna Fenu1, Lorena Travaglini2,4, Erica Finolezzi1, Marco Mancini1, Mauro Nanni1, Angela Careddu2, Francesco Fazi2,4, Fabrizio Padula2, Roberto Fiorini2, Maria Antonietta Aloe Spiriti1, Maria Concetta Petti1, Adriano Venditti3, Sergio Amadori3, Franco Mandelli1, Pier Giuseppe Pelicci5 and Clara Nervi2,4

Departments of 1 Cellular Biotechnology and Hematology and 2 Histology and Medical Embryology, University of Rome "La Sapienza"; 3 Department of Biopathology, University of Rome "Tor Vergata"; 4 San Raffaele Bio-medical Park Foundation Rome, Italy and 5 European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy

Requests for reprints: Clara Nervi, Department of Histology and Medical Embryology, University of Rome "La Sapienza" and San Raffaele Bio-medical Park Foundation, Via di Castel Romano 100, 00128 Rome, Italy. Phone: 39-6-80319049/52; Fax: 39-6-80319054; E-mail: clara.nervi{at}uniroma1.it.


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Epigenetic alterations of chromatin due to aberrant histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity and transcriptional silencing of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) pathway are events linked to the pathogenesis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) that can be targeted by specific treatments. A pilot study was carried out in eight refractory or high-risk AML patients not eligible for intensive therapy to assess the biological and therapeutic activities of the HDAC inhibitor valproic acid (VPA) used to remodel chromatin, followed by the addition of ATRA, to activate gene transcription and differentiation in leukemic cells. Hyperacetylation of histones H3 and H4 was detectable at therapeutic VPA serum levels (≥50 µg/mL) in blood mononuclear cells from seven of eight patients. This correlated with myelomonocytic differentiation of leukemic cells as revealed by morphologic, cytochemical, immunophenotypic, and gene expression analyses. Differentiation of the leukemic clone was proven by fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis showing the cytogenetic lesion +8 or 7q– in differentiating cells. Hematologic improvement, according to established criteria for myelodysplastic syndromes, was observed in two cases. Stable disease and disease progression were observed in five and one cases, respectively. In conclusion, VPA-ATRA treatment is well tolerated and induces phenotypic changes of AML blasts through chromatin remodeling. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether VPA-ATRA treatment by reprogramming differentiation of the leukemic clone might improve the response to chemotherapy in leukemia patients. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(17): 8903-11)


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Epigenetic modifications of chromatin plays a critical role in carcinogenesis by causing transcriptional silencing of specific control regions related to cell proliferation/differentiation (1–3). In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), the molecular event underlying the differentiation block and the transforming ability of chromosomal translocation-generated AML fusion proteins [PML/retinoic acid receptor {alpha} (RAR{alpha}), PLZF/RAR{alpha}, and AML1/ETO] seems strictly dependent on the aberrant recruitment of histone deacetylase (HDAC) activities on genes that are relevant to the transformation process and tumor development (1, 3). By changing nucleosomal packaging of DNA, HDACs remodel chromatin in a gene-specific fashion and consequently affect proper cell function, differentiation, and proliferation. In particular, deacetylation of the NH2-terminal tails of histones H3 and H4 by HDACs inhibits transcription, whereas histones H3 and H4 acetylation by histone acetyltransferase (HAT) activities results in transcriptional activation by favoring access of DNA-binding proteins and of the transcriptional apparatus (2, 4, 5).

In acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), the AML-M3 subtype, the formation of RAR{alpha}-fusion proteins induces an aberrant recruitment of protein complexes containing HDAC and DNA methyltransferase activities on the all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) target genes, resulting in their transcriptional silencing (6–13). Moreover, the use of ATRA in PML/RAR{alpha}+ APL represents a paradigmatic example of a highly effective transcriptional/differentiation therapy in leukemias (14, 15). This clinical efficacy of ATRA in APL is due to its ability at pharmacologic doses to release the HDAC repressory complex and to recruit the multisubunit HAT complex on specific ATRA-responsive elements (RARE) present on target gene promoters (6–10). RAREs are present on promoter regions of transcription factors involved in granulocytic myelopoiesis, thus suggesting their crucial role in leukemogenesis (10, 16–18).

In agreement with this hypothesis, we have shown that the ATRA signaling pathway is constitutively repressed through a HDAC-dependent mechanism in non-APL AML subtypes, which are insensitive to retinoids (19, 20). Thus, therapeutic targeting of aberrant HDAC activities might represent a potentially novel treatment strategy in AML.

Several naturally occurring and synthetic HDAC inhibitors (HDACi) have been recently characterized with diverse structures ranging from simple compounds (i.e., butyrates) to more complex agents, such as hydroxamic acids (1, 21). Interestingly, the global chromatin remodeling activity of these inhibitors seems specific, because it affects only few (4-10%) selected genes (1). This specificity and the low in vivo toxicity of these compounds raise the possibility of their clinical use (1, 22).

Valproic acid (VPA) is a well-tolerated and long since used antiepileptic drug. At concentrations equivalent to those used for the treatment of patients with epilepsy (≥50 µg/mL), VPA acts as a powerful HDACi (20). Moreover, VPA is as effective as other HDACi compounds in driving differentiation/apoptosis of AML blasts in vitro and in murine model systems for PML/RAR+ and AML1/ETO+ AML leukemias (20, 23, 24). In vitro, the effect of VPA on terminal myeloid differentiation is increased by ATRA addition in blasts from newly diagnosed and refractory/relapsed AML patients independently from the presence of specific genetic lesions (20). The clinical efficacy of VPA in combination with ATRA in elderly patients with de novo AML and of VPA monotherapy in patients with myelodysplatic syndromes (MDS) have been also recently reported (25–27).

Based on the well-established safe profile of VPA and ATRA treatments in humans, we tested the feasibility and activity of a regimen including the sequential association of these two compounds in a group of patients with high-risk and/or very advanced AML. By an extensive multiparametric approach, we also evaluated in vivo the biological changes induced in the leukemic cells during the first 4 weeks of sequential VPA-ATRA treatment.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients. A pilot study was conducted in eight patients with advanced AML (n = 7) or myeloid blast crisis of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML; n = 1) who received oral VPA and ATRA as compassionate treatment. Written informed consent was obtained before therapy. The diagnosis of AML and the leukemic phenotype was defined according to the French-American-British (FAB) classification and WHO recommendation (28, 29). Eligibility criteria to enter the VPA-ATRA study included (a) performance status ≤2 (according to the WHO scale), (b) adequate renal and hepatic functions (creatinine <1.5 mg%, bilirubin <2 mg/mL, transaminase no more than 2 of normal value), and (c) no clinical evidence of pulmonary leukostasis and/or central nervous system leukemia. Administration of hematopoietic growth factor must have been discontinued 3 weeks before protocol entry and was prohibited while on study.

Genetic characterization. At diagnosis and before entry to the study, all patients had cytogenetic analysis carried out on bone marrow cells after 24 hours of unstimulated culture. GTG bands with tryspin were obtained. Karyotypes were reviewed and defined according to the International System for Cytogenetic Nomenclature (30). Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was carried out before and during VPA-ATRA treatment in bone marrow smears from the two patients whose leukemia blasts carried at diagnosis the +8 and del(7)(q31) aberrations using the method described elsewhere (31). The May-Grünwald-Giemsa-stained smears were analyzed morphologically. Subsequently, FISH analysis was done as described (31). Digitally imaged cells were relocated through the microscope coordinates and documented using the "Easy FISH" system. The cutoff level to exclude false-positive results was calculated on normal bone marrow smears and set at 12% for 7q deletion and 10% for +8 (mean ± 2 SD).

Monitoring of VPA serum levels. VPA serum levels were measured with a fluorescence polarization immunoassay (Abbott, Wiesbaden, Germany) at days 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28 or every time a new drug was introduced in the treatment to evaluate potential pharmacologic interactions. VPA serum concentration was maintained within the therapeutic limits established for the treatment of patients with epilepsy (50-110 µg/mL).

Treatment protocol. The study protocol was approved by the local ethic committees. VPA was given from day 1, at the initial dosage of 10 mg/kg/d p.o. subdivided in three administrations, with dose escalation until optimal serum levels (50-110 µg/mL). ATRA at the dosage of 45 mg/m2 p.o./d, divided in two administrations, was added at the time of therapeutic VPA serum levels or at day 14 of treatment. If neither significant side effects nor progression of disease occurred, treatment was continued. Cytoreduction therapy was started with low-dose chemotherapy to control hyperleukocytosis (WBC > 50 x 109/L) and the potentially related occurrence of an ATRA syndrome until the WBC < 10 x 109/L. Chemotherapy was chosen according to that in use in the two centers participating the study. Hydroxyurea was given daily at a dose of 2 g/m2 in patient 1 starting from days 17 to 24 and in patient 3 at day 28 of VPA-ATRA treatment. Treatment with aracytin 20 mg/m2 twice daily s.c. was initiated in patient 4 at day 24 of VPA-ATRA treatment. Prophylactic RBC were given at hemoglobin levels <8 and 9 g/dL in patients ages <60 and >60 years, respectively. Platelets were transfused below the level of 10 x 109/L.

Response criteria. Therapeutic response was assessed after the first 4 weeks of treatment and graded in line with the criteria standardized by an International Working Group in AML (32). Because these drugs were supposed to induce cell lineage maturation, therapeutic response was also defined according to the International Working Group for Myelodysplastic Syndromes criteria (33). Therefore, hematologic improvement was defined as (a) ≥50% restoration of the deficit in one or more peripheral blood cell lines but insufficient to meet criteria for complete or partial remission and (b) ≥50% decrease in packed RBC or platelet transfusion requirement without a significant change in bone marrow blasts percentage. Progressive disease is worsening of the disease variables evaluated at diagnosis by >25% or comparison of new ones; stable disease is no qualification for hematologic improvement or progressive disease.

Biological studies. Mononuclear cells were isolated at days 0, 7, 14, 21, and 28 of treatment from the bone marrow and/or peripheral blood of patients by Ficoll-Hypaque and evaluated by the following. (a) Morphology in conventional light-field microscopy of Wright-Giemsa-stained smears or cytospins. (b) Cytochemical staining of myeloperoxidase (MPO), cloroacetate esterase (CAE), and {alpha}-naphthyl acetate esterase (ANAE) and ANAE inhibition by NaF according to manufacturer's instructions (Sigma-Aldrich, Milan, Italy). (c) Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis of the cell cycle. For every determination, 2 x 105 mononuclear cells from the bone marrow were resuspended in 50% FCS, fixed in 70% ethanol for 24 hours, incubated with 50 µg/mL propidium iodide (Sigma-Aldrich) and 50 units/mL DNase free RNase A (Sigma-Aldrich), and analyzed after 3 hours (10,000 events) using a Epics XL Cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Milan, Italy). Only one cell population was detectable through scatter properties over the time of treatment in the six cases tested. Apoptosis was quantified by evaluating the sub-G1 fraction of the living cell populations after propidium iodide staining of permeabilized cells. (d) Direct immunofluorescence analysis of cell surface antigens. Two-color flow cytometry analysis was done using FITC-conjugated anti-CD34 and phycoerythrin-conjugated anti-CD117 monoclonal antibodies (Becton Dickinson, Milan, Italy) to determine cell surface markers expressed by immature blasts. Anti-CD15-FITC and anti-CD11b-phycoerythrin monoclonal antibodies (Becton Dickinson) were used for cell surface markers expressed by granulocytic and monocytic cells either alone or combined. A minimum of 50,000 ungated cells for each measurement was acquired by a FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson) using CellFit software (Becton Dickinson). (e) Immunoblot analysis of acetylated histones H3 and H4 were done on mononuclear cell homogenates (30 µg) by using anti-acetylated histones H3 and H4 antibodies (Upstate, Lake Placid, NY) as described (19). Immunoblots were probed with an anti-histone H3 (Upstate) to ensure an equal loading of the samples. (f) RNA Preparation and quantitative real-time PCR analysis. Total RNA was extracted from Ficoll-Hypaque-isolated bone marrow and peripheral blood cells as described (19) and reverse transcribed with random primers and SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD). The cDNA was used for quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) experiments carried out in ABI PRISM 7000 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Gaithersburg, MD). Taqman oligonucleotides (Assay-on-Demand) for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), MPO, colony-stimulating factor 3 (CSFR3 or G-CSFr), colony-stimulating factor 2 receptor (CSF2R or GM-CSFr), and GATA-binding protein 1 (GATA-1) were from Applied Biosystems. {Delta}{Delta}Ct values were normalized with those obtained from the amplification of GAPDH. For the SYBR Green dye detection method, primer sequences were designed using the Primer Express software (Applied Biosystems). Primers were monocyte/macrophage serine esterase-1 (MSE) forward 5'-GAACCACAGAGATGCTGGAGC-3' and reverse 5'-TCCCCGTGGTCTCCTATCAC-3' (34) and GAPDH forward 5'-ATCAGCAATGCCTCCTGCAC-3' and reverse 5'-TGGCATGGACTGTGGTCATG-3'. Reactions were done in triplicates. (g) Chromatin immunoprecipitation. Cross-linking of histones was done in 2 x 106 mononuclear cells from patients and chromatin was immunoprecipitated with an antibody against the acetylated form of histone H4 (Upstate) as described (35, 36). Primers for PCR detection of a genomic region of the RAR{alpha}2 promoter containing the RARE were forward 5'-ACAATGACACAAGCCGGTGTCTCA-3' and reverse 5'-CTCATTTGCCTAATGCAATGCGGC-3'. Twenty-eight to 33 cycles were allowed (36).

Statistics. This pilot study was designed to investigate the feasibility and activity of the sequential association of VPA and ATRA and the biological changes induced in leukemic cells from high-risk and/or very advanced AML. Therefore, a valuable patient was defined as a patient who had completed the 4 weeks of VPA-ATRA treatment and undergone biological testing at defined time points. Only descriptive statistic reported as mean ± SE was applied given the small number of patients under consideration. Student's t test was used to test the probability of significant differences between the mean fold increase detected in samples from all cases. Differences were considered significant if P < 0.05.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Patients. The main clinical characteristics of the AML patients included in this study are shown in Table 1 . Median age was 61.5 years (range, 31-69). Four patients had a history of MDS, three had de novo AMLs (M0-M2) by FAB (28). The remaining patient had myeloid blast crisis of Ph+ CML. Apart from this latter patient, one had normal karyotype, one had a pseudodiploid [der(12)], one had a hyperdiploid (+8) K, and one had a complex K with a del(7)(q31) alteration. In the three remaining cases, the karyotype was not available. Five patients were heavily pretreated and resistant to at least one previous intensive chemotherapy course (range, 1-3; median, 2). The remaining three patients were not eligible for an intensive induction treatment since presented a concomitant active pulmonary infection, hepatocarcinoma, or a severe impairment of cardiac function, respectively. The median of leukemic infiltration was 81.5% (range, 22-95%) and 30% (range, 0-95%) in the bone marrow and peripheral blood, respectively. None of the patients presented hyperleukocytosis (WBC ≥ 20 x 109/L), whereas neutropenia (neutrophils ≤ 0.5 x 109/L) was present in six cases. Two patients had platelet counts >150 x 109/L. In the remaining six cases, the platelets counts were <30 x 109/L. The median hemoglobin level was 8.25 g/dL (range, 7.1-12.8 g/dL).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1. Clinicobiological characteristics of patients at the onset of VPA-ATRA regimen

 
Therapeutic response. An objective clinical response to VPA-ATRA according to the criteria standardized by an International Working Group in AML (32) was not observed in these patients. However, two of eight patients (patients 1 and 4 of Table 2 ) achieved a hematologic improvement as defined by the International Working Group for Myelodysplastic Syndromes criteria (33). These two patients presented MDS-AML and cytogenetic analysis revealed a trisomy of chromosome 8 in patient 1 and a del(7)(q31) deletion in patient 4 (Table 1). Before initiation of VPA-ATRA treatment, both patients had a disease resistant to one and three chemotherapeutic courses, respectively (Table 1). Interestingly, both patients developed a marked increase of the WBC count without signs of encephalic and/or pulmonary leukostasis. WBC reached ≥50 x 109/L at days 17 and 24, respectively (Table 2). This leukocytosis features ~40% maturing myeloid cells and did not involved immature blasts that indeed were decreased (Table 3 ). In patient 1, hyperleukocytosis was controlled by addition of hydroxyurea (2 g/m2/d) from days 17 to 24, whereas patient 4 received low doses of aracytin (20 mg/m2/twice daily) starting at day 24 for 15 days. Patients experienced a rapid reduction of leukocytes maintaining the hematologic improvement in the neutrophil count. In patient 1, VPA-ATRA treatment was withdrawn at day 28 due to a marked increase of the direct bilirubin level to 7.8 mg/dL and resumed at day 43 after normalization of the bilirubin values. Interestingly, a new episode of hyperleukocytosis occurred 14 days after the restarting of treatment that again was characterized by maturing cells with an increased number of neutrophils (data not shown). This patient died at day 70 of septicemia. In patient 4, treatment was continued and reappearance of blasts and disease progression occurred 4 months later. Patient 4 died of his disease at day 184 from the start of the VPA-ATRA protocol.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 2. Patient's response and clinical outcome following the VPA-ATRA differentiating regimen

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 3. Effect of VPA-ATRA treatment on marrow cellularity, WBC counts and morphology of bone marrow and peripheral blood cells

 
Five patients (patients 2, 3, 5, 7, and 8) showed stable disease for a period ranging from 60 to 180 days. Patient 3 experienced hyperleukocytosis at day 22 composed by 40% of monocytic cells that did not reach the morphologic pattern of mature monocytes (Table 3; Fig. 1B ). Therefore, this case did not fit the criteria for hematologic improvement. The CML-blast crisis patient (patient 6) underwent progressive disease (for the persistence of ≥70% of blasts in the bone marrow and the increase of the absolute number of leukemic cells in the peripheral blood), which however was preceded by an increase in the absolute number of monocytes (Table 3), and died at day 148 (Table 2). The hemoglobin levels of patients 1, 3, and 6 remained unchanged compared with the pretreatment values and transfusional support was not required during treatment. As concern to platelet counts, thrombocytopenia consequent to VPA treatment was not observed. Patients 3 and 4 entered the study with a platelet count within the reference range that remained unchanged in both cases. In the other six cases, the VPA-ATRA did not modify their thrombocytopenic condition.


Figure 1
View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 1. Time-dependent induction of AML blasts differentiation: Wright-Giemsa stainings of bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) smears or cytospins from patient 1 (A), patient 3 (B), and patient 4 (C) before (day 0) or at day 28 of VPA-ATRA treatment. Reported in the table are the changes in the percentage of positive cells for MPO, CAE, and ANAE with or without NaF. Stainings were done as described in Materials and Methods. Note that immature blasts, which were predominant before treatment, were induced to differentiate toward the myelomonocytic lineage (patient 1; A), monocytic lineage (patient 3; B), or granulocytic lineage (patient 4; C) by VPA-ATRA treatment as also detailed in Table 3. Arrow, presence of Auer rods in patient 3 maturing cells. E, immunophenotypic changes related to the granulocytic differentiation of leukemic cells (increased expression of CD15 and CD11b, which paralleled the decrease of CD34+/CD117+ cells) were measured in bone marrow cells from patient 4 by flow cytometry at the indicated times of treatment.

 
Patients 2-5 and 8 continued the VPA-ATRA treatment for 50, 102, 60, 94, and 88 days, respectively. Patients 6 and 7 were withdrawn from the study at day 28 for progressive disease and refusal to remain in such experimental approach, respectively. Patients received daunorubicin at the dose of 45 mg/m2 for 3 days. Afterward, all patients died with their disease within 60 to 184 days (median, 119 days).

Adverse effects. Side effects were mild. Only one patient discontinued treatment for a grade III hepatic toxicity characterized by marked increase of the direct bilirubin level to 7.8 mg/dL that normalized at day 43. Hyperleukocytosis was observed in three cases. One patient, who reached serum VPA level up to 100 µg/mL, presented vertigo and tremor that disappeared at the reduction of the VPA dosage.

VPA serum level. Therapeutic VPA serum levels ≥50 µg/mL were reached between 5 and 26 days (median, 8 days) from treatment initiation (Table 2). Seven patients reached this value between 5 and 14 days with a daily VPA doses of 15 to 30 mg/kg (median, 20 mg/kg), whereas in the remaining case (patient 8) the VPA serum level peaked to 60.4 µg/mL later at day 26 using a daily VPA dose of 42 mg/kg (Table 2).

Changes in cell proliferation and differentiation. The biological activity of VPA-ATRA was evaluated in ex vivo samples collected from bone marrow and/or peripheral blood of the eight patients during the first 4 weeks of treatment. Cell cycle analysis was done at days 0, 7, 14, and 21 in bone marrow samples from six of eight patients (patients 5 and 6 were not studied). A consistent increase of the S-G2-M phase and a reduction of the G0-G1 phase was measurable in bone marrow cells from patients in which therapeutic VPA serum levels were reached but not in the "VPA-resistant" patient 8 (Table 2; Supplementary Table S1). Moreover, the frequency of apoptotic cells present in the bone marrow of patient 4 before treatment were greatly reduced by 7 days of VPA treatment. These results were consistent with the hyperleukocytosis detected in three of these patients (patients 1, 3, and 4) and with the absence of myelosuppressive properties of this regimen in the other cases (Table 3). VPA-ATRA treatment induced a gradual decrease in the percentage of bone marrow and peripheral blood blasts and a concomitant increase of cells exhibiting morphologic features of myeloid maturation, including chromatin condensation with nuclear segmentation, decreased nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio, changing in cytosolic basophilia, and appearance of paranuclear Golgi region and specific granules (Fig. 1 for three separate cases). Morphologic changes of bone marrow and peripheral blood cells related to "myelomonocytic differentiation" were observable in patient 1 by day 14 of VPA treatment, 7 days after the inclusion of ATRA (Table 3; Fig. 1A). Cytochemical staining that allows a functional characterization of myeloid-monocytic cells showed that MPO and CAE reactions and staining for NaF-inhibited ANAE activities were increased ~2- to 3-fold in bone marrow cells over the 28 days of VPA-ATRA treatment (Fig. 1A). CAE and MPO are enzymes restricted to the primary granules of granulocytes, whereas ANAE activity is inhibited by NaF only in monocytes.

VPA-ATRA induced cell differentiation toward the "monocytic lineage" in patients 3 and 5 to 7 within 14 to 21 days of treatment as indicated by the specific morphologic changes occurring in bone marrow and peripheral blood cells and the appearance of bone marrow cells in which the ANAE staining was inhibited by NaF (Table 3; Fig. 1B).

Morphologic changes of bone marrow cells relating to "granulocytic" differentiation were present in patients 2 and 4 (Table 3; Fig. 1C). By day 14 of treatment, the percentage of myeloid precursors and neutrophils in the bone marrow or peripheral blood from these two patients were increased ~2- to 3-fold compared with pretreatment values (Table 3). In patient 4 immature bone marrow cells, the MPO reactivity was also induced ~4-fold by day 14 compared with day 0 (Fig. 1D). In this case, the percentage of bone marrow cells positive for the myeloid antigens CD15 and CD11b increased from 41% and 42% to 70% and 85%, respectively. Immature CD34+/CD117+ bone marrow cells decreased from 41% to 12% as measured at days 0 and 28 of treatment, respectively (Fig. 1E).

Cell differentiation remained unchanged in blood samples from the "VPA-resistant" patient 8 who indeed showed ~2-fold increase of CD34+/CD117+ immature cells at day 28 of VPA-ATRA treatment compared with day 0 (Table 3; data not shown).

Induction of histone hyperacetylation in blood cells. Figure 2 shows that at VPA serum levels ≥50 µg/mL, hyperacetylation of histones H3 and H4 was measurable in bone marrow and/or peripheral blood mononuclear cells from seven of eight patients by immunoblot analysis using specific antibodies. At therapeutic VPA serum levels, histone hyperacetylation was also maintained over the time of treatment. Indeed, in patient 1, a drop in VPA serum concentration resulted in a parallel decrease of histone acetylation levels in mononuclear peripheral blood cells (Fig. 2A). These evidence and the unchanged acetylation status of histones H3 and H4 in blood cells from patient 8 (data not shown), in which therapeutic VPA serum levels were not reached before day 26 of treatment, strongly correlated VPA levels with inhibition of HDAC activities in leukemic cells in vivo.


Figure 2
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 2. Changes of VPA serum levels, acetylation status of histones H3 and H4, and expression of genes related to myeloid differentiation over the time of VPA-ATRA treatment. Top, changes in gene expression measured before (day 0) or at the indicated days of treatment in bone marrow and/or peripheral blood samples from patients induced by VPA-ATRA to differentiate toward the myelomonocytic lineage (patient 1; A), granulocytic lineage (patients 2 and 4; B), and monocytic lineage (patient 3 and 5-7; C). Expression levels of genes related to myeloid differentiation (MPO, G-CSFr, GM-CSFr, MSE, and GATA-1) were measured by qRT-PCR analysis on total RNA as detailed in Materials and Methods. Bottom, VPA serum levels (dashed lines) and acetylation status of H3 and H4 histones measured by immunoblot analysis using specific antibodies. Expression of histone H3 was used as a control for histone acetylation levels and sample loading. Arrows, day of ATRA addition to VPA treatment.

 
Changes in myeloid gene expression. The expression levels of genes associated to myelomonocytic differentiation (MPO, GM-CSFr, G-CSFr, and MSE) were also investigated by qRT-PCR over the time of VPA-ATRA treatment in bone marrow and peripheral blood samples from all these patients. Albeit with differences in potency and kinetics among patients, these gene expressions changed in cells from the seven patients in which VPA therapeutic levels were reached and histone hyperacetylation was detectable (Fig. 2; data not shown). Modification in gene expressions also related to the phenotypic cell differentiation into the myelomonocytic (patient 1), granulocytic (patients 2 and 4), and monocytic (patients 3 and 5-7) lineages (Table 3). Compared with pretreatment values (day 0), a strong up-regulation of MPO gene and G-CSFr and GM-CSFr mRNA (~2- to 4-fold) were measurable by day 14 of VPA treatment, 7 days after the addition of ATRA in patient 1 bone marrow and peripheral blood cells (Fig. 2A). In patients 2 and 4, maturation changes of bone marrow cells toward the granulocytic lineage related to the induction in gene transcripts for GM-CSFr, which preceded the increase of MPO mRNA (Fig. 2B). In four patients, monocytic differentiation was consistently associated to the induction of the MSE gene transcripts, which increased ~12-, 23-, 4-, and 17-fold in bone marrow or peripheral blood samples from patients 3 and 5 to 7, respectively, within 14 to 21 days of treatment. In three of these patients, an increased expression of GM-CSFr gene was also measurable over the time of VPA-ATRA treatment (Fig. 2C). GATA-1, which is present either in hematopoietic stem cells or in erythroid and megakaryocytic progenitors was induced ~2- to 4-fold in bone marrow samples from patients 1, 3, and 6 by 14 to 28 days of VPA-ATRA compared with day 0 (Fig. 2).

Therapy-related differentiation of leukemic elements. By parallel analysis of cytology and cytogenetics, we investigated the presence of the trisomy 8 and the del(7)(q31) in maturing bone marrow cells from patients 1 and 4, respectively (Fig. 3A and B ). Reported in the table are the bone marrow cell differentials over time of treatment and respective FISH distribution. Before treatment, both the +8 chromosomal anomaly and the 7q– were mainly present in immature blasts (94% and 51% of the cells from patients 1 and 4, respectively). In both cases, VPA-ATRA treatment decreased the fraction of blasts positive for these cytogenetic anomalies, whereas the percentage of maturing myeloid elements and segmented cells presenting the same anomalies increased. In patient 4, a gradual maturation of the leukemic clone was fully detectable at days 14 and 21 of VPA-ATRA treatment before the initiation of cytoreduction therapy with aracytin to control hyperleukocytosis (day 24). Moreover, morphologic evidence suggesting the ability of VPA-ATRA to induce differentiation of leukemic cells was provided by the appearance of Auer rods in the cytosol of cells from the AML-M0 patient 3 (Fig. 1B, arrow).


Figure 3
View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 3. Genetic and epigenetic evidence of the differentiating effect of VPA-ATRA treatment. May-Grünwald-Giemsa staining (top) and FISH analysis (bottom) at day 28 of VPA-ATRA treatment in bone marrow smears from patient 1 presenting the cytogenetic marker +8 (A) and at days 0, 14, and 21 of VPA-ATRA treatment in bone marrow smears from patient 4 presenting the del(7)(q31) using a chromosome 7 centromeric probe (green signals) and a 7q31 probe (red signal; B). White arrows, +8 abnormality (three green signals) and 7q deletion (one 7q31 red signal) in bone marrow maturing myeloid and erythroid cells (black arrows; B). Reported in the table are the percentages of bone marrow cells valuable for the presence (+) or absence (–) of these chromosomal anomalies at the indicated times of VPA-ATRA treatment (day). Myeloid precursors included promyelocytes, myelocytes, and metamyelocytes; neutrophil included stab cells and segmented neutrophils; monocytic cells included monoblasts and mature monocytes. In all cases, ≥100 cells were counted. Eosinophils (asterisks) were present but not valuable by FISH because of nonspecific signals. C, time-dependent effect of VPA-ATRA treatment on histone H4 hyperacetylation at regulatory chromatin sites on RAR{alpha} gene in patients 4 and 6 mononuclear cells. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay was done using an anti-acetylated histone H4 antibody (H4Ac) or no antibody (no-Ab) and analyzed by PCR as described in Materials and Methods. Amplification of GAPDH was used to detect nonrelevant cellular DNA sequences in the samples. A sample representing 0.02% of total input chromatin was included in the PCR analysis. D, qRT-PCR analysis of relative RAR{alpha} mRNA expression levels over the time of treatment compared with cells isolated before treatment (day 0). The symbols related to the patients numbered as in Table 1. The differences between the mean relative gene expression (horizontal lines) before treatment and at the indicated time points were evaluated by Student's t test (n = 8).

 
In vivo changes of the chromatin state at RAR{alpha} gene promoter. We investigated whether VPA treatment, by inhibiting HDAC activities, affected the chromatin state at ATRA target gene promoters by chromatin immunoprecipitation assay. Chromatin fragments isolated from mononuclear cells of two patients (patients 4 and 6) undergoing treatment were immunoprecipitated with an anti-acetylated H4 antibody. DNA was amplified by PCR using primers located on a promoter region encompassing the RARE of RAR{alpha}2, the ATRA-inducible isoform of RAR{alpha} related to myelomonocytic differentiation (17, 18, 37). The acetylation levels of histone H4 at this RAR{alpha} regulatory site were increased on VPA treatment and further augmented by ATRA addition compared with those measurable in chromatin samples from these two patients at day 0 (Fig. 3C). qRT-PCR done in blood samples from all the eight patients showed a significant increase of RAR{alpha} mRNA expression at day 21 of treatment (n = 8; mean ± SD, 1.4 ± 0.13; P = 0.002) when ATRA was added to VPA in all cases (Fig. 3D). Of note, RAR{alpha} mRNA expression was not changed at any treatment time in bone marrow samples from the "VPA-resistant" patient 8 (Fig. 3D).


   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
We report the results of a pilot study initiated in eight patients with high-risk and/or very advanced AML not eligible for additional intensive chemotherapy in which the HDACi VPA was given to remodel chromatin, followed by the addition of ATRA, to activate gene transcription and differentiation in leukemic cells.

To our knowledge, the present data are the first in vivo evidence showing that achievement of VPA therapeutic serum levels (≥50 µg/mL) correlates with global hyperacetylation of histones H3 and H4 in leukemic blasts and clinicobiological response in AML patients. Moreover, in the only case (patient 8), in which therapeutic VPA serum levels were reached at later times of treatment (day 26), histones remained deacetylated and no response was obtained at the clinical or biological level. By contrast, in the other seven cases, the histone hyperacetylation state was found associated to differentiation of the leukemic clone, albeit to a different extent and with a variable spectrum of phenotypes between patients, as shown by (a) changes in morphology of the blasts, (b) progressive decrease in the percentage of immature cells and concomitant increase of cells presenting specific enzymatic activities or markers of mature granulomonocytic cells, and (c) increased expression of genes related to myelomonocytic differentiation. Thus, the detection of hyperacetylated histones H3 and H4 can be a useful marker to monitor the VPA inhibitory activity on HDACs in bone marrow or peripheral blood cells.

Although a reduction of the peripheral blood and bone marrow blasts was measurable in seven patients within the first 4 weeks of treatment, an objective clinical response to VPA-ATRA was observed in two of eight patients that achieved a hematologic improvement in the neutrophil count. We remark that all our patients were affected by very high risk AML or were chemoresistant and heavily pretreated.

These results compare favorably with those reported by Gore et al. (38) where 2 of 23 pretreated AML patients responded to the structurally related HDACi phenylbutyrate. Compared with phenylbutyrate, VPA is an extremely safe, absorbable, and well tolerated drug. Recently, studies by Kuendgen et al. (26) showed the ability of VPA to induce therapeutic responses in a sizable portion of MDS patients and in one of three patients with AML secondary to MDS. In MDS patients, the simultaneous administration of VPA and ATRA was not superior to VPA alone, whereas addition of ATRA to VPA reinduced a clinical response in two of four MDS patients. A further study by the same group done in 75 patients with MDS and relapsed or refractory AML confirmed these results (27). These latter clinical observations and our findings suggest that the sequential administration of ATRA to VPA synergize AML blast responsiveness.

Although we lack a direct proof for an "epigenetic priming" effect of VPA on gene transcription, in the two cases tested, VPA augmented the histone acetylation status on chromatin regions surrounding the RARE of RAR{alpha}, the ATRA receptor gene involved in normal and pathologic myelopoiesis (16). Thus, VPA alone affected the chromatin status at specific gene target sites that might relate with its ability to induce a certain degree of differentiation in AML blasts in vivo. However, histone acetylation levels at ATRA regulatory sites were further increased by ATRA addition to VPA in samples from these two cases. In agreement with the ligand inducibility of RAR{alpha} gene, RAR{alpha} mRNA transcripts were found significantly induced after the addition of ATRA to VPA (day 21). Therefore, HDAC inhibition by VPA may be needed to relieve transcriptional repression of key pathways of myeloid differentiation in AML blasts. In this respect, Whitman et al. (39) recently reported that the MLL wild-type gene is not expressed in primary AML blast harboring the MLL partial tandem duplication and that the reinduction of wild-type MLL in response to HDAC and/or DNA methyltransferase inhibitors is associated with the restoration of AML sensitivity to cell death.

As for toxicity, the present schedule was safe and well tolerated, with a single case of dose-limiting hyperbilirubinemia occurring in patient 1 at day 28 probably due to an adverse drug interaction. Hyperleukocytosis was observed in three patients. Interestingly, increased WBC number was linked to a decreased percentage of immature cells. Maturation of AML blasts by VPA-ATRA was associated with the recruitment of cells from resting G0-G1 phases into cycling S and G2-M phases, which is in accord with a similar effect reported previously for butyrates in AML blasts in vitro (40). Moreover, genetic evidences obtained by FISH analysis displayed the presence of cytogenetic anomalies in bone marrow maturing myeloid cells, therefore indicating that the differentiating effect of VPA-ATRA occurred in the leukemic clone.

Similar features induced by VPA-ATRA in AML patient blasts (including the increased WBC number, increased percentage of cells in S phase, and terminal differentiation of leukemic blasts with leukemia-specific markers as shown by FISH) were reported previously in ATRA-treated APL patients (14, 41–43). To date, APL represents a paradigm for differentiation therapy of cancer. However, clinical evidence indicate that, in APL, ATRA is per se unable to eradicate the leukemic clone and to cure the disease (10, 14). Chemotherapy following ATRA treatment strikingly improved the prognosis of APL patients and their cure rate to 70% to 80% at 5 years (15).

Thus, we can hypothesize that the efficacy of ATRA-based regimens in APL is due to the epigenetic changes occurring on leukemic progenitors, which render these cells more sensitive to conventional chemotherapy agents. Accordingly, a clinical study done in 242 non-M3 elderly AML patients recently showed that the adjunction of ATRA to chemotherapy significantly improved their clinical outcome compared with chemotherapy alone (44). In this view, the VPA-ATRA combination by inducing an "epigenetic priming" of AML blasts might increase their sensitivity to "standard" chemotherapy or to other novel therapeutic approaches for AMLs.


   Acknowledgments
 
Grant support: Associazione Italiana contro le Leucemie Sezione di Roma, Associazione Italiana per Ricerca sul Cancro, Italian Ministry of Health, National Program on Stem Cells, and Italian Ministry of University and Research (COFIN and FIRB); Fondazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro fellowship (L. Travaglini).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

We thank all the patients and clinicians at the University of Rome "La Sapienza" and "Tor Vergata" for making this study possible and Profs. Giuseppe Avvisati and Francesco Grignani for critical reading of the article and helpful advice.


   Footnotes
 
Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Research Online (http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/).

Received 8/ 2/05. Revised 5/23/06. Accepted 6/19/06.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Johnstone RW, Licht JD. Histone deacetylase inhibitors in cancer therapy: is transcription the primary target? Cancer Cell 2003;4:13–8.[Medline]
  2. Egger G, Liang G, Aparicio A, Jones PA. Epigenetics in human disease and prospects for epigenetic therapy. Nature 2004;429:457–63.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Minucci S, Nervi C, Coco FL, Pelicci PG. Histone deacetylases: a common molecular target for differentiation treatment of acute myeloid leukemias? Oncogene 2001;20:3110–5.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Jaenisch R, Bird A. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nat Genet 2003;33 Suppl:245–54.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Grewal SI, Moazed D. Heterochromatin and epigenetic control of gene expression. Science 2003;301:798–802.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Grignani F, De Matteis S, Nervi C, et al. Fusion proteins of the retinoic acid receptor-{alpha} recruit histone deacetylase in promyelocytic leukaemia. Nature 1998;391:815–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Guidez F, Ivins S, Zhu J, Soderstrom M, Waxman S, Zelent A. Reduced retinoic acid-sensitivities of nuclear receptor corepressor binding to PML- and PLZF-RAR{alpha} underlie molecular pathogenesis and treatment of acute promyelocytic leukemia. Blood 1998;91:2634–42.
  8. He LZ, Guidez F, Tribioli C, et al. Distinct interactions of PML-RAR{alpha} and PLZF-RAR{alpha} with co-repressors determine differential responses to RA in APL. Nat Genet 1998;18:126–35.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Lin RJ, Nagy L, Inoue S, et al. Role of the histone deacetylase complex in acute promyelocytic leukaemia. Nature 1998;391:811–4.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Melnick A, Licht JD. Deconstructing a disease: RAR{alpha}, its fusion partners, and their roles in the pathogenesis of acute promyelocytic leukemia. Blood 1999;93:3167–215.[Free Full Text]
  11. Lin RJ, Evans RM. Acquisition of oncogenic potential by RAR chimeras in acute promyelocytic leukemia through formation of homodimers. Mol Cell 2000;5:821–30.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Minucci S, Maccarana M, Cioce M, et al. Oligomerization of RAR and AML1 transcription factors as a novel mechanism of oncogenic activation. Mol Cell 2000;5:811–20.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Di Croce L, Raker VA, Corsaro M, et al. Methyltransferase recruitment and DNA hypermethylation of target promoters by an oncogenic transcription factor. Science 2002;295:1079–82.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Tallman MS, Nabhan C, Feusner JH, Rowe JM. Acute promyelocytic leukemia: evolving therapeutic strategies. Blood 2002;99:759–67.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Sanz MA, Tallman MS, Lo-Coco F. Tricks of the trade for the appropriate management of newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia. Blood 2005;105:3019–25.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Tenen DG, Hromas R, Licht JD, Zhang DE. Transcription factors, normal myeloid development, and leukemia. Blood 1997;90:489–519.[Free Full Text]
  17. Zhu J, Heyworth CM, Glasow A, et al. Lineage restriction of the RAR{alpha} gene expression in myeloid differentiation. Blood 2001;98:2563–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Glasow A, Prodromou N, Xu K, Von Lindern M, Zelent A. Retinoids and myelomonocytic growth factors cooperatively activate RARA and induce human myeloid leukemia cell differentiation via MAP kinase pathways. Blood 2005;105:341–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Ferrara FF, Fazi F, Bianchini A, et al. Histone deacetylase targeted treatment restores retinoic acid signaling and differentiation in acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Res 2001;61:2–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Gottlicher M, Minucci S, Zhu P, et al. Valproic acid defines a novel class of HDAC inhibitors inducing differentiation of transformed cells. EMBO J 2001;20:6969–78.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Marks PA, Richon VM, Miller T, Kelly WK. Histone deacetylase inhibitors. Adv Cancer Res 2004;91:137–68.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Nervi C, Borello U, Fazi F, Buffa V, Pelicci PG, Cossu G. Inhibition of histone deacetylase activity by trichostatin A modulates gene expression during mouse embryogenesis without apparent toxicity. Cancer Res 2001;61:1247–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Nebbioso A, Clarke N, Voltz E, et al. Tumor-selective action of HDAC inhibitors involves TRAIL induction in acute myeloid leukemia cells. Nat Med 2005;11:77–84.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Insinga A, Monestiroli S, Ronzoni S, et al. Inhibitors of histone deacetylases induce tumor-selective apoptosis through activation of the death receptor pathway. Nat Med 2005;11:71–6.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Raffoux E, Chaibi P, Dombret H, Degos L. Valproic acid and all-trans retinoic acid for the treatment of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica 2005;90:986–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Kuendgen A, Strupp C, Aivado M, et al. Treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes with valproic acid alone or in combination with all-trans retinoic acid. Blood 2004;104:1266–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Kuendgen A, Knipp S, Fox F, et al. Results of a phase 2 study of valproic acid alone or in combination with all-trans retinoic acid in 75 patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Ann Hematol 2005;84 Suppl 13:61–6.[Medline]
  28. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, et al. Proposed revised criteria for the classification of acute myeloid leukemia. A report of the French-American-British Cooperative Group. Ann Intern Med 1985;103:620–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Vardiman JW, Harris NL, Brunning RD. The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of the myeloid neoplasms. Blood 2002;100:2292–302.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Mitelman F. An international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature. Basel (Switzerland): Karger; 1995.
  31. Mancini M, Nanni M, Cedrone M, et al. Combined cytogenetic, FISH and molecular analysis in acute promyelocytic leukemia at diagnosis and in complete remission. Br J Haematol 1995;91:878–84.[Medline]
  32. Cheson BD, Bennett JM, Kopecky KJ, et al. Revised recommendations of the International Working Group for Diagnosis, Standardization of Response Criteria, Treatment Outcomes, and Reporting Standards for Therapeutic Trials in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:4642–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Cheson BD, Bennett JM, Kantarjian H, et al. Report of an International Working Group to standardize response criteria for myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 2000;96:3671–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Zschunke F, Salmassi A, Kreipe H, Buck F, Parwaresch MR, Radzun HJ. cDNA cloning and characterization of human monocyte/macrophage serine esterase-1. Blood 1991;78:506–12.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Fazi F, Travaglini L, Carotti D, et al. Retinoic acid targets DNA-methyltransferases and histone deacetylases during APL blast differentiation in vitro and in vivo. Oncogene 2005;24:1820–30.[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Racanicchi S, Maccherani C, Liberatore C, et al. Targeting fusion protein/corepressor contact restores differentiation response in leukemia cells. EMBO J 2005;24:1232–42.[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Chambon P. A decade of molecular biology of retinoic acid receptors. FASEB J 1996;10:940–54.[Abstract]
  38. Gore SD, Weng LJ, Figg WD, et al. Impact of prolonged infusions of the putative differentiating agent sodium phenylbutyrate on myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemia. Clin Cancer Res 2002;8:963–70.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Whitman SP, Liu S, Vukosavljevic T, et al. The MLL partial tandem duplication: evidence for recessive gain-of-function in acute myeloid leukemia identifies a novel patient subgroup for molecular targeted therapy. Blood 2005;106:345–52.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Digiuseppe JA, Weng LJ, Yu KH, et al. Phenylbutyrate-induced G1 arrest and apoptosis in myeloid leukemia cells: structure-function analysis. Leukemia 1999;13:1243–53.[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Warrell RP, Jr., Frankel SR, Miller WH, Jr., et al. Differentiation therapy of acute promyelocytic leukemia with tretinoin (all-trans-retinoic acid). N Engl J Med 1991;324:1385–93.[Abstract]
  42. Diverio D, Lo Coco F, D'Adamo F, et al. Identification of DNA rearrangements at the retinoic acid receptor-{alpha} (RAR{alpha}) locus in all patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) and mapping of APL breakpoints within the RAR{alpha} second intron. Blood 1992;79:1–5.[Free Full Text]
  43. Castaigne S, Chomienne C, Daniel MT, et al. All-trans retinoic acid as a differentiation therapy for acute promyelocytic leukemia. I. Clinical results. Blood 1990;76:1704–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Schlenk RF, Frohling S, Hartmann F, et al. Phase III study of all-trans retinoic acid in previously untreated patients 61 years or older with acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia 2004;18:1798–803.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BloodHome page
D. Nowak, D. Stewart, and H. P. Koeffler
Differentiation therapy of leukemia: 3 decades of development
Blood, April 16, 2009; 113(16): 3655 - 3665.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
B. Hackanson, H. Becker, T. Berg, M. Binder, C. Dierks, J. Duque-Afonso, M. D. Lairmore, H. S. Schafer, M. Schnitzler, R. Zeiser, et al.
XXIII International Association for Comparative Research on Leukemia and Related Diseases Symposium: from Molecular Pathogenesis to Targeted Therapy in Leukemia and Solid Tumors
Cancer Res., July 15, 2008; 68(14): 5512 - 5518.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Virol.Home page
J. K. Countryman, L. Gradoville, and G. Miller
Histone Hyperacetylation Occurs on Promoters of Lytic Cycle Regulatory Genes in Epstein-Barr Virus-Infected Cell Lines Which Are Refractory to Disruption of Latency by Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors
J. Virol., May 15, 2008; 82(10): 4706 - 4719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BloodHome page
S. Diermayr, H. Himmelreich, B. Durovic, A. Mathys-Schneeberger, U. Siegler, U. Langenkamp, J. Hofsteenge, A. Gratwohl, A. Tichelli, M. Paluszewska, et al.
NKG2D ligand expression in AML increases in response to HDAC inhibitor valproic acid and contributes to allorecognition by NK-cell lines with single KIR-HLA class I specificities
Blood, February 1, 2008; 111(3): 1428 - 1436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BloodHome page
A. O. Soriano, H. Yang, S. Faderl, Z. Estrov, F. Giles, F. Ravandi, J. Cortes, W. G. Wierda, S. Ouzounian, A. Quezada, et al.
Safety and clinical activity of the combination of 5-azacytidine, valproic acid, and all-trans retinoic acid in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome
Blood, October 1, 2007; 110(7): 2302 - 2308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 haematolHome page
T. Siitonen, T. Timonen, E. Juvonen, V. Terava, A. Kutila, T. Honkanen, M. Mikkola, H. Hallman, M. Kauppila, P. Nylanden, et al.
Valproic acid combined with 13-cis retinoic acid and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in the treatment of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes
Haematologica, August 1, 2007; 92(8): 1119 - 1122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BloodHome page
F. Fazi, G. Zardo, V. Gelmetti, L. Travaglini, A. Ciolfi, L. Di Croce, A. Rosa, I. Bozzoni, F. Grignani, F. Lo-Coco, et al.
Heterochromatic gene repression of the retinoic acid pathway in acute myeloid leukemia
Blood, May 15, 2007; 109(10): 4432 - 4440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 haematolHome page
G. Bug, K. Schwarz, C. Schoch, M. Kampfmann, R. Henschler, D. Hoelzer, O. G. Ottmann, and M. Ruthardt
Effect of histone deacetylase inhibitor valproic acid on progenitor cells of acute myeloid leukemia
Haematologica, April 1, 2007; 92(4): 542 - 545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cimino, G.
Right arrow Articles by Nervi, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cimino, G.
Right arrow Articles by Nervi, C.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online