Cancer Research Cancer Epigenetics  Jordan
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

Cancer Research 67, 10720, November 15, 2007. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2411
© 2007 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correction (v68,p3549)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fu, L.
Right arrow Articles by Guan, X.-Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fu, L.
Right arrow Articles by Guan, X.-Y.

Molecular Biology, Pathobiology, and Genetics

Characterization of a Novel Tumor-Suppressor Gene PLC{delta}1 at 3p22 in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Li Fu1, Yan-Ru Qin4, Dan Xie5, Liang Hu1, Dora L. Kwong1, Gopesh Srivastava2, Sai Wah Tsao3 and Xin-Yuan Guan1,5

Departments of 1 Clinical Oncology, 2 Pathology, and 3 Anatomy, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China; 4 Department of Clinical Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China; and 5 State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Cancer Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China

Requests for reprints: Xin-Yuan Guan, Department of Clinical Oncology, The University of Hong Kong, Room L10-56, Laboratory Block, 21 Sassoon Road, Pokfulam, Hong Kong. Fax: 852-28169126; E-mail: xyguan{at}hkucc.hku.hk.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Deletion of 3p is one of the most frequent chromosomal alterations in many solid tumors, including esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), suggesting the existence of one or more tumor-suppressor genes at 3p. Recently, our loss of heterozygosity study revealed that 3p22 was frequently deleted in ESCC and a candidate tumor-suppressor gene (TSG), phospholipase C-{delta}1 (PLC{delta}1), was identified within the 3p22 region. In this study, absent expression of PLC{delta}1 was detected in 26 of 50 (52%) primary ESCCs and 4 of 9 (44.4%) ESCC cell lines, which was significantly associated with DNA copy number loss and promoter hypermethylation (P < 0.05). Functional studies showed that PLC{delta}1 was able to suppress both in vitro and in vivo tumorigenic ability of ESCC cells, including foci formation, colony formation in soft agar, and tumor formation in nude mice. The tumor-suppressive mechanism of PLC{delta}1 was associated with its role in the cell cycle arrest at the G1-S checkpoint by up-regulation of p21 and down-regulation of phosphorylated Akt (Ser473). In addition, down-regulation of PLC{delta}1 protein was significantly correlated with ESCC metastasis (P = 0.014), which was associated with its function in increasing cell adhesion and inhibiting cell mobility. Taken together, our results suggest that PLC{delta}1 plays an important suppressive role in the development and progression of ESCC. [Cancer Res 2007;67(22):10720–5]


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), the major histologic subtype of esophageal cancer, is one of the most common malignancies and ranked as the sixth leading cause of cancer death worldwide (1). ESCC is characterized by its remarkable geographic distribution, and >50% of ESCC cases in the world occur in China. Linzhou (formerly Linxian) and the nearby counties in Henan province of Northern China have the highest incidence of ESCC in the world (1, 2). As other solid tumors, the pathogenesis of ESCC is also a long process with multiple genetic alterations, including inactivation of tumor-suppressor genes and activation of oncogenes. Therefore, identification of the recurrent genetic changes of ESCC is critical for the isolation of ESCC-related genes.

Deletion of 3p is one of the most common genetic alterations in ESCC detected by comparative genomic hybridization (35) and loss of heterozygosity (LOH; refs. 6). In our recent study, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) mass spectrophotometric genotyping with 350 SNP markers was used to detect minimal deleted region at 3p in 100 ESCC cases and four minimal deleted regions, including 3p22-21.3, were detected.6 One candidate TSG, phospholipase C (PLC)-{delta}1 (PLC{delta}1), was identified within the 3p22 region. Loss of one copy of PLC{delta}1 gene was detected in 39 of 97 (40.2%) ESCCs by quantitative real-time PCR.6 PLC{delta}1 gene is composed of 16 exons and encodes a protein of 756 amino acids. PLC{delta}1 belongs to a mammalian phosphoinositide-specific PLC superfamily. To date, 11 PLC isozymes have been cloned from mammalian cells, which can be divided into four groups (ß, {gamma}, {delta}, and {varepsilon}) based on their sequence homology, structure, and activation mechanisms (7, 8). The main function of PLC enzymes is to hydrolyze the minor lipid component, phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2), and release the second messenger, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate, which can release calcium from intracellular stores, and diacylglycerol, which mediates the activation of protein kinase C (PKC; refs. 9, 10). PLCß1 and PLC{gamma}1 isoforms have been linked with PKC activation (11, 12); however, the direct link between PLC{delta}1 and PKC is still unclear.

Although the expression levels, regulation mechanisms, and biochemical features of PLC{delta}1 have been widely studied, its role in cancer development is still unclear. In the present study, PLC{delta}1 expression pattern in primary ESCCs and ESCC cell lines was investigated. Tumor-suppressive function of PLC{delta}1 was shown by both in vitro and in vivo assays. In addition, down-regulation of PLC{delta}1 protein was associated with ESCC metastasis. The tumor-suppressive mechanism of PLC{delta}1 was also addressed.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cell lines and primary tumor specimens. Three Chinese ESCC cell lines (HKESC1, EC18, and EC109) and six Japanese ESCC cell lines (KYSE30, KYSE140, KYSE180, KYSE410, KYSE510, and KYSE520; ref. 13) were kindly provided by Professor Srivastava (Department of Pathology, The University of Hong Kong). Two immortalized esophageal cell lines (NE1 and NE3) were kindly provided by Professor Tsao (Department of Anatomy, The University of Hong Kong). The primary ESCC tumor tissues and their paired nontumorous tissues were collected immediately after surgical resection at Linzhou Cancer Hospital (Henan, China). Samples used in this study were approved by the Committees for Ethical Review of Research involving Human Subjects at Zhengzhou University and The University of Hong Kong.

Semiquantitative reverse transcription-PCR. Total RNA was extracted from cell lines and frozen ESCC tissues by the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). Reverse transcription of total RNA (2 µg) was done using an Advantage RT for PCR kit (Clontech), and cDNA was subjected to PCR for 28 cycles of amplification with the following pair of primers: PLCDFw, 5'-GGCGTCCCCCTACCCTGTCATCC and PLCDRv, 5'-TGCTGCACACGGCTCCTCACTG. GAPDH gene was used as a control.

Bisulfite treatment and promoter methylation analysis. Genomic DNA was extracted from tumors, normal tissues, and cell lines by phenol-chloroform method followed by bisulfite modification. Methylation specific-PCR (MSP) and bisulfite genomic sequencing (BGS) were done as previously described (14). The bisulfite-treated DNA was amplified with methylation-specific primer set, PLCDm3: 5'-GGTTGGAAGTTTGGACGTC, PLCDm4: 5'-TAACCCGAACCAACGAACG, or the unmethylation-specific primer set, PLCDu3: 5'-GTGGTTGGAAGTTTGGATGTT, PLCDu4: 5'-CCTAACCCAAACCAACAAACA. A 350-bp DNA fragment (–496 to –147) containing 36 CpG sites was amplified by BGS primers, BGS1: 5'-TTTAGGTATTGTTT TTTGAAGATT and BGS2: 5'-AAAAACTAACCAACCCTAACC.

Fluorescent in situ hybridization. A bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clone containing PLC{delta}1 gene (RP11-213K17) was used to study DNA copy number change in KYSE30 cells. BAC probe and chromosome 3 centromere probe were labeled with Spectrum Orange-dUTP and Spectrum Green-dUTP (Vysis), respectively. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) reaction was done as described previously (15).

5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine treatment. To study whether demethylation could restore PLC{delta}1 expression in KYSE30 cells, 2 x 105 cells were treated with 50 µmol/L 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (5-aza-dC; Sigma-Aldrich Corporation) for 3 days, with changing of 5-aza-dC and medium every 24 h. Total RNA was then extracted and PLC{delta}1 expression was detected by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR).

Tissue microarrays and immunohistochemistry. A total of 221 formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded ESCC tumor specimens used in this study were obtained from the archives of Cancer Center, Sun Yat-Sen University (Guangzhou, China). Two tissue microarrays contained 442 primary ESCC tumor samples (duplicate 0.6-mm tissue cores for each ESCC) and 52 paired nontumorous esophageal tissues were constructed according to a method described previously (16). Multiple sections (5 µm thick) were cut from the tissue microarray blocks and mounted on microscope slides.

Immunohistochemical staining was done using standard streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase complex method (16). In brief, tissue microarray section was deparaffinized and nonspecific bindings were blocked with 10% normal rabbit serum for 10 min. The tissue microarray section was then incubated with anti-PLC{delta}1 polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.; 1:50 dilution) at 37°C for 60 min, and subsequently incubated with biotinylated goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin at a concentration of 1:100 for 30 min at 37°C.

Tumor-suppressive function of PLC{delta}1. To test tumor-suppressive function of PLC{delta}1, PLC{delta}1 was PCR amplified, cloned into pcDNA3.1/V5-His TOPO TA vector (Invitrogen), and transfected into ESCC cell line KYSE30 cells. Stable PLC{delta}1-expressing clones (PLC{delta}1-c6 and PLC{delta}1-c7) were selected for further study. Blank vector–transfected KYSE30 cells (Vec-30) were used as control. For foci formation assay, 1 x 103 PLC{delta}1-expressing cells (PLC{delta}1-c6 or PLC{delta}1-c7) or Vec-30 cells were plated in wells of a six-well plate. After 7 days culture, surviving colonies (>50 cells per colony) were counted with Giemsa staining. Triplicate independent experiments were done.

Colony formation in soft agar was carried out by growing 5 x 103 cells in 0.4% bactoagar on a bottom layer of solidified 0.6% bactoagar in six-well plates. After 3 weeks, colonies consisted of >80 cells were counted and expressed as the means ± SD of triplicate within the same experiment.

Cell growth rate of PLC{delta}1-expressing clones (PLC{delta}1-c6 and PLC{delta}1-c7) and control Vec-30 cells were detected by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. Cells were seeded in 96-well plate at a density of 1 x 103 per well. The cell growth rate was detected using cell proliferation MTT kit (Sigma) according to the manufacturer's instruction. Triplicate independent experiments were done.

Tumor formation in nude mice. In vivo tumor-suppressive ability of PLC{delta}1 was investigated by tumor xenograft experiment. About 2 x 106 PLC{delta}1-expressing KYSE30 cells or control Vec-30 cells were injected s.c. into the right and left hind legs of 4-week-old nude mice (10 mice for PLC{delta}1-c6 cells and 10 mice for PLC{delta}1-c7 cells), respectively. Tumor formation in nude mice was monitored over a 4-week period. The tumor volume was calculated by the formula V = 0.5 x L x W2 (17).

Cell adhesion assay. Cell adhesion ability was measured by seeding 5,000 cells into 96-well plates precoated with 10 g/mL collagen I (Invitrogen). After incubation for 30 to 90 min, the cells were gently washed with 1x PBS. The number of adherent cells was determined by incubation with 0.1% crystal violet for 30 min, followed by extraction in 10% acetic acid overnight and spectrophotometric analysis at 540 nm. The experiment was done thrice in replicates of six wells.

Wound-healing assay. Cell mobility was studied by a scratch wound-healing assay. PLC{delta}1-c6 or Vec-30 cells were cultured in a six-well plate until confluent. The cell layer was wounded using a sterile tip. After incubation for 24 h, the cells were photographed under a phase-contrast microscope. The experiment was done in triplicate.

Cell cycle analysis. PLC{delta}1-c6 or Vec-30 cells (1 x 106 to 2 x 106) were cultured in RPMI medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Serum was withdrawn from culture medium when cells were 70% confluent. After 72 h, 10% FBS was added in the medium for an additional 12 h. Cells were fixed in 70% ethanol, stained with propidium iodide, and DNA content was analyzed by Cytomics FC (Beckman Coulter).

Western blot analysis. Western blotting was done according to the standard protocol with antibodies for PLC{delta}1, cyclin D1, and ß-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology); and p21, total Akt, and Akt (Ser473; Cell Signaling Technology).

Statistical analysis. Statistical analysis was done with the SPSS standard version 13.0. The statistical significance of the correlations between PLC{delta}1 expression and promoter methylation, LOH, as well as clinicopathologic characteristics were assessed by {chi}2 test or Fisher's exact tests. Results expressed as mean ± SD were analyzed using the Student's t test. Differences were considered significant when P value was <0.05.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Frequent down-regulation of PLC{delta}1 in ESCCs. The gene expression of PLC{delta}1 in nine ESCC cell lines and 50 primary ESCC tumors and their paired nontumorous tissues were studied by semiquantitative RT-PCR. Expression of PLC{delta}1 was observed in all 50 tested nontumorous tissues. However, absent expression of PLC{delta}1 was detected in 26 of 50 (52%) primary ESCCs (Fig. 1A ). Similarly, absent expression of PLC{delta}1 was detected in four of nine (EC109, KYSE30, 180, and 510) ESCC cell lines (Fig. 1B). PLC{delta}1 expression in protein level was also studied using ESCC tissue microarray containing 221 ESCC cases. Expression of PLC{delta}1 was detected in all 26 informative normal esophageal epithelia. However, absent expression of PLC{delta}1 protein was detected in 82 of 197 (41.6%) informative ESCC cases (Fig. 1C).


Figure 1
View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1. Down-regulation of PLC{delta}1 in ESCC. PLC{delta}1 expression was frequently down-regulated in primary ESCCs (A) and ESCC cell lines (B) detected by RT-PCR. For primary ESCCs, expression of PLC{delta}1 in tumor tissues (T) was compared with their paired nontumorous tissues (N). Two immortalized esophageal epithelial cell lines, NE1 and NE2, were used as normal controls. GAPDH was used as a loading control. C, representative of PLC{delta}1 expression in a pair of ESCC (right) and adjacent normal tissue (left) detected by immunostaining with anti-PLC{delta}1 antibody (brown). The slide was counterstained with hematoxylin. Original magnification, x400.

 
Furthermore, clinical association study showed that the frequency of absent PLC{delta}1 expression was significantly higher in primary ESCCs with lymph node metastasis (49 of 97 cases, 51%) than that in primary ESCCs without metastasis (33 of 100, 33%, P = 0.014, Fisher's exact test). No significant association was observed between down-regulation of PLC{delta}1 and other clinicopathologic variables (Table 1 ).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Association of loss of PLC{delta}1 expression with clinicopathologic characteristics

 
Frequent methylation of PLC{delta}1 promoter region in ESCC. To determine whether down-regulation of PLC{delta}1 in ESCC is caused by hypermethylation in its promoter region, the methylation status of PLC{delta}1 was analyzed. MSP using methylation- or unmethylation-specific primers was done to investigate the methylation status of PLC{delta}1. In four ESCC cell lines (EC109, KYSE30, KYSE180, and KYSE510) with absent expression of PLC{delta}1, only methylated allele of PLC{delta}1 was detected (Fig. 2A ). In two cell lines (KYSE140 and KYSE410) with normal or weak expression of PLC{delta}1, both methylated and unmethylated alleles were detected. In contrast, no methylated allele was observed in immortalized esophageal epithelial cells (NE1) and ESCC cell lines (HKESC1, EC18, and KYSE520) with PLC{delta}1 expression (Fig. 2A). To further explore the methylation details of PLC{delta}1 in ESCC, three ESCC cell lines with different degrees of PLC{delta}1 methylation were characterized by BGS. BGS results revealed a high density of methylated CpG sites in KYSE30 cell line with absent expression of PLC{delta}1, whereas most of the CpG sites were unmethylated in the immortalized esophageal epithelial cells (NE1) and HKESC1 cell line with PLC{delta}1 expression (Fig. 2B). These results showed that methylation of the PLC{delta}1 promoter was associated with its transcriptional repression.


Figure 2
View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2. Hypermethylation of promoter region of PLC{delta}1 in ESCC. A, detection of promoter methylation of PLC{delta}1 in ESCC cell lines by MSP. Immortalized esophageal epithelial cell line NE1 was used as normal control. M, methylated allele; U, unmethylated allele. B, high-resolution mapping of the methylation status of individual CpG site in the PLC{delta}1 promoter by BGS in ESCC cell lines (KYSE30, HKESC1, and KYSE140) and normal cell line (NE1). A 350-bp region spanning the CpG island with 36 CpG sites was analyzed. Each CpG site analyzed is shown at the top row as a short vertical bar. Percentage methylation was determined as percentage of methylated CpGs from 8 to 10 randomly sequenced clones. Black and white circle, completely methylated or completely unmethylated CpGs, respectively. Concentric circles, partially methylated CpGs. C, representative MSP analysis of PLC{delta}1 in primary ESCCs and their paired nontumorous tissues.

 
We next investigated the methylation frequency of PLC{delta}1 promoter in 50 primary ESCC tumors and their paired nontumorous tissues by MSP. Methylation of PLC{delta}1 was detected in 19 of 50 (38%) of the primary ESCCs (Fig. 2C). In contrast, methylation was only found in 3 of 50 (6%) of the paired nontumorous tissues.

Inactivation of both alleles of PLC{delta}1 in ESCC. According to two-hit inactivation theory (18), functional loss of both alleles is necessary for the inactivation of TSG. ESCC cell line KYSE30 (tetraploid in chromosome number) was used to test whether the absent expression of PLC{delta}1 was caused by the inactivation of both alleles. The DNA copy number of PLC{delta}1 gene was studied by FISH with a BAC clone containing PLC{delta}1 gene. The result showed that loss of two copies of PLC{delta}1 gene was observed in KYSE30 cells (Fig. 3A ). The remaining two alleles of PLC{delta}1 in KYSE30 cells were completely methylated (Fig. 3B). To further show that the remaining two alleles of PLC{delta}1 were inactivated by methylation, KYSE30 cells were treated with the demethylating agent 5-aza-dC. After treatment, expression of PLC{delta}1 was restored, with concomitant demethylation of its promoter (Fig. 3C). These findings indicated that deletion of one allele and hypermethylation of the other allele may play a synergetic role in the silencing of the PLC{delta}1 gene.


Figure 3
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3. Inactivation of PLC{delta}1 caused by LOH and methylation in ESCC. A, DNA copy loss was observed in a tetraploid ESCC cell line KYSE30 by FISH analysis. Red signal, BAC probe containing PLC{delta}1 gene; green signal, centromere of chromosome 3. B, the remaining two copies of PLC{delta}1 in KYSE30 cells showed complete methylation. NE1 served as unmethylated control. C, restoration of PLC{delta}1 mRNA expression was observed in KYSE30 cells after 5-aza-dC (Aza) treatment (top). +, 5-aza-dC treated; –, untreated. Increased unmethylated alleles were also detected by MSP analysis after 5-aza-dC treatment (bottom). D, pattern of PLC{delta}1 expression, methylation, and LOH in 50 primary ESCC cases. Red, ESCC case with PLC{delta}1 expression; green, ESCC case with absent PLC{delta}1 expression.

 
We then investigated the correlation of down-regulation of PLC{delta}1 with its allelic loss and hypermethylation in 50 primary ESCCs. LOH and hypermethylation were detected in 21 and 19 cases, respectively. In 26 ESCCs with absent expression of PLC{delta}1, inactivation of PLC{delta}1 in 22 (84.6%) cases was correlated with either LOH (n = 5) or methylation (n = 7) only, or both LOH and methylation (n = 10, Fig. 3D). Statistical analysis showed that down-regulation of PLC{delta}1 was significantly associated with LOH and methylation of PLC{delta}1 (P < 0.05, Fisher's exact test).

Tumor-suppressive ability of PLC{delta}1. To determine if PLC{delta}1 has tumor-suppressive ability, two stably PLC{delta}1-expressing clones (PLC{delta}1-c6 and PLC{delta}1-c7) were selected from PLC{delta}1-transfected KYSE30 cells. PLC{delta}1 gene and protein expression in PLC{delta}1-c6 and PLC{delta}1-c7 were confirmed by RT-PCR and Western blot analysis (Fig. 4A ). Tumor-suppressive function of PLC{delta}1 was assessed by foci formation assay, soft agar assay, cell growth assay, and tumor xenograft experiment. Foci formation assay showed that the efficiency of foci formation was significantly inhibited (P < 0.001) in PLC{delta}1-c6 and PLC{delta}1-c7 cells compared with Vec-30 cells (Fig. 4B). A similar result was obtained from soft agar assay, in which the colony formation in soft agar was significantly reduced in PLC{delta}1-c6 and PLC{delta}1-c7 cells compared with Vec-30 cells (P < 0.001; Fig. 4C). Cell growth assay also revealed that the cell growth rates in PLC{delta}1-c6 and PLC{delta}1-c7 cells were significantly inhibited by PLC{delta}1 (P < 0.001) compared with Vec-30 cells (Fig. 4D, left).


Figure 4
View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4. Tumor-suppressive function of PLC{delta}1 in ESCC cells. A, expression of PLC{delta}1 in PLC{delta}1-transfected KYSE30 cells was confirmed by RT-PCR (left) and Western blot analysis (right). c6 and c7 are two independent PLC{delta}1-expressing clones. Vec-30, empty vector–transfected KYSE30 cells. B, representative inhibition of foci formation in monolayer culture by PLC{delta}1. Left, quantitative analyses of foci numbers. Columns, mean of at least three independent experiments; bars, SD. **, P < 0.001 versus Vec-30 by using the Student's t test. C, inhibition of colony formation by PLC{delta}1 in soft agar culture. Left, percentage of colonies formed. Columns, mean of at least three independent experiments; bars, SD. **, P < 0.001. D, growth curves of PLC{delta}1-expressing cells were compared with Vec-30 cells by MTT assay (left). Points, mean of at least three independent experiments; bars, SD. **, P < 0.001. Tumor growth curves of PLC{delta}1-expressing cells in nude mice were compared with Vec-30 cells by tumor xenograft experiment (right). The average tumor volume of PLC{delta}1-expressing cells versus Vec-30 cells was expressed in 20 inoculated sites for each group of cells. Points, mean; bars, SD. **, P < 0.001.

 
To further explore the in vivo tumor-suppressive ability of PLC{delta}1, tumor formation in nude mouse was tested by injection of PLC{delta}1-c6 cells (n = 10) or PLC{delta}1-c7 cells (n = 10), whereas Vec-30 cells were used as controls. Within 4 weeks, solid tumors were readily visible in left hind legs of all 20 mice (injected with Vec-30 cells), but only observed in 4 of 10 and 5 of 10 mice injected with PLC{delta}1-c6 and PLC{delta}1-c7 cells, respectively. In addition, the size of tumors caused by PLC{delta}1-expressing cells (tumor volume, 50 ± 30 mm3) was significantly smaller than tumors (840 ± 200 mm3) induced by Vec-30 cells (P < 0.001; Fig. 4D, right). These results showed that PLC{delta}1 has a strong tumor-suppressive ability both in vitro and in vivo.

Metastasis-suppressing ability of PLC{delta}1. Because our tissue microarray result showed that down-regulation of PLC{delta}1 protein was closely associated with ESCC metastasis, the metastatic role of PLC{delta}1 was studied by cell adhesion and wound-healing assays. The result revealed that exogenous expression of PLC{delta}1 could significantly increase cell adhesion ability in PLC{delta}1-c6 cells (P < 0.05) compared with Vec-30 cells (Fig. 5A ). The wound-healing assay showed that PLC{delta}1 was able to inhibit cell mobility (Fig. 5B).


Figure 5
View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5. PLC{delta}1 inhibits metastasis and induces G1-S cell cycle arrest. A, adhesion assay was used to detect cell adhesion ability in PLC{delta}1-expressing cells and Vec-30 cells in the indicated time period. The A540 values were measured from three independent experiments. **, P < 0.001 versus Vec-30 by using the Student's t test. B, the effect of PLC{delta}1 on cell migration was determined by wound-healing assay. During a period of 24 h, the spreading speed of PLC{delta}1-expressing cells along the wound edge was slower than that in control Vec-30 cells. C, DNA content between PLC{delta}1-expressing cells and control Vec-30 cell were compared by flow cytometry. Untreated, cells were cultured in RPMI medium with 10% FBS. Withdraw serum, cells were cultured in RPMI medium without serum for 3 d. Add serum, cells were cultured again in RPMI medium with 10% FBS for 12 h. D, expression of PLC{delta}1, Akt (total), Akt (Ser473), p21, and cyclin D1 were compared between PLC{delta}1-expressing cells (c6) and control Vec-30 cells by Western blot analysis. Untreated, cells were cultured in RPMI medium with 10% FBS. Add serum, cells were cultured again in RPMI medium with 10% FBS for 12 h after serum starvation.

 
Cell cycle arrest at G1-S-phase by PLC{delta}1. To explore the mechanism underlying growth inhibition by PLC{delta}1, the cell cycle distributions of PLC{delta}1-c6 and Vec-30 cells were determined by flow cytometry. Before treatment, the percentage of cells in S phase was obviously decreased in PLC{delta}1-c6 cells compared with Vec-30 cells (Fig. 5C). After 3 days serum starvation followed by addition of 10% serum for 12 h, the PLC{delta}1-c6 cells showed even more obvious G1-S–phase arrest compared with Vec-30 cells (Fig. 5C).

Up-regulation of p21 and down-regulation of phosphorylated Akt by PLC{delta}1. To investigate the potential molecular mechanism of PLC{delta}1 in cell cycle arrest, we examined the effects of PLC{delta}1 on several key cell cycle regulators, including p21, cyclin D1, and Akt from phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway. Increased expression of p21 and down-regulation of phosphorylated Akt at Ser473 were detected (Fig. 5D). However, no significant difference of cyclin D1 was detected in this study. These results supported that PLC{delta}1 can arrest cell cycle at G1-S checkpoint.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Deletion of 3p is one of the most frequent chromosomal alterations in many malignancies, including ESCC. Several candidate TSGs at 3p have been reported, including FHIT at 3p14.2 (19), RASSF1A (20), CACNA2D2 (21), and DLEC1 at 3p21.3 (22). Although these TSGs have been widely studied, most of the studies were done in lung and renal carcinomas. As for ESCC, deletion of 3p14.2-p21.2 (23, 24) was frequently detected and several candidate TSGs within the region have been studied, including DLEC1, VHL, RAR-ß, RASSF1A, FHIT, and ADAMTS9 (22, 25, 26). In our recent study, we provided the first evidence that the deletion of 3p22 was one of the most frequently deleted regions in ESCC and PLC{delta}1 was identified as a candidate TSG within the deleted region.6

In the present study, we found that mRNA expression of PLC{delta}1 was down-regulated in 44.4% of ESCC cell lines and 52% of primary ESCC tumors. Tissue microarray study showed that absent expression of PLC{delta}1 in protein level was detected in 41.6% primary ESCCs. In addition to the frequent allelic loss at the PLC{delta}1 locus, methylation of CpGs at its promoter region was also frequently observed in primary ESCC tumors with absence of PLC{delta}1 expression (17 of 26, 65.4%), suggesting that promoter hypermethylation plays an important role in the inactivation of PLC{delta}1 during the tumorigenesis of esophageal cancer. In ESCC cell line KYSE30, we clearly showed that the inactivation of PLC{delta}1 gene was caused by the loss of two copies of PLC{delta}1 gene and promoter methylation of the other two copies of PLC{delta}1. Collectively, these results suggested that the promoter methylation and DNA copy loss of PLC{delta}1 gene represent the "first hit" and the "second hit," respectively, in the inactivation of PLC{delta}1 during the ESCC development.

The tumor-suppressive function of PLC{delta}1 has been investigated by both in vitro and in vivo assays in this study. The results showed that PLC{delta}1 could effectively suppress cell growth, decrease foci formation and colony formation in soft agar, and suppress tumor formation in nude mice. Further study revealed that PLC{delta}1 was able to inhibit G1-S phase transition through the activation of p21. A PLC{delta}1-interacting protein, GTPase-activating protein p122 (p122RhoGAP), was isolated from rat and activates the PIP2-hydrolyzing activity of PLC{delta}1 (27). Later, a human homologue of the p122 gene, named deleted in liver cancer 1 (DLC1) gene, was identified as a tumor-suppressor gene (28). The tumor-suppressive role of DLC1 in the development of hepatocellular carcinoma has been widely studied (2931). The tumor-suppressing function of PLC{delta}1 might be associated with DLC1 because the later can stimulate the activity of PLC{delta}1 (27). Interestingly, a recent study suggested that DLC1 could also increase p21 expression in breast cancer cells (32). G1-S phase transition is a major checkpoint for cell cycle progression and p21 is one of the critical negative regulators during this transition (33). This result suggested that PLC{delta}1 could be an important member in DLC1 tumor-suppressing pathway.

Another clue that PLC{delta}1 might collaborate with DLC1 in tumor suppression was that PLC{delta}1 can increase cell adhesion ability. Our tissue microarray results also suggested that the down-regulation of PLC{delta}1 was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis in ESCC. Interestingly, activation of PLC{delta}1 by DLC1 could reduce the amount of PIP2 (27). PIP2 can bind to actin-associated cytoskeletal proteins (e.g., vinculin and talin) and increase the formation of focal adhesion (34). On the basis of these findings, Kawai et al. (35) further showed that p122RhoGAP localized in focal adhesions may inhibit tumor cell migration through the activation of PLC{delta}1. In a more recent report, DLC1 was found to be able to inhibit cell migration in human HCC cells (36).

In this study, we also found that PLC{delta}1 could down-regulate phosphorylated Akt expression, suggesting that the tumor-suppressive function of PLC{delta}1 might be associated with the inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT signal transduction pathway. Previous studies have shown that Akt promotes cell cycle progression directly through inactivation of p21 (37, 38). Our results did show that PLC{delta}1 was able to down-regulate Akt and up-regulate p21, which provides new insight into the mechanism of PLC{delta}1 in cell cycle arrest. In summary, we provided evidences that PLC{delta}1 is a potent tumor-suppressor gene and plays important suppressive role in ESCC development and progression. Further studies will be necessary to elucidate the mechanism of suppressive effect of PLC{delta}1 in human cancers.


    Acknowledgments
 
Grant support: Research Grant Council Central Allocation grant HKUST 2/06C and Sun Yat-Sen University "Hundred Talents Program" grant 85000-3171311.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    Footnotes
 
6 Y. Qin, et al. High-throughput loss of heterozygosity study of chromosome 3p in esophageal cancer using single nucleotide polymorphism markers, submitted for publication. Back

Received 6/27/07. Revised 8/30/07. Accepted 9/24/07.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Parkin DM, Bray FI, Devesa SS. Cancer burden in the year 2000. The global picture. Eur J Cancer 2001;37:S4–66.[Medline]
  2. Ke L. Mortality and incidence trends from esophagus cancer in selected geographic areas of China circa 1970-90. Int J Cancer 2002;102:271–4.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Pack SD, Karkera JD, Zhuang Z, et al. Molecular cytogenetic fingerprinting of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by comparative genomic hybridization reveals a consistent pattern of chromosomal alterations. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1999;25:160–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Yen CC, Chen YJ, Chen JT, et al. Comparative genomic hybridization of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: correlations between chromosomal aberrations and disease progression/prognosis. Cancer 2001;92:2769–77.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Kwong D, Lam A, Guan X, et al. Chromosomal aberrations in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma among Chinese: gain of 12p predicts poor prognosis after surgery. Hum Pathol 2004;35:309–16.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Ogasawara S, Maesawa C, Tamura G, Satodate R. Frequent microsatellite alterations on chromosome 3p in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res 1995;55:891–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Rhee SG, Bae YS. Regulation of phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C isozymes. J Biol Chem 1997;272:15045–8.[Free Full Text]
  8. Kelley GG, Reks SE, Ondrako JM, Smrcka AV. Phospholipase C({epsilon}): a novel Ras effector. EMBO J 2001;20:743–54.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Berridge MJ, Irvine RF. Inositol trisphosphate, a novel second messenger in cellular signal transduction. Nature 1984;312:315–21.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Nishizuka Y. The molecular heterogeneity of protein kinase C and its implications for cellular regulation. Nature 1988;334:661–5.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Rebecchi MJ, Pentyala SN. Structure, function, and control of phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C. Physiol Rev 2000;80:1291–35.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Ryu SH, Kim UH, Wahl MI, et al. Feedback regulation of phospholipase C-ß by protein kinase C. J Biol Chem 1990;265:17941–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Shimada Y, Imamura M, Wagata T, Yamaguchi N, Tobe T. Characterization of 21 newly established esophageal cancer cell lines. Cancer 1992;69:277–84.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Tao Q, Huang H, Geiman TM, et al. Defective de novo methylation of viral and cellular DNA sequences in ICF syndrome cells. Hum Mol Genet 2002;11:2091–102.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Guan XY, Sham JST, Tang TCM, Fang Y, Huo KK, Yang JM. Isolation of a novel candidate oncogene within a frequently amplified region at 3q26 in ovarian cancer. Cancer Res 2001;61:3806–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Xie D, Sham JS, Zeng WF, et al. Heterogeneous expression and association of ß-catenin, p16 and c-myc in multistage colorectal tumorigenesis and progression detected by tissue microarray. Int J Cancer 2003;107:896–902.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Cao ZA, Daniel D, Hanahan D. Sub-lethal radiation enhances anti-tumor immunotherapy in a transgenic mouse model of pancreatic cancer. BMC Cancer 2002;3:2–11.
  18. Knudson AG, Jr. Hereditary cancer, oncogenes, and antioncogenes. Cancer Res 1985;45:1437–43.[Free Full Text]
  19. Ohta M, Inoue H, Cotticelli MG, et al. The FHIT gene, spanning the chromosome 3p14.2 fragile site and renal carcinoma-associated t(3;8) breakpoint, is abnormal in digestive tract cancers. Cell 1996;84:587–97.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Dammann R, Li C, Yoon JH, Chin PL, Bates S, Pfeifer GP. Epigenetic inactivation of a RAS association domain family protein from the lung tumor suppressor locus 3p21.3. Nat Genet 2000;25:315–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Ji L, Nishizaki M, Gao B, et al. Expression of several genes in the human chromosome 3p21.3 homozygous deletion region by an adenovirus vector results in tumor suppressor activities in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Res 2002;62:2715–20.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Daigo Y, Nishiwaki T, Kawasoe T, Tamari M, Tsuchiya E, Nakamura Y. Molecular cloning of a candidate tumor suppressor gene, DLC1, from chromosome 3p21.3. Cancer Res 1999;59:1966–72.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Ko JM, Wong CP, Tang CM, Lau KW, Lung ML. Frequent loss of heterozygosity on multiple chromosomes in Chinese esophageal squamous cell carcinomas. Cancer Lett 2001;170:131–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Shiomi H, Sugihara H, Kamitani S, et al. Cytogenetic heterogeneity and progression of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2003;147:50–61.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Kuroki T, Trapasso F, Yendamuri S, et al. Allele loss and promoter hypermethylation of VHL, RAR-ß, RASSF1A, and FHIT tumor suppressor genes on chromosome 3p in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res 2003;63:3724–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Lo PH, Leung AC, Kwok CY, et al. Identification of a tumor suppressive critical region mapping to 3p14.2 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and studies of a candidate tumor suppressor gene, ADAMTS9. Oncogene 2007;26:148–57.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Homma Y, Emori Y. A dual functional signal mediator showing RhoGAP and phospholipase C-{delta} stimulating activities. EMBO J 1995;14:286–91.[Medline]
  28. Yuan BZ, Miller MJ, Keck CL, Zimonjic DB, Thorgeirsson SS, Popescu NC. Cloning, characterization, and chromosomal localization of a gene frequently deleted in human liver cancer (DLC-1) homologous to rat RhoGAP. Cancer Res 1998;58:2196–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Ng IO, Liang ZD, Cao L, Lee TK. DLC-1 is deleted in primary hepatocellular carcinoma and exerts inhibitory effects on the proliferation of hepatoma cell lines with deleted DLC-1. Cancer Res 2000;60:6581–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Yuan BZ, Durkin ME, Popescu NC. Promoter hypermethylation of DLC-1, a candidate tumor suppressor gene, in several common human cancers. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2003;140:113–7.[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Wong CM, Lee JM, Ching YP, Jin DY, Ng IO. Genetic and epigenetic alterations of DLC-1 gene in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res 2003;63:7646–51.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Ullmannova V, Popescu NC. Inhibition of cell proliferation, induction of apoptosis, reactivation of DLC1, and modulation of other gene expression by dietary flavone in breast cancer cell lines. Cancer Detect Prev 2007;31:110–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Carnero A, Hannon GJ. The INK4 family of CDK inhibitors. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 1998;227:43–55.[Medline]
  34. Sechi AS, Wehland J. The actin cytoskeleton and plasma membrane connection: PtdIns(4,5)P(2) influences cytoskeletal protein activity at the plasma membrane. J Cell Sci 2000;113:3685–95.[Abstract]
  35. Kawai K, Yamaga M, Iwamae Y, et al. A PLC{delta}1-binding protein, p122RhoGAP, is localized in focal adhesions. Biochem Soc Trans 2004;32:1107–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Kim TY, Lee JW, Kim HP, et al. DLC-1, a GTPase-activating protein for Rho, is associated with cell proliferation, morphology, and migration in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2007;355:72–7.[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Rossig L, Jadidi AS, Urbich C, Badorff C, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S. AKT-dependent phosphorelation of p21(Cip1) regulates PCNA binding and proliferation of endothelial cells. Mol Cell Biol 2001;21:5644–57.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Zhou BP, Liao Y, Xia W, Spohn B, Lee MH, Hung MC. Cytoplasmic localization of p21Cip1/WAF1 by Akt-induced phosphorylation in HER-2/neu-overexpressing cells. Nat Cell Biol 2001;3:245–52.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
M. Li, H. Edamatsu, R. Kitazawa, S. Kitazawa, and T. Kataoka
Phospholipase C{varepsilon} promotes intestinal tumorigenesis of ApcMin/+ mice through augmentation of inflammation and angiogenesis
Carcinogenesis, August 1, 2009; 30(8): 1424 - 1432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
Correction: PLC{delta}1 as a Tumor Suppressor in ESCC
Cancer Res., May 1, 2008; 68(9): 3549 - 3549.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Correction (v68,p3549)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fu, L.
Right arrow Articles by Guan, X.-Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fu, L.
Right arrow Articles by Guan, X.-Y.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online