| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Molecular Biology, Pathobiology, and Genetics |
1 Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata, Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata-Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Laboratorio di Oncologia Molecolare, Laboratorio di Allergologia Clinica e Sperimentale, III Divisione Dermatologica, Laboratorio di Patologia Vascolare and Laboratorio di Istopatologia and 2 Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini, Unità Operativa di Anatomia Patologica, Rome, Italy; and 3 Ospedale S.Bortolo, Unità Operativa di Anatomia Patologica, Vicenza, Italy
Requests for reprints: Giandomenico Russo, Laboratorio Oncologia Molecolare Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata-Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Via dei Monti dei Creta 104, 00167, Rome, Italy. Phone: 39-06-66462433; Fax: 39-06-66462430; E-mail: russo{at}idi.it.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In these last years, a number of studies have characterized the circulating neoplastic T lymphocytes of SS as CD45RO+,CCR4+CD26-CD27+CCR7+ cells (3–7). This immunophenotype resembles that observed for central memory T (TCM) lymphocytes (8), and thus, as already proposed (6, 9), SS cells might represent a neoplastic expansion of this T lymphocytes subset. The mechanisms responsible for skin localization of these neoplastic cells are only partially disclosed: they express adhesion molecules such as cutaneous lymphocyte antigen that initiates skin homing by mediating E-selectin–dependent tethering, rolling, and transmigration within cutaneous venules (10).
Chemokines, by interacting with their specific receptors, are crucial regulators of cell chemotaxis/mobilization and homing to tissues. They play pivotal roles both in physiologic and pathologic conditions such as inflammation, tumor cell growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis (11), exerting multiple cell functions including cell locomotion, proliferation, and apoptosis (12). Furthermore, they represent key molecules involved in lymphocyte mobilization to and from the skin (10). Chemokines constitute a redundant and promiscuous system, where many receptors are able to bind to more than one ligand, and many chemokines are able to bind multiple receptors. An important control mechanism of this complex system is represented by posttranslational regulation involving the storage, release, and presentation of chemokines (13), their structure modification by proteases (14, 15) or by homodimeric (16) and heterodimeric complex formation (17, 18). Recent studies have already showed that chemokines are strongly involved in MF and SS pathogenesis and neoplastic cell homing to the skin (4–7, 19–22).
Here, we show, for the first time, that the homeostatic chemokine CXCL13 is up-regulated in SS, being highly expressed not only at skin and lymph node level but also in the plasma of SS patients. Furthermore, we observed a significant increase of the chemotaxis of CCR7+ SS cells when CXCL13 is added to CCL19 or CCL21, the lymphoid chemokines that exert their role controlling leukocytes trafficking during immune responses (23). Finally, we show that the CCR7 receptor neutralization strongly reduced the migration response of malignant T lymphocytes to CCL19 and CCL21 used alone or in the presence of CXCL13.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Cell lines. Raji cell line, from American Type Culture Collection (CCL-18), derived from peripheral blood of a patient affected by Burkitt lymphoma and HT-1080 (CCL-121) established from human fibrosarcoma cells were grown in complete RPMI 1640 (Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies).
Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR. Total RNA was extracted using Trizol (Life Technologies) and cDNA was generated by SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies) following manufacturer's instructions. Primers pairs are shown in Supplementary Table S1; quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed with a SYBR Green I dye chemistry and AmpliTaq Gold DNA Polymerase on ABI PRISM 7000 machine (Applied-Biosystems). Quantitative gene expression were analyzed by the
CT method as previously described (24).
Flow cytometry. SS samples showed a neoplastic clonal expansion from 45% to 99% as shown by the detection of a dominant TCR-Vβ rearrangement by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis (Table 1). To analyze CCR7, CXCR3, and CXCR5 chemokine receptor expression, we followed the procedure already described (5). Antibodies used were purchased from (Becton Dickinson).
Intracellular CXCL13 expression was also evaluated by FACS analysis. Briefly, PBMCs from 4 SS, 2 MF patients, and 4 HC were fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized in 0.1% Triton-X in PBS. Cells stained with unconjugated mouse anti-human CXCL13 antibody (R&D) at 1 µg/mL at room temperature for 30 min or with isotype-matched control Ab (Becton Dickinson) followed by FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Becton Dickinson). To evaluate the coexpression of CXCL13 and CCR7 within CD4+ neoplastic and HLs, we performed a three-color flow cytometry with allophycocyanine-conjugated mouse anti-CD4 (Becton Dickinson) and phycoerythrin-conjugated mouse anti-CCR7 (R&D) monoclonal antibodies (mAb) and analyzed on FACS Aria Instrument (Becton Dickinson) using Diva software.
Immunohistochemistry. Paraffin-embedded skin tissues from SS (n = 16) and MF patients (n = 14) and metastatic lymph-nodes (SS, n = 4; MF, n = 2) were selected from the files of IDI Pathology. Pathologic specimens were classified according to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer classification (1, 2).
CXCL13 and CCL21 antigens were retrieved in citrate buffer at pH 6.0 (Dako) by incubating them in a bath at 96°C for 30 min and by microwave at 750 Watts for 10 min, respectively. A total of 30 skin and 6 lymph node biopsies from SS/MF were incubated overnight at +4°C with goat polyclonal anti-CXCL13 Ab (R&D) at 5 µg/mL. A total of 18 skin and 6 lymph node biopsies from SS/MF were incubated overnight at +4°C with polyconal goat anti-human CCL21 Ab (R&D) at 12.5 µg/mL. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed following the procedures already described in (5). Neoplastic T lymphocytes were recognized in the histopathologic sections by morphologic features.
ELISA. Plasmatic CXCL13 level was determined using specific Quantikine ELISA kits (R&D) according to the manufacturer's instructions. CXCL13 was measured in frozen plasma of the above described SS, MF, T-PLL patients, and HC. In 4 of the 14 SS patients, we had samples at different follow-up (n = 12). Totally, in SS, we measured CXCL13 concentration in 9 plasma at onset, 6 plasma after 1 y, and 11 plasma at 3 y postdiagnosis. Absorbances were measured at 450 nm by microplate reader (Bio-Rad). Protein level was calculated from a standard curve generated by a curve-fitting program. All samples were analyzed in duplicates.
Chemotaxis. Chemotaxis was performed in 24-well Transwell inserts with 5-µm pore-size filters (Corning Costar) as previously described (5). For CXCL13 functional studies, Raji cells were chemoattracted by plasma of 4 HC and 4 SS patients diluted 1:25 in migration medium (MM). Response specificity was evaluated by preincubating Raji cells with an anti-CXCR5 neutralizing Ab (R&D) or an isotype-matched negative control (Becton Dickinson) for 15 min before the assay. After 90 min, migrated cells were counted by a hemocytometer. Migration responses of Raji cells to increasing concentrations of human recombinant (rh) CXCL13 (from 0.01–500 ng/mL) were also evaluated. Results shown as MIs represent the ratio between the anti-CXCR5 or IgG1-treated cells, or untreated cells, able to migrate in response to plasma or rhCXCL13, and the cells migrated in response to MM.
For dose-response studies, PBMCs from 3 SS patients were allowed to migrate to rhCCL19 and rhCCL21 (R&D). Chemokines at 10, 100, 300, 500, 750, and 1,000 ng/mL were added to the lower chamber.
For synergistic studies, PBMCs from 7 SS patients and 6 HC were allowed to migrate in response to either rhCXCL13 (1.5 µg/mL), rhCCL19 (750 ng/mL), or rhCCL21 (750 ng/mL; R&D). Furthermore, the response to rhCCL19 or rhCCL21 was evaluated also in the presence of CXCL13 at 1.5 µg/mL. For inhibition studies, PBMCs isolated from 5 patients and from 5 HC were preincubated with 1 µg/mL of anti-CCR7 neutralizing Ab (R&D) or with an irrelevant murine isotype-matched IgG1. After 15 min at 37°C, cells were placed in the upper chamber and allowed to migrate for 2 h at 37°C in response to chemoattractants.
Migrated PBMCs were costained by phycoerythrin-conjugated mouse anti-CD4 and, for neoplastic samples, also by FITC-conjugated mouse-specific anti-Vβ mAbs. CD4+Vβ+ neoplastic and CD4+ HLs were counted by FACScan for 60 s at a flow rate of 60 mL/min, as described (25).
Adhesion assays. Four SS patients were analyzed by adhesion assay. Briefly, 105 PBMCs from SS individuals untreated or stimulated as described in (Fig. 4C) were plated on 0.2% gelatin-coated (Sigma Aldrich Biochemicals) 96-well tissue culture plates and allowed to adhere for 30 min at 37°C. Cell adhesion was quantified by staining with 0.5% toluidine blue as previously described (26).
|
Statistical analysis. Results are expressed as mean ± SD or SE. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t test or ANOVA.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
As CXCL13 resulted to be up-regulated in our Affymetrix data, we validated the expression of CXCL13, at RNA level (qRT-PCR) and at protein level (FACS and IHC). As shown in Fig. 1A , qRT-PCR results, represented as mean expression values, show a statistical significant difference of CXCL13 expression (P = 0.001). In particular, the analysis of CXCL13 showed high level of expression of this chemokine in all SS individuals analyzed: when compared with controls, 7 of 11 (64%) showed a fold increase (FI) ranging from 121 to 2,320; 3 of 11 (27%) showed a FI close to 100; and only 1 out 11 (8%) showed a small FI of 3 (Table 1).
|
To verify whether CXCL13 was also expressed by skin-infiltrating neoplastic T lymphocytes, we performed an IHC analysis on 16 skin and 4 lymph node biopsies from SS patients and 14 skin and 2 lymph node biopsies from MF patients at different stages of disease (from Ia to III), as well as in normal and inflamed skin control samples. CXCL13 immunoreactivity was detected in 13 of 16 (81%) of SS and in 4 of 14 (28%) of MF cases studied. In substantial agreement with previously described data (28), we found that CXCL13 is moderately expressed by endothelial cells of healthy, inflamed, and neoplastic skin (data not shown). In particular, in the SS samples, we observed that 7 of 16 cases (44%) strongly expressed CXCL13 in almost the totality of neoplastic lymphocytes infiltrating the skin, often exhibiting a dot-like immunostaining (Fig. 1D and F). Interestingly, we frequently observed that the CXCL13 positivity is stronger in dermic neoplastic lymphocytes than in those present in the epidermis (Fig. 1E). In 6 of 16 cases (37%), we detected a CXCL13 positivity associated with 5% to 30% of malignant lymphocytes, whereas the remaining 3 of 16 cases (19%) were consistently negative.
On the contrary, in the MF samples analyzed, only 2 of 14 cases (14%) showed a strong CXCL13 immunostaining of the neoplastic lymphocytes. Furthermore, 2 of 14 cases (14%) displayed a CXCL13 immunoreactivity confined to scattered skin neoplastic lymphocytes with a positivity from moderate to strong (Fig. 1G). In the remaining 10 of 14 cases (71%), we did not detect any CXCL13 immunoreactivity associated with malignant cells.
The IHC analyses performed on healthy reactive, SS, and MF lymph node sections revealed, as previously shown (29), a strong CXCL13 positivity of the endothelial and follicular dendritic cells (Fig. 1H). Furthermore, in 4 of 4 SS lymph nodes (100%), we observed a strong dot-like immunoreactivity for this chemokine associated with infiltrating SS neoplastic lymphocytes (Fig. 1H). On the contrary, in two of MF lymph nodes studied (0%), no infiltrating malignant cells exhibited a CXCL13 immunoreactivity, whereas a CXCL13 expression was observable in rare dendritic cells/hystiocytes cells of paracortex (Fig. 1I).
Expression analysis of known CXCL13 receptors (CXCR5 and CXCR3) and of potential interacting chemokines (CCL19 and CCL21) in SS cells. It is widely known that CXCR5 is the main CXCL13 receptor (30) and CXCR3 is a receptor potentially able to bind CXCL13 (31). The expression of these two molecules was evaluated by qRT-PCR and FACS analysis in circulating SS cells (Fig. 1A; Table 1). As shown in Table 1, we observed at mRNA level, a slight increase of these two receptors (P
0.02), whereas the expression at protein level was almost absent; in fact, CXCR5+ SS cells were almost undetectable (n = 14) as well as the majority of CXCR3+ SS cells (n = 11) with the exception of only 2 patients who showed 24% and 50%, respectively, of CXCR3+cells within the circulating neoplastic population. These results are in agreement with those found in the literature reviewed in (9).
In the same way, we analyzed the expression of CCL19 and CCL21 by qRT-PCR because these chemokines are able to form complexes with CXCL13 that bind CCR7 (32), a receptor expressed on the majority of SS cells (73% ± 23%). Also, these chemokines were not significantly augmented in circulating SS cells (Fig. 1A; Table 1). In conclusion, among all these chemokines and chemokine receptors, only CXCL13 was really overexpressed in circulating SS cells.
CXCL13 is highly measurable in plasma of SS patients and is functionally active. We also measured by ELISA, the plasmatic concentration of this chemokine in patients affected by SS, MF, T-PLL, and HC as described in Materials and Methods section. Interestingly, CXCL13 concentration in SS patients was 800.24 ± 89.3 pg/mL (n = 26 including onset and disease progression), whereas the CXCL13 concentration in MF (n = 10), T-PLL (n = 3), and HC (n = 5) was 130 ± 128, 200 ± 42, and 12.8 ± 10 pg/mL, respectively. The comparison of SS samples with controls, MF, or T-PLL specimens showed in all cases statistical significance (P
0.002). A statistical difference (P
0.05) was also observed comparing MF or T-PLL with controls (Fig. 2A
). Furthermore, to establish if the higher levels of CXCL13 observed in SS were correlated to tumor progression, we analyzed plasma of SS patients at the onset (0–3 months; n = 9) and at more advanced stages of disease (up to 36 months; n = 11). The comparison of these two groups revealed a significant increase of CXCL13 during the later phases of SS, increasing from 548 to 1,107 pg/mL (P = 0,02; Fig. 2B). Taken together, these results indicates that CXCL13 is augmented in all tumor samples analyzed, and its increment seems more closely related to SS and, particularly, to disease progression.
|
CXCL13 treatment enhances CCL19- or CCL21-induced chemotaxis of both CD4+ neoplastic and HLs. Next, we asked if other autocrine mechanisms could act on SS cells, through CCL19 and CCL21, as mentioned above. To address this point, we investigated whether CXCL13 might functionally enhance the CCL19- and/or CCL21-induced in vitro chemotaxis of CCR7+SS cells.
Dose-response migration assays performed on PBMCs of 3 SS patients toward CXCL13, CCL19, and CCL21 used alone (from 10–1,000 ng/mL) showed bell-shaped curves peaking at 750 ng/mL for both CCL19 and CCL21 (Fig. 3A ). The addition of 1.5 µg/mL CXCL13 to 750 ng/mL CCL19 or CCL21 determined a synergistic effect on CCL19- or CCL21-induced chemotactic responses. For CCL19, an increase of 3.5-fold for SS cells (P = 0.01) and 2-fold for HL (P = 0.02) was observed (Fig. 4B ). A similar effect was also noted when CXCL13 was added to CCL21: an increase of 2.2-fold for SS cells (P = 0.03) and 2.5-fold for HL (P = 0.009) was detected (Fig. 3B). Synergistic effects were also observed in SS using rhCXCL13, at 750 ng/mL, in combination with CCL19 and CCL21, with 2.6 and 1.5 FI, respectively (data not shown).
|
The results obtained strongly suggest that CXCL13 might act, in a synergistic manner, with CCL19 and CCL21 in both pathologic- and physiologic-inducing chemotaxis.
CXCL13, CCL21, and CCL19, used alone or in combination, modulate adhesion and metalloproatease secretion of SS cells. To better understand which other mechanisms were affected by these interactions we assayed whether CXCL13, CCL21 and CCL19 could affect SS cell adhesion. Adhesion assay was performed using gelatin as matrix as adherence of PBMCs on fibronectin and collagen type I was very poor (data not shown).
PBMCs adherence to gelatin significantly decreased in the presence of CCL21 or CCL19 (Fig. 3C), whereas the addition of CXCL13 restored PBMCs adhesiveness. Furthermore, PBMCs from 4 SS patients were analyzed for MMP secretion by gelatin zymography in the presence of chemokines. Results obtained indicated that, as observed for HT-1080 cell line used as positive control, untreated and chemokine-treated PBMCs contained proform and active forms for MMP-9 and the proenzyme form of MMP-2 (Fig. 3D). Compared with untreated PBMCs, CXCL13, CCL19, and CXCL13+CCL19 treatments significantly decreased the level of total (proforms+active forms) and the active form of MMP-9 (Fig. 3D).
At last, experiments were performed to investigate whether chemokine treatment could also affect the survival of SS cells. Results obtained staining PBMCs with Annexin V and propidium iodide, by FACS analysis, revealed no significant difference, in term of apoptosis, between untreated and chemokine stimulated PBMCs (data not shown).
CCR7 blockade by neutralizing Ab strongly decreased the synergistic chemotactic response induced by CXCL13. To determine whether CCL19 and CCL21 used alone or in combination with CXCL13 act via CCR7, we tested the ability of an anti-CCR7 Ab to block the in vitro migration of SS cells and HL in response to these chemokines.
Treatment with anti-CCR7 mAb strongly reduced the SS cell migration induced by CCL19 alone by 67% (P
005) and that obtained by CCL19 plus CXCL13 by 82% (P = 0.05). CCR7 blockade produced, in the same conditions, a chemotactic ability reduction of 30% and 74%, respectively (P = 0.05), of HL (Fig. 4). Similar results, with decreases of 61% and 64% (P
0.05) of SS cells, 31% and 29% of HL chemotaxis were also observed using as chemoattractants CCL21 and CCL21 plus CXCL13, respectively (Fig. 4).
These results indicate that the CCR7 neutralization was effective to reduce the migration of SS cells as well as HL toward CCL19 and CCL21 in absence or presence of CXCL13.
CCL21, a chemokine able to synergize with CXCL13, is expressed in skin and lymph nodes of SS and MF patients. Finally, we sought to determine if CCL19 and/or CCL21 were produced in vivo in skin and lymph nodes of SS/MF patients. We analyzed their expression by IHC in 10 skin and 4 lymph node sections of SS individuals and 8 skin and 2 lymph node biopsies derived from MF patients. Although we were able to stain cells with anti-CCL21 Ab, the anti-CCL19 Ab did not yield satisfying results because of high background on skin sections. Coherently with CCL21 qRT-PCR results (Fig. 1A; Table 1), we did not observe significant CCL21 positivity associated with neoplastic skin infiltrating T lymphocytes of SS/MF biopsies, but we observed a strong CCL21 immunostaining associated with endothelial cells in 6 of 10 SS (60%) and 4 of 8 MF skin cases (50%; Fig. 5A and B ). We found a strong expression of CCL21 associated to endothelial venules and dendritic cells of paracortical zone in 6 of 6 (100%) lymph nodes from SS/MF studied (Fig. 5C and D), in agreement to previous study (33) showing the expression of this chemokine by these cells in lymphoid districts in physiologic conditions.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, we report that CXCL13 is strongly detectable in skin lesions and lymph nodes, measurable at high level in plasma of SS patients, and functionally active. Because SS cells do not express, at the protein level, the specific (CXCR5) and the potential (CXCR3) receptors for CXCL13 and these cells are not able to migrate in response to rhCXCL13, we wondered if CXCL13 could have a role in SS biology through different molecule(s). Interestingly, CXCL13 is able to synergize with CCL19 and CCL21, the selective CCR7 agonists that play crucial roles in lymph node homing (23, 32). As CCR7 is present at high levels in SS cells (3–6), we found in vivo that CCL21 is present in skin and lymph node of both SS and MF, and, in vitro, that the addition of CXCL13 to CCL19 and CCL21 enhances chemotaxis of SS cells, and finally, that this response is strongly reduced by CCR7 receptor neutralization. All together, these findings suggest that CXCL13 chemokine, coexpressed by CCR7 SS cells, might act as autocrine motility factor involved in lymph node and skin homing of these malignant cells.
Our findings might have direct clinical relevance: plasmatic concentration and expression of CXCL13 varies not only within CTCLs (MF and SS) but also during SS progression. This might indicate that CXCL13 detection could become an additional diagnostic tool for SS. For example, increasing amounts of this chemokine in plasma could be indicative of the disease progression, whereas CXCL13 immunostaining in skin and lymph node could also represent an additional way to recognize neoplastic T lymphocytes in skin lesions.
MF and SS are clinical entities showing many similarities and differences and are referred to have an indolent and severe clinical outcome, respectively: the early stages of MF are characterized by cellular accumulation in the skin, whereas terminal (tumoral) stages of MF and SS show additional cellular colonization of lymph nodes and peripheral blood (1, 2). The selectivity of metastasis for specific districts may depend on a variety of factors (37, 38) including the ability of neoplastic cells to home to selected organs by cell migration by means of specific chemoattractants (39). There is a growing body of evidence that chemokines and their receptors might play a role in different and progressive stages of CTCLs. Several of these factors are commonly found in progressive stages of MF and SS, such as CCR4/TARC (4, 21, 40), CXCR4/CXCL12 (5, 21), and CCR10/CCL27 (6, 19, 41). Conversely, the expression of other chemokines is more strictly correlated to clinical subtypes. One example is represented by CXCR3, a molecule mainly associated with epidermotropic neoplastic lymphocytes of early stage lesions of MF (22).
MF is characterized by an abundant tumor cells infiltration both in epidermis and dermis, whereas SS shows a tumoral infiltration mainly in dermis (2, 42). In this study, we report that the expression of CXCL13 and CCL21 is associated with malignant T lymphocytes and vessels, respectively, in the dermis of SS patients. Therefore, these findings suggest that dermis might represent a favorable environment for the interaction in vivo between these chemokines. This interaction could be of particular relevance also for lymph node homing because CCL19/21 are constitutively expressed in these tissues and CXCL13 is carried by CCR7+ SS cells. Thus, similarly to central memory (CM) T-lymphocytes, known to be able to recirculate among peripheral tissues, blood, and via CCR7 to lymph nodes (8), SS cells, a category of malignant CD45RO+,CCR4+CD26-CD27+CCR7+CM T lymphocytes (3–7) that for chemokine receptors expression fits in pre-TH2 effector CM subset (8) and here described also as CXCL13+, might be attracted to lymph nodes by CCL19/21 gradients mainly generated by high endothelial venules. Entrance into this favorable environment could lead to the exposure of SS cells to survival signals provided, for example, by lymphoid chemokines stimulations or mediated through direct contact between SS cells and cells, as the growth of circulating SS cells is stimulated by a direct contact with immature dendritic cells (43). Therefore, coherently with the data reported by Mueller and colleagues (36), the high level of CXCL13 observed in lymph node of SS patients might serve to increase cellularity and maintain the tumor process in situ. This hypothesis seems to be supported by additional molecular studies performed in this study that showed that CXCL13 (used alone or in combination with CCL19 and CCL21) did not affect both survival and adhesion of SS cells, whereas CXCL13 and CXCL13+CCL19 treatments significantly decreased the MMP-9 secretion. All these findings seem to indicate that CXCL13, in combination with CCL19 and CCL21, mainly influence the chemotaxis of SS cells. Our finding that CXCL13 is particularly elevated in the advanced stages of SS is in good agreement with this last observation. Although we did not observe any correlation between CXCL13 levels and the absolute number of circulating neoplastic cells (data not shown), we cannot exclude that the increase of this chemokine is associated to SS progression and/or therapeutic treatments here mainly represented by Extracorporeal-photochemotherapy (ECP) used in combination with IFN
. Furthermore, because MF revealed an increased level of CXCL13, although to a less extent than that observed in SS, either in blood or locally, it would be also of interest to investigate a possible correlation between the expression of CXCL13 and stages of MF.
Several Ab-based therapies have been already successfully used in the treatment of different tumors (44). Previous data from other laboratories (4, 6) and our own laboratory (5) showed that SS cells express high levels of CCR4, CXCR4, and CCR7. Recently, anti-CXCR4 Ab or antagonist peptides and anti-CCR4 Ab have been used with promising results in treatment of non–Hodgkin's lymphomas and T-cell leukemias (45, 46); the observation presented in this study also suggest that the interference of CXCL13 on CCL19/21-CCR7 axis might represent a novel therapeutic target and, similarly to the treatment recently proposed for B-CLL (47), the CCR7 neutralization might impair the migratory ability of SS cells. Experimental data in vivo, e.g., in immunodeficient mice transplanted with human CCR7+ SS cell line where CCR7 would be down-regulated with siRNA would be of great value in assessing the therapeutic potential of anti-CCR7 treatment in SS.
| Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
We thank Dr. Diego Arcelli and Dr. Guido Melillo for help with performing statistical analyses and all the nurse staff of III Clinical Dermatology Unit of the Istituto Dermopatico dell'Immacolata-Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico for collaboration.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received 2/16/08. Revised 5/30/08. Accepted 6/16/08.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and 1β as a native secreted heterodimer. J Biol Chem 2001;276:12404–9.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |