| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Cell, Tumor, and Stem Cell Biology |
Departments of 1 Medicine and Genetics, 2 Biochemistry and Biophysics, and 3 Neurology and 4 Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, The Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; 5 Department of Adult Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School; and 6 Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Requests for reprints: Norman E. Sharpless, Departments of Medicine and Genetics, The Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina School of Medicine, CB# 7295, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7295. Phone: 919-966-1185; Fax: 919-966-8212; E-mail: nes{at}med.unc.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Ink4 family of cdk inhibitors consists of four members [p16Ink4a (2), p15Ink4b (3), p18Ink4c (4), and p19Ink4d (5)], and all are specific inhibitors of cdk4/6-cyclin D complexes. Both p16Ink4a and p15Ink4b consist of four ankyrin repeats, with
80% sequence similarity to each other, whereas p18Ink4c and p19Ink4d have a fifth ankryin repeat (reviewed in ref. 6). All four inhibit cdk4 and cdk6 by binding opposite the cyclin binding site, causing an allosteric shift and blocking cyclin binding and ATP hydrolysis (7, 8). Although there have been some reported differences in the regulation of different Ink4s (9–11), they seem to bind cdk4 and cdk6 with comparable affinity (12). In general, distinct roles for these proteins in vivo have not been delineated, although p16Ink4a in particular has been associated with senescence and tumor suppression (reviewed in ref. 13).
Despite the biochemical similarities, mice lacking individual Ink4 genes exhibit different phenotypes. Mice lacking p19Ink4d mice are overtly normal but have testicular atrophy and deafness (14, 15). Mice lacking p15Ink4b show increased proliferation in the lymphoid lineages and a low incidence of spontaneous tumor formation (16). On the other hand, both p16Ink4a–/– (17–19) and p18Ink4c–/– (16, 20) mice exhibit increased susceptibility to spontaneous and carcinogen-induced tumors, but with minimal overlap of tumor spectrum. Mice lacking p16Ink4a develop spontaneous lymphomas and sarcomas at low penetrance, whereas the majority of p18Ink4c–/– mice develop pituitary tumors of the intermediate lobe, suggesting different in vivo roles for these proteins.
Elucidation of the control of the proliferative cdks by the partially redundant cdk inhibitors remains a major hurdle in the clear understanding of the cell cycle, a problem made more difficult by the compensation seen among family members. In this study, we have investigated the effects of combined loss of p16Ink4a and p18Ink4c in vitro and in vivo. We show that in murine embryo fibroblasts (MEF), the loss of p18Ink4c results in compensatory increases in p16Ink4a, whereas loss of p16Ink4a is associated with increased expression of p15Ink4b. In vivo, the loss of p18Ink4c results in compensatory increases in p16Ink4a in various organs, which restrains proliferation. Additionally, using genetic and pharmacologic approaches, we show that specific in vivo compartments in the adult mouse are exquisitely dependent on cdk4/6 kinase activity for proliferation. These data suggest that p16Ink4a and p18Ink4c function to regulate physiologic and aberrant proliferation in specific compartments of adult mice.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MEFs were cultured from whole 13.5-day-old embryos as described (18) and grown at 21%O2, 5% CO2. Cumulative population doublings were calculated as Log2 (number of cells at harvest/number of cells plated). Transformations with H-RasV12G and SV40 TAg and high-density seeding assays were done as previously described (22) with duplicate samples from four to six lines of each genotype.
Western blotting and immunoprecipitation kinase assays. Western blot assays were done as described (19). Antibodies against p21Cip1 (F-8, Santa Cruz), p16Ink4a (M-156, Santa Cruz), actin (C-1, Santa Cruz), cyclin D1 (DCS-6, Cell Signaling), cyclin E (M-20, Santa Cruz), cdk2 (M2, Santa Cruz), and cdk4 (C-22, Santa Cruz) are commercially available. Antibodies to p15Ink4b, p18Ink4c, and p27Kip1 have been previously described (20). Antibody against p19Ink4d was raised against a COOH-terminal peptide, and affinity was purified.
Kinase assays were done on MEFs as described (23), with some modifications. Briefly, fresh cells were lysed for 45 min at 4°C in NP40 buffer [50 mmol/L Tris (pH 7.5), 150 mmol/L NaCl, 0.5% NP40, phosphatase inhibitor cocktail I and II (Calbiochem)]; 100 µg (cdk2) or 900 µg (cdk4) total protein was immunoprecipitated with antibodies specified above. Lysates were precleared twice with 50 µL protein A agarose beads and immunoprecipitated for 12 h at 4°C. Beads were rinsed thrice with cold NP40 buffer, then twice with cold kinase assay buffer [50 mmol/L HEPES (pH 7.0), 10 mmol/L MgCl2, 5 mmol/L MnCl2, 1 mmol/L DTT, 5 µmol/L ATP]. Reactions were done in 30 µL kinase buffer with 5 µCi [
-32P]ATP (3,000 Ci/mmol) and 1 µL GST-Rb substrate (Santa Cruz, Rb769). Reactions were carried out for 30 min at 30°C. SDS sample buffer was then added; lysates were boiled for 3 min; and protein was separated on 12.5% bis-acrylamide gels.
Immunohistochemistry. Assistance in sample processing was provided by the University of North Carolina Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease. Paraffin samples from indicated genetic backgrounds were stained in a uniform fashion using well-established methods within the clinical laboratory at the Brigham and Women's Hospital Pathology Immunohistochemical laboratory. Briefly, five micron sections were cut, and immunohistochemical staining for either Ki-67 (rabbit polyclonal, NCL-Ki67p, Novocastra), adrenocorticorticotropic hormone (ACTH; DAKO, N1531), prolactin (PRL; DAKO, N1549), growth hormone (GHR; DAKO, L1814), leutinizing hormone (LH; DAKO, L1827), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH; DAKO, L1810), B220 (BD Biosciences/PharMingen, 557390), or CD3 (Serotec, MCA1477) was done using highly sensitive DAKO EnVision polymerized horseradish peroxidase detection methods. The proliferative index of the pituitary was calculated by counting only the cells in the intermediate pituitary: (total Ki67 + cells) / (total intermediate pituitary cells). The islet proliferative index was calculated on a per-islet basis as (total Ki67 + islet cells) / (total number of islet cells) per islet for each sample.
Taqman real-time PCR. Expression of mRNA was analyzed by quantitative Taqman real-time PCR as previously described, with some modifications (24). Reactions were carried out using cDNA equivalent to 80 ng RNA and done in triplicate for each sample. 18S rRNA was used as a loading control for all reactions. Primer sets for 18S (Hs99999901_s1), p15Ink4b (Mm00483241_m1), p18Ink4c (Mm00483243_m1), p19Ink4d (Mm00486943_m1), p21Cip1 (Mm00432448_m1), and p27Kip1 (Mm00438167_g1) were purchased from Applied Biosystems; p16Ink4a and p19Arf primers were designed as previously described (25).
Statistics. Analysis of Kaplan-Meier survival curves was done using the log-rank test for each genotype pair. Proliferative index and islet size were not distributed normally and, therefore, were compared using a nonparametric (Mann-Whitney) test. High-density seeding was evaluated using the Student's unpaired t test. All error bars represent SE.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
We additionally examined the effects of Ink4 deficiency on other aspects of MEF behavior in vitro. Growth arrest to high density in MEFs is partially mediated by p16Ink4a (22), but a role for p18Ink4c has not been explored. We assessed the ability of p18Ink4c to cooperate with p16Ink4a loss in the regulation of high-density growth. Plates were re-fed but not passaged for 21 days and then assessed for cell number. Compared with wild-type cells, p16Ink4a–/–;p18Ink4c–/– MEFs showed a 45% increase in cell number (P = 0.011; data not shown), comparable to the effect seen with loss of p16Ink4a alone (22). As has been previously reported for p16Ink4a–/– (18, 22) and p18Ink4c–/– (16) MEFs, transformation by H-rasV12G alone or H-RasV12G + SV40 T-Ag was not significantly different between wild-type, p16Ink4a–/–, p18Ink4c–/–, or p16Ink4a–/–;p18Ink4c–/– MEFs (data not shown). These data confirm an effect of p16Ink4a on density arrest in MEFs but suggest only at most a modest role for p16Ink4a and p18Ink4c in resisting Ras-mediated transformation in MEFs.
p16Ink4a–/–;p18Ink4c–/– mice develop aggressive pituitary tumors. To analyze the effects of combined p16Ink4a and p18Ink4c deficiency in vivo, we generated mice lacking p16Ink4a and/or p18Ink4c. Both p16Ink4a and p18Ink4c lie on the murine chromosome 4, requiring a modified breeding scheme similar to that reported for mice lacking p15Ink4b and p18Ink4c (16). p16Ink4a–/–;p18Ink4c–/– mice were produced in the expected ratio based on calculated frequency of recombination between p16Ink4a and p18Ink4c, were fertile, and exhibited normal behavior. No significant difference in body weight was found between p16Ink4a–/–;p18Ink4c–/– and wild-type or p16Ink4a+/–;p18Ink4c+/– mice in this mixed genetic background. With aging, p16Ink4a–/–;p18Ink4c–/– mice showed increased morbidity with a median tumor-free survival of 42.7 weeks, compared with 68.8 weeks for p18Ink4c–/– mice (P < 0.001) and >70 weeks for p16Ink4a–/– mice (P = 0.005; Fig. 2A ), showing strong cooperation between loss of p16Ink4a and p18Ink4c in promoting tumorigenesis.
|
50% penetrance by 1 year. No pituitary tumors were found in p16Ink4a–/– mice at any age examined. p16Ink4a–/–;p18Ink4c–/– mice developed non-pituitary tumors (e.g., lymphomas and sarcomas) at a comparable frequency to that of p16Ink4a–/– mice (data not shown), suggesting that cooperation between p16Ink4a and p18Ink4c in tumor suppression was most marked in the pituitary. Although this observation is in accord with previous findings showing an important anticancer role of cdk4/6 regulation in tumorigenesis of the intermediate pituitary (20, 30), loss of p18Ink4c combined with loss of p15Ink4b (16) or p19Ink4d (28) did not appreciably accelerate pituitary formation nor increase incidence, suggesting that p16Ink4a plays a predominant role in the prevention of pituitary tumorigenesis in p18Ink4c–/– mice.
In an effort to understand the basis of this cooperation, we did gross, histologic, and molecular analysis of age-matched wild-type, p16Ink4a–/–, p18Ink4c–/–, and p16Ink4a–/–;p18Ink4c–/– mice. Inspection of pituitaries of 35-week-old mice revealed normal macroscopic and microscopic structure in wild-type and p16Ink4a–/– mice (Fig. 2C). Consistent with previous data (20), p18Ink4c–/– mice at this age showed hyperplasia of the intermediate lobe with modest associated disruption of the gland architecture. However, p16Ink4a–/–;p18Ink4c–/– mice showed a marked increase in the size of the pituitary and anatomic disarray of the intermediate lobe with near complete effacement of the posterior lobe (Fig. 2C). Similar to cdk4R24C knock-in mice (30), cystic degeneration, hemorrhage, and necrosis were commonly seen in the pituitaries of p16Ink4a–/–;p18Ink4c–/– mice, even in animals less than 20 weeks of age, but were rarely seen in p18Ink4c–/– mice. Pituitary tumors in p16Ink4a–/–;p18Ink4c–/– mice stained strongly for ACTH, but not for other peptide hormones (PRL, GH, LH, or FSH) made in the pituitary (Fig. 2D), suggesting tumors were of the adrenocorticotroph lineage. Additionally, blood serum levels of
-MSH increased with age in p16Ink4a–/–;p18Ink4c–/– mice (Supplementary Fig. S1), as was reported for Rb+/– mice (31). These data suggest that p16Ink4a serves to limit tumor progression in the intermediate pituitary of p18Ink4c–/– mice.
p16Ink4a functionally compensates for p18Ink4c loss in the pituitary. To determine the functional consequences of combined p16Ink4a and p18Ink4c loss, we determined the Ki67 proliferative index in the intermediate lobe of the pituitary in adult mice. The intermediate lobes of the pituitary in 35-week-old wild-type, p16Ink4a–/–, p18Ink4c–/–, and p16Ink4a–/–;p18Ink4c–/– mice were compared. The rate of proliferation was comparable in wild-type (0.4%) and p16Ink4a–/– (0.5%) mice but significantly increased in p18Ink4c–/– mice (1.9%, P < 0.05 for both pairwise comparisons). Mice lacking both p16Ink4a and p18Ink4c showed an even greater increase in proliferation (2.7%) above wild-type (P = 0.003), p16Ink4a–/– (P < 0.001), and p18Ink4c–/– mice (P = 0.09; Fig. 3A ). This result suggests that the increase in p16Ink4a expression partially compensates for p18Ink4c loss in the intermediate pituitary, even in animals of intermediate (35-week-old) age.
|
Previous studies have shown that p16Ink4a expression increases with age in most mammalian tissues (24, 25, 27), and we noted that total pituitary similarly exhibited an increase in p16Ink4a expression with aging (Fig. 3C). A comparable age-induced induction of p16Ink4a expression was noted in p18Ink4c–/– mice such that the ratio of p16Ink4a expression in old (
57-week-old) versus young (10.6-week-old) pituitary was the same for wild-type or p18Ink4c–/– mice (Fig. 3C). Therefore, old p18Ink4c–/– mice showed a >40-fold increase in the mRNA expression of p16Ink4a compared with young wild-type mice, indicating the additive induction of p16Ink4a in this compartment in response to aging and p18Ink4c deficiency.
p16Ink4a and p18Ink4c coordinately control proliferation in the islets. To determine if the effect of combined Ink4 loss was seen in other tissues, we considered the pancreatic islet from 35-week-old mice (29, 32–34). As previously reported for p18Ink4c–/– mice (34), we found that p16Ink4a–/–;p18Ink4c–/– mice showed a modest increase in median islet size compared with wild-type and p16Ink4a–/– mice (Supplementary Fig. S2). There was no discernable difference in islet size between p18Ink4c–/– and p16Ink4a–/–;p18Ink4c–/– mice in animals of this age. Double staining with Ki67 and insulin indicated that the majority (>80%) of proliferating islet cells were ß-cells (data not shown), whose replication is regulated by cdk4, p18Ink4c, and cyclin D2 in the adult (32–35). In mice of this age, no significant difference in proliferation was seen between wild-type (0.58%), p16Ink4a–/– (0.67%), or p18Ink4c–/– (0.71%) islets for any pairwise comparison (Supplementary Fig. S2). However, p16Ink4a–/–;p18Ink4c–/– islets had a significantly higher rate of proliferation (0.98%) than wild-type (P = 0.02), p16Ink4a–/– (P = 0.08), and p18Ink4c–/– (P = 0.02) islets. It is important to note that these studies were carried out in young mice, and we expect that the effects of p16Ink4a loss would be more pronounced in older mice, as p16Ink4a expression potently inhibits islet proliferation in an age-dependent manner (24, 25). In aggregate, these data suggest that p16Ink4a and p18Ink4c coordinately regulate cdk4/6-dependent proliferation in the pancreatic ß-cells of adult mice.
Ink4 family members can transcriptionally compensate for loss of other members. To determine if the increase in p16Ink4a mRNA in the pituitary was tissue specific, we examined other tissues from p18Ink4c–/– mice. p16Ink4a levels were elevated in the adrenal glands (32.3-fold), spleen (4.3-fold), and kidney (3.9-fold) of p18Ink4c–/– mice, but there was no discernable change in p16Ink4a in the lung (Fig. 3B). The pituitary, adrenal glands, and spleen also showed moderately elevated levels of Arf and p15Ink4b, but little change was seen in the kidney or the lung. These results suggest that loss of p18Ink4c induces expression of other cdk inhibitors, specifically p16Ink4a in a tissue specific fashion in vivo.
It is possible that changes in cdk inhibitor levels could be a non–cell-autonomous effect due increased in vivo proliferation from p18Ink4c loss. We thus turned our attention to a more purified cell system (MEFs), which express all four Ink4 proteins (27). An examination of wild-type MEFs showed a massive increase in expression in all three transcripts from the Ink4/Arf locus (p15Ink4b, p16Ink4a, and Arf) in the first few days of culture, which was not seen for p18Ink4c and p19Ink4d (Fig. 4A ). However, only p16Ink4a continued to increase throughout passage, whereas mRNA levels of Arf, p15Ink4b, p18Ink4c, p19Ink4d, p21Cip1, and p27Kip1 remained relatively constant.
|
10 population doublings) for cdk inhibitor expression. p16Ink4a–/– MEFs had a significant increase in p15Ink4b (5.5-fold), moderate increases in Arf (2.5-fold) and p21Cip1 (1.6-fold) and a slight increase in p19Ink4d (1.3-fold) at both the mRNA (Fig. 4B) and protein (Fig. 4C) levels when compared with wild-type MEFs. As was seen in the various tissues in vivo (Fig. 3B), p18Ink4c–/– MEFs showed the greatest increase in p16Ink4a levels (2.9-fold) and more modest change in Arf (1.9-fold), p21Cip1 (1.4-fold), and p15Ink4b (2.1-fold), with little change in p19Ink4d (0.9-fold). MEFs lacking both p16Ink4a and p18Ink4c showed a large difference in the expression of p15Ink4b (4.8-fold) and smaller increases for Arf (2.8-fold), p21Cip1 (1.8-fold), and p19Ink4d (2.0-fold). There were no detectable differences in p27Kip1 mRNA (data not shown) or protein (Fig. 4C) between genotypes. Interestingly, all changes in mRNA levels were closely mirrored by changes in protein expression, suggesting that protein and message correlate highly under these conditions (compare Fig. 4B and C). Importantly, the compensation among the ink4 proteins is not complete, as p16Ink4a–/–, p18Ink4c–/–, and p16Ink4a–/–;p18Ink4c–/– MEFs show elevated cdk4 kinase activity (Fig. 4D) compared with wild-type cells. In aggregate, these results suggest that increased cdk4 activity due to loss of Ink4 proteins can be partially compensated for through activation of either p15Ink4b or p16Ink4a both in vitro and in vivo. Cdk4/6 kinase activity is required for proliferation in specific compartments in adult mice. Genetic data have suggested a role for cdk4 in the regulation of proliferation in the pituitary and the pancreatic islets (20, 29, 33–35). We have found that these tissues show increased proliferation in mice lacking the cdk4/6 inhibitors p16Ink4a and p18Ink4c (Fig. 3A; Supplementary Fig. S2), suggesting a role for cdk4/6 catalytic activity in the regulation of these tissues in adult mice. However, cdk4/6 kinase activity is required for development of certain embryonic tissues, leading to late embryonic lethality in cyclin D (36) or cdk4/6 (37) null animals, thus limiting the ability to examine adult tissues. To address this issue, we determined the effect of acute cdk4/6 inhibition in 26-week-old p16Ink4a–/–;p18Ink4c–/– mice using PD 0332991, a specific inhibitor of cdk4/6, but not cdk2 or other tested kinases (38). PD 0332991 is a pyrido(2,3-d)pyrimidin-7-one compound modified with a 2-aminopyridine side chain that has been shown to block the growth of pRB-competent human cell lines and xenografted tumors with potent activity at nanomolar concentrations. PD 0332991 shows good oral bioavailability and can be given to mice for prolonged treatment with minimal toxicity (21, 38). Comparable to its potency in human cells, PD 0332991 was shown to inhibit murine cdk4 activity at doses as low as 50 nmol/L, whereas cdk2 activity was not affected even at micromolar concentrations (Fig. 5A ).
|
Unlike the islet and pituitary, however, proliferation in other tissues was not affected by prolonged cdk4/6 inhibition. The high rate of proliferation seen in the small bowel was not changed after 2 weeks of PD 0332991 treatment (Fig. 5B and C). In addition, a subset of B220-negative and CD3-negative cells dispersed throughout the lymph nodes continued to proliferate despite cdk4/6 inhibition (Fig. 5D). The morphology, location, and frequency of these cells seem most consistent with inter-digitating dendritic cells of the lymph node. Although it is formally possible that PD 0332991 is excluded from certain proliferating compartments, a more likely explanation is that proliferation of some cell types in adult mice do not require cdk4/6 activity.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our data suggest that p16Ink4a and p18Ink4c are important determinants of physiologic and neoplastic proliferation in certain tissues in vivo. For example, p18Ink4c seemed to regulate homeostatic islet and pituitary proliferation in young mice, and this effect was constrained by p16Ink4a expression (Fig. 3, Fig. 4A, and Fig. 5B; Supplementary Fig. S2). Loss of both proteins potently cooperated in pituitary tumorigenesis in our study; whereas the tumor spectrum, frequency, and latency in p18Ink4c–/– mice was not augmented by additional loss of p15Ink4b (16) or p19Ink4d (28). Although high penetrance of lethal pituitary tumors limited the finding of new tumor types, the latency of lethal pituitary tumors in p16Ink4a–/–;p18Ink4c–/– mice was much shorter than either single knockout, with survival comparable to mice with cdk4R24C mutation, which does not bind Ink4 proteins (29, 30). Analysis of Ink4 levels in several tissues suggested an explanation for the cooperation seen between p16Ink4a and p18Ink4c loss: only p16Ink4a expression was significantly increased in the pituitary of p18Ink4c–/– mice, and not p15Ink4b or p19Ink4d. This compensation is not limited to the pituitary, where there was an obvious phenotype, but was also seen in other tissues to varying degrees and in cultured MEFs (Fig. 3B and Fig. 4B and C). These results suggest a potent feedback mechanism for regulating cdk4/6 in the response to increased kinase activity.
Control of p16Ink4a expression by Rb-family protein function has been noted in several systems where inactivation of Rb leads to a rapid increase in p16Ink4a expression (40, 41). Likewise, p16Ink4a can be activated by overexpression of E2F (42), arguing for the presence of a feedback loop between Rb and p16Ink4a. Clearly, however, physiologic proliferation with attendant Rb family phosphorylation is not generally sufficient to activate p16Ink4a expression. Instead, Rb loss only seems to activate p16Ink4a expression under specific circumstances (e.g., neoplastic growth). Recent work has suggested a possible explanation for the conditional regulation of p16Ink4a by Rb. Kotake et al. (43) have shown that the Polycomb group (PcG) protein Bmi-1, which durably represses of p16Ink4a expression in association with covalent histone modifications (44, 45), is targeted to the Ink4a/Arf locus by Rb family proteins. Additionally, Bmi-1 seems to require Rb family function to stably repress p16Ink4a expression in human and murine cells. Therefore, it is tempting to speculate that p16Ink4a expression (and possibly that of p15Ink4b and Arf as well) is increased in certain p18Ink4c-deficient tissues because of a relative hyperphosphorylation of pRb with attendant decrease in the PcG-mediated repression of the Ink4a/Arf locus.
Certain adult tissues require cdk4/6 activity. Recent genetic experiments have suggested that MEFs can proliferate without cdk4 (32, 33), cdk6 (37), or both (36, 37). Conversely, cdk2 kinase activity is also dispensable in MEFs, as cdk2–/– (46, 47) and cyclin E1–/–;cyclin E2–/– (48) cells can proliferate in culture, albeit more slowly. Although cdk4/6 activity was not a major determinant of MEF proliferation, this was not true in certain tissues in vivo such as the intermediate pituitary, germinal center B cells, and pancreatic ß-cell. In these tissues, the specific requirement of cdk4/6 catalytic activity was supported by our findings that genetic loss of p16Ink4a and p18Ink4c resulted in their increased proliferation, whereas acute pharmacologic inhibition abrogated their proliferation.
The dependence of pancreatic ß-cells cells on cdk4 for proliferation seems restricted to postnatal mice, as cdk4–/– mice are born with islets, but cannot sustain proliferation as the animal grows (32, 33). Conversely, loss of cdk4 regulation by p18Ink4c loss (34), p16Ink4a loss (25), or knock-in of cdk4R24C (29, 30, 33) results in aberrant proliferation in the pancreatic ß-cells. In aggregate, these results indicate an exclusive role for cdk4 in the regulation of pancreatic ß-cell proliferation in the adult mouse. Additionally, some tissues are regulated both prenatally and postnatally by cdk4/6. We have shown that B cells require cdk4/6 for proliferation in the adult animal, but they are also required in the developing embryo, as both D-deficient and cdk4/6-deficient mice die with greatly reduced common lymphoid progenitors (36, 37). Most importantly, cdk4/6–/– and cyclin-D1/D2/D3–/– mice show that the absolute requirement for cdk4/6 in development seems to hold in only a few select tissue compartments, as substantial development occurs in their absence (36, 37). Our data using a specific cdk4/6 inhibitor further these developmental observations to show that adult mice similarly only require cdk4/6 in a limited number of compartments, including B cells, pituitary adrenocortotrophs, and pancreatic ß-cells; compartments where p16Ink4a–/–;p18Ink4c–/– mice show the most marked phenotype.
In summary, we have shown that p16Ink4a compensates for p18Ink4c loss to regulate neoplastic and physiologic proliferation. Additionally, by both pharmacologic and genetic approaches, we have shown that p16Ink4a and p18Ink4c function in vivo to constrain cdk4/6 catalytic activity in highly specific compartments. The search for effective Cdk inhibitors has been hampered by lack of clarity over the best Cdk to target and the challenge of achieving appropriate levels of kinase selectivity. Our data show that cdk4/6 kinase activity is directly responsible for regulating proliferation of specific tissue compartments in adult mice and thus help to predict the toxicity of specific cdk4/6 inhibitors. Additionally, these data offer hope that certain established cancers (e.g., those characterized by cdk4 mutation, cyclin D amplification, or p16Ink4a loss) will also strictly require cdk4/6 activity for proliferation and therefore respond to specific pharmacologic inhibition of these kinases.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
We thank Peter Toogood, Diego Castrillon, Lishan Su, Grigory Kovalev, Paula Miliani de Marval, Feng Bai, Stuart Shumway, Chad McCall, and Kathy Wilber for advice, reagents, and technical assistance and Robert Duronio and William Kim for critical reading of the manuscript.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received 9/18/06. Revised 2/ 1/07. Accepted 3/12/07.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |