| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Cell, Tumor, and Stem Cell Biology |
1 Program in Gene Function and Expression, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts and 2 Department of Hematology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Requests for reprints: Lucio H. Castilla, Program in Gene Function and Expression, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 364 Plantation Street, LRB/622, Worcester, MA 01605. Phone: 508-856-3281; Fax: 508-856-5460; E-mail: Lucio.Castilla{at}umassmed.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-subunit, encoded by one of three members of the RUNX family (RUNX1, RUNX2, and RUNX3), and a ß-subunit encoded by the CBFB gene that increases DNA-binding affinity to the complex. In hematopoiesis, the CBF heterodimer Cbfß:Runx1 regulates expression of genes with critical functions in differentiation of lymphoid and myeloid lineages. The Cbfß:Runx3 complex is involved in B-cell maturation and the silencing of the CD4 gene during T-cell maturation (2). Studies in the mouse have determined that Cbfb/ and Runx1/ embryos fail to develop embryonic definitive hematopoiesis and die at midgestation (36). This phenotype was rescued in Cbfb/ mice expressing Cbfb from the hematopoietic specific promoters Tie2 or GATA1, further underscoring the key role of Cbfß during hematopoietic differentiation (7, 8). Approximately 12% of AML patients present a chromosome 16 inversion [inv(16); ref. 9] that breaks and joins the first five exons of CBFB with the second half of the smooth muscle myosin heavy chain gene MYH11 (10). The resulting CBFB-MYH11 gene encodes the CBFß-SMMHC fusion protein, which retains the Runx-binding domain from Cbfß and multimerization domain from the myosin sequence. Studies in mice have shown that Cbfß-SMMHC is a dominant inhibitor of CBF function because Cbfb+/MYH11 heterozygous knock-in embryos expressing the fusion protein failed to develop definitive hematopoiesis (11), as was shown for the Cbfb- and Runx1-null embryos (36).
Induction of Cbfß-SMMHC expression or Runx1-loss in adult bone marrow does not seem to affect the maintenance of long-term hematopoietic stem cells (1214). However, Cbfß-SMMHC expression reduces hematopoietic stem cell function by inhibiting multilineage repopulation and creating a myeloid progenitor predisposed to leukemia development (11).
Several lines of evidence suggest that Cbfß-SMMHC may exert an incomplete block of CBF function. First, ectopic expression of the fusion protein in embryonic stem cells expressing one or both copies of Cbfb does not inhibit differentiation in vitro (15). Second, Cbfb+/MYH11 knock-in hematopoietic stem cells expressing Cbfß-SMMHC persist in the bone marrow of the chimeras (16). Third, retroviral insertional mutagenesis in Cbfb+/MYH11 knock-in chimeras identified common insertions in the Runx2 gene (17), suggesting that Cbfß-SMMHC leukemic function is affected by levels of Runx proteins.
In this study, we test the hypothesis that Cbfß modulates the Cbfß-SMMHC effect in adult hematopoiesis and leukemogenesis. We used mice with a Cbfb knock-out allele and a conditional Cbfb-MYH11 knock-in allele to study adult myeloid differentiation and leukemia progression. This study provides evidence that Cbfß modulates hematopoietic differentiation and Cbfß-SMMHCmediated leukemia development, and suggests that CBFß up-regulation may efficiently counteract differentiation defects in human AML with inv(16).
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Molecular and cytology analysis. The Western blot, flow cytometry, and histopathology analyses were done as previously described (12). Fluorescence-activated cell-sorting analysis was done in peripheral blood of leukemic mice using FITC-c-kit and phycoerythrin-lineage antibodies (Lin+: B220, CD3, Gr1, and Mac1; all from BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA).
Colony forming assays. Mice with the genotypes Cbfb+/56M, Cre;Cbfb+/56M, Cbfb-/56M, and Cre;Cbfb-/56M were injected with pIpC at weaning every other day. Two days after the second injection, bone marrow cells were harvested, and 1 x 104 WBC were plated in duplicate in methylcellulose supplemented with cytokines interleukin (IL)-3, IL-6, and stem cell factor and erythropoietin (Methocult-3434, Stem Cell Technologies, Vancouver, Canada) in 35-mm nontreated tissue culture dishes (Corning). The number of myeloid colonies was scored at day 7. Single colonies were harvested and either cytospun for cytology analysis or placed into lysis buffer for PCR analysis.
Statistical considerations. Differences in survival functions between groups were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier product limit survival analysis using the Tarone-Ware test to test the hypothesis of overall equivalence. In the presence of significant overall differences, pairwise comparisons were made between the noncontrol groups using Tarone-Ware tests with a Sidak adjustment to compensate for the additive type I error due to multiple comparisons.
Analysis of human AML samples. Patients had a diagnosis of primary AML, confirmed by cytologic examination of blood and bone marrow. After informed consent, bone marrow aspirates or peripheral blood samples were taken at diagnosis (n = 285) and processed for Affymetrix U133A GeneChip analysis (20). For PCR and sequence analyses, cDNA prepared from 50 ng of RNA was used for all PCR amplifications. The CBFB coding region was sequenced for 27 inv(16)+ AML samples by cDNA amplification using the primers CBFB-FOR 5'-CAGAGAAGCAAGTTCGAGAACG-3' with CBFB-REV 5'-GTTTGAGGTCATCACCACCAC-3' and CBFB-FOR with CBFB6 5'-GTCTTGTTGTCTTCTTGCCAG-3' (25 mmol/L deoxynucleotide triphosphate, 15 pmol primers, 2 mmol/L MgCl2, Taq polymerase and 10x buffer; Invitrogen Life Technologies, Breda, the Netherlands). Cycling conditions for both primer sets consisted of a denaturing cycle for 5 minutes at 94°C followed by 30 cycles for amplification (1 minute 94°C, 1 minute 62°C, 1 minute 72°C), and a final extension cycle for 7 minutes at 72°C. PCR products were purified using the Multiscreen-PCR 96-well system (Millipore, Bedford, MA) followed by direct sequencing with CBFB-FOR, CBFB-REV, and CBFB6 using an ABI-PRISM3100 genetic analyzer (Applied Biosytems, Foster City, CA).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
To test whether the presence of Cbfß has an effect in Cbfß-SMMHCmediated AML, we compared heterozygous restored and hemizygous restored mice after treatment with three doses of pIpC. In the absence of Cbfß, 100% of mice with bone marrow cells expressing Cbfß-SMMHC developed AML with a significant acceleration of disease onset (median latency of 1.5 ± 0.5 months; P < 0.00001; Fig. 3A ). Surprisingly, uninduced Mx1Cre/Cbfb-/56M mice also developed AML with similar latency to that of induced group (Fig. 3A; red dashed line, uninduced; red solid line, induced). It has previously been reported that Cre expression from the Mx1Cre transgene is leaky in mice not treated with pIpC (21). In our study, all AML samples from induced and uninduced groups exhibited deletion of the floxed sequence by PCR analysis (data not shown) and Cbfß-SMMHC expression was detected by Western blot analysis (Fig. 3B). Furthermore, secondary transplantation of Cbfb/MYH11 AML cells derived from induced or uninduced mice produced leukemia in sublethally irradiated recipients with a median latency of 6 weeks (data not shown). These results indicate that Cbfß-SMMHCinduced AML development is accelerated in the absence of Cbfß.
|
The wild-type CBFB allele is not a frequent target of mutations in inv(16) AML. To assess whether CBFB is frequently altered in human CBF AML samples, expression and mutation analyses of CBFB were undertaken. Sequence analysis of the CBFB coding region in a panel of 29 inv(16) AML samples identified no mutations. Expression analysis of CBFB in a panel of 285 human AML samples indicated that inv(16) AML samples had a 40% reduction in CBFB transcript when compared with CD34+ bone marrow cells (relative value, 0.4 ± 0.08), as expected by the expression of one CBFB allele. The CBFB levels in t(8;21) and non-CBF cytogenetic groups were unchanged [t(8;21) relative value, 0.9 ± 0.23; non-CBF relative value, 1.0 ± 0.32]. These results indicate that the remaining CBFB allele is not frequently altered in inv(16) AMLs.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-SMMHC from the Cbfb allele of conditional knock-in mice creates a leukemia precursor that progresses to AML in a multistep process (12). Although the fusion protein is thought to act as a dominant factor in differentiation and transformation (11, 12, 16), the role of Cbfß in Cbfß-SMMHCmediated leukemia is not clear. Here we showed that the capacity of Cbfß-SMMHC to induce AML in mice is modulated by Cbfß. The presence of Cbfß is critical for embryonic definitive hematopoiesis (4) and for in vitro myeloid differentiation from Cbfb/ embryonic stem cells (15). Our study indicates that Cbfß is necessary for in vitro myeloid-erythoid differentiation of bone marrow hematopoietic progenitors. In addition, because colonies were drastically reduced in the absence of Cbfß but not in the presence of Cbfß-SMMHC, our results support the hypothesis that Cbfß-SMMHC may have an incomplete effect in differentiation. As Cbfß and Cbfß-SMMHC compete for binding with Runx proteins in bone marrow cells, basal levels of Cbfß:Runx1 complex in hematopoietic progenitors expressing Cbfß-SMMHC may be critical for proliferation of myeloid progenitors and delayed transformation.
Endogenous expression of Cbfß-SMMHC and Cbfß in bone marrow induces AML with a median latency of 5 months (12). We observed that upon Cre-loxmediated switch from Cbfß to Cbfß-SMMHC expression in progenitor cells lacking a wild-type Cbfb allele, AML latency was shortened to 6 weeks. These results strongly suggest that Cbfß-SMMHC function is enhanced by Cbfß loss. Surprisingly, a similar AML latency was observed between induced and uninduced groups. Probably, a small progenitor population may have undergone Cre/lox deletion due to "leaky" Cre expression from the Mx1Cre transgene (21), and thus becoming a leukemia precursor. Importantly, all AML samples presented Cre-mediated deletion, suggesting that transformation is due to the Cbfß to Cbfß-SMMHC switch. Furthermore, the finding that CBFb is not frequently lost in human AML argues against its role as an inv(16) cooperating tumor suppressor in AML. Rather, our results suggest that increase in the Cbfß-SMMHC-to-Cbfß ratio reduced proliferation of myeloid progenitors while increasing their susceptibility to neoplastic transformation, although the underlying mechanism is unclear. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that Cbfb loss in bone marrow could induce AML. The generation of conditional Cbfb knock-out alleles will provide a critical tool to directly address this possibility using a genetic approach.
Finally, these findings have important implications on the design of targeted therapies. One potential avenue is the identification of drugs that inhibit the fusion protein. Although candidate molecules should act to disrupt Cbfß-SMMHC:Runx1 binding, it will be critical that CBFß:Runx1 binding remains unaltered.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 4/ 6/06. Revised 7/26/06. Accepted 8/28/06.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 (AML1) function in vivo. Cell 1996;87:697708.[CrossRef][Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W.-O. Lui, L. Zeng, V. Rehrmann, S. Deshpande, M. Tretiakova, E. L. Kaplan, I. Leibiger, B. Leibiger, U. Enberg, A. Hoog, et al. CREB3L2-PPAR{gamma} Fusion Mutation Identifies a Thyroid Signaling Pathway Regulated by Intramembrane Proteolysis Cancer Res., September 1, 2008; 68(17): 7156 - 7164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. C. Torchia, K. Boyd, J. E. Rehg, C. Qu, and S. J. Baker EWS/FLI-1 Induces Rapid Onset of Myeloid/Erythroid Leukemia in Mice Mol. Cell. Biol., November 15, 2007; 27(22): 7918 - 7934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |