| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Priority Reports |
and Hdm2
1 Departments of Radiation Oncology and Pharmacology, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, 2 Department of Molecular Genetics, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, and Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio; 3 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Indiana University School of Medicine, and the Walther Cancer Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana; and 4 Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
Requests for reprints: Lindsey D. Mayo, Herman B Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202. Phone: 317-278-3173; Fax: 317-278-5413.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(HIF1
) binds to Hdm2 in the domain designated to bind p53. HIF1
and p53 share a conserved motif that is required to bind Hdm2. Distinct complexes form between Hdm2-HIF1
and Hdm2-p53 as determined by immunoprecipitation of nuclear extracts and in vitro. The Hdm2 antagonist Nutlin3 prevents the association between Hdm2 and HIF1
. The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene is a transcriptional target of HIF1
, and under normoxic or hypoxic conditions, Hdm2 increases HIF1
activity to induce VEGF production. Blocking the association of Hdm2 and HIF1
by Nutlin3, or ablating Hdm2 expression, diminished the level of VEGF under conditions of normoxia or hypoxia. Our findings establish a unique role for Nutlin3 in attenuating VEGF induction by preventing the association of Hdm2 with HIF1
. [Cancer Res 2007;67(2):4504] | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mdm2 will interact with numerous proteins, yet a select few interact within the p53-binding domain. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1
(HIF1
) has been shown to form a complex with Mdm2 or its human homologue Hdm2 (11, 12). In one report, increased association of HIF1
-Hdm2 protected p53 from Hdm2-mediated degradation (13). HIF1
is a transcription factor that regulates genes, the products of which are involved in metabolism and angiogenesis (11, 12). Hdm2-HIF1
association increases the induction of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).
We show that the p53-binding domain of Hdm2 associates in the NH2 terminus of HIF1
,which shares a highly conserved motif with p53. HIF1
and Hdm2 form a distinct nuclear complex independent of p53. Furthermore, the Hdm2 antagonist Nutlin3 prevents the association of Hdm2 and HIF1
and inhibits the induction of VEGF. This work shows that Nutlin3 regulates the activities of Hdm2 involved in inducing the proangiogenic factor VEGF.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Immunoprecipitation and Western blotting. Antibodies to HIF1
(Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO), Cdc2, p53 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), and Hdm2 (2A10 and IF2, Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA), were used for immunoprecipitations from 100 µg of nuclear extract isolated using the per-NUC/Cyto kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Briefly, 100 µg of nuclear extract was added to the antibody preadsorbed to protein A/G agarose, and the volume of the incubate was adjusted to 1 mL using the NP40 lysis buffer [50 mmol/L Tris (pH 7.6), 150 mmol/L NaCl, 0.5% NP40, 10 mmol/L sodium PPi, 10 mmol/L sodium fluoride, 1 mmol/L sodium orthovanadate, supplemented with 10 µg/mL aprotinin, leupeptin, and pepstatin A and 2 mmol/L phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride]. After 1 h of incubation at 4°C, the incubates were centrifuged, the supernatant was siphoned, and 1 mL NP40 lysis buffer was added to the pellet, which was rotated at 4°C. This wash procedure was repeated thrice, and then Western blots were prepared. Blots were probed with a cocktail of 2A10, SMP14, and IF-2 for Hdm2, or with VEGF or glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase antibodies, followed by secondary antibody coupled to horseradish peroxidase and detected by chemiluminescence reagent.
Recombinant proteins. HIF1
and Hdm2 (V5 tagged) were produced using a rabbit reticulocyte lysate system (Promega, Madison, WI), except that the amino acid mixes were combined (cysteine and methonine) such that the reactions produced nonradiolabeled products. The proteins were mixed, and Hdm2 was purified by immunoprecipitation using a V5 antibody and washed with the buffers described above. HIF1
cDNA was digested with Sma1-Sal1 restriction enzymes. The Sma1-Sal1 fragment was ligated in frame into the pGEX4t-1 glutathione S-transferase (GST) expression vector. The Quik change site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) mutated phenylalanine 37 to tyrosine in HIF1
. Mutagenesis was confirmed by sequencing. GST, GST-HIF1
, or GST-F37Y proteins were produced in bacteria and purified with glutathione beads and then incubated with recombinant human Hdm2, produced as previously described (14), and washed with PBS, and Western blot analysis was conducted.
Gene reporter assays. LipofectAMINE was used to transfect cells with Rous sarcoma virus ß-galactosidase construct and vegf or epo promoters upstream of the luciferase gene, generous gifts from Amato Giaccia (Stanford University, Stanford, CA) and Gregg Semenza (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD), respectively. Thirty-six hours after transfection, the cells were harvested, and luciferase and ß-galactosidase were assayed in a luminometer. The ratio of luciferase to ß-galactosidase activity was calculated, and fold induction was determined relative to control. Each data point represents the mean of results from three independent transfections.
shRNA to Hdm2 in U87 cells. The virus was produced as previously described (15). U87 cells were infected with three rounds of virus encoding scrambled (shScr) or two sequences directed to Hdm2 (ShA/C; plasmids encoding the shRNA were a generous gift from Richard Iggo, Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research, Epalinges, Switzerland) and selected with puromycin. The population of puromycin-resistant cells was used to conduct experiments.
| Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
. Several groups have reported the association of Hdm2 and HIF1
; however, the domains or motifs required for the association were not determined. To determine the domain required for the association of HIF1
and Hdm2, carboxyl-terminal truncations of Hdm2 (
Ring finger,
Zinc finger), and the 110 amino acid p53 interaction domain of Hdm2 were produced in a rabbit reticulocyte lysate system (Fig. 1A
). The data in Fig. 1A show that HIF1
binds to the to p53-binding domain of Hdm2 (Fig. 1A).
|
and p53. p53 and other proteins (p73 and E2F) that bind to the NH2 terminus of Hdm2 share a conserved motif (Fig. 1B; ref. 16). Upon examination of the HIF1
amino acid sequence, we identified the conserved motif in the NH2 terminus (Fig. 1B). For the p53-Hdm2 interaction, phenylalanine 19 of p53 inserts into the hydrophobic pocket of Hdm2 and makes van der Waals contacts with isoleucine 61 and glycine 58 (16). Because phenylalanine is important for the p53-Hdm2 association, we generated a HIF1
mutant whereby phenylalanine 37 was changed to a tyrosine (F37Y). The first 245 amino acids of HIF1
and F37Y were produced as GST fusion proteins and incubated with recombinant Hdm2. Western blot analysis showed that Hdm2 bound GST-HIF-1
, but not GST or GST-F37Y (Fig. 2B
), demonstrating the dependence of the conserved motif in HIF1
.
|
compete for the same binding site in Hdm2, we did in vitro binding assay. Recombinant Hdm2 was preincubated with 10 pg, 100 pg, or 1 ng of recombinant p53. The Hdm2-p53 reactions were then added to GST-HIF1
-glutathione beads. The data in Fig. 2A show by Western blot analyses that p53 binding to Hdm2 prevents the association with HIF1
, further demonstrating the competition of both proteins for binding to Hdm2 in the p53 interaction domain.
To examine the complex formation of HIF1
bound to Hdm2 in vivo, mouse embryo fibroblasts p53/ (MEF), HEPG2, and MCF7 cells were grown under normoxia, and nuclear extracts were isolated and used to purify the HIF1
and Mdm2 by immunoprecipitation. Western blots show that Mdm2 forms a complex with HIF1
in the absence of p53 (Fig. 2B) in MEFs. Immunoprecipitations of nuclear extracts from HEPG2 and MCF7 cells show that both p53 and HIF1
complex with Hdm2. However, HIF1
did not copurify with p53, and p53 did not copurify with HIF1
. Having shown a p53-independent association of Hdm2 and HIF1
under normoxia, we tested for the interaction of the proteins isolated from MEFs, p53/ MEFs, H1299 (p53 null), and T47D cells (mutant p53) grown under hypoxia. The Hdm2/HIF1
complex was isolated from nuclear fractions of each cell type and Western blotted for HIF1
and Hdm2/Mdm2 (Fig. 2C). The results in Figs. 1 and 2 show that Mdm2 or Hdm2 (human homologue) complex with HIF1
, and this complex does not copurify p53, and immunopurified p53 does not copurify HIF1
. These observations are incongruent with a report that shows a trimeric complex of p53/HIF1
/Mdm2 isolated from whole cell lysates (11). There could be a simple explanation for the different observation. The authors only used an Mdm2 antibody to show a complex of p53 and HIF1
, which would pull down both p53 and HIF1
and would not show the distinct complexes.
VEGF is regulated by loss of Hdm2 or Nutlin3 treatment, which prevents Hdm2-HIF1
complex formation. Experiments were conducted with mdm2-deficient MEFs to assess the functional aspect of the HIF1
-Hdm2 complex. As knock-out of mdm2 is embryonically lethal, experiments were conducted with p53/ and p53/mdm2/ MEF. By comparison with MEFs, HIF1
activity was greater in p53/ MEFs grown under normoxia or hypoxia as measured by vegf reporter assay (Fig. 3A
). Transactivation of the vegf reporter was diminished in p53/mdm2/ MEFs (Fig. 3A), suggesting a molecular role for Mdm2 in the production of VEGF (Fig. 2). To show that this observation was not limited to murine cells, U87 cells were generated with a scrambled shRNA (scrRNA) or shRNA directed to Hdm2 (A/C). U87 cells under hypoxic conditions did not induce VEGF when ShRNA decreased Hdm2. U87 cells are wild type for p53, and to eliminate the possibility of p53 regulating HIF1
, we used H1299 cells that lack p53. Transient overexpression of Hdm2 under condition of normoxia or hypoxia in H1299 cells augmented vegf promoter activity, whereas the expression of Hdm2 in the reverse orientation (2mdH) diminished reporter activity (Fig. 3C and D). Although the Hdm2-HIF1
complex led to an increase in VEGF production, it is not clear how the complex works (17). Both Hdm2 and HIF1
bind with p300. Hdm2 may be involved in the formation of a p300-Hdm2-HIF1
complex that would be responsible for inducing HIF1
target genes. Further investigation is required to resolve the functional aspect of this complex.
|
-responsive promoter (erythropoietin) linked to luciferase (epo). Nutlin3 decreased the induction of the epo promoter (Fig. 3D) similar to that of the vegf promoter (Fig. 3C) under conditions of normoxia or hypoxia.
Given that Nutlin3 diminished vegf and epo promoter activity in transient assays, we next examined in vitro how Nutlin3 would affect the formation of the HIF1
-Hdm2 complex. Nutlin3 (1 nmol/L, 10 nmol/L, and 1 µmol/L) was preincubated with recombinant Hdm2 and incubated with GST-HIF1
or p53. Complexes were purified with glutathione beads (HIF1
) or DO-1 agarose beads (p53) and analyzed by Western blot. The data in Fig. 4A
show that Nutlin3 prevented the association of p53 or HIF1
with Hdm2. Next, we examined the ability of Nutlin3 to influence the Hdm2-HIF1
association by immunoprecipitation of Hdm2 from nuclear extracts isolated from cells under hypoxic conditions in the absence or presence of 10 µmol/L Nutlin3. The data in Fig. 4B show that the nuclear HIF1
-Hdm2 complex was disrupted by the presence of Nutlin3 in H1299 cells. Similar results were observed in U87 cells (wild-type p53), in that Nutlin3 prevented the complex formation of Hdm2 with HIF1
when Hdm2 was immunoprecipitated (Fig. 4D). An examination of endogenous VEGF levels in U87 cells shows diminished levels when cells are incubated under normoxic or hypoxic conditions in the presence of Nutlin3 (Fig. 4D). Thus, Nutlin3 is able to block the formation of the complex of Hdm2 and HIF1
, and this disruption has a dramatic effect on the levels of VEGF in the absence or presence of p53.
|
and mediating VEGF induction.
Hdm2 plays a role in tumorigenesis that can be independent of p53. Indeed, hemangiosarcoma, a highly vascularized tumor, was observed with high frequency in Mdm2 transgenic mice. Moreover, tumor development in these mice was independent of p53 (19). About 70% of patients with hemangiosarcoma have high levels of VEGF (20). These two studies and our work presented herein support a role of Hdm2 in promoting the angiogenic factor VEGF. The oncogenic activity of Hdm2 may manifest itself by playing a dual role in blocking p53 activity while also enhancing HIF1
activity. However, targeting Hdm2 using Nutlin3 or Nutlin3-like molecules in the treatment of patients may target the tumor by reactivating p53 to bring about a decrease in tumor volume, which has been shown in xenograph models, and by inhibiting HIF1
-mediated angiogenesis.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 7/21/06. Revised 10/19/06. Accepted 11/13/06.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
. Genes Dev 2000;14:3444.
expression. Mol Cell Biol 2004;24:290514.
and Mdm2 modulate p53 function. J Biol Chem 2003;278:135958.
interaction in tumor cells during hypoxia. J Cell Physiol 2005;204:3649.[CrossRef][Medline]This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Kumamoto, E. A. Spillare, K. Fujita, I. Horikawa, T. Yamashita, E. Appella, M. Nagashima, S. Takenoshita, J. Yokota, and C. C. Harris Nutlin-3a Activates p53 to Both Down-regulate Inhibitor of Growth 2 and Up-regulate mir-34a, mir-34b, and mir-34c Expression, and Induce Senescence Cancer Res., May 1, 2008; 68(9): 3193 - 3203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Supiot, R. P. Hill, and R. G. Bristow Nutlin-3 radiosensitizes hypoxic prostate cancer cells independent of p53 Mol. Cancer Ther., April 1, 2008; 7(4): 993 - 999. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Secchiero, F. Corallini, E. Rimondi, C. Chiaruttini, M. G. di Iasio, A. Rustighi, G. Del Sal, and G. Zauli Activation of the p53 pathway down-regulates the osteoprotegerin expression and release by vascular endothelial cells Blood, February 1, 2008; 111(3): 1287 - 1294. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. A. Carroll and M. Ashcroft Regulation of Angiogenic Factors by HDM2 in Renal Cell Carcinoma Cancer Res., January 15, 2008; 68(2): 545 - 552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |