Cancer Research Cancer Research Funding Available  Protein Translation and Cancer
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

Cancer Research 67, 851, February 1, 2007. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3766
© 2007 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ullrich, E.
Right arrow Articles by Zitvogel, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ullrich, E.
Right arrow Articles by Zitvogel, L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Therapeutics and Targets
Right arrow Therapeutics and Targets: Drug Mechanisms and Resistance
Right arrow Cancer Immunology: Adaptive Immunity

Reviews

Therapy-Induced Tumor Immunosurveillance Involves IFN-Producing Killer Dendritic Cells

Evelyn Ullrich1, Mathieu Bonmort1, Grégoire Mignot1, Nathalie Chaput1, Julien Taieb1,3, Cédric Ménard1, Sophie Viaud1, Thomas Tursz1, Guido Kroemer2 and Laurence Zitvogel1

1 Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, U805, Faculté de Médecine Kremlin Bicêtre, and 2 Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unit "Apoptosis, Cancer and Immunity," Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; and 3 Department of Gastroenterology, Hôpital Pitié Salpétrière, AP-HP, Paris, France

Requests for reprints: Laurence Zitvogel, U805 Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale, and CBT507 Center of Clinical Investigations, Institut Gustave Roussy, 39 rue Camille Desmoulins, 94805 Villejuif, France. Phone: 33-1-42-11-50-41; Fax: 33-1-42-11-60-94; E-mail: zitvogel{at}igr.fr.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Key Findings Leading to...
 Phenotype and Morphology of...
 Role of IKDC in...
 Chief Implications
 References
 
A unique class of IFN-producing killer dendritic cells (IKDC) resembling natural killer cells has been defined that can recognize and lyse tumor cells through a tumor necrosis factor–related apoptosis-inducing ligand–dependent mechanism. IKDC may mediate the host-dependent antitumor activity of Gleevec/STI571 and other therapeutics that can inhibit the c-kit tyrosine kinase. IKDC represent an important new component of the innate immune system responding to cancer. [Cancer Res 2007;67(3):851–3]


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Key Findings Leading to...
 Phenotype and Morphology of...
 Role of IKDC in...
 Chief Implications
 References
 
Complete and permanent success of cancer therapy depends on the targeting of all tumor cells (including cancer stem cells) or, alternatively, on the direct removal of a part of the tumor, escorted by a "bystander effect" in which the immune system recognizes, attacks, and eradicates remaining tumor cells. Our group found two examples of such a bystander effect promoted by immune cells. First, anthracycline-treated tumor cells could elicit a dendritic cell (DC)-mediated cytotoxic T cell (CTL) response that conferred stable long-term protection against rechallenge with the same tumor (1). This effect depended on the apoptogenic agent, on the form of cell death, on the innate immune system, as well as on the cognate immune system. Second, inhibition of the c-kit tyrosine kinase by the paradigmatic anticancer drug, Gleevec/STI571, could endow DC with natural killer (NK) cell stimulatory capacity in mice and humans, leading to prolonged survival in patients bearing gastrointestinal sarcoma (2). In attempting to dissect the immune mechanisms leading to drug-induced tumor rejection, we recently discovered a new player in innate immunity that we called "IFN-producing killer dendritic cells" (IKDC), for its ability to produce IFN{gamma} and to recognize tumor cells that are resistant to classic NK cells (3).


    Key Findings Leading to the Discovery of IKDC
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Key Findings Leading to...
 Phenotype and Morphology of...
 Role of IKDC in...
 Chief Implications
 References
 
As recently reported, c-kit tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as Gleevec/STI571 can stimulate a host-dependent antitumor activity involving myeloid DC-primed NK cells (2). With the aim of further improving the NK cell–mediated antitumor effect induced by Gleevec/STI571, we combined Gleevec/STI571 with interleukin 2 (IL-2) and observed enhanced antitumor effects against B16F10 melanoma lung metastases, as compared with either agent alone. Administration of depleting anti-NKR-P1c/NK1.1 monoclonal antibody completely abrogated the tumoricidal activity induced by the combination of Gleevec/STI571 and IL-2, suggesting a role for NK1.1 expressing cells.

Immunohistochemistry of regressing lung metastases in Gleevec/STI571+IL-2–treated mice revealed prominent infiltrates of CD11c+ cells in tumor beds and in surrounding parenchyma, suggesting that DC might be critical effectors of the antitumor effects achieved with the combination therapy (Fig. 1 ). We further did cytofluorometric analyses of single cell suspensions obtained from lung metastases. Classic NK cells defined as CD3B220NK1.1+ cells represented about 4 ± 2% of tumor-infiltrating cells and were not significantly expanded by the combination therapy, whereas the number of CD11c+ cells increased 2- to 3-fold in response to Gleevec/STI571+IL-2. Among those CD11c+ cells, classic plasmacytoid DC (pDC) coexpressing CD11c, B220 and Gr1 molecules represented not more than 3% of tumor-infiltrating CD11c+ cells. Importantly, the majority (72 ± 5%) of tumor-infiltrating CD11c+ cells expressed B220 but lacked Ly6C/Gr1, and all tumor-infiltrating CD11c+ cells that expressed NK1.1 molecules were Gr1 negative. Therefore, we focused our further investigation on the subset of CD11c+ cells coexpressing B220 and NK1.1 molecules.


Figure 1
View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1. The multistep process leading to the discovery of IKDC in mice. Immunotherapy based on the combination of Gleevec/STI571+IL-2 promoted the NK.1.1-dependent tumor growth retardation in the B16F10 tumor model. Immunohistochemistry studies of regressing lung metastases revealed extensive recruitment and/or proliferation of CD11c+ cells. Flow cytometry analyses of lung metastases gating on CD11c+ cells revealed that they coexpressed B220 and NK1.1, but not Gr1, and analyses in blood and spleen showed an increase of this cell population under treatment. Light microscopy (May Grünwald Giemsa) and electron microscopy of IKDC highlighted their small size, the high nucleocytoplasmic ratio, and the abundance of granules in the cytoplasm.

 
The subset of CD11c+B220+NK1.1+Gr1 cells (later called IKDC) increased 4-fold during treatment with Gleevec/STI571+IL-2 (Fig. 1) and coexpressed other NK cell markers such as CD49b/Dx5, CD122, NKG2D, CD11b, and Ly49, but failed to express CD3, CD4, CD8{alpha}, CD25, PDCA-1, and costimulatory molecules. Because up to 50% of the CD11c+B220+NK1.1+/CD49b+ cells coexpressed major histocompatibility complex (MHC) II in tumors, we hypothesized that these CD11c+ cells would belong to the DC lineage.


    Phenotype and Morphology of IKDC
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Key Findings Leading to...
 Phenotype and Morphology of...
 Role of IKDC in...
 Chief Implications
 References
 
In naïve mice, this new distinct cell population, defined as CD11c+B220+NK1.1+/CD49b+ cells, represented about 1% to 2% of all splenic CD11c+ cells and was detected in all lymphoid organs, including blood, liver, gut, lung, and skin (3, 4). We could find those cells in several inbred mouse strains, including in Rag–/–IL-2R{gamma}–/– mice (where they lack NK1.1 molecules but express CD11c, B220, and CD49b), but not in IL-2/IL-15 receptor ß chain–deficient mice (3). The phenotypic and functional characterization of CD11c+B220+NK1.1+/CD49b+ prompted us and our colleagues to call the new cell "IKDC," for reasons explained below.

Analyses using light microscopy and transmission electron microscopy highlighted that freshly isolated IKDC have a unique morphology. IKDC do not resemble pDC (with their developed and pathognomonic endoplasmic reticulum), display a smooth plasma membrane with small pseudopodia, a high nucleocytoplasmic ratio and a dense cytoplasm containing few mitochondria but numerous granules (Fig. 1; refs. 3, 4).


    Role of IKDC in Tumor Immunotherapy
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Key Findings Leading to...
 Phenotype and Morphology of...
 Role of IKDC in...
 Chief Implications
 References
 
Death receptors were found to be involved in the tumoricidal activity promoted by the combination therapy using Gleevec/STI571+IL-2. B16F10 tumor cells manipulated to express proteins that block the proapoptotic signal transduction complex initiated via death receptors (such as the dominant-negative mutant for Fas-associated death domain or the cowpox virus caspase-8 inhibitor CrmA) were resistant to this combination therapy in vivo. However, the combination therapy maintained a significant antitumor activity in TNF–/– mice. Conversely, the efficacy of Gleevec/STI571+IL-2 was completely abolished in mice treated with a neutralizing antimouse tumour necrosis factor–related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) antibody (Ab), establishing the pivotal role of TRAIL in the tumoricidal activity. After the combination therapy with Gleevec/STI571+IL-2, we detected the membrane expression of TRAIL on splenic IKDC and NK cells. Tumor cells transfected with CrmA were not significantly killed by IKDC, underlining the importance of death-receptor signaling for its antitumor activity. Furthermore, our TRAIL-blocking experiments in vitro confirmed that tumor killing was mainly dependent on TRAIL.

Because we found that both IKDC and NK cells could kill in a TRAIL-dependent manner, we investigated whether one of these cell types might be capable to prevent tumor outgrowth in effector-deprived hosts such as B16F10-bearing Rag–/–IL-2R{gamma}–/– mice. When B220+NK1.1+CD49b+ (IKDC) versus B220NK1.1+CD49b+ (NK) cells from Gleevec/STI571+IL-2–treated mice were inoculated into established B16F10 tumors, only IKDC could significantly impair tumor outgrowth. Similar findings were achieved when Dx5+I-Ab+ cells were adoptively transferred into tumor beds (3).

As TRAIL expression is controlled by IFN type II (5), we further examined the regulation of IFN{gamma} secretion by IKDC and NK cells. Strikingly, IKDC stimulated in vitro with tumor cells produced large amounts of IFN{gamma}. Stimulation of IKDC with Gleevec/STI571+IL-2 also resulted in the secretion of IFN{gamma}. Remarkably, IKDC could produce IFN{gamma} in response to a broad array of allogeneic or syngeneic transformed cells except the transporter for antigen processing–deficient RMA-S cells, whereas NK cells failed to do so in the absence of exogenous stimulation, albeit exhibiting lytic activity against RMA-S. It is of note that IKDC did not secrete IFN{gamma} in contact with healthy tissues such as primary hepatocyte or thymocyte cultures.

In conclusion, IKDC might mediate their tumoricidal activity by IFN{gamma} secretion and TRAIL-dependent direct tumor cell lysis.


    Chief Implications
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Key Findings Leading to...
 Phenotype and Morphology of...
 Role of IKDC in...
 Chief Implications
 References
 
This review describes the discovery of a novel DC subset called IKDC, a multitasking chimera sharing the phenotypic and functional properties of both DC and NK cells (3, 4, 6). Indeed, lytic IKDC express MHC class II and CD86 molecules and secrete large amounts of IFN{gamma} in contact with transformed cells (whereas NK cells fail to do so). IKDC display the cardinal feature of DC, i.e., the capacity of antigen presentation following activation with TLR9 ligands as published by Chan et al., who characterized and described IKDC in parallel to our group in BALB/c mouse (4).

These data open up the following prospects:

First, we propose that IKDC constitute a privileged link between the innate and cognate arms of antitumor immunity. The current paradigm for T cell priming following tissue destruction relies on a two-step process whereby the tumor cell death event is somewhat dissociated from the antigen presentation in lymph nodes. Hence, apoptotic tumor cells might release endogenous danger signals that could activate conventional DC (cDC). The CTL or NK attack of tumors could liberate tumor antigens available for cDC and promote the translocation or secretion of endogenous alarmins that could activate surrounding cDC (7). Alternatively, a one-step process could be envisioned in which a single cell would be able to kill tumor targets, uptake apoptotic debris, and initiate its differentiation towards a bona fide antigen-presenting cell. Such a scenario is conceivable because Chan et al. showed that IKDC express L-selectin and CCR7 and can traffic from blood to T cell areas of lymphoid organs, where they exhibit a DC phenotype (losing NKG2D and acquiring CD40; ref. 4). Previous reports alluded to some DC subtypes endowed with cytolytic functions in humans and rodents. In the RIP-LCMV mouse model of virally induced diabetes, Homann et al. identified a subset of "NK/DC," defined as CD11c+CD49b+ cells, capable of preventing autoimmune disease in the setting of anti-CD40L blocking Ab (8). Pillarisetty et al. reported of NK/DC, defined as CD11c+NK1.1+ cells, with simultaneous NK and DC functions (9). However, the precise nature of the cell capable of both, killing and antigen presentation, has not been established before we published our study.
Second, our data suggest that the combination therapy with Gleevec/STI571+IL-2 (which involves IKDC that trigger TRAIL-dependent apoptosis of tumor cells) could be implemented in the clinic, in particular, in TRAIL-sensitive cancers that are resistant to the direct antiproliferative effect of Gleevec/STI571. Consequently, identifying the human counterparts of mouse IKDC remains an important challenge.
Third, the implication of the host immune system in antitumor effects mediated by chemo- or radiotherapy is being actively investigated (10). Certain cell death modalities might electively trigger innate and/or adaptive immune responses, thus eliciting an antitumor response mediated by the host (1, 11). The challenge is now to transpose these data to the human system and to decipher the exact role of IKDC in the immune system's fight against cancer.


    Acknowledgments
 
Grant support: Fellowship from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (E. Ullrich); Poste d'accueil Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale and Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris (J. Taieb and M. Bonmort); ARC (G. Mignot and N. Chaput); European Fellowship QLRT-2001-00093 (N. Chaput); European Union grants ALLOSTEM, DC THERA; and Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer (équipes labelisées by G. Kroemer and L. Zitvogel).

Received 10/11/06. Revised 11/15/06. Accepted 11/22/06.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Key Findings Leading to...
 Phenotype and Morphology of...
 Role of IKDC in...
 Chief Implications
 References
 

  1. Casares N, Pequignot MO, Tesniere A, et al. Caspase-dependent immunogenicity of doxorubicin-induced tumor cell death. J Exp Med 2005;202:1691–701.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Borg C, Terme M, Taieb J, et al. Novel mode of action of c-kit tyrosine kinase inhibitors leading to NK cell-dependent antitumor effects. J Clin Invest 2004;114:379–88.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Taieb J, Chaput N, Menard C, et al. A novel dendritic cell subset involved in tumor immunosurveillance. Nat Med 2006;12:214–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Chan CW, Crafton E, Fan HN, et al. Interferon-producing killer dendritic cells provide a link between innate and adaptive immunity. Nat Med 2006;12:207–13.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Smyth MJ, Cretney E, Takeda K, et al. Tumor necrosis factor–related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) contributes to interferon {gamma}–dependent natural killer cell protection from tumor metastasis. J Exp Med 2001;193:661–70.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Shortman K, Villadangos JA. Is it a DC, is it an NK? No, it's an IKDC. Nat Med 2006;12:167–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Bianchi ME. DAMPs, PAMPs and alarmins: all we need to know about danger. J Leukoc Biol 2007;81:84–91.
  8. Homann D, Jahreis A, Wolfe T, et al. CD40L blockade prevents autoimmune diabetes by induction of bitypic NK/DC regulatory cells. Immunity 2002;16:403–15.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Pillarisetty VG, Katz SC, Bleier JI, Shah AB, Dematteo RP. Natural killer dendritic cells have both antigen presenting and lytic function and in response to CpG produce IFN-{gamma} via autocrine IL-12. J Immunol 2005;174:2612–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Lake RA, Robinson BW. Immunotherapy and chemotherapy—a practical partnership. Nat Rev Cancer 2005;5:397–405.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Obeid M, Tesniere A, Ghiringhelli F, et al. Calreticulin exposure dictates the immunogenicity of cancer cell death. Nat Med 2007;13:54–61.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
N. Himoudi, M. Yan, G. Bouma, D. Morgenstern, R. Wallace, B. Seddon, J. Buddle, A. Eddaoudi, S. J. Howe, N. Cooper, et al.
Migratory and Antigen Presentation Functions of IFN-Producing Killer Dendritic Cells
Cancer Res., August 15, 2009; 69(16): 6598 - 6606.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
K. A. Sauer, J. H. Maxeiner, R. Karwot, P. Scholtes, H. A. Lehr, M. Birkenbach, R. S. Blumberg, and S. Finotto
Immunosurveillance of Lung Melanoma Metastasis in EBI-3-Deficient Mice Mediated by CD8+ T Cells
J. Immunol., November 1, 2008; 181(9): 6148 - 6157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
N. Himoudi, S. Nabarro, J. Buddle, A. Eddaoudi, A. J. Thrasher, and J. Anderson
Bone Marrow-Derived IFN-Producing Killer Dendritic Cells Account for the Tumoricidal Activity of Unpulsed Dendritic Cells
J. Immunol., November 1, 2008; 181(9): 6654 - 6663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
K. S. Hill, F. Errington, L. P. Steele, A. Merrick, R. Morgan, P. J. Selby, N. T. Georgopoulos, D. M. O'Donnell, and A. A. Melcher
OK432-Activated Human Dendritic Cells Kill Tumor Cells via CD40/CD40 Ligand Interactions
J. Immunol., September 1, 2008; 181(5): 3108 - 3115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
S. Mariotti, V. Sargentini, C. Marcantonio, E. Todero, R. Teloni, M. C. Gagliardi, A. R. Ciccaglione, and R. Nisini
T-cell-mediated and antigen-dependent differentiation of human monocyte into different dendritic cell subsets: a feedback control of Th1/Th2 responses
FASEB J, September 1, 2008; 22(9): 3370 - 3379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
E. Ullrich, M. Bonmort, G. Mignot, B. Jacobs, D. Bosisio, S. Sozzani, A. Jalil, F. Louache, E. Bulanova, F. Geissman, et al.
Trans-Presentation of IL-15 Dictates IFN-Producing Killer Dendritic Cells Effector Functions
J. Immunol., June 15, 2008; 180(12): 7887 - 7897.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
G. Mignot, E. Ullrich, M. Bonmort, C. Menard, L. Apetoh, J. Taieb, D. Bosisio, S. Sozzani, M. Ferrantini, J. Schmitz, et al.
The Critical Role of IL-15 in the Antitumor Effects Mediated by the Combination Therapy Imatinib and IL-2
J. Immunol., May 15, 2008; 180(10): 6477 - 6483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
C. A.J. Vosshenrich, S. Lesjean-Pottier, M. Hasan, O. Richard-Le Goff, E. Corcuff, O. Mandelboim, and J. P. Di Santo
CD11cloB220+ interferon-producing killer dendritic cells are activated natural killer cells
J. Exp. Med., October 29, 2007; 204(11): 2569 - 2578.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ullrich, E.
Right arrow Articles by Zitvogel, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ullrich, E.
Right arrow Articles by Zitvogel, L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Therapeutics and Targets
Right arrow Therapeutics and Targets: Drug Mechanisms and Resistance
Right arrow Cancer Immunology: Adaptive Immunity


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online