| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Immunology |
Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
Requests for reprints: Karl Erik Hellström, Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Box 35 99 39, Harborview Medical Center, 325 Ninth Avenue, Seattle, WA 98109-2499. Phone: 206-341-4714; E-mail: hells{at}u.washington.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
or tumor necrosis factor-
. We further show that the percentage of NK cells was higher in B16-1D8 melanomas expressing anti-CD137 scFv than in the WT tumors and that the percentage of FoxP3+ cells was lower. Admixture of 10% K1735-1D8 cells prevented the progressive growth of transplanted K1735-WT cells in syngeneic mice and also of cells from the antigenically different sarcoma Ag104. Inhibition of WT tumor cells by tumor cells transfected to express anti-CD137 scFv was shown also with the TC1 carcinoma and B16 melanoma. Furthermore, injection of an adenovirus vector, Ad-1D8, which encodes anti-CD137 scFv into established B16 melanomas, significantly prolonged the survival of tumor-bearing mice and could induce regression. Our data suggest that targeting of anti-CD137 scFv to tumors should be explored for therapy for some human cancers. [Cancer Res 2007;67(5):233944] | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We previously showed that cells from the K1735 melanoma, which have low immunogenicity and which express little MHC class I and lack class II, after transfection to express anti-CD137 scFv, are rejected by syngeneic mice, unless these are treated with antibodies to remove CD4+ T cells, and that antibodies to natural killer (NK) cells delay the rejection (4). According to immunohistology, tumor rejection was accompanied by an increased number of infiltrating CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes. Based on these findings, we hypothesized that the CD4+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) were of the T helper 1 (Th1) type, that the frequency of NK cells was increased in tumors formed by K1735 cells expressing anti-CD137 scFv, and that this can cause the destruction also of neighboring, wild-type (WT) tumor cells. Data presented here support this hypothesis and indicate that targeting protocols causing the expression, by at least some of the cells within a tumor, of an antibody-like signal that engages CD137 can be therapeutically effective.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Experiments were also done in which mice that had
3 x 3-mm tumors growing s.c. on the right side of the back were injected i.p. with 2 mg of cyclophosphamide (9), followed 4 and 5 days later by i.t. injection of 109 plaque-forming units (pfu) of an adenovirus vector, Ad-1D8 (see below), which was injected in 50-µL PBS, whereas controls were injected with 50-µL PBS into the tumors. For comparison, another group of mice received 5 x 108 pfu of a similarly constructed vector encoding CD80 and the same amount of a vector encoding anti-CD3 scFv.
Tumor growth was measured after s.c. transplantation of tumor cells on one or both (see Results) sides of the back of syngeneic mice by measuring the two largest perpendicular diameters with calipers and reported as average tumor area (in square millimeters).
Mice with established tumors of >5-mm mean diameter were checked daily, and, to prevent suffering, mice were euthanized when their tumors reached an average area of 100 mm2. The time for transplanted tumors to reach that size is referred to as survival. Evidence of "biological activity" was recorded as CR, complete regression of an established tumor; PR, >50% decrease of an established tumor; and stabilization, no increase of tumor size for a minimum of 1 week.
The animal facilities are Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care certified and our protocols were approved by the respective Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (at Pacific Northwest Research Institute for the initial studies and at University of Washington for the subsequent work).
Vectors and transfection of tumor cells. As previously reported (4), K1735-1D8 cells were engineered by transfecting a retrovirus vector expressing the variable region genes from the anti-CD137 rat hybridoma 1D8 (10), using published techniques (11), and the same approach was taken to engineer TC1 and B16 cells, establishing the TC1-1D8 and B16-1D8 lines. The cells transfected with the 1D8 gene express surface-bound anti-CD137 scFv from hybridoma 1D8 whereas the WT cells do not. We previously showed that K1735-WT cells transfected to express the product of a similarly constructed control vector encoding antihuman CD28 scFv do not induce a tumor-destructive immune response (4).
To produce an adenovirus vector, Ad-1D8, the 1D8 gene (3) was cloned into pAd.RSV (8) as HindIII/blunted XbaI fragment under the control of the Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) promoter. Recombinant Ad-1D8 virus was produced in 293 cells by recombination with pBHG10 (Microbix, Toronto, Canada) and virus was banded in CsCl gradients, dialyzed, and stored in aliquots as described elsewhere (12, 13). Titers were determined by plaque titration on 293 cells and the contamination with the WT virus was examined by real-time PCR. Only vector preparations that contained less than one WT viral genome in 106 genomes were used in further studies. Lack of endotoxin contamination was shown with a Limulus amoebocyte lysate entotoxin detection kit (BioWhittaker, Walkerville, MD). A similar approach was applied to construct vectors encoding mouse CD80 (14) and antimouse CD3 (15), which were tested in parallel with an Ad-1D8 vector for comparison. I.t. adenoviral injections were done with 50 µL of adenovirus vectors in PBS.
Analysis of tissues by flow cytometry. The following labeled rat anti-mouse monoclonal antibodies (mAb) were purchased from BD PharMingen (San Diego, CA): CD3-phycoerythrin (PE), CD4-FITC, CD8-FITC, and NK1.1-PE. Rat anti-mouse IFN
-PE and tumor necrosis factor
(TNF
)-PE were purchased from Beckman Coulter (Miami, FL). A FoxP3-FITC mAb was bought from eBiosciences (San Diego, CA). For detection of intracellular cytokines, cells were first stained with anti-CD4-FITC followed by staining for intracellular IFN
and TNF
, using a kit purchased from BD PharMingen. For detection of FoxP3, cells were first fixed with IntraPrep Permeabilization reagent (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA) according to the manufacturer's protocol.
Mice were euthanized when their tumors had a mean diameter of 4 to 6 mm following transplantation of 2 x 106 to 4 x 106 cells from either K1735-WT or K1735-1D8, which was 4 to 10 days after transplantation before the latter tumors started to regress (4). We also analyzed lymphoid cells from mice transplanted s.c. with a mixture of 10% K1735-1D8 plus 90% K1735-WT cells.
Spleen and lymph node cell suspensions were mechanically prepared, and the spleen cells were incubated with RBC lysing buffer (Sigma) for 5 min at room temperature. Tumors were cut into 1-mm2 pieces and digested for 3 h at room temperature in 1 mmol/L HEPES Hanks buffer containing 5 units/mL collagenase, 0.1% hyaluronidase, and 0.01% DNase, using enzymes purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). The suspensions were filtered, the cells collected by centrifugation, and erythrocytes lysed. After washing with PBS, cells were added to a mouse lymphocyte isolation buffer (Cedarlane, Ontario, Canada) and centrifuged at 200 x g for 20 min, after which the lymphocyte band was collected and the resulting TILs were washed with PBS. After counting, the TILs were stained and analyzed.
Single-cell suspensions were washed in PBS, resuspended in FACS buffer (PBS + 2% fetal calf serum), and aliquoted into Falcon plates at 5 x 104 per well in 100-µL FACS buffer. After staining, the cells were collected, washed twice in 100-µL FACS buffer, resuspended in a mixture of 100-µL FACS buffer and 500-µL PBS, and analyzed within 30 min using Coulter Epics FACS and the Coulter Epics x 1.2 software program. The percentages of PE- or FITC-positive cells in the gated cell populations were compared for each group tested.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
or TNF
, a characteristic of Th1 type cells, was higher in spleens, lymph nodes, and tumors from mice transplanted with either K1735-1D8 cells or a mixture of K1735-1D8 and K1735-WT cells than in the corresponding tissues from the group transplanted with WT cells alone.
|
|
Experiments were then done based on our hypothesis that the increased number of NK cells and CD4 cells producing IFN
and TNF
in the presence of K1735-1D8 cells will inhibit the outgrowth also of cells from a different tumor. Fig. 1B depicts an experiment (five mice per group) to test this hypothesis. We mixed WT cells from the antigenically unrelated, syngeneic sarcoma Ag104 with (untreated) K1735-1D8 cells at various ratios and transplanted mixtures composed of 2 x 106 Ag104 cells to each mouse. Mice that received Ag104 cells alone developed progressively growing tumors. In contrast, mixtures of 1 K1735-1D8 cell per 1, 10, or 100 Ag104 cells did not form tumors, except in two of five mice receiving 1 K1735-1D8 cell per 100 Ag104 cells, which developed tumors after a long latency period. The experiment was repeated with similar results.
To investigate whether these findings have general validity, we used two additional models, the TC1 carcinoma and the B16 melanoma. Figure 1C shows that addition of an equal amount of MMC-sterilized TC1-1D8 cells, as compared with MMC-treated TC1-WT cells, significantly (P < 0.001 on days 17 and 22 after tumor transplantation) delayed tumor formation by TC1-WT cells; there was no difference in tumor growth in mice that received live TC1-WT cells alone or admixed with MMC-treated TC1-WT cells. There was also some, but not statistically significant, delay of tumor outgrowth when 50,000 MMC-treated TC1-1D8 cells were admixed to 250,000 TC1-WT cells.
Evidence for a "bystander effect" against WT cells was seen also in the B16 model, where addition of 2 MMC-treated B16-1D8 cells per WT cell inhibited growth (P < 0.001 for the difference in tumor areas on day 14 after tumor transplantation) of the WT cells. The data are presented for individual tumors in Fig. 1D. Five mice per group were transplanted s.c. on both sides of the back, providing 10 tumor sites per group. There were three complete, albeit short-lived, tumor regressions in the group with the admixed B16-1D8 cells. The experiment was repeated with similar results.
Therapeutic vaccination of mice with B16 melanoma by i.t. injection of an adenovirus vector encoding anti-CD137 scFv. Based on the above findings, experiments were done with the B16 melanoma, which was chosen in spite of the fact that B16 is less sensitive to the bystander effect than K1735, Ag104, or TC1. Mice were transplanted with 2 x 105 B16 cells on one side of the back and, when they had
3 x 3 mm tumors, they were, based on previous findings in other vaccination experiments (9), injected with 2 mg of cyclophosphamide to decrease the effect of TReg cells, followed 4 and 5 days later with i.t. injection of an adenovirus vector, Ad-1D8, which encodes anti-CD137 scFv. We also included a group in which tumors were injected with a mixture of two similarly prepared adenovirus constructs, one encoding CD80 and one encoding anti-CD3 scFv. As shown in Table 4
, survival, defined as the time until mice had to be euthanized because their tumors reached 100 mm2 surface area, was significantly prolonged in mice whose tumors had been injected with the Ad-1D8 vector. In contrast, s.c. transplantation of 2 x 106 MMC-treated B16-1D8 cells had no therapeutic effect with the mice surviving 17.0 ± 3.1 days as compared with 17.2 ± 1.8 days for mice transplanted with the same dose of MMC-treated B16-WT cells. A combination of adenovirus vectors encoding CD80 and anti-CD3 scFv did not significantly prolong survival; these negative data, using similarly constructed vectors, are important in view of the fact that a "dummy" adenovirus control was not available at the time. There was evidence of biological activity, including two CR, in the group vaccinated with the Ad-1D8 vector but not in the other groups, except for temporary stabilization of tumor growth in one of ten mice given the Ad-CD80 + Ad-anti-CD3 scFv vectors. The experiment was repeated with similar results.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and TNF
. Our data also indicate that engagement of CD137 can negatively influence the generation of TReg cells, a matter that needs to be studied further.
We hypothesized that the ability of K1735-1D8 cells to attract NK cells, CD8+ T cells, and Th1-type CD4+ T cells can cause tumor destruction and showed that admixture of even a small proportion (10%) of K1735-1D8 cells prevented the outgrowth of transplanted K1735-WT cells. We next investigated whether the increased number of NK cells and CD4 lymphocytes that produce IFN
and TNF
in the presence of K1735-1D8 cells could inhibit the outgrowth also of cells from a different syngeneic tumor, Ag104. This was found to be the case. The findings with Ag104 are of particular interest because mice immunized against K1735 reject transplanted K1735, but not Ag104, cells and develop CD4+ and CD8+ T cells that recognize K1735 but not Ag104 (4). They are also noteworthy in view of the lack of immunogenicity of Ag104 when tested by classic transplantation experiments (6).
To investigate whether these findings have general validity, we used two additional models, TC1 carcinoma and B16 melanoma, for in vivo studies. Tumor growth was inhibited in the presence of cells transfected with the 1D8 gene also in these models, although the effects seen were smaller than those observed with K1735, perhaps because the K1735-M2 clone is more immunogenic.
The bystander effect, as studied in the K1735 model, is not antigen specific and we hypothesize that Th1 type lymphokines such as TNF
and IFN
are at least partially responsible by acting on NK cells and probably also on macrophages, as shown in other systems (17, 18), as well as by affecting the tumor cells directly and damaging the tumor vasculature. Whereas the role of CTL against K1735 tumors seems to be minor, this is not the case in many other systems, wherein lymphokines such as TNF
and IFN
are likely to expand the CTL activity. Most likely, there may also be antigen-specific bystander effects (e.g., when WT and 1D8-transfected cells are combined from the same tumor).
Administration of an agonistic mAb is the most straightforward approach to engage CD137 (23). However, working in a transgenic model with carcinomas expressing epitopes encoded by the neu gene, Zhang et al. (24) found that vaccination with cells transfected to express anti-CD137 scFv was more efficacious and less toxic than administration of anti-CD137 mAb. According to published data, immunization via transfected anti-CD137 scFv is more therapeutically efficacious than immunization with cells expressing the CD137 ligand (4, 23, 25), perhaps because the ligand can induce T-cell apoptosis (26) whereas scFv induces an antibody-like response in the presence of the relevant tumor antigens.
To study whether delivery of anti-CD137 scFv to tumors could be therapeutically effective, we transplanted mice with B16 melanoma cells and, when they had small palpable tumors, injected them with 2 mg cyclophosphamide to decrease the effect of TReg cells (2, 9). I.t. injection of an adenovirus vector, Ad-1D8, which encodes anti-CD137 scFv, given 4 and 5 days later, delayed tumor growth as compared with mice whose tumors were injected with PBS or with a combination of vectors encoding CD80 and anti-CD3 scFv. There was also evidence of biological activity, including CR and PR, in some of the mice whose tumors were injected with Ad-1D8. It is noteworthy that s.c. transplantation of MMC-treated B16-1D8 cells had no therapeutic effect (i.e., immune stimulation by anti-CD137 scFv had to be targeted to the tumor site). In contrast, s.c. transplanted, MMC-treated K1735-1D8 cells were shown to be effective against K1735-WT tumors of similar size (4).
Tumor cell populations continously undergo genetic changes (27), which cause the emergence of variants that have lost tumor antigens and/or the mechanisms needed for antigen presentation. In addition, the conditions under which tumors grow can influence antigen expression. Consequently, all cells within a tumor are highly unlikely to express and present those antigens that are commonly the targets for immunotherapy. For tumor vaccination or adoptive transfer of immune T cells to be clinically successful, also those tumor cells that lack or fail to present the antigen vaccinated against need to be destroyed. The same is true for administration of antitumor antibodies. We speculate, therefore, as have others (28), that the dramatic therapeutic effects seen in some patients given an antitumor antibody such as 17.1A (29) are secondary to the antibody-mediated induction of an active immune response, and the same may explain the decrease in large tumor masses in occasional patients given an antibody construct targeting Lewis Y (30). Our data suggest that the targeting of anti-CD137 scFv to tumors and tumor-draining lymph nodes may facilitate the generation of an immune response that involves effector cells capable of also killing antigen-negative tumor cells, as shown by our data with sarcoma Ag104, together with the generation of an antigen-specific response as indicated by previous data (4). As indicated by our data in the B16 model, the delivery of anti-CD137 scFv to the tumor site is more therapeutically effective than the s.c. administration of a tumor vaccine. A bispecific antibody (31) or a tumor-seeking, recombinant virus (32) may be a suitable vehicle for such targeting, and the therapeutic efficacy may be further increased by incorporating additional immunostimulatory agent(s) and by finding more specific drugs than cyclophosphamide to circumvent down-regulatory mechanisms. An advantage of the targeting is that it may facilitate the generation of immune responses to a variety of epitopes expressed by the given tumor.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
We thank Dr. N. Kiviat for her support; Drs. J.A. Ledbetter and M. Hayden-Ledbetter for discussions when the studies were initiated; Dr. M.L. Disis and H.O. Sjogren for comments on the manuscript; Daniel Bushyhead for technical assistance; and Pacific Northwest Research Institute, where the study was initiated, for permission for continued use of their flow cytometry facility.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Initial studies were done when Y. Yang, S. Yang, Z. Ye, I. Hellström, and K.E. Hellström were working at Pacific Northwest Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98122.
Received 9/27/06. Revised 11/14/06. Accepted 12/13/06.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Gil, M. Bieniasz, A. Wierzbicki, B. J. Bambach, H. Rokita, and D. Kozbor Targeting a Mimotope Vaccine to Activating Fc{gamma} Receptors Empowers Dendritic Cells to Prime Specific CD8+ T Cell Responses in Tumor-Bearing Mice J. Immunol., November 15, 2009; 183(10): 6808 - 6818. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-H. Lee, Y.-H. Chiang, S.-E. Chang, C.-L. Chong, B.-M. Cheng, and S. R. Roffler Tumor-Localized Ligation of CD3 and CD28 with Systemic Regulatory T-Cell Depletion Induces Potent Innate and Adaptive Antitumor Responses Clin. Cancer Res., April 15, 2009; 15(8): 2756 - 2766. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. K. Choi, Y. H. Kim, W. J. Kang, S. K. Lee, K. H. Kim, S. M. Shin, W. M. Yokoyama, T. Y. Kim, and B. S. Kwon Mechanisms Involved in Synergistic Anticancer Immunity of Anti-4-1BB and Anti-CD4 Therapy Cancer Res., September 15, 2007; 67(18): 8891 - 8899. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |