| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Cell, Tumor, and Stem Cell Biology |
Departments of Pharmacology and Medicine and The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey/Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
Requests for reprints: Jin-Ming Yang and William N. Hait, The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey/Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ 08901. Phone: 732-235-8075; Fax: 732-235-8094; E-mail: jyang{at}umdnj.edu and haitwn{at}umdnj.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The activity of eEF-2 kinase is regulated at several levels. These include activation by Ca2+/calmodulin (2, 4, 5) and by mitogenic growth factors (11, 12). The kinase is inactivated by phosphorylation of Ser366 by S6 kinase and by autophosphorylation (1315). S6 kinase is part of the signaling pathway by which the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) senses nutrient deprivation and regulates autophagy (16). Work by Browne et al. (17) showed that eEF2 kinase could also be directly phosphorylated by insulin-dependent mTOR activity at Ser78, a site adjacent to the calmodulin binding domain. Thus, eEF-2 kinase seems to be regulated by mTOR, providing links to several cellular functions including cell transformation and autophagic degradation.
Autophagy is a highly conserved cellular process for large-scale degradation of proteins and organelles (18). It is activated in yeast in response to nutrient deprivation and is believed to protect cell viability by recycling digested proteins for emergency energy utilization (19). In mammals, autophagy may be essential for surviving under conditions of transient nutrient deprivation (20, 21). Furthermore, withdrawal of growth factors from hematopoietic cells induces autophagy, and this seems to protect cell viability (22). In contrast, under circumstances of severe nutrient depletion, this pathway can result in autophagocytic cell death. Recent studies point to the importance of autophagy in cancer. For example, genetic manipulation of this pathway can increase the appearance of cancer in mice (23); autophagy is regulated by the AKT/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and mTOR pathways (24); and treatment with certain cytotoxic drugs (25) or withdrawal of obligate growth factors may induce autophagic cell death (26).
Several lines of evidence suggest that eEF-2 kinase may be involved in autophagy. First, eEF-2 kinase regulates protein synthesis, a major consumer of cellular energy. Second, eEF-2 kinase lies downstream of mTOR, a known negative regulator of autophagy. Third, growth factor deprivation can markedly reduce the activity of eEF2 kinase. Yet, a role for eEF-2 kinase in autophagy has not been identified. Therefore, in the current study, we investigated the effects of eEF-2 kinase on autophagy in human glioblastoma cell lines. We found that this inhibitor of protein translation can induce autophagy and protect cancer cell viability under conditions of nutrient depletion.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-actin and anti-ß-tubulin antibodies were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). Anti-eEF-2 kinase, anti-phospho-eEF-2 kinase, anti-eEF-2, and anti-phospho-eEF-2 antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technologies (Beverly, MA). Antimicrotubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 (MAP-LC3) antibody was a gift from Dr. Noboru Mizushima (Department of Bioregulation and Metabolism, The Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo, Japan) or purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA). All media and cell culture products were purchased from Life Technologies, Inc. (Grand Island, NY). Chemiluminescence Western blot reagents were purchased from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech (Piscataway, NJ). Cell lines and culture. The human glioblastoma cell lines T98G, U138MG, and LN-229 were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). TJY-V and TJY2-D cell lines were derived by transfecting T98G cells with empty vector or sense DNA for eEF-2 kinase, respectively (27). These cell lines were maintained in Ham's F-10/DMEM (10:1) medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 units/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2/95% air. Mouse embryonic fibroblasts from eEF-2 kinase knockout embryos were provided by Dr. Ryazanov (University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey/Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ).
Small interfering RNA preparation and transfection. The small interfering RNA (siRNA) sequence targeting eEF-2 kinase mRNA corresponded to the coding region 144-164 (5'-AAGCTCGAACCAGAATGTC-3') relative to the start codon. siRNA duplexes were synthesized by Dharmacon Research, Inc. (Lafayette, CO). Cells in exponential phase of growth were plated in six-well plates at 5 x 105 per well, grown for 24 hours, then transfected with siRNA (200 nmol/L) using Oligofectamine and OPTI-MEM I-reduced serum medium according to the protocol of the manufacturer. The concentrations of siRNAs were chosen based on dose-response studies. Silencing effect was examined 72 hours after transfection.
Plasmid construction and transfection. pSUPER.retro.neo+GFP vector was linearized with HindIII and BglII, and the annealed 64-nucleotide oligos (synthesized by Qiagen Operon, Alameda, CA), corresponding to the same coding region as the synthesized eEF-2 kinase siRNA, was ligated into the linearized vector. The resulting positive clones of recombinant expression vector were identified by EcoRI and HindIII digestion. The day before transfection, cells in exponential phase of growth were plated in 35-mm tissue culture dishes at 5 x 105 per dish. The eEF-2 kinase short hairpin RNA (shRNA) expression vector (1 µg/mL) was transfected into T98G cells using Lipofectamine 2000 and OPTI-MEM I-reduced serum medium. Empty pSUPER.retro.neo+GFP vector was used as control. Transfected cells were selected with G418 (800 µg/mL). A fluorescent inverted microscope was used to detect GFP expression of single clones. Western blot analysis was done to determine eEF-2 kinase expression in the selected clones.
Western blot analysis. Cells were washed twice with PBS containing 1 mmol/L phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), scraped off the dishes, and pelleted at 500 x g for 10 minutes. Cell pellets were then lysed in cold lysis buffer [20 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mmol/L NaCl, 1 mmol/L EDTA, 1 mmol/L EGTA, 1% Triton X-100, 2.5 mmol/L sodium pyrophosphate, 1 mmol/L ß-glycerolphosphate, 1 mmol/L Na3VO4, 1 µg/mL leupeptin, and 1 mmol/L PMSF] and sonicated for 5 seconds. The lysates were clarified by centrifugation at 12,000 x g for 30 minutes at 4°C. Identical amounts (50 µg of protein) of cell lysates were resolved by 8% or 15% SDS-PAGE. Transfer of proteins to nitrocellulose was carried out by the method of Towbin et al. (28). Membranes were incubated in blocking solution consisting of 5% powered milk in TBST [10 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 150 mmol/L NaCl, and 0.1% Tween 20] for 1 hour, then immunoblotted with anti-eEF-2 kinase, anti-phospho-eEF-2 kinase, anti-eEF-2, anti-phospho-eEF-2, anti-LC3, anti-ß-actin, or anti-
-tubulin antibodies. Detection by enzyme-linked chemiluminescence was carried out according to the protocol of the manufacturer. Bands were quantified using Scion Image software (Scion Co., Frederick, MD).
Measurement of acidic vesicular organelles. Cells were incubated with 0.5 mg/mL of acridine orange for 15 minutes. Acidic vesicular organelle (AVO) staining was examined using a fluorescence microscope (Nikon ECLIPSE TE200 microscope, Nikon, Inc., Melville, NY). To quantify AVOs, the stained cells were detached by trypsinization and the intensity of red fluorescence from 104 cells was measured by FACSCalibur using CellQuest software (Becton Dickinson, Bedford, MA).
Electron microscopy. Cells were harvested by trypsinization, fixed in 2.5% gluteraldehyde/4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 mol/L cacodylate buffer, then post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide buffer. After dehydration in a graded series of acetone, the cells were embedded in spur resin. Thin sections (90 nm) were cut on a Reichert Ultracut E microtome. Sectioned grids were stained with saturated solution of uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Sections were examined at 80 kV with a JEOL 1200EX transmission electron microscope.
Cellular viability. For MTT assay, cells were plated at 5 x 103 per well in 96-well tissue culture plates and incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2/95% air. Cell viability was measured by MTT assay after 1 to 7 days of incubation. The formazan product, formed after a 4-hour incubation with MTT, was dissolved in DMSO and read at 570 nm using a VERSAmax microplate reader (Molecular Devices Corp., Sunnyvale, CA).
For trypan blue exclusion assay, cells were plated at 2.5 x 104 per well in 24-well tissue culture plates. Viable cells were counted using a Vi-CELL Cell Viability Analyzer (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Miami, FL).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Silencing of eEF-2 kinase expression decreases autophagy. Microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3) is a human homologue of the yeast ATG8, an essential autophagy protein. It is processed from a full-length protein (MAP-LC3-I) to a cleaved and lipidated form (LC3-II) during autophagy. The abundance of MAP-LC3-II reflects the level of autophagy and LC3-II has been used as a specific marker for autophagy (29). To determine whether eEF-2 kinase plays a role in autophagic cellular degradation, we compared the formation of LC3-II in glioblastoma cells with or without silencing of eEF-2 kinase expression. As shown in Fig. 2 , silencing of eEF-2 kinase decreased the appearance of LC3-II in T98G and U138MG cells grown to high cell density to stimulate autophagy (90% confluence) in comparison with cells treated with scrambled siRNA (Fig. 2A). Similarly, the production of LC3-II was markedly reduced in T98GeEF2K() cells compared with that of empty vector controls (Fig. 2B). The effect of eEF-2 kinase on autophagy was also observed in the human glioma cell line LN-229, human breast cancer cell line MCF-7, and mouse embryonic fibroblasts from eEF-2 kinase knockout embryos (Fig. 2C and D).
|
|
|
Silencing of eEF-2 kinase expression blunts the autophagocytic response to nutrient deprivation. Because nutrient deprivation induces autophagy in several well-described systems (19, 31), we investigated the effects of eEF2 kinase depletion on the induction of autophagy following nutrient removal. Because cell confluence affects the amount of LC3-II formation (Fig. 5A ), T98G cells were grown at low cell density (20-30% confluence) in fully supplemented medium for 24 hours, at which time the medium was replaced with PBS, and then incubated for 30 to 60 minutes. Figure 5B shows that nutrient deprivation increased autophagy in parental and empty vector controls as measured by the increase of LC3-II. In contrast, the appearance of LC3-II was markedly reduced in the T98GeEF2K() cells. LC3-II levels were 6- and 3-fold lower in T98GeEF2K() than in T98GV cells at 30 and 60 minutes after nutrient deprivation, respectively (Fig. 5B). In similar experiments done in LN-229 glioblastoma cells, we found that siRNA to eEF-2 kinase completely blocked the autophagic response to nutrient deprivation (Fig. 5C).
|
The activity of eEF-2 kinase can be regulated by phosphorylation on Ser366 by S6 kinase (13). In response to nutrient deprivation, the activity of S6 kinase is decreased by inactivation of mTOR (32). Therefore, we asked whether the increased eEF-2 kinase activity seen with nutrient deprivation was due to inactivation of S6 kinase. As shown in Fig. 5E, nutrient removal led to the rapid loss of phosphorylated S6 kinase from all the three cell lines without a change in the expression of S6 kinase. A similar observation was obtained in the LN-229 cell line (Fig. 5F).
eEF-2 kinase protects cell viability under conditions of nutrient deprivation. Autophagy can protect cells from nutrient and growth factor deprivation (18, 22). Therefore, we determined the effects of eEF-2 kinase on cancer cell viability under conditions shown to activate autophagy. T98GeEF2K() and T98GV cells were incubated in medium with or without serum and cell viability measured by the MTT (Fig. 6A and B ) and trypan blue exclusion (Fig. 6C and D) assays. Figure 6A and C shows that the viability of T98GeEF2K() cells in serum-free medium was significantly lower than that observed in T98GV cells (P < 0.01). In contrast, the viability of T98GeEF2K() cells maintained in serum-containing medium was similar to that of controls (Fig. 6B and D).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We identified eEF-2 kinase in glioblastoma as a Ca2+/calmodulindependent protein kinase (5, 6). Subsequently, we (35) and others (1, 36) reported the unique features of this enzyme, including the presence of an unusual catalytic domain and its total dependence on calmodulin for activity. Several laboratories, including our own, showed that the activity of the kinase was exquisitely sensitive to growth factor stimulation (8, 11, 12) and nutrient deprivation (6).
To begin to understand the role of eEF2 kinase in autophagy, we used RNA interference to silence eEF-2 kinase expression in human glioblastoma cells, derived stable eEF-2 kinasedepleted clones, and measured the effects on several variables of autophagy. In support of the hypothesis that eEF-2 kinase is involved in autophagy, we found that silencing eEF-2 kinase activity in glioblastoma cell lines reduces autophagy as measured by three methods: LC3-II production (Fig. 2), AVO formation (Fig. 3), and appearance of multilamellar autophagosomes (Fig. 4). In contrast, overexpression of the kinase increased autophagy in isogenic glioblastoma cell lines (Fig. 3D-F). The level of LC3-II (expressed as a ratio to actin), not the ratio to LC3-I, is the standard method for measuring autophagy. Nonetheless, we did not view this single measurement as sufficient and, therefore, also measured autophagy by AVO formation (Fig. 3) and by electron microscopy (Fig. 4). Thus, it is possible that eEF-2 kinase depletion may also affect LC3-I levels; however, the use of complementary methods to assay autophagy, which yielded the same results, indicates that any effect that eEF-2 kinase had on LC3-I would be in addition to the effect of eEF-2 kinase on autophagy.
To determine the effect of nutrient deprivation on the induction of autophagy, we chose conditions of low cell density (20-30% confluence)/low basal autophagy. Nutrient deprivation increases the expression and activity of eEF-2 kinase (Fig. 5D and F) and suppresses the activity of S6 kinase (Fig. 5E and F). In the absence of inducible eEF-2 kinase, S6 kinase remains repressed but the autophagocytic response to nutrient deprivation is blunted (Fig. 5B and C). These data confirm the location of eEF-2 kinase downstream of S6 kinase (13) and show the essential role of eEF-2 kinase in the autophagocytic response. The differences in the baseline degree of autophagy in T98G cells seen in Figs. 2 and 5 are explained by cell density. We found that the degree of autophagy increases with cell density (Fig. 5A). In Fig. 2, to study the effect of eEF-2K depletion on cells undergoing autophagy, we grew cells to high density (90% confluence)/high basal autophagy. In Fig. 5, to study the effect of nutrient deprivation on the induction of autophagy, we chose conditions of low cell density (20-30% confluence)/low basal autophagy. Therefore, the differences in autophagy based on cell density readily explain the baseline differences between the T98G controls in these figures and were not a consequence of transfection or infection.
Consistent with the concept that cells can use autophagy to protect against transient nutrient deprivation (22, 26, 33), we found that blunting autophagy through depletion of eEF-2 kinase has deleterious effects on cell viability. The data in Fig. 6 show that cells with an incapacitated autophagocytic response, due to depletion of eEF-2 kinase, cannot survive even transiently without nutrients whereas the control cell line can actually proliferate and remain viable for up to 5 days. Others have reported similar dependence on autophagy for cell survival under nutrient-depleted conditions. For example, Lum et al. (22) found that removal of an obligate growth factor (interleukin-3) from hematopoietic precursors triggered autophagy and promoted cell survival through reutilization of cellular components to generate energy.
These results allow a more detailed understanding of how nutrient deprivation may link inhibition of protein synthesis to autophagy. In this model, the presence of nutrients activates mTOR, mTOR phosphorylates and activates S6 kinase, and both mTOR and S6 kinase phosphorylate and inhibit eEF2 kinase, thereby promoting protein synthesis. In contrast, in the absence of adequate nutrients, inhibition of mTOR results in the dephosphorylation and inhibition of S6 kinase, thereby relieving the inhibition of eEF-2 kinase, which in turn inhibits protein synthesis and conserves cellular energy. Under conditions of nutrient stress, the cell has acquired a mechanism to link conservation of energy (i.e., via inhibition of protein synthesis) to replenishment of energy supplies by digesting cellular organelles through activation of autophagy.
In summary, the results of our experiments show for the first time that eEF-2 kinase can play a role in autophagy in cancer cells and that increased expression of this kinase may provide a mechanism for survival of glioblastoma cells under conditions of cellular stress and, thus, may help explain why the activity of this kinase is increased in most human malignancies.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 5/ 5/05. Revised 11/28/05. Accepted 1/13/06.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. White and R. S. DiPaola The Double-Edged Sword of Autophagy Modulation in Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., September 1, 2009; 15(17): 5308 - 5316. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Wu, H. Zhu, D. X. Liu, T.-K. Niu, X. Ren, R. Patel, W. N. Hait, and J.-M. Yang Silencing of Elongation Factor-2 Kinase Potentiates the Effect of 2-Deoxy-D-Glucose against Human Glioma Cells through Blunting of Autophagy Cancer Res., March 15, 2009; 69(6): 2453 - 2460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Chen, M. Riazy, E. M. Smith, C. G. Proud, U. P. Steinbrecher, and V. Duronio Oxidized LDL-Mediated Macrophage Survival Involves Elongation Factor-2 Kinase Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, January 1, 2009; 29(1): 92 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Chu and A. J. Shatkin Apoptosis and Autophagy Induction in Mammalian Cells by Small Interfering RNA Knockdown of mRNA Capping Enzymes Mol. Cell. Biol., October 1, 2008; 28(19): 5829 - 5836. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Chen, W. Xie, D. J. Kuhn, P. M. Voorhees, A. Lopez-Girona, D. Mendy, L. G. Corral, V. P. Krenitsky, W. Xu, L. Moutouh-de Parseval, et al. Targeting the p27 E3 ligase SCFSkp2 results in p27- and Skp2-mediated cell-cycle arrest and activation of autophagy Blood, May 1, 2008; 111(9): 4690 - 4699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Jin, R. S. DiPaola, R. Mathew, and E. White Metabolic catastrophe as a means to cancer cell death J. Cell Sci., February 1, 2007; 120(3): 379 - 383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Meley, C. Bauvy, J. H. P. M. Houben-Weerts, P. F. Dubbelhuis, M. T. J. Helmond, P. Codogno, and A. J. Meijer AMP-activated Protein Kinase and the Regulation of Autophagic Proteolysis J. Biol. Chem., November 17, 2006; 281(46): 34870 - 34879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Hippert, P. S. O'Toole, and A. Thorburn Autophagy in Cancer: Good, Bad, or Both? Cancer Res., October 1, 2006; 66(19): 9349 - 9351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. N. Hait, S. Jin, and J.-M. Yang A Matter of Life or Death (or Both): Understanding Autophagy in Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2006; 12(7): 1961 - 1965. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |