| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Molecular Biology, Pathobiology, and Genetics |
Departments of 1 Pathology and 2 Biochemistry, S.H. Ho Foundation Research Laboratories and Hong Kong Jockey Club Clinical Research Centre, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
Requests for reprints: Yick-Pang Ching, Department of Pathology, The University of Hong Kong, Room L7-04, Laboratory Block, Faculty of Medicine Building, Pokfulam, Hong Kong. Phone: 852-2819-9656; Fax: 852-2819-5375; E-mail: ypching{at}hkucc.hku.hk or Irene Oi-Lin Ng, Department of Pathology, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Room 127B, University Pathology Building, Pokfulam, Hong Kong. Phone: 852-2855-3967; Fax: 852-2872-5197; E-mail iolng{at}hku.hk.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
P21-activated protein kinase 1 (Pak1) is a main downstream effector of small Rho GTPases Rac1 and Cdc42 and plays an important role in the regulation of cell morphogenesis, motility, survival, mitosis, and angiogenesis (2, 3). Amplification of Pak1 has been found in several human cancers, including colorectal and breast cancer (4, 5). In addition, emerging evidence has suggested that Pak1 is required for progression and metastasis of breast cancer by mediating growth factor-induced motility and invasiveness (6, 7). More recently, Pak1 expression has been shown to significantly increase in colorectal cancer metastasis to lymph nodes (5). These results suggest that Pak1 is potentially important in carcinogenesis and cancer metastasis.
The molecular mechanism by which Pak1 contributes to carcinogenesis is unclear. Pak1 is believed to be involved in several cell signaling pathways. For instance, activation of Pak1 and its downstream signaling pathways, such as mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK) and nuclear factor-
B (NF-
B), are believed to be important in carcinogenesis (8). Activation of Pak1 not only activates the NF-
B cell survival pathway but also inhibits apoptosis via phosphorylation of the proapoptotic protein Bad, thereby providing a growth advantage to tumor cells (9, 10). In addition, expression of dominant-inactive form of Pak1 in Rat1 fibroblasts can block Ras-induced cell transformation, indicating that Pak1 plays a role in cell transformation and Ras signaling (11). Furthermore, expression of dominant-active form of Pak1 in breast cancer cells induces the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor, suggesting that Pak1 is also involved in angiogenesis (12).
The role of Pak1 in hepatocarcinogenesis has never been explored. In this study, we sought to examine the expression of Pak1 in human HCCs and characterize its roles in HCC. Our data indicate that Pak1 expression was significantly up-regulated in human HCCs. This overexpression was associated with more aggressive tumor behavior. Pak1 also enhanced the motility of HCC cells as well as the phosphorylation of c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK) and paxillin. Our findings define a novel Pak1/JNK/paxillin pathway critically involved in the metastasis of HCC.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Plasmids. The Pak1 construct, pCMV6-Pak1, was a generous gift from Dr. Gary Bokoch (The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA). Plasmid pEGFP-Pak1 was constructed by subcloning a BamHI/EcoRI fragment containing full-length cDNA of Pak1 into pEGFP vector (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA) via the BglII/EcoRI sites. The Pak1 dominant-inactive mutant was constructed by mutating the lysine at residue 299 to arginine (pEGFP-Pak1 K299R) using the QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) as per protocol suggested by manufacturer. The mutagenic primer sequence was 5'-GTGGCCATTAGGCAGATGAATCTTC.
Tissue culture and stable clone selection. HepG2 (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA), H2M, and H2P cells (generous gifts from Dr. X.Y. Guan, Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong; ref. 13) were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (JRH Biosciences, Lenexa, KS) and 100 units each of penicillin and streptomycin. Cells were transfected with 3 µg DNA constructs using LipofectAMINE 2000 reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) as per protocols recommended by the manufacturer. For RNA interference (RNAi) of Pak1, 150 pmol each of Pak1 small interfering RNA (siPak1) and control siRNA (both from Cell Signalling Technology) and siPak1-2 (sense sequence 5'-CCUAAACCAUGGUUCUAAA; First Base Pte Ltd., Singapore) were used for each transfection using LipofectAMINE 2000 reagent. For constructing the stable transfectant, pEGFP and pEGFP-Pak1 wild-type (WT) were separately transfected into HepG2. Forty-eight hours after transfection, G418 at 0.8 mg/mL (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA) was added for the selection of stable clones.
Reverse transcription-PCR. Total RNA was extracted from tumors and their corresponding nontumorous liver samples from HCC patients using the Trizol reagent (Life Technologies, Inc., Grand Island, NY), and 2 µg each RNA sample was used to prepare cDNA. The semiquantitative PCR primer sequences for Pak1 were 5'-CGTGGCTACATCTCCCATTT (forward) and 5'-TCCCTCATGACCAGGATCTC (reverse). Quantitative real-time PCR was done using the Applied Biosystems Taqman system (Foster City, CA; Pak1 probe, 5'-AAAGAGCTGCTACAGCATCAATTCC). Cellular 18S mRNA was used as an internal control.
Confocal microscopy. Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min, washed, and permeabilized with 0.2% Triton in PBS for 15 min. Slides were stained for 10 min with TRITC-phalloidin (Invitrogen) at room temperature and immunofluorescence imaging was captured in a Zeiss LSM510 laser scanning confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss Microimaging Inc., Thornwood. NY).
Western blot analysis. Human tissue samples and HCC cells were harvested into radioimmunoprecipitation assay lysis buffer [50 mmol/L Tris-HCL (pH 7.4), 1% NP40, 0.25% sodium deoxycholate, 150 mmol/L NaCl, 1 mmol/L EDTA, 5 mmol/L sodium fluoride, 1 mmol/L DTT] with freshly added protease inhibitor cocktail (1 mmol/L phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 µg/mL leupeptin, 2 µg/mL aprotinin, and 2 µg/mL soybean trypsin inhibitor). The cell lysate was cleared by centrifugation at 4°C and the supernatant was stored in small aliquots at 80°C. Normally, 20 µg sample was loaded into each lane, separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, and probed with respective antibodies.
Transwell cell migration, wound healing, and proliferation assay. The methods for Transwell cell migration, wound healing, and proliferation assay were described previously (14). The best fit curve of growth doubling time for proliferation assay was calculated using GraphPad prism software (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA).
Cell spreading assay. Stably transfected cells (1 x 105) were seeded in triplicates onto a 12-well plate that had been coated with fibronectin (Calbiochem) at 10 µg/mL for 1 h at room temperature and washed with PBS. Cells were allowed to attach onto the plate. Unattached cells were washed away with PBS and attached cells were trypsinized and counted at different time intervals.
Immunohistochemistry. The method for immunohistochemical staining was described previously (15). Briefly, formalin-fixed paraffin sections were stained for Pak1 and phospho-paxillin (1:500 and 1:1,000 dilutions, respectively) using the streptavidin-biotin immunoperoxidase technique. Antigen retrieval was achieved by microwave treatment with citrate buffer at pH 6.0 at 95°C for 9 min. The immunohistochemical staining was scored in the following grades according to the percentage of positive hepatocytes: 0, <10% positive; 1, 10% to 30% positive; 2, 31% to 75% positive; and 3, >75% positive.
Clinical HCC samples and patients. Paired samples of primary HCCs and the corresponding nontumorous liver tissues from Chinese patients were collected at the time of surgical resection at The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital (Pokfulam, Hong Kong). All specimens were obtained immediately after surgical resection, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen, and kept at 70°C. The diagnosis of recurrence was based on typical imaging findings on computerized tomographic scan or arteriography, and if necessary, percutaneous fine-needle aspiration cytology. Disease-free survival was measured from the date of hepatic resection to the date when recurrent disease was diagnosed or, in the absence of detectable tumor, to the date of death or last follow-up. Overall survival was measured from the date of hepatic resection to the date of death or last follow-up.
Statistical analysis. Fisher's exact or
2 test was used for statistical analysis of categorical data, whereas independent t test was used for continuous data. Tests were considered significant when their P values were <0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
To further confirm the up-regulation and evaluate the localization of Pak1 in HCCs, immunohistochemical staining was done on 29 randomly selected HCC samples using the anti-Pak1 antibody and their immunoreactivity was scored. Positive staining was observed in both nontumorous hepatocytes and HCC cells. However, significantly stronger staining of Pak1 was observed in HCCs than in the nontumorous liver tissues (Fig. 1C). Interestingly, both membranous and cytoplasmic patterns of staining were observed in HCCs, whereas only membranous pattern of staining was observed in nontumorous hepatocytes (Fig. 1C). Taken together, these data confirm that Pak1 was overexpressed in human HCCs.
Clinicopathologic correlation of Pak1 overexpression. To understand the clinicopathologic significance of Pak1, we correlated the overexpression of Pak1 mRNA with the clinicopathologic features of the patients. Pak1 mRNA overexpression was significantly associated with the presence of venous invasion (P = 0.022), poorer cellular differentiation by Edmondson's grading (P < 0.001; ref. 16), more advanced tumor stages (P = 0.003), and shorter disease-free survival (P = 0.022; Table 1 ).
|
|
To address the mechanism by which Pak1 enhanced migration, we did the cell spreading assay. Cells were allowed to spread onto the fibronectin-coated plate and the number of cells attached against time was determined. We found that the two stable clones required significantly longer time for attachment compared with the EGFP control cells (Fig. 2C).
Expression of Pak1 down-regulated stress fiber formation. We tested if Pak1 regulated the actin polymerization to increase the migration rates. The WT-5 stable clone was serum starved and followed by treatment with lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) to stimulate the formation of stress fibers and focal adhesion complexes. As revealed by phalloidin staining, much fewer stress fibers were formed in the WT-5 cells compared with the control (Fig. 2D). The focal adhesion complex was fewer, but larger, in the LPA-stimulated WT-5 stable clone than the control. These results suggest that Pak1 enhances migration by down-regulating stress fiber and focal adhesion complex formation.
Knockdown of endogenous Pak1 by siRNA reduced HCC cell migration. To confirm the role of Pak1 on cell migration, we used RNAi to specifically knockdown endogenous Pak1 in HCC cells. The specific knockdown of endogenous Pak1 protein using siRNA in HepG2 cells was confirmed with immunoblotting (Fig. 3A
). In Transwell assay, HepG2 cells transfected with Pak1 siRNA migrated much more slowly (
50%) than those treated with control siRNA, suggesting that loss of Pak1 retarded the migration of HCC cells (Fig. 3A). To further examine if the Pak1 kinase activity was essential for the HCC cell migration, the WT and a dominant-inactive form of Pak1 (Pak1 K299R) were transfected into HepG2 cell for Transwell assay. As compared with the GFP control, the WT form of Pak1 promoted the migration of HepG2 cells, whereas the dominant-inactive form inhibited their migration (Fig. 3B).
|
Overexpression of Pak1 had no effect on the proliferation rate of HCC cells. Overexpression of Pak1 has been reported to increase cell proliferation in breast cancer by up-regulating the expression of cyclin D1 (17). However, the role of Pak1 in the progression of HCC remained elusive. To address if overexpression of Pak1 promoted cell growth, cell proliferation assay was done. The effect of Pak1 on HCC cell proliferation was mild, and the doubling time of Pak1 stable cell lines, WT-5 and WT-7, (
26 h) was only slightly shorter than that of the EGFP control (
30 h; Fig. 4
). In addition, we found no significant difference of cyclin D1 expression between the control and Pak1-overexpressing HCC cell lines (Fig. 4).
|
|
Phosphorylation of paxillin by JNK is important for HCC cell migration. Recently, Huang et al. (18) reported that direct phosphorylation of paxillin at Ser178 by JNK played an important role in the regulation of rat tumor epithelial cells and fish keratocyte movement. In light of this, we hypothesized that overexpression of Pak1 might regulate HCC migration via JNK phosphorylation of paxillin. To test this hypothesis, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) was used to activate endogenous Pak1 in H2M cells. HGF was chosen because of its potent effect on hepatocyte migration. Pak1 phosphorylation was increased with increasing dosage of HGF in H2M cells, and this was similar for the phosphorylation of JNK and paxillin at S178 (Fig. 6A ), suggesting that they may regulate in a similar pathway.
|
To confirm the role of S178 paxillin phosphorylation in HCC, we examine our human HCCs with immunohistochemical staining. Our result showed that the expression of S178 paxillin in Pak1-overexpressing human HCCs was substantially increased in the tumor cells, localizing to the nuclei (Fig. 6C). Taken together, these findings suggest a novel pathway in which Pak1 induces phosphorylation of JNK, which in turn phosphorylates paxillin at S178, thus promoting HCC cell migration.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
75%) and significantly overexpressed in human HCCs. Importantly, Pak1 overexpression significantly correlated with more aggressive tumor behavior in terms of venous invasion, poorer cellular differentiation, more advanced tumor stage, and shorter disease-free survival. These data have established that up-regulation of Pak1 occurs in HCCs and is associated with a metastatic phenotype. We have shown that Pak1 was overexpressed at both mRNA and protein levels in our human HCC samples. The mechanism of this overexpression is currently unclear, but it has been reported that chromosome region 11q13-14, which contains the Pak1 gene, is frequently amplified in HCCs (19). The possibility that the enhanced Pak1 expression is due to aberration in promoter activity and/or protein turnover cannot be completely ruled out. In this study, we have documented that not only was the Pak1 overexpressed, the Pak1 activity was also increased in HCCs, as revealed by the phosphospecific antibody that recognizes the activated form of Pak1.
Several lines of evidence here have implicated that overexpression and activation of Pak1 is causally associated with HCC metastasis through the stimulation of cell mobility. First, we have shown that overexpression of Pak1 in human HCCs was associated with a more metastatic phenotype and a shorter disease-free survival. Second, the expression of Pak1 at both mRNA and protein levels was significantly higher in H2M cells derived from a metastatic HCC than in H2P cells derived from the corresponding primary human HCC. Third, HCC cell lines stably expressing Pak1 had higher migration rate, whereas those with knockdown of endogenous Pak1 using siRNA had significantly reduced cell migration rates.
To investigate the underlying mechanism, we have shown that the ability of HCC cells to form stress fibers was attenuated by overexpression of Pak1. Furthermore, inhibition of JNK abolished Pak1-induced cell migration in HCC cells. Recently, it has been shown that phosphorylation of paxillin at serine residue 178 by JNK promotes cell migration (18). In this study, we showed that JNK was phosphorylated and activated in both clinical samples and HCC cell lines stably expressing Pak1. Moreover, we showed that paxillin phosphorylation at S178 by JNK was important for Pak1-mediated migration of HCC cells. Consistent with this notion, we also noticed that the basal phosphorylation level of S178 paxillin in H2M cells was high (Fig. 6B, lanes 1 and 2) and correlated with the highly metastatic property of the cells. With immunohistochemical staining, there was a substantial increase in the S178-phosphorylated paxillin in Pak1-overexpressing human HCCs. Although paxillin is phosphorylated by other kinases [e.g., focal adhesion kinase (20) and ERK (21)], JNK is the only kinase having been reported to phosphorylate paxillin at S178. The possibility that paxillin S178 is the target of other kinases is currently under investigation, but our data have established the first evidence that paxillin S178 phosphorylation is associated with metastasis of HCC.
It has been reported that the main upstream regulators of Pak1 (i.e., Rac1 and Cdc42) are up-regulated in breast cancer (22). To address the issue of Pak1 activation in HCCs, we have examined the expression of Rac1 and Cdc42 in clinical samples but observed no significant difference of these regulators at protein level. Although the best evidence is to examine the activity state of these small G-proteins by GTP loading activity pull-down assay, it is still a technical challenge to use clinical samples for this assay. Pak1 has been reported to be activated via several other Cdc42/Rac1independent mechanisms, such as interaction with lipid/sphingosine (23), filamin A (24), and adaptor protein Nck (25) and activation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt (26) and heterotrimeric G-protein (27). Particularly, we have observed that, with immunohistochemical analysis, some of the Pak1-overexpressing human HCCs displayed intense membranous staining, implying that Pak1 can be targeted to plasma membrane for activation in HCC. Consistent with this finding, we observed that the overexpressed EGFP-Pak1 protein in Pak1-stable cell line also localized mainly in cytoplasm and plasma membrane, as different from the EGFP control, in which GFP was present in both nucleus and cytoplasm (Supplementary Fig. S2). Thus, we would like to propose that the cytoplasmic accumulation of Pak1 due to gene overexpression may enhance the translocation of Pak1 onto the plasma membrane, leading to the activation of Pak1 as well as the increase in cell migration.
In this study, we observed little difference in the cell proliferation rates between cells stably expressing Pak1 and the parental cells. Although Pak1 has been shown to promote proliferation of breast cancer cells (17), it is possible that Pak1 will have different roles in the development of HCC. In fact, consistent with our in vitro finding in HCC cell lines, Pak1 overexpression was not associated with tumor size in our human HCCs. Thus far, our findings implicate that the major role of Pak1 in HCC is to promote cell migration.
In conclusion, we have shown that Pak1 is overexpressed in human HCCs and HCC cell lines and that Pak1 overexpression plays an important role in cancer metastasis. The mechanism by which Pak1 induces cancer metastasis may involve activation of JNK and phosphorylation of paxillin.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
We thank Dr. Gary Bokoch for providing the Pak1 plasmids, Dr. Chun-Ming Wong for assistance in statistical analysis of data, and Abel Chun for critical reading of the manuscript.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received 1/30/06. Revised 2/26/07. Accepted 2/ 9/07.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
q14 in human breast carcinoma. Cytogenet Cell Genet 1997;79:12531.[Medline]
B activity by multiple signaling pathways requires PAK1. J Biol Chem 2000;275:196939.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Smadja-Lamere, M.-C. Boulanger, C. Champagne, P. E. Branton, and J. N. Lavoie JNK-mediated Phosphorylation of Paxillin in Adhesion Assembly and Tension-induced Cell Death by the Adenovirus Death Factor E4orf4 J. Biol. Chem., December 5, 2008; 283(49): 34352 - 34364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Smith, Z. M. Jaffer, J. Chernoff, and A. J. Ridley PAK1-mediated activation of ERK1/2 regulates lamellipodial dynamics J. Cell Sci., November 15, 2008; 121(22): 3729 - 3736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Parsons and J. C. Adams Rac regulates the interaction of fascin with protein kinase C in cell migration J. Cell Sci., September 1, 2008; 121(17): 2805 - 2813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |