Cancer Research Meeting Calendar Frontiers in Basic Cancer Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Cancer Research 67, 326, January 1, 2007. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2363
© 2007 American Association for Cancer Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Persson, M.
Right arrow Articles by Carlsson, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Persson, M.
Right arrow Articles by Carlsson, J.

Experimental Therapeutics, Molecular Targets, and Chemical Biology

[177Lu]Pertuzumab: Experimental Therapy of HER-2–Expressing Xenografts

Mikael Persson1,2, Lars Gedda1,2, Hans Lundqvist1, Vladimir Tolmachev1, Hans Nordgren3, Per-Uno Malmström2 and Jörgen Carlsson1

Departments of 1 Biomedical Radiation Sciences, 2 Experimental Urology, and 3 Molecular and Morphological Pathology, Rudbeck Laboratory, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

Requests for reprints: Mikael Persson, Department of Biomedical Radiation Sciences, Rudbeck Laboratory, Uppsala University, SE-75185, Uppsala, Sweden. Phone: 46-18-4713829; Fax: 46-18-4713432; E-mail: mikael.persson{at}bms.uu.se or Jörgen Carlsson. Phone: 46-18-4713841; Fax: 46-18-4713432; E-mail: jorgen.carlsson{at}bms.uu.se.


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Pertuzumab (Omnitarg) is a novel antibody against HER-2, domain II. HER-2 is a tyrosine kinase receptor that is overexpressed in several carcinomas, especially breast cancer. Pertuzumab, labeled with the low-energy ß emitter 177Lu, might be a candidate for targeted radiotherapy of disseminated HER-2–positive micrometastases. The radiolabeled antibody [177Lu]pertuzumab showed favorable targeting properties in BALB/c (nu/nu) mice with HER-2–overexpressing xenografts. The absorbed dose in tumors was more than five times higher than the absorbed dose in blood and more than seven times the absorbed dose in any other normal organ. Experimental therapy showed that [177Lu]pertuzumab delayed tumor progression compared with controls (no treatment, P < 0.0001; nonlabeled pertuzumab antibody, P < 0.0001; and 177Lu-labeled irrelevant antibody, P < 0.01). No adverse side effects of the treatment could be detected. Thus, the experimental results support the planning of clinical studies applying [177Lu]pertuzumab for therapy. [Cancer Res 2007;67(1):326–31]


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The basic characteristics of [177Lu]pertuzumab, a radioactive labeled monoclonal antibody binding to HER-2, have recently been described (1). The high SKOV-3 xenograft radionuclide uptake compared with other organs encouraged us to do experimental therapy using the same animal model.

HER-2, or ErbB2, is a transmembrane receptor-like protein, which is part of the HER family of tyrosine kinase receptors (2, 3). HER-2 is unique in this family because it has no known ligand but seems to be constitutively open to dimerization (whereas other members of the receptor family have to be stimulated by a ligand; ref. 4). HER-2 has been found to be the preferred partner for heterodimerizations with the other HER family members, and this may be the main reason for the oncogenicity of HER-2 (5). Pertuzumab (rhuMab 2C4) is designed to bind to the dimerization domain (domain II) of HER-2 and sterically hinder heterodimerization or homodimerization (6, 7). The antibody has been found safe and clinically active in a recently published phase I clinical trial (8).

HER-2 is most commonly known to be overexpressed in cancers of the breast, especially in cancers with bone metastases (9, 10), but has also been reported to be overexpressed in bladder cancer (11) and, to some extent, in cancers of the ovaries (12) and gastric region (13).

Different radionuclides can be used for targeted radionuclide therapy. We have selected the low-energy ß emitter 177Lu, which has a spectrum of emitted ß energies suitable for targeting of micrometastases (14, 15). The CHX-pertuzumab complex gives a chelate-mediated binding of 177Lu. Micrometastases, not detectable at the time of primary tumor treatment, often cause tumor relapse. We hope that the application of [177Lu]pertuzumab in an adjuvant setting can help alleviate this problem.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cell line, chemicals, equipment, and abbreviations. All experiments were done using the SKOV-3 cell line (ATCC HTB 77). The cells were cultivated in 25-, 75-, or 175-cm2 {Delta}flasks (Nunc, Wiesbaden, Germany) using HAM's F-10 medium complemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), 2 mmol/L L-glutamine, and 100 IU/mL penicillin/streptavidin (Biochrom, Berlin, Germany).

Omnitarg was a kind gift from Genentech (South San Francisco, CA). The antibody pertuzumab was purified by size-exclusion chromatography of the Omnitarg preparation using MilliQ-water as eluent on a PD-10 column (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden). The purified antibody was freeze-dried in a Heto FD 3 (Heto, Holten, Denmark) overnight. Isothiocyanate-benzyl-CHX-A''-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) was purchased from Macrocyclics (Dallas, TX). Gamma counting was done using an automated well crystal scintillator (Wallac Wizard 1480 3'', Perkin-Elmer, Wellesley, MA) within an energy window of 30 to 340 keV. Instant TLC SG strips were purchased from Gelman Sciences (Ann Arbor, MI) and were analyzed using a cyclone phosphor-imaging system (Perkin-Elmer).

The chimeric monoclonal antibody cMAb U36 against CD44v6 was used as negative control because SKOV-3 does not express CD44v6 in detectable amounts. The selection, production, and purification of the antibody have been described previously (16–18). The antibody was a kind gift from Prof. van Dongen (Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Vrije University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands).

Samples for histology were dehydrated in a Ventana vacuum-infiltrating processing (Dalab, Sweden) using an 11-step program with increasing concentrations of ethanol, followed by xylene, and paraffin treatment. The samples were embedded in paraffin using a Tissue-Tec TEC embedding machine (Sakura Finetek, Tokyo, Japan) and cut in a Leica RM2165 Microtome (Leica, Leipzig, Germany).

177Lu was purchased from NRG (Petten, The Netherlands).

Animals. Xenografts were formed by s.c. inoculation in the right posterior leg of BALB/c (nu/nu) mice (M&B, Ry, Denmark) injecting (5-7) x 106 cells in 100 µL medium. The experiments comply with current Swedish law and were done with permission from the Uppsala committee of animal research ethics.

Labeling. Conjugation and labeling was done according to previously described and optimized protocols (1, 19). Briefly, the antibodies (60 nmol/L) were incubated overnight with isothiocyanate-benzyl-CHX-A''-DTPA (130 nmol/L) in 0.07 mol/L borate buffer (pH 9.2). The conjugated antibodies were purified on a NAP-5 column (GE Healthcare), and the buffer was changed to metal-free 1 mol/L sodium acetate buffer with 5 mg/mL ascorbic acid (pH 5.6). Chelation to 177Lu was done for 30 min to 1 h, and the chelated products were purified from free 177Lu on NAP-5 columns with PBS (pH 7.2) as running buffer. Radiochemical purity after purification was >99% according to instant TLC (SG plates) with 0.2 mol/L citric acid buffer. The specific activity after labeling was 22 MBq/mg for the biodistribution study with [177Lu]pertuzumab. For the tumor treatment study, the specific activities were 200 MBq/mg for [177Lu]pertuzumab and 300 MBq/mg for [177Lu]U36.

Biodistribution. Xenografts were allowed to grow to a size of ~5 mm diameter before [177Lu]pertuzumab was injected i.v. into the tail vein of the mice. Four animals were sacrificed at each time point, and a panel of organs (Table 1 ) was collected for gamma counting. Euthanasia was done by an overdose of anesthesia (ketamin and xylazin) followed by exsanguination. The mice tails and empty injection syringes were also collected and measured to assess the amount of radioactivity released in the bloodstream after injection. Calibration was made against a set of three standards. The results are given as % injected dose/gram in Fig. 1 . In Table 1, the results are given as standard uptake values (SUV) calculated by the formula: SUV = (Ao x mm) / (Am x mo), where Ao is the number of radioactive counts per minute (cpm) in the studied organ, mm is the weight (g) of the mouse, Am is the total cpm value for the mouse, and mo is the weight (g) of the studied organ. SUV >1 denotes accumulation in that organ.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 1. Biodistribution of 177Lu in BALB/c (nu/nu) mice carrying SKOV-3 xenografts with an approximate diameter of 0.5 cm and injected with [177Lu]pertuzumab

 

Figure 1
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Figure 1. Biodistribution of 177Lu in the organs of primary interest in SKOV-3 xenograft-carrying BALB/c (nu/nu) mice injected with [177Lu]pertuzumab. Mice were sacrificed at 8 h, 1, 3, 5, 7, or 14 d after injection, and a panel of organs, including blood drawn from the heart, was collected, weighed, and analyzed for radioactive content. Mean, half-life corrected, percent injected activity per gram, and SE from four mice in each point is presented. A, comparison between 177Lu uptake in blood and tumor. B, 177Lu uptake in organs, which are known to accumulate, at least to a limited extent, HER-2 binding substances or free lutetium or to show uptake for other reasons. C, uptake of 177Lu in organs involved in the elimination or processing of antibodies. For easy comparison of data, the blood curve is also shown in (B) and (C).

 
Gamma camera imaging. Static images with a gamma camera were collected as described in Persson et. al (1) and will only be described briefly here. Two mice were injected i.v. with 2 MBq [177Lu]pertuzumab (0.3 pmol). After 3 days, the mice were killed and imaged for 600 s with a gamma camera [Millennium VG with a 5/8'' NaI(Tl) crystal, General Electric Medical Systems, Haifa, Israel] equipped with a pinhole collimator [MEGP (VPC5), zoom factor 2.0]. Data from the two set energy windows (113 keV ± 10% and 208 keV ± 10%) were added together and presented as a 256 x 256 matrix.

Dosimetry. The organ uptake values, non-corrected for physical half-life, were time integrated to obtain the residence time per gram tissue for dosimetry calculations. Integration between time 0 and 14 days was made by the trapezoid method. The two last time points were fitted to a single exponential function, which was used to estimate the residence time from 14 days to infinity. The extrapolated area was in all organs <18% of the total calculated area.

The mean uptake values and their SDs given in Table 1 were used to randomly generate new statistically normally distributed uptake values. These new sets of uptake values were time integrated in the same way as described above. This produced a set of 30 randomly distributed residence time values. The relative error (1 relative SD) in this data set was used as the relative error of the calculated absorbed dose in the organ.

The radioactive decay of 177Lu produces mainly low energy ß particles. S values for 177Lu were obtained from RADAR phantoms (Unit Density Spheres) published on the Internet.4 The S value for a 1 g sphere (0.0233 mGy/MBq s) was used to calculate the organ doses by multiplying it to the organ residence values.

Tumor treatment. The agents for tumor treatment were given i.v. in tail vein 7 days after xenograft inoculation. The study was a semi-randomized blind setup. Groups of mice were randomly selected for one of five treatments: 7 MBq [177Lu]pertuzumab (n = 8 mice), 5 MBq [177Lu]pertuzumab (n = 8 mice), 7 MBq [177Lu]U36 (unspecific control, n = 7 mice), native pertuzumab (non-labeled antibody control, n = 9 mice), and PBS (vehicle, n = 8 mice). After injection, the key was sealed in an envelope, keeping the identity of the groups secret until after the data analysis.

The mice were weighed, and tumor sizes were measured two to three times per week. The tumor size measurement was done using an electronic slide caliper. The tumor volume was calculated using an ellipsoid estimation of tumor form. The mice were followed until their tumors reached a volume of ~1 cm3 before they were euthanized and dissected. Dissection consisted of removal of tumor for final volume measurement (length, breadth, and depth) and removal of kidneys for analysis of possible renal damage. When mice had to be euthanized due to tumor size, their tumor size was at all later times considered to be 1 cm3.

Survival curve plots and Kaplan-Meier analysis were done using Prism 4 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). The end point was a tumor volume reaching 0.5 cm3. Mice removed from the study due to other reasons than having reached the end point were censored. The study was, for the remaining animals, finished after 102 days at which time they were censored. Euthanasia was done with an overdose of anesthesia (ketamin and xylazin) followed by cervical dislocation.

Histology. Tumors and kidneys were fixed in 4% phosphate-buffered formalin, processed, and embedded in paraffin. From selected blocks, 4-µm-thick sections were cut, put on coated slides (Superfrost plus, Menzel-Gläser, Germany), and dried for 12 h at 37°C. The sections were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated through graded concentrations of ethanol to distilled water.

The kidney slices were then stained with H&E.

The tumor slices were treated with hydrogen peroxide doped PBS for 10 min to quench endogenous peroxidase. Retrieval was preformed by pressure boiling the samples in citrate buffer for 7 min. The samples were stained for HER-2 with the A0485 antibody (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark). Antibody dilutions 1:300 and 1:900 were applied, and the samples were incubated in 4°C overnight. After rinsing, the samples are treated with one drop EnVision antibody (DAKO) per sample and incubated for 45 min in room temperature. The samples were rinsed again and then developed using Fexin plus (DAKO) for 15 min.


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Biodistribution
The uptake of [177Lu]pertuzumab was low in most organs as can be seen in Table 1 and Fig. 1A to C. The radioactivity concentration, expressed as percent injected activity per gram organ, was always below 8% for all normal organs, excluding blood. The tumor uptake values were at all times higher than the values in normal organs, including blood. The SUV were below 1.8 for all normal organs, excluding blood. This concentration decreased with time in all organs, excluding the tumor xenografts, which continued to accumulate radioactivity until 5 days after injection. The accumulation of radioactivity in the tumor combined with decreasing activity concentration in other organs leads to a nuclide half-life corrected tumor-to-blood ratio starting at 1.4 at 8 hours after injection and continually increasing to a maximum of 19 after 2 weeks.

Gamma Camera Imaging
The gamma camera images collected 3 days after injection are shown in Fig. 2 . The tumors accumulated large amounts of 177Lu. Small amounts of radioactivity could also be found in the liver area. A region of interest analysis of the tumor and corresponding lateral region gave a tumor to background ratio of 29 for the left mouse and 24 for the right mouse.


Figure 2
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Figure 2. Gamma camera images of mice injected with [177Lu]pertuzumab 3 d after injection. Note the extensive uptake in the tumors. The mice contours were obtained from digital camera images collected at the time of gamma camera analysis. A color version of the image has previously been published in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (1), and the image is used with kind permission from Springer Science and Business Media.

 
Dosimetry
The dosimetry calculations indicated that the absorbed dose to the tumor would, in our case, be at least five times the dose given to blood. For other normal organs, the situation was even better. Calculated absorbed doses to selected organs are presented in Table 2 .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 2. Doses to organs in different treatment groups

 
Weight Measurements
No groups of mice showed any significant weight loss after injection. The only exception was one individual mouse in the native pertuzumab group (see below). The weight gain that could be discerned did not vary between the groups.

Tumor Treatment
Tumor growth. The tumor growth did not vary between groups until 25 days after xenograft inoculation (18 days after treatment start), but as can be seen in Fig. 3 , the groups that received PBS and native antibody then experienced a rapid tumor growth during an additional period of ~25 days. The mice with tumors that reached the size of about 1 cm3 were sacrificed. The growth of tumors treated with radioactivity (targeted with pertuzumab antibody or non-targeted with U36 antibody) was slower, but only the tumors that received radioactivity targeted via pertuzumab delivery showed a clear delay in tumor growth (Fig. 3).


Figure 3
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Figure 3. Mean volume of tumors in each treatment group as a function of time. Each treatment group consisted of seven to nine mice (see text for details).

 
Kaplan-Meier analysis. The result from the Kaplan-Meier analysis is shown in Fig. 4 . The end point criterion was tumors growing ≥0.5 cm3. This end point was selected because it was noticed that after reaching 0.5 cm3, tumors grew exponentially. Most mice (31 of 40) reached the end point, but nine mice did not: six of these mice had still not reached the end point at the end of the experiment, three in the 7 MBq [177Lu]pertuzumab group, two in the 5 MBq [177Lu]pertuzumab group, and one in the 7 MBq [177Lu]U36 group. The [177Lu]U36-treated mouse had no obvious xenograft take. One mouse from the 7 MBq [177Lu]pertuzumab group was killed at day 100 due to large apparent tumor size, but at dissection, it was discovered that the tumor was rather small. Instead, most of the apparent volume was formed by a large reservoir of fluid, possibly an inflammatory process. This tumor was considered to not have reached the end point. All these mice were censored.


Figure 4
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Figure 4. Kaplan-Meier plots showing the tumor progression of BALB/c (nu/nu) mice with SKOV-3 xenografts. The end point is tumor growth to a size ≥0.5 cm3. Each treatment group consisted of seven to nine mice (see text for details). A, Kaplan-Meier plot of individual treatment groups. B, Kaplan-Meier plot where all three controls and both groups receiving [177Lu]pertuzumab have been pooled.

 
One mouse in the native pertuzumab group had to be removed from the study after 28 days due to weight loss. This mouse did not receive radioactivity, and the weight loss was probably due to stress or illness. One mouse from the 5 MBq [177Lu]pertuzumab group was killed at day 72 due to tumor necrosis that spread to the dermis, causing open wounds. Both of these mice were censored. Open wounds were also observed in a few other mice but only after they reached the end point tumor volume of 0.5 cm3.

The obtained tumor take values corresponded well to previous experiences with this model system where the tumor takes have been ~90% to 95% (data not shown).

Analysis of survival with Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the group that received 7 MBq [177Lu]pertuzumab had a significantly improved time to tumor progression versus mice that received PBS, native pertuzumab, or 7 MBq [177Lu]U36 (P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001, and P < 0.01, respectively). Mice receiving 5 MBq [177Lu]pertuzumab had a significantly longer time to tumor progression than mice that received PBS or native pertuzumab (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0005, respectively).

Histology
No morphologic damage was detectable in sections of either irradiated or nonirradiated kidneys, neither in a blind or open examination. The tumor cells, analyzed in tissue sections, were found to express HER-2 whether treated or not. Treated tumors seemed, morphologically, somewhat more chaotic than untreated, showing large heterogeneity with partial degradation, fibrotic regions, and lymphocyte infiltration.


   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
The biodistribution study was designed to give information on both early and late kinetics (uptake, retention, and clearance) to allow for dosimetry calculations. The results from the biodistribution study showed that the tumor uptake of [177Lu] was higher than the uptake in all analyzed normal organs and in blood. Furthermore, the low radioactivity concentration in bone indicated that the lutetium was not lost from the chelator in vivo because free lutetium is a known bone "seeker" (20). The residence times in the tumors were high, as could be expected from our previously published retention studies (1). The tumor-to-blood ratio increased from about 1.4, 8 h after injection, up to about 19 after 2 weeks, which is a promising result.

The simplified dosimetry calculation used in this article, which do not include ß crossfire and photon contribution, is motivated by the local absorption of the low-energy ß particles and the low abundance of photons and other penetrating radiations in the 177Lu decay. Thus, the main uncertainty in the dose calculations is not due this simplified model but rather due to the variation in kinetic data. The data show that the absorbed dose to the tumor is dominant to all normal organs.

For many radiolabeled antibodies used in targeted therapy, the critical organ usually is the red bone marrow due to crossfire from radioactivity in the blood. Because blood in our study is the organ that is obtaining the highest absorbed dose besides the tumor, one may suspect that bone marrow, also in targeting therapy with [177Lu]pertuzumab, is the critical organ. However, the generally accepted coupling factor (red marrow-to-blood activity concentration ratio) is 0.36 (21). Because the absorbed dose tumor-to-blood ratio is ~5, the expected tumor-to-bone marrow ratio would be 14, which is still an advantageous factor and indicate a possibility to obtain good therapy results.

The goal of clinical treatment with [177Lu]pertuzumab is primarily to eliminate micrometastases not visible at the time of surgery. With this in mind, [177Lu]pertuzumab was, in the experimental therapy experiments, given 7 days after xenograft inoculation. The xenografts had time to establish but not to grow into a detectable solid tumor.

The tumor growth curves were most retarded in the groups that received radioactivity targeted with pertuzumab, which of course is promising for the planning for clinical therapy trials on HER-2–overexpressing tumors. Furthermore, no groups of mice showed any significant weight loss after injection, indicating no major acute toxicity from the antibodies and/or the radiation.

To facilitate statistical analysis of the treatments, a survival curve analysis of Kaplan-Meier type was done. This analysis showed that the group that received 7 MBq [177Lu]pertuzumab had a significantly increased time to tumor progression in relation to the controls. Mice receiving 5 MBq [177Lu]pertuzumab also had a significantly longer time to tumor progression than mice that received PBS or native pertuzumab. Thus, the HER-2–specific radionuclide therapy proved more efficient than not HER-2–specific treatments.

However, although the time to tumor progression was significantly improved using HER-2–targeted radiotherapy, only two of all HER-2–targeted mice did not resume tumor progression. Immunohistology of sections from these two tumors showed presence of HER-2 in the remaining tissue, but because no tumor growth was observed in these cases, the HER-2–positive tumor cells seemed unable to divide.

We believe that the therapy could be improved further by using higher amounts of [177Lu]pertuzumab. It is probable that the maximum tolerated doses have not been reached in this study. This is also indicated because no adverse effects could be found by the treatment. The obtained therapy results are encouraging, especially considering that the transplanted SKOV-3 cells have been reported to be radioresistant (22).

The results showed that [177Lu]pertuzumab can be used as an agent for HER-2–targeted radionuclide therapy in vivo. We believe that the optimal use for [177Lu]pertuzumab would be in an adjuvant setting when there are strong indications of metastatic spread of tumor cells. We are currently planning studies of radionuclide uptake, when applying [177Lu]pertuzumab in clinical phase I/II studies on breast and urinary bladder cancers overexpressing HER-2.


   Acknowledgments
 
Grant support: The Swedish Cancer Society.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

We thank Veronica Asplund Eriksson for technical support, Genentech for the generous gift of Omnitarg, and Marika Nestor and Prof. Gus van Dongen for their kind donation of the control antibody U36.


   Footnotes
 
4 http://www.doseinfo-radar.com/RADARphan.html. Back

Received 6/28/06. Revised 8/30/06. Accepted 10/12/06.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Persson M, Tolmachev V, Andersson K, et al. [(177)Lu]pertuzumab: experimental studies on targeting of HER-2 positive tumour cells. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2005;32:1457–62.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Casalini P, Iorio MV, Galmozzi E, et al. Role of HER receptors family in development and differentiation. J Cell Physiol 2004;200:343–50.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Marmor MD, Skaria KB, Yarden Y. Signal transduction and oncogenesis by ErbB/HER receptors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004;58:903–13.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Cho HS, Mason K, Ramyar KX, et al. Structure of the extracellular region of HER2 alone and in complex with the Herceptin Fab. Nature 2003;421:756–60.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Hudelist G, Singer CF, Manavi M, et al. Co-expression of ErbB-family members in human breast cancer: Her-2/neu is the preferred dimerization candidate in nodal-positive tumors. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2003;80:353–61.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Badache A, Hynes NE. A new therapeutic antibody masks ErbB2 to its partners. Cancer Cell 2004;5:299–301.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Adams CW, Allison DE, Flagella K, et al. Humanization of a recombinant monoclonal antibody to produce a therapeutic HER dimerization inhibitor, pertuzumab. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2006;55:717–27.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Agus DB, Gordon MS, Taylor C, et al. Phase I clinical study of pertuzumab, a novel HER dimerization inhibitor, in patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:2534–43.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Menard S, Casalini P, Campiglio M, et al. Role of HER2/neu in tumor progression and therapy. Cell Mol Life Sci 2004;61:2965–78.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Carlsson J, Nordgren H, Sjostrom J, et al. HER2 expression in breast cancer primary tumours and corresponding metastases. Original data and literature review. Br J Cancer 2004;90:2344–8.[Medline]
  11. Gardmark T, Wester K, De la Torre M, et al. Analysis of HER2 expression in primary urinary bladder carcinoma and corresponding metastases. BJU Int 2005;95:982–6.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Tewari KS, Kyshtoobayeva AS, Mehta RS, et al. Biomarker conservation in primary and metastatic epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2000;78:130–6.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Rebischung C, Barnoud R, Stefani L, et al. The effectiveness of trastuzumab (Herceptin) combined with chemotherapy for gastric carcinoma with overexpression of the c-erbB-2 protein. Gastric Cancer 2005;8:249–52.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Carlsson J, Forssell Aronsson E, Hietala SO, et al. Tumour therapy with radionuclides: assessment of progress and problems. Radiother Oncol 2003;66:107–17.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Bernhardt P, Benjegard SA, Kolby L, et al. Dosimetric comparison of radionuclides for therapy of somatostatin receptor-expressing tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001;51:514–24.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Schrijvers AH, Quak JJ, Uyterlinde AM, et al. MAb U36, a novel monoclonal antibody successful in immunotargeting of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer Res 1993;53:4383–90.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Brakenhoff RH, van Gog FB, Looney JE, et al. Construction and characterization of the chimeric monoclonal antibody E48 for therapy of head and neck cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother 1995;40:191–200.[Medline]
  18. Nestor M, Persson M, Cheng J, et al. Biodistribution of the chimeric monoclonal antibody U36 radioiodinated with a closo-dodecaborate-containing linker. Comparison with other radioiodination methods. Bioconjug Chem 2003;14:805–10.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Mizradeh S, Brechbiel MW, Atcher RW, et al. Radiometal Labeling of Immunoproteins: covalent linkage of 2-(4-isothiocyanato-benzyl) diethylene-triamine-pentaacetic acid ligands to Immunoglobulin. Bioconjug Chem 1990;1:59–65.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Schmitt A, Bernhardt P, Nilsson O, et al. Biodistribution and dosimetry of 177Lu-labeled [DOTA0,Tyr3]octreotate in male nude mice with human small cell lung cancer. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2003;18:593–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Sgouros G. Bone marrow dosimetry for radioimmunotherapy: theoretical considerations. J Nucl Med 1993;34:689–94.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Petru E, Sevin BU, Gottlieb C. Radiosensitivity patterns of four human ovarian cancer cell lines in vitro. Gynecol Oncol 1997;64:490–2.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
V. Tolmachev, A. Orlova, R. Pehrson, J. Galli, B. Baastrup, K. Andersson, M. Sandstrom, D. Rosik, J. Carlsson, H. Lundqvist, et al.
Radionuclide Therapy of HER2-Positive Microxenografts Using a 177Lu-Labeled HER2-Specific Affibody Molecule
Cancer Res., March 15, 2007; 67(6): 2773 - 2782.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Persson, M.
Right arrow Articles by Carlsson, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Persson, M.
Right arrow Articles by Carlsson, J.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online