Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2010 Protein Translation and Cancer
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Cancer Research 67, 881, February 1, 2007. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3767
© 2007 American Association for Cancer Research
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Park, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lin, H. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Park, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lin, H. J.

Molecular Biology, Pathobiology, and Genetics

Hematopoietic Prostaglandin D Synthase Suppresses Intestinal Adenomas in ApcMin/+ Mice

Jae Man Park1, Yoshihide Kanaoka3, Naomi Eguchi4, Kosuke Aritake4, Sava Grujic2, Alicia M. Materi1, Virgilio S. Buslon2, Brigette L. Tippin1, Alan M. Kwong1, Eduardo Salido5, Samuel W. French2, Yoshihiro Urade4 and Henry J. Lin1

1 Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics and 2 Department of Pathology, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute, Harbor-University of California-Los Angeles Medical Center, Torrance, California; 3 Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; 4 Department of Molecular Behavioral Biology, Osaka Bioscience Institute, Osaka, Japan; and 5 Unidad de Investigacion, Hospital Universitario Canarias, Laguna, Tenerife, Spain

Requests for reprints: Henry J. Lin, Division of Medical Genetics, Harbor-University of California-Los Angeles Medical Center, 1124 West Carson Street, Torrance, CA 90502. Phone: 310-222-3783; Fax: 310-328-9921; E-mail: hlin{at}labiomed.org.


   Abstract
Top
 Abstract
Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs prevent some cases of colon cancer by inhibiting prostaglandin (PG) synthesis. PGE2 promotes colon neoplasia, as shown by knockout mouse studies on enzymes and receptors in the PG cascade. A few experiments 20 to 30 years ago suggested that PGD2 may suppress tumors, but a role for biosynthetic enzymes for PGD2 in tumor development has not been studied. We report here that disruption of the gene for hematopoietic PGD synthase in ApcMin/+ mice led to ~50% more intestinal adenomas compared with controls. Tumor size was not affected. By immunohistochemistry, we detected hematopoietic PGD synthase mainly in macrophages and monocytes of the gut mucosa. The mean number of tumors did not increase with knockout of the gene for the lipocalin type of the enzyme, which is not produced in the intestine. On the other hand, ApcMin/+ mice with transgenic human hematopoietic PGD synthase tended to have 80% fewer intestinal adenomas. The transgene produced high mRNA levels (375-fold over endogenous). There was a suggestion of higher urinary excretion of 11ß-PGF2{alpha} and a lower excretion of a PGE2 metabolite in transgenic mice, but differences (30–40%) were not statistically significant. The results support an interpretation that hematopoietic PGD synthase controls an inhibitory effect on intestinal tumors. Further studies will be needed to prove possible mechanisms, such as routing of PG production away from protumorigenic PGE2 or inhibition of the nuclear factor-{kappa}B cascade by PGD2 metabolites. [Cancer Res 2007;67(3):881–9]


   Introduction
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Historically, D series prostaglandins (PG) were viewed as by-products of PGE synthesis (1). When early researchers discovered a PGD synthase, they suspected that it might be part of a pathway for PG removal, instead of an enzyme responsible for a biologically active compound (2). PGD23 is now known as a regulator of sleep, platelet aggregation, inflammation, smooth muscle contraction, and bronchoconstriction.

Two types of PGD synthase are known (3–5). The brain type occurs in the nervous system, epididymis, and heart (6). It resembles lipophilic ligand carrier proteins and is called lipocalin-type PGD synthase (L-PGDS; refs. 7, 8). The enzyme is a monomer with a ß-barrel structure and a hydrophobic pocket (6). Mice lacking L-Pgds do not have the normal pain response (allodynia) after infusion of PGE2 into spinal fluid (9).

Hematopoietic PGD synthase (H-PGDS) was first prepared from rat spleen (10, 11) and later identified in the gut and other organs (12). H-PGDS is a glutathione transferase (sigma type), based on its amino acid sequence and use of glutathione as a cofactor (13, 14). The enzyme is a homodimer and folds like other glutathione transferases (15).

PGD2 levels in malignant melanoma cell lines first suggested a role for PGD2 in cancer. Melanoma cells with less PGD2 caused more metastatic foci in the lung when injected into mice (16). PGD2 and derivatives also inhibited growth of leukemic cells in culture and Ehrlich ascites tumors (17–19). These results support a hypothesis that D series PGs or metabolites may be tumor inhibitors.

The ApcMin/+ mouse strain was originally produced by ethylnitrosourea, which caused a nonsense mutation at codon 850 (out of 2,845) in the adenomatous polyposis coli (Apc) gene (20). Heterozygous mice (ApcMin/+) develop many adenomas in the intestines, from the duodenum to the colon (multiple intestinal neoplasia), resembling familial adenomatous polyposis in humans. Here, we bred ApcMin/+ mice with H-Pgds knockout or H-PGDS transgenic mice to assess the hypothesis that PGD2 production may influence development of intestinal adenomas. ApcMin/+ mice deficient in the H-Pgds enzyme developed 50% more intestinal adenomas, whereas mice with high expression of H-PGDS had ~80% fewer.


   Materials and Methods
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mouse strains. C57BL/6J, FVB/NJ, and ApcMin/+ (stock no. 002020) mice came from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). L-Pgds knockout mice were produced as described (9). Production of H-Pgds knockout and H-PGDS transgenic mice at Osaka Bioscience Institute (Osaka, Japan) and the Japan Tobacco, Inc. Pharmaceutical Frontier Research Laboratories (Osaka, Japan) is described below. Animals were fed Purina lab rodent diet (LabDiet 5001, PMI Nutrition International, Richmond, IN) ad libitum. All procedures were approved by the institutional Animal Care and Use Review Committee.

H-Pgds knockout mice. The targeting vector for homologous recombination contained a neomycin resistance gene (neo) placed between an 8.9-kb XhoI-Eco47III fragment and a 2.0-kb BstXI-BamHI fragment from the mouse H-Pgds gene (Fig. 1A ; ref. 21). We joined the herpes simplex virus (HSV) thymidine kinase gene directly 5' of the 8.9-kb XhoI-Eco47III fragment. The neo gene was driven by the HSV thymidine kinase promoter (from plasmid pMC1neo) and placed in the sense direction with respect to H-Pgds. The neo cassette disrupted exon 2 of the mouse H-Pgds gene.


Figure 1
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Figure 1. Production and characterization of PGD synthase knockout mice. A, structure of the WT (H-Pgds+) allele (top), the targeting vector (middle), and the targeted allele (bottom). Thick bar, probe used for Southern blotting. Restriction enzyme sites were as follows: N, NcoI; E, Eco47III; and B, BstXI. TK, HSV thymidine kinase gene; neo, neomycin resistance gene. Arrows, PCR primers used for genotyping. B, Southern blot analysis of NcoI-digested tail DNA (10 µg/lane) from H-Pgds+/+, H-Pgds+/–, and H-Pgds–/– mice, by the use of the 32P-labeled probe shown in (A). C, genotyping by PCR, showing H-Pgds+/+, H-Pgds+/–, and H-Pgds–/– mice. D, Western blot analysis of proteins extracted from bone marrow mast cells of H-Pgds+/+ and H-Pgds–/– mice. There was a single, 26-kDa protein band with H-Pgds+/+ mice. No band was seen with H-Pgds–/– mice.

 
We transfected the linearized targeting vector into 129/Sv embryonic stem (ES) cells and selected for resistant clones with G418 (200 µg/mL; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and gancyclovir (2 µmol/L; Sigma, St. Louis, MO). Verification of homologous recombination was by Southern blotting of genomic DNA from resistant colonies. We microinjected recombinant ES clones into C57BL/6 blastocysts and transferred the blastocysts to pseudopregnant ICR females to generate chimeras. We bred male mice that were >50% chimeric with C57BL/6 females and genotyped offspring by Southern blotting (Fig. 1B) and PCR (Fig. 1C). Intercrossing heterozygotes yielded homozygous H-Pgds–/– mice.

We crossed ApcMin/+ males with heterozygous H-Pgds+/– females to produce ApcMin/+H-Pgds+/– offspring. We bred ApcMin/+H-Pgds+/– males with H-Pgds+/– or H-Pgds–/– females to produce ApcMin/+H-Pgds–/– mice. ApcMin/+ littermates served as controls (C57BL/6 background). We produced ApcMin/+ L-Pgds–/– mice by the same strategy.

H-PGDS transgenic mice. We inserted a 600-bp human H-PGDS coding cDNA fragment into vector pCAGGS, joining it to a chicken ß-actin promoter, the rabbit ß-globin polyadenylation signal, and the cytomegalovirus immediate early enhancer (22). We then excised the gene construct from the vector by the use of restriction enzymes SalI and NotI and microinjected the 3.1-kb fragment into pronuclei of fertilized FVB/N mouse eggs. Microinjection was done at DNX (Princeton, NJ). We identified transgenic mice by Southern blotting with a human H-PGDS gene probe.

We bred male H-PGDS transgenic mice (strain FVB/N; line S-55) with C57BL/6 females to produce transgenic mice on a mixed C57BL/6 x FVB/N background. Similarly, we bred C57BL/6 ApcMin/+ males with FVB/N females to produce mixed ApcMin/+ mice. We then intercrossed the progeny to produce ApcMin/+ mice with transgenic H-PGDS (and control ApcMin/+ mice) on a mixed background.

Genotyping. We genotyped mice by the use of PCR (Supplementary Table S1). DNA templates were 1-mm punches of dried blood on blotter paper (no. 903; Whatman Schleicher and Schuell, Florham Park, NJ). We collected drops of blood from tail segments at 10 days and when mice were sacrificed. We genotyped both blood specimens. For H-PGDS transgenic mice with ApcMin/+, we also used DNA from 10-µm sections of the paraffin blocks containing coiled intestines. Each PCR was in a total volume of 15 µL. Detection of PCR products was on agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide.

mRNA isolation and reverse transcription-PCR. We isolated total RNA from ~100 mg colon tissue (RNeasy Lipid Tissue Mini kit, Qiagen, Germantown, MD). We did two-step quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) in triplicate for each sample, by the use of an ABI Prism 7000 Sequence Detector and Taqman Gold RT-PCR reagents (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Oligonucleotide primers and probes (designed by the use of Primer Express software, Applied Biosystems) spanned introns to prevent any amplification of genomic DNA (Supplementary Table S1). Fluorogenic probe sequences were as follows: 6FAMCTGGGAAGACAGCGTTGGAGCAATGTAMRA (mouse H-Pgds) and 6FAMCCAAGGCTGGTGACTTTACGGAAGAAAGTTAMRA (human H-PGDS). We amplified endogenous mouse glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase as a reference in all experiments (Assays-on-Demand, Applied Biosystems). We estimated copy numbers of mouse H-Pgds or transgenic human H-PGDS transcripts by the use of two standard curves plotted by amplifying a plasmid carrying the human cDNA sequence or a PCR product encoding the mouse cDNA.

Conditions for reverse transcription (step 1) were as follows: 25°C for 10 min, 48°C for 30 min, and 95°C for 5 min, with a reaction containing ~200 ng total RNA, 1x Taqman RT buffer, 5.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 500 µmol/L of each deoxynucleotide triphosphate, 2.5 µmol/L random hexamers, 4 units RNase inhibitor, and 12.5 units MultiScribe reverse transcriptase (Applied Biosystems). PCR conditions for step 2 were as follows: 95°C for 10 min followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 sec and 60°C for 1 min, with a reaction containing 10 µL of the product from step 1, 1x Taqman buffer, 5.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 200 µmol/L each of dATP, dGTP, and dCTP, 400 µmol/L dUTP, 100 nmol/L of the fluorogenic probe, 200 nmol/L of each forward and reverse primer, and 1 unit AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase.

Urine PGs. We housed mice individually in metabolic cages to obtain urine. We collected urine during the day and overnight for a 24-h period, spun the sample to pellet the debris, and froze specimens at –80°C until ready for assay. Determinations of 11ß-PGF2{alpha} and 9,15-dioxo-11{alpha}-hydroxy-2,3,4,5-tetranor-prostan-1,20-dioic acid (PGE-M) were by enzyme immunoassay (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI). The Harbor-University of California-Los Angeles General Clinical Research Center core laboratory measured urine creatinine, by the use of the Jaffe alkaline picrate reaction in an autoanalyzer. We transformed data (in picograms of PG per milligram of creatinine) to their logarithms (base 10) and assessed differences by mixed model ANOVA to account for multiple and varying numbers of urine samples per mouse.

Intestinal histopathology. We sacrificed mice at 14 weeks, immediately removed the intestine in one piece, and placed it in a glass dish with Ringer solution. We flushed the interior of the intestine with Ringer solution through an 18-gauge needle, then flattened the intestine on Whatman 3MM paper, opened it lengthwise, and fixed it in buffered formalin for 2 to 4 h. We coiled the fixed intestine like a Swiss roll (inside out) around a wooden stick, removed the stick, and placed the coil in an embedding cassette. Specimens were embedded in paraffin, sectioned (4-µm thickness), mounted on slides (Snowcoat X-tra, Surgipath, Richmond, IL), and stained with H&E. We examined sections by the use of a Leica MZ6 stereo microscope (up to x40 magnification, Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) to identify and count adenomas. We used higher magnification (x100–x400) if needed to confirm. We measured adenomas by the use of an eyepiece graticule on the Leica MZ6 microscope. All slides were examined without knowledge of genotypes.

For H-Pgds and L-Pgds knockout mice, we examined 18 sections spaced 240 to 260 µm apart. For H-PGDS transgenic mice, we examined 24 sections spaced ~150 µm apart. We prepared more sections than we did for knockout mice, in case there were substantially fewer adenomas due to the transgene or to the mixed genetic background of the mice (23). Use of sections spaced 150 µm apart allows detection of most small adenomas (see Results for the size range). Numbers of adenomas in our transgenic mice are not directly comparable with numbers in the knockout mice due to these differences in methods.

We used a color-coding procedure to avoid counting adenomas more than once. Each slide had two sections, mounted left to right in the order of cutting, and we examined 9 or 12 consecutive slides. We first marked all adenoma profiles with a red ink dot. We then examined each slide again to compare the left section with the right section. Profiles were marked with a black dot, if the same adenoma was represented on both the left and the right section of the same slide. We then examined all slides a third time to compare adenoma profiles in the right section of each slide with the left section of the next consecutive slide. Profiles were marked with a blue dot, if the adenoma was represented on both the right section of a slide and the left section of the next consecutive slide. Thus, we marked all adenoma profiles with either one red dot, two dots (either red/black or red/blue), or three dots (red/black/blue). We counted only the "red" and "red/black" adenoma profiles on the right section of each slide and the "red" and "red/blue" adenoma profiles on the left section of each slide.

We randomly chose 10% of the intestines for recounting after we examined slides from all 85 mice, again without knowledge of genotypes. Average deviations in counts were 1.4 adenomas for the entire intestine. We also chose slides at random for independent rereview (by S.W.F. and S.G.).

Statistical analyses of adenoma data. We transformed numbers of adenomas to their logarithms (base 10) to approximate a normal distribution. We used ANOVA with Dunnett's method to compare controls with each of the three groups of knockout mice with different genotypes. We used t tests to assess adenomas in H-PGDS transgenic mice versus controls. We also applied nonparametric methods to untransformed data for these comparisons (Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests, respectively).

Immunohistochemistry. For H-Pgds staining, we treated deparaffinized sections with 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 9.5, 45 min, 80°C) for unmasking followed by 0.3% H2O2 in methanol to inhibit endogenous peroxidases (15 min, room temperature) and 20% normal goat serum in PBS for blocking (30 min, room temperature). Next, we treated sections with 0.1% Triton X-100 (10 min, room temperature). Then, for staining, we used either a rat anti-mouse H-Pgds monoclonal antibody (1:100 dilution) or a rabbit anti-mouse H-Pgds polyclonal antibody (1:200 dilution) in PBS (overnight; both antibodies were from Cayman Chemical). Signal detection was with biotinylated antirat or antirabbit IgG, respectively (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) followed by avidin-biotin-peroxidase complexes and diaminobenzidine as the chromogen. The avidin-biotin-peroxidase reaction was in 0.35 mol/L NaCl to prevent nonspecific avidin binding to mast cells (24).

For macrophage-specific staining, we preincubated deparaffinized and hydrated sections (10-µm thick) with 0.3% H2O2 in methanol followed by PBS with 0.01% Triton X-100. After pretreatment with pepsin for 15 min, we sequentially incubated the sections with Iba-1 antibody, an appropriate biotinylated secondary antibody (rabbit IgG), and avidin-biotin complexes, according to the manufacturer's protocol (Vector Laboratories). We visualized immunoreactivity with 0.03% H2O2 in 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.6) with 0.05% diaminobenzidine.

Western blot analysis. We harvested bone marrow cells from H-Pgds+/+ and H-Pgds–/– mice and cultured them for 4 weeks in the presence of interleukin (IL)-3. More than 95% of the nonadherent cells were mast cells (by toluidine blue staining). We used SDS-PAGE to separate proteins from 1 x 105 bone marrow–derived mast cells and blotted them onto a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane. We incubated the blot with rabbit anti-mouse H-Pgds antiserum (1:1,000 dilution) and then with horseradish peroxidase–conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG. After incubation with SuperSignal substrate (Pierce Biotechnology, Inc., Rockford, IL), we visualized immunoreactive proteins with Kodak BioMax film (Molecular Imaging Systems, Eastman Kodak Co., New Haven, CT).


   Results
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
Discussion
 References
 
Characterization of H-Pgds knockout mice. Mouse and human H-Pgds genes have six exons, which encode 199 amino acids (21). To produce mice deficient in H-Pgds, we made a targeting vector that disrupted exon 2, which encodes 44 residues, including the NH2-terminal methionine and two amino acids important for enzyme function (Tyr8 and Arg14; Fig. 1A; ref. 25). We made clones of mutated ES cells (strain 129/Sv) and used them to generate chimeric mice. Chimeric males bred with C57BL/6 females produced heterozygous F1 mice on a mixed background, which we then backcrossed with C57BL/6 mice through 15 generations.

Intercrosses (H-Pgds+/– x H-Pgds+/–, including some with ApcMin/+) yielded offspring in expected 1:2:1 ratios: 27.8% H-Pgds–/– (22 of 79 mice), 45.6% H-Pgds+/– (36 of 79), and 26.6% H-Pgds+/+ (21 of 79; {chi}2 = 0.65; P = 0.72). Thus, there was no sign of embryonic lethality. H-Pgds null mice developed normally. Average weights at 10 weeks indicated no difference in growth between H-Pgds–/– (21.7 g for six mice) and wild-type (WT) mice. H-Pgds–/– mice produced no H-Pgds or truncated products detectable by Western blotting of proteins from bone marrow–derived mast cells (Fig. 1D).

High H-PGDS expression in transgenic mice. To generate mice that overproduce H-PGDS, we used a human H-PGDS coding sequence controlled by a chicken ß-actin promoter, the rabbit ß-globin polyadenylation signal, and the cytomegalovirus immediate early enhancer (22). We microinjected the gene into pronuclei of fertilized FVB/N mouse eggs and identified transgenic founders by Southern blotting. We did not determine copy number or insertion sites. Mice from transgenic lines appeared healthy, had normal growth, and produced offspring. H-PGDS transgenic mice and controls used in experiments below were of a mixed background (C57BL/6 x FVB/N; see Materials and Methods).

Transgenic mice had high expression of human H-PGDS in colon tissue, as shown by reverse transcription and quantitative PCR. We found 998 to 6,090 copies of mouse H-Pgds transcripts per nanogram of total RNA in four mice (geometric mean, 2.0 x 103 copies). In contrast, we found 5.97 x 105 and 9.45 x 105 copies of human H-PGDS transcripts per nanogram of total RNA in two transgenic mice (geometric mean, 7.5 x 105 copies). The mean copy numbers correspond to a 375-fold increase in expression of transgenic H-PGDS over endogenous mouse H-Pgds.

Urinary 11ß-PGF2{alpha} and PGE-M in H-PGDS transgenic mice. PGD2 degrades rapidly in vivo and is removed from the circulation. 11ß-PGF2{alpha} is the first metabolite that appears in the urine and is an indicator of PGD2 produced in the body (26). Similarly, PGE2 is quickly catabolized in the lungs, and urinary PGE-M reflects tissue PGE2 production (27). Excretion of 11ß-PGF2{alpha} varied from 140 to 1,700 pg/mg creatinine for mice with WT H-Pgds genes (geometric mean, 460). Urinary PGE-M varied from 390 to 12,400 pg/mg creatinine for WT controls (geometric mean, 2,520). Compared with controls, H-PGDS transgenic mice had somewhat higher 11ß-PGF2{alpha} excretion [geometric mean, 630; 1.4-fold higher; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.94–2.0; P = 0.09] and lower PGE-M excretion (geometric mean, 1,613; 0.64-fold lower; 95% CI, 0.32–1.26; P = 0.19), but differences were not statistically significant (Fig. 2 ).


Figure 2
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Figure 2. Urine PG excretion in WT and H-PGDS transgenic mice. A, urine 11ß-PGF2{alpha} in WT and H-PGDS transgenic mice. Representative of 84 urine collections from 37 mice (one to nine urine collections per mouse). Three points show results of a single measurement, whereas all others represent the average of at least two measurements at different dilutions of urine. Only two mice were ApcMin/+ carriers, and both had WT PGD synthase genes [log10 (11ß-PGF2{alpha}) = 2.56 and 2.50]. The difference in geometric means between WT and H-PGDS transgenic mice was not statistically significant (one-way mixed model ANOVA for these two groups; P = 0.09, two tailed). Horizontal bars, means of the points plotted, which are slightly different from geometric means found by the mixed model calculation (see Results). B, urine PGE-M in WT and H-PGDS transgenic mice. Representative of 82 urine collections from 34 mice. Two points show results of a single measurement, whereas all others represent the average of at least two determinations at different urine dilutions. There were no ApcMin/+ carriers among these mice. The difference in geometric means between WT and H-PGDS transgenic mice was not statistically significant (one-way mixed model ANOVA for these two groups; P = 0.19, two tailed). Horizontal bars, means of the points plotted, which are slightly different from geometric means found by the mixed model calculation (see Results).

 
Increased numbers of intestinal adenomas in ApcMin/+ mice with H-Pgds gene knockouts. We sacrificed mice at 14 weeks to count adenomas histologically. We prepared the entire intestine like a Swiss roll, embedded it in paraffin, and made slides for microscopic analysis. We identified tumors in 18 sections spaced 240 to 260 µm apart. By this method, we sampled nearly the entire intestine, using the entire paraffin block except for the partial sections at the beginning and end of each block (see Materials and Methods).

ApcMin/+ mice that were homozygous or heterozygous for the H-Pgds deletion had 44% to 61% more intestinal adenomas than did ApcMin/+ mice with WT H-Pgds (Fig. 3A ; Table 1 ). More than 95% of the adenomas were in the small bowel. Colon adenomas increased 2-fold (Fig. 3B). There was no statistical difference between numbers of adenomas in H-Pgds–/– versus H-Pgds+/– mice. Numbers of adenomas in ApcMin/+ mice homozygous for L-Pgds deletions were not different from controls.


Figure 3
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Figure 3. Observed numbers of adenomas in ApcMin/+ mice, with H-Pgds knockout mutations or transgenic H-PGDS, and controls (WT). Plotted points, logarithms of the numbers of adenomas. Horizontal bars, mean. *, P < 0.05, statistically significant difference between the indicated genotype and controls; NS, nonsignificant difference. A, adenomas in the entire intestine of Pgds knockout mice and controls. H-Pgds–/–, homozygous H-Pgds knockout mice; H-Pgds+/–, heterozygous H-Pgds knockout mice; L-Pgds–/–, homozygous L-Pgds knockout mice; WT, control mice (ApcMin/+). B, colon adenomas in Pgds knockout mice and controls. Labeling is the same as in Fig. 2A above. C, adenomas in the entire intestine (left) and in the colon (right) of H-PGDS transgenic mice and controls. TG, H-PGDS transgenic mice; WT, control mice (ApcMin/+). We added 0.5 to all numbers of colon adenomas before taking the logarithm because three transgenic mice had zero colon adenomas.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		Table 1. Adenomas in ApcMin/+ mice with PGD synthase knockouts or transgenes

 
We measured sizes of 1,776 adenomas of the small bowel in a total of nine ApcMin/+ mice (three mice each with H-Pgds–/–, H-Pgds+/–, and H-Pgds+/+ genotypes; Fig. 4 ; Table 1). We used mice whose numbers of adenomas were very close to the median number for their genotype. Sizes ranged from 0.1 to 2.5 mm, as measured under the microscope. The smallest adenomas were microscopic foci of dysplastic cells. Adenomas in mice with H-Pgds knockouts tended to be smaller than adenomas in controls. For example, average sizes for H-Pgds+/–and H-Pgds–/– mice were 0.49 to 0.51 mm compared with 0.68 mm for H-Pgds+/+ mice. However, differences were not assessed statistically.


Figure 4
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Figure 4. Size distribution of adenomas among mice with different H-Pgds genotypes. A, small bowel adenomas in three H-Pgds–/– mice. B, small bowel adenomas in three H-Pgds+/– mice. C, small bowel adenomas in three H-Pgds+/+ mice.

 
We measured sizes of 596 colon adenomas in a total of 73 mice (data not shown). We excluded mice with L-Pgds knockouts. Adenoma sizes ranged from 0.1 to 4.6 mm. Most were <1 mm. There appeared to be no difference in sizes of colon adenomas across H-Pgds genotypes, judging from the variation seen.

Reduced numbers of intestinal adenomas in ApcMin/+ mice with transgenic human H-PGDS. We prepared slides as described above, except we examined 24 sections spaced 150 µm apart. We used more sections for transgenic mice than for knockout mice, anticipating potentially fewer adenomas due to the transgene or to the hybrid genetic background of the mice (C57BL/6 x FVB/N). For example, ApcMin/+ mice on a hybrid C57BL/6 x AKR background had ~80% fewer tumors than did C57BL/6 ApcMin/+ mice (23). Use of sections spaced 150 µm apart allows detection of a higher proportion of small adenomas (~100 µm in diameter) in the sectioned region. Therefore, results for H-PGDS transgenic and H-Pgds knockout mice are not directly comparable. ApcMin/+ mice with H-PGDS transgenes had 70% to 80% fewer adenomas than did controls, in both the small bowel and the colon (Fig. 3C; Table 1). The size range of adenomas in H-PGDS transgenic mice was similar to ranges for H-Pgds knockout mice and controls.

H-Pgds in macrophages of the intestinal mucosa. We used immunohistochemistry to detect H-Pgds in the intestinal mucosa. We did avidin-biotin-peroxidase reactions in 0.35 mol/L NaCl (24) to prevent nonspecific staining of mast cells. Intestines from mice with homozygous H-Pgds gene knockouts did not stain with anti–H-Pgds antibodies under these conditions (Fig. 5A ).


Figure 5
View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
  		Figure 5. Histology and immunoperoxidase staining of intestines from H-Pgds–/– and H-Pgds+/+ mice. Staining with antimouse H-Pgds antibodies (brown) appears in macrophages, monocytes, and a few mast cells. A, section through villi from a H-Pgds–/– mouse, with no antibody staining detectable. Bar, 50 µm. B, section through villi from H-Pgds+/+ mice, with staining in the mucosal stroma. Bar, 50 µm. C, immunoperoxidase staining of the intestine from a H-Pgds+/+ mouse with macrophage-specific antibodies (Iba-1). Macrophage staining appears in stromal cells of the intestinal mucosa as in (B). Bar, 50 µm. D, high magnification view of H-Pgds–positive cells in the intestinal mucosa. The peroxidase-stained cells (brown) are rounded or oval in shape. Nuclei are kidney-shaped with small nucleoli, characteristic of macrophages. Bar = 5 µm.

 
We detected H-Pgds in macrophages and monocytes in the intestinal mucosa of WT mice (Fig. 5B and D). H-Pgds–positive cells occurred in the same stromal distribution as did macrophages stained with Iba-1 antibodies (Fig. 5C). Mast cells also stained for H-Pgds, but there were only a few mast cells in our sections (data not shown). Peyer's patches showed scattered H-Pgds–positive cells rather than uniform staining (data not shown), supporting an interpretation that the stained cells were not lymphocytes. No H-Pgds was detected in fibroblasts, endothelial cells, or epithelium as judged by cell morphology or location.


   Discussion
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
References
 
Mice prone to intestinal polyposis have been used to study PG effects on adenomas. Disruption of genes in the PGE pathway supports a conclusion that PGE2 promotes tumors (28–30). Signaling pathways are being elucidated (31, 32). Here, we used knockouts of two types of PGD synthase, as well as transgenic mice with high expression of human H-PGDS, to follow up early work on blocking of cancer by PGD2 (16–19). These genes represent the only known enzymes in the PGD2 pathway from PGH2.

We found 50% more small bowel adenomas and a 2-fold increase in colon adenomas in ApcMin/+ mice deficient in H-Pgds (homozygous or heterozygous; Fig. 3; Table 1). Homozygous knockout of L-Pgds did not affect intestinal adenomas, most likely because the "brain" type of the enzyme is nearly absent in the gut.6 Conversely, there were 70% to 80% fewer adenomas in ApcMin/+ mice with transgenic H-PGDS (Fig. 3; Table 1). The drop occurred in both the small bowel and the colon. Fewer adenomas in H-PGDS transgenic mice and more adenomas in H-Pgds knockout mice strongly support an interpretation that H-PGDS, PGD2, or metabolites can inhibit tumors. Kim et al. (33) reached a similar conclusion by the use of prostate cancer cell lines cultured with prostate stromal cells that produce L-PGDS.

In the gut mucosa, H-Pgds stained in macrophages and monocytes, but generally not in other stromal cells or in the epithelium (Fig. 5). Our results confirm the original rat study, which showed H-Pgds in macrophages in the stomach, small intestine, colon, liver, spleen, and thymus (12). In particular, there were positively stained macrophages in the lamina propria of the small bowel and colon as in our slides. These two studies support an interpretation that macrophages are the major source of H-Pgds in the gastrointestinal tract, the largest macrophage pool in the body (34).

The intestinal mucosa contains cyclooxygenase-2 (Cox-2), mostly in stromal fibroblasts and endothelial cells (35, 36). Colon adenomas and carcinomas also have high levels of inducible microsomal PGE synthase (mPGES), which produces PGE2. mPGES stains readily in epithelial cells of colorectal tumors (37). Thus, PG synthesis in at least three cell types, fibroblasts, epithelial cells, and macrophages, influences adenoma growth. Specifically, PGE2 made in epithelial cells, or imported from stromal cells, seems to promote adenomas. In an opposite effect, H-PGDS in macrophages may suppress adenomas.

Involvement of macrophages in tumorigenesis has been recognized (38, 39). Tumor-associated macrophages have both stimulating and inhibitory effects (40). Stimulating factors produced by macrophages include nitric oxide synthase, vascular endothelial growth factors, matrix enzymes (e.g., metalloproteinases), and other cytokines (e.g., tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} and IL-1{alpha}; refs. 41, 42).

In an experimental example, Oshima et al. (43) produced transgenic mice with high expression of both Cox-2 and mPGES in stomach epithelium. The mice had heavy macrophage infiltration and large, benign tumors in the stomach. Treating the mice with either a Cox-2 inhibitor or antibiotics reduced macrophage infiltration and tumors. The authors hypothesized that PGE2 enhances macrophage infiltration, leading to tumors when macrophages are activated by gastric flora.

Ricote et al. (44) found evidence for blunting of macrophage activation by PGD2 metabolites. Activated peritoneal macrophages have more peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma} (PPAR{gamma}) compared with resting macrophages in bone marrow. But, activated macrophages treated with 15-deoxy-{Delta}12,14-PGJ2, a PPAR{gamma} ligand and a metabolite of PGD2, had properties of resting macrophages, such as low inducibility of nitric oxide synthetase and little or no gelatinase B (matrix metalloproteinase 9). The authors concluded that PPAR{gamma} may be a negative regulator of macrophage activation in response to PGD2 metabolites.

The nuclear factor-{kappa}B (NF-{kappa}B) pathway is a possible target for 15-deoxy-{Delta}12,14-PGJ2, both directly and through PPAR{gamma} (45). For example, Straus et al. (46) proposed that covalent binding of the compound through its cyclopentenone structure to NF-{kappa}B or I{kappa}B kinase may block activation of growth factors, cytokines, and other inflammatory proteins. Measurement of such growth-promoting molecules in tumors from ApcMin/+ mice with H-PGDS transgenes may be useful to assess this mechanism (47).

Shibata et al. (48) detected 15-deoxy-{Delta}12,14-PGJ2 in foamy macrophages of the human aorta and in RAW264.7 macrophage cells. However, Bell-Parikh et al. (49) found very low levels of this compound in preadipocytes (1 nmol/L in 3T3-L1 fibroblasts or <100 pg/106 cells). The levels were 1,000 times less than needed to cause maturation to adipocytes. Thus, the biological role of 15-deoxy-{Delta}12,14-PGJ2 as a PPAR{gamma} ligand may be limited (50).

Alternatively, transgenic H-PGPDS may suppress tumors by shifting conversion of PGH2 away from PGE2. Similarly, knockout of H-Pgds may increase tumors by routing PGH2 to PGE2 (28–32). PGD2 represents 6% of total PGs in macrophages compared with 63% for PGE2 (51). We measured urine metabolites to check for rerouting between PGD2 and PGE2.

Urine levels of 11ß-PGF2{alpha} and PGE-M, the major metabolites of PGD2 and PGE2, varied over a 12- to 30-fold range, respectively. For H-PGDS transgenic mice (all non-ApcMin/+), 11ß-PGF2{alpha} excretion was somewhat higher, and PGE-M excretion was somewhat lower than in controls. However, differences were not statistically significant (Fig. 2A and B). A possible explanation is that very high PGD2 production in transgenic mice requires cell activation, by pain, bacterial lipopolysaccharides, ethanol, or other stimuli (22). For example, Pinzar et al. found that unstimulated L-PGDS transgenic mice had only 1.5-fold more PGD2 in the brain than did WT controls. Pain stimulation (by tail clipping) led to 17-fold more brain PGD2 in one of the transgenic lines (B7). It is also possible that 24-h urinary PGs may not closely reflect PGD2 levels in the intestines. Measurement of PGD2 in gut or tumor tissue may be needed.

Null mutations of the PGD receptor (DP1) did not raise numbers of aberrant crypt foci in mice treated with the colon carcinogen, azoxymethane (30). Therefore, DP1 may not be part of a PGD2 effect. However, there have been no studies of the DP1 receptor in ApcMin/+ mice. PGD2 action through other prostanoid receptors may be possible.

The exon 2 deletion in our H-Pgds knockout mice could theoretically lead to a truncated protein, unrecognized by the antibody, which might have a dominant-negative effect on the H-Pgds dimer. However, protein translation from the next available, in-frame ATG (Met99 of exon 4) would leave out part of the dimer interface, including three important aspartic acid residues, 93, 96, and 97 (15, 21). Furthermore, mast cells from homozygous knockout mice did not contain detectable H-Pgds mRNA.7 Therefore, an altered enzyme in H-Pgds+/– mice is unlikely. The reason for increased numbers of adenomas in ApcMin/+H-Pgds+/– mice is not known. Less H-Pgds in heterozygous mice is a likely explanation.

In summary, gene knockouts of hematopoietic PGD synthase led to more adenomas in ApcMin/+ mice. Mice with higher PGD synthase expression from transgenic H-PGDS had fewer adenomas. Deletion of L-Pgds, largely expressed in the brain, did not affect tumors. Size distributions of adenomas were fairly similar across genotypes. In the intestinal mucosa, we detected H-Pgds in mainly macrophages and mononuclear cells. The results suggest that H-PGDS may take part in inhibiting adenoma growth. Mechanisms remain to be defined. Routing of PG production away from PGE2 is a possible explanation (52).


   Acknowledgments
 
Grant support: NIH grants CA73404 and CA91179 (H.J. Lin) and AA08116 (S.W. French), the Japan Foundation for Applied Enzymology (Y. Urade), the Applied Research Pilot Project for the Industrial Use of Space (supported by NASDA and the Japan Space Utilization Promotion Center; Y.Urade), and the Spanish Ministry of Science grant SAF2001-0317 (E. Salido). Osaka Bioscience Institute was supported by the city of Osaka. The General Clinical Research Center grant M01 RR00425 at Harbor-University of California-Los Angeles Medical Center provided statistical (Dr. Peter D. Christenson) and Core Laboratory (Stephanie Griffiths) support.

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


   Footnotes
 
Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Research Online (http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/).

6 K. Aritake and Y. Urade, unpublished observation. Back

7 Y. Kanaoka, unpublished observation. Back

Received 10/18/05. Revised 9/14/06. Accepted 11/27/06.


   References
Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Granström E, Lands WEM, Samuelsson B. Biosynthesis of 9{alpha},15-dihydroxy-11-ketoprost-13-enoic acid. J Biol Chem 1968;243:4104–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Nugteren DH, Hazelhof E. Isolation and properties of intermediates in prostaglandin biosynthesis. Biochim Biophys Acta 1973;326:448–61.[Medline]
  3. Ujihara M, Urade Y, Eguchi N, Hayashi H, Ikai K, Hayaishi O. Prostaglandin D2 formation and characterization of its synthetases in various tissues of adult rats. Arch Biochem Biophys 1988;260:521–31.[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Urade Y, Hayaishi O. Prostaglandin D synthase: structure and function. Vitam Horm 2000;58:89–120.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Urade Y, Eguchi N. Lipocalin-type and hematopoietic prostaglandin D synthases as a novel example of functional convergence. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat 2002;68–9:375–82.
  6. Urade Y, Hayaishi O. Biochemical, structural, genetic, physiological, and pathophysiological features of lipocalin-type prostaglandin D synthase. Biochim Biophys Acta 2000;1482:259–71.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Nagata A, Suzuki Y, Igarashi M, et al. Human brain prostaglandin D synthase has been evolutionarily differentiated from lipophilic-ligand carrier proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1991;88:4020–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. White DM, Mikol DD, Espinosa R, Weimer B, Le Beau MM, Stefansson K. Structure and chromosomal localization of the human gene for a brain form of prostaglandin D2 synthase. J Biol Chem 1992;267:23202–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Eguchi N, Minami T, Shirafuji N, et al. Lack of tactile pain (allodynia) in lipocalin-type prostaglandin D synthase-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1999;96:726–30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Christ-Hazelhof E, Nugteren DH. Purification and characterisation of prostaglandin endoperoxide D-isomerase, a cytoplasmic, glutathione-requiring enzyme. Biochim Biophys Acta 1979;572:43–51.[Medline]
  11. Urade Y, Fujimoto N, Ujihara M, Hayaishi O. Biochemical and immunological characterization of rat spleen prostaglandin D synthetase. J Biol Chem 1987;262:3820–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Urade Y, Ujihara M, Horiguchi Y, Ikai K, Hayaishi O. The major source of endogenous prostaglandin D2 production is likely antigen-presenting cells. Localization of glutathione-requiring prostaglandin D synthetase in histiocytes, dendritic, and Kupffer cells in various rat tissues. J Immunol 1989;143:2982–9.[Abstract]
  13. Kanaoka Y, Ago H, Inagaki E, et al. Cloning and crystal structure of hematopoietic prostaglandin D synthase. Cell 1997;90:1085–95.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Jowsey IR, Thomson AM, Flanagan JU, et al. Mammalian class sigma glutathione S-transferases: catalytic properties and tissue-specific expression of human and rat GSH-dependent prostaglandin D2 synthases. Biochem J 2001;359:507–16.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Inoue T, Irikura D, Okazaki N, et al. Mechanism of metal activation of human hematopoietic prostaglandin D synthase. Nat Struct Biol 2003;10:291–6.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Stringfellow DA, Fitzpatrick FA. Prostaglandin D2 controls pulmonary metastasis of malignant melanoma cells. Nature 1979;282:76–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Fukushima M, Kato T, Ota K, Arai Y, Narumiya S, Hayaishi O. 9-Deoxy-{Delta}9-prostaglandin D2, a prostaglandin D2 derivative with potent antineoplastic and weak smooth muscle-contracting activities. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1982;109:626–33.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Kato T, Fukushima M, Kurozumi S, Noyori R. Antitumor activity of {Delta}7-prostaglandin A1 and {Delta}12-prostaglandin J2 in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Res 1986;46:3538–42.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Narumiya S, Ohno K, Fukushima M, Fujiwara M. Site and mechanism of growth inhibition by prostaglandins. III. Distribution and binding of prostaglandin A2 and {Delta}12-prostaglandin J2 in nuclei. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1987;242:306–11.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Su L-K, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, et al. Multiple intestinal neoplasia caused by a mutation in the murine homolog of the APC gene. Science 1992;256:668–70.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Kanaoka Y, Fujimori K, Kikuno R, Sakaguchi Y, Urade Y, Hayaishi O. Structure and chromosomal localization of human and mouse genes for hematopoietic prostaglandin D synthase. Conservation of the ancestral genomic structure of sigma-class glutathione S-transferase. Eur J Biochem 2000;267:3315–22.[Medline]
  22. Pinzar E, Kanaoka Y, Inui T, Eguchi N, Urade Y, Hayaishi O. Prostaglandin D synthase gene is involved in the regulation of non-rapid eye movement sleep. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000;97:4903–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Moser AR, Dove WF, Roth KA, Gordon JI. The Min (multiple intestinal neoplasia) mutation: its effect on gut epithelial cell differentiation and interaction with a modifier system. J Cell Biol 1992;116:1517–26.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Jones CJP, Mosley SM, Jeffrey IJM, Stoddart RW. Elimination of the non-specific binding of avidin to tissue sections. Histochem J 1987;19:264–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Pinzar E, Miyano M, Kanaoka Y, Urade Y, Hayaishi O. Structural basis of hematopoietic prostaglandin D synthase activity elucidated by site-directed mutagenesis. J Biol Chem 2000;275:31239–44.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. O'Sullivan S, Mueller MJ, Dahlén S-E, Kumlin M. Analyses of prostaglandin D2 metabolites in urine: comparison between enzyme immunoassay and negative ion chemical ionisation gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat 1999;57:149–65.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Gross ND, Boyle JO, Morrow JD, et al. Levels of prostaglandin E metabolite, the major urinary metabolite of prostaglandin E2, are increased in smokers. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:6087–93.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Sonoshita M, Takaku K, Sasaki N, et al. Acceleration of intestinal polyposis through prostaglandin receptor EP2 in Apc{Delta}716 knockout mice. Nat Med 2001;7:1048–51.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Watanabe K, Kawamori T, Nakatsugi S, et al. Role of the prostaglandin E receptor subtype EP1 in colon carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 1999;59:5093–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Mutoh M, Watanabe K, Kitamura T, et al. Involvement of prostaglandin E receptor subtype EP4 in colon carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 2002;62:28–32.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Wang D, DuBois RN. Prostaglandins and cancer. Gut 2006;55:115–22.[Free Full Text]
  32. Castellone MD, Teramoto H, Williams BO, Druey KM, Gutkind JS. Prostaglandin E2 promotes colon cancer cell growth through a Gs-axin-ß-catenin signaling axis. Science 2005;310:1504–10.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Kim J, Yang P, Suraokar M, et al. Suppression of prostate tumor cell growth by stromal cell prostaglandin D synthase-derived products. Cancer Res 2005;65:6189–98.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Smith PD, Ochsenbauer-Jambor C, Smythies LE. Intestinal macrophages: unique effector cells of the innate immune system. Immunol Rev 2005;206:149–59.[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Sonoshita M, Takaku K, Oshima M, Sugihara K, Taketo MM. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in fibroblasts and endothelial cells of intestinal polyps. Cancer Res 2002;62:6846–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Adegboyega PA, Ololade O, Saada J, Mifflin R, DiMari JF, Powell DW. Subepithelial myofibroblasts express cyclooxygenase-2 in colorectal tubular adenomas. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:5870–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Yoshimatsu K, Golijanin D, Paty PB, et al. Inducible microsomal prostaglandin E synthase is overexpressed in colorectal adenomas and cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2001;7:3971–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Balkwill F, Mantovani A. Inflammation and cancer: back to Virchow? Lancet 2001;357:539–45.[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Lewis CE, Pollard JW. Distinct role of macrophages in different tumor microenvironments. Cancer Res 2006;66:605–12.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. van der Bij GJ, Oosterling SJ, Meijer S, Beelen RHJ, van Egmond M. The role of macrophages in tumor development. Cell Oncol 2005;27:203–13.[Medline]
  41. Ono M, Torisu H, Fukushi J, Nishie A, Kuwano M. Biological implications of macrophage infiltration in human tumor angiogenesis. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1999;43:S69–71.
  42. Torisu H, Ono M, Kiryu H, et al. Macrophage infiltration correlates with tumor stage and angiogenesis in human malignant melanoma: possible involvement of TNF{alpha} and IL-1{alpha}. Int J Cancer 2000;85:182–8.[Medline]
  43. Oshima H, Oshima M, Inaba K, Taketo MM. Hyperplastic gastric tumors induced by activated macrophages in COX-2/mPGES-1 transgenic mice. EMBO J 2004;23:1669–78.[CrossRef][Medline]
  44. Ricote M, Li AC, Willson TM, Kelly CJ, Glass CK. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-{gamma} is a negative regulator of macrophage activation. Nature 1998;391:79–82.[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Valledor AF, Ricote M. Nuclear receptor signaling in macrophages. Biochem Pharmacol 2004;67:201–12.[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. Straus DS, Pascual G, Li M, et al. 15-Deoxy-{Delta}12,14-prostaglandin J2 inhibits multiple steps in the NF-{kappa}B signaling pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000;97:4844–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Greten FR, Eckmann L, Greten TF, et al. IKKß links inflammation and tumorigenesis in a mouse model of colitis-associated cancer. Cell 2004;118:285–96.[CrossRef][Medline]
  48. Shibata T, Kondo M, Osawa T, Shibata N, Kobayashi M, Uchida K. 15-Deoxy-{Delta}12,14-prostaglandin J2. A prostaglandin D2 metabolite generated during inflammatory processes. J Biol Chem 2002;277:10459–66.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Bell-Parikh LC, Ide T, Lawson JA, McNamara P, Reilly M, FitzGerald GA. Biosynthesis of 15-deoxy-{Delta}12,14-PGJ2 and the ligation of PPAR{gamma}. J Clin Invest 2003;112:945–55.[CrossRef][Medline]
  50. Girnun GD, Smith WM, Drori S, et al. APC-dependent suppression of colon carcinogenesis by PPAR{gamma}. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99:13771–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Trebino CE, Eskra JD, Wachtmann TS, Perez JR, Carty TJ, Audoly LP. Redirection of eicosanoid metabolism in mPGES-1-deficient macrophages. J Biol Chem 2005;280:16579–85.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Myung S-J, Rerko RM, Yan M, et al. 15-Hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase is an in vivo suppressor of colon tumorigenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006;103:12098–102.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 CarcinogenesisHome page
A. E. Moore, A. Greenhough, H. R. Roberts, D. J. Hicks, H. A. Patsos, A. C. Williams, and C. Paraskeva
HGF/Met signalling promotes PGE2 biogenesis via regulation of COX-2 and 15-PGDH expression in colorectal cancer cells
Carcinogenesis, October 1, 2009; 30(10): 1796 - 1804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Park, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lin, H. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Park, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lin, H. J.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online