| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Immunology |
T Cells with Zoledronate and Interleukin-2 for Immunotherapy of Hormone-Refractory Prostate Cancer1 Dipartimento di Biopatologia e Metodologie Biomediche, and 2 Section of Medical Oncology, Dipartimento di Chirurgia ed Oncologia, Università di Palermo, Palermo, Italy; 3 Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, The Medical School of King's College at Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospitals, London, United Kingdom; 4 Institute of Cell Biology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; and 5 Department of Medical Biochemistry and Immunology, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, United Kingdom
Requests for reprints: Francesco Dieli, Dipartimento di Biopatologia e Metodologie Biomediche, Università di Palermo, Corso Tukory 211, Palermo 90134, Italy. Phone: 39-091-6555916; Fax: 39-091-6555924; E-mail: dieli{at}unipa.it.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
T cells have potent antitumor activity suggests their value in immunotherapy, particularly in areas of unmet need such as metastatic carcinoma. To this end, we initiated a phase I clinical trial in metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer to examine the feasibility and consequences of using the T-cell agonist zoledronate, either alone or in combination with low-dose interleukin 2 (IL-2), to activate peripheral blood cells. Nine patients were enlisted to each arm. Neither treatment showed appreciable toxicity. Most patients were treated with zoledronate + IL-2, but conversely only two treated with zoledronate displayed a significant long-term shift of peripheral cells toward an activated effector-memory–like state (TEM), producing IFN- and perforin. These patients also maintained serum levels of tumor necrosis factor–related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL), consistent with a parallel microarray analysis showing that TRAIL is produced by cells activated via the T-cell receptor and IL-2. Moreover, the numbers of TEM cells showed a statistically significant correlation with declining prostate-specific antigen levels and objective clinical outcomes that comprised three instances of partial remission and five of stable disease. By contrast, most patients treated only with zoledronate failed to sustain either cell numbers or serum TRAIL, and showed progressive clinical deterioration. Thus, zoledronate + IL-2 represents a novel, safe, and feasible approach to induce immunologic and clinical responses in patients with metastatic carcinomas, potentially providing a substantially increased window for specific approaches to be administered. Moreover, cell phenotypes and possibly serum TRAIL may constitute novel biomarkers of prognosis upon therapy with zoledronate + IL-2 in metastatic carcinoma. [Cancer Res 2007;67(15):7450–7] |
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
95% to 97% for radically prostatectomized patients with localized prostate cancer, up to one third such individuals experience disease recurrence (2, 3). In a median of 8 years after relapse, these patients will suffer from metastatic disease leading to death within another 2 to 5 years, independently of the applied treatment regimen (4). Advanced, recurrent, and metastatic tumors treated by androgen deprivation convert to androgen-independent growth within a few years and patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) have a median survival of only 16 months. Treatment options are limited to aggressive chemotherapy with survival benefits of 2 to 3 months (5, 6). This lack of effective therapies for HRPC has fueled an intensive search for novel modalities, including immunotherapy (5–8).
There is good evidence that tumors can naturally be controlled by the immune system (9), and most immunotherapy strategies aim to induce adaptive, tumor-specific responses of B cells and MHC-restricted 
ß T cells, particularly CD8 T cells. Nonetheless, despite major advances in this area, and the introduction of vaccine-based strategies, durable responses are rare and active immunotherapy is not yet an established modality. Tumor immunoevasion mechanisms are common and include the down-regulation of tumor-associated antigens, of MHC, and of costimulatory molecules (9, 10). By contrast to ß T cells, T cells are not MHC restricted and show less dependence on costimulators such as CD28. Moreover, T cells are a natural component of resistance to cutaneous carcinogenesis in mice (11), and in humans display potent MHC-unrestricted cytotoxic activity in vitro against various tumors, including prostate cancer cell lines (12, 13). Indeed, human V9V2 T cells expanded ex vivo and then adoptively transferred to severe combined immunodeficient mice xenografted with tumor cells showed efficacy against B-cell lymphoma; melanoma; and renal, pancreatic, and nasopharyngeal carcinoma (14). Building on this, the potential of human T cells for tumor immunotherapy has been directly analyzed and was recently expertly reviewed (15, 16).
Among T cells, human peripheral blood V9V2 T cells recognize low molecular mass nonpeptide ligands (17–20). Such "phosphoantigens" comprise isoprenoid pathway metabolites, as (E)-4-hydroxy-3-methyl-but-2-enyl PPi (HMB-PP) derived from bacteria and protozoa (19) and isopentenyl PPi (IPP) derived from host cells (20). Accordingly, pharmacologic agents, such as aminobisphosphonates, that cause an accumulation of such metabolites (21), sensitize tumor cells to V9V2 T cells. Recognition may then be sustained by the tumor cell expression of NKG2D ligands, such as MICA and MICB, and of an ATPase that binds the V9V2 T-cell receptor (TCR; ref. 22), and that unlike in normal cells is ectopically expressed on the tumor cell surface.
Like other T cells, V9V2 lymphocytes comprise distinct populations distinguishable on the basis of surface markers, effector functions, and trafficking properties. Naive (Tnaive,CD45RA+CD27+) and central memory (TCM, CD45RA–CD27+) cells home to secondary lymphoid organs and lack immediate effector functions, whereas the so-called effector-memory (TEM, CD45RA–CD27–) and terminally differentiated (TEMRA, CD45RA+CD27–) cells home to sites of inflammation where they display immediate effector functions such as cytokine production and cytotoxicity (23). Such functions are attractive weapons for immunotherapy strategies, and there are promising results from recent, relatively small-scale applications of V9V2 T cells to hematologic (24) and solid-tissue malignancies, including prostate cancer (25) and advanced renal cell carcinoma (26). Assessing that aminobisphosphonates such as zoledronate are already widely used in the clinic, we have conducted a phase I clinical trial in metastatic HRPC to determine the safety, feasibility, and response induced by activating V9V2 T cells in vivo using zoledronate either alone or in combination with low-dose IL-2. Although there has been a promising application of pamidronate and IL-2 to prescreened multiple myeloma and non–Hodgkin's lymphoma patients (24), there has been only one reported, small-scale application of zoledronate to solid tumors (25), and the consequences of a selective activation of T cells in vivo were unknown before the current study. In this regard, data presented here support the proposal that zoledronate + IL-2 may prove a novel, safe, feasible, and efficacious means to extend the life span of those with late stage metastatic carcinoma, and thereby to increase the window of the patients' availability for other, more tumor-specific molecular approaches.
|
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
3 months, with the presence of bone metastasis and a Kernovsky index >60%, were included. All patients had a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) increase of 
20% within 2 months. The median pretreatment PSA doubling time, calculated as described in ref. (27) was 4.1 months (range 4.3–3.9 months, respectively), and the median time to progression was 10.6 months (95% CI, 7.8–13.2 months). No statistically significant difference in either PSA doubling time or time to progression was found between patients enrolled to receive zoledronate and zoledronate + IL-2. With the exception of patients 1B and 2B, all other patients received docetaxel 36 mg/m2 i.v. over 15 to 30 min weekly for 6 consecutive weeks, on an 8-week cycle. All the patients had received four to five cycles docetaxel before being enrolled in this study. Patients were excluded if they were receiving any chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or bisphosphonates over a period 6 weeks before study entry; if they had severe cardiovascular disease, refractory hypertension, symptomatic coronary artery disease; a serum creatinine of >3.0 mg/dL or a corrected (for albumin) serum calcium of <8.0 mg/dL; if they had CNS metastases; a history of autoimmunity, with serious intercurrent chronic or acute illnesses or concurrent second malignancy; or if they were being treated with steroids or other immunosuppressive agents. Treatment with antiandrogen was withdrawn at least 4 weeks before study entry, whereas continuation of gonadal androgen suppression was conducted on all patients on luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogues. The main characteristics of the patients are shown in Supplementary Table S1. The clinical status of patients was evaluated according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (28). Treatment schedule. Eighteen subjects with metastatic HRPC were enrolled and randomized to receive either zoledronate (cohort A) or zoledronate + IL-2 (cohort B). Zoledronate (Novartis) was administered by a 15 min 100 mL i.v. infusion of normal saline at a standard dose of 4 mg, every 21 days. IL-2 (Chiron, 0.6 x 106 IU) was administered s.c. immediately after each zoledronate administration. All patients received 500 mg calcium supplement and 400 IU of vitamin D daily. This treatment schedule was done for 1 year.
Flow cytometry. Patients' blood samples were collected before (month 0) and at 3 months (6 days after the fourth administration of zoledronate or zoledronate/IL-2), 9 months (6 days after the 13th administration of zoledronate or zoledronate/IL-2), and 12 months (6 days after the 17th administration of zoledronate or zoledronate/IL-2) after the study began. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were obtained by Ficoll-Hypaque centrifugation and stained with FITC-, phycoerythrin-, phycoerythrin-Cy5–, or allophycocyanin-conjugated antibodies against CD27, CD45RA, CD69, HLA-DR, CD3, CD56, CD4, CD8, TCR pan ß, TCR pan , TCR V9, or TCR V2 [all monoclonal antibodies (mAb) were from BD PharMingen]. Cells (105) from each sample were analyzed using a FACScalibur supported with CellQuest acquisition and data analysis software (Becton Dickinson). The lymphocytes were gated for forward/side scatter.
Analysis of V9V2 T cells. The medium used throughout was complete RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated human pooled AB serum, 2 mmol/L L-glutamine, 20 nmol/L HEPES, and 100 units/mL penicillin/streptomycin. PBMC were labeled with CFSE (Molecular Probes) and cultured at 37°C, in 5% CO2, at 106/mL in 96-well flat-bottomed plates (0.2 mL/well), with isopentenyl PPi (IPP, Sigma Chemical Co.; 10–5 mol/L final concentration) and 20 units/mL IL-2 (23, 25). Seven days later, cells were collected and the percentage of V9V2 cells within the CD3+ population was assessed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). The absolute number of V9V2 T cells present in each culture was calculated according to the following formula: % V9V2 T cells x total number of viable cells/100. The V9V2 T-cell expansion factor was then calculated by dividing the absolute number of V9V2 T cells in stimulated cultures by the number of V9V2 T cells cultured in the absence of IPP (23). IFN levels in the 48 h culture supernatants were assessed by two mAbs sandwich ELISA (23) following manufacturer's recommendations (R&D Systems). N-CBZ-L-lysine-thiobenzyl (BLT)-esterase levels in 24 h culture supernatants were determined by the BLT esterase assay. Briefly, 20 µL culture supernatant were incubated with 35 µL 1 mmol/L BLT (Sigma), 35 µL 1 mmol/L 5-5'-dithio-bis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid; Sigma), and 10 µL 0.1% Triton X-100 (Sigma). After incubation for 30 min at 37°C, absorbance was measured at 405 nm (23).
Intracellular staining for IFN- and perforin. PBMC stimulated with IPP as described above, in the presence of monensin for 6 h at 37°C in 5% CO2 were harvested, washed, and stained with anti-V2 mAb in incubation buffer (PBS containing 1% FCS and 0.1% Na azide) for 30 min at 4°C. Cells were then washed twice in PBS with 1% FCS and fixed with PBS containing 4% paraformaldehyde overnight at 4°C. Fixation was followed by permeabilization with PBS containing 1% FCS, 0.3% saponin, and 0.1% Na azide for 15 min at 4°C, and fixed permeabilized cells were stained with an anti–IFN- antibody. After two more washes in PBS containing 1% FCS, the cells were analyzed by FACSCalibur. Lymphocytes were gated by forward and side scatter and analysis done on 100,000 acquired events for each sample. For detection of intracellular perforin, PBMC were stained directly ex vivo (i.e., without any antigen stimulation in vitro) in calcium-free medium with anti-V2 mAb as above described, washed, and fixed with PBS containing 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at 4°C. After two washes in permeabilization buffer, cells were stained with antiperforin antibody (G2, Alexis; 2 µg/mL); after two more washes in PBS + 1% FCS, the cells were analyzed as above.
Analysis of tumor necrosis factor–related apoptosis inducing ligand expression. PBMC from healthy volunteers were stimulated in vitro for 3 days with zoledronate at the indicated concentrations, with or without IL-2 (100 units/mL). Brefeldin A (Sigma) was added to the cultures at 10 µg/mL 3 h before harvest, and surface-stained cells (CD3-ECD and V9-PE-Cy5, Beckman Coulter) were then labeled using the Fix & Perm kit (Caltag) with anti-TRAIL (tumor necrosis factor–related apoptosis inducing ligand)-phycoerythrin (BD Biosciences). TRAIL in sera was detected using a human TRAIL DuoSet ELISA kit (R&D Systems).
Statistical analysis. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess the effect of treatments on 12-month survival; a sample size calculation of 18 patients (nine per group) assured a power of 85% in detecting a 3-month difference in survival curves among groups, with a SD of ±3 and a two-sided error of 5. The significance of the differences in survival was assessed using the log-rank, Breslow (Generalized Wilcoxon), or Tarone-Ware tests. Data from more than two groups were compared using one-way ANOVA with Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison test using Instat software (version 3.05, GraphPad). P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
9V2 T cells can be activated in a non-MHC–dependent manner by phosphoantigens or by agents that provoke the accumulation of endogenous PPi such as IPP. Among such agents, aminobisphosphonates are already widely used in the clinic, for example, to diminish osteoclast activity in osteoporosis or in elderly patients receiving chronic steroid treatment. By several criteria, zoledronate is the most potent and efficacious clinically approved aminobisphosphonate (29, 30). Our ongoing molecular analyses of V9V2 T-cell responses have indicated that IL-2 up-regulates several effector molecules that may be efficacious in tumor therapy, and is active in vivo on V9V2 T cells at a lower concentration than that required to affect ß T cells or natural killer (NK) cells. For these reasons, we rationalized that zoledronate ± low-dose IL-2 may provide a feasible and safe means to activate V9V2 T cells in vivo. Toxicity. One to 3 days after the first administration, six of nine patients treated with zoledronate + IL-2 (67%) and two of nine patients treated with zoledronate alone (22%) developed a transient flu-like syndrome that was easily controlled by oral paracetamol. This side effects was expected as it was also detected after application of pamidronate and IL-2 to multiple myeloma and non–Hodgkin's lymphoma patients (24). Two patients (22%) receiving zoledronate + IL-2 developed a local erythema at the site of IL-2 administration. No other hematologic, hepatic, renal, or neurologic toxicity, or allergic, autoimmune, or fatigue side effect was observed during the treatment.
T-cell responses. Phenotypic and functional responses of T cells were measured before and at 3, 9, and 12 months after beginning treatment with zoledronate ± IL-2 (Fig. 1A and B
). By multiple criteria, the surviving patients in the two treatment protocols showed substantially different effects on cells. Before treatment, almost all patients displayed 25 x 103 to 45 x 103 cells per milliliter of blood. As four patients treated with zoledronate alone (cohort A) died before month 3, longitudinal analysis was possible in only five such patients (1A, 2A, 3A, 7A, and 8A). Of these, only patient 7A sustained starting levels of cells across the treatment period. Although patient 1A showed a transient increase in cell numbers at 3 months, the cells then declined to below starting levels.
|
T cells across the full period. One surviving patient (9B) showed a decrease in peripheral T cells, up to 9 months, although those numbers then stabilized, whereas another (6B) showed a more substantial ongoing decline. Both of the two cohort B patients who died (5B and 7B) displayed precipitous and progressive decreases in peripheral blood T-cell numbers. In addition to the different frequencies of peripheral blood cells in the two cohorts, there was a more pronounced increase in CD69 (Fig. 1C) and/or HLA-DR (Fig. 1D) antigens on T cells in cohort B, indicating greater activation in vivo. The stimulatory effects of zoledronate ± IL-2 treatment were largely restricted to T cells, because neither absolute numbers nor CD69 and HLA-DR expression were altered on ß T cells or NK cells (Supplementary Table S2).
When a subset analysis was done on T cells in the seven cohort B patients surviving through month 12, there were in all cases sharp and progressive decreases in absolute numbers of cells with naïve-like and central memory–like phenotypes (Tnaive and TCM T cells), and, correspondingly, albeit more variable increases in cells with effector memory–like and terminally differentiated phenotypes (TEM and TEMRA cells), although the TEMRA cells declined somewhat by 12 months (Fig. 2
). The pattern of increased numbers and an altered phenotype of peripheral cells was strikingly depicted by the raw data for patient 1B shown in Supplementary Fig. S1. Overall, the statistically significant changes indicate that zoledronate + IL-2 provokes a long-term effector maturation and mobilization of peripheral blood T cells and evoke our previous observations after zoledronate injection in cancer patients (25). Indeed, a similar trend was seen in the three patients treated with zoledronate alone surviving more than 12 months (data not shown), although the absolute numbers of peripheral T cells declined in all but one of these patients (7A).
|
T cells in cohort B were paralleled by modifications in functional responses in vitro. As shown in Fig. 3
, proliferative responses to IPP declined over time, whereas the capacity to produce IFN- and to release BLT-esterase (as a variable of cytotoxicity) consistently increased, peaking at 9 months. Again, this trend is illustrated by raw data for patient 1B (Supplementary Fig. S2).
|
T cells, achieved a partial remission. In contrast, six of nine patients treated with zoledronate + IL-2 showed favorable clinical responses (Supplementary Table S1; Fig. 1B). Two patients (1B and 8B) achieved a partial remission, and each showed aggregate increases in T-cell numbers across the treatment period. Four additional patients (2B, 3B, 4B, and 9B) achieved stable disease, lasting 14 to 16 months, and with a sole exception (9B) each showed sustained T-cell numbers; indeed, even in 9B, T-cell numbers had stabilized by 9 to 12 months at 10 x 103 T cells per milliliter of blood. By contrast, the deterioration of patients 5B, 6B, and 7B was in each case preceded by a substantial decline in T-cell numbers (Fig. 1A and B). The 12-month survival curves of patients treated with zoledronate alone and those treated with zoledronate + IL-2 is shown in Fig. 4A
. Figure 4B shows echo-color Doppler imaging of the prostate of patient 1B before (top) and 12 months (bottom) after zoledronate + IL-2 therapy, showing regression of prostate malignancy.
|
T-cell numbers was provocative and was investigated further. A statistically significant correlation existed between favorable outcome at 12 months, and either total cell numbers or the numbers of TCR TEM cells measured at 9 months (Fig. 5A and B
). Moreover, a statistically significant inverse correlation was also found between either total T cells or TCR TEM cells and serum PSA levels at 9 months (Fig. 5C and D). Of note, we did not find any correlation between pretreatment PSA levels and total cells (r = 0.0033, P = 0.99) or their TEM subset (r = 0.088, P = 0.81). To illustrate this point further, Supplementary Fig. S3A and B shows a longitudinal analysis of total cells, the TEM subset, and serum PSA levels in a patient (1B) achieving an objective immune response (partial remission), and in a patient (6B) showing disease progression.
|
cells stimulated with a phosphoantigen TCR agonist (HMB-PP) in the presence of different cytokines, including IL-2 (31). The study confirmed that IFN- and tumor necrosis factor- are up-regulated in such circumstances, but additionally found that the cytolytic mediator, TRAIL, was specifically up-regulated in the presence of IL-2. We therefore tested whether TRAIL was likewise up-regulated in vitro by zoledronate + IL-2, more than by zoledronate alone, and confirmed that it was, identifying a provocative potential difference between the two cohorts (Fig. 6A
). Although these findings postdated the analysis of patients' T cells, an a posteriori examination of patients' serum showed that TRAIL levels were essentially maintained in cohort B, whereas they mostly declined in cohort A (Fig. 6B). Of note, the single outlier in cohort A (7A) whose TRAIL levels had recovered close to their pretreatment levels by 9 months was also the one patient treated with zoledronate alone who maintained T-cell numbers and who showed a partial remission. When serum TRAIL levels at 9 months were examined for all 11 patients surviving at 12 months, there was a clear trend whereby higher TRAIL levels were associated with improved clinical outcome (Fig. 6C); in fact, there was only a single overt outlier (6B) who was treated with zoledronate + IL-2 and who maintained TRAIL levels, but whose disease progressed. This patient prevented the correlation between TRAIL levels and outcome reaching statistical significance. Nonetheless, the likely biological significance of the correlation between clinical outcome and serum TRAIL concentrations at 9 months was highlighted by the lack of an obvious correlation with other variables, including pretreatment TRAIL levels (Supplementary Fig. S4), and 9-month levels of other immunologic mediators (data not shown).
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
T cells to exert tumor immunotherapy. A practical issue has been how to accomplish this. In this regard, an attractive feature of human peripheral blood V9V2 T cells is their capacity to be readily and specifically activated either by low molecular mass phosphoantigens, such as HMB-PP or IPP, or by agents that provoke IPP accumulation. Among the latter, aminobisphosphonates are well established in the clinic, and extensive data are available on the antiangiogenic, antiosteolytic, and proapoptotic properties of the compounds (29, 30).
In patients with multiple myeloma or with low-grade non–Hodgkin lymphoma, occurrences of acute-phase reaction to i.v. pamidronate were attributed to the systemic activation of phosphoantigen-reactive T cells (24), and this provoked the deliberate treatment of lymphoma patients with pamidronate and low-dose IL-2. This achieved some promising results after patients were prescreened for those whose T cells would substantively respond to pamidronate + IL-2 in vitro (24). By several criteria, zoledronate is more potent and efficacious than pamidronate, and previous studies by our own group in patients with breast (n = 3) and prostate (n = 6) tumors showed that zoledronate induced in vivo the maturation of peripheral blood T cells into more potent cytotoxic and IFN-–secreting cells (25). This notwithstanding, there has hitherto been no study of the consequences of a selective activation of T cells in vivo in patients with late-stage, metastatic carcinomas, a significant unmet clinical need. Moreover, there has been no assessment of the consequences of administering zoledronate in vivo in the presence or absence of a specific cytokine, such as IL-2. This is important given the evidence that the differentiation of cells, like other T cells, is substantially influenced by the prevailing cytokine milieu (31–34). Given such paucity of existing data, the assessment of toxicity was a major aim of the current study. Our findings reveal that the combination of zoledronate + IL-2 was well tolerated, with no long-term overt toxicity observed. Consistent with a lack of significant side effects, neither zoledronate nor IL-2 used at the low doses described in this study had any measurable effects on either ß T cells or NK cells (Supplementary Table S2).
A second aim of our study was to assess whether reproducible phenotypic changes were induced in the T-cell compartment. In this regard, the most striking effect was the long-term and substantial differentiation of T cells toward an effector-memory–like phenotype, with absolute numbers of such cells particularly enhanced in patients treated with zoledronate + IL-2; indeed, absolute numbers of peripheral Tnaive and TCM cells decreased by 3 months after treatment and had virtually disappeared at 9 to 12 months. This was seen in the majority of zoledronate + IL-2–treated patients without any prescreening for those whose cells would respond to this regimen in vitro. Based on variable T-cell repertoires and on the preexisting status of such cells, it is known that peripheral blood responses to phosphoantigens or aminobisphosphonates show individual variation, and by analogy to earlier studies in lymphoma (24), one can only assume that such prior screening may well improve the response rate to zoledronate + IL-2. A similar trend was seen in three of nine patients receiving zoledronate alone, although they were, with one exception (7A), less impressive, and may have been sustained by individually variable levels of endogenous cytokines.
A third and final aim of our study was to assess whether there was a differential clinical response to the treatment regimens. Indeed, whereas only two of nine patients treated with zoledronate achieved an objective tumor response, this was true for 67% of those treated with zoledronate + IL-2, where the response at 12 months showed a correlation with the absolute numbers of total T cells; with the numbers of TEM cells; and although not significantly, with serum levels of TRAIL measured at 9 months posttreatment. Moreover, the fact that clinical outcome was influenced by the type of regimen used to activate T cells strongly suggests that T-cell activation is at least partially causal to the response. Thus, T cells stimulated in vitro with zoledronate and IL-2 possess an increased capacity for killing tumor cells in vitro (30),6 whereas our immunologic monitoring provided no evidence that zoledronate ± low-dose IL-2 induced activation, expansion, and/or differentiation of either ß T cells or NK cells (note that the concentration of IL-2 used here is much lower than that used in other immunotherapies; refs. 35–37). Interestingly, it was recently reported that the presence of TEM cells within colorectal cancer correlates with the absence of pathologic evidence of early metastases and with prolonged survival (38). However, despite the provided in vitro evidence that stimulation with zoledronate + IL-2 increases the production of TRAIL by cells in short-term cultures, we have actually no proof that cells solely contribute to sustained serum TRAIL levels in patients treated with zoledronate + IL-2. The finding that neither absolute numbers nor CD69 and HLA-DR expression were altered on ß T cells or NK cells (Supplementary Table 2) strongly points to a selective effects on cells. The fact that patients enrolled in this study were at a terminal stage of disease might also contribute to the lack of increase in serum TRAIL levels.
We have yet to elucidate the key contributions to tumor regulation made by TEM cells induced by zoledronate + IL-2. Nonetheless, clues should exist in the ongoing microarray analysis of V9V2 cells stimulated via the TCR in the presence of IL-2. This study has already provoked our analysis of TRAIL as a potential active component, and, guided by this, future studies will look directly at TRAIL production by T cells in an immunotherapy context. For several reasons, TRAIL is an attractive candidate: For example, it kills many tumor cell lines but not most nontransformed cells, and the selective efficacy of histone deacetylase inhibitors versus acute myeloid leukemia cells involves TRAIL induction in vivo (39, 40). Nonetheless, there is a view that the results using agonistic anti–TRAIL receptor antibody as an antitumor agent have been disappointing, perhaps because of resistance to TRAIL-mediated apoptosis, which is common in cancer cells (41). Interestingly, resistance can be overcome by IFN- (42), which is produced in high amounts by zoledronate + IL-2–stimulated V9V2 T cells, and which is positively reinforced by signaling via TRAIL, and vice versa (43, 44). Thus, it is the maintenance of TRAIL production in the context of other products of V9V2 TEM cells that may be key, consistent with which clinical outcome did not correlate with pretreatment levels of TRAIL. This emphasizes a major potential advantage of cell-based therapy. Indeed, the combination of an agonistic anti–TRAIL receptor antibody and the induction of IFN-–producing T cells was shown to eradicate established tumors in mice (45).
The encouraging prospect that the activation of peripheral blood V9V2 T cells can be efficacious against solid tumors requires further follow-up, including an analysis of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes to assess whether the activated cells are indeed infiltrating the tumors and/or are helping other cells to do so. Wang and colleagues recently reported that human prostate and breast carcinoma are naturally and strongly infiltrated by TRAIL-producing T cells,7 suggesting the value of analyzing the regulation on zoledronate + IL-2–stimulated-V9V2 T cells of trafficking molecules and of molecules such as NKG2D that may contribute to tumor recognition (46, 47). The improved cell surface definition of an antitumor V9V2 T cell, coupled with the correlation of clinical outcome with the numbers of TEM T cells, also suggests that in the short-term, the peripheral blood analysis of the status of cells, and of TRAIL, may provide a useful biomarker of a patient's antitumor response upon therapy with zoledronate + IL-2.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
We thank Giorgio Stassi and Daniele Santini for reading the manuscript, Gavin Screaton for advice on TRAIL, Hassan Jomaa for help and advice, and Rong-Fu Wang for sharing data before manuscript submission.
|
Footnotes |
|---|
Present address for D. Vermijlen: Institute for Medical Immunology, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Gosselies, Belgium.
7 T Cell Conference; 2006 Mar 26–28; La Jolla, CA. 
Received 1/16/07. Revised 5/14/07. Accepted 5/25/07.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
T cells. Science 2001;294:605–9. T lymphocytes for cancer immunotherapy. Drug Discov Today 2006;3:17–23.[Medline]9V2+ -T cells mediate innate antitumor activity against human prostate cancer cells in vitro. J Urol 2005;173:1552–6.[CrossRef][Medline]9V2 T cells in vitro and in SCID mice in vivo. J Immunol 2004;173:6767–76. T cells. Leuk Lymphoma 2005;46:671–80.[Medline] T cells in tumor immunology. Cancer Res 2007;67:5–8. T cells: pattern recognition by the adaptive immune system. Springer Semin Immunopathol 2000;22:191–217.[CrossRef][Medline] T cells by nonpeptidic mycobacterial ligands. Science 1994;264:267–70. T cell activation. FEBS Lett 2003;544:4–10.[CrossRef][Medline] T cells. Nature 1995;375:155–8.[CrossRef][Medline] cells recognize endogenous mevalonate metabolites in tumor cells. J Exp Med 2003;197:163–8.9V2 T cell receptor interactions with a surface F1-ATPase-related structure and apolipoprotein A-I. Immunity 2005;22:71–80.[CrossRef][Medline]2 T cells and migratory routes in lymph nodes or inflammatory sites. J Exp Med 2003;198:391–7. T cells for immune therapy of patients with lymphoid malignancies. Blood 2003;102:200–6. T-lymphocyte effector functions by bisphosphonate zoledronic acid in cancer patients in vivo. Blood 2003;102:2310–1. T cells against advanced renal cell carcinoma: a pilot study. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2007;56:469–76.[CrossRef][Medline] T cells: insights into unconventional T cell pleiotropy. J Immunol 2007;178:4304–14. T cells toward Th1- or Th2-phenotype. Cell Immunol 2001;212:110–7.[CrossRef][Medline] T cells towards distinct memory phenotypes. Cell Immunol 2002;218:1–6.[CrossRef][Medline]9V2 naive, memory and effector T cell subsets. Eur J Immunol 2005;35:1764–72.[CrossRef][Medline] activation in the graft-versus-tumor effect against colon tumors. Int J Cancer 2006;118:2237–46.[CrossRef][Medline] production in T cells by signal transduced through TNF-related apoptosis inducing ligand. J Immunol 2001;167:1347–52. T cells in tumor immunity and their control by NK receptors. Microbes Infect 1999;1:227–34.[CrossRef][Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. Li, M. J. Herold, B. Kimmel, I. Muller, B. Rincon-Orozco, V. Kunzmann, and T. Herrmann Reduced Expression of the Mevalonate Pathway Enzyme Farnesyl Pyrophosphate Synthase Unveils Recognition of Tumor Cells by V{gamma}9V{delta}2 T Cells J. Immunol., June 15, 2009; 182(12): 8118 - 8124. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Clezardin Insights into the Antitumor Effects of Bisphosphonates from Preclinical Models and Potential Clinical Implications IBMS BoneKEy, June 1, 2009; 6(6): 210 - 217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Todaro, M. D'Asaro, N. Caccamo, F. Iovino, M. G. Francipane, S. Meraviglia, V. Orlando, C. La Mendola, G. Gulotta, A. Salerno, et al. Efficient Killing of Human Colon Cancer Stem Cells by {gamma}{delta} T Lymphocytes J. Immunol., June 1, 2009; 182(11): 7287 - 7296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Gertner-Dardenne, C. Bonnafous, C. Bezombes, A.-H. Capietto, V. Scaglione, S. Ingoure, D. Cendron, E. Gross, J.-F. Lepage, A. Quillet-Mary, et al. Bromohydrin pyrophosphate enhances antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity induced by therapeutic antibodies Blood, May 14, 2009; 113(20): 4875 - 4884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Devaud, E. Bilhere, S. Loizon, V. Pitard, C. Behr, J.-F. Moreau, J. Dechanet-Merville, and M. Capone Antitumor Activity of {gamma}{delta} T Cells Reactive against Cytomegalovirus-Infected Cells in a Mouse Xenograft Tumor Model Cancer Res., May 1, 2009; 69(9): 3971 - 3978. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Thedrez, C. Harly, A. Morice, S. Salot, M. Bonneville, and E. Scotet IL-21-Mediated Potentiation of Antitumor Cytolytic and Proinflammatory Responses of Human V{gamma}9V{delta}2 T Cells for Adoptive Immunotherapy J. Immunol., March 15, 2009; 182(6): 3423 - 3431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Gnant, B. Mlineritsch, W. Schippinger, G. Luschin-Ebengreuth, S. Postlberger, C. Menzel, R. Jakesz, M. Seifert, M. Hubalek, V. Bjelic-Radisic, et al. Endocrine Therapy plus Zoledronic Acid in Premenopausal Breast Cancer N. Engl. J. Med., February 12, 2009; 360(7): 679 - 691. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Gong, L. Shao, Y. Wang, C. Y. Chen, D. Huang, S. Yao, X. Zhan, H. Sicard, R. Wang, and Z. W. Chen Phosphoantigen-activated V{gamma}2V{delta}2 T cells antagonize IL-2-induced CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ T regulatory cells in mycobacterial infection Blood, January 22, 2009; 113(4): 837 - 845. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z. Yuan, R. Wang, Y. Lee, C. Y. Chen, X. Yu, Z. Wu, D. Huang, L. Shen, and Z. W. Chen Tuberculosis-Induced Variant IL-4 mRNA Encodes a Cytokine Functioning As Growth Factor for (E)-4-Hydroxy-3-Methyl-But-2-Enyl Pyrophosphate-Specific V{gamma}2V{delta}2 T Cells J. Immunol., January 15, 2009; 182(2): 811 - 819. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Sarikonda, H. Wang, K.-J. Puan, X.-h. Liu, H. K. Lee, Y. Song, M. D. Distefano, E. Oldfield, G. D. Prestwich, and C. T. Morita Photoaffinity Antigens for Human {gamma}{delta} T Cells J. Immunol., December 1, 2008; 181(11): 7738 - 7750. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Wei, D. Huang, X. Lai, M. Chen, W. Zhong, R. Wang, and Z. W. Chen Definition of APC Presentation of Phosphoantigen (E)-4-Hydroxy-3-methyl-but-2-enyl Pyrophosphate to V{gamma}2V{delta}2 TCR J. Immunol., October 1, 2008; 181(7): 4798 - 4806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z. Liu, I.-E. A. Eltoum, B. Guo, B. H. Beck, G. A. Cloud, and R. D. Lopez Protective Immunosurveillance and Therapeutic Antitumor Activity of {gamma}{delta} T Cells Demonstrated in a Mouse Model of Prostate Cancer J. Immunol., May 1, 2008; 180(9): 6044 - 6053. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Takahara, M. Miyai, M. Tomiyama, M. Mutou, A. J. Nicol, and M. Nieda Copulsing tumor antigen-pulsed dendritic cells with zoledronate efficiently enhance the expansion of tumor antigen-specific CD8+ T cells via V{gamma}9{gamma}{delta} T cell activation J. Leukoc. Biol., March 1, 2008; 83(3): 742 - 754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |
, patients treated with zoledronate + IL-2; 
, patients treated with zoledronate alone. C, inverse correlation between numbers of total 