| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Epidemiology and Prevention |
1 Department of Community and Family Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China and 2 Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Kowloon, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
Requests for reprints: Ignatius T.S. Yu, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, 4/F, School of Public Health, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China. Phone: 852-2252-8773; Fax: 852-2606-3500; E-mail: iyu{at}cuhk.edu.hk.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionAppendix A. Residential Radon...References |
|---|
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionAppendix A. Residential Radon...References |
|---|
Although cigarette smoking is well established as the prime cause of lung cancer in men (8), only 
36% of new cases of female lung cancer in Hong Kong and 24% in Shanghai could be attributed to smoking (9, 10). Besides active smoking, environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) has been linked to excess risk of lung cancer in epidemiologic studies (11–13). However, the overall evidence indicates that this association is weak (in terms of relative risk) and varied widely according to the study design and the population under study (14, 15).
Epidemiologic studies conducted among Chinese women in China (16–21), Taiwan (22), and Singapore (23) found excess risk of lung cancer among subjects who cooked more. However, various exposure indices were used, and none considered intensity and duration of exposure simultaneously. Furthermore, most previous studies did not adequately address the influence of potential confounding factors, such as dietary habits and residential radon exposure (RRE).
In the present study, we investigated the association between lung cancer and fumes emitted from Chinese-style cooking among Hong Kong Chinese women using a composite index for lifetime cumulative exposure and taking into account the influence of various potential confounding factors.
|
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionAppendix A. Residential Radon...References |
|---|
Control subjects were randomly sampled from residents of districts where the cases came from using the residential telephone directory. They were frequency matched by 10-year age groups according to the age distribution of incident female lung cancer cases. All controls must have no history of physician-diagnosed cancer in any site. We identified 661 eligible control subjects, and 322 (48.7%) subjects were successfully interviewed. We excluded 30 smokers, leaving 292 controls. Seven subjects had missing data in some variables, and only 285 controls were used in the data analysis.
Data collection. Trained interviewers conducted in-person interviews using a standardized structured questionnaire to collect information on cooking habits and potential confounding factors. Only six cases and six controls could not provide the information themselves, and their first-degree relatives were interviewed. Relevant medical information, medical diagnosis, International Classification of Diseases codes, histologic findings, etc. were abstracted from the hospital records. Approval to conduct this study was granted by the relevant ethics committees of both the Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China) and the Queen Elizabeth Hospital (Kowloon, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China). Informed consent was obtained before each interview.
Assessment of Cooking Fumes Exposure
We collected information on regular cooking habits at each residence since childhood, including the number of years of cooking, the frequencies of stir-frying, frying, and deep-frying, the types of cooking oils used, the use of fume extractor or exhaust fan, and the habit of heating up a wok (Chinese pan) to high temperatures.
To take into account both the frequency and the duration of cooking, we constructed a new composite index, the cooking dish-years. The cooking dish-years for three cooking methods (stir-frying, frying, and deep-frying) were calculated separately. The concept of cooking dish-years is similar to the smoking pack-years widely used for measuring cigarette smoking in epidemiologic studies. One stir-frying dish-year means cooking one stir-fried dish daily for a year. The dish-years for each cooking methods was computed:
 |
The total cooking dish-years was calculated by summing up the stir-frying dish-years, frying dish-years, and deep-frying dish-years.
Potential Confounding Variables
We collected information on several potential confounding factors, including ETS exposure, RRE, other sources of indoor air pollutants (cooking fuel used, incense burning, and use of mosquito coils), dietary habits, preexisting lung diseases, family history of cancer, and sociodemographic factors. ETS exposure was defined as ever lived or worked with a smoker for at least 1 year and was regularly exposed to tobacco smoke (12). RRE was assessed based on detailed information about the lifetime residences (floor level, building material and wall surface covering materials, building age, and window opening practices) of all subjects, using information available from a territory-wide indoor radon survey in Hong Kong (details given in Appendix A; ref. 25) A reduced version of the Diet History Questionnaire designed by the National Cancer Institute was used to collect the information on diet (26).
Statistical analysis. All data were double keyed into a database using EpiData version 2.0 (27). 
2 tests or t tests were used to test differences of sociodemographic factors between the cases and controls. The total cooking dish-years was categorized into five groups using intervals of 50 dish-years, and unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) of each category using the lowest category as reference. The relationship between the exposure index (total cooking dish-years in five categories) and the risk of lung cancer was further examined after adjusting for age and various groups of potential confounding factors using multiple logistic regression models. Model 1 included age and four personal/familial variables (education, employment status, past history of lung diseases, and history of lung cancer in first-degree relatives). Model 2 included age and six indoor pollutant exposure variables (ETS, RRE, kerosene use, firewood use, incense burning, and mosquito coil use). Model 3 included age and nine dietary factors (intakes of orange/yellow vegetables, dark green vegetables, meats, citrus fruits, salted fish, pickled vegetables, and multivitamins, and coffee and tea drinking). All 20 potential confounding variables were then included in a final model (model 4).
To further explore associations between cooking habits and lung cancer, ORs for the habit of heating a wok to high temperatures, use of fume extractor or exhaust fan, and habits of using three types of cooking oil were estimated among those who had ever cooked by logistic regression models controlling for age, total cooking dish-years (in five categories), and potential confounding factors that were statistically significant in the model 4.
ORs for stir-frying dish-years, frying dish-years, and deep-frying dish-years (in multiples of 10) were computed, adjusting for age and potential confounding factors that were statistically significant in the model 4 for the purpose of comparing the magnitude of association between these three traditional Chinese-style cooking methods and lung cancer. The total cooking dish-year was not included in these regressions as it was compiled from the three subtypes of frying dish-years.
All analyses were carried out using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software version 13.0 for windows.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionAppendix A. Residential Radon...References |
|---|
The distributions of matching and major risk factors among cases and controls are shown in Table 1
. More cases than controls had never been employed (19% versus 11.9%; P = 0.043 for 2 test). There were no significant differences between the cases and controls in mean age at interview and current residence district as well as for the other six sociodemographic factors: marital status, educational level, place of birth, current monthly household income, current average living area, and type of current living quarter. The mean total cooking dish-years was 90 among the cases and 65 among the controls, the difference being highly statistically significant (P < 0.001, t test). Significant associations were also found between lung cancer and the following variables: past history of lung diseases, lung cancer in first-degree relatives, RRE (only for linear-by-linear association), intakes of dark green vegetables, yellow orange vegetables, meat, and multivitamins, and coffee drinking. The association with ETS was not statistically significant.
|
|
|
As shown in Table 4 , more cases (67.9%) always heated a wok to high temperatures than controls (46.6%). The ORs for subjects who sometimes and always heated a wok to high temperatures were 1.22 and 2.72 compared with those who never or seldom did so. Very few subjects never used fume extractor and/or exhaust fan (6.2% and 5.8% for cases and controls, respectively). Subjects who ever used fume extractor and/or exhaust fan had a nonsignificant lower risk of lung cancer (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.43-2.02). Those who always used peanut oil seemed to have a higher risk (OR, 1.45) but not statistically significant. Few cases and controls always used corn oil and canola oil, and no significant associations with lung cancer risk were found. Adjusting for total cooking dish-years and potential confounding factors did not materially change the associations. The ORs for the five categories of total cooking dish-years did not change much in the regression models with these variables on cooking habits, and the dose-response relationship seen in the earlier analysis was preserved.
|
A group of eligible cases in the present study came from inpatients who had to undergo surgical operations for suspected lung cancer. A total of 114 inpatients were interviewed before the operation, and they were handled as cases when interviews were conducted. Thirty-nine of them did not have primary lung cancer after the diagnostic workup, and they reported much less exposures than the 75 confirmed cases (mean of 46 versus 87 total dish-years; P < 0.005, t test).
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionAppendix A. Residential Radon...References |
|---|
3 to 4 for those with >100 total cooking dish-years (e.g., cooking five dishes daily for a period of 20 years or cooking four dishes daily for a period of 25 years or cooking two dishes daily for a period of 50 years) and increased to >8 among those with >200 total cooking dish-years (indicating quite intensive regular cooking). A nice dose-response relationship between the cumulative exposure to cooking fumes and lung cancer risk was shown even after adjusting for major potential confounding factors. We further found that different methods of frying were associated with different levels of risks, with deep-frying having the highest risk and stir-frying the lowest. This comparison among different frying methods using the same denominator (10 cumulative dish-years) has not been reported before. Most past studies on cooking fume exposure and lung cancer used the usual cooking practices before the diagnosis of lung cancer to compile the exposure index without consideration of the possible changes with time. Subjective exposure indices used included "smokiness" and "eye irritation," and the associations with lung cancer were quite consistent (16, 18, 20, 23, 28), but these indicators were more subjected to recall bias. The duration (years) of cooking was positively associated with lung cancer risk in some earlier studies (17), but more recent studies reported no significant associations (21, 28). The frequency of cooking, including different types of frying, was also used to indicate exposure. The number of meals cooked daily did not have a consistent association with lung cancer risk (19, 21, 28). The frequency (intensity) of stir-frying (16, 20–23), frying (20, 22), and deep-frying (16, 18, 20) seemed to be positively associated with lung cancer risk, but a clear dose-response relationship could not be adequately documented in any of the past studies. The total cooking dish-years used in the current study measured both the frequency (intensity) and the duration of cooking and was therefore superior to exposure indices used in previous studies in reflecting the total dose of exposure. This was supported by our analyses, indicating that the total cooking dish-years provided the best model fit among the three indicators used (frequency, duration, and cumulative) and that the total cooking dish-years was the only exposure indicator selected into the final model using a stepwise approach. Due to the retrospective nature of the study, direct measurements of the cooking fume exposures could not be done.
Consistent with previous studies (20, 28), the habit of heating the wok to high temperatures increased the risk of lung cancer. Over 50 volatile organic compounds have been identified from heated oil as well as cooked foods, and some of these agents in emissions of cooking oils are mutagens and human carcinogens, such as 1,3-butadiene, benzene, benzo(a)pyrene, dibenzo(a,h)anthracene, acrolein, and formaldehyde (29–34). It has been found in experimental studies that temperature is the most important factor for mutagen formation (35, 36). The use of fume extractor or exhaust fan did not confer benefit as found in a previous study (22). The type of cooking oil did not have a significant influence on lung cancer risk, and rapeseed oil was not used in Hong Kong.
We collected information on all major risk factors of lung cancer and examined their potential confounding effects on the association between cooking fume exposure and lung cancer, including RRE and dietary factors, which were frequently neglected in past studies. Our statistical analysis did not support important confounding effects from radon exposure and ETS, though they might have independent effects on the risk of lung cancer. In fact, in our final model, both types of exposures did increase the risk of lung cancer, but their effects were not statistically significant in our regression models. Nonsmoking women exposed to ETS at home and/or at work had an OR of 1.35 (P = 0.67) in the final model, and this level of risk is compatible with results from previous epidemiologic studies (37–39). The effect of ETS on lung cancer risk might become statistically significant if we had a larger sample size. We have tried other quantitative indicators for ETS exposure, including number of smokers at home and years of workplace exposure, but the associations with lung cancer were still not significant, and the effects on the estimated ORs for the categories of total cooking dish-years were minimum. Our exposure assessment for RRE was based on weighing variables of residential buildings that had been found to influence indoor radon levels in a prior territory wide survey (25) and might be inaccurate and imprecise, but the semiquantitative ranking used indicated a possible dose-response relationship with lung cancer risk (with greater ORs for higher quintiles ranging from 1.8 to 2.5), though the association was not statistically significant (see Appendix A).
As in most population-based case control studies, the selection of appropriate controls might be a concern. A participation rate of 50% was not high but not too low for this type of control. We managed to obtain some brief information from a group of the nonparticipating controls (n = 191). Comparisons with the participating controls showed that they were similar in age distribution, martial status, type of current housing, district of current residence, cooking history, and smoking history, suggesting that nonrespondent bias should not be serious. A lower proportion of the control subjects had never been employed. As individuals who had never been employed might cook more, the crude OR for cooking fumes exposure could be overestimated. However, the 7% difference in employment status between cases and controls could not entirely account for the 300% to >700% increase in risk associated with moderate to high levels of cooking. In fact, adjustment for employment status did not change the results substantially. On the other hand, the high comparability in other sociodemographic factors between cases and controls indicated that selection bias would be minor in our study (40, 41).
Recall bias should not distort our results to a great extent. We tried to minimize this bias by introducing the study to both the cases and the controls as a general "women health" study. Furthermore, the purported link between cooking fumes and lung cancer was not common knowledge, and subjects were asked to report the average number of dishes they cooked daily rather than their subjective feeling of smokiness during cooking. Thus, it was unlikely that cases would recall better, or overreport, their cooking practices than the controls. Inaccuracies in recall and reporting were possible and, as they were likely nondifferential, could cause dilution of a true association. We reinterviewed a subgroup of subjects (45 cases and 156 controls) after an interval of several weeks on their reported history of cooking practices in the most recent three residences, and good reproducibility was observed especially among the controls. 
for cooking status ranged between 0.7 and 1 for cases and between 0.98 and 1 for controls. for the use of exhaust fan/fume extractor was 0.88, 0.81, and 0.19 for cases in reverse chronological order and 0.92, 0.96, and 0.86 for controls. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient for meals cooked weekly, stir-frying dish-years, frying dish-years, and deep-frying dish-years, ranged between 0.61 and 0.9 for cases and between 0.85 and 0.96 for controls. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating the reliability of measurement for cooking fumes exposure.
It was difficult to estimate to what extent the association was distorted by interviewer bias; however, data from a special group of our study subjects (inpatients who had to undergo surgical operations for suspected lung cancer) suggested that this bias should not be serious. They were all handled as lung cancer cases during the interviews. The 39 subjects who eventually did not have primary lung cancer after the diagnostic workup reported much less exposures than the 75 confirmed cases. The reported mean cooking dish-years in these two subgroups closely approximated the means for controls and cases in the whole study. The differential exposure reported in these two subgroups did not support the presence of interviewer bias and recall bias and, hence, provided further support for a positive association between cooking fumes exposure and lung cancer.
There might also be misclassification of disease status. The control subjects could include patients with undiagnosed lung cancer. Such misclassification, if present, would dilute the true association between cooking fumes exposure and lung cancer. On the other hand, all cases were histologically or cytologically confirmed and misclassification would be unlikely.
We observed a 3- to 4-fold increased risk related to moderate levels of cooking (101-150 total cooking dish-years). This risk estimate was compatible with those reported in seven case-control studies conducted elsewhere among Chinese women, with ORs ranging from 1.9 to 2.6 for the group with the highest frequency of stir-frying, frying, or deep-frying (16, 18, 20–23, 28). Together with a nice dose-response relationship, our study provides further support to the hypothesis that carcinogens in cooking fumes play an important role in the occurrence of lung cancer among Chinese women in Hong Kong.
In conclusion, we found strong evidence that cumulative exposure to cooking by means of any form of frying could increase the risk of lung cancer in Hong Kong nonsmoking women. Practical means to reduce exposures to cooking fumes should be given top priority in future research.
|
Appendix A. Residential Radon Exposure |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionAppendix A. Residential Radon...References |
|---|
5 years), and window opening practices (most windows fully open all the time, most windows fully open only when family member(s) were at home, some windows open all the time, some windows open only when family member(s) were at home, and all windows closed tight all the time). Each exposure variable was scored using a three-point (floor level), four-point (building material and wall surface covering materials), or five-point scale (building age and window opening practices) according to the results of a territory-wide indoor radon survey in Hong Kong. The RRE index that measured lifetime RRE was generated from such information. A higher score indicated a higher level of RRE.
A lifetime weighed RRE index was calculated by the cumulative scores for all reported residences divided by the total number of years lived in those residences.
 |
For subjects who had missing values in one or more residences, the scores of other residences with valid data were contributed to the calculation of RRE index. If a subject provided complete information on all residences since birth, the denominator of the above formula would be the age of the subject.
The RRE was categorized into quintiles for examining its effect on lung cancer risk. A significant linear-by-linear association with lung cancer was found on univariate analysis with 2 test (P = 0.03), and a nonsignificant dose-response relationship was present on multiple logistic regression controlling for all potential confounding factors in the current study, with greater ORs for higher quintiles of RRE index (ranging from 1.8 to 2.5).
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 8/17/05. Revised 2/20/06. Accepted 3/ 1/06.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionAppendix A. Residential Radon...References |
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  X.-R. Wang, Y.-L. Chiu, H. Qiu, J. S. K. Au, and I. T.-S. Yu The roles of smoking and cooking emissions in lung cancer risk among Chinese women in Hong Kong Ann. Onc., April 1, 2009; 20(4): 746 - 751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. A. Tse, I. T.-s. Yu, J. S. K. Au, K. S. Yu, K. P. Kwok, H. Qiu, and T.-w. Wong Environmental Tobacco Smoke and Lung Cancer Among Chinese Nonsmoking Males: Might Adenocarcinoma Be the Culprit? Am. J. Epidemiol., March 1, 2009; 169(5): 533 - 541. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. J. Castro, C. V. Lohr, K. A. Fischer, K. M. Waters, B.-J. M. Webb-Robertson, R. H. Dashwood, G. S. Bailey, and D. E. Williams Identifying efficacious approaches to chemoprevention with chlorophyllin, purified chlorophylls and freeze-dried spinach in a mouse model of transplacental carcinogenesis Carcinogenesis, February 1, 2009; 30(2): 315 - 320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C.-H. Pan, C.-C. Chan, and K.-Y. Wu Effects on Chinese Restaurant Workers of Exposure to Cooking Oil Fumes: A Cautionary Note on Urinary 8-Hydroxy-2'-Deoxyguanosine Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2008; 17(12): 3351 - 3357. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Taylor, F. Najafi, and A. Dobson Meta-analysis of studies of passive smoking and lung cancer: effects of study type and continent Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2007; 36(5): 1048 - 1059. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Subramanian and R. Govindan Lung Cancer in Never Smokers: A Review J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2007; 25(5): 561 - 570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Minerva BMJ, May 20, 2006; 332(7551): 1222 - 1222. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |
