| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Priority Reports |
SignalingOncology Disease Area and Developmental and Molecular Pathways, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Requests for reprints: Leigh Zawel, Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, 250 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139. Phone: 617-871-3455; Fax: 617-871-5783; E-mail: leigh.zawel{at}novartis.com.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(TNF
) signaling pathway as well as X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP) itself. Here, we show that in a subset of highly sensitive tumor cell lines, activity of LBW242 is dependent on TNF
signaling. Mechanistic studies indicate that in this context, XIAP is a positive modulator of TNF
induction whereas cellular inhibitor of apoptosis protein 1 negatively regulates TNF
-mediated apoptosis. [Cancer Res 2007;67(24):11493–8] | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(TNF
), TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), and soluble TRAIL receptor (sTRAIL-R) were from R&D Systems. For rescue experiments, cells were pretreated with 1 µg/mL sTRAIL-R, 1 µg/mL etanercept (Amgen/Wyeth), or 1 µg/mL anti-TNF
antibody (BD PharMingen) 30 min before treatment with LBW242. To evaluate whether degradation of cellular inhibitor of apoptosis protein 1 (cIAP1) was proteosome dependent, cells were pretreated for 2 h with the proteosome inhibitor MG132 (6 µmol/L; Calbiochem). The stable nuclear factor-
B (NF-
B) reporter variant of A549 cells was established with pNF
B-luc (Panomics) and maintained in 100 µg/mL hygromycin B. Luciferase was quantified using the CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Cell Viability Assay (Promega). Cell viability was measured using CellTiter-Glo (Promega). RNA interference reagents. For transient knockdown, small interfering RNAs (siRNA) were obtained from Dharmacon Technologies. Stable knockdown of XIAP in SKOV-3 cells (XIAP-KD) was achieved by retroviral transduction of a shRNA using the pCGll vector (core sequence, 5'-gtcattactttcaagcaaa-3').
RNA interference screen. The apoptosis siRNA library was composed of 318 siRNA Smart pool reagents targeting apoptosis-related genes (Dharmacon) as 6.25 pmol of lyophilized siRNA per well in 96-well plates. Dharmafect2 at 0.28 µL (Dharmacon) diluted in 25-µL DCCR (Dharmacon) was added per well. MKSTYX (Dharmacon) and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Dharmacon) siRNAs were added to additional wells, serving as positive and negative controls, respectively. SKOV-3 cells (6,000 per well) were plated on the siRNA/lipid reagent complexes (6). After 24 h, cells were treated with LBW242 (20 µmol/L) or vehicle for 72 h and cell viability was measured as described above.
Validation of RNA interference screen results. SKOV-3 cells were transfected with original siRNA pools and four individual siRNA duplexes for selected genes, and viability after LBW242 treatment was assessed as above [RelA, green fluorescent protein (GFP), XIAP-1, XIAP-2, XIAP-3, XIAP-4, and XIAP-sp used at 50 nmol/L final concentration; all from Dharmacon]. Knockdown of mRNA was assessed by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR). mRNA was isolated using the RNeasy96 kit (Qiagen), treated with DNase 1, and cDNA was generated using the High Capacity cDNA Archive kit (Applied Biosystems). The cDNA was quantified using custom-designed primers (Sigma Genosys) and Syber Green on an Applied Biosystems 7900HT. Changes in TNF
mRNA following compound treatment were normalized to β-actin and calculated as described (7).
Western blotting. Primary antibodies for immunoblot analyses were anti-cIAP1 (R&D systems), anti-XIAP (BD Biosciences), anti–proliferating cell nuclear antigen (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and anti–β-actin (Sigma).
Cytokine analysis. TNF
protein was measured using a multiplexed sandwich ELISA at Endogen Searchlight services (Pierce).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Consistent with earlier observations, siRNAs targeting caspase-8 but not caspase-9 rescued SKOV-3 cells from LBW242 treatment (Fig. 1D). Knockdown of 35 candidate genes rescued viability as well as, or better than, caspase-8, many by >2 SDs above the plate mean. These candidate genes were subjected to further validation. Hits were considered valid when knockdown of the target mRNA (>70%) by two or more individual siRNAs was concordant with the ability to confer cell viability in the presence of LBW242. Ten genes met this criterion (Supplementary Figs. S2–S4). Unexpectedly, hits included multiple members of the TNF
signaling pathway (TNF
, TNFRI, and RIPK1) and XIAP, the presumed target of LBW242.
To determine whether Smac mimetic cellular activity was linked to TNF
signaling, we investigated whether TNF
expression was induced by LBW242 treatment in either sensitive or insensitive tumor cell lines. SKOV-3, MDA-MB-231, SK-MEL5, HCT116, A549, and C32 represent a range of sensitivities to LBW242 from most to least sensitive (Fig. 2A
). LBW242 treatment induced TNF
mRNA expression 30- and 50-fold above background in SKOV-3 and MDA-MB-231 cells, respectively (Fig. 2B). In contrast, TNF
expression was induced <4-fold in three LBW242 insensitive (IC50, >25 µmol/L) tumor cell lines (HCT116, A549, and C32). SK-MEL5, a cell line with moderate sensitivity (IC50, 1 µmol/L), displayed
10-fold TNF
induction and thus had an intermediate phenotype. TNF
induction was unaffected by the addition of zVAD-fmk (data not shown), suggesting that this event occurred before the onset of caspase activation. No TNF
induction was observed in any cell lines using LCJ787, a structurally related (Supplementary Fig. S1) but non–IAP-binding analogue (data not shown). These data strongly suggest that sensitivity to the Smac mimetic LBW242 is linked to compound-mediated induction of TNF
.
|
is paradoxically able to initiate both survival signaling, via NF-
B, and apoptosis signaling, via caspase-8 (12). To determine whether nascent TNF
protein production was required for initiating apoptosis, SKOV-3 cells were treated with LBW242 in the presence or absence of the TNF
antagonist etanercept. Etanercept inhibited LBW242-induced cell killing in all three sensitive cell lines (Fig. 2C and D, and data not shown). Similar data were obtained using a neutralizing monoclonal antibody recognizing TNF
(Supplementary Fig. S6). This effect was specific for TNF
-neutralizing agents because sTRAIL-R did not affect LBW242 action in any of the sensitive lines tested (Fig. 2C and D). These results indicate that Smac mimetic–induced cell death requires induction of TNF
expression and activation of the extrinsic apoptosis pathway. Although XIAP was thought to be the primary target of Smac mimetics, it was one of the top siRNA rescue hits identified in our screen, a result that was completely unanticipated. To further explore the role of XIAP in mediating sensitivity to Smac mimetics, a cell line was derived from SKOV-3 (XIAP-KD) in which XIAP levels were stably reduced with a shRNA (Fig. 3B, inset ). Consistent with the results from the rescue screen, XIAP-KD cells were resistant to LBW242 (compare Fig. 3A and B).
|
seems to be required for Smac mimetic–induced cell death, we hypothesized that XIAP might be required for TNF
production. To explore this possibility, we measured TNF
protein in SKOV-3 and XIAP-KD cells in the presence and absence of LBW242 (Fig. 3C). Indeed, loss of XIAP not only disrupted LBW242-triggered TNF
induction but also led to decreased basal TNF
levels. XIAP seems to regulate TNF
induction at the transcriptional level because LBW242-mediated induction of TNF
mRNA was ablated in the XIAP-KD cells (Supplementary Fig. S5).
Because TNF
is a known transcriptional target of NF-
B, we next asked whether XIAP was required for transcriptional activation of a NF-
B reporter. A549 cells stably expressing a NF-
B-luciferase reporter were stimulated with TNF
following transfection with siRNAs against RelA, GFP, or XIAP. As expected, knockdown of the NF-
B subunit RelA, but not GFP, significantly diminished TNF
-stimulated reporter activity (Fig. 3D). Like RelA, knockdown of XIAP abrogated NF-
B transcriptional activation (Fig. 3D). Together with recent findings from Lu et al. (13), these data show a requirement for XIAP in modulating certain NF-
B transcriptional programs.
If loss of XIAP expression conferred resistance to LBW242 because XIAP was required for compound-induced TNF
production, one would predict that XIAP-KD cells would be resensitized to LBW242 by the addition of exogenous TNF
. As shown in Fig. 3A and B, respectively, both SKOV-3 and XIAP-KD cells were resistant to exogenous TNF
alone. Addition of exogenous TNF
did not further increase the sensitivity of SKOV-3 cells (Fig. 3A) but dramatically sensitized XIAP-KD cells to LBW242 (Fig. 3B). The dose-dependent TNF
-hypersensitizing effect of LBW242 in cells lacking XIAP argued against the notion that XIAP is the principal target of Smac mimetics and raised the possibility that an alternative protein, which normally represses TNF
-mediated apoptosis, is targeted.
cIAP1 has been reported to negatively regulate TNF
-mediated apoptosis (14–16). Because a peptide derived from Smac was shown to facilitate proteosome-mediated degradation of cIAP1 (17), we asked whether the Smac mimetic LBW242 might behave similarly. Indeed, LBW242 treatment resulted in the disappearance of cIAP1 protein but not XIAP (Fig. 4A
). This effect required binding of LBW242 to the BIR3 domain of cIAP1 because LCJ787, a nonbinding analogue (Supplementary Fig. S1), was inactive in this assay (Fig. 4A). Loss of cIAP1 protein occurred through a proteosome-mediated process because preincubation with MG132 completely inhibited degradation (Fig. 4A). To determine whether cIAP1 loss was requisite for TNF
–mediated cell death in the absence of LBW242, siRNA-mediated knockdowns of cIAP1 or GFP were done in XIAP-KD cells. Knockdown of cIAP1 had almost no effect on the viability of XIAP-KD cells in the absence of TNF
(Fig. 4B). In contrast, loss of cIAP1 in the presence of exogenous TNF
resulted in apoptosis similar to that observed following LBW242 treatment. This TNF
protective role seems to be specific for cIAP1 because knockdown of cIAP2 in the same system did not sensitize to TNF
(data not shown). Because knockdown of cIAP1 expression combined with exogenous TNF
phenocopied LBW242 treatment, we propose that cIAP1 loss is necessary, but not sufficient, for compound action. Together, the aggregate data argue for a model in which Smac mimetics act by eliminating cIAP1, an event that is lethal when accompanied by an XIAP-dependent increase in TNF
production.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
transcription, whereas cIAP1 acts to protect cells from TNF
-mediated apoptosis. Smac mimetic–mediated destruction of cIAP1 renders the cells sensitive to TNF
. Whereas TNF
is clearly a critical driver of Smac mimetic–induced killing, we cannot rule out whether additional cytokines may be involved.
We speculate that the requirement for XIAP in LBW242-mediated killing of SKOV-3 cells stems from the role of XIAP in NF-
B signaling and TNF
induction. Our observation that XIAP was required for activation of a NF-
B reporter as well as for transcription of endogenous TNF
is in agreement with the data of Lu et al. (13), which showed that the XIAP-TAB1 complex positively regulates TAK1 kinase activity. This functionality seems to be conserved evolutionarily because the Drosophila IAP homologue DIAP2 is required for Imd signaling, a TNF
-like pathway that modulates innate immunity (18).
Whereas the role of cIAP1 seems to be analogous to the caspase-8 inhibitor CFLAR, the mechanism through which cIAP1 antagonizes TNF
-mediated apoptosis remains unclear. cIAP1 does not directly inhibit either caspase-3, caspase-7, or caspase-8 (10, 19). cIAP1 has been mapped to the TNF
death-induced signaling complex (DISC) via a direct interaction with TNF receptor–associated factor 2 (20). Other than cIAP1 itself, we have not observed significant changes in the total cellular levels of other DISC components following treatment with LBW242 (data not shown). It remains possible that through the destruction of cIAP1, LBW242 modulates the constellation of proteins recruited to the DISC and consequently affects its function.
Because TNF
induction was not observed when cIAP1 degradation was inhibited by MG132 (data not shown), we suspect that cIAP1 loss is necessary for TNF
induction. This does not seem to be sufficient, however, because cIAP1 elimination, but not TNF induction, occurs in IAP antagonist–resistant cells (data not shown).
In summary, we have identified unanticipated roles for cIAP1 and XIAP in TNF
signaling and unveiled cIAP1 as the primary target of the Smac mimetic class of small molecules in the monotherapy setting. This work suggests that Smac mimetic drugs may have particular benefit in tumors in which TNF
levels are known to be elevated. It is important to note that in chemotherapy-Smac mimetic combination settings, elimination of XIAP BIR3-mediated repression of caspase-9 may provide a TNF
-independent benefit.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Glenn Dranoff for his helpful guidance and Alex Matter and Alexander Kamb for their unwavering support.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received 9/ 7/07. Revised 10/10/07. Accepted 10/18/07.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
B activation via the BIR1/TAB1 interaction and BIR1 dimerization. Mol Cell 2007;26:689–702.[CrossRef][Medline]
-mediated cytotoxicity upstream of caspase-dependent and -independent mitochondrial events in human leukemic cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2001;287:181–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
-induced apoptosis. Cell 2003;115:61–70.[CrossRef][Medline]
B antiapoptosis: induction of TRAF1 and TRAF2 and c-IAP1 and c-IAP2 to suppress caspase-8 activation. Science 1998;281:1680–3.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Borawski, P. Troke, X. Puyang, V. Gibaja, S. Zhao, C. Mickanin, J. Leighton-Davies, C. J. Wilson, V. Myer, I. CornellaTaracido, et al. Class III Phosphatidylinositol 4-Kinase Alpha and Beta Are Novel Host Factor Regulators of Hepatitis C Virus Replication J. Virol., October 1, 2009; 83(19): 10058 - 10074. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. H. Cheung, D. J. Mahoney, E. C. LaCasse, and R. G. Korneluk Down-regulation of c-FLIP Enhances Death of Cancer Cells by Smac Mimetic Compound Cancer Res., October 1, 2009; 69(19): 7729 - 7738. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Csomos, G. F. Brady, and C. S. Duckett Enhanced Cytoprotective Effects of the Inhibitor of Apoptosis Protein Cellular IAP1 through Stabilization with TRAF2 J. Biol. Chem., July 31, 2009; 284(31): 20531 - 20539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Vogler, H. Walczak, D. Stadel, T. L. Haas, F. Genze, M. Jovanovic, U. Bhanot, C. Hasel, P. Moller, J. E. Gschwend, et al. Small Molecule XIAP Inhibitors Enhance TRAIL-Induced Apoptosis and Antitumor Activity in Preclinical Models of Pancreatic Carcinoma Cancer Res., March 15, 2009; 69(6): 2425 - 2434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Ma, W.-W. Cai, L. Zender, T. Dayaram, J. Shen, A. J. Herron, S. W. Lowe, T.-K. Man, C. C. Lau, and L. A. Donehower MMP13, Birc2 (cIAP1), and Birc3 (cIAP2), Amplified on Chromosome 9, Collaborate with p53 Deficiency in Mouse Osteosarcoma Progression Cancer Res., March 15, 2009; 69(6): 2559 - 2567. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Lu, L. Bai, H. Sun, Z. Nikolovska-Coleska, D. McEachern, S. Qiu, R. S. Miller, H. Yi, S. Shangary, Y. Sun, et al. SM-164: A Novel, Bivalent Smac Mimetic That Induces Apoptosis and Tumor Regression by Concurrent Removal of the Blockade of cIAP-1/2 and XIAP Cancer Res., November 15, 2008; 68(22): 9384 - 9393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Ashwell TWEAKing death J. Cell Biol., October 23, 2008; 182(1): 15 - 17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Vince, D. Chau, B. Callus, W. W.-L. Wong, C. J. Hawkins, P. Schneider, M. McKinlay, C. A. Benetatos, S. M. Condon, S. K. Chunduru, et al. TWEAK-FN14 signaling induces lysosomal degradation of a cIAP1-TRAF2 complex to sensitize tumor cells to TNF{alpha} J. Cell Biol., October 23, 2008; 182(1): 171 - 184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Mahoney, H. H. Cheung, R. L. Mrad, S. Plenchette, C. Simard, E. Enwere, V. Arora, T. W. Mak, E. C. Lacasse, J. Waring, et al. Both cIAP1 and cIAP2 regulate TNF{alpha}-mediated NF-{kappa}B activation PNAS, August 19, 2008; 105(33): 11778 - 11783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |