
Cancer Research 68, 6038, August 1, 2008. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1009
© 2008 American Association for Cancer Research
17β-Estradiol Mobilizes Bone Marrow–Derived Endothelial Progenitor Cells to Tumors
Robert Suriano1,
Devyani Chaudhuri1,
Raja Singh Johnson2,
Erin Lambers2,
Badithe T. Ashok1,
Raj Kishore2 and
Raj K. Tiwari1
1 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York and 2 Feinberg Cardiovascular Research Institute, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
Requests for reprints: Raj K. Tiwari, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595. Phone: 914-594-4870; Fax: 914-594-4879; E-mail: raj_tiwari{at}nymc.edu and Raj Kishore, Feinberg Cardiovascular Research Institute, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611. Phone: 312-503-1651; E-mail: r-kishore{at}northwestern.edu.
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
Neovascularization is critical for tumor growth and development. The cellular mediators for this process are yet to be defined. We discovered that bone marrow–derived endothelial progenitor cells (BM-EPC), having the phenotype (CD133+, CD34+, VEGFR-2+), initiate neovascularization in response to TG1-1 mammary cells implanted in the inguinal mammary gland of Tie-2 GFP transgenic mice. The fluorescence tag allowed for tracing the migration of green fluorescent protein–tagged endothelial progenitor cells to tumor tissues. We discovered that 17-β estradiol supplementation of ovariectomized mice significantly enhanced BM-EPC–induced neovascularization and secretion of angiogenic factors within the tumor microenvironment. Cell-based system analyses showed that estrogen-stimulated BM-EPCs secreted paracrine factors which enhanced TG1-1 cell proliferation and migration. Furthermore, TG1-1 cell medium supplemented with estrogen-induced BM-EPC mediated tubulogenesis, which was an experimental in vivo representation of the neovasculature. Our data provide evidence of BM-EPC mammary tumor cell interactions and identify a novel cellular mediator of tumor progression that can be exploited clinically. [Cancer Res 2008;68(15):6038–42]
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
Neovascularization is a critical process needed for tissue repair (1) and is indispensable for tumor growth and metastases (2, 3). This process requires assistance from bone marrow–derived endothelial progenitor cells (BM-EPC), phenotypically characterized as CD133+, CD34+, and VEGFR-2+ (4–6). Mobilization and homing of EPCs from the bone is influenced by molecules such as vascular endothelial growth factor and proteases such as matrix metalloproteinase-9 (7, 8). Interestingly, estrogen (E2) has been implicated in the proliferation and mobilization of EPCs by stimulating the expression of EPC nitric oxide synthetase (9).
Despite the evidence that breast cancers initiate as E2-responsive and 60% of breast cancers are E2-dependent, no studies have examined the possible involvement of E2 on EPC mobilization and their contribution to neovascularization. Clinically, circulating EPCs were increased in patients with stage III and IV breast cancers, suggesting that they may correlate with disease (10). In this study, we examined the contribution of EPCs in breast cancer–responsive neovascularization using the well characterized Tie2/green fluorescent protein (GFP) murine model, in which GFP expression is under the endothelial cell–specific receptor tyrosine kinase Tek, (formerly Tie2) promoter. To test our hypothesis of whether E2 mobilizes circulating EPCs that home to implanted breast carcinomas and participate in tumor neovascularization, we used ovariectomized Tg (TIE2GFP)287SATO/J female mice supplemented with E2. We also examined EPC and breast cancer cell interactions, as well as the effect of E2 in both in vivo–based and in vitro–based experimental systems.
 |
Materials and Methods
|
|---|
Animal model and orthotopic implantation of tumor cells. Tg (TIE2GFP)287SATO/J mice (Jackson Laboratories) were grouped as follows: nonovariectomized (Intact), ovariectomized (OVX), and ovariectomized + E2 supplemented (OVX + E2) by implantation of 90-day release estradiol pellets (1.7 mg/pellet; Innovative Research of America) 1 week prior to surgery. Tumor induction was done by implanting 2 x 106 TG1-1 cells in the cleared mammary fat pad.
EPC mobilization experiments. Mononuclear cells, isolated by using a Histopaque-1083 (Sigma) density gradient, were stained with FITC anti-CD133 antibody (PharMingen) with isotype-matched antibodies (negative control). Immunofluorescence-labeled cells were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde and analyzed using FACStar flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson) and Cell Quest Software counting 10,000 events per sample.
EPC characterization experiments. Mononuclear cells were cultured in EBM2 (Clonetics; ref. 8). Four days after culture on four-well glass slides coated with rat plasma vitronectin (Sigma) in 0.5% gelatin solution, EPCs were assayed by costaining with acetylated LDL-DiI (Biomedical Technologies) and FITC conjugated BS lectin-1 (Vector Laboratories), both of which are markers characteristic of endothelial lineage (8).
TG1-1 tumor cell migration and proliferation. Primary cultures of EPCs from mice were cultured with or without estradiol (10–8 mol/L) 7 days in complete EBM2 medium. Medium from EPC cultures, with or without E2 and ER
inhibitor (ICI 182780, 1 µmol/L) or ERβ inhibitor (MJM II-17B, 1 µmol/L), was harvested and added to TG1-1 tumor cells for 48 h. TG1-1 proliferative activity was measured by tritiated thymidine ([3H]TdR) incorporation for 18 h and migration of TG1-1 cells was measured using a modified Boyden chamber (11).
In vitro EPC tubulogenesis. Primary cultures of EPCs were isolated from intact mouse bone marrow and plated on growth factor–reduced Matrigel-coated (300 µL; Becton Dickinson) dishes in EBM2 medium. Cells (50,000 cells/slide) were plated on Matrigel chambers and tubulogenesis monitored 24 h after the addition or not of E2-supplemented TG1-1 cell–conditioned medium.
 |
Results and Discussion
|
|---|
BM-EPCs and TG1-1 cells express ER
. Consistent with earlier observations in the literature, we observed the expression of ER
in tumor-bearing mammary gland sections (Fig. 1A
), in neovasculature (merged fields, Fig. 1A), and in TG1-1 cells (Fig. 1B) using immunofluorescence and Western blotting. TG1-1 cells being derived from HER-2/neu background also express HER-2/neu (Fig. 1C).
E2 induces the mobilization of BM-EPCs into the circulation and homing to tumor tissues. Implanting 2 x 106 or 4 x 106 TG1-1 cells/mouse resulted in 100% tumor incidence for all groups of mice with the histology of the tumors consistent through groups and characteristic of TG1-1–induced tumors (Supplementary Fig. S1; Supplementary Table S1). Double-positive cells for GFP (endothelial lineage) and CD133 (hematopoietic stem cell marker) were counted as a representative population of circulating EPCs and E2 significantly increased the number of circulating EPCs in the blood, peaking at day 3 and returning to baseline by day 7 (Fig. 2A
). The presence of authentic EPCs was validated by costaining with markers of endothelial lineage acetylated LDL-DiI and FITC-conjugated BS lectin-1 (Fig. 2B). Vascular structures or capillaries were detected through GFP expression of EPCs. The presence of tumors increased the number of capillaries (Fig. 2C) and E2-mediated effect on capillary enhancement (Fig. 2D). Quantitation of the data revealed a 2-fold enhancement suggesting that E2 not only mediates EPC migration but also participates in capillary formation in response to implanted tumors.
E2-induced homing of EPCs to tumor tissues is accompanied by enhanced expression of angiogenic and matrix metalloproteinase RNA transcripts. Further evidence supporting the homing of EPCs to tumor sites, thus leading to neovascularization, was confirmed by immunofluorescence staining of tumors with anti-CD133 (Fig. 3A
). The number of CD133-positive cells was significantly higher in OVX + E2 mice (156 ± 2.9) compared with OVX – E2 mice (65 ± 3.1). Also, colocalization of CD133-positive endothelial cells with GFP-positive endothelial cells (red arrows) was observed, suggesting that not only do EPCs home to the tumor-bearing gland but physically associate with new blood vessels, which was considerably enhanced in response to E2. Consistent with previous published literature (12–17), during cardiac injury, we observed an E2-induced enhanced expression of secretory angiogenic paracrine cytokines such as angiopoetin-1, angiopoetin-2, thrombospondin-1, vascular endothelial growth factor, matrix metalloproteases 2 and 9, and basic fibroblast growth factor. Expression of these cytokines indicates that E2 participates not only in neovascularization by recruiting EPCs but also by inducing biochemical components which promote a microenvironment conducive to tumor survival and growth (Fig. 3B).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 3. Estrogen homes BM-EPCs to tumor tissues and enhances angiogenic and matrix metalloproteinase RNA transcripts. Immunofluorescent staining of mammary gland sections show an increased presence of EPCs in OVX + E2 tumor-bearing glands as opposed to OVX and Intact tumor-bearing glands. Red arrows, colocalization of GFP+ and CD133+ endothelial EPCs. Overall, significant and consistent increases in the angiogenic and MMP RNA transcripts assayed were observed in OVX + E2 mice (white columns) compared with OVX mice (gray columns). Columns, fold expression over the levels observed in control mammary glands without tumor; *, statistically significant differences.
|
|
E2 enhances TG1-1 cells and EPCs to secrete paracrine cytokines which lead to cell tubulogenesis, migration, and proliferation. We also present evidence that the mobilized EPCs participate in tubulogenesis, which is a hallmark activity of EPCs in vitro (18). EPCs cultured in vitro with TG1-1–conditioned medium supplemented with E2 displayed the formation of well-organized and defined tubes (Fig. 4A
). Examination of the proliferative effect of secreted EPC factors on TG1-1 tumor cells indicated that EPC-conditioned medium supplemented with E2 significantly enhanced TG1-1 proliferation as measured by [3H]TdR incorporation (Fig. 4B). Furthermore, TG1-1 cell migration increased towards E2-conditioned EPC medium as opposed to non–E2-conditioned EPC medium (Fig. 4C). This E2-enhanced migration and proliferative activity was abrogated in the presence of both inhibitors of ER
(ICI) and ERβ (MJM II-17B; Fig. 4B and C), showing the ability of E2 to orchestrate a synergistic interplay between breast cancer and endothelial cells to generate a tumor-supportive environment.

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 4. Estrogen stimulates EPCs and TG1-1 cells to secrete paracrine factors that induce tubulogenesis, migration, and proliferation. E2-stimulated TG1-1 cell culture medium was added to EPC cultures which were monitored for tubulogenesis. Well-organized tubules were present in EPC cultures which received E2-supplemented TG1-1 medium, as opposed to cultures which received non–E2-supplemented TG1-1 medium, or EPC cultures grown in normal medium (A). Culture medium from estrogen (10–8 mol/L) stimulated EPCs (white columns) was observed to increase TG1-1 tumor cell proliferation, quantitated by thymidine incorporation (B) and migration (C) when compared with non–E2-supplemented EPC culture medium (gray columns). The stimulatory effect of E2 on EPCs was validated through the use of an ER inhibitor, ICI 182780 (horizontally striped columns), and the ERβ inhibitor, MJM II-17B (vertically striped columns), in which TG1-1 cell proliferation and migration was significantly decreased; *, statistically significant differences.
|
|
In summary, our data suggest that E2 acts as a mobilizing agent for EPCs, which is tumor-responsive. This results in enhanced circulating EPCs that home to the tumor and initiate the neovascularization of tumors as well as participate in secreting endothelial and tumor-enhancing factors. The effect of antiestrogens on the E2 responsiveness of EPCs suggests the possible use of selective antiestrogens to target EPC mobilization, and hence, neovascularization of primary and metastatic breast cancers. Furthermore, because E2-mediated signaling pathways cross-talk with other receptor signal transduction pathways such as HER-2/neu, therapies directed against HER-2/neu may also serve as a novel target (19). Analogous to the use of liposomes and exosomes as delivery vehicles of toxic compounds to tumor tissue (20), EPCs can be perceived as a "Trojan horse", whereby their mobilization to the tumor environment can be exploited for the specific delivery of anticancer compounds for breast cancer therapy.
 |
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
|
|---|
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
 |
Acknowledgments
|
|---|
Grant support: U.S. Army grant W81XWH-06-1-0684 (R.K. Tiwari).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
 |
Footnotes
|
|---|
Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Research Online (http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/).
Current address for B.T. Ashok: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, NY 10591.
Received 3/17/08.
Revised 5/12/08.
Accepted 5/17/08.
 |
References
|
|---|
- Hamada H, Kim MK, Iwakura A, et al. Estrogen receptors
and β mediate contribution of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells to functional recovery after myocardial infarction. Circulation 2006;114:2261–70.[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Asahara T, Masuda H, Takahashi T, et al. Bone marrow origin of endothelial progenitor cells responsible for postnatal vasculogenesis in physiological and pathological neo-vascularization. Circ Res 1999;85:221–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Gao D, Nolan DJ, Mellick AS, Bambino K, McDonnell K, Mittal V. Endothelial progenitor cells control the angiogenic switch in mouse lung metastasis. Science 2008;319:195–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Asahara T, Murohara T, Sullivan A, et al. Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science 1997;275:964–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Yin AH, Miraglia S, Zanjani ED, et al. AC133, a novel marker for human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Blood 1997;90:5002–12.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Peichev M, Naiyer AJ, Pereira D, et al. Expression of VEGFR-2 and AC133 by circulating human CD34(+) cells identifies a population of functional endothelial precursors. Blood 2000;95:952–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- van Hinsbergh VW, Koolwijk P. Endothelial sprouting and angiogenesis: matrix metalloproteinases in the lead. Cardiovasc Res 2008;78:203–12.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Asahara T, Takahashi T, Masuda H, et al. VEGF contributes to postnatal neo-vascularization by mobilizing bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells. EMBO J 1999;18:3964–72.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Iwakura A, Luedemann C, Shastry S, et al. Estrogen-mediated, endothelial nitric oxide synthase-dependent mobilization of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells contributes to reendothelial after arterial injury. Circulation 2003;108:r144–50.
- Naik RP, Jin D, Chuang E, et al. Circulating endothelial progenitor cells correlate to stage in patients with invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2008;107:133–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Yamaguci J, Kusano KF, Masuo O, et al. Stromal cell-derived factor-1 effects on ex vivo expanded endothelial progenitor cell recruitment for ischemic neo-vascularization. Circulation 2003;107:1322–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Chen F, Tan Z, Dong YC, et al. Combination of VEGF165/angiopoietin-1 gene and endothelial progenitor cells for therapeutic neo-vascularization. Euro J Pharm 2007;568:222–30.[CrossRef]
- Kawamoto A, Gwon HC, Iwaguro H, et al. Therapeutic potential of ex vivo expanded endothelial progenitor cells for mycocardial ischemia. Circulation 2001;103:634–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Gill M, Dias S, Hattori K, et al. Vascular trauma induces rapid but transient mobilization of VEGFR2(+)AC133(+) endothelial precursor cells. Circ Res 2001;88:167–74.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Takahashi T, Kalka C, Masuda H, et al. Ischemia- and cytokine induced mobilization of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells for neo-vascularization. Nat Med 1999;5:434–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Omaida C. Angiogenesis and vasculogenesis: inducing the growth of new blood vessels and would healing by stimulation of bone marrow-derived progenitor cell mobilization and homing. J Vasc Surg 2007;45:39–47A.[CrossRef]
- Ochi N, Matsuo Y, Sawai H, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor-C secreted by pancreatic cancer cell line promotes lymphatic endothelial cell migration in an in vivo model of tumor lymphangiogenesis. Pancreas 2007;34:444–51.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Deroanne FC, Lapiere MC, Nusgens VB. In vitro tubulogenesis of endothelial cells by relaxation of the coupling extracellular matrix-cytoskeleton. Cardiovasc Res 2001;49:647–58.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Shou J, Massarweh S, Osborne CK, et al. Mechanisms of tamoxifen resistance; increased estrogen receptor-HER-2/neu crosstalk in ER HER-2/neu positive breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:926–35.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Lacko AG, Nair M, Paranjape S, Mooberry L, McConathy WJ. Trojan horse meets magic bullet to spawn a novel, highly effective drug delivery model. Chemotherapy 2006;52:171–7.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. M Arendt, L. C Evans, D. E Rugowski, M. J. Garcia-Barchino, H. Rui, and L. A Schuler
Ovarian hormones are not required for PRL-induced mammary tumorigenesis, but estrogen enhances neoplastic processes
J. Endocrinol.,
October 1, 2009;
203(1):
99 - 110.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|