| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Epidemiology and Prevention |
1 Diet and Cancer Group, Dunn Human Nutrition Unit, Wellcome Trust/Medical Research Council Building, Cambridge, United Kingdom; 2 Pollock and Pool Ltd., Reading, Berkshire, United Kingdom; and 3 Department of Chemistry, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom
Requests for reprints: Sheila A. Bingham, Dunn Human Nutrition Unit, Wellcome Trust/Medical Research Council Building, Cambridge, United Kingdom CB2 2XY. Phone: 44-1223-252760; Fax: 44-1223-252765; E-mail: sab{at}mrc-dunn.cam.ac.uk.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In 1996, we reported that red but not white meat stimulates endogenous intestinal N-nitrosation in humans (4). The influence of red but not white meat on fecal N-nitrosocompounds (NOC) excretion (measured as apparent total NOC, ATNC) has since been shown in >50 healthy volunteers, all of whom were studied in a metabolic suite where diet could be carefully controlled (48). The direction of an increase with increasing red meat is consistent in all individuals and can be attributed to heme iron but not inorganic iron or protein (6). At the higher levels of red meat consumption, concentrations of ATNC are of the same order as the concentration of tobacco-specific NOC in cigarette smoke (4). The majority of NOC investigated are carcinogens, but it has not been established that the NOC formed endogenously in the human gut after eating red meat are genotoxic.
Endogenous N-nitrosation occurs because peptides and amino acids are abundant in the intestine and can be nitrosated to form diazopeptides or N-nitrosopeptides (9, 10). Nitrosating agents, primarily from endogenous nitric oxide (NO) production, are also in abundant supply. O6-methylguanine (O6MeG) is a characteristic promutagenic and toxic adduct formed by many N-methyl-N-nitrosocompounds that either spontaneously decompose or are metabolized to intermediates which are highly reactive methylating agents that react with nucleophilic centers on DNA bases (11). In addition, various nitrosated glycine derivatives react with DNA in vitro to give carboxymethyl adducts [e.g., O6-carboxymethyldeoxyguanosine (O6CMG)] and lesser amounts of methyl adducts (e.g., O6MeG), as shown in Fig. 1. O6CMG has particular potential as a biological marker of DNA carboxymethylation because it does not seem to be repaired by O6-alkylguaninealkyltransferase in in vitro assays (11). Nitrosation of glycine by NO under simulated physiologic conditions results in formation of O6CMG (12).
|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Stools were collected and weighed daily, and radio opaque marker capsules were taken throughout to check compliance and for the measurement of transit time. Stool homogenates were analyzed by thermal energy analysis for ATNC, and results were given as µg/kg or µg/d after correction for daily fecal weight. Further details of techniques used in these feeding studies are reported elsewhere (48). The studies were approved by the Cambridge Research Committee ECS, 00/229, 04/078, 03/322.
Exfoliated cell removal. Fecal samples were excreted into plastic bags suspended on a frame below the toilet seat and immediately placed on ice to cool for 30 minutes to 1 hour according to their size and composition. The sample was weighed and gently bathed in 1 mL/g ice cold dispersing solution (pH 7.4) comprising Eagle's medium, 5% ammonium thioglycolate (mucolytic agent), 3 mmol/L sodium butyrate, 12 mmol/L sodium bicarbonate, bovine serum albumin (10 g/L), penicillin (500 units/L), streptomycin sulfate (500 mg/L), amphotericin B (325 mg/L), and gentamicin (50 mg/L). The stool surface washing was then filtered through 125-µm and 63-µm sieves and centrifuged at 600 rpm for 5 minutes to pellet the heavier material, including exfoliated cells (15).
The cell pellet was resuspended in 15 mL cold dispersing solution, containing 5% ammonium thioglycolate, and 30 µL of FcR blocking reagent (Miltenyi Biotec, Bisley, Surrey, United Kingdom) was added. The filtrate was then mixed by rotation at 4°C for 10 minutes. Following this, 30 µL of MACS immunomagnetic beads (anti-HEA/EpCAM MicroBeads, Miltenyi Biotec) were added to the filtrate, and the tube contents were mixed for a further 20 minutes at 4°C. Bead-cell complexes were magnetically isolated by passing the filtrate through a midiMACS column (Miltenyi Biotec) attached to a strong magnet. Labeled cells remained in the column under the magnetic field and were washed twice with 3 mL PBS. After removal of the column from the magnet, the cells were gently eluted by means of a plunger in 3 mL cold PBS. The cell suspension was spun at 1,000 rpm for 5 minutes (15). In the first protocol, the pellet was resuspended with 3 mL of cold 0.1 mol/L KCl; 1 mL was frozen on dry ice and kept at 70°C for DNA isolation. The remaining 2 mL was equally divided by placing 400 µL onto five polylysine-coated slides. In the second protocol, the pellet was resuspended in 250 µL PBS; 50 µL of the cell suspension was placed onto polylysine-coated microscope slides, air-dried, and fixed using "Surgipath" cytology fixative (Surgipath Europe Ltd., Peterborough, United Kingdom). Slides were stored at 4°C before immunohistochemistry.
Immunohistochemistry of exfoliated cells. The exfoliated cells on slides were fixed in acetone at 4°C for 10 minutes then consecutively incubated with 0.05 mol/L NaOH in 40% ethanol for 5 minutes, 5% acetic acid for 15 seconds, and RNAses A (200 mg/mL) and T1 (50 units/mL) for 1 hour (at 37°C). Incubation with polyclonal O6CMG-specific antibodies produced as earlier reported (refs. 17, 18; 1:1,000) was done overnight at 4°C. Following this stage, the standard protocol for avidin-biotin-peroxidase staining (avidin-biotin complex staining system, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA) and counterstaining with hematoxylin (30 seconds) were applied. Microscopic analysis was carried out at the magnification of x1,000 (15). Exfoliated cells staining positive for O6CMG were counted by visual scanning of the whole area of each smear and expressed as a percentage of the total cell count. In protocol two, all were stained and counted by a histopathologist (T.B.) who was blinded to the dietary period throughout. For the first protocol, one slide was stained for O6CMG and counted by N.B. for all eight subjects. To check repeatability, a second available stored spare slide for five to seven subjects per dietary period was stained by S.T. 1 year later and counted by T.B. who was blinded to the dietary period throughout. For the second protocol, three slides for every sample were counted by T.B., and the average was taken.
Positive control preparation. Positive controls for O6CMG identification were produced by incubating HT-29 cultured cells (American Type Tissue Culture Collection, Rockville, MD) with potassium diazoacetate (PDA; refs. 19, 20). HT-29 cells were seeded onto polylysine-coated slides and allowed to grow for 48 hours in 140-mm Petri dishes containing 50 mL of DMEM supplemented with glutamine (200 mmol/L), penicillin (100 units/L), and 10% fetal bovine serum in a humidified incubator (37°C, 95% O2, 5% CO2). After 48 hours, the medium was removed, and the cells were washed with 50 mL PBS. Medium containing 1 mmol/L PDA was added to the cells, and the cells were incubated for 2 hours. Following incubation, the cells were washed twice with PBS, air-dried, and fixed using "Surgipath" cytology fixative. Untreated cells were used as a negative control. Slides were then stored at 20°C until used for immunohistochemistry as described above.
Rat duodenum. Eight-week-old female Fischer rats were given a single dose (500 mg/kg) of N-acetyl-N'-prolyl-N'-nitrosoglycine (APNG) by gavage. Animals were sacrificed 4 hours after APNG administration. Tissue samples of duodenum were fixed in absolute ethanol and embedded in paraffin. Samples of large bowel or cecal material were not taken. Rehydrated paraffin sections of the rat duodenum were prepared and used for further immunohistochemical procedures as described above.
Analysis of K-ras mutations in exfoliated cell DNA. In the first protocol, DNA was isolated from the 1 mL suspension of exfoliated cells using a Qiagen DNA stool mini kit (Quiagen Ltd., Crawley, United Kingdom) and stored at 80°C before analysis. DNA concentration measured by absorbance at 260 nm/280 nm ranged from 0 to 30 µg per sample. All available samples were amplified using Pyromark K-ras assay primers for codons 12 and 13 (Biotage, Uppsala, Sweden) and 10x PCR buffer, 2 mmol/L MgCl2, 1.5 units Taq Gold (Applied Biosystems, Warrington, United Kingdom), 0.125 mmol/L of each deoxynucleotide triphosphate (Amersham Biosciences, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom), and 10 pmole of each primer. DNA (5 µL) was added to make a final volume of 50 µL. The PCR thermocycling protocol was as follows: 95°C, 5 minutes; (95°C, 15 seconds; 54°C, 15 seconds; 72°C, 30 seconds) x 45; 72°C, 10 minutes. The PCR product was captured on Streptavadin Sepharose High Performance beads (3 µL slurry; Amersham Biosciences), denatured, and washed using the Pyrosequencing Vacuum Prep workstation. The beads were then transferred to a plate containing 40 µL of 0.4 µmol/L sequencing primer, heated to 80°C for 2 minutes for sequencing primer annealing, and allowed to cool to room temperature. The templates were then sequenced using the PSQ 96MA Pyrosequencing System and genotyped using PSQ 96MA 2.1 operating software.
Statistics. Statistical analysis was carried out using Excel for Microsoft Office 2001 and SPSS version 11. In protocol two, three slides of exfoliated cells were counted from at least two samples per dietary period per subject, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was obtained in a two-way, mixed-effect model to assess the reliability of the technique. Mean and SEs and Pearson correlation coefficients are shown for the combined study results. Less than the 0.05 significance level was regarded as significant for paired two-tailed t testing. From previous repeat analyses on subjects on high-meat (420 g) diets, the within-person SD was 56 µg/d, and setting
= 0.05 and ß as 0.2, each study had sufficient power to detect 75 and 65 µg differences in ATNC between dietary periods with 8 to 13 subjects (6).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Figure 2C and D illustrates exfoliated cells staining positive and negative for O6CMG. In protocol one, for the red meat and vegetarian diets, mean percentage positive cells were 59 ± 8 and 14 ± 5, respectively, when prepared by N.B. (high meat versus vegetarian, P < 0.01, paired t test on nine subjects) and 32 ± 7 when prepared by S.T. 1 year later (high meat versus vegetarian, P < 0.03 unpaired t test on six and eight subjects). In protocol two, the mean percentage of exfoliated colonocytes staining positive for the O6CMG adduct on the high meat diet was 56.7 ± 4.8% compared with 23.1 ± 3.5% on the vegetarian diet (P < 0.0001). The level of 45.7± 5.8% on the high-meat, high-fiber diet was not significantly different from the red meat diet (P = 0.054). The intraclass correlation coefficient was highly significant (r = 0.753, P < 0.0001).
When results from all 21 individuals from the two protocols were combined, there remained a highly significant increase in the mean percentage of exfoliated colonocytes staining positive for the O6CMG adduct with red meat consumption compared with the vegetarian diet (55.7 ± 3.3% for the red meat diet, 22.7 ± 2.6% for the vegetarian diet; P < 0.001). Figure 4 shows the levels increased in nearly all the individuals studied.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
However, the dietary determinants of colorectal cancer have been difficult to establish. There is recent compelling epidemiologic evidence that red and processed meat are associated with increased risk, especially in individuals who consume low amounts of fiber (1), but understanding of the reason for these associations is needed before major advances in prevention of this common disease can be made.
Studies of biomarkers that are relevant to colorectal cancer, and which might provide a link between the epidemiology and the physiology of carcinogenesis in humans, are difficult due to the inaccessibility of colon tissue and the fact that there are no blood-borne risk markers in colorectal cancer. Stool DNA is widely used as a source of biomarkers for colorectal cancer detection, but the majority is bacterial DNA and estimates of the amount of human DNA as a proportion of the total vary from 0.01% to <1% (14, 24). Studies of DNA attributed to human colonocytes are likely to provide useful insights into some aspects of nutrition and carcinogenesis in human studies (e.g., methylation and folate metabolism; ref. 24). Extraction of RNA attributed to colonocytes has also been reported (25), but although bacterial and eukaryotic RNA can be distinguished, stool RNA could be contaminated with bovine RNA when high-meat diets are consumed.
Due to these difficulties with conventional stool markers, we have improved original methods for the extraction and histochemical analysis of exfoliated cells from the surface of stools (13, 26, 27). Lower volumes of washing reagents, the use of a pH stable mucolytic agent, smaller MACS microbeads to avoid interference with the visibility of cells, and a blocking agent to minimize nonspecific binding to the exfoliates considerably improved the quality of the extracted material (15). These cells are of epithelial origin, as shown by their morphology (Fig. 2C and D) and immunostaining for epithelium-specific cytokeratin C50. Relatively few cells were viable as judged by testing for trypan blue exclusion (15). There was no positive staining for apoptosis-specific antibody PAR-4 despite the occasional presence of apoptotic colonocytes visualized with picnotic nuclei. Large numbers of apoptotic cells in the colon would not be expected because apoptosis is rapid, with cells being cleared possibly in less than an hour (28). Thus, in the normal colon, only one apoptotic body is seen in every fifth crypt (29).
Using this improved technique, a new screening procedure for colorectal cancer has been proposed based on immunohistochemistry in exfoliated cells for MCM5 marker of proliferation (16). However, the use of exfoliated cells for general population screening is hampered by the short life of exfoliates once excreted. In the present study, all samples were handled within 3 to 5 hours of passing. Numbers of exfoliated cells found were orders of magnitude lower than those reportedly found in early studies of whole stool samples (27). The lining of the gastrointestinal tract is replaced every 2 to 3 days in rodents and other mammals, and the balance of cell loss has been attributed to cell shedding via exfoliation. However, there is little compelling evidence that much exfoliation into the colon occurs (28). Despite being inconspicuous in histologic material, it has been argued that apoptosis and subsequent engulfment by adjacent epithelial cells and macrophages within the crypt is the central feature of the regulation of cell number in the gut (28). There is extensive mixing in the large bowel, and even if large numbers of colonic cells are exfoliated, the majority are likely to be quickly degraded in the proteolytic environment (30). Hence, the cells detected here in fecal washes from the surface of the stool are likely to have been derived from the descending colon and sigmoid junction, where luminal contents are concentrated before stools are passed. To assess the repeatability (and therefore reliability) of the technique, at least two samples per dietary period per person were obtained, and three slides per sample were counted in protocol two, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated as a measure of the between-sample variance compared with the overall variance, including variation from slide to slide. Despite the low numbers of cells present, a highly significant intraclass correlation coefficient (r = 0.797, P < 0.0001) was obtained, indicating high reliability of this technique. Although it is possible that dietary factors would affect exfoliation, we found no evidence that meat or fiber affected total cell counts. However, there was a marked effect of diet on the levels of the O6CMG adduct (P < 0.001). In protocol two, the intraclass correlation for numbers of cells positive for the O6CMG adduct again showed that this procedure was highly reliable (r = 0.753, P < 0.0001). Repeat measures on each sample were not available in protocol one, but when slides from protocol one were restained for the presence of O6CMG 1 year later by a different individual, the same effect of diet was found. Throughout, the histologist counting the slides (T.B.) was kept blind to the dietary period.
Exposure of the colonic mucosa to direct-acting mutagens and protective agents present in the luminal contents is central to current models of the etiology of colorectal cancer, particularly left-sided colon cancer, where stasis of luminal contents and contact with NOC occur (31). It is widely believed that cancers are derived from stem cells located at the bottom of the crypt. Exposure of stem cells to potential direct-acting genotoxins in luminal contents would be unlikely to occur in this case, but it has been proposed that cells on the top surface of the mucosa can be initiated and transformed, allowing "top down" clonal expansion and morphogenesis of colorectal tumors (32). From previous work, we have established that luminal contents of possible genotoxins, in the form of NOC, consistently and predictably increase when individuals are fed red meat, as is shown once more in Fig. 3. The effect of red meat is probably attributable to hemoglobin and myoglobin, which are readily nitrosated to N-nitrosohemoglobin and N-nitrosomyoglobin (33). NO has also been shown to react directly with hemoglobin and myoglobin to produce NOCs (34). More specifically, the reaction of a heme-containing mutant cytochrome c peroxidase with peroxide gave a product capable of oxidizing N-hydroxyguanidine or N
-hydroxyarginine, resulting in the NOC N-nitrosoarginine (35).
However, until now, there has been only circumstantial evidence that the NOCs formed in the large bowel after eating heme from red and processed meat may be important genotoxins. For example, many of the mutations found in colorectal cancer are G-A transitions, characteristic of exposure to alkylating agents, such as NOCs (36). No K-ras mutations were found in the DNA extracted from exfoliated cells obtained from these healthy human volunteers, which is as expected because mutations relevant to colorectal cancer are generally not found in stool screening assays from noncancer cases (37).
The use of adducts as markers for genotoxicity and cancer risk is well established. Selective and targeted benzo(a)pyrene diol epoxide adducts occur at the major p53 mutational hotspots in lung cancer (38), and in a prospective nested case-control study, the presence of the aflatoxin-N7-guanine adduct in 24-hour urine samples conferred a highly significant relative risk of 7.6 (3.2-18.0) for hepatocellular carcinoma (39). Malonaldehyde DNA adducts have been detected in oral mucosa cells (40) and in the colonic mucosa (41). Human colorectal cancer tissue has long been known to contain O6MeG and N7-methylguanine, which arise from exposure to methylating agents, such as some NOCs. N7-methylguanine is nonmutagenic, and O6MeG is repaired by O6-alkylguanine DNA transferase (MGMT) so that K-ras mutations in human colorectal cancer are associated with low activity of MGMT rather than with O6MeG (42, 43). However, O6CMG is not repaired and therefore could be expected to be present in greater quantities in human tissue than O6MeG. Although previously assumed to be nonmutagenic, we have recent in vitro evidence that shows that O6CMG is in fact a potent mutagen producing G-A transitions and G-T transversions in adducted p53 cDNA.4
We established positive controls for the O6CMG adduct measured in exfoliated cells, by incubation of a colon cell line with the direct-acting nitrosated amino acid diazoacetate. In rats treated with APNG, adducted cells were present in the duodenal tissue. APNG has a short half-life of <2 hours and would not have reached the colon when given by gavage. Figure 1B shows that adducted cells were located in situ along the length of the villi; there is thus no evidence that the adducted cells are more likely to be adducted after they have exfoliated.
We attempted to quantitate the levels of O6CMG adducts in the DNA extracted from the exfoliates in protocol one, but levels were below the level of detection and could not be reliably established by the most sensitive method available, the immunoslot blot technique (data not shown; ref. 12). We therefore quantitated our results by standard cell counting techniques, with the histopathologist (T.B.) blinded to the subject and dietary period. Using this technique, we were able to show a significant relation between the percentage of cells staining positive for the O6CMG adduct and the level of ATNC in fecal homogenates (Fig. 5). Furthermore, the percentage of cells staining positive for the adduct significantly increased following the change from vegetarian to a high red meat diet (Fig. 4). Although not as consistently significant, levels on the high-fiber, high-meat diet were intermediate between the vegetarian and high-meat diet. This may account for the effect of fiber in modifying cancer risk from red and processed meat, although other protective effects of fiber are known, such as increased fecal weight leading to increased dilution, butyrate production, and decreased transit time (1, 44).
By using a noninvasive technique in healthy individuals, we have shown the genotoxicity of endogenous NOC formed in the intestine after red meat consumption in humans. The link we have shown here amongst red meat, the endogenous formation of NOC, and the resulting promutagenic adduct in cells exfoliated from the colonic mucosa offers a mechanism underlying the association between red meat consumption and colorectal cancer. Prospective studies of red meat or heme consumption in relation to O6CMG levels and mutation analysis in tumors from patients who later develop colorectal cancer will be needed to corroborate this suggestion.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
We thank Simon Trent, Dr. Anna Bedford, Judith Wills, and Val Church for technical assistance and Dr. Katy Harrison for carrying out the gavage experiments.
| Footnotes |
|---|
4 S. Ponnada et al. O6 carboxymethyl deoxyguanosine: a potent mutagenic adduct characterised using ARMS-PCR assay following site-specific incorporation into a p53 cDNA sequence. 2006, submitted for publication. ![]()
Received 6/24/05. Revised 11/ 2/05. Accepted 11/30/05.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N P Lees, K L Harrison, C N Hall, G P Margison, and A C Povey Human colorectal mucosal O6-alkylguanine DNA-alkyltransferase activity and DNA-N7-methylguanine levels in colorectal adenoma cases and matched referents Gut, March 1, 2007; 56(3): 380 - 384. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. L. Goode, J. D. Potter, W. R. Bamlet, D. N. Rider, and J. Bigler Inherited variation in carcinogen-metabolizing enzymes and risk of colorectal polyps Carcinogenesis, February 1, 2007; 28(2): 328 - 341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Gottschalg, G. B. Scott, P. A. Burns, and D. E.G. Shuker Potassium diazoacetate-induced p53 mutations in vitro in relation to formation of O6-carboxymethyl- and O6-methyl-2'-deoxyguanosine DNA adducts: relevance for gastrointestinal cancer Carcinogenesis, February 1, 2007; 28(2): 356 - 362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Pierre, G. Peiro, S. Tache, A. J. Cross, S. A. Bingham, N. Gasc, G. Gottardi, D. E. Corpet, and F. Gueraud New Marker of Colon Cancer Risk Associated with Heme Intake: 1,4-Dihydroxynonane Mercapturic Acid. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2006; 15(11): 2274 - 2279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |