| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Molecular Biology, Pathobiology, and Genetics |
in Skin Inflammation Induced by Tumor-Promoting Phorbol EsterDivision of Molecular Biology, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Chuo-ku, Kobe, Japan
Requests for reprints: Tohru Kataoka, Division of Molecular Biology, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe 650-0017, Japan. Phone: 81-78-382-5380; Fax: 81-78-382-5399; E-mail: kataoka{at}people.kobe-u.ac.jp.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(PLC
–/– mice) exhibited marked resistance to tumor formation in the two-stage skin carcinogenesis. PLC
–/– mice also failed to exhibit basal layer cell proliferation and epidermal hyperplasia induced by TPA, suggesting a role of PLC
in tumor promotion. Here, we show that PLC
–/– mice exhibit resistance to TPA-induced skin inflammation as assessed by reduction in edema, granulocyte infiltration, and expression of a proinflammatory cytokine, interleukin-1
(IL-1
). On the other hand, the proliferative potentials of keratinocytes or dermal fibroblasts in culture remain unaffected by the PLC
background, suggesting that the PLC
's role in tumor promotion may be ascribed to augmentation of inflammatory responses. In dermal fibroblast primary culture, TPA can induce activation of the PLC
lipase activity, which leads to the induction of IL-1
expression. Experiments using small interfering RNA–mediated knockdown indicate that this activation is mediated by Rap1, which is activated by a TPA-responsive guanine nucleotide exchange factor RasGRP3. Moreover, TPA-induced activation of Rap1 and PLC
is inhibited by a PKC inhibitor GF109203X, indicating a crucial role of PKC in signaling from TPA to PLC
. These results imply that two TPA targets, RasGRP3 and PKC, are involved in TPA-induced inflammation through PLC
activation, leading to tumor promotion. [Cancer Res 2008;68(1):64–72] | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
,
,
,
, and
) based upon the similarities in their structures and regulatory mechanisms (1, 2).
We and others identified PLC
as an effector of Ras family small GTPases (Ras, Rap1, and Rap2), which bind directly to its Ras-associating domain (3–6). Subsequent studies have shown that PLC
is also activated by small GTPase RhoA and heterotrimeric G proteins G
12 and Gβ1
2 (6). These multiple regulatory mechanisms enable PLC
to mediate signals from a wide variety of cell surface receptors, including receptor tyrosine kinases (7) and G protein–coupled receptors (8). In addition, PLC
functions as a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) for Rap1 by its CDC25 homology domain (9). The physiologic role of PLC
has been intensively studied using various animals carrying artificial or spontaneous mutations in its chromosomal gene. Positional cloning of the gene responsible for a nephrotic syndrome identified mutations in the human PLC
gene PLCE1 (10). Knockdown of the PLC
orthologue in the zebrafish resulted in loss of the filtration barrier in the glomerular podocytes resembling the human symptom (10). Mice homozygous for the functionally inactivated PLC
allele (PLC
–/– mice) exhibited semilunar valvulogenesis defect, leading to cardiac dilation (11), and mice with total disruption of the PLC
gene developed cardiac hypertrophy under an extreme cardiac stress (12). Targeted inactivation of the PLC
orthologue in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans resulted in delayed dilation of the spermatheca-uterine valve, leading to defective ovulation (13).
We showed that PLC
–/– mice exhibited marked resistance to tumor formation in the two-stage skin chemical carcinogenesis protocol using 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA) as an initiator and a phorbol ester, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA), as a promoter (14). PLC
–/– mice also failed to exhibit basal layer cell proliferation and epidermal hyperplasia induced by TPA, suggesting a role of PLC
in tumor promotion. As TPA is a molecular mimic of DAG, a variety of DAG target proteins carrying the C1 domains are potential effectors for the TPA-dependent tumor promotion, such as conventional PKCs, novel PKCs, protein kinase D,
and β chimaerins, Munc13-1
4, diacylglycerol kinases β and
, and RasGRP1
4 (15). RasGRPs, also called CalDAG-GEFs, are specific GEFs for Ras family small GTPases (16). The association with DAG/TPA is sufficient for activation of chimaerins, whereas phosphorylation by PKC is also required for activation of RasGRP3 (15). Although PKC isozymes have been most intensively investigated, their role in de novo carcinogenesis, including tumor promotion, remains controversial. For instance, overexpression of PKCβII in the colon resulted in hyperproliferation and increased sensitivity to carcinogen-induced cancer (17). In contrast, transgenic overexpression of
or
isozyme of PKC exhibited inhibitory effects on tumor promotion with TPA (18, 19), and targeted disruption of the PKC
or PKC
gene resulted in increased tumor formation (20–22), indicating that these isozymes may function as tumor suppressors. Such observations led to the reassessment of the role of PKCs and suggested the involvement of non-PKC molecules in tumor promotion (15).
The causal relationship between tumor promotion and inflammation, an old hypothesis, has gained substantial experimental supports from recent studies (23). However, molecular and cellular mechanisms mediating this relationship remain unsolved. In this study, we show that PLC
plays a crucial role in TPA-induced inflammation, which seems to account for its role in TPA-dependent tumor promotion. PLC
is activated by TPA in dermal fibroblasts, which is mediated by RasGRP3-dependent activation of Rap1. Interestingly, PKC activation, too, is required for this Rap1 activation, the mechanism of which will be discussed.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
allele (PLC
–), created by in-frame deletion of an exon coding for the catalytic X domain, were generated as described previously (11, 14). They were backcrossed to C57BL/6 strain eight times. PLC
+/+ and PLC
–/– littermates were produced by cross-breeding of PLC
+/– mice and were used for the experiments. All the animals were maintained at the animal facilities of Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine. ICR mice were purchased from Japan SLC, Inc. The use and care of the animals were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Committee of Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine.
Antibodies and chemicals. Primary antibodies used here were antimouse keratin 1 (K1; Covance), antimouse keratin 14 (K14; Covance), anti-Rap1 (sc-65; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), anti-actin (sc-8432; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), anti-mouse Gr-1 (MAB1037; R&D Systems, Inc.), anti–mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK; 9102; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), anti–phosphorylated MAPK (9106; Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.), anti–Pan-Ras (OP21; Calbiochem), and antivimentin (ab7783; Abcom). Anti-PLC
antibody raised against the C terminus of mouse PLC
was described (24). Secondary antibodies conjugated with horseradish peroxidase were purchased from GE Healthcare. Fluorescently active secondary antibodies labeled with Alexa Fluor 488 or Alexa Fluor 546 were purchased from Invitrogen. A PLC inhibitor, U73122, and a PKC inhibitor, GF109203X, were purchased from Calbiochem.
Preparation and culture of skin keratinocytes and fibroblasts. Epidermal keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts were isolated from the dorsal skin of 1-day-old to 3-day-old newborn mice and cultured as described previously (25). The purity of the cells was over 99% as assessed by immunostaining with anti-K14 and anti-vimentin antibodies for keratinocytes and fibroblasts, respectively. For organotypic culture of keratinocytes, dermal fibroblasts isolated from wild-type mice were used for reconstitution of the dermal equivalent as described (25).
Preparation of splenic B lymphocytes and non–B lymphocytes and peritoneal macrophages. Splenic B lymphocytes and non–B lymphocytes were prepared as described (26). Thioglycollate-elicited peritoneal macrophages were prepared according to the standard procedure. Briefly, mice were i.p. injected with 3 mL of sterile 4% thioglycollate (Sigma). Four days later, the peritoneal lavage was collected and, after removal of fibroblasts through adherence onto glass plates, used as a macrophage preparation.
Assessment of TPA-induced skin responses. The backside of the ears of 8-week-old to 12-week-old male mice was topically treated with 50 µL of 50 µg/mL TPA (P-8139; Sigma) dissolved in acetone. Ear thickness was measured with calipers, and ear swelling was calculated as (thickness at each time point) – (thickness at 0 h). Histologic analysis with H&E staining and immunohistochemical analysis of the skin sections were carried out essentially as described (11, 14).
Reverse transcription–PCR analysis. Reverse transcription–PCR (RT-PCR) was performed as described previously (11, 24). The sequences of the primers used for PCR are listed in Supplementary Table S1.
Western blot analysis. Cells were solubilized in lysis buffer [50 mmol/L Tris-Cl (pH 7.5), 250 mmol/L NaCl, 1 mmol/L EDTA, 0.5% (v/v) Triton X-100, 1 mmol/L phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), 10 mmol/L NaF, 1 mmol/L Na3VO4, 20 mmol/L β-glycerophosphate, 1 µmol/L leupeptin]. SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting were performed as described previously (24).
Measurements of Ras-GTP and Rap1-GTP. The cellular levels of Ras-GTP and Rap1-GTP were determined by pull-down assays using glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusions of Raf-1 Ras-binding domain (GST–Raf-1–RBD) and RalGDS Ras-interacting domain (GST-RalGDS-RID), respectively (27). After serum-starving in 0.1% FCS overnight, cells were stimulated with TPA or vehicle for 5 min and lysed in magnesium lysis buffer [50 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mmol/L NaCl, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 20 mmol/L MgCl2, 1 µmol/L leupeptin, 1 mmol/L PMSF], and soluble fractions were collected by centrifugation. Protein concentrations were determined by Bradford method, and 0.7 and 1 mg of the lysate protein were used for pull-down of Ras-GTP and Rap1-GTP, respectively, which were detected by Western blotting with anti–Pan-Ras and anti-Rap1 antibodies, respectively.
Measurement of cytosolic free calcium concentration. Cytosolic free calcium concentration was monitored in cells loaded with acetoxymethyl ester form of Fura-2 (Fura-2 AM; ref. 28). Dermal fibroblasts in culture were collected by trypsinization and washed once with DMEM containing 10% FCS and once with solution A [5.4 mmol/L KCl, 0.3 mmol/L Na2HPO4, 0.4 mmol/L KH2PO4, 4.2 mmol/L NaHCO3, 1.3 mmol/L CaCl2, 0.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.6 mmol/L MgSO4, 1.4 mmol/L NaCl, 5.6 mmol/L D-glucose, 10 mmol/L HEPES (pH 7.4), 200 µmol/L sulfinpyrazone (S-9509; Sigma)]. Cells were incubated for 30 min at 37°C in solution A containing 5 µmol/L Fura-2 AM (Nacalai Tesque, Inc.) and 0.02% (v/v) Plaronic F27 (P-3000MP; Molecular Probes). After washing twice with solution A, the cells were suspended at 7.5 x 105 cells/mL in solution A containing 0.1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin and subjected to measurement of the emission at 510 nm with the excitation at 340/380 nm using F-4500 fluorometer (Hitachi). Fura-2 loading was confirmed by subsequent treatment of the cells with 10 µmol/L ionomycin followed with 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100. Results are expressed as relative concentrations of cytosolic free calcium calculated as described (29).
Gene silencing by small interfering RNA. Dermal fibroblasts (4 x 106 cells) suspended in 1 mL of OptiMEM (Invitrogen) were transfected with 600 nmol/L Stealth small interfering RNAs (siRNA; Invitrogen) using GenePulser (Bio-Rad) at 400 µF, 380 V. After electroporation, cells were cultured in DMEM containing 10% FCS for 48 h and subjected to further experiments. The identification numbers of the Stealth siRNAs used were MSS216065 and MSS216067 for RasGRP3 (abbreviated as grp65 and grp67, respectively), MSS201244, and MSS201242 for Rap1A (a44 and a42, respectively), and MSS210941 and MSS210942 for Rap1B (b41 and b42, respectively). Stealth RNA interference negative control kit with Low GC or Med GC (Invitrogen) was used as negative control.
Statistical analysis. Values are expressed as the averages ± SDs. The unpaired Student's t test was performed for determination of P values.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
background. Our previous observation on the crucial roles of PLC
in two-stage skin carcinogenesis and TPA-induced epidermal hyperplasia prompted us to examine its role in proliferation of skin cells in culture. We first analyzed the expression levels of PLC
in primary cultured epidermal keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts. The keratinocytes in culture were positive for K14 and represented the proliferative populations residing in the basal cell layer of the epidermis. RT-PCR analysis showed that PLC
is expressed much more abundantly in fibroblasts than in keratinocytes (Fig. 1A
). Western blot analysis using anti-PLC
antibody detected two immunoreactive bands, which presumably corresponded to the splicing variants PLC
1a and PLC
1b (12), and showed more abundant expression in fibroblasts (Fig. 1A). These data are consistent with our previous immunohistochemical observation that PLC
is expressed more weakly in K14-positive proliferative keratinocytes than in K1-positive differentiating keratinocytes (ref. 14; also see Supplementary Fig. S1A). We next evaluated the proliferative potential of keratinocytes and fibroblasts established from PLC
+/+ and PLC
–/– mice. We used the organotypic culture system, in which keratinocytes were seeded onto the dermal equivalent consisting of collagen fibers and dermal fibroblasts isolated from wild-type mice and induced to differentiate by air exposure and raise of calcium concentration in the culture medium (25). Essentially, no difference was observed in their proliferation, as indicated by the number of layers negative for K1, as well as in their differentiation, as estimated from the number of cells positive for K1 (Fig. 1B). Likewise, growth rate of dermal fibroblasts cultured in the presence of 10% FCS was not affected by the PLC
background (Fig. 1C). Furthermore, neither MAPK activation by TPA and epidermal growth factor (EGF; Fig. 1D, top) nor c-fos induction by TPA (Fig. 1D, bottom) was altered in dermal fibroblasts depending on the PLC
background, suggesting that PLC
did not affect these growth-promoting signaling pathways. Thus, PLC
did not seem to directly affect the proliferation of epidermal keratinocytes or dermal fibroblasts per se.
|
–/– skin. TPA treatment is known to induce inflammation in the skin, and a critical role of inflammation in tumor promotion has been widely acknowledged (23). During the chemical carcinogenesis experiments, we had noticed that TPA-induced edema in the dorsal skin, which seemed several hours after application, was considerably weaker in PLC
–/– mice compared with PLC
+/+ mice (data not shown). Here, we quantitatively examined the extent of the skin edema by treating the ears with TPA and measuring their thickness. Histologic analysis of the ears, prepared 10 h after TPA application, revealed marked spongiosis and extensive infiltration of leukocytes in the edematous dermis of PLC
+/+ mice. However, the extent of such changes was substantially reduced in PLC
–/– mice (Fig. 2A
). Examination of the time course of the ear swelling in PLC
+/+ mice showed that the swelling reached a peak around 9 to 12 h after TPA application and started partial resolution thereafter (Fig. 2B). In contrast, the swelling in PLC
–/– mice showed a plateau with a moderate level around 9 to 24 h, suggesting that the early peak phase of the edema, observed in PLC
+/+, was markedly attenuated (Fig. 2B). Calculation of the number of infiltrated granulocytes in the ear sections 10 h after TPA application indicated that TPA-induced infiltration of inflammatory leukocytes was significantly reduced in PLC
–/– mice compared with PLC
+/+ mice (Fig. 2C). These results indicated that TPA-induced inflammation was attenuated in PLC
–/– mice, suggesting the crucial role of PLC
in augmentation of inflammatory responses.
|
in TPA-induced expression of proinflammatory molecules. Attenuated inflammation in PLC
–/– mice prompted us to examine the expression of proinflammatory molecules at the early stage of TPA treatment. We analyzed the expression levels of representative proinflammatory molecules on the ear at 3 and 6 h after TPA application by semiquantitative RT-PCR (Fig. 3A
). We found that TPA-induced up-regulation of interleukin-1
(IL-1
) mRNA observed in PLC
+/+ mice was substantially attenuated in PLC
–/– mice. IL-1
is a member of the IL-1 family cytokines having pleiotropic functions, such as control of immune responses and inflammatory processes (30). On the other hand, TPA-induced up-regulation of mRNAs coding for the other molecules, including cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) and tumor necrosis factor-
(TNF-
), which are implicated in tumor promotion and inflammation (31, 32), was unaffected by the PLC
background.
|
was not detected in infiltrating Gr-1–positive granolocytes, B lymphocyte and non–B lymphocyte populations, or thioglycollate-elicited macrophages (Supplementary Fig. S1). This result suggested that keratinocytes and/or dermal fibroblasts are responsible for the role of PLC
in TPA-induced inflammation and led us to examine whether TPA-induced IL-1
up-regulation is recapitulated in keratinocytes and/or dermal fibroblasts in culture (Fig. 3B and C). In dermal fibroblasts, IL-1
mRNA expression was induced at 2 h after TPA application, and this induction was significantly compromised in fibroblasts from PLC
–/– mice (Fig. 3B). Expression of other representative proinflammatory molecules was not significantly affected by the PLC
background, except for macrophage inflammatory protein 2 (MIP-2), whose induction by higher concentration of TPA seemed to be attenuated in PLC
–/– fibroblasts. In sharp contrast, the IL-1
mRNA level in keratinocytes was not altered by TPA or the PLC
background (Fig. 3C). These results suggested that dermal fibroblasts, but not epidermal keratinocytes, play a major role in TPA-induced and PLC
-dependent up-regulation of IL-1
observed in the whole ears.
TPA induces activation of PLC
through Rap1 activation in dermal fibroblasts. Cultured dermal fibroblasts were used to analyze the molecular mechanism of TPA-dependent activation of PLC
. We first set up a method whereby the PLC activity is measured by increase in the cytosolic free calcium concentration triggered by the PLC product IP3. TPA application induced rapid increase in cytosolic free calcium, and this increase was totally abolished by pretreatment with a broad spectrum PLC inhibitor U73122 (Fig. 4A
), indicating the complete dependency on PLC activity. When TPA-induced calcium increase was compared, PLC
–/– fibroblasts exhibited considerable reduction compared with PLC
+/+ fibroblasts, indicating that a major part of the calcium increase was accounted for by the activation of PLC
(Fig. 4B). In contrast, ATP-dependent calcium increase, which is mediated by PLCβ, was not affected by the PLC
background, confirming that no difference existed in the loading efficiency of Fura-2 AM between PLC
+/+ and PLC
–/– cells (Fig. 4B). Thus, TPA-induced cytosolic free calcium increase could be used as a good measure of PLC
activation.
|
activation. To this end, the activation statuses of Ras and Rap1, two major regulators of PLC
, were examined in TPA-stimulated fibroblasts by using the pull-down assays. As shown in Fig. 5A
, TPA specifically induced activation of Rap1, but not Ras, regardless of the PLC
background. In contrast, EGF was capable of inducing activation of both Ras and Rap1. We next used siRNA-mediated knockdown of Rap1 expression to prove the role of Rap1 in TPA-dependent activation of PLC
. Because dermal fibroblasts expressed both Rap1A and Rap1B (Supplementary Fig. S2A), we transfected the cells with two different combinations of Rap1A-specific and Rap1B-specific siRNAs, both of which caused substantial reduction in the Rap1 expression (Supplementary Fig. S2B). As shown in Fig. 5B, transfection of the two siRNA combinations caused substantial reduction in TPA-induced cytosolic calcium increase and, hence, the activation of PLC
. The loading efficiency of Fura-2 AM was not affected by siRNA transfection, as no difference in the ATP-dependent calcium responses was shown. These results showed that Rap1 plays a crucial role in mediating the TPA-initiated signal, which leads to PLC
activation.
|
|
activation. This inhibition could not be overridden by stimulation with high doses of TPA. These results indicated that the TPA-initiated signal for Rap1 activation is mediated by both RasGRP3 and PKCs. | Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, a potent proinflammatory cytokine, are resistant to skin carcinogenesis by the DMBA/TPA protocol (32). Inhibition of inflammation by pharmacologic or genetic inactivation of COX-2 reduced tumor formation and malignant progression in mice carrying the mutated Apc gene (31). The importance of innate immunity was also shown by reduced tumor formation in the MyD88-deficient mice (35, 36). However, intracellular signaling mechanisms mediating this relationship remain largely unsolved.
In this study, we have shown that PLC
–/– mice exhibit substantially attenuated inflammatory responses to TPA treatment in the skin. Considering that the same mice exhibited marked resistance to tumor formation in the two-stage skin carcinogenesis and to TPA-induced basal layer cell proliferation and epidermal hyperplasia (14), our results suggest that PLC
may be involved in an intracellular signaling pathway linking tumor promotion and inflammation. Because cultured keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts, which are free from inflammatory cells, exhibited no difference in proliferation potential depending on the PLC
background, infiltrating inflammatory cells, whose number is reduced in PLC
–/– mice, are likely to be the main source of cytokines and growth factors, which are shown to be directly or indirectly, via stimulation of stromal cells, involved in the TPA-induced keratinocyte proliferation and possibly in tumor promotion (37). Thus, PLC
is likely to be involved in an initial phase of inflammation, i.e. recruitment of inflammatory leukocytes to the site of TPA administration. Because PLC
is found to be not expressed in leukocytes, including granulocytes, macrophages, and lymphocytes, keratinocytes and/or dermal fibroblasts are the possible sources of factors involved in this process. Search for such candidate proinflammatory molecules has identified IL-1
, whose induction by TPA is compromised in the skin of PLC
–/– mice. Experiments using cell culture have shown that dermal fibroblasts may be the main source of IL-1
induced by TPA in a PLC
-dependent manner. IL-1
, as well as IL-1β, is a member of the IL-1 cytokine family having pleiotropic functions (30). IL-1
exerts its activity by binding to its cell surface receptors belonging to the Toll-like receptor/IL-1 receptor superfamily (38). Binding of IL-1
to its receptors induces recruitment of MyD88, TRAF6, and protein kinases, including IRAK and IKK, leading to activation of the nuclear factor-
B (NF-
B)–dependent transcription of proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-6, KC, MIP-2, TNF
, and IL-1 (38). IL-1
also up-regulates expression of cell adhesion molecules, such as VCAM-1 and E-selectin on endothelial cells and ICAM-1 on mesenchymal cells, which are required for inflammatory responses, including transmigration of leukocytes to the sites of inflammation (30). Furthermore, it was reported that both epidermal hyperplasia induced by TPA and tumor promotion by repeated treatment with DMBA are suppressed by injection of anti–IL-1
antibody, indicating a crucial role of IL-1
(39, 40). Thus, it is likely that PLC
plays a crucial role in TPA-induced up-regulation of IL-1
in dermal fibroblasts, which initiates a series of inflammatory reactions in the skin. Also, our result has raised an interesting possibility that the microenvironment facilitating proliferation of the initiated cells may be provided by their surrounding cells through induction of inflammation mediated by PLC
. Our preliminary study showed that intestinal tumor formation in ApcMin mice was suppressed on the PLC
–/– background,1 suggesting rather universal role of PLC
in tumorigenesis.
We have revealed that Rap1 plays a crucial role in mediating TPA-dependent PLC
activation in dermal fibroblasts. Rap1 activation by TPA seems to be mediated by RasGRP3, which is a DAG/TPA-regulated Rap1-GEF expressed in dermal fibroblasts. Contrary to the previous reports that RasGRP3 is capable of activating Ras, as well as Rap1 (15, 16), we have failed to detect activation of Ras by TPA in our system; the reason for which is currently unknown. Furthermore, PKCs are also found to be required for TPA-dependent activation of Rap1 and PLC
. It has been reported that certain isozymes of PKCs phosphorylate RasGRP3 at its Thr133, and this phosphorylation is required for the GEF activity toward Ras (15, 16). Although a similar mechanism has not been proved with Rap1 as substrate, it may well be involved in regulation of the Rap1-GEF activity of RasGRP3. This is supported from a three-dimensional model structure of the GEF domain of RasGRP3, which implies that the phosphorylation of Thr133 plays an important role in a conformational change enhancing its guanine nucleotide exchange activity (34). Thus, we speculate that TPA may induce Rap1 activation in two ways: through direct activation of RasGRP3 and through direct activation of PKCs, which in turn phosphorylates and activates RasGRP3. We have observed that stimulation with a high dose (10 ng/mL) of TPA overrides the inhibitory effect of siRNAs against RasGRP3 but not of the PKC inhibitor on Rap1 activation. This phenomenon may be accounted for by postulating that RasGRP3 activity is fully dependent on PKC phosphorylation and that a high dose of TPA induces substantial activation of the residual RasGRP, which survived the siRNA action, through PKC activation so that the RasGRP3 activity reaches saturation. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that other PKC-regulated mechanisms of Rap1 activation may be involved in this process. Because the actual concentration of TPA reaching the dermis is totally unknown, physiologic implication of these results is very difficult. The transcription of the IL-1
gene is under very complex regulation involving not only NF-
B (41) and activator protein-1 (42) but also DNA methylation (43). Although NF-
B seems to be the most likely molecule involved in the TPA-induced and PLC
-mediated IL-1
expression, we have observed no alteration in the TPA-dependent induction of other NF-
B–regulated genes, such as IL-6, TNF-
(38), and COX-2 (44). Thus, the signaling mechanism downstream of PLC
leading to the IL-1
expression needs further clarification.
Our results raise the possibility that RasGRP3 may also play a crucial role in tumor promotion by TPA. However, the role of RasGRP3 in tumor promotion has not been studied, although mice whose RasGRP3 gene was disrupted were already generated (45). In dermal fibroblasts, we have detected
,
, and
isozymes of PKC by Western blotting.2 However,
and
isozymes are thought to be antitumorigenic (18–21), and the role of
isozyme in dermal fibroblasts has not been well documented. Further studies on the role of various PKC isozymes in Rap1-PLC
signaling will be required for elucidation of the molecular mechanism linking tumor promotion and inflammation by TPA.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
We thank Dr. Masahiro Oka for helpful discussions and Tadashi Murase for setting up the assay system for cytosolic calcium concentration.
| Footnotes |
|---|
S. Ikuta and H. Edamatsu contributed equally to this work.
1 M. Li, H. Edamatsu, and T. Kataoka, unpublished data. ![]()
2 S. Ikuta, H. Edamatsu, M. Li, L. Hu, and T. Kataoka, unpublished data. ![]()
Received 8/22/07. Revised 10/ 1/07. Accepted 11/ 6/07.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
: a novel Ras effector. EMBO J 2001;20:743–54.[CrossRef][Medline]
12 and stimulates the Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. J Biol Chem 2001;276:2758–65.
, through membrane targeting by Ras. J Biol Chem 2001;276:2752–7.
: linking second messengers and small GTPases. Trends Cell Biol 2006;16:640–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
lipase activity. Methods Enzymol 2005;407:99–107.[Medline]
and phospholipase Cβ3 in a temporally distinct manner. J Biol Chem 2006;281:2639–48.
Guanine nucleotide exchange factor activity and activation of Rap1. Methods Enzymol 2006;407:281–90.[CrossRef][Medline]
. Mol Cell Biol 2005;6:2191–99.
modulates β-adrenergic receptor-dependent cardiac contraction and inhibits cardiac hypertrophy. Circ Res 2005;97:1305–13.
regulates ovulation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol 2004;274:201–10.[CrossRef][Medline]
in chemical carcinogen-induced skin tumor development. Cancer Res 2004;64:8808–10.
in the epidermis of transgenic mice results in striking alterations in phorbol ester-induced inflammation and COX-2, MIP-2 and TNF-
expression but not tumor promotion. J Cell Sci 1999;112:3497–506.[Abstract]
in the epidermis are resistant to skin tumor promotion by 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate. Cancer Res 1999;59:5710–8.
in mice results in impairment of epidermal hyperplasia and enhancement of tumor formation in two-stage skin carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 2005;65:7356–62.
but not PKC
suppresses intestinal tumor formation in ApcMin/+ mice. Cancer Res 2006;66:6955–63.
results in impairment of wound healing and enhancement of tumor formation in mouse skin carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 2003;63:2404–8.
expression in the developing mouse brain. Eur J Neurosci 2003;8:1571–80.
-dependent regulation of integrin activation in splenocytes. Mol Biol Cell 2007;18:2949–59.
716 knockout mice by inhibition of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2). Cell 1996;87:803–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
are resistant to skin carcinogenesis. Nat Med 1999;5:828–31.[CrossRef][Medline]
mediates phorbol ester-induced inflammation and epidermal hyperplasia. FASEB J 1994;8:1081–7.[Abstract]
up-regulation in vivo by a potent carcinogen 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA) and control of DMBA-induced inflammatory responses. Cancer Res 2002;62:417–23.
in induction of constitutive NF-
B activation in pancreatic cancer cells. J Biol Chem 2004;279:16452–62.
in uterine smooth muscle cells requires an AP-1 site: cloning and partial characterization of the rat IL-1
promoter. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1999;152:21–35.[CrossRef][Medline]
promoter are associated with allele-specific expression of IL-1
in CD4+ T cells. Blood 2006;108:2143–9.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Li, H. Edamatsu, R. Kitazawa, S. Kitazawa, and T. Kataoka Phospholipase C{varepsilon} promotes intestinal tumorigenesis of ApcMin/+ mice through augmentation of inflammation and angiogenesis Carcinogenesis, August 1, 2009; 30(8): 1424 - 1432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Raaijmakers and J. L. Bos Specificity in Ras and Rap Signaling J. Biol. Chem., April 24, 2009; 284(17): 10995 - 10999. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. K. Harden, S. N. Hicks, and J. Sondek Phospholipase C isozymes as effectors of Ras superfamily GTPases J. Lipid Res., April 1, 2009; 50(Supplement): S243 - S248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Oestreich, S. Malik, S. A. Goonasekera, B. C. Blaxall, G. G. Kelley, R. T. Dirksen, and A. V. Smrcka Epac and Phospholipase C{epsilon} Regulate Ca2+ Release in the Heart by Activation of Protein Kinase C{epsilon} and Calcium-Calmodulin Kinase II J. Biol. Chem., January 16, 2009; 284(3): 1514 - 1522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |