| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Molecular Biology, Pathobiology, and Genetics |
1 Hormonal Carcinogenesis Laboratory, Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Therapeutics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas and 2 The Tumor Biology Program, Division of Experimental Pathology, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota
Requests for reprints: Jonathan J. Li, Department of Pharmacology, Mail Stop 1018, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS 66160. Phone: 913-588-4758; Fax: 913-588-4740; E-mail: jli1{at}kumc.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
. Aurora A coenriched with the centrosome fraction isolated from tumors in the kidney. Centrosome amplification (number and area/cell) was detected in early tumor foci and large tumors but not in adjacent uninvolved or age-matched control kidneys. Taken together, these data indicate that persistent overexpression of Aurora A and B is under estrogen control, and is coincident with centrosome amplification, chromosomal instability, and aneuploidy, and represent an important mechanism driving tumorigenesis. [Cancer Res 2007;67(7):295763] | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.3 ± 0.4 nmol/L/mL) and very low E2 concentrations in renal tissue (4.6 pg/mg protein; ref. 5). These E2 levels are comparable with those reported in human breast tissue in cycling women (
5.25.8 pg/mg protein; refs. 6, 7).
These E2-elicited tumors arise in the kidney from ectopic uterine-like germinal stem cells found in the interstitium and primarily located in the corticomedullary region, the earliest region in kidney development (810). Moreover, complimentary cytogenetic techniques have clearly shown that both E2-induced early tumorous lesions and primary tumors of the kidney are highly aneuploid (9294%; refs. 8, 11). They occur coincident with, and may be downstream consequences of c-myc/MYC overexpression, c-myc amplification, and deregulation of the cell cycle; i.e., overexpressed cyclins D1, E, cdk2 and cdk4, and MDM2 driven by estrogen receptor
(ER
; refs. 12, 13). However, it is presently unclear how E2-induced deregulation of c-myc and cell cycle entities result in large-scale genomic instability and tumorigenesis.
Recently, it has been proposed that the elevated expression of mitotic kinases, especially Aurora A and B, are crucial events in the cascade leading to centrosome amplification, chromosomal instability, and aneuploidy, thus, driving oncogenesis (14, 15). The Aurora family of serine/threonine kinases is essential for the orderly progression of mitosis (16, 17). Aurora A, the most intensively studied mitotic kinase, localizes to centrosomes, has a critical role in regulating centrosome duplication, maturation, and separation, spindle assembly and stability, as well as chromosome condensation, segregation, and cytokinesis (1417). Importantly, Aurora A overexpression has been shown to elicit neoplastic transformation in mammalian cells, both in vivo and in vitro (1820), thus behaving as a bona fide oncogene. It is noteworthy that Aurora kinase (A/B) expression is nominal in resting cells and transiently detectable in normal proliferating cells (21, 22). The levels of Aurora B mRNA and protein expression, like those of Aurora A, peak at G2-M phase, and their maximum kinase activity is attained at the transition from metaphase to the completion of mitosis (14, 16). Present evidence indicates that Aurora B, considered a passenger protein, targets the centromere at metaphase to phosphorylate histone H3, regulates proper chromosome segregation, and translocates the inner centromere protein (INCENP) and possibly survivin to the spindle mid-zone required for the regulation of cytokinesis. Thus, Aurora B is a key regulator of accurate chromosome segregation via the control of microtubule-kinetochore attachment and cytokinesis (16, 2325).
In the current study, we show for the first time a concerted and sustained overexpression of both Aurora A and B and coincident centrosome amplification in solely E2-induced early tumorous foci and in large, well-established tumors in the hamster kidney. These findings further support the concept that E2-mediated oncogenesis occurs by a common pathway via sustained Aurora kinase overexpression, which in turn, generates amplified centrosomes, chromosomal instability, aneuploidy, and tumor formation.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Western blot. Kidneys and tumors were homogenized in lysis buffer containing 50 mmol/L of Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 0.2 mol/L of NaCl, 2 mmol/L of EDTA, 0.5% NP40, 50 mmol/L of NaF, 0.5 mmol/L of Na3VO4, 20 mmol/L of Na-pyrophosphate, 1 mmol/L of phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/mL of aprotinin, 10 µg/mL of leupeptin, and 1 mmol/L of DTT. The supernatant fractions were collected and their protein content determined with bicinchoninic acid reagents (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Proteins were separated by gel electrophoresis on PAGEr Gold Precast Gels (Cambrex Bio Science Rockland, Inc., Rockland, ME) and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. Primary antibodies against Aurora A BL656 (1:1,000; Bethyl Labs, Montgomery, TX), Aurora B ab2254 (1:1,000; Abcam, Cambridge, MA), Centrin MCI (1:25,000; Salisbury, JL, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN), and
-tubulin MMR58 (1:10,000; Salisbury, JL), were incubated overnight at 4°C. Appropriate secondary antibodies were incubated for 2 h and protein expression was visualized with enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ). Densitometry was done using Alpha Imager 2000 (Alpha Innotech, San Leandro, CA).
In vitro protein kinase assay. Proteins were extracted as described for Western blotting. Aliquots, 200 µg of total protein extracts, were incubated for 2 h at room temperature with 1 µg of Aurora A BL469 (Bethyl Labs) followed by a 2-h incubation with 30 µL of A/G agarose slurry. Normal IgG was used as a negative control. Immunoprecipitated complexes were washed several times with PBS and immediately used for kinase assays (Upstate, Inc., Charlottesville, VA) following the manufacturer's standard protocol with modifications. Immunoprecipitates were incubated for 30 min at 30°C with 5x reaction buffer [40 mmol/L MOPS (pH 7.0), 1 mmol/L EDTA], 10 µCi/µL of [32P]
ATP (Amersham Biosciences) diluted in Upstate Mg/ATP cocktail. Reactions were spotted onto P81 paper, subjected to a series of washes in 0.75% phosphoric acid and acetone, and counts per minute measured using a scintillation counter (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA).
Reverse transcriptase PCR and real-time PCR. All reagents for reverse transcriptase and real-time PCR were purchased from Invitrogen Corp., Carlsbad, CA. Total RNA was extracted using the protocol supplied by Life Technologies (Gaithersburg, MD) for Trizol Reagent. Aliquots,
100 mg of hamster kidney tissue and E2-induced primary tumors were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and pulverized while still frozen. The pulverized tissue was then placed into 3 mL of Trizol and homogenized using a Polytron. All samples were centrifuged at 12,000 x g for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant was then transferred to a fresh tube and incubated at room temperature for 5 min before adding 0.2 mL of chloroform/1 mL of Trizol. The tubes were capped, shaken vigorously, and incubated for 3 min at room temperature. The tubes were centrifuged at 12,000 x g for 15 min at 4°C. Total RNA was then precipitated with 0.5 mL of isopropanol/1 mL of Trizol. The tubes were incubated at 80°C for 30 min and then centrifuged at 12,000 x g for 10 min at 4°C. The RNA pellet was washed in 1 mL of 75% ethanol/diethyl pyrocarbonate and centrifuged at 7,500 x g for 5 min at 4°C. After briefly drying, the pellet was resuspended in 100 µL of diethyl pyrocarbonate water and stored at 80°C. RNA integrity was evaluated by agarose gel electrophoresis and the concentration of the RNA was determined by spectrometry.
Reverse transcription was done using 5 µg of total RNA/5 µL. The RNA was combined with 250 ng of random primers, 10 mmol/L of deoxynucleotide triphosphate mix, and sterile distilled water. This mixture was heated at 65°C for 5 min and quick-chilled on ice. 5x first strand buffer, 0.1 mol/L of DTT, and Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase was added to each sample and the reverse transcription reaction was done using an iCycler thermocycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). The thermocycling protocol consisted of 1 h incubation at 37°C followed by 10 min incubation at 96°C. The samples were stored at 4°C until used for PCR analysis.
The cDNA synthesized during the reverse transcription reaction was used to perform the real-time PCR reaction. cDNA was amplified using the Platinum SYBR Green qPCR SuperMix UDG and gene-specific primers for ß-actin (FWD 5-CAGCCGAGAGGGAAATTGTG-3'; REV 5-TCGTTGCCAATGGTGATGAC-3'; 101 bp amplicon) and Aurora A (FWD 5-TGGGTGTGTGCCTCGAAA; REV 5-GATTGAAGGCCGGATGCA; 102 bp amplicon) in a 7300 Real-time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Myc gene amplification was used as a positive control (FWD 5-TGATGTCGTGTCTGTGGAAAAGA; REV 5-GTTTGCTGTGGCCTCCTGAT; 83 bp amplicon). The baseline was set automatically, as was the threshold Ct value measured during the exponential phase of the amplification. The thermocycling protocol consisted of 2 min incubation at 50°C followed by 10 min incubation at 95°C. Then, the samples underwent 40 cycles at 95°C for 45 s, 60°C for 45 s, and 72°C for 45 s. The specificity of the amplicon was verified by running a dissociation step.
Immunohistochemical analysis. Kidneys were excised, trimmed, and fixed in 5% paraformaldehyde, followed by a rapid paraffin-embedding process. Tissue sections (6 µm) were prepared and dewaxed. Antigens were retrieved (Dako Target Retrieval Solution; Dako, Carpinteria, CA) by heating in a water bath set at 97°C for 20 min or a digital decloaking chamber (Biocare Medical, Concord, CA) and treated with 3% H2O2 for 15 min to block endogenous peroxidases. After blocking with 6% of the appropriate serum in 1% bovine serum albumin, the primary antibodies, ER
clone 1D5 (Dako), progesterone receptor (PR) C-19 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), Aurora A BL656 (Bethyl Labs), and Aurora B ab2254 (Abcam), diluted 1:50 (1:1,000 for Aurora A), were applied to the sections overnight at 4°C. Appropriate secondary antibodies were incubated for 1 h at 25°C followed by 1 h with Vector Laboratories Elite ABC (Burlingame, CA). As negative controls, similar tissue sections were incubated replacing the primary antibodies with the appropriate normal serum. The slides were counterstained with hematoxylin, dehydrated in alcohol, and mounted in Permount medium (1:1 permount/xylene) before being examined under the microscope.
Enrichment of amplified tumor centrosomes. The isolation of amplified E2-induced tumor centrosomes was done according to Moudjou and Bornens (27) with minor modifications. Primary tumors (810 g) from the kidney were minced and brought to 50 mL in culture medium containing 10 µL cytochalasin, 10 µL nocodazole, and 50 µL protease inhibitor cocktail, all obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). The minced tumor was incubated for 30 min at 4°C, washed and then resuspended in 0.1x TBS/8% sucrose containing 2 µL of cytochalasin, 2 µL of nocodazole, and 10 µL of protease inhibitor cocktail and pressed through a stainless steel sieve and filtered through a 105-µm nylon mesh monofilament cloth (Small Parts, Inc., Miami Lakes, FL). The resulting cell suspension was lysed in a buffer containing 1 mmol/L of Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 0.1% 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.5% Triton X-100, and 1x protease inhibitors, homogenized in a glass dounce, and centrifuged at 2,500 x g for 10 min. The lysate was placed in a 50 mL tube, underlaid with 60% sucrose, and centrifuged at 10,000 x g for 30 min. The upper 25 mL fraction was carefully aspirated off, and the remaining sample was vortexed, overlaid onto a vegetable-dyed sucrose gradient (70%, 50%, and 40% sucrose), and centrifuged at 40,000 x g for 1 h. The gradient was fractionated into 25 0.5-mL portions [Fraction Collector and Econo Pump (Bio-Rad Laboratories) Fractionation System (Brandel, Gaithersburg, MD)]. The fraction volumes were brought to 1.5 mL with gradient buffer [10 mmol/L PIPES (pH 7.2), 0.1% Triton X-100 and 0.1% 2-mercaptoethanol], vortexed, and centrifuged at 50,000 x g for 1 h. The supernatant was discarded and the pelleted fractions were stored at 80°C for further analysis.
Centrosome amplification: size and number. Centrosome size and number were analyzed by confocal microscopy of paraffin sections immunolabeled with a monoclonal antibody against the centrosomal protein
-tubulin (28). Kidney tissues from age-matched control and E2-treated hamsters for 3, 4, and 8 months were analyzed (n = 3/group). For centrosome evaluation in tumor lesions, tumor foci were first identified in serial sections stained with H&E and PR (C19) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Once the foci were identified, subsequent serial sections were immunolabeled with
-tubulin and Hoechst 33342, to label the centrosomes and the nuclei, respectively (29). Confocal image stacks of seven 5-µm/L-thick slices were captured with a Zeiss 510 confocal microscope using a 63x oil immersion objective. Image stacks were then processed to yield a single maximum intensity projection image. The resulting image was imported into ImageJ (NIH Image) for analysis. The
-tubulin signal was thresholded consistently for all the images collected for each tissue. The thresholded images were then binarized and the area of each
-tubulinlabeled spot measured and counted. Cells were counted manually according to the number of nuclei present within an image. On average, 500 cells per tissue category were analyzed; 106 cells was the minimum number analyzed. The size of the epithelial cell centrosomes were normalized against centrosomes in nearby fibroblasts. This normalization process is based on the assumption that the size of fibroblast centrosomes is consistent between the individual animals; therefore, it allows valid comparisons of centrosome size among different tissues in separate animals immunolabeled at various times, and among images captured in separate microscopy sessions. Centrosome size per cell was calculated as the combined region of all
-tubulinlabeled areas in the image divided by the total number of cells present. Centrosomes in normal tissues are an order of magnitude smaller than nuclei; therefore, this calculation returns a value of >1 because sections through cells pass through the centrosomes less frequently than sections pass through the cell nucleus. In the average cell, the centrosome will appear in only 1/4 of the sections, whereas the nucleus, on average, will appear in essentially all sections.
Statistical analyses. One-way ANOVA with Dunn or Tukey post hoc tests were used for statistical evaluation of the data presented, with the exception of the Aurora A kinase activity and the centrosome size and number that were analyzed using t test. Values were expressed as the mean ± SE. Statistical significance was assumed when P < 0.05 were obtained.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Aurora A activity and mRNA levels in E2-induced tumors. Additionally, the increased overexpression of Aurora A led to a concomitant 2.6-fold increase in its activity as detected using a synthetic construct kemptide as a substrate (Fig. 2A ). Additionally, Aurora A mRNA also showed a significant 6.0-fold increase in primary tumors in the kidney compared with age-matched cholesterol-treated control kidneys (Fig. 2B).
|
|
-tubulin and centrin. Both centrosome proteins consistently exhibited the highest level of expression in fraction 9, whereas their expression in other fractions was variable and in reduced amounts. Notably, Aurora A expression was expressed exclusively in fraction 9, indicating that this mitotic kinase was associated solely with the amplified tumor centrosome fraction. On the other hand, Aurora B expression was distributed at least throughout fractions 6 to 10 (data not shown), as expected of a passenger protein kinase.
|
-tubulin was confined to the pair of centrioles apical to the nucleus. Similarly, cholesterol-treated age-matched kidney samples showed comparable levels and location of
-tubulin immunostaining (data not shown). When 3-month E2-induced tumorous foci were compared with age-matched untreated control kidneys, a significant 1.8-fold increase in centrosome number was observed (Fig. 6
). A further significant increase in centrosome number (2.8-fold) was detected after 4 months of E2 treatment. Well-established tumor foci also exhibited a 1.8-fold increase in centrosome number per cell. When total centrosome area per cell was determined, 2.6-, 5.4-, and 2.5-fold increases were found in 3- and 4-month early tumorous foci, and in large tumor foci after 8 months of E2-treatment, respectively (Fig. 6). An increase in the number and total volume of centrosomes was indicative of centrosome amplification.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, and the neoplastic progression occurs in the absence of any discernible histopathologic stages (8). This E-ER
mediated process is completely prevented by concomitant administration of either tamoxifen citrate, progesterone, or androgen competing with ER
or respective hormone binding to their specific receptors (26, 30, 31). These findings strongly indicate that tumorigenesis is mediated by an ER
-mediated process consistent with a uterine-like tissue behavior because progesterone opposes the action of estrogen in the endometrium. The detection of high aneuploid frequencies, employing cytogenetic methodologies, nuclear image cytometry, G-banding karyotyping, comparative genomic hybridization, and fluorescence in situ hybridization in early tumorous lesions and in large, well-established tumors (8, 11, 13) have clearly established that chromosomal instability and aneuploidy are early events in solely E2-induced tumors. Moreover, non-random or consistent whole chromosome gains and losses have been detected in primary tumors with a frequency of 50% to 88%, depending on the specific chromosome of all tumors examined (11). Interestingly, similar high aneuploid frequencies have been detected in E2-induced ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and primary breast tumors in female ACI rats, and in E2 plus androgen-induced primary tumors in male Noble rats (32). Taken together, these findings indicate that these molecular alterations represent a common early pathway in E2-driven oncogenic processes.
Persistent overexpression of mitotic kinases, notably Aurora A and B, has been associated with centrosome amplification, which in turn, is believed to elicit chromosomal instability and aneuploidy; key molecular changes leading to tumor formation (1417). Nevertheless, no definitive evidence has yet shown that these events are in fact causally related. Persistent Aurora A and B overexpression in concert with centrosome amplification in early tumorous foci and in primary tumors elicited by E2, however, is consistent with previous findings that these molecular events invariably occur together (21, 33). The early detection of Aurora A and B overexpression and centrosome amplification in 3-month tumorous foci, as reported herein, provides additional evidence that these mitotic kinases may be involved in the incipient events leading to tumor development. The discovery that Aurora A and B are persistently overexpressed in early tumorous foci in the kidney and Aurora A in dysplasias and DCIS in female ACI rats (34), both induced by E2, suggest that these kinases are under direct or indirect estrogen control. This notion is now supported by our finding that upon estrogen withdrawal or the coadministration of tamoxifen citrate in the presence of E2, a marked decline in Aurora A expression was found in tumors residing in the kidney compared with corresponding tumors maintained only on E2.
Not unexpectedly, the relative brief period of E2 withdrawal, or E2 + tamoxifen citrate treatment, did not result in a decrease in centrosome amplification in tumors in the kidney, even though Aurora A expression declined significantly. Centrosomes are complex structures, and the
-tubulin and centrin present in centrosomes are relatively stable proteins. Therefore, the tumor cells likely require many cell cycles in order to deplete these proteins from the centrosome structure. Moreover, when E2 is withdrawn or blocked, the rate of cell proliferation will eventually decrease, reducing the opportunity for changes in the contribution of these centrosome proteins to centrosome size and number.
Because estrogens are the major causative agent in human sporadic breast cancer, it is not surprising that our findings in two E2-induced tumor rodent models replicate the high frequencies of Aurora A overexpression (
94%) and amplified centrosomes (
80%) reported in both human premalignant DCIS lesions and primary invasive ductal breast cancer (22, 28, 35). The precise relationship between the sustained overexpression of Aurora A and B and the generation of amplified centrosomes leading to multipolar spindle formation and unequal segregation of chromosomes both in E2-induced early tumorous focal lesions in male Syrian hamster kidneys and in dysplasias/DCIS in female ACI rats remains to be resolved. Combined Aurora A and B phosphorylate more than 20 centrosomal and mitotic protein substrates (21), and the phosphorylation of individual or cassettes of their substrates might affect the deregulation of the centrosome cycle, particularly centrosome duplication.
In summary, we have shown that Aurora A overexpression and activity and Aurora B overexpression are linked to centrosome amplification, leading to chromosome instability, aneuploidy, and tumor development. These critical events occur during incipient stages of E2-induced oncogenesis and indicate a possible common mechanism whereby estrogens elicit tumor development in target tissues.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 9/ 7/06. Revised 1/19/07. Accepted 1/25/07.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. You, Q. Li, C. Wu, J. Kim, M. Ottinger, and P. M. Howley Regulation of Aurora B Expression by the Bromodomain Protein Brd4 Mol. Cell. Biol., September 15, 2009; 29(18): 5094 - 5103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Adler, K. Muller, E. Rached, W. Dekant, and A. Mally Modulation of key regulators of mitosis linked to chromosomal instability is an early event in ochratoxin A carcinogenicity Carcinogenesis, April 1, 2009; 30(4): 711 - 719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. H. Lee, Y. Zhu, K. M Govindasamy, and G. Gopalan Downregulation of Aurora-A overrides estrogen-mediated growth and chemoresistance in breast cancer cells Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2008; 15(3): 765 - 775. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Gautschi, J. Heighway, P. C. Mack, P. R. Purnell, P. N. Lara Jr., and D. R. Gandara Aurora Kinases as Anticancer Drug Targets Clin. Cancer Res., March 15, 2008; 14(6): 1639 - 1648. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X.-F. Huang, S.-K. Luo, J. Xu, J. Li, D.-R. Xu, L.-H. Wang, M. Yan, X.-R. Wang, X.-B. Wan, F.-M. Zheng, et al. Aurora kinase inhibitory VX-680 increases Bax/Bcl-2 ratio and induces apoptosis in Aurora-A-high acute myeloid leukemia Blood, March 1, 2008; 111(5): 2854 - 2865. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Cheng, Z. Shen, J. Yang, S.-H. Lu, and Y. Cui ECRG2 Disruption Leads to Centrosome Amplification and Spindle Checkpoint Defects Contributing Chromosome Instability J. Biol. Chem., February 29, 2008; 283(9): 5888 - 5898. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Wang, L. Liu, and R. D. Brinton Estradiol-17 -Induced Human Neural Progenitor Cell Proliferation Is Mediated by an Estrogen Receptor -Phosphorylated Extracellularly Regulated Kinase Pathway Endocrinology, January 1, 2008; 149(1): 208 - 218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |