
Cancer Research 68, 6578, August 15, 2008. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0855
© 2008 American Association for Cancer Research
Cell, Tumor, and Stem Cell Biology |
Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-
Induces Cell Proliferation by a Cyclin E1–Dependent Mechanism and Is Up-regulated in Thyroid Tumors
Lingchun Zeng1,
Yan Geng2,
Maria Tretiakova1,
Xuemei Yu1,
Peter Sicinski2 and
Todd G. Kroll1
1 Department of Pathology, University of Chicago School of Medicine, University of Chicago Cancer Research Center, Chicago, Illinois and 2 Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Department of Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Requests for reprints: Todd G. Kroll, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, AMB P323 (MC1089), Chicago, IL 60637. Phone: 773-702-3017; Fax: 773-834-5251; E-mail: tkroll{at}bsd.uchicago.edu.
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are lipid-sensing nuclear receptors that have been implicated in multiple physiologic processes including cancer. Here, we determine that PPAR
induces cell proliferation through a novel cyclin E1–dependent mechanism and is up-regulated in many human thyroid tumors. The expression of PPAR
was induced coordinately with proliferation in primary human thyroid cells by the activation of serum, thyroid-stimulating hormone/cyclic AMP, or epidermal growth factor/mitogen-activated protein kinase mitogenic signaling pathways. Engineered overexpression of PPAR
increased thyroid cell number, the incorporation of bromodeoxyuridine, and the phosphorylation of retinoblastoma protein by 40% to 45% in just 2 days, one usual cell population doubling. The synthetic PPAR
agonist GW501516 augmented these PPAR
proliferation effects in a dose-dependent manner. Overexpression of PPAR
increased cyclin E1 protein by 9-fold, whereas knockdown of PPAR
by small inhibitory RNA reduced both cyclin E1 protein and cell proliferation by 2-fold. Induction of proliferation by PPAR
was abrogated by knockdown of cyclin E1 by small inhibitory RNA in primary thyroid cells and by knockout of cyclin E1 in mouse embryo fibroblasts, confirming a cyclin E1 dependence for this PPAR
pathway. In addition, the mean expression of native PPAR
was increased by 2-fold to 5-fold (P < 0.0001) and correlated with that of the in situ proliferation marker Ki67 (R = 0.8571; P = 0.02381) in six different classes of benign and malignant human thyroid tumors. Our experiments identify a PPAR
mechanism that induces cell proliferation through cyclin E1 and is regulated by growth factor and lipid signals. The data argue for systematic investigation of PPAR
antagonists as antineoplastic agents and implicate altered PPAR
–cyclin E1 signaling in thyroid and other carcinomas. [Cancer Res 2008;68(16):6578–86]
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) form molecular complexes with hydrophobic ligands such as fatty acids, the 9-cis-retinoic acid receptor (retinoid X receptor) and coactivators to regulate the transcription of target genes (1, 2). The three major PPARs,
,
, and
(NR1C1, NR1C2, and NR1C3), are encoded by separate genes and have distinct patterns of expression and biological activities. PPAR
is expressed primarily in liver, brown adipose, kidney, and heart tissues (3). It plays a central role in fatty acid uptake and oxidation and is the target of the fibrate drugs that are used to treat patients with dyslipidemia (4). PPAR
is expressed most highly in fat and macrophages. PPAR
functions in adipogenesis, lipid storage, glucose homeostasis, inflammtion, and atherosclerosis (5, 6). Synthetic thiazolidinedione agonists for PPAR
are used to treat patients with type 2 diabetes (7). PPAR
is more widely expressed than PPAR
and PPAR
, implying a more general cell function that is not yet understood. PPAR
has been implicated in fatty acid β-oxidation (8), muscle fiber–type remodeling (9), lipoprotein metabolism, and glucose uptake (10, 11). A synthetic agonist for PPAR
modulated HDL and triglyceride levels in healthy volunteers (12). Thus, all three PPARs function in aspects of lipid metabolism.
PPARs have also been implicated in tumorigenesis but the molecular mechanisms are not well understood. For example, PPAR
is thought to mediate the carcinogenic effects of peroxisome proliferators in hepatocellular carcinoma in rodents (13). In addition, both PPAR
and PPAR
modulate colon tumorigenesis in predisposed mouse models (14–18). Furthermore, natural mutations in PPAR
have been identified in human colon (19) and thyroid carcinoma (20, 21) tissues. These findings indicate significant functions for PPARs in thyroid cancer and physiology.
Here, we show that PPAR
is the predominant PPAR that is expressed in normal human thyroid cells and tissues. Our experiments have determined that PPAR
induces cell proliferation by a novel cyclin E1–dependent mechanism and is up-regulated in six different classes of human thyroid tumors. The results show that PPAR
regulates epithelial cell proliferation via cyclin E1, growth factor, and lipid signals. Thus, deregulation of the PPAR
-cyclin E1 signaling axis seems to be important in thyroid and other carcinomas.
 |
Materials and Methods
|
|---|
Cell lines and primary cultures of human thyroid cells. Primary cultures of human thyroid follicular epithelial cells were isolated from normal thyroid tissues by mechanical dispersion and treatment with collagenase P and dispase II (Roche), as previously described (ref. 22; Supplemental Fig. S1A–D). The primary thyroid cells were cultured in RPMI medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2 mmol/L of L-glutamine, and penicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen). Fungizone (Invitrogen) and primocin (Sigma) were present in the medium for the first 2 to 3 days. The primary cells were maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. 293T human embryonic kidney cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection.
Immunoreagents and chemicals. PPAR
(H74) antiserum, PPAR
(E8) antibody, cyclin E1 (M20) antiserum, cyclin A2 (BF683) antibody, cyclin B1 (GNS1) antibody, p21 (F5) antibody, p27 (F8) antibody, cyclin D1 (H295) antiserum, and goat anti-mouse IgG-horseradish peroxidase (HRP) secondary antibody were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. Phosphorylated retinoblastoma (phospho-Rb) antiserum was purchased from Cell Signaling. Cyclin D3 antiserum (LabVision), anti-rabbit IgG-HRP (GE Healthcare), thyroglobulin antiserum (M0781; DAKO), β-actin antibody (Sigma), and anti–bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd)-fluorescein (Roche) were also used. The PPAR
agonist GW501516 was purchased from Cayman Chemical. Epidermal growth factor (EGF), thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), and insulin were purchased from Sigma.
SDS-PAGE and immunoblots. Total protein was extracted from tissues or cells with lysis buffers containing nonionic (NP40 or Triton X-100) and/or ionic (sodium dodecylsulfate and sodium deoxycholate) detergents (U.S. Biochemical or Sigma) and Complete Mini protease inhibitors (Roche). Twenty to 40 µg of protein was separated on bis/tris SDS-PAGE gels in the MOPS system (Invitrogen) and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad) using a semidry apparatus (Hoeffer). Nitrocellulose membranes were blocked in 5% nonfat dry milk, incubated at 4°C with primary antibody or antiserum overnight, incubated with HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 to 2 h at room temperature and detected using enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham). The blots were stripped and reprobed with β-actin as a loading control. Total protein in cell lysates was determined with a modified Bradford assay (Bio-Rad). Protein levels were quantified on X-ray films from immunoblots using ImageJ software.3 Values were normalized to levels of control β-actin in the same lanes. Kaleidoscope (Bio-Rad) and MagicMark (Invitrogen) markers were used as molecular weight standards.
Electroporation and transfection. Electroporations were performed using the VPI-1005 Amaxa system (Amaxa, Inc.) that achieved 60% to 80% transduction efficiency in primary thyroid cells as determined by expression of control green fluorescent protein plasmids based on fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry.4 pCDNA3.1 or pCDNA3.2 expression vectors (Invitrogen) or small inhibitory RNAs (siRNA; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) were introduced into primary thyroid cells by electroporation, and the cells were allowed to recover for 2 days in normal growth medium. Electroporation experiments were repeated three to five times using preparations of primary thyroid cells from different patients. 293T cells were transfected with Fugene (Roche), according to the manufacturer's recommendations.
Cell proliferation assays. Cell proliferation was determined by cell counting and the incorporation of BrdUrd into cell nuclei. Cells were counted using an automated Z2 particle counter (Beckman-Coulter). For BrdUrd incorporation, cells were plated on glass coverslips and BrdUrd was added to the culture medium 3 to 5 h before fixation. The cells were fixed in absolute methanol at 4°C, denatured in 2 mol/L of HCl and stained with mouse anti–BrdUrd fluorescein conjugate (Roche), according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Propidium iodide was used as the nuclear counterstain. Microscopic fields were selected randomly and
200 cells were counted under each condition. BrdUrd-positive cells were calculated as the percentage of total cells in each field. For GW501516 treatment, cells were incubated in medium with 10% charcoal dextran–stripped FBS (Hyclone).
RNA isolation and reverse transcription-PCR. Total RNA was extracted from cells or tissues using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). cDNA was synthesized using SuperScript first-strand synthesis kit (Invitrogen) from 2 µg of total RNA. PCR was performed with the following primers: PPAR
forward primer 5'-ACT GAG TTC GCC AAG AGC ATC-3' and PPAR
reverse primer 5'-TTA GTA CAT GTC CTT GTA GAT CT-3' (546 bp); PPAR
forward primer 5'-TGA CTT GAA CGA CCA AGT AAC TC-3' and PPAR
reverse primer 5'-CTA GTA CAA GTC CTT GTA GAT CTC-3' (508 bp); PPAR
forward primer 5'-TCC GCA TCT TTC ACT GCT GCC A-3' and PPAR
reverse primer 5'-TCA GTA CAT GTC CCT GTA GAT C-3' (600 bp); β-actin forward primer 5'-TCC TTC CTG GGC ATG GAG TC-3' and β-actin reverse primer 5'-GTA ACG CAA CTA AGT CAT AGT C-3' (361 bp). PCR products were analyzed on 1% to 1.7% agarose gels and visualized by ethidium bromide staining.
Immunohistochemistry. Tissue sections were deparaffinized in xylenes, rehydrated through a graded ethanol series and washed in TBS. Antigen retrieval was carried out by heating in DTRS buffer (pH 6; DAKO) or Tris-EDTA (pH 9) buffer for 15 min in a microwave. Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked by 3% H2O2 in methanol for 5 min. Nonspecific binding sites were blocked by Protein Block (DAKO) for 20 min. Tissue sections were incubated for 1 h at room temperature with rabbit antiserum against PPAR
(H74; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), monoclonal antibody against PPAR
(E8, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), or monoclonal antibody against Ki67 proliferation antigen (clone KiS5, DAKO). This was followed by a 30-min incubation with goat anti-mouse or goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to HRP-labeled polymer (EnVision, DAKO). Slides were developed for 5 min with 3-3'-diaminobenzidine chromogen and counterstained with Gil's hematoxylin. Negative controls were performed by substituting primary antibody with nonimmune mouse or rabbit immunoglobulins.
Construction of thyroid tissue microarrays. Tissue microarrays were constructed using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks from 103 patients with benign and malignant thyroid tumors that were selected by two experienced endocrine pathologists (T.G. Kroll and M. Tretiakova): 18 follicular adenomas, 20 follicular carcinomas, 37 papillary carcinomas, 10 anaplastic carcinomas, 9 Hurthle cell adenomas, and 9 Hurthle cell carcinomas were chosen. Seventy-six corresponding normal thyroid tissues were selected from the same thyroid blocks as controls. A minimum of two tissue cylinders with a diameter of 1 mm were arrayed using an automated tissue microarrayer (ATA-27, Beecher Instruments). Recipient blocks were cut into 4-µm-thick sections on Surgipath silane-coated positively charged slides. PPAR
expression was quantified by two methods. First, PPAR
immunoreactivity was calculated as a Reiner score (23) based on the nuclear and cytoplasmic intensity and the percentage of immunoreactive cells visualized manually by bright-field microscopy. Second, PPAR
expression was quantified using the Chromavision automated cellular imaging system (ACIS), with positive brown nuclear and cytoplasmic staining recorded as a numerical score between 0 and 225 for each pixel and normalized to an area of 1 µm2. Nuclear staining for Ki67 was quantified using ACIS based on three color parameters: hue, luminosity, and saturation. The ACIS software was instructed by setting color-specific thresholds to determine brown (positive stain) from blue (negative counterstain) in the nuclei within outlined areas. The percentage of positively stained nuclei (nuclear index) was calculated from 200 to 500 cells in each tissue sample.
Statistical analyses. Cell proliferation was calculated as the mean of duplicate or triplicate measurements ±SD. P values were calculated using a two-tailed Student's t test for continuous variables. Correlations were calculated using the Spearman rank correlation test. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
 |
Results
|
|---|
PPAR
is expressed in normal human thyroid cells and tissues. We first determined the expression of PPAR
, PPAR
, and PPAR
in normal human thyroid cells and tissues. Cultures of primary thyroid cells were isolated from normal human thyroid tissues that were obtained after surgery for thyroid tumors (Supplemental Fig. S1A–C). The primary cultures were 85% to 90% pure and retained differentiated functions such as the expression of thyroglobulin and thyroperoxidase in response to TSH (Supplemental Fig. S1D). PPAR
mRNA was abundant, whereas PPAR
mRNA was low and PPAR
mRNA was barely detectable in normal thyroid tissue and primary thyroid cells based on reverse transcription-PCR (Fig. 1A
). PPAR
expression was estimated to be 10-fold to 15-fold higher than PPAR
expression based on Northern blots that detected the PPAR
(3.7 kb) and PPAR
(1.9 kb) mRNA transcripts.4 PPAR
mRNA was highest in control adipose tissue and PPAR
mRNA was highest in control HepG2 hepatocellular carcinoma cells (Fig. 1A). The expression of β-actin was similar in all samples (Fig. 1A).

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 1. PPAR is expressed highly and correlates with proliferation in normal thyroid cells and tissue. A, reverse transcription-PCR showed that PPAR mRNA was abundant, PPAR mRNA was low, and PPAR mRNA was barely detectable in normal thyroid cells and tissue. β-Actin mRNA served as the positive control. B, expression of PPAR protein was abundant in normal thyroid cells and tissue based on immunoblots using the H74 antiserum against PPAR (left). 293T cells transfected with PPAR , PPAR -V5, PPAR , or PPAR -V5 showed that H74 was specific for PPAR and did not cross-react with PPAR (right). C, loss of PPAR expression paralleled that of phospho-Rb after removal of FBS from the culture medium to inhibit cell proliferation. The expression of thyroglobulin, a marker of thyroid differentiation, was increased after FBS removal. D, an induction in PPAR expression paralleled that of phospho-Rb after the addition of FBS to the culture medium to stimulate the proliferation of quiescent thyroid cells. The expression of thyroglobulin was reduced and β-actin was relatively constant after the addition of FBS.
|
|
Expression of PPAR
protein was next determined by immunoblotting. H74 antiserum against PPAR
reacted on immunoblots with the native PPAR
protein (50 kDa) in normal thyroid tissues and primary thyroid cells (Fig. 1B, left). H74 also reacted with PPAR
and PPAR
-V5 but not with PPAR
(54 kDa) or PPAR
-V5 that were expressed by transfection in 293T kidney cells (Fig. 1B, right). Immunohistochemistry showed that H74 reacted with the nuclei and cytoplasm of normal thyroid cells in paraffin-embedded tissue sections (Supplemental Fig. S2A). This nuclear immunoreactivity was not elevated in thyroid carcinomas that expressed the PAX8-PPAR
fusion protein (Supplemental Fig. S2B; ref. 21), which reacted strongly with the E8 antibody against PPAR
in the same tissue sections (Supplemental Fig. S2C). These experiments show that (a) PPAR
is the predominant PPAR expressed in normal thyroid cells and tissues and (b) the H74 antiserum is specific for PPAR
.
Expression of PPAR
correlates with cell proliferation and is induced by thyroid mitogens. We observed that the expression of PPAR
correlated directly with proliferation in thyroid cells. For example, PPAR
protein decreased on immunoblots after removal of FBS from the culture medium and this paralleled a reduction in phospho-Rb (Fig. 1C), an established marker of cell proliferation. In a complementary fashion, the expression of PPAR
protein increased in parallel with phospho-Rb when quiescent primary thyroid cells were induced to re-enter the cell cycle by the addition of FBS to the culture medium (Fig. 1D). The level of PPAR
in these experiments varied inversely with thyroid differentiation, as measured by the markers thyroglobulin (Fig. 1C and D) and thyroperoxidase.4 Control β-actin protein was relatively constant (Fig. 1C and D). These results show that the expression of PPAR
correlates directly with proliferation and inversely with differentiation in normal thyroid cells.
We next determined the effects of thyroid mitogens on expression of PPAR
. Expression of PPAR
and phospho-Rb were induced in parallel in quiescent thyroid cells by treatment with TSH plus insulin or EGF plus insulin but not with insulin alone (Fig. 2A
). The TSH/cyclic AMP and EGF/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK/ERK) pathways induce proliferation in thyroid cells in the presence of insulin/insulin-like growth factor-I, which are permissive for proliferation but have no mitogenic activity by themselves (24). As predicted, the MEK/ERK inhibitor U1026 and the pKa inhibitor H89 each attenuated the induction of PPAR
(Fig. 2B) and phospho-Rb4 by EGF and TSH treatment, respectively. Thus, PPAR
is increased coordinately with proliferation that is induced in normal thyroid cells by serum, TSH, or EGF.
PPAR
regulates proliferation in normal thyroid cells. To determine whether PPAR
itself regulates cell proliferation, we performed both gain-of-function and loss-of-function experiments. First, overexpression of PPAR
by electroporation increased thyroid cell number by 40% to 45% (Fig. 3A
) and the incorporation of BrdUrd by 30% to 35% (Fig. 3B) over 5 days compared with vector controls. In contrast, overexpression of control PPAR
in the same experiment had little effect (Fig. 3A and B). Second, efficient knockdown of endogenous PPAR
by siRNA decreased thyroid cell number (Fig. 3A) and the incorporation of BrdUrd by 50% to 55% (Fig. 3B) compared with oligonucleotide controls. The levels of PPAR
, PPAR
, and β-actin were confirmed on immunoblots in these experiments (Fig. 3C). The E8 antibody cross-reacts with both PPAR
and PPAR
(Fig. 3C, right). These data determine that PPAR
regulates proliferation in normal human thyroid cells.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 3. PPAR induces proliferation in normal human thyroid cells. A, overexpression of PPAR by electroporation increased thyroid cell numbers by 40% to 45%, whereas knockdown of PPAR by siRNA decreased thyroid cell numbers by 50% to 55% over 5 d. Overexpression of control PPAR had little effect in the same experiment. Columns, mean of duplicate or triplicate culture dishes; bars, SD (*, P < 0.0001). B, overexpression of PPAR increased the incorporation of BrdUrd by 30% to 35%, whereas knockdown of endogenous PPAR by siRNA decreased the incorporation of BrdUrd by 50% to 55% in the normal thyroid cells. Overexpression of control PPAR had little effect in the same experiment. Columns, mean of duplicate or triplicate culture dishes; bars, SD (*, P < 0.0001). C, immunoblots verified the levels of PPAR , PPAR , and β-actin in these experiments. The E8 PPAR antibody cross-immunoreacts with PPAR (right).
|
|
PPAR
induces cyclin E1 in normal thyroid cells. To establish the mechanism through which PPAR
induces thyroid cell proliferation, we measured regulators of the epithelial cell cycle. Cyclin E1 protein was increased 9-fold by overexpression of PPAR
and reduced 2-fold by siRNA knockdown of PPAR
in primary thyroid cells (Fig. 4A
). Phospho-Rb was increased 2-fold and decreased 2.5-fold, respectively, under the same conditions (Fig. 4A). Cyclin A2 was induced 2-fold by overexpression of PPAR
and reduced 4-fold by knockdown of PPAR
(Fig. 4A) but no significant changes in cyclins D1, D3, or B1, the cyclin-dependent kinase (cdk) inhibitors p21 or p27, or β-actin were observed (Fig. 4A). Overexpression of control PPAR
induced cyclin E1 by less than 2-fold and did not alter phospho-Rb (Fig. 4A). These data determine that PPAR
induces both cyclin E1 and proliferation in normal thyroid cells.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Figure 4. PPAR induces cell proliferation by a cyclin E1–dependent mechanism. A, overexpression of PPAR in normal thyroid cells by electroporation increased cyclin E1 protein 9-fold and phospho-Rb 2-fold compared with vector controls. Efficient knockdown of PPAR by siRNA decreased cyclin E1 2-fold and phospho-Rb 2.5-fold compared with oligonucleotide controls. Overexpression and knockdown of PPAR increased cyclin A2 2-fold and reduced cyclin A2 4-fold, respectively, whereas the expression of cyclins D1, D3, and B1, the cdk inhibitors p27 and p21, and β-actin changed little under the same conditions. Overexpression of control PPAR increased cyclin E1 by less than 2-fold and did not alter the levels of cyclin A2 or phospho-Rb. Measurements are normalized to β-actin and calculated as the fold change over vector or oligonucleotide controls. B, induction of proliferation by PPAR in normal thyroid cells was blocked by knockdown of cyclin E1 by siRNA. Columns, mean of duplicate culture dishes; bars, SD (*, P < 0.007). C, the induction of cell proliferation by PPAR was abrogated in cyclin E1–/– mouse embryo fibroblasts compared with wild-type mouse embryo fibroblasts or cyclin D1–/– mouse embryo fibroblasts. Black columns, cells overexpressing PPAR ; white columns, vector controls. Columns, mean of duplicate dishes; bars, SD (*, P < 0.004).
|
|
Induction of cell proliferation by PPAR
is dependent on cyclin E1. Two additional experiments showed that PPAR
regulates cell proliferation through a cyclin E1–dependent mechanism. First, down-regulation of cyclin E1 protein by siRNA blocked the incorporation of BrdUrd that was induced by PPAR
in primary thyroid cells (Fig. 4B). Second, induction of cell proliferation by PPAR
was not observed in mouse embryo fibroblasts that had knockout of the cyclin E1 gene, in contrast to wild-type mouse embryo fibroblasts or mouse embryo fibroblasts that had knockout of the cyclin D1 gene (Fig. 4C). These experiments show that induction of cell proliferation by PPAR
is dependent on cyclin E1.
GW501516 augments proliferation in normal thyroid cells. To determine whether proliferation by PPAR
is dependent on PPAR
lipid ligand, we tested the selective PPAR
agonist GW501516. Proliferation increased in a dose-dependent manner by treatment of primary thyroid cells with GW501516 (10–500 nmol/L), as determined by cell number (Fig. 5A
) and the incorporation of BrdUrd.4 No significant effects on the expression of endogenous PPAR
or β-actin protein were observed under these conditions (Fig. 5A). GW501516 (500 nmol/L) increased thyroid cell numbers by 35% to 40% compared with untreated thyroid cells over 6 days (Fig. 5B). We also determined the effects of GW501516 on thyroid cells after overexpression or siRNA knockdown of PPAR
. Thyroid cell number (Fig. 5C) and the incorporation of BrdUrd4 were dependent on the levels of both PPAR
and GW501516 in this experiment. Thus, synthetic PPAR
agonist, a surrogate for natural PPAR
lipid ligand, augmented proliferation by PPAR
in normal thyroid cells.
Expression of native PPAR
is elevated in benign and malignant human thyroid tumors. To further investigate PPAR
in a natural state of increased cell proliferation, we determined PPAR
levels in human thyroid tumors. PPAR
protein was measured by immunohistochemistry on tissue microarrays that contained six classes of thyroid tumors: 18 follicular adenomas, 20 follicular carcinomas, 37 papillary carcinomas, 10 anaplastic carcinomas, 9 Hurthle cell adenomas, and 9 Hurthle cell carcinomas. Seventy-six normal thyroid tissues from the same paraffin blocks were used as controls. The expression of PPAR
was quantified as described in Materials and Methods by (a) manual Reiner scoring (23) and (b) automated computer scanning (ACIS) from the bright-field microscope. Calculations from the two methods were consistent (Table 1
). PPAR
expression was moderate in the nuclei and low in the cytoplasm of normal thyroid tissues (mean ACIS score, 75.19; Table 1; Fig. 6A
), whereas PPAR
expression was elevated above normal levels in follicular adenomas (mean ACIS score, 208.44; P < 0.0001; Table 1; Fig. 6B), follicular carcinomas (mean ACIS score, 221.63; P < 0.0001; Table 1), papillary carcinomas (mean ACIS score, 394.11; P < 0.0001; Table 1; Fig. 6C), anaplastic carcinomas (mean ACIS score, 438.60; P < 0.0001; Table 1; Fig. 6D), Hurthle cell adenomas (mean ACIS score, 352.67; P < 0.0001; Table 1), and Hurthle cell carcinomas (mean ACIS score, 293.89; P < 0.0001; Table 1). PPAR
was increased predominantly in the nuclei of follicular (Fig. 6B) and Hurthle cell4 tumors and in both the nuclei and cytoplasm of papillary (Fig. 6C) and anaplastic (Fig. 6D) thyroid carcinomas. Mean expression of Ki67, an in situ marker of cell proliferation, was also elevated (P < 0.0219) in these thyroid tumors (Fig. 6A–D; Table 1) and correlated (R = 0.8571; P = 0.02381) with mean expression of PPAR
. Thus, the expression of native PPAR
protein correlated directly with cell proliferation in thyroid tumors in vivo as well as with thyroid cell proliferation in vitro.
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
PPARs are ligand-activated transcription factors that have been studied most thoroughly in lipid metabolism, adipogenesis, obesity, insulin sensitivity, and diabetes (1, 2). The PPARs have also been investigated in cancer but their mechanisms in tumorigenesis are not understood. Here, we determine a novel mechanism of PPAR
that induces cell proliferation through cyclin E1 and show that PPAR
is up-regulated in many human thyroid tumors.
We showed that the expression of PPAR
was high compared with PPAR
and PPAR
in normal human thyroid cells and tissues, as reported recently in the mouse (3). Our engineered overexpression of PPAR
in primary human thyroid cells generated a 40% to 45% increase in S phase cells in only 2 days. This is a remarkable induction because the usual transit time of primary thyroid cells through the cell cycle is 30 to 40 hours. The induction of proliferation by PPAR
was augmented by synthetic PPAR
agonist, which was a surrogate for natural PPAR
lipid ligand, and was associated with a 9-fold increase in cyclin E1 protein, a regulator of the epithelial cell cycle (25). Three additional experiments showed that the induction of proliferation by PPAR
was dependent on cyclin E1. First, knockdown of endogenous PPAR
by siRNA led to reductions in both cell proliferation and cyclin E1. Second, knockdown of endogenous cyclin E1 by siRNA abrogated thyroid cell proliferation that was induced by PPAR
. Third, the induction of proliferation by PPAR
was not present in cyclin E1–/– mouse embryo fibroblasts, in contrast to wild-type mouse embryo fibroblasts or cyclin D1–/– mouse embryo fibroblasts. These experiments determine a novel PPAR
mechanism that induces cell proliferation through cyclin E1, a hitherto unrecognized pathway of PPAR
-mediated cell growth control.
Our findings are compatible with the known functions of cyclin E1, which in association with Cdk2, drives cells from G1 into S phase in part by hyperphosphorylation of retinoblastoma protein (25). In fact, PPAR
protein is expressed early in G1 prior to expression and phosphorylation of retinoblastoma protein in quiescent primary thyroid cells that have been treated with serum and/or growth factors (Fig. 1).4 This kinetic pattern further supports the regulation of cyclin E1 by PPAR
, although the exact molecular underpinnings of this regulation remain to be elucidated. Interestingly, PPAR
knockout mice are smaller than wild-type littermate controls and this may reflect a deficiency in cell proliferation in tissues such as fat that are reduced in PPAR
knockout animals (10, 26). We observed that engineered overexpression in normal thyroid cells of PPAR
also induced cyclin A2, albeit to a lesser extent than cyclin E1. Cyclin A2, in complex with Cdk2 and Cdk1, promotes the passage of cells through the G1-S and G2-M transitions and thus cyclin A2 may modulate the effects of PPAR
on cell proliferation as well (27).
Our findings are consistent with previous reports showing that PPAR
stimulates proliferation in mouse preadipocytes, hepatocellular carcinoma cells, human endothelial cells, and breast, prostate, and colon carcinoma cells (28–31), although the mechanisms of PPAR
in these systems were not shown to involve cyclin E1. On the other hand, PPAR
has also been reported to inhibit proliferation in keratinocytes and mouse lung cancer cells (32, 33), raising the possibility that cell-dependent or culture-dependent responses to PPAR
may exist. In addition, factors that confound the interpretation of PPAR activities are common and include: (a) the coexpression of multiple endogenous PPAR isoforms, such as PPAR
and PPAR
that have differing effects on cell proliferation and overlapping functions at PPREs (34, 35); (b) the use of immortalized rodent cell lines that have altered growth responses compared with normal human cells; (c) the use of PPAR ligands that exhibit PPAR-independent effects (36, 37); and (d) the use of commercial immunoreagents that cross-react with PPAR
(50 kDa), PPAR
(54 kDa), and/or PPAR
(52 kDa).4 Herein, our experiments provide a clear determination that PPAR
induces cell proliferation through a novel cyclin E1–dependent mechanism in normal human cells that predominantly express PPAR
.
Our experiments indicate unappreciated functions for PPAR
and cyclin E1 in thyroid physiology and show that PPAR
is up-regulated in many thyroid tumors including papillary carcinoma, the most common thyroid cancer. In fact, all classes of thyroid tumors in our study exhibited elevated mean levels of PPAR
and increased mean expression of Ki67, an in situ marker of cell proliferation. Thus, PPAR
promoted thyroid cell proliferation in vitro and was associated with increased proliferation in thyroid tumors in vivo. Most previous studies have shown increased cyclin E levels in transformed thyroid cells (38) and thyroid carcinoma tissues (39–43). The deregulation of the PPAR
-cyclin E1 signaling axis is likely important in thyroid tumors because (a) both PPAR
and cyclin E1 control thyroid cell proliferation, (b) cyclin E is rate-limiting in the G1-S transition in many cell types (44), (c) deregulated expression of cyclin E induces chromosome instability (45), and (d) the loss of cyclin E in knockout mice confers a resistance to oncogenic transformation (25). Furthermore, the expression of cyclin E is abnormal in some human breast carcinomas (46) and PPAR
ligand has been shown to change the histology and growth rate of breast carcinomas in a mouse tumor model (47). Thus, PPAR
-cyclin E1 signaling may be important in thyroid, breast, and other carcinomas.
We previously identified, in a subset of thyroid follicular carcinomas, a family of mutant PPAR
gene fusions (20, 21). The early expression (20) and biological activities (21, 48) of the encoded PPAR
fusion proteins are consistent with an important role in the pathogenesis of these thyroid cancers. Interestingly, the PPAR
fusion proteins induce proliferation in primary thyroid cells without an apparent increase in cyclin E1.4 In addition, wild-type PPAR
has little ability to stimulate proliferation in normal thyroid cells, in sharp contrast to PPAR
(Figs. 3 and 4). These observations suggest that PPAR
and PPAR
exhibit distinct mechanisms in cell proliferation and neoplasia in the thyroid gland, a systemic endocrine regulator of growth and metabolism.
The thyroid has proven to be a valuable model to determine the mechanisms of nuclear receptors and altered signal transduction in epithelial cells and tumors. Here, we have shown that the expression of PPAR
is up-regulated in thyroid cells by serum, TSH, or EGF mitogenic signals. TSH stimulates both proliferation and differentiation in thyroid cells by activation of cyclic AMP and pKa (24). EGF stimulates proliferation and inhibits differentiation in thyroid cells by activation of MEK/ERK (24). MEK/ERK are activated constitutively by mutations in subsets of follicular thyroid adenomas, follicular carcinomas, papillary carcinomas, and anaplastic/poorly differentiated thyroid carcinomas (49–52). In fact, 80% of papillary carcinomas possess RET, NTRK1, BRAF, or RAS mutations that induce MEK/ERK signaling. Our strong correlation between mean PPAR
expression and mean Ki67 expression in these thyroid tumors and normal thyroid cells (R = 1; P = 0.01667) supports a fundamental mechanistic connection between PPAR
and MEK/ERK signaling (53) that requires additional investigation.
Our experiments support a model in which PPAR
induces cyclin E1 and cell proliferation depending on growth factor and lipid ligands in the local environment. Growth factors up-regulate the expression of PPAR
during cell proliferation and PPAR
ligands modulate the proliferation response. This model provides an explanation for the varied effects of PPAR
activation in cell and tumor models—the requisite growth factor and/or ligand signals that produce a robust PPAR
proliferation response may not be present in each case. Our data also argue that new selective antagonists for PPAR
(54) should be investigated for antitumorigenic properties in preclinical and perhaps clinical models. The overall findings indicate that a coordinated interplay between PPAR
, PPAR
, lipid ligands, and growth factors regulate thyroid cell proliferation and is altered by different PPAR mechanisms in different thyroid carcinomas.
 |
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
|
|---|
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
 |
Acknowledgments
|
|---|
Grant support: National Cancer Institute grant CA75425 and the Louis Block Fund of the University of Chicago.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
We thank Drs. Don Steiner, Graham Bell, and Sam Refetoff for sharing laboratory equipment, and Pablo Michalewicz for technical assistance.
 |
Footnotes
|
|---|
Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Research Online (http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/).
3 http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/ 
4 Unpublished data. 
Received 3/ 6/08.
Revised 6/ 2/08.
Accepted 6/ 5/08.
 |
References
|
|---|
- Evans RM, Barish GD, Wang YX. PPARs and the complex journey to obesity. Nat Med 2004;10:355–61.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Rosen ED, Spiegelman BM. PPAR
: a nuclear regulator of metabolism, differentiation, and cell growth. J Biol Chem 2001;276:37731–4.[Free Full Text] - Bookout AL, Jeong Y, Downes M, et al. Anatomical profiling of nuclear receptor expression reveals a hierarchical transcriptional network. Cell 2006;126:789–99.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Issemann I, Prince RA, Tugwood JD, et al. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor:retinoid X receptor heterodimer is activated by fatty acids and fibrate hypolipidaemic drugs. J Mol Endocrinol 1993;11:37–47.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Barish GD, Evans RM. PPARs and LXRs: Atherosclerosis goes nuclear. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2004;15:158–65.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Rosen ED, Spiegelman BM. Molecular regulation of adipogenesis. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2000;16:145–71.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Lehmann JM, Moore LB, Smith-Oliver TA, et al. An antidiabetic thiazolidinedione is a high affinity ligand for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
(PPAR
). J Biol Chem 1995;270:12953–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Tanaka T, Yamamoto J, Iwasaki S, et al. Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
induces fatty acid β-oxidation in skeletal muscle and attenuates metabolic syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:15924–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Schuler M, Ali F, Chambon C, et al. PGC1
expression is controlled in skeletal muscles by PPARβ, whose ablation results in fiber-type switching, obesity, and type 2 diabetes. Cell Metab 2006;4:407–14.[CrossRef][Medline] - Peters JM, Lee SS, Li W, et al. Growth, adipose, brain, and skin alterations resulting from targeted disruption of the mouse peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor β(
). Mol Cell Biol 2000;20:5119–28.[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Oliver WR, Jr., Shenk JL, Snaith MR, et al. A selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
agonist promotes reverse cholesterol transport. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001;98:5306–11.[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Sprecher DL, Massien C, Pearce G, et al. Triglyceride:high-density lipoprotein cholesterol effects in healthy subjects administered a peroxisome proliferator activated receptor
agonist. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2007;27:359–65.[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Lee SS, Pineau T, Drago J, et al. Targeted disruption of the
isoform of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gene in mice results in abolishment of the pleiotropic effects of peroxisome proliferators. Mol Cell Biol 1995;15:3012–22.[Abstract] - Park BH, Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW. Genetic disruption of PPAR
decreases the tumorigenicity of human colon cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001;98:2598–603.[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Harman FS, Nicol CJ, Marin HE, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-
attenuates colon carcinogenesis. Nat Med 2004;10:481–3.[CrossRef][Medline] - Girnun GD, Smith WM, Drori S, et al. APC-dependent suppression of colon carcinogenesis by ppar
. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99:13771–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Saez E, Tontonoz P, Nelson MC, et al. Activators of the nuclear receptor PPAR
enhance colon polyp formation. Nat Med 1998;4:1058–61.[CrossRef][Medline] - Gupta RA, Wang D, Katkuri S, et al. Activation of nuclear hormone receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-
accelerates intestinal adenoma growth. Nat Med 2004;10:245–7.[CrossRef][Medline] - Sarraf P, Mueller E, Smith WM, et al. Loss-of-function mutations in PPAR
associated with human colon cancer. Mol Cell 1999;3:799–804.[CrossRef][Medline] - French CA, Alexander EK, Cibas ES, et al. Genetic and biological subgroups of low-stage follicular thyroid cancer. Am J Pathol 2003;162:1053–60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kroll TG, Sarraf P, Pecciarini L, et al. PAX8-1 fusion oncogene in human thyroid carcinoma [corrected]. Science 2000;289:1357–60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Williams DW, Wynford-Thomas D. Human thyroid epithelial cells. Methods Mol Biol 1997;75:163–72.[Medline]
- Reiner A, Neumeister B, Spona J, et al. Immunocytochemical localization of estrogen and progesterone receptor and prognosis in human primary breast cancer. Cancer Res 1990;50:7057–61.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kimura T, Van Keymeulen A, Golstein J, et al. Regulation of thyroid cell proliferation by TSH and other factors: a critical evaluation of in vitro models. Endocr Rev 2001;22:631–56.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Geng Y, Yu Q, Sicinska E, et al. Cyclin E ablation in the mouse. Cell 2003;114:431–43.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Barak Y, Liao D, He W, et al. Effects of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
on placentation, adiposity, and colorectal cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99:303–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Zhang J, Fu M, Zhu X, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
is up-regulated during vascular lesion formation and promotes post-confluent cell proliferation in vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem 2002;277:11505–12.[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Wang D, Wang H, Guo Y, et al. Crosstalk between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
and VEGF stimulates cancer progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006;103:19069–74.[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Xu L, Han C, Wu T. A novel positive feedback loop between peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-
and prostaglandin E2 signaling pathways for human cholangiocarcinoma cell growth. J Biol Chem 2006;281:33982–96.[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Jehl-Pietri C, Bastie C, Gillot I, et al. Peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor
mediates the effects of long-chain fatty acids on post-confluent cell proliferation. Biochem J 2000;350 Pt 1:93–8.[CrossRef][Medline] - Hansen JB, Zhang H, Rasmussen TH, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
(PPAR
)-mediated regulation of preadipocyte proliferation and gene expression is dependent on cAMP signaling. J Biol Chem 2001;276:3175–82.[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Burdick AD, Bility MT, Girroir EE, et al. Ligand activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-β/
(PPARβ/
) inhibits cell growth of human n/tert-1 keratinocytes. Cell Signal 2007;19:1163–71.[CrossRef][Medline] - Kim DJ, Bility MT, Billin AN, et al. Pparβ/
selectively induces differentiation and inhibits cell proliferation. Cell Death Differ 2006;13:53–60.[CrossRef][Medline] - Sabatino L, Casamassimi A, Peluso G, et al. A novel peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
isoform with dominant negative activity generated by alternative splicing. J Biol Chem 2005;280:26517–25.[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Shi Y, Hon M, Evans RM. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
, an integrator of transcriptional repression and nuclear receptor signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99:2613–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Palakurthi SS, Aktas H, Grubissich LM, et al. Anticancer effects of thiazolidinediones are independent of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
and mediated by inhibition of translation initiation. Cancer Res 2001;61:6213–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Baek SJ, Wilson LC, Hsi LC, et al. Troglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
(PPAR
) ligand, selectively induces the early growth response-1 gene independently of PPAR
. A novel mechanism for its anti-tumorigenic activity. J Biol Chem 2003;278:5845–53.[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Lazzereschi D, Sambuco L, Carnovale Scalzo C, et al. Cyclin D1 and cyclin E expression in malignant thyroid cells and in human thyroid carcinomas. Int J Cancer 1998;76:806–11.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Pickett CA, Agoff SN, Widman TJ, et al. Altered expression of cyclins and cell cycle inhibitors in papillary thyroid cancer: prognostic implications. Thyroid 2005;15:461–73.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Brzezinski J, Migodzinski A, Toczek A, et al. Patterns of cyclin E, retinoblastoma protein, and p21cip1/waf1 immunostaining in the oncogenesis of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:1037–43.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Brzezinski J, Migodzinski A, Gosek A, et al. Cyclin E expression in papillary thyroid carcinoma: relation to staging. Int J Cancer 2004;109:102–5.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Melck A, Masoudi H, Griffith OL, et al. Cell cycle regulators show diagnostic and prognostic utility for differentiated thyroid cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14:3403–11.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Wiseman SM, Masoudi H, Niblock P, et al. Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma: expression profile of targets for therapy offers new insights for disease treatment. Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14:719–29.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Duronio RJ, O'Farrell PH. Developmental control of the G1 to S transition in drosophila: cyclin E is a limiting downstream target of E2f. Genes Dev 1995;9:1456–68.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Spruck CH, Won KA, Reed SI. Deregulated cyclin E induces chromosome instability. Nature 1999;401:297–300.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Keyomarsi K, Tucker SL, Buchholz TA, et al. Cyclin E and survival in patients with breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1566–75.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Yin Y, Russell RG, Dettin LE, et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor
and
agonists differentially alter tumor differentiation and progression during mammary carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 2005;65:3950–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Powell J, Wang X, Allard B, et al. The PAX8/PPAR
fusion oncoprotein transforms immortalized human thyrocytes through a mechanism probably involving wild-type PPAR
inhibition. Oncogene 2004;23:3634–41.[CrossRef][Medline] - Zhu Z, Gandhi M, Nikiforova MN, et al. Molecular profile and clinical-pathologic features of the follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma. An unusually high prevalence of RAS mutations. Am J Clin Pathol 2003;120:71–7.[CrossRef][Medline]
- Santoro M, Carlomagno F, Hay ID, et al. Ret oncogene activation in human thyroid neoplasms is restricted to the papillary cancer subtype. J Clin Invest 1992;89:1517–22.[Medline]
- Kimura ET, Nikiforova MN, Zhu Z, et al. High prevalence of BRAF mutations in thyroid cancer: genetic evidence for constitutive activation of theret/ptc-ras-braf signaling pathway in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Cancer Res 2003;63:1454–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Bongarzone I, Pierotti MA, Monzini N, et al. High frequency of activation of tyrosine kinase oncogenes in human papillary thyroid carcinoma. Oncogene 1989;4:1457–62.[Medline]
- Shao J, Sheng H, DuBois RN. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors modulate k-ras-mediated transformation of intestinal epithelial cells. Cancer Res 2002;62:3282–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Shearer BG, Steger DJ, Way JM, et al. Identification and characterization of a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {β}/{
} (NR1C2) antagonist. Mol Endocrinol 2008;22:523–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Kwak, I. Hwang, J. H. Kim, M. Y. Kim, J. S. Yang, and S. Jeong
Modulation of transcription by the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {delta}-binding RNA aptamer in colon cancer cells
Mol. Cancer Ther.,
September 1, 2009;
8(9):
2664 - 2673.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|