| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Immunology |
1 Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; 2 Departments of Dermatology and Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; 3 Tulane University Health Science Center, New Orleans, Louisiana; and 4 Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Requests for reprints: Weiping Zou, University of Michigan School of Medicine, C560B MSRB II, 1150 West Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0669. Phone: 734-763-6402; Fax: 734-763-0143; E-mail: wzou{at}umich.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Antigen-presenting cells (APC) are critical for initiating and maintaining tumor-associated antigen (TAA)–specific T-cell immunity. Tumor-associated macrophages markedly outnumber other APCs, such as dendritic cells, and represent an abundant population of APCs in solid tumors (13–16). We recently reported that human ovarian cancer–associated B7-H4+ macrophages inhibited TAA-specific T-cell immunity, in part through B7-H4 (5). We have now further quantified B7-H4 expression in tumor and tumor-associated macrophages, and analyzed the relationship between B7-H4 expression, Treg cells, and patient outcome.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Immunofluorescent staining. Immunofluorescence analysis was done as previously described (19). Tissues were stained with mouse anti-human B7-H4 (hH4.1, IgG1, 4 µg/mL; ref. 1), mouse anti-human Ham56 (Ham56, IgM, 1/20; DAKO), followed by Alexa Fluor 488–conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG1 and Alexa Fluor 568–conjugated goat anti-mouse IgM (all 2 µg/mL, Molecular Probes). The same antibody concentrations were used for all the tissue staining throughout this work.
Quantification of B7-H4 expression. B7-H4 expression was detected with the Leica DMIRE2 confocal microscope. Laser intensity was calibrated for each observation session using a control test slide with CaliBRITE beads (Alexa 488, Alexa 568). The intensity of the laser was adjusted to a normalized value of the mean fluorescent intensity (10 ± 0.1) using the same beam settings, Alexa 488 (10%), Alexa 568 (10%), PMT 1 and PMT 2 value (700), offset value PMT 1 and PMT 2 (0), Z thickness (10 µm), number of slices (10), and average of slices (2). Beam settings were adjusted using the slide with the most fluorescent intensity to Alexa 488 29%, PMT1 733, Offset-1; and Alexa 568 23%, PMT2 (701), Offset-1. The scanner was engaged and the peak fluorescence intensity of B7-H4 staining with Alexa 488 was located by adjusting the Z position to reveal the most intense pixel concentration. A series of eight slices containing fields with the most intense pixel concentration were selected with a total Z thickness of 3 µm. Two scans for each of the eight slices were captured and the average projection of all 16 slices was used to quantify mean fluorescent intensity. Five adjacent consecutive fields were captured for each of the specimens.
The Leica Confocal Simulator software contains functions to quantify specific values located in designated regions of interest (ROI). Background fluorescence was normalized adjusting the threshold of the average projection of each series. An ROI with an area of 2,400 ± 100 µm2 was designated in an observably negative stained area of each series average projection. The mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of the background ROI was read by the Leica Simulator software quantify function by adjusting the threshold of the average projection such that the MFI of the ROI was equal to 0.04 ± 0.01. Using the threshold corresponding to the normalized background value, the entire average projection of the captured field area (149,260 µm2) MFI (B7-H4 expression) was read by the Leica quantify function in tumor cells or Ham56+ macrophages and recorded along with the SD of the mean and the intensity skew. The MFI reflected the quantity of mouse anti-human B7-H4 primary bound to antigen and anti-mouse IgG1–Alexa 488 conjugate bound to primary antibody. The SD reflects the variation between fields. The intensity skew reflects the differences in accumulation location of the antibody-bound antigen in each field. Five quantification recordings from each specimen were averaged using Microsoft Excel software.
Tumor environmental cytokines. Tumor tissues, tumor-associated macrophages (CD14+ cells), and blood CD14+ cells were used. Macrophages were sorted from blood and tumor ascites with CD14 expression. The sorted macrophages were stimulated with or without lipopolysaccharide (LPS; 100 ng/mL) for 48 h. The mRNA expression for interleukin (IL)-4, IL-6, IL-10, and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) was detected by RT-PCR as we described (20). IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, and GM-CSF protein were detected by ELISA (R&D Systems).
Regulation of macrophage B7-H4 expression. Fresh blood monocytes, tumor macrophages, and primary ovarian tumor (1 x 106–5 x 106/mL) were sorted (5) and cultured for 72 h in different conditions. Neutralizing monoclonal antibody (mAb) against human IL-6 (anti–IL-6, clone 6708, 500 ng/mL) and IL-10 (anti–IL-10, clone 23738, 50 ng/mL; all from R&D Systems) were used as indicated. Cells were subject to fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis for detecting B7-H4 protein.
Treg cell and monocyte coculture. Blood CD14+ cells (1 x 106/mL) were cultured for 72 h with or without autologous tumor Treg cells (0.5 x 106/mL) in the presence of anti-human CD3 (2.5 µg/mL, clone, UCHT1, BD Biosciences) and anti-human CD28 (1.2 µg/mL, clone CD28.2, BD Biosciences). Cytokines were detected by ELISA (R&D Systems) in the culture supernatants.
Statistical analysis. Differences in cell surface molecule expression were determined by
2 test, and in other variables by unpaired t test, with P < 0.05 considered as significant. Overall patient survival was the interval between diagnosis and death. The known tumor-unrelated death (e.g., intercurrent disease and accidental death) was excluded from death record for this study. Data were censored at the last follow-up for patients who were disease-free or alive at the time of analysis. Spearman correlation coefficients were computed to assess relationships between Treg cells, B7-H4, and overall survival. Median survival times were computed using Kaplan-Meier methods. 95% Confidence intervals were computed where possible. Differences in survival functions were assessed using the log-rank test. Confounding factors were assessed using Cox proportional hazards. Stage was tested in each model; other variables, tumor histology, tumor grade, debulking (optimal versus not), and response to chemotherapy were included in a stepwise modeling procedure. All analyses were done using SAS 8.2 software.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Macrophages also expressed B7-H4 (Fig. 1A). We further quantified the intensity of B7-H4 expression in macrophages in the tumors. Based on the intensity of B7-H4 expression, we divided the samples into two groups, one group with low B7-H4 expression in macrophages and another group with high B7-H4 expression in macrophages. After adjustment for stage using Cox proportional hazards regression, low and high B7H4 groups had significantly different survival times (P < 0.0004; Fig. 1B). The hazard ratio was equal to 3.9 (95% confidence interval, 1.8-8.4). The different survival times remained significant in patients with advanced-stage diseases (Fig. 1C).
Stage and Treg cells are the well-defined variables affecting patient survival (18). We observed that the number of B7-H4+ macrophages was significantly increased in advanced disease stages (Fig. 1D). After adjustment for stage and Treg cells, there were still significant differences between the low and high B7-H4 expression groups (P = 0.0171). Hazard ratio was equal to 2.7 with 95% confidence interval of 1.2 to 6.1. The data indicate that B7-H4 in macrophages, rather than tumor cells, is related to patient outcome, suggesting the pathologic relevance of macrophage B7-H4.
Relationship between tumor Treg cells and B7-H4+ macrophages. We previously showed a mechanistic link between Treg cells and APCs (21). We showed that normal Treg cells conveyed suppressive activity to APCs through B7-H4 induction. Functional Treg cells were found in the tumor environment and predict patient survival (18). B7-H4+ macrophages were observed in human ovarian tumor and suppressed TAA-specific T-cell immunity (5). We thus tested the potential relationship between tumor Treg cells, identified as CD4+FOXP3+ T cells, and B7-H4+ macrophages. Spearman correlation of Treg cells and B7-H4+ macrophages was 0.39 (P = 0.0008; Fig. 1E). Thus, Treg cells and B7-H4+ macrophages are positively associated in ovarian tumors.
Tumor macrophages stimulate B7-H4 expression in an autocrine manner. We previously showed that macrophages in ovarian tumors expressed B7-H4, and that IL-10 and IL-6 in the tumor ascites stimulated B7-H4 expression (5). To determine the cellular source of IL-10 and IL-6 for B7-H4 induction in tumor environment, we incubated fresh blood monocytes from normal donors with primary ovarian tumor cells or tumor-associated macrophages. Unexpectedly, tumor macrophages, but not normal macrophages and primary tumor, significantly stimulated macrophage B7-H4 expression (Fig. 2A and B and not shown; n = 6, *P < 0.05). Consistent with previous findings (17), ovarian tumor macrophages, but not normal macrophages, spontaneously expressed IL-10 and IL-6 (Fig. 2C and D). LPS stimulation further enhanced the production of IL-10 and IL-6 by tumor-associated macrophages and normal macrophages (Fig. 2D). We next observed that B7-H4 induction mediated by tumor macrophages was partially and significantly reversed by anti–IL-10 neutralizing mAb and anti–IL-6 neutralizing mAb. Simultaneous blockade of IL-6 and IL-10 completely blocked B7-H4 induction by tumor-associated macrophages (Fig. 2A and B). GM-CSF and IL-4 reduces B7-H4 induction in APCs (5). We detected limited levels of GM-CSF and IL-4 in fresh ovarian tumor tissues (not shown; ref. 5). Thus, our published data (5) and current work indicate that tumor macrophages stimulate B7-H4 expression in an autocrine/paracrine manner through spontaneous production of IL-6 and IL-10.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Consistent with previous reports, we show that primary ovarian cancer cells (4–9) and ovarian cancer–associated macrophages (5) express variable levels of B7-H4. Interestingly, the intensity of B7-H4 in macrophages, rather than tumor cells, is related to patient outcome. It has been reported that low levels of B7-H4 protein were found in all sera from ovarian cancer patients. The levels of serum B7-H4 were significantly higher in patients with ovarian carcinoma than healthy controls or women with benign gynecologic diseases (8). The median B7-H4 concentration in endometrioid and serous histotypes was higher than in mucinous histotypes (8). It remains unknown whether serum B7-H4 is derived from tumor or/and other cells, such as macrophages, and if so, how B7-H4 is released into sera. Nonetheless, the data suggest the pathologic relevance of B7-H4 in human ovarian cancer.
High levels of B7-H4 were found in non–small-cell lung cancer (10), ductal and lobular breast cancer (9, 11), and renal cell carcinoma (12). Vascular endothelial cells also express B7-H4 in renal cell carcinoma (12). Although we have observed that tumor B7-H4 expression is not associated to tumor pathology and clinical outcome in patients with ovarian cancer (this study), it seems that tumor B7-H4 expression was associated with adverse clinical and pathologic features, including constitutional symptoms, tumor necrosis, and advanced tumor size, stage, and grade in patients with renal cell carcinoma (12). It is unknown whether tumor-associated APCs express B7-H4 in renal cell carcinoma (12). Although the functional activity, the regulatory mechanism, and the signal pathways of tumor B7-H4 remain to be defined, the broad expression of B7-H4 in human tumor suggests a potential role for this protein in human tumor biology.
In addition to tumor cells, ovarian cancer–associated macrophages express B7-H4 and significantly inhibit TAA-specific T-cell proliferation, cytokine production, and cytotoxicity in vitro. These B7-H4+ macrophages also inhibit TAA-specific immunity in vivo and foster tumor growth in chimeric severe combined immunodeficient/nonobese diabetic mice bearing autologous human tumors, despite the presence of potent TAA-specific effector T cells (5, 21). We now show that the intensity of B7-H4 expression of macrophages is associated with tumor-infiltrating Treg cells and negatively predict ovarian cancer patient survival. These data indicate that macrophage B7-H4 signals contribute to tumor immunopathology.
Recombinant and tumor environmental IL-6 and IL-10 stimulate APC B7-H4 expression, whereas dendritic cell differentiation cytokines GM-CSF and IL-4 suppress APC B7-H4 induction (5, 21). We reason that tumor cells, tumor-associated macrophages, and regulatory T cells may be the source for IL-6 and IL-10 (17, 18). In support of this, we observed that tumor macrophages spontaneously produce IL-6 and IL-10 and stimulate B7-H4 expression in an autocrine/paracrine manner. We further show that tumor-associated Treg cells trigger macrophage to produce IL-10 and IL-6, and IL-10 and IL-6 in turn stimulate B7-H4 expression on APCs. Thus, our data mechanistically link IL-10, B7-H4, Treg cells, and APCs in the context of tumor immunity, and suggest a complicated suppressive network in the tumor microenvironment (24, 25). Targeting this network may be therapeutically meaningful in treating patients with cancer.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received 5/23/07. Revised 6/15/07. Accepted 7/ 9/07.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Barber, A. Rynda, and C. L. Sentman Chimeric NKG2D Expressing T Cells Eliminate Immunosuppression and Activate Immunity within the Ovarian Tumor Microenvironment J. Immunol., December 1, 2009; 183(11): 6939 - 6947. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Wang, R. Lau, D. Yu, W. Zhu, A. Korman, and J. Weber PD1 blockade reverses the suppression of melanoma antigen-specific CTL by CD4+CD25Hi regulatory T cells Int. Immunol., September 1, 2009; 21(9): 1065 - 1077. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Kryczek, R. Liu, G. Wang, K. Wu, X. Shu, W. Szeliga, L. Vatan, E. Finlayson, E. Huang, D. Simeone, et al. FOXP3 Defines Regulatory T Cells in Human Tumor and Autoimmune Disease Cancer Res., May 1, 2009; 69(9): 3995 - 4000. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |