| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Reviews |
1 Tumor Targeting Group, Academic Unit of Pathology, The Sir Henry Wellcome Laboratories for Medical Research, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, United Kingdom; 2 Angiogenesis and Tumor Targeting Research Unit, and San Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy, San Raffaele Scientific Institute; and 3 San Raffaele Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
Requests for reprints: Claire E. Lewis, Tumor Targeting Group, Academic Unit of Pathology, The Sir Henry Wellcome Laboratories for Medical Research, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield S10 2RX, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-114-271-2903; Fax: 44-114-271-2903; E-mail: claire.lewis{at}sheffield.ac.uk.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Bone Marrow–Derived Cells Regulate Tumor Angiogenesis |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One particular tumor-infiltrating, innate effector, the macrophage, has been shown to play a critical role in tumor development. Monocytes are recruited from the bloodstream into tumors and, as they extravasate across the tumor vasculature, begin to differentiate into macrophages (6). Several studies have now shown that these tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) promote both tumor angiogenesis and metastasis (7). For example, when Lin et al. (8) crossed MMTV-PyMT mice (which spontaneously develop mammary tumors) with op/op mice, which lack a functional CSF-1 gene (a crucial growth factor for macrophages and their precursors), the tumors that grew in these macrophage-depleted mice showed a slower rate of progression to malignancy and formed fewer pulmonary metastases than those in CSF-1 wild-type mice. Moreover, these authors recently showed that TAMs contribute to the "angiogenic switch" that occurs when hyperplastic lesions develop into early-stage carcinomas in MMTV-PyMT mice (9). Most recently, an elegant study by Condeelis' group has used multiphoton imaging to visualize the cooperation between TAMs and tumor cells during the process of tumor cell intravasation and metastasis (10). These data are consistent with clinical findings that high numbers of TAMs often correlate with increased tumor vascularization and/or lymph node involvement in human tumors (11).
TAM involvement in tumor angiogenesis is mediated, at least in part, by their release of a wide array of proangiogenic factors and enzymes, including vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9). For example, TAMs are an important source of VEGF-A in mouse mammary (9) and human breast (12) tumors. Moreover, Coussens et al. (13) used a transgenic mouse model of spontaneous skin tumorigenesis (K14-HPV) to show the essential role of MMP-9 production by tumor-associated stromal cells, such as TAMs, in tumor progression. It therefore came as no surprise that ablation of TAMs using a DNA vaccine approach in various murine tumor models resulted in marked reduction in tumor VEGF and MMP-9 levels and the suppression of tumor angiogenesis, growth, and metastasis (14).
One subset of monocytes has recently been shown to have a particularly important role in tumor angiogenesis—those expressing Tie2, an angiopoietin receptor thought previously to be restricted mainly to endothelial cells and hematopoietic stem cells (15, 16). The selective elimination of these Tie2-expressing monocytes (TEM) by means of a suicide gene dramatically impaired angiogenesis in mouse tumors and induced substantial tumor regression (15, 16). The presence and phenotype of these TEMs have now been defined in human blood and tumors (15, 17, 18), and their role in tumor angiogenesis investigated using cell transplantation assays. Furthermore, the pronounced effects on TEMs of factors present in the tumor microenvironment, such as hypoxia and angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2), have also now been described (17, 18). These studies are outlined in greater detail below.
| Identification of TEMs |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In addition to tumors, TEMs can be detected at low frequency in the peripheral blood of both mice and humans (15, 17, 18). Whereas only 1% to 2% of total leukocytes are Tie2+, a substantial fraction (
20%) of circulating monocytes express Tie2 (17, 18). In mice, the circulating Tie2+CD45+ hematopoietic cells are mostly CD11b+Gr-1low/neg (15), whereas in humans they express CD14, CD16, and CD11c (17, 18). The surface marker profile of mouse and human TEMs is similar to that of the so-called "resident monocytes," a monocyte population distinct from the classic inflammatory monocytes and thought to comprise precursors of tissue macrophages (19). Previous studies have reported that a subset of monocytes has the ability to differentiate into endothelial cells on an appropriate stimulus and expresses some endothelial cell markers, including Tie2 (20). However, we found that the vast majority of the circulating Tie2+ cells lacked the expression of the endothelial cell/endothelial cell precursor markers VEGFR-2, AC133, CD146 (17), and CD34 (18), whereas they expressed pure hematopoietic markers, such as CD45. Although a certain degree of phenotypical and functional heterogeneity may exist among circulating Tie2+ cells, these data indicate that the prominent fraction of peripheral blood Tie2+ cells are bona fide monocytes.
Interestingly, circulating human TEMs do not express CCR2 (17), the receptor for CCL2 [also known as monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1)], a chemokine that regulates the recruitment of monocytes to inflamed tissues and tumors. Although the recruitment of TEMs to inflamed tissues has yet to be investigated, it is tempting to speculate on the non-MCP-1 circuits that may govern the recruitment of TEMs to tumors . TEMs may be attracted to tumors in a CCR2-independent manner by signals produced by the tumor cells or stromal components of the tumor, such as the blood vessels themselves. For example, as discussed below, Ang-2, a Tie2 ligand up-regulated by tumors, could play a role in this (17, 18).
|
| Role of TEMs in Tumor Angiogenesis: Insights from Mouse Tumor Models |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To investigate the importance of TEMs in tumor angiogenesis, transgenic mice were generated that express the conditionally toxic gene thymidine kinase (tk) under the control of the murine Tie2 promoter/enhancer (Tie2-tk transgenic mice; ref. 15). In this mouse model, proliferating Tie2-expressing cells can be selectively killed by administration of the prodrug ganciclovir (GCV). Hematopoietic progenitors cells from these Tie2-tk transgenic mice were transplanted into wild-type mice and, a few weeks later, inoculated with either s.c. mammary tumors or orthotopic human gliomas. When GCV was given to eliminate TEMs during the early stages of tumor growth, tumors in GCV-treated mice were significantly smaller and less vascularized than those of untreated mice, indicating that TEM depletion was sufficient to inhibit tumor angiogenesis and growth (15). One interesting finding was that TEM elimination did not affect the overall number of TAMs, making it unlikely that TEMs are simply precursors for TAMs or tissue macrophages in general. Rather, it seems from these studies that TEMs represent a distinct monocyte subset with inherent proangiogenic activity. Interestingly, when GCV treatment was halted, s.c. mammary tumors remained dormant for more than 2 weeks before resuming their growth, suggesting that reconstitution of the TEM pool was required before the tumors could switch angiogenesis back on and resume their growth (15).
In addition to TEMs, other studies reported proangiogenic activity of selected myeloid cell subsets in mouse tumors, including VEGFR-1+CD11b+ hematopoietic progenitors, Gr-1+CD11b+ myeloid suppressor cells, and CD11c+MHC-II+ dendritic cell precursors (3). Because many cell surface markers are broadly expressed among myeloid cells, it is difficult to establish whether these proangiogenic cells represent distinct hematopoietic populations, rather than overlapping myeloid cell subsets, possibly comprising the TEMs.
Because some TEMs preferentially localize to the vicinity of tumor blood vessels in viable tumor areas (17), it can be envisaged that they may provide paracrine support to nascent blood vessels in these areas during the angiogenic process. In human glioma xenografts, for instance, perivascular TEMs produce high levels of the proangiogenic factor basic fibroblast growth factor (15). As mentioned previously, other studies have suggested that the proangiogenic activity of myeloid cells in tumors involves the production of growth factors and matrix-remodeling proteins that stimulate the angiogenic process in a paracrine manner (3). In addition to these functions, TEMs could function as pathfinders for activated endothelial cells or form provisional endothelium-like structures for blood vessel formation.
| Regulation of TEMs by the Tumor Microenvironment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Lewis and her colleagues have shown that hypoxia up-regulates Tie2 expression on human TEMs (18). Moreover, Naldini's group has shown that TEMs isolated from human tumors express Tie2 to a higher extent than circulating TEMs (17). Together, these findings suggest that hypoxia in the tumor microenvironment may up-regulate Tie2 expression by TEMs, making them more responsive to Ang-2 in hypoxic (i.e., highly angiogenic) tumor areas. Lewis's group showed that Ang-2 also modulates cytokine secretion by TEMs. For example, it inhibits their release of tumor necrosis factor-
(TNF-
), an interesting finding given that elevated levels of TNF-
promote apoptosis of both tumor and endothelial cells (22). The down-regulation of TNF-
by TEMs near Ang-2+ tumor blood vessels may thus enhance tumor and endothelial cell survival, thereby promoting metastasis and angiogenesis. Furthermore, in the presence of hypoxia, Ang-2 inhibits the expression of the antiangiogenic cytokine interleukin-12 by TEMs (18), thereby highlighting an important mechanism by which the tumor microenvironment may down-regulate the antiangiogenic activities of tumor-infiltrating macrophages. It remains to be investigated whether hypoxia, Ang-2, and/or other Tie2 ligands also play a role in regulating the activity of TEMs in tumors.
| Concluding Remarks |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank M.A. Venneri for helpful discussions on the manuscript. C.E. Lewis thanks the Yorkshire Cancer Research and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, United Kingdom, for their generous grant support of her group's work in this and related areas.
Received 5/ 8/07. Revised 6/19/07. Accepted 6/19/07.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Au, J. Tam, D. G. Duda, P.-C. Lin, L. L. Munn, D. Fukumura, and R. K. Jain Paradoxical Effects of PDGF-BB Overexpression in Endothelial Cells on Engineered Blood Vessels In Vivo Am. J. Pathol., July 1, 2009; 175(1): 294 - 302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Jang, Y. J. Koh, N. K. Lim, H. J. Kang, D. H. Kim, S. K. Park, G. M. Lee, C. J. Jeon, and G. Y. Koh Angiopoietin-2 Exocytosis Is Stimulated by Sphingosine-1-Phosphate in Human Blood and Lymphatic Endothelial Cells Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., March 1, 2009; 29(3): 401 - 407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Li, A. Vincent, J. Cates, D. M. Brantley-Sieders, D. B. Polk, and P. P. Young Low Levels of Tumor Necrosis Factor {alpha} Increase Tumor Growth by Inducing an Endothelial Phenotype of Monocytes Recruited to the Tumor Site Cancer Res., January 1, 2009; 69(1): 338 - 348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ryder, R. A Ghossein, J. C M Ricarte-Filho, J. A Knauf, and J. A Fagin Increased density of tumor-associated macrophages is associated with decreased survival in advanced thyroid cancer Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2008; 15(4): 1069 - 1074. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Pollard Macrophages define the invasive microenvironment in breast cancer J. Leukoc. Biol., September 1, 2008; 84(3): 623 - 630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Roy, S. Khanna, C. Rink, S. Biswas, and C. K. Sen Characterization of the acute temporal changes in excisional murine cutaneous wound inflammation by screening of the wound-edge transcriptome Physiol Genomics, July 1, 2008; 34(2): 162 - 184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |