Cancer Research Targets Telomeres
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wrensch, M.
Right arrow Articles by Prados, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wrensch, M.
Right arrow Articles by Prados, M. D.
[Cancer Research 66, 4531-4541, April 15, 2006]
© 2006 American Association for Cancer Research

Epidemiology and Prevention

Serum IgE, Tumor Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Expression, and Inherited Polymorphisms Associated with Glioma Survival

Margaret Wrensch1, John K. Wiencke1, Joe Wiemels1, Rei Miike1, Joe Patoka1, Michelle Moghadassi1, Alex McMillan2, Karl T. Kelsey3, Kenneth Aldape4, Kathleen R. Lamborn1, Andrew T. Parsa1, Jennette D. Sison1 and Michael D. Prados1

1 Department of Neurological Surgery and 2 Comprehensive Cancer Center Biostatistics Core, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California; 3 Department of Genetics and Complex Diseases, Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts; and 4 Department of Pathology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas

Requests for reprints: Margaret Wrensch, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, Suite 503, 44 Page Street, San Francisco, CA 94102. Fax: 415-502-1787; E-mail: margaret.wrensch{at}ucsf.edu.


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 References
 
In population-based glioma patients, we examined survival in relation to potentially pertinent constitutive polymorphisms, serologic factors, and tumor genetic and protein alterations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), MDM2, and TP53. Subjects were newly diagnosed adults residing in the San Francisco Bay Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Area during 1991 to 1994 and 1997 to 1999 with central neuropathology review (n = 873). Subjects provided blood for serologic studies of IgE and IgG to four herpes viruses and constitutive specimens for genotyping 22 polymorphisms in 13 genes (n = 471). We obtained 595 of 697 astrocytic tumors for marker studies. We determined treatments, vital status, and other factors using registry, interview, medical record, and active follow-up data. Cox regressions for survival were adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, study series, resection versus biopsy only, radiation, and chemotherapy. Using a stringent P < 0.001, glioma survival was associated with ERCC1 C8092A [hazard ratio (HR), 0.72; 95% confidence limits (95% CL), 0.60-0.86; P = 0.0004] and GSTT1 deletion (HR, 1.64; 95% CL, 1.25-2.16; P = 0.0004); glioblastoma patients with elevated IgE had 9 months longer survival than those with normal or borderline IgE levels (HR, 0.62; 95% CL, 0.47-0.82; P = 0.0007), and EGFR expression in anaplastic astrocytoma was associated with nearly 3-fold poorer survival (HR, 2.97; 95% CL, 1.70-5.19; P = 0.0001). Based on our and others' findings, we recommend further studies to (a) understand relationships of elevated IgE levels and other immunologic factors with improved glioblastoma survival potentially relevant to immunologic therapies and (b) determine which inherited ERCC1 variants or other variants in the 19q13.3 region influence survival. We also suggest that tumor EGFR expression be incorporated into clinical evaluation of anaplastic astrocytoma patients. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(8): 4531-41)


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 References
 
About 14,000 people are diagnosed with and >10,000 die from glioma each year in the United States (1). Primary brain and central nervous system (CNS) tumors rank first among cancer types for the average years of life lost with an average of 20.1 years (compared, e.g., with 6.1 years for prostate cancer and 11.8 years for lung cancer; ref. 2). Survival from glioblastoma, the most common form of glioma in adults, is very poor; <3% of those ages ≥65 years and only 30% for those ages <45 years at diagnosis survive 2 years (1). Histologic type and grade, age, extent of resection, tumor location, radiation therapy, some chemotherapy protocols, Karnofsky performance status, and other functionality measures have been consistently and convincingly linked to glioma survival (3, 4). Investigators are currently trying to identify and understand tumor markers or patient characteristics that might influence survival or response to treatment (reviewed in ref. 5). Most studies have relied on patients in clinical trials (who generally have better survival than the overall population of glioma patients) or comparisons of long-term versus short-term survivors from selected clinical series. Patients with long-term survival, although uncommon for glioblastoma, could provide important clues to identify key pathways for developing future therapies.

Constitutive genetic influences on glioma prognosis and survival. It is being increasingly showed that common gene polymorphisms influence response to cancer therapies or otherwise influence prognosis and survival (recently reviewed in refs. 6, 7). Variants in cell cycle, DNA repair, detoxification, or immune response genes might alter function and the response of tumor cells to therapeutic agents or provide variation in host defenses against the tumor. Glioma survival has been associated with polymorphisms in EGF, GSTP1 and GSTM1, HLA A*32 and B*55, and GLTSCR1 S397S and ERCC2 D711D (8–11).

Immune and serologic factors. Immunotherapies are being intensely studied in attempts to improve brain tumor survival (12–15). That some brain tumors can depress the immune system has been known for some time (16, 17). The humoral and innate arms of the immune system have not been well studied in brain tumor survival. Our previous studies showed significant inverse associations of glioma case-control status with serum IgE levels as well as IgG levels to the varicella-zoster virus (VZV; refs. 18, 19), suggesting a potential protective effect on glioma development. If a causal relationship exists between IgE or IgG on glioma formation or growth, then elevated serum levels may also be associated with longer survival times. Therefore, we are now examining whether these serologic factors relate to glioma survival.

Studies of tumor markers in relation to survival. Although combined loss of 1p and 19q in oligodendroglial tumors are well-established favorable prognostic indicators (recently reviewed in ref. 20), there are no equally well validated prognostic indicators for astrocytic tumors. Amplification/overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is more common in older versus younger anaplastic astrocytoma patients (21). EGFR amplification/overexpression may also contribute to resistance to therapeutic modalities (22). In glioblastoma, EGFR overexpression may be associated with poor survival in younger adults (23–25). Recent studies examining expression profiles alone (26, 27) or in conjunction with comparative genomic hybridization (28) have identified candidate markers that represent promising leads for possible validation in larger studies.

In this article, we examine survival among population-based glioma cases with uniform neuropathology review in relation to polymorphisms in a variety of metabolic, DNA repair, and immune function genes; to total IgE and positivity of IgG to four herpes viruses; and to tumor genetic and expression alterations in TP53, EGFR, and MDM2.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 References
 
The University of California San Francisco (UCSF) Committee for Human Research and individual hospital institutional review boards approved pertinent methods for this study.

Subjects. Glioma eligibility criteria, ascertainment, interview, medical record abstraction, and mortality follow-up methods for the glioma cases have been previously described (29). Briefly, any adult (age >20 years) newly diagnosed with glioma [International Classification of Disease for Oncology, morphology codes 9380-9481 between August 1991 and April 1994 (series 1) and May 1997 and August 1999 (series 2)] who resided in six San Francisco Bay Area counties at the time of diagnosis was eligible to participate. Potentially eligible cases were identified using a rapid case ascertainment program available through a Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) participating registry, the Northern California Cancer Center (NCCC). Median time from diagnosis to recruitment was 98 days. The study group included consenting patients or their proxies who were interviewed about a variety of factors, who gave written consent to obtain and review pathology specimens and records, and whose review confirmed an eligible diagnosis. Blood and/or buccal specimens also were obtained from willing cases.

Neuropathology review. Pathology records and specimens were obtained from diagnosing hospitals, and a neuropathologist reviewed all tumors; Richard Davis reviewed cases diagnosed between 1991 and 1994, and Kenneth Aldape reviewed cases diagnosed between 1997 and 1999. Tumors were classified according to the WHO criteria described by Kleihues et al. (30), using a coding form developed for this study. Glioblastoma, anaplastic astrocytoma, and astrocytoma correspond to WHO grades 4, 3, and 2, respectively.

Determination of vital status. We determined vital status through linkage with NCCC-SEER in July 2004. We followed those not identified as deceased with a letter and follow-up phone calls. For those contacted and determined to be alive (n = 152), date of returned postcard or the last phone contact was their last known date alive. For six cases that we could not locate, we used the date of last contact as determined by NCCC-SEER. To summarize, patient survival time was either date of death or date of last contact from date of histologic diagnosis. For patients not known to be dead, the patient was censored as of the date of last contact.

Determination of treatment information. We previously described in detail methods for classifying treatments (29). To summarize, we used three sources of data, NCCC-SEER, medical record abstraction, and clinical trials database from UCSF, to code treatments, as follows: surgery (resection versus biopsy only), radiation treatment (given versus not given), and chemotherapy (given or not given).

Genotyping constitutive polymorphisms. We include polymorphisms that were measured on most of the subjects for whom blood or buccal specimens had been obtained. Twenty-two polymorphisms in 12 genes were considered. References are given for genotyping methods for polymorphisms we have published, and Table 1 shows the primers and conditions for polymorphisms that we have not previously published. Note that we use the National Center for Biotechnology Information standard abbreviations for gene names5 and the IUPAC-IUB standard initials for amino acids (31). The genes and polymorphisms in alphabetical order are CCR5 delta 32 deletion (32); ERCC1 C8092A; ERCC2 K751Q and R156R (33); GSTM1 deletion; GSTP1 I105V and A114V; GSTT1 deletion (34); IL4R I75V, E400A, C431R, S503P, Q576R, S752A; IL4 C34T; MDR1 C3435T (35); MEH H113Y and R139H; MGMT L84F (21) and I143V; and XRCC1 H280R and R399G. To summarize methods for constitutive DNA isolation and genotyping, DNA was isolated from heparinized whole blood using Qiagen column purification. For subjects who provided buccal specimens, buccal swabs were inserted into a 1.5-mL tube with 300 to 600 µL of 50 mmol/L NaOH and vortexed. The brush was then removed from the tube, making sure all liquid was reserved. The tube was boiled in a water bath at 95°C for 5 minutes. The tube was centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 1 minute, then the liquid was transferred into a freezing vial, and the amount of liquid was measured. The sample was neutralized by adding a 1:10 volume (10% final concentration) of 1 mol/L Tris-EDTA (pH 8). DNA concentration was measured using Hoescht-33258 fluorimetry. Up to 10 µL was used in a 50-µL PCR reaction. DNA was stored at –80°C. Restriction enzymes for genotyping were purchased from NEN Life Sciences (Boston, MA); PCR was carried out on an ABI 9600 thermocycler. Each reaction included the following: 1 µL of forward primer, 1 µL of reverse primer, 5 µL of deoxynucleotide triphosphates, 5 µL of 10x buffer solution (50 mmol/L KCl at pH 8.3); 37 µL of distilled water, 0.25 µL Taq, and 1 µL of DNA to give a final reaction volume of ~50 µL. All PCR reactions were at 94°C for 30 seconds, at the various annealing temperatures specific for each gene sequence (Table 1) for another 30 seconds, then at 72°C for a final 30 seconds; run on 3% to 4% agarose gel; and digested overnight or for 4 hours at 37°C. Quality control measures include blinded analyses, replicates of 10% of samples, and positive controls (blood-derived DNA from all known genotypes), and negative controls for contamination (no DNA) were run routinely with patient samples.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 1. NCBI gene symbols, rs numbers, primers, and conditions for selected polymorphisms genotyped for participants in the San Francisco Bay Area Adult Glioma Study, 1991-2000

 
Serologic markers. We assessed IgG seropositivity for herpes simplex virus (HSV), Epstein Barr Virus (EBV), Varicella Zoster Virus (VZV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), and total IgE (normal, borderline, and elevated), as previously described (18, 19). IgE assays were available only for series 2 subjects.

Tumor markers. We examine mortality in relation to six tumor markers assessed in glioblastoma and anaplastic astrocytoma. We did not have funding for assessment of markers in nonastrocytic gliomas, and there were too few astrocytoma grade 2 for separate consideration in this article. The markers studied are TP53 mutation (present in exons 5-8 versus absent), EGFR and MDM2 gene copy numbers (≤3 considered not amplified versus >3 considered amplified), and expression of TP53, EGFR, and MDM2 proteins as determined by immunohistochemistry (for TP53 and MDM2, we assessed staining as 0, none; 1, <5%; 2, 5-30%; or 3, >30% nuclei staining; for EGFR, we assessed membrane/cytoplasmic staining as 0, no staining; 1, weak/focal; and 2, strong diffuse). We recently published details of the laboratory methods for assessing these markers (21).

Statistical methods. We estimated median months survival from time of histologic diagnosis and 95% confidence limits (95% CL) overall and by genotypes, serologic results, and tumor marker status with life table (Kaplan-Meier) methods using the SAS PROC LIFETEST (36). We estimated hazard ratios (HR) for the days of survival after histologic diagnosis with the various individual markers using Cox proportional hazards regression models estimated with SAS PROC PHREG (37), initially adjusting for age, gender, ethnicity (White, non-White), and series (1 or 2). A gene-dose model was used for polymorphisms (GSTM1 or GSTT1: 0 = not null, 1 = null; for single nucleotide polymorphisms, 0, 1, and 2 represent the number of variants), and IgE levels were coded 0 = normal, 1 = borderline, 2 = elevated. Because there were six polymorphisms measured in interleukin-4 receptor (IL4R), we also computed a variable that gave the total number of variants (0-10 observed) in IL4R for each subject. The most likely haplotypes carried by each person were estimated using a Bayesian method implemented in PHASE 2.0.6 IL4R haplotypes were coded 0 = more common variant in the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and 1 = less common variant in the SNP with SNPs ordered according to numerical position (i.e., I75V, E400A, C431R, S503P, Q576R, and A752S); for example, haplotype 111110 would be 75V, 400A, 431R, 503P, 576R, and A752. Six of 25 estimated haplotypes were sufficiently common for additional analyses (011110, 000010, 000000, 111110, 100111, and 100000). Cox regressions included left truncation (the days between blood draw or buccal collection and the date of diagnosis) for individual polymorphisms, haplotypes, and serologic factors because the constitutive specimen collection took place after diagnosis. Because constitutive polymorphisms and serologic factors possibly could influence survival regardless of histologic type, models were run for all glioma, and separately for glioblastoma, and anaplastic astrocytoma; the all-glioma models were stratified by four histologic groups: glioblastoma, anaplastic astrocytoma, astrocytoma, and other. We selected polymorphisms or serologic factors for more in-depth analyses that yielded P < 0.10 for the above models. More in-depth analyses included adjustment for surgery (resection or biopsy only), radiation, and chemotherapy (given, not given) in addition to age, gender, ethnicity, and series (see ref. 29 for more details on these factors). Each of six IL4R haplotypes was included in a separate survival model (adjusting for age, gender, series, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy); each haplotype was coded as present if the subject carried the haplotype (either homozygous or heterozygous) and absent if the subject did not carry the haplotype. Some multivariate models included several polymorphisms in addition to the above adjustment factors. Because tumor markers vary by histologic type and were measured only in astrocytic tumors, separate models for glioblastoma and anaplastic astrocytoma were run.

Tabled results provide nominal Ps without correction for multiple comparisons. However, to minimize conclusions based on false positives due to the large number of comparisons, we emphasize findings with P < 0.001 [this is roughly equivalent to the Bonferroni correction for P = 0.05 / 33 (22 polymorphisms + 5 serologic variables + 6 tumor markers)].

To compare our results to the only other study (11) that reported several of the same polymorphisms studied here, we compared survival distributions with the log-rank test among a subgroup of anaplastic oligodendroglioma, anaplastic astrocytoma, or anaplastic oligoastrocytoma patients by their combined genotypes of GSTM1 deletion, GSTP I105V and A114V IIAA versus those who did not fall in this group.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 Conclusions
 References
 
The study group consisted of 873 glioma subjects: 519 with glioblastoma, 105 with anaplastic astrocytoma, and the remaining with other histologic types (Table 2 ). The relatively low overall genotyping rate of 54% (471 of 873; Table 2) is due to 241 subjects from the first series (1991-1994) having died before obtaining funding for blood collection; we obtained blood from 186 of 231 (81%) of the remaining subjects in that period. We obtained blood or buccal specimens from 71% (283 of 401) of participants recruited from 1997 to 1999. We obtained tumors from 89% (595 of 667) of patients with astrocytic tumors (glioblastoma, anaplastic astrocytoma, or astrocytoma grade 2). Although survival is substantially longer for subjects with genotyping data, subjects with tumor marker data had very similar survival to all subjects with comparable tumor types (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 2. Characteristics of glioma subjects, San Francisco Bay Area Adult Glioma Study, 1991-2000

 
Constitutive polymorphisms. The following polymorphisms were not associated with glioma, glioblastoma, or anaplastic astrocytoma survival with P > 0.10: ERCC2 K751Q and R156R, GSTM1 deletion, GSTP1 I105V and A114V, IL4 C34T, MEH H113Y, MGMT I143V, and XRCC1 H280R (data not shown). For all glioma, using the stringent criteria of P < 0.001, ERCC1 C8092A was associated with improved survival, and GSTT1 deletion was associated with poorer survival (Table 3 ). CCR5 delta 32 deletion, IL4R_C431R, IL4R_E400A (Table 3), and the number of IL4R variants (HR, 0.94; 95% CL, 0.90-0.99; P = 0.03) were associated with better survival using a nominal P < 0.05. Multivariate analyses, including various combinations of polymorphisms with P < 0.05, and the other usual adjustment factors showed that ERCC1 C8092A (HR, 0.69; 95% CL, 0.58-0.84; P = 0.0001) and GSTT1 deletion (HR, 1.66; 95% CL, 1.26-2.20; P = 0.0003) remained associated with glioma survival using the stringent criteria, whereas XRCC1 H280R gave an HR of 1.61 (95% CL, 1.11-2.32; P = 0.01), and the number of variants in IL4R yielded an HR of 0.95 (95% CL, 0.89-1.00; P = 0.07). Haplotype analysis of the six IL4R polymorphisms indicated persons with the haplotype with the rarer variant in all positions except A752S (i.e., haplotype 111110) had better survival than those who did not have this haplotype but not at the stringent significance level (HR, 0.64; 95% CL, 0.47-0.87; P = 0.004).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 3. Cox regressions of survival by selected genotypes using gene dose, 0-2 variants, San Francisco Bay Area Adult Glioma Study, 1991-2000

 
Although no polymorphisms were associated with glioblastoma survival using the stringent criteria of P < 0.001, CCR5 delta 32, ERCC1 C8092A, and GSTT1 deletion were associated with P < 0.05 (Table 3), as was the number of variants in IL4R (HR, 0.93; 95% CL, 0.88-0.99; P = 0.04) and the above mentioned haplotype (HR, 0.66; 95% CL, 0.46-0.95; P = 0.03). In a multivariate model using the same polymorphisms used in the model for all glioma above and the other usual adjustment factors, we obtained the following results: ERCC1 C8092A (HR, 0.72; 95% CL, 0.58-0.89; P = 0.003), XRCC1 H280R (HR, 1.69; 95% CL, 1.03-2.79; P = 0.04), GSTT1 deletion (HR, 1.59; 95% CL, 1.11-2.28; P = 0.01), and for the number of variants in IL4R (HR, 0.95; 95% CL, 0.88-1.01; P = 0.11). For anaplastic astrocytoma, no polymorphisms met the stringent criteria, but MEH R139H, MGMT L84F, and IL4R S503P and Q576R were associated with survival with nominal P < 0.05 (Table 3), as was the number of IL4R variants (HR, 0.85; 95% CL, 0.72-0.99; P = 0.04).

For comparison with results by Okcu et al. (11), 81 patients diagnosed with either anaplastic oligodendroglioma (N = 19), anaplastic astrocytoma (N = 53), or anaplastic oligoastrocytoma (N = 9) had genotyping data for GSTM1, GSTP I105V, and A114V. Median survival for those with GSTM1 deletion and GSTP 105/114 IIAA was 20.0 months (95% CL, 15.5-48.5; n = 18) versus 36.6 months (95% CL, 10.6-95.6; n = 63) for those with other combinations (log-rank comparison, P = 0.14).

Serologic factors. Positivity of IgGs to VZV and EBV was not associated with glioma survival (P > 0.10; data not shown). Elevated IgE levels were associated with improved glioblastoma survival (P = 0.0007) using stringent criteria (Fig. 1 ), and positivity for IgG to HSV was associated with poorer anaplastic astrocytoma survival (P = 0.03). Also note that overall, IgE levels were positively correlated with the numbers of IL4R variants (correlation = 0.13; P = 0.05). The mean numbers of days between glioblastoma diagnosis and blood collection did not materially differ between people with normal, borderline, and elevated IgE levels (mean ± SE: 119 ± 9, 129 ± 16, and 129 ± 13; Table 4 ).


Figure 1
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 1. Percent survival distributions for people with glioblastoma who had normal (- - -, n = 70), borderline (—, n = 32), and elevated (---, n = 13) serum IgE levels.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 4. Cox regressions of survival by selected serologic factors, San Francisco Bay Area Adult Glioma Study, 1991-2000

 
The three markers most highly associated with survival from analyses of individual markers (ERCC1 C8092A genotype, GSTT1 deletion status, and IgE) were not correlated, and we did not find noteworthy differences in HRs from models that included these markers individually or in combinations of two to three of these markers (data not shown).

Tumor markers. EGFR expression (P = 0.008) and MDM2 amplification (P = 0.04) were associated with better glioblastoma survival, whereas TP53 expression was associated with poorer survival (P = 0.05), although these associations did not meet the stringent statistical significance criteria. In a multivariate model including these three tumor markers and other adjustment factors for 403 glioblastoma patients, we found HR of 0.75 (95% CL, 0.61-0.92; P = 0.005) for EGFR expression, HR of 1.1 (95% CL, 0.98-1.19; P = 0.10) for MDM2 expression (coded 0-3), and HR of 1.11 (95% CL, 1.00-1.22; P = 0.03) for TP53 expression (coded 0-3; Table 5 ).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Table 5. Cox regressions of glioma survival by tumor EGFR, MDM2, and TP53 genetic and expression alterations, San Francisco Bay Area Adult Glioma Study, 1991-2000

 
For anaplastic astrocytoma, tumor EGFR expression was associated with three times worse survival (Table 5; Fig. 2 ; P = 0.0001). EGFR amplification also was associated with about 2-fold worse survival (P = 0.04) as was MDM2 expression (P = 0.003; Table 5), but neither met the stringent significance criteria.


Figure 2
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Figure 2. Percent survival distributions for people with anaplastic astrocytoma whose tumors did (---, n = 27) and did not (—, n = 55) express EGFR.

 

   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
Conclusions
 References
 
Each of the three classes of biomarkers evaluated here proved to be associated with variations in patient survival. To limit the number of possible false-positive associations, we used P < 0.001 for statistical significance criterion to account for the numbers of markers and comparisons tested.

Serologic IgE measurements. We observed the typical mortality profile for the deadly glioblastoma histology with nearly 65% of our study subjects deceased within 12 months of diagnosis. However, none of the 13 patients with elevated IgE succumbed during this same time. The very longest survivors (e.g., >40 months) were persons with high IgE, and they lived on average 9 months longer than those with normal or borderline levels. This suggests that those with higher IgE levels might have either better antitumor defenses or less aggressive tumors with weaker anti-immunologic effects. Given that half as many glioblastoma patients have elevated IgEs as normal population controls (11% versus 23%, respectively; ref. 18), it may be that high IgE levels are correlated with an effective antitumor response. The exact nature and specificity of this response warrants further investigation. In particular, the relationship to atopic allergy should be studied, as it may be relevant to glioma immunotherapy. In addition, correlating IgE levels with degree of tumor burden or extent of disease may yield insights into the relationship between secreted tumor specific factors and host immune responses.

This highly significant association of increased serum IgE with survival is the most novel of the present findings and raises the question whether IgE itself may have antitumor activity via its direct activity on glioma cells or other resident cells within the CNS in proximity to the tumor. Supporting the plausibility of this hypothesis is the fact that the inducible low-affinity IgE receptor CD23 can be expressed by astrocytes in vitro (38) and in vivo (39). In astrocytes, cell surface stimulation of CD23 expression induced production of nitric oxide and IL1ß (39), the latter up-regulates Fas and Fas ligand expression (40) and induces apoptosis (41). In addition, the CD23 gene is localized to chromosome 19p13.3 (42), a region with copy number gains and losses in gliomas (43–45). Although CD23 expression in glioma cells and tumors has not been examined, these genetic observations would predict that common cytogenetic subgroups of glioma could express varying amounts of IgE receptor and possibly different capacities for IgE-mediated signaling in patients with very high IgE levels. Modulating CD23 signaling was previously proposed to have therapeutic applications (46), and further efforts should be made to assess the actions of IgE within both malignant and normal astrocytes.

Because a primary limitation of this study is that constitutive DNA samples were unavailable for those people with the poorest survival owing to population registry ascertainment, results may not be generalizable to all glioblastoma patients. However, the delay from diagnosis to blood draw did not materially differ for glioblastoma patients in the three IgE groups, and the median survival of 12 months for all glioblastoma patients with blood specimens is typical of that seen in clinical trials.

Constitutive polymorphisms. Improved survival among ERCC1 C8092A variant carriers is of interest for several reasons. First, the very low P suggests that the association is unlikely to be due to chance. Second, the ERCC1 protein is involved in annealing DNA single-strand breaks and resolving DNA interstrand cross-links (47) and may affect sensitivity to cancer therapies (48, 49). In our study group, 82% of glioblastoma and 89% of anaplastic astrocytoma patients had radiation therapy, and 21% of glioblastoma and 34% of anaplastic astrocytoma patients had chemotherapy (29). Both increased expression of ERCC1 (50, 51) and heritable variants of the ERCC1 C8092A polymorphism (52) may be inversely related to non–small cell lung cancer survival time. ERCC1 8092A is also associated with greater gastrointestinal toxicity from platinum-based therapy (53). ERCC1 N118N was found to be significantly associated with clinical response to 5-fluorouracil plus oxalplatin in metastatic colorectal cancer (54). ERCC1 also is involved in chromosomal repair in cells damaged by ionizing radiation (55, 56). Interestingly, radiation exposure and EGFR signaling both induce ERCC1 expression (57), suggesting a need to explore links between these markers. Third, although C8092A is in the untranslated region of ERCC1, it is a nonsynonymous polymorphism in ASE-1 (a gene that is the antisense of ERCC1; ref. 58). This overlap is conserved in the mouse and even in the yeast ERCC1 homologue RAD10, suggesting an important biological function. Yamamoto et al. (59) indicate that the mouse PAF49 may be the homologue of human ASE-1, and that the protein plays an important role in rRNA transcription. Fourth, ASE-1 and ERCC1 are located close to putative glioma tumor suppressor genes GLTSCR1 and GLTSCR2 in 19q13.3 (24). Yang et al. (8) showed better survival for oligodendroglioma patients with the GLTSCR1 TT versus CT or CC genotypes (P = 0.02); they also reported that the ASE-1 polymorphism was not significantly associated with oligodendroglioma survival but did not provide the HR. Because our results may be due to linkage of the ERCC1 C8092A polymorphism with other genes or variants in this region, further work is warranted to identify which polymorphisms in the 19q13.3 region may be causally related to glioma prognosis.

The results for IL4R polymorphisms are noteworthy, although they did not meet stringent statistical significance criteria of P < 0.001. IL4R{alpha} chain influences IgE production through interactions with IL4 and IL13, promotes differentiation of Th2 cells, and can inhibit IL4-mediated cell proliferation and IL5 up-regulation by T cells.5 Two variants (S503P and Q576R) associated with increased asthma risk have been shown to be associated with decreased glioblastoma risk (60). In our study, several IL4R variants singly or combined (as variant counts or as a haplotype) were associated with increased survival; the two IL4R variants S503P and Q576R, when combined on the same allele are part of the haplotype associated with improved survival in the present study. This haplotype was the only common IL4R haplotype also to be associated with type 1 diabetes (61), high IL4R activity (62), and lower risk to asthma/allergy (63).

Only one other glioma survival study genotyped patients for some of the same polymorphisms reported here. Okcu et al. (11) examined GST polymorphisms in relation to glioma survival among 278 White adults ages 21 to 64 years with overall median survival of 21.2 months, similar to the 19.7 months observed for all glioma subjects here with genotyping data. They found no difference in median months survival by GSTT1 variant (21.6 for null and 21.4 for not null), but the HR of 1.2 (95% CL, 0.73-1.8) adjusted for age, diagnosis group, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and total resection versus subtotal resection or biopsy was consistent with our findings (HR, 1.6; 95% CL, 1.2-2.2), and the confidence intervals overlap. In 78 patients with anaplastic tumors, those who were GSTM1 null and homozygous GSTP1 I105V and A114V IIAA had nonsignificantly (P = 0.06) longer survival compared with those with other combinations of these genes (11), whereas we found the converse with P = 0.14. Because differences between the studies are compatible with chance, additional studies and well-conducted meta-analyses will be necessary to confirm or refute potential associations.

Tumor markers. It is very interesting that EGFR expression was associated with somewhat better survival among glioblastoma patients but much poorer survival among anaplastic astrocytoma patients. For anaplastic astrocytoma patients with EGFR expression, survival was only 9.9 months, nearly as poor as that of glioblastoma patients. This finding supports our and others' previous suggestion that anaplastic astrocytomas that overexpress EGFR might represent tumors that are more similar to glioblastoma (21). Incomplete tumor sampling is one possible explanation of why some anaplastic astrocytomas were found to overexpress EGFR. As we previously suggested, EGFR expression might be incorporated into clinical evaluation of anaplastic astrocytoma, and, if positive, might suggest greater scrutiny of the tumor for evidence of glioblastoma features. Because our criteria for glioblastoma included microvascular proliferation or necrosis, tumors with these features would not have been classified as anaplastic astrocytoma.

EGFR overexpression was more strongly associated than EGFR amplification with survival among both glioblastoma and anaplastic astrocytoma patients. Other studies also have reported that EGFR amplification does not correlate with glioblastoma survival (27, 64). About a third of tumors overexpressing EGFR do not contain gene amplification. The factors responsible for overexpression in the absence of gene amplification are not known, although recent studies have shown that a constitutive polymorphism in the regulatory portion of the EGFR gene is associated with increased expression and cancer risk (65, 66).

Others and we (23–25) previously reported age-dependent associations of EGFR expression with glioblastoma survival with overexpression associated with longer survival in older patients and with shorter survival in younger patients. In the present study, EGFR overexpression was associated with better glioblastoma survival irrespective of age group. The previous reports were from patients from clinical trials and thus may represent a somewhat different patient group than a population-based series. Taken together, the results indicate that (a) among glioblastoma patients, the predictive value of EGFR expression may depend on the patient population and (b) among anaplastic astrocytoma patients, EGFR expression is a marker predictive of clinical behavior similar to glioblastoma.

Also noteworthy is the very poor median survival (4 months) among anaplastic astrocytoma patients with 5% to 30% of cells staining for MDM2.

In the only other comparable population-based series, Ohgaki et al. (64) reported a significant difference in glioblastoma survival for those whose tumors had TP53 mutation (median months = 8.2) versus those without (median months = 7.2; P = 0.02) but did not adjust for age or other factors. We found very similar median glioblastoma survival times by TP53 tumor mutation status to their report, but after adjusting for age and other pertinent factors, we found a slightly positive nonsignificant HR for TP53 tumor mutation and glioblastoma survival.


   Conclusions
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
References
 
Based on these findings and those of others, we recommend that (a) EGFR expression be included in clinical evaluation of anaplastic astrocytoma patients; (b) confirming and understanding the relationship of elevated IgE levels, and possibly other immunologic factors, with improved glioblastoma survival should be a high priority in glioblastoma research; and (c) further work to understand the relationship of inherited ERCC1 or other variants in the 19q13.3 region is warranted. Our results also support the need for larger studies of the role of inherited variation in glioma survival.


   Acknowledgments
 
Grant support: NIH grants CA52689, CA097257, CA89032, ES06717, and ES04705 and the Robert J. and Helen H. Glaser Family Foundation.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

We thank Jeff Long, Mei Liu, and Linqian Zhao for laboratory assistance; Dr. Richard Davis for pathology review of series 1 cases; and the pathology departments of the following medical centers for providing tumor specimens for review and molecular analyses: Alexian Brothers Medical Center, Alta Bates Summit Medical Center, Brookside, California Pacific Medical Center, Doctor's Medical Centers Pinole and San Pablo, Eden Medical Center, El Camino Hospital, Good Samaritan Hospital, Alameda County Medical Center Highland Hospital, John Muir Medical Center, Kaiser Redwood City, Kaiser San Francisco, Kaiser Santa Teresa, Community Hospital of Los Gatos, Los Medanos Hospital, Marin General Hospital, Merrithew Memorial Hospital, Mills Peninsula Hospital, Mt. Diablo Medical Center, Mt. Zion Medical Center, Naval Hospital, O'Connor Hospital, Ralph K Davies Medical Center, Saint Louise, San Francisco General, San Jose, San Leandro, San Mateo County, San Ramon Valley, Santa Clara Valley, Sequoia, Seton Medical Center, St. Francis, St. Lukes, St. Rose, Stanford, UC San Francisco, Valley Livermore Memorial, Veterans Palo Alto, VA Medical Center San Francisco, and Washington Hospital.


   Footnotes
 
5 National Center for Biotechnology Information Entrez Gene (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), 2005. Back

6 Stephens, M. Software for haplotype estimation (http://www.stat.washington.edu/stephens/software.html), 2003. Back

Received 11/18/05. Revised 1/25/06. Accepted 2/ 9/06.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Conclusions
 References
 

  1. CBTRUS. Statistical report: primary brain tumors in the United States, 1997–2001. 244 East Ogden Avenue, Suite 116, Hinsdale, IL 60521: Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States, 2004–2005.
  2. Burnet NG, Jefferies SJ, Benson RJ, Hunt DP, Treasure FP. Years of life lost (YLL) from cancer is an important measure of population burden-and should be considered when allocating research funds. Br J Cancer 2005;92:241–5.[Medline]
  3. Levin V, Liebel S, Gutin P. Neoplasms of the central nervous system (section 2). In: DeVita VTJ, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, editors. Cancer: principles and practice of oncology. Vol. 2, 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins; 2001. p. 2100–60.
  4. Lamborn KR, Chang SM, Prados MD. Prognostic factors for survival of patients with glioblastoma: recursive partitioning analysis. Neuro-oncol 2004;6:227–35.[Abstract]
  5. Wrensch M, Fisher J, Schwartzbaum J, Bondy M, Berger M, Aldape K. The molecular epidemiology of gliomas in adults. Neurosurg Focus 2005;19:E5.[Medline]
  6. Loktionov A. Common gene polymorphisms, cancer progression and prognosis. Cancer Lett 2004;208:1–33.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Nagasubramanian R, Innocenti F, Ratain MJ. Pharmacogenetics in cancer treatment. Annu Rev Med 2003;54:437–52. Epub 2001 Dec 2003.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Yang P, Kollmeyer TM, Buckner K, Bamlet W, Ballman KV, Jenkins RB. Polymorphisms in GLTSCR1 and ERCC2 are associated with the development of oligodendrogliomas. Cancer 2005;103:2363–72.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Tang J, Shao W, Dorak MT, et al. Positive and negative associations of human leukocyte antigen variants with the onset and prognosis of adult glioblastoma multiforme. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14:2040–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Bhowmick DA, Zhuang Z, Wait SD, Weil RJ. A functional polymorphism in the EGF gene is found with increased frequency in glioblastoma multiforme patients and is associated with more aggressive disease. Cancer Res 2004;64:1220–3.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Okcu MF, Selvan M, Wang LE, et al. Glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms and survival in primary malignant glioma. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:2618–25.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Hussain SF, Heimberger AB. Immunotherapy for human glioma: innovative approaches and recent results. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2005;5:777–90.[Medline]
  13. Zalutsky MR. Current status of therapy of solid tumors: brain tumor therapy. J Nucl Med 2005;46 Suppl 1:151–6S.
  14. Wheeler CJ, Black KL. Dendritic cell vaccines and immunity in glioma patients. Front Biosci 2005;10:2861–81.[Medline]
  15. Sikorski CW, Lesniak MS. Immunotherapy for malignant glioma: current approaches and future directions. Neurol Res 2005;27:703–16.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Walker PR, Calzascia T, Dietrich PY. All in the head: obstacles for immune rejection of brain tumours. Immunology 2002;107:28–38.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Mahaley MS, Jr., Brooks WH, Roszman TL, Bigner DD, Dudka L, Richardson S. Immunobiology of primary intracranial tumors. Part 1: studies of the cellular and humoral general immune competence of brain-tumor patients. J Neurosurg 1977;46:467–76.[Medline]
  18. Wiemels JL, Wiencke JK, Patoka J, et al. Reduced immunoglobulin E and allergy among adults with glioma compared with controls. Cancer Res 2004;64:8468–73.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Wrensch M, Weinberg A, Wiencke J, et al. History of chickenpox and shingles and prevalence of antibodies to varicella-zoster virus and three other herpesviruses among adults with glioma and controls. Am J Epidemiol 2005;161:1–10.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. van den Bent MJ. Advances in the biology and treatment of oligodendrogliomas. Curr Opin Neurol 2004;17:675–80.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Wiencke J, Aldalpe K, McMillan A, et al. Molecular features of adult glioma associated with patient race/ethnicity, age, and a polymorphism in MGMT (O6-alkylguanin-DNA-alkyltransferase). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14:1774–83.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Barker FG II, Simmons ML, Chang SM, et al. EGFR overexpression and radiation response in glioblastoma multiforme. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001;51:410–8.[Medline]
  23. Simmons ML, Lamborn KR, Takahashi M, et al. Analysis of complex relationships between age, p53, epidermal growth factor receptor, and survival in glioblastoma patients. Cancer Res 2001;61:1122–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Smith JS, Tachibana I, Passe SM, et al. PTEN mutation, EGFR amplification, and outcome in patients with anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma multiforme. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:1246–56.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Batchelor TT, Betensky RA, Esposito JM, et al. Age-dependent prognostic effects of genetic alterations in glioblastoma. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:228–33.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Freije WA, Castro-Vargas FE, Fang Z, et al. Gene expression profiling of gliomas strongly predicts survival. Cancer Res 2004;64:6503–10.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Rich JN, Hans C, Jones B, et al. Gene expression profiling and genetic markers in glioblastoma survival. Cancer Res 2005;65:4051–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Nigro JM, Misra A, Zhang L, et al. Integrated array-comparative genomic hybridization and expression array profiles identify clinically relevant molecular subtypes of glioblastoma. Cancer Res 2005;65:1678–86.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Wrensch M, Rice T, Miike R, et al. Diagnostic, treatment and demographic factors influencing survival in population based glioma patients in the San Francisco Bay Area. Neuro-oncol 2006;8:12–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Kleihues P, Burger PC, Scheithauer BW. The new WHO classification of brain tumours. Brain Pathol 1993;3:255–68.[Medline]
  31. IUPAC-IUB Joint Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature (JCBN). Nomenclature and symbolism for amino acids and peptides. Recommendations 1983. Eur J Biochem 1984;138:9–37.[Medline]
  32. Wiencke JK, Kelsey KT, Zuo ZF, Weinberg A, Wrensch MR. Genetic resistance factor for HIV1 and immune response to varicella zoster virus. Lancet 2001;357:360–1.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Wrensch M, Kelsey K, Liu M, et al. ERCC1 and ERCC2 polymorphisms and adult glioma. Neuro-oncol 2005;7:495–507.[Abstract]
  34. Wrensch M, Kelsey KT, Liu M, et al. Glutathione-S-transferase variants and adult glioma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004;13:461–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Miller KL, Kelsey KT, Wiencke JK, et al. The C3435T polymorphism of MDR1 and susceptibility to adult glioma. Neuroepidemiology 2005;25:85–90.[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. SAS Institute. SAS procedures guide, version 6, 3rd ed. Cary (NC): SAS Institute; 1990. p. xi, 705.
  37. Stokes ME, Davis CS, Koch GG. Categorical data analysis using the SAS system. Cary (NC): SAS Institute; 1995. p. iv, 499.
  38. Hunot S, Dugas N, Faucheux B, et al. FcepsilonRII/CD23 is expressed in Parkinson's disease and induces, in vitro, production of nitric oxide and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in glial cells. J Neurosci 1999;19:3440–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Dugas N, Lacroix C, Kilchherr E, Delfraissy JF, Tardieu M. Role of CD23 in astrocytes inflammatory reaction during HIV-1 related encephalitis. Cytokine 2001;15:96–107.[Medline]
  40. Choi C, Park JY, Lee J, et al. Fas ligand and Fas are expressed constitutively in human astrocytes and the expression increases with IL-1, IL-6, TNF-alpha, or IFN-gamma. J Immunol 1999;162:1889–95.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Saas P, Boucraut J, Quiquerez AL, et al. CD95 (Fas/Apo-1) as a receptor governing astrocyte apoptotic or inflammatory responses: a key role in brain inflammation? J Immunol 1999;162:2326–33.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Conrad DH, Campbell KA, Bartlett WC, Squire CM, Dierks SE. Structure and function of the low affinity IgE receptor. Adv Exp Med Biol 1994;347:17–30.[Medline]
  43. Hirose Y, Aldape KD, Chang S, Lamborn K, Berger MS, Feuerstein BG. Grade II astrocytomas are subgrouped by chromosome aberrations. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2003;142:1–7.[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Huhn SL, Mohapatra G, Bollen A, Lamborn K, Prados MD, Feuerstein BG. Chromosomal abnormalities in glioblastoma multiforme by comparative genomic hybridization: correlation with radiation treatment outcome. Clin Cancer Res 1999;5:1435–43.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Wiltshire RN, Herndon JE II, Lloyd A, et al. Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of astrocytomas: prognostic and diagnostic implications. J Mol Diagn 2004;6:166–79.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Conrad DH, Kilmon MA, Studer EJ, Cho S. The low-affinity receptor for IgE (Fc epsilon RII or CD23) as a therapeutic target. Biochem Soc Trans 1997;25:393–7.[Medline]
  47. Niedernhofer LJ, Odijk H, Budzowska M, et al. The structure-specific endonuclease ERCC1XPF is required to resolve DNA interstrand cross-link-induced double-strand breaks. Mol Cell Biol 2004;24:5776–87.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Reed E. ERCC1 and clinical resistance to platinum-based therapy. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:6100–2.[Free Full Text]
  49. Seve P, Dumontet C. Chemoresistance in non-small cell lung cancer. Curr Med Chem Anti-Canc Agents 2005;5:73–88.[CrossRef]
  50. Rosell R, Taron M, Ariza A, et al. Molecular predictors of response to chemotherapy in lung cancer. Semin Oncol 2004;31:20–7.[Medline]
  51. Simon GR, Sharma S, Cantor A, Smith P, Bepler G. ERCC1 expression is a predictor of survival in resected patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Chest 2005;127:978–83.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Zhou W, Gurubhagavatula S, Liu G, et al. Excision repair cross-complementation group 1 polymorphism predicts overall survival in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:4939–43.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Suk R, Gurubhagavatula S, Park S, et al. Polymorphisms in ERCC1 and grade 3 or 4 toxicity in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:1534–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Viguier J, Boige V, Miquel C, et al. ERCC1 codon 118 polymorphism is a predictive factor for the tumor response to oxaliplatin/5-fluorouracil combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:6212–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Murray D, Macann A, Hanson J, Rosenberg E. ERCC1/ERCC4 5'-endonuclease activity as a determinant of hypoxic cell radiosensitivity. Int J Radiat Biol 1996;69:319–27.[CrossRef][Medline]
  56. Griffin C, Waard H, Deans B, Thacker J. The involvement of key DNA repair pathways in the formation of chromosome rearrangements in embryonic stem cells. DNA Repair (Amst) 2005;4:1019–27.
  57. Yacoub A, McKinstry R, Hinman D, Chung T, Dent P, Hagan MP. Epidermal growth factor and ionizing radiation up-regulate the DNA repair genes XRCC1 and ERCC1 in DU145 and LNCaP prostate carcinoma through MAPK signaling. Radiat Res 2003;159:439–52.[CrossRef][Medline]
  58. Hoeijmakers JHJ, Weeda G, Troelstra C, et al. (Sub)chromosomal localization of the human excision repair genes ERCC-3 and -6, and identification of a gene (ASE-1) overlapping with ERCC-1. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1989;51:1014.
  59. Yamamoto K, Yamamoto M, Hanada K, Nogi Y, Matsuyama T, Muramatsu M. Multiple protein-protein interactions by RNA polymerase I-associated factor PAF49 and role of PAF49 in rRNA transcription. Mol Cell Biol 2004;24:6338–49.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Schwartzbaum J, Ahlbom A, Malmer B, et al. Polymorphisms associated with asthma are inversely related to glioblastoma multiforme. Cancer Res 2005;65:6459–65.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Mirel DB, Valdes AM, Lazzeroni LC, Reynolds RL, Erlich HA, Noble JA. Association of IL4R haplotypes with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 2002;51:3336–41.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Risma KA, Wang N, Andrews RP, et al. V75R576 IL-4 receptor alpha is associated with allergic asthma and enhanced IL-4 receptor function. J Immunol 2002;169:1604–10.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  63. Hackstein H, Hofmann H, Bohnert A, Bein G. Definition of human interleukin-4 receptor alpha chain haplotypes and allelic association with atopy markers. Hum Immunol 1999;60:1119–27.[CrossRef][Medline]
  64. Ohgaki H, Dessen P, Jourde B, et al. Genetic pathways to glioblastoma: a population-based study. Cancer Res 2004;64:6892–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  65. Amador ML, Oppenheimer D, Perea S, et al. An epidermal growth factor receptor intron 1 polymorphism mediates response to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors. Cancer Res 2004;64:9139–43.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. Buerger H, Packeisen J, Boecker A, et al. Allelic length of a CA dinucleotide repeat in the EGFR gene correlates with the frequency of amplifications of this sequence-first results of an inter-ethnic breast cancer study. J Pathol 2004;203:545–50.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Immunol.Home page
E. A. Nigro, A. T. Brini, E. Soprana, A. Ambrosi, D. Dombrowicz, A. G. Siccardi, and L. Vangelista
Antitumor IgE Adjuvanticity: Key Role of Fc{epsilon}RI
J. Immunol., October 1, 2009; 183(7): 4530 - 4536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
P. Rajaraman, A. V. Brenner, M. A. Butler, S. S. Wang, R. M. Pfeiffer, A. M. Ruder, M. S. Linet, M. Yeager, Z. Wang, N. Orr, et al.
Common Variation in Genes Related to Innate Immunity and Risk of Adult Glioma
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2009; 18(5): 1651 - 1658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. E. Scheurer, E. Amirian, Y. Cao, M. R. Gilbert, K. D. Aldape, D. G. Kornguth, R. El-Zein, and M. L. Bondy
Polymorphisms in the Interleukin-4 Receptor Gene are Associated with Better Survival in Patients with Glioblastoma
Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2008; 14(20): 6640 - 6646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Neuro Oncol DukeHome page
M. Linnebank, A. Semmler, S. Moskau, Y. Smulders, H. Blom, and M. Simon
The methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) variant c.677C>T (A222V) influences overall survival of patients with glioblastoma multiforme
Neuro-oncol, August 1, 2008; 10(4): 548 - 552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 NEJMHome page
P. Y. Wen and S. Kesari
Malignant Gliomas in Adults
N. Engl. J. Med., July 31, 2008; 359(5): 492 - 507.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J EpidemiolHome page
A. Wigertz, S. Lonn, J. Schwartzbaum, P. Hall, A. Auvinen, H. C. Christensen, C. Johansen, L. Klaeboe, T. Salminen, M. J. Schoemaker, et al.
Allergic Conditions and Brain Tumor Risk
Am. J. Epidemiol., October 15, 2007; 166(8): 941 - 950.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
G. M. E. Matta, S. Battaglio, C. DiBello, P. Napoli, C. Baldi, G. Ciccone, M. Coscia, M. Boccadoro, and M. Massaia
Polyclonal Immunoglobulin E Levels Are Correlated with Hemoglobin Values and Overall Survival in Patients with Multiple Myeloma
Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2007; 13(18): 5348 - 5354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. L. Wiemels, J. K. Wiencke, K. T. Kelsey, M. Moghadassi, T. Rice, K. Y. Urayama, R. Miike, and M. Wrensch
Allergy-Related Polymorphisms Influence Glioma Status and Serum IgE Levels
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2007; 16(6): 1229 - 1235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. Wrensch, A. McMillan, J. Wiencke, J. Wiemels, K. Kelsey, J. Patoka, H. Jones, V. Carlton, R. Miike, J. Sison, et al.
Nonsynonymous Coding Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms Spanning the Genome in Relation to Glioblastoma Survival and Age at Diagnosis
Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2007; 13(1): 197 - 205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wrensch, M.
Right arrow Articles by Prados, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wrensch, M.
Right arrow Articles by Prados, M. D.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online