| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Cell, Tumor, and Stem Cell Biology |
Departments of 1 Developmental Neurobiology, 2 Genetics and Tumor Cell Biology, 3 Hartwell Center, and 4 Pathology, Saint Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
Requests for reprints: Tom Curran, Department of Developmental Neurobiology, Saint Jude Children's Research Hospital, 332 North Lauderdale Street, Memphis, TN 38105. Phone: 901-495-2255; Fax: 901-495-2270; E-mail: tom.curran{at}stjude.org.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
30% of human medulloblastomas, suggesting that it could provide a useful therapeutic target. Previously, we showed that spontaneous medulloblastomas in Ptc1+/p53/ mice could be eradicated by treatment with a small-molecule inhibitor (HhAntag) of Smoothened (Smo). Here, we compared the responses of mouse medulloblastoma cells propagated in flank allografts, either directly or after culture in vitro, to HhAntag. We found that Shh pathway activity was suppressed in medulloblastoma cells cultured in vitro and it was not restored when these cells were transplanted into the flank of nude mice. The growth of these transplanted tumor cells was not inhibited by treatment of mice with doses of HhAntag that completely suppressed Smo activity. Interestingly, tumor cells transplanted directly into the flank maintained Smo activity and were sensitive to treatment with HhAntag. These findings indicate that propagation of tumor cells in culture inhibits Smo activity in a way that cannot be reversed by transplantation in vivo, and they raise concerns about the use of cultured tumor cells to test the efficacy of Shh pathway inhibitors as anticancer therapies. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(8): 4215-22) | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
20% of cases. Current treatment, which involves surgical resection, chemotherapy, and radiation of the craniospinal axis, is often associated with major long-term side effects, particularly in young children (13). Therefore, there is a great need for new nontoxic therapies. However, the identification of improved therapies for medulloblastoma has been hampered by the lack of adequate model systems for testing novel drugs. Recently, genetically defined mouse models have shown promise as cancer model systems in which tumors arise spontaneously and recapitulate the histologic, spatial, and temporal context of the corresponding human disease (4, 5). Such models are particularly useful for proof-of-concept studies of molecular targeted therapies. Using the Ptc1+/p53/ mouse model of medulloblastoma (6), we successfully showed that a small-molecule inhibitor (HhAntag-691, hereafter referred to as HhAntag) of Smoothened (Smo; refs. 7, 8) could suppress the Sonic Hedgehog (Shh) pathway in vivo leading to the elimination of spontaneous mouse medulloblastoma (9). However, genetic models recapitulate only a specific disease subset and they do not encompass the full spectrum of the corresponding human cancer. In addition, such models are often not suited to high-throughput studies of potential new treatments. This is particularly the case for brain tumor models in which the analysis can be complex and very labor-intensive. Therefore, it is important to complement studies on genetic models with approaches involving cancer cells propagated in vitro and in vivo. The majority of preclinical cancer studies carried out to date employ human tumor cell lines or xenografts established in the flank of immunocompromised mice (10, 11). Although these models are often assumed to be representative of the original disease, the tumor cells have been removed from their native environment and selected for their ability to grow under artificial conditions. In addition, in some cancers, such as medulloblastoma, only a small percentage of tumors can be established as cell lines (1214) or transplants, and it is unclear whether such experimental models replicate the phenotype of the original tumor cells.
In the present study, we compared the molecular properties of medulloblastoma cell lines and allografts with those of the original tumors. We found that Shh pathway activity was maintained only in allografts derived directly from the original tumors but not in medulloblastoma cultures or allografts established using cultured tumor cells. In addition, the Shh pathway activity was maintained in serially transplanted allografts established directly from medulloblastomas. We found that whereas HhAntag was very effective at eliminating tumors in which Smo was active, it was completely ineffective against allografts in which the Shh pathway was down-regulated.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Allograft propagation. All mouse studies were carried out according to protocols approved by the institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital. Six-week-old female athymic nude mice (CD1 nu/nu; Charles River Breeding Laboratory, Wilmington, MA) were injected s.c. in the flank with single cell suspensions of 5 x 106 SJMM cells. For transplantation of fresh tumors, either a small piece of solid fragment or suspended tumor cells derived from Ptc1+/p53+/, Ptc1+/p53/ (6), and Lig4/p53/ (16) mice were implanted. For tumor cell suspension, small fragments of medulloblastoma were incubated with 500 µg/mL collagenase type IV, (Invitrogen) and 500 µg/mL hyaluronidase (Atlanta Biologicals, Lawrenceville, GA) for 30 minutes, then strained using a Cell-Strainer (40 mm, BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA) and resuspended in Matrigel (BD Bioscience); 2 to 3 x 106 cells were injected. Tumor sizes were measured using digital calipers (TRACEABLE, 0-200 mm; Control Company, Friendswood, TX) and tumor volumes were calculated according to the following formula, (
/6) x d3, where d is the mean diameter (17). Allografts with volumes in the 400 to 600 mm3 range were harvested and snap-frozen.
HhAntag treatment. Cohorts of mice bearing allografts of
200 mm3 were treated with vehicle alone or with 100 mg kg1 of HhAntag twice a day by oral gavage. Four hours after the last dose, mice were euthanized and allografts were fixed in 10% formalin or snap-frozen. HhAntag was obtained from Curis (Boston, MA) and Genentech (South San Francisco, CA).
Northern and Southern analyses. Total RNA and genomic DNA were isolated from snap-frozen tissues or cultured cells using the TriPure reagent (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN) and Genomic tip (Qiagen, Valencia, CA), respectively. RNA was analyzed by Northern blotting as described previously (18), using antisense RNA probes synthesized by the Strip-EZ RNA kit (Ambion, Austin, TX; refs. 9, 18). For Southern analysis, genomic DNA (5 µg) was digested with XbaI, and fragments were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis and transferred onto a NytranSPC membrane (Schleicher & Schuell BioScience, Keene, NH). Transferred DNA was hybridized with a radiolabeled Gli1 probe (corresponding to Met699-Pro870 of mouse Gli1), synthesized using the Rediprime II labeling system (Amersham, Piscataway, NJ). The intensity of signal was quantitated using the FluorChem 8900 system (Alpha Innotech, San Leandro, CA).
Immunoblotting. Immunoblotting was done as described previously (19), and protein concentrations were determined using the bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL).
Histologic analysis and immunohistochemistry. Allografts fixed in 10% formalin were embedded, sectioned and mounted on Superfrost+ slides (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA), as described previously (9). Paraffin sections were stained with H&E, and proliferation was quantitated using the Ki67 antibody (Novocastra Laboratory, Newcastle, United Kingdom), as described previously (9).
Fluorescence in situ hybridization. Five-micron-thick sections of allografts and medulloblastomas were mounted on poly-L-lysine-coated slides for dual-color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) experiments. Bacterial artificial chromosomederived probes specific for Gli1 gene (RP23-416B23, Research Genetics) and mouse chromosome 10 (RP23-43F3) were labeled with rhodamine and fluorescein, respectively. The labeling and FISH experiments were carried out as described previously (20).
Spectral karyotype analyses. Cells derived from SJMM-12 allografts were dissociated, cultured, and analyzed by spectral karyotype (SKY), using the Applied Spectral Imaging System (Carlsbad, CA; ref. 21). Briefly, after 4 hours of incubation with colcemid, cells were harvested, hybridized with probes, and imaged using the SkyPaint kit. Images were acquired with a fluorescence microscope (Nikon, Japan) equipped with an interferometer (Spectra Cube, Applied Spectral Imaging) and a custom designed filter cube (Chroma Technology Corporation, Rockingham, VT). SKY analysis was completed using the SKY View version 2.1 software. A total of 15 metaphase cells were analyzed for each sample.
Microarray gene expression analyses. Total RNA was extracted from four medulloblastomas (tumor-1, tumor-2, tumor-12, and tumor-21), four medulloblastoma cell cultures [SJMM-1, which was derived from tumor-1 (n = 2) and SJMM-12, which was derived from tumor-12 (n = 2)], seven culture-derived allografts (three from SJMM-1 cells, two from SJMM-2 cells, which were derived from tumor-2, and two from SJMM-12 cells), and three directly transplanted allografts (one from tumor-2 and two from tumor-21). The integrity of all RNA samples was verified using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. RNA samples were processed for hybridization without amplification and hybridized with the mouse genome 430 2.0 array (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA), which includes 45,101 probe sets representing
34,000 annotated genes. Labeling, hybridization, and scanning were done essentially as described previously, using the Affymetrix Microarray Suite version 5.0 software (MAS v5; ref. 22). MAS v5 data were normalized by global scaling. To stabilize variance, a small offset of 20 was added to each signal prior to log transformation. A t test was done on each probe set and the probe sets were ranked by the P value. Heat maps were generated using the z score of the log signal in Spotfire 8.1. Log ratios of signal are log2 ratios of geometric means of the stabilized signals, which were generated using STATA/SE 8.2 for Linux. To identify the changes in gene expression among medulloblastomas, tumor cell cultures, and allografts, the number of probe sets scored as overexpressed (>2-fold increase, log ratio > 1) and underexpressed (>2-fold decrease, log ratio < 1) were counted.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
30-fold) had occurred following transplantation. FISH analyses revealed a homogeneous staining region (hsr) containing Gli1 in the SJMM-12 allograft that was not detected in a SJMM-2 allograft or in medulloblastoma tumor tissue (Fig. 2B). SKY analysis also showed a large hsr on chromosome 10 in all of metaphase cells cultured from the SJMM-12 allograft (right, Fig. 2C). These results clearly indicate that increased Gli1 mRNA in SJMM-12 allografts is a consequence of gene amplification as opposed to the activation of the Shh pathway. The hsr on chromosome 10 preexisted in cultured SJMM-12 cells as it was observed in one of 15 metaphases from the starting material (data not shown), although the majority of cells had no hsr (left, Fig. 2C). It seems that the amplicon containing Gli1 conferred a selective advantage to transplanted SJMM-12 cells as all of the allografts exhibited amplification. Collectively, we did not observe reactivation of the Shh pathway in any of the transplanted tumor cell lines.
|
|
Using the direct allograft system, we also tested the effect of HhAntag on medulloblastomas derived from Ptc1+/p53+/ (6) and Lig4/p53/ mice (16). In both cases, HhAntag was very effective at inhibiting allograft growth (Fig. 3B). Furthermore, the ability of these allografts to respond to HhAntag was maintained for up to 3 passages in vivo (data not shown). Thus, the direct allograft system may provide a useful preclinical model to study the activity of Shh pathway antagonists in medulloblastoma.
To investigate the degree to which tumor allografts replicate the original medulloblastomas, we compared gene expression profiles by cDNA microarray analysis. The expression profiles of the Shh pathway genes were slightly different among all of the SJMM cell lines (Supplemental Fig. S1) and allografts (Fig. 1), indicating that each tumor-derived sample has a unique signature, perhaps reflecting the presence of additional gene mutations or variable epigenetic alterations. For this reason, each tumor-derived sample was compared with a matched sample of the original tumor.
The gene expression profiles of direct allografts were very similar to those of the original medulloblastoma with only 18% (tumor-2 versus direct allograft-2) or 14% (tumor-21 versus direct allograft-21) of the probe sets indicating differential expression in each one-chip to one-chip comparison (Supplemental Table S1). Interestingly, the ratio of differentially expressed genes remained relatively similar (13-19%), when we compared the gene expression profile of one medulloblastoma with direct allografts derived from other medulloblastomas (highlighted cells, Supplemental Table S1). Conversely, the gene expression profiles of cultured medulloblastoma cells were appreciably different from those of the original medulloblastomas with
40% of the probe sets indicating differential expression (tumor-1 versus SJMM-1 cells and tumor-12 versus SJMM-12 cells, Supplemental Table S1). A number of genes (30-44%) were differentially expressed when cultured tumor cells were propagated in vivo (Supplemental Table S1). The original gene expression profiles were not restored in culture-derived allografts, as the profiles of culture-derived allografts differed from the original medulloblastoma, with 37% (tumor-1 versus SJMM-1 allograft), 31% (tumor-2 versus SJMM-2 allograft), and 35% (tumor-12 versus SJMM-12 allograft) of probe sets indicating differential expression (Supplemental Table S1). These comparisons indicate that direct allografts recapitulated the gene expression profiles of the original medulloblastoma tumors and that both cultured tumor cells and allografts generated from cultured tumor cells were quite distinct from the original tumor. These data strongly support the use of direct medulloblastoma allografts to test the efficacy of Shh pathway inhibitors as well as other agents that target additional signaling pathways that are active in the original tumors.
To highlight the effects of growth environment on the gene expression signatures, we compared profiles among subgroups, including tumors (n = 4), cultured tumor cells (n = 4), culture-derived allografts (n = 7), and direct allografts (n = 3). These comparisons confirmed the observation that the gene expression profiles of direct allografts were very similar to those of medulloblastoma with only 1.8% (
800) of the probe sets indicating differential expression, in contrast to cultured medulloblastoma cells and culture-derived allografts (Fig. 4A
). Interestingly,
4,000 of the probe sets were differentially underexpressed in cultured medulloblastoma cells compared with tumors, which is much higher than the number of overexpressed genes (Fig. 4A). This indicates that many genes that are highly expressed in tumors are down-regulated or silenced during cell culture, which is consistent with the data from individual one-chip to one-chip comparisons (Supplemental Table S1).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The finding that Smo activity could not be restored by transplantation of cultured tumor cells into immunocompromised mice suggests that the tumor cells might have undergone a permanent epigenetic change, irrespective of the culture conditions. This effect occurs very rapidly after one passage in culture, hence, it is not likely to represent genetic selection in vitro. Genetic selection can occur, particularly after transplantation because a rare amplicon containing Gli1 was selected following transplantation of SJMM12 cells. It is possible that the tumor microenvironment, including stromal cells, maintains the ability of Smo to be inactivated by HhAntag, and this influence is lost when cells are placed in a monolayer culture. In the case of direct allografts, the tumor microenvironment may be retained by donor stromal cells for a long enough period to allow host stromal cells to take over this function. Alternatively, extracellular matrix and soluble factors that are present in vivo, but not in cell culture, may be critical for maintaining Smo function. Thus, it is possible that alternative culture conditions (including coculture with stromal cells, modulation of oxygen levels, neurosphere conditions, or culture in the presence of Shh) may allow medulloblastoma cells to maintain the Shh pathway activity in vitro.
The gene expression profiles of signaling pathway genes in direct allografts were very similar to those of the original tumors (Supplemental Table S2). In contrast, the gene expression profiles of tumor cell cultures and their allografts were strikingly different from those of the original medulloblastomas. As expected, cultured tumor cells failed to express many of the Shh pathway target genes (Figs. 1A and 4C and D; Supplemental Fig. S1). Furthermore, many other genes important for tumorigenesis, including mitogen-activated protein kinase and transforming growth factor-ß pathway genes were differentially expressed in cultured medulloblastoma cells (Supplemental Table S2), and the expression profiles for almost all of those genes were not restored in culture-derived allografts (data not shown). However, interestingly, the profiles of integrin and matrix metalloproteinaserelated genes, the expression levels of which were changed in culture (Supplemental Table S2), were restored in culture-derived allografts (data not shown), suggesting that substrate adhesion in monolayer culture might specifically influence these signaling pathways. Taken together, the expression data suggests that many signaling pathways that could be important for tumorigenesis are altered during the growth of tumor cells in vitro and in vivo. This raises concerns about many of the human tumor xenografts that are currently being used to test anticancer drugs as it is not yet clear if any of these have maintained an active Shh pathway.
As described above, medulloblastoma cultures and culture-derived allograft systems do not replicate the phenotypes of in situ tumors and are inappropriate for evaluating molecularly targeted agents. In the preclinical studies of medulloblastoma (2830) and other cancers in which the Shh pathway is important for tumor growth (3134), several tumor cell cultures and xenografts have been employed and characterized based only on their histology and the expression of a few marker genes. However, based on the data presented here, such limited evaluation might not be sufficient as we have shown that the Shh pathway remained suppressed in culture-derived allografts, despite the expression of selected marker genes.
Although HhAntag eliminated allografts in which the Shh pathway was active, it was completely ineffective against allografts that grew independently of the pathway. This suggests that HhAntag may work specifically on a subset of human medulloblastoma tumors in which components of the Shh pathway (including Shh, Ptc1, Smo, and Sufu) have been altered by mutation. Approximately 25% of sporadic human medulloblastomas are associated with mutations in different components of the Shh pathway (3, 3539). Our comparative analyses using different mouse systems strongly suggest that direct transplant models of human tumors may be most successful as preclinical models and that the molecular signature of the established xenografts must be compared with those of original tumors. We believe that the combined use of genetically altered mice and appropriate transplantation models of human tumors is important for preclinical drug development.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
We thank Christopher Calabrese for help with the allograft experiments, James Dalton, Marc Valentine, and Virginia Valentine for FISH and SKY analyses, members of the Curran Lab for helpful discussions and comments on the manuscript, and Curis and Genentech for providing HhAntag.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received 12/16/05. Revised 2/ 7/06. Accepted 2/23/06.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. J. Ward, L. Lee, K. Graham, T. Satkunendran, K. Yoshikawa, E. Ling, L. Harper, R. Austin, E. Nieuwenhuis, I. D. Clarke, et al. Multipotent CD15+ Cancer Stem Cells in Patched-1-Deficient Mouse Medulloblastoma Cancer Res., June 1, 2009; 69(11): 4682 - 4690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. C. Daniel, L. Marchionni, J. S. Hierman, J. T. Rhodes, W. L. Devereux, C. M. Rudin, R. Yung, G. Parmigiani, M. Dorsch, C. D. Peacock, et al. A Primary Xenograft Model of Small-Cell Lung Cancer Reveals Irreversible Changes in Gene Expression Imposed by Culture In vitro Cancer Res., April 15, 2009; 69(8): 3364 - 3373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Kessler, H. Hasegawa, S. N. Brun, B. A. Emmenegger, Z.-J. Yang, J. W. Dutton, F. Wang, and R. J. Wechsler-Reya N-myc alters the fate of preneoplastic cells in a mouse model of medulloblastoma Genes & Dev., January 15, 2009; 23(2): 157 - 170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Miele, N. Takebe, and S. P. Ivy The Cancer Stem Cell Hypothesis, Embryonic Signaling Pathways, and Therapeutics: Targeting an Elusive Concept ASCO Educational Book, January 1, 2009; 2009(1): 145 - 156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Shu, K. K. Wong, J. M. Su, A. M. Adesina, L. T. Yu, Y. T. M. Tsang, B. C. Antalffy, P. Baxter, L. Perlaky, J. Yang, et al. Direct Orthotopic Transplantation of Fresh Surgical Specimen Preserves CD133+ Tumor Cells in Clinically Relevant Mouse Models of Medulloblastoma and Glioma Stem Cells, June 1, 2008; 26(6): 1414 - 1424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Evangelista, H. Tian, and F. J de Sauvage The Hedgehog Signaling Pathway in Cancer Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. Educ. Book, April 12, 2008; 2008(1): 479 - 486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. J. Becher, D. Hambardzumyan, E. I. Fomchenko, H. Momota, L. Mainwaring, A.-M. Bleau, A. M. Katz, M. Edgar, A. M. Kenney, C. Cordon-Cardo, et al. Gli Activity Correlates with Tumor Grade in Platelet-Derived Growth Factor-Induced Gliomas Cancer Res., April 1, 2008; 68(7): 2241 - 2249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. Lindemann Stroma-Initiated Hedgehog Signaling Takes Center Stage in B-Cell Lymphoma Cancer Res., February 15, 2008; 68(4): 961 - 964. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Rossi, V. Caracciolo, G. Russo, K. Reiss, and A. Giordano Medulloblastoma: From Molecular Pathology to Therapy Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2008; 14(4): 971 - 976. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Q. Lun, H. Zhou, T. Alain, B. Sun, L. Wang, J. W. Barrett, M. M. Stanford, G. McFadden, J. Bell, D. L. Senger, et al. Targeting Human Medulloblastoma: Oncolytic Virotherapy with Myxoma Virus Is Enhanced by Rapamycin Cancer Res., September 15, 2007; 67(18): 8818 - 8827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Lauth, A. Bergstrom, T. Shimokawa, and R. Toftgard Inhibition of GLI-mediated transcription and tumor cell growth by small-molecule antagonists PNAS, May 15, 2007; 104(20): 8455 - 8460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Sasai, J. T. Romer, H. Kimura, D. E. Eberhart, D. S. Rice, and T. Curran Medulloblastomas Derived from Cxcr6 Mutant Mice Respond to Treatment with a Smoothened Inhibitor Cancer Res., April 15, 2007; 67(8): 3871 - 3877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Evangelista, H. Tian, and F. J. de Sauvage The hedgehog signaling pathway in cancer. Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2006; 12(20): 5924 - 5928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |