Cancer Research Audrey Hepburn  EMT and Cancer Progression and Treatment
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

Cancer Research 68, 8384, October 15, 2008. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2033
© 2008 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rossi, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Chang, C.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rossi, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Chang, C.-H.

Experimental Therapeutics, Molecular Targets, and Chemical Biology

Novel Designs of Multivalent Anti-CD20 Humanized Antibodies as Improved Lymphoma Therapeutics

Edmund A. Rossi1, David M. Goldenberg3, Thomas M. Cardillo2, Rhona Stein3, Yang Wang2 and Chien-Hsing Chang1,2

1 IBC Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; 2 Immunomedics, Inc., Morris Plains, New Jersey; and 3 Garden State Cancer Center, Center for Molecular Medicine and Immunology, Belleville, New Jersey

Requests for reprints: Chien-Hsing Chang, Immunomedics, Inc., 300 American Road, Morris Plains, NJ 07950. Phone: 973-605-1330, ext. 108; Fax: 973-605-1103; E-mail: kchang{at}immunomedics.com or David M. Goldenberg, Garden State Cancer Center, 520 Belleville Avenue, Belleville, NJ 07109. E-mail: dmg.gscancer{at}att.net.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosure of Potential...
 References
 
Multivalent antibodies, either monospecific or bispecific, may improve the efficacy of current therapeutic interventions involving a single monoclonal antibody (mAb). We have applied the Dock-and-Lock (DNL) method, a new platform technology for the site-specific and covalent assembly of modular components into stably tethered complexes of defined composition, to prepare a hexavalent, anti-CD20 antibody, designated Hex-hA20, which comprises six Fabs with one Fc. We show that Hex-hA20 retains the binding activity of all six Fabs, associates with CD20 in lipid rafts, affects antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, but not complement-dependent cytotoxicity, and inhibits proliferation of Daudi, Raji, and Ramos cells in vitro at subnanomolar concentrations without the need for a cross-linking antibody. In addition, Hex-hA20 induces strong homotypical adhesion and is inefficient in stimulating calcium mobilization. Thus, Hex-hA20 exhibits biological properties attributable to both type I and type II anti-CD20 mAbs, as exemplified by rituximab and tositumomab, respectively. Although Hex-hA20 has a short serum half-life, it shows antitumor efficacy in tumor-bearing mice comparable with veltuzumab at equivalent doses. The versatile DNL method was also applied to generate two other multivalent anti-CD20 antibodies without the Fc region, Tri-hA20 and Tetra-hA20, comprising three and four Fabs of veltuzumab, respectively. Similar to Hex-hA20, these were purified to near homogeneity and shown to have potent antiproliferative activity in vitro, thus indicating the need for clustering three or more CD20 molecules on the cell surface to induce growth inhibition. [Cancer Res 2008;68(20):8384–92]


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosure of Potential...
 References
 
With the approval of rituximab, a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb), in 1997 for the treatment of relapsed or refractory low-grade or follicular non–Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL; ref. 1), a new era in mAb-based therapy of cancer was introduced whereas a profound management change in the treatment of CD20-positive lymphomas occurred. It not only presented a novel modality to treat B-cell malignancies but also provided an impetus to treat autoimmune diseases where B-cell dysregulation is implicated (2). Although only about half of patients with relapsed NHL respond to rituximab, its importance lies in its representing a category of therapeutics, which has a strikingly different toxicity profile than the typical cytotoxic drugs available. Its relative paucity of long-term toxicity and the short-term adverse event profile, being mostly associated with infusion reactions, show no overlap with chemotherapy, thus providing a rational combination of immunotherapy with chemotherapy without enhanced toxicity.

At present, next-generation anti-CD20 mAbs include human and humanized forms, with some claiming enhanced potency by antibody reengineering (1, 35). However, it is still unclear what improvements are required to show better efficacy than rituximab. Predicting on the basis of laboratory results has been difficult, because despite 10 years of clinical use of rituximab and an expansive preclinical literature on the use of anti-CD20 mAbs in lymphoma models in vitro and in vivo, how rituximab or other anti-CD20 mAbs kill lymphoma cells is still being debated (5) among the three mechanisms proposed: complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), and apoptosis or growth inhibition induced by direct signaling.

Dimeric forms of IgG made by genetic engineering (610) or chemical conjugation (11, 12) may become more effective antibodies than their monomeric counterparts as a result of increased valency, as well as enhanced effector functions. For example, a mAb for CD19 or CD20 that has little or no signaling activity was shown to induce growth inhibition or apoptosis when each is converted into an IgG-IgG homodimer (11, 12). Similar observations of attaining signaling activity or exhibiting higher cytotoxicity were reported for recombinantly produced fusion proteins comprising three identical anti-HER2 (13) single-chain Fvs (scFv), four identical anti-CD22 (14, 15) scFvs, or four identical anti-CD20 (16) scFvs. In addition, a dextran-rituximab polymer was found to inhibit the growth of Raji xenografts in mice, whereas the homodimer or monomer of rituximab was ineffective (17). Therefore, we propose that making multivalent or multimeric mAbs of a defined composition and proved homogeneity should be promising for developing more potent anti-CD20 agents, which may also help elucidate the most critical mechanism of action in vivo.

Veltuzumab or hA20 is a complementarity-determined region–grafted, anti-CD20 humanized mAb that exhibits CDC and ADCC in vitro, as well as inhibits cell proliferation and induces apoptosis upon cross-linking with a second antibody (18). Initial clinical studies have shown good safety and efficacy results in NHL patients and confirmed that low doses of veltuzumab are effective and that all doses can be given in shorter infusion times than the approved dose of rituximab (19).

The Dock-and-Lock (DNL) method exploits the dimerization and docking domain (DDD) and the anchoring domain (AD) that are involved in the natural binding between cyclic AMP–dependent protein kinase and A-kinase anchoring proteins (20, 21) as a pair of linkers for specifically docking a DDD-containing module into an AD-containing module, with the resulting binary complex further stabilized covalently by locking with disulfide bonds (22, 23). One distinct advantage of the DNL method, as noted previously (23), is to provide a modular approach for generating multivalent antibodies of monospecificity or bispecificity via site-specific conjugation of two types of recombinantly produced fusion proteins that are derived from the same or different antibodies. Here, we describe a veltuzumab-based hexavalent antibody (Hex-hA20) made by DNL to consist of a bivalent IgG linked to four monovalent Fabs, and the evaluation of its antitumor activity against CD20-expressing human lymphoma cells in vitro and in vivo. The versatile DNL method was also applied to generate two other multivalent anti-CD20 antibodies without the Fc region: Tri-hA20, a trivalent construct composed of three hA20 Fabs, and Tetra-hA20, a tetravalent construct composed of four hA20 Fabs. All three multivalent anti-CD20 antibodies were purified to near homogeneity and shown to retain the binding activity of each constituent Fab. In addition, testing of Tri-hA20 allowed us to establish that clustering three CD20 molecules on the cell surface via antibody binding is sufficient to induce growth inhibition. Schematic diagrams for Hex-IgG, Tri-Fab, Tetra-Fab, and the modules used for building them are shown in Fig. 1 .


Figure 1
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 1. Schematic diagrams representing CH1-AD2-Fab module, CH1-DDD2-Fab module, CH3-AD2-IgG module, Tri-Fab, Tetra-Fab, and Hex-IgG (the DNL structure generated by reacting CH1-DDD2-Fab with CH3-AD2-IgG). Green, variable domains for the heavy (VH) and light (VL) chains; gray, constant domains of the heavy (CH) and light (CL) chains; blue, DDD2 peptides; pink, AD2 peptides.

 

    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosure of Potential...
 References
 
Antibodies, reagents and culture media. Veltuzumab, epratuzumab (hLL2, humanized anti-CD22), labetuzumab (hMN-14, humanized anti-CEACAM5), and WR2, a rat anti-idiotype mAb to veltuzumab, were provided by Immunomedics. Rituximab and tositumomab (murine anti-B1) were obtained from commercial supplies. The purity of rituximab or tositumomab was determined by size-exclusion high-performance liquid chromatography (SE-HPLC) to be >98%. Secondary antibodies were obtained from Jackson Immunoresearch. Mouse anti-human IgM was obtained from SouthernBiotech. Antimouse Gr-1 ascites was kindly supplied by Dr. Myron Czuczman (Roswell Park Cancer Institute). The anti-mouse interleukin 2 (IL-2) receptor mAb, TMβ-1, was purchased from BD Biosciences. All restriction endonucleases and other enzymes were purchased from New England Biolabs. Oligonucleotides were synthesized by Sigma Genosys. PCR reactions were performed using Amplitaq polymerase (Applied Biosystems) and a Perkin-Elmer GeneAmp PCR system 9600. Heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) was purchased from Hyclone. All other cell culture media and supplements were from Invitrogen Life Technologies.

Cell lines. Daudi, Raji, and Ramos were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection. Sp/ESF, a variant of Sp2/0-Ag14 engineered to grow in serum-free medium,4 was used as the host cell for transfection.

Generation of Hex-hA20. The pdHL2 vector has been used to mediate the expression of recombinant IgGs in mammalian hosts (24). A plasmid shuttle vector was produced to facilitate the conversion of any IgG-pdHL2 vector into a CH3-AD2-IgG-pdHL2 vector. The expression vector encoding CH1-DDD2-Fab-hA20 was generated from the CH3-AD2-IgG-hA20-pdHL2 by excising the coding sequence for the CH1-Hinge-CH2-CH3 domains with SacII and EagI and replacing it with a 507-bp sequence encoding CH1-DDD2, which was excised from the C-DDD2-hMN-14-pdHL2 expression vector (22) with the same enzymes. The expression vector CH3-AD2-IgG-hA20-pdHL2 or CH1-DDD2-Fab-hA20-pdHL2, each 30 µg, was linearized by digestion with SalI and transfected into Sp/ESF (2.8 x 106 cells) by electroporation (450 V, 25 µF). The pdHL2 vector contains the gene for dihydrofolate reductase, thus allowing clonal selection, as well as gene amplification, with methotrexate (MTX). After transfection, the cells were plated in 96-well plates and selected in media containing 0.2 µmol/L MTX. Clones were screened for CH3-AD2-IgG-hA20 or CH1-DDD2-Fab-hA20 productivity by a sandwich ELISA using 96-well microtiter plates coated with WR2 to capture the fusion protein, which was detected with horseradish peroxidase–conjugated goat anti-human IgG F(ab')2. Wells giving the highest signal were expanded and ultimately used for production.

CH3-AD2-IgG-hA20 and CH1-DDD2-Fab-hA20 were produced in roller bottles, purified by Protein A (MabSelect, Amersham-Biosciences) and Protein L (CBind L, Fluka), respectively, and stored in PBS. To generate Hex-hA20, a mixture of CH1-DDD2-Fab-hA20 (134 mg) and CH3-AD2-IgG-hA20 (100 mg) was treated with 1 mmol/L reduced glutathione at room temperature for 16 h, followed by 2 mmol/L oxidized glutathione for 24 h, from which Hex-hA20 was purified by Protein A. DNL-20/14 was made similarly by reacting CH3-AD2-IgG-hA20 with CH1-DDD2-Fab-hMN-14 (22).

Generation of Tetra-hA20 and Tri-hA20. Tetra-hA20 was obtained by purifying the tetrameric form of CH1-DDD2-Fab-hA20 over a Superdex-200 column. Tri-hA20 was obtained by linking the dimeric form of CH1-DDD2-Fab-hA20 covalently to CH1-AD2-Fab-hA20, which was produced as described for h679-Fab-AD2 (22).

Molecular size. SE-HPLC was performed on a Beckman System Gold Model 116 with a Bio-Sil SEC 250 column (Bio-Rad) and 0.04 mol/L PBS (pH 6.8) and 1 mmol/L EDTA as the mobile phase.

SDS-PAGE. Reducing and nonreducing SDS-PAGE analyses were performed using 4% to 20% gradient Tris-glycine gels (Cambrex Bio Science).

Mass spectrometry. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry was performed in a sinapinic acid matrix by Scripps Center for Mass Spectrometry.

Competition ELISA. Microtiter plates were coated overnight with veltuzumab at 5 µg/mL and blocked with PBS containing 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1 h. Hex-hA20 and veltuzumab, serially diluted in triplicate, were each mixed with WR2 at 1 nmol/L and added to the coated wells. The bound WR2 was quantified with peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rat IgG and O-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride.

Flow cytometry. Apoptosis, viable cell counting, cell binding, and off-rate measurements were performed by flow cytometry on a Guava PCA (Guava Technologies, Inc.) using the manufacturer's reagents, protocols, and software.

Scatchard analysis. The maximum number of binding sites per cell and the apparent affinity constants were determined by nonlinear regression analysis of the saturation binding data obtained with radio-iodinated samples and Raji cells using Prism software (GraphPad Software, Inc.). Samples were run in triplicate. Immunoreactivity of each radiolabeled preparation was 90% or greater, as measured by binding to WR2.

Cell proliferation assay. The in vitro cytotoxicity was determined using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium (MTS), which is chemically reduced by metabolically active cells into formazan, and the intensity of the resulting color is proportional to the number of living cells.

CDC. Cells were seeded in black 96-well plates (Nunc) at 5 x 104 cells in 50 µL/well and incubated with serial dilutions (concentration range, 3.33 x 10-8 to 2.6 x 10-10 mol/L) of test and control mAbs in the presence of human complement (1:20 final dilution, Quidel Corp.) for 2 h at 37°C and 5% CO2. Viable cells were then quantified using the Vybrant Cell Metabolic Assay Resazurin kit (Invitrogen). Controls included cells treated with 0.25% Triton X-100 (100% lysis) and cells treated with complement alone (background).

ADCC. Daudi cells were incubated with each test article in triplicate at 5 µg/mL for 30 min at 37°C and 5% CO2. Freshly isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells obtained from healthy volunteers were then added at a predetermined optimal effector to target ratio of 50:1. After a 4-h incubation, cell lysis was assessed by CytoTox-One (Promega).

Calcium mobilization. Intracellular calcium was measured in Ramos cells loaded with 20 µmol/L Fluo-3 AM (Invitrogen) using a Becton Dickinson FACScan and the FlowJo program (Tree Star, Inc.). For all samples, a baseline was obtained for 60 s before adding each test article, which includes ionomycin and anti-human IgM as positive controls. To evaluate the effect of cross-linking, cells were incubated with 1 µg/mL of veltuzumab, rituximab, or tositumomab for further 15 min and stimulated with an appropriate second antibody (50 µg/mL final).

Homotypical adhesion. Daudi cells (1.5 x 106/mL) were treated with veltuzumab, Tri-hA20, Tetra-hA20, or Hex-hA20 at 1 nmol/L for 20 h and then examined with an inverted phase-contrast microscope. The results were scored semiquantitatively according to Polyak and Deans (25).

Animal studies. The pharmacokinetic analysis was performed in naive female Swiss-Webster mice (Taconic Farms) and compared with Hex-hA20 and veltuzumab given either i.v. or s.c. using radio-iodinated samples (Supplementary Materials and Methods online). The in vivo efficacy was evaluated in tumor-bearing SCID mice as described in the figure legends. Depletion of natural killer (NK) cells and neutrophils was performed as described (26), with the following modifications. Briefly, mice received i.p. injections of antimouse Gr-1 ascites (100 µL) and TMβ-1 mAb (100 µg) 1 d before inoculating Raji cells and three more weekly i.p. injections of antimouse Gr-1 ascites on days 6, 13, and 20 to maintain neutrophil depletion, which was confirmed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis of blood samples taken from one treated and one untreated mouse on days 3, 13, and 20. Mice deemed to have succumbed to disease progression, when hind-limb paralysis developed or if they otherwise became moribund, were humanely sacrificed. Additionally, if mice lost >20% of initial body weight, they were sacrificed. Survival curves were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier plots (log-rank analysis) and Prism software. All animal studies were performed after approval of the local animal care and use committee.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosure of Potential...
 References
 
Hexavalent antibodies made by DNL. Hex-hA20 was readily obtained by mixing CH1-DDD2-Fab-hA20 and CH3-AD2-IgG-hA20 under redox conditions followed by purification with Protein A. Both CH1-DDD2-Fab-hA20 and CH3-AD2-IgG-hA20 were produced with good yields as fusion proteins in myeloma cells, with subsequent purification from culture supernatants by Protein L and Protein A, respectively.

The purity of Hex-hA20 was shown by reducing SDS-PAGE, which showed only three bands from the constitutive polypeptides (Fig. 2, lanes 1 and 2 ). In addition, nonreducing SDS-PAGE analysis of Hex-hA20 confirmed its covalent structure, because no bands corresponding to the monomeric form of CH3-AD2-IgG-hA20 were observed (Fig. 2, lanes 5 and 6). The molecular mass of Hex-hA20 was determined to be 368,475 Da by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry, which agrees well with the calculated molecular weight of 362 kDa for Hex-hA20 from the deduced amino acid sequences of the constituent polypeptides.


Figure 2
View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 2. SDS-PAGE analysis of protein A–purified samples under reducing (lanes 1–4) and nonreducing (lanes 5–8) conditions. Lanes 1 and 5, Hex-hA20 (2 µg); lanes 2 and 6, Hex-hA20 (0.5 µg); lanes 3 and 7, CH3-AD2-IgG-hA20; lanes 4 and 8, veltuzumab. Left, positions of prestained Mr standards; right, arrows, positions of Hex-hA20, dimeric CH3-AD2-IgG-hA20, monomeric CH3-AD2-IgG-hA20, veltuzumab, heavy chain-AD2, heavy chain, Fd-DDD2, and {kappa} light chain are indicated as Hex, (IgG)2, IgG, H-AD2, H, d-DDD, and K, respectively.

 
The presence of a disulfide-linked dimer of CH3-AD2-IgG-hA20 is evident on nonreducing SDS-PAGE (Fig. 2, lane 7) and supported by its conversion to the monomer upon reduction with glutathione (data not shown). The purity of CH3-AD2-IgG-hA20 is indicated by the observation of only two bands (Fig. 2, lane 3), corresponding to the constituent polypeptides (heavy chain-AD2 and {kappa} chain) on reducing SDS-PAGE. These results are corroborated by the HPLC data shown in Supplementary Fig. S1A-D.

Binding analysis. As shown by competition ELISA in Fig. 3A , Hex-hA20 has a 3-fold higher avidity than veltuzumab, suggesting that at least three or more of the six Fab components are capable of binding simultaneously to the WR2 antiidiotype antibody. The binding of Hex-hA20 to CD20 on live cells was compared with that of veltuzumab by flow cytometry. Figure 3B shows that Hex-hA20 resulted in 40% to 50% greater fluorescence intensity than veltuzumab when probed by PE–anti-Fab. In contrast, the signal observed for Hex-hA20 with PE–anti-Fc was lower than that of veltuzumab. These results are consistent with Hex-hA20 having four more Fabs than veltuzumab, but only one Fc like veltuzumab. Additional evidence for the higher valency and avidity of Hex-hA20 is provided by Scatchard analysis of binding to Raji cells (Fig. 3C), which shows that the apparent association constant of Hex-hA20 [~3.9 x 108 (mol/L)–1] is ~4-fold higher (P < 0.0001) than that of veltuzumab [~1 x 108 (mol/L)–1], whereas an F test determined that the saturation binding curves for rituximab and veltuzumab were similar (P = 0.1859). More importantly, the number of receptors per cell calculated from the maximum number of binding sites (Bmax) obtained for Hex-hA20 was found to be ~1/4 of that obtained with veltuzumab (~100,000 versus ~437,5000), suggesting that all six Fabs of Hex-hA20 are capable of binding to CD20 on the cell surface, because the same number of CD20 molecules would require thrice as many veltuzumab to occupy them. The data obtained from the off-rate measurements (Fig. 3D) also indicate that Hex-hA20 dissociates ~3-fold slower than veltuzumab, which remarkably dissociates ~2-fold to 3-fold slower than rituximab.5


Figure 3
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 3. Analysis of Hex-hA20 binding. A, competition ELISA showing Hex-hA20 has a higher avidity than veltuzumab for binding to WR2. Hex-hA20 ({circ}) or veltuzumab ({blacksquare}) were incubated at varying concentrations in the presence of WR2 for competition of binding with immobilized veltuzumab. The percentage of inhibition was plotted versus mAb concentration, and EC50 values were generated with Prizm software. B, binding to Daudi cells as determined by flow cytometry using PE-conjugated anti-human Fab (PE–anti-Fab) or PE-conjugated anti-human Fc (PE–anti-Fc). All incubations and washes were performed at 4°C. Daudi cells were suspended at 1 x 106 cells/mL in 1% BSA-PBS and incubated with Hex-hA20, veltuzumab, or labetuzumab for 1 h. The cells were washed with 1% BSA-PBS, incubated with a 1:200 dilution of PE–anti-Fab or PE–anti-Fc for 30 min, washed once more, and analyzed on a Guava PCA using the Guava Express software application. C, Scatchard analysis using radio-iodinated Hex-hA20 ({blacksquare}), veltuzumab ({blacktriangleup}), or rituximab ({circ}) and Raji cells. D, dissociation from Daudi or Raji cells. Hex-hA20 (bullet), veltuzumab ({blacksquare}), and rituximab ({blacktriangleup}) were labeled with PE using a Zenon R-phycoerythrin Human IgG Labeling kit (Invitrogen Corp.). Cells were suspended in CM (phenol red–free RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS at 1 x 106 cells/mL), and 5 x 105 cells were incubated with each PE-labeled antibody at 65 nmol/L for 30 min at room temperature. The cells were washed twice with CM to remove unbound antibody, resuspended in 1.5 mL of CM in the presence of 1 µmol/L CH1-DDD2-Fab-hA20 at 37°C, and analyzed for cell-bound PE-labeled antibody at several time points on a Guava PCA using the Guava Express software application. The dissociation half-life was determined by nonlinear regression using Prism software.

 
Antiproliferative activity. Based on the MTS assay (Fig. 4A ), Hex-hA20 strongly inhibited proliferation in three Burkitt lymphoma cell lines, Raji, Ramos, and Daudi, with an EC50 of 0.064, 0.15, and 0.15 nmol/L, respectively. In contrast, veltuzumab in the absence of a cross-linking antibody showed detectable potency in all three cell lines only at >10 nmol/L. As expected, cross-linking of veltuzumab with goat anti-human Fc resulted in significant inhibition of proliferation. For Hex-hA20, cross-linking did not increase its potency further in Daudi. Additional experiments compared the effects of Hex-hA20, Tri-hA20, and Tetra-hA20 on cell proliferation over 5 days by viable cell counting. Representative results are shown in Fig. 4B for Raji and Ramos, which show the ability of Tri-hA20, Tetra-hA20, and Hex-hA20 to prevent 50% or greater cell proliferation without cross-linking at concentrations as low as 0.5 nmol/L. Similar results were obtained for Daudi (data not shown). The cell counting assay also showed that Hex-hA20 (EC50 = 0.17 nmol/L) was considerably more potent than anti-B1 (EC50 = 4.65 nmol/L) when evaluated with Ramos for 3 days.


Figure 4
View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 4. Inhibition of cell proliferation. A, in vitro antiproliferation determined by the 4-d MTS assay for Raji, Ramos, or Daudi. Cells were treated with Hex-hA20 ({circ}), veltuzumab ({blacktriangleup}), or veltuzumab plus goat anti-human Fc ({blacksquare}). Daudi cells were also treated with Hex-hA20 plus goat anti-human Fc ({triangledown}). Briefly, cells were placed in 96-well plates at 5,000 cells per well in complete RPMI 1640. Five-fold serial dilutions of Hex-hA20, veltuzumab, or veltuzumab cross-linked with goat-anti human Fc were added to triplicate wells at final concentrations ranging from 2 x 10–8 to 6.4 x 10–12 mol/L. The plates were incubated for 4 d, after which 20 µL of CellTiter 96 Aqueous One Solution Reagent (Promega Corp.) was added, and the incubation was continued for an additional 4 h before reading the plates at 490 nm. B, in vitro antiproliferation determined by the viable cell counting assay for Ramos (left) or Raji (right). Cells were seeded in T-flasks at 1 x 105 cells/mL and treated with veltuzumab, Tri-hA20, Tetra-hA20, or Hex-hA20 at the indicated concentrations. Viable cell densities (VCD) were determined daily over 5 d by flow cytometry using Guava Viacount. On day 3, cultures were split 1:2 to maintain logarithmic growth. Cells were plotted as viable cells per milliliter measured on days 3, 4, and 5 for veltuzumab (gray lines and symbols) at 15 nmol/L (Figure 4), 2.5 nmol/L (Figure 4), or 0.5 nmol/L (Figure 4), Tri-hA20 (Figure 4) at 0.5 nmol/L, Tetra-hA20 ({circ}) at 0.5 nmol/L, and Hex-hA20 ({triangleup}) at 0.5 nmol/L.

 
Apoptosis and the roles of caspases and calcium. Raji cells were treated with the three multivalent anti-CD20 constructs at 0.5 or 5 nmol/L and analyzed with the Guava Nexin assay after 24 hours (Fig. 5A, left ). Treatment with Tri-hA20, Tetra-hA20, or Hex-hA20 resulted in more cells in early apoptosis (12–16%) compared with the bivalent veltuzumab (6–9%) and the untreated control (3%). Comparable results were obtained with Daudi and Ramos cells (data not shown).


Figure 5
View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 5. A, apoptosis measured by Guava Nexin (left) showing percentage of early apoptotic cells (Annexin V–PE positive/7-AAD negative) induced in Raji after 24-h incubation with veltuzumab, Tri-hA20, Tetra-hA20, or Hex-hA20 at 0.5 nmol/L (black columns) or 5 nmol/L (gray columns); apoptosis measured by Guava MultiCaspase (right) for which Raji cells were cultured in the presence of Hex-hA20 (5 nmol/L), veltuzumab (5 nmol/L), or anti-IgM (5 µg/mL) and analyzed at 3, 7, 16, and 24 h by flow cytometry after staining with SR-VAD-FMK. Cells were plated at 2 x 105 cells/mL in fresh media and incubated at 37°C with each test article at the indicated concentrations for up to 24 h, and duplicate wells were processed for Guava analysis. B, CDC (left) was measured in Daudi cells for Hex-hA20 ({circ}), epratuzumab (Figure 5), veltuzumab ({blacksquare}), or CH3-AD2-IgG-hA20 (Figure 5) in the presence of human complement. The percentage complement control (number of viable cells in the test sample compared with cells treated with complement only) was plotted versus the log of the nanomolar concentration. ADCC (right) was measured for Hex-hA20, veltuzumab, epratuzumab, or labetuzumab at 5 µg/mL using Daudi as the target cells and freshly isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells from two donors as the effector cells. A 100% lysis reference was generated by the addition of detergent to wells containing target cells only. The bar graphs show percentage of lysis obtained for each of the two donors.

 
The extent of apoptosis was also assessed for Raji cells treated with 5 nmol/L Hex-hA20 or veltuzumab over a 24-hour period using the Guava MultiCaspase assay (Fig. 5A, right). The results at 24 hours were 17% and 6% for Hex-hA20 and veltuzumab, respectively, which agree with those determined by the Guava Nexin assay.

The effect of Z-VAD-FMK (a broad-spectrum caspase inhibitor) on apoptosis induced by Hex-hA20 was examined in Ramos, and the results (Supplementary Fig. S2) indicate that Z-VAD-FMK at 100 µmol/L completely prevented the apoptosis induced by antihuman IgM, but not that induced by Hex-hA20, suggesting that both caspase-dependent and caspase-independent pathways occur for Hex-hA20, as reported for rituximab with cross-linking (27). Although CD20 clustering is presumably achievable either indirectly by cross-linking the antigen-bound veltuzumab with a second antibody or directly via multivalent engagement of Hex-hA20, the former, but not the latter, leads to a rapid rise in intracellular calcium levels (Supplementary Fig. S3).

Effector functions. CDC activity was evaluated in vitro using human complement and Daudi cells (Fig. 5B, left). Veltuzumab exhibits potent CDC activity. Surprisingly, Hex-hA20 fails to induce CDC in Daudi cells. Because CH3-AD2-IgG-hA20 induces CDC with similar potency as veltuzumab, modification of the carboxyl termini of veltuzumab by the addition of the small AD2 peptide does not affect CDC, suggesting that the addition of the four Fab-DDD2 groups apparently prevents complement fixation, despite the ability of Hex-hA20 to bind C1q (data not shown). Hex-hA20 and veltuzumab have comparable ADCC (Fig. 5B, right). Thus, the Fc of Hex-hA20 induces ADCC.

Homotypical adhesion. Hex-hA20, Tetra-hA20, and Tri-hA20 induced homotypical adhesion of Daudi cells, resulting in >50% of cells having medium-size to large-size aggregates, whereas under the same conditions, the extent of cell aggregation observed for veltuzumab was similar to that of the untreated control (Supplementary Fig. S4).

Membrane localization of CD20/Hex-hA20. Veltuzumab translocates CD20 into lipid rafts, as shown previously (28) by Western blot analysis of the cell lysates in fractions isolated from sucrose density gradient centrifugation. The distribution of CD20 at the cell surface upon binding to veltuzumab or Hex-hA20 was examined further with immunofluorescence microscopy using cholera toxin subunit B-Alexa Fluor 488 as the reporter for ganglioside GM-1, a common lipid raft marker (29). As shown in Supplementary Fig. S5A-D, incubation of Daudi cells with veltuzumab or Hex-hA20 led to the formation of membrane patches or caps with punctuate spots, which were superbly matched by the images obtained with cholera toxin subunit B, indicating the localization of CD20 in lipid rafts. Although the fluorescent patterns observed were similar, veltuzumab seemed to form larger and fewer patches than Hex-hA20.

Serum stability. Hex-hA20 was found to have the same stability in serum as veltuzumab, maintaining 86% binding activity after 11 days (Supplementary Fig. S6). These results are similar to those of the bispecific Tri-Fab complexes reported previously (22).

Pharmacokinetic analysis. Using radio-iodinated preparations, it was found that Hex-hA20 cleared ~4.5 times faster than veltuzumab when given i.v. (Supplementary Fig. S7A), resulting in a 3.7-fold lower mean residence time for Hex-hA20 compared with veltuzumab (127 hours versus 472 hours). When given s.c. (Supplementary Fig. S7B), Hex-hA20 cleared at a much faster rate (T1/2 ~3 days) than veltuzumab (T1/2 >9 days), with both having the same Tmax of 24 hours. However, the Cmax was only half as high for Hex-hA20 compared with veltuzumab (12.9 nmol/L versus 25.7 nmol/L). Pharmacokinetic variables determined for Hex-hA20 and veltuzumab are provided in Supplementary Table S1.

In vivo efficacy. In the multiple-dose study with the Daudi model, mice were treated with Hex-hA20 at 30 µg (q7dx2) and 6 µg (q7dx2). As shown in Fig. 6A , both treatments resulted in significantly improved median survival time (MST) when compared with the saline control (66.5 and 42 versus 21 days; P < 0.0001). Although no significant difference in survival was observed between mice given Hex-hA20 and veltuzumab at the higher doses, it seemed that mice receiving Hex-hA20 at the lower doses had significantly lower MST than those receiving veltuzumab at an equivalent dose (P = 0.0044).


Figure 6
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Figure 6. Efficacy of Hex-hA20 in human lymphoma xenograft models. A, Daudi cells (1.5 x 107) were injected i.v. into SCID mice on day 0. On days 1 and 8, groups of mice (n = 9–10) were given either Hex-hA20 at two different doses (30 or 6 µg) or equimolar amounts of veltuzumab (12.4 or 2.4 µg). B, SCID mice were depleted of NK cells and neutrophils before the administration of Raji cells with antimouse Gr-1 ascites and TMβ-1 mAb specific for mouse IL-2 receptor, as described in Materials and Methods. On day 0, Raji cells (1 x 106) were injected i.v. into both depleted and nondepleted mice. Hex-hA20 (465 µg) or veltuzumab (200 µg) was given i.v. on days 3, 5, 7, and 11, whereas the control group received saline.

 
We also examined the role of effector cells in inhibiting tumor growth using the Raji model (Fig. 6B). In those animals depleted of NK cells and neutrophils, there was no difference between the saline control and mice treated with veltuzumab or Hex-hA20 (MST = 17 days for all three groups). In contrast, nondepleted mice that received Hex-hA20 or veltuzumab had significantly improved survival than the saline control (P = 0.0034), with the MST of 59, 41, and 19 days for Hex-hA20, veltuzumab, and untreated, respectively. Importantly, a better treatment outcome was observed for Hex-hA20 than for veltuzumab (P = 0.05) at this higher mole-equivalent dose (465 µg Hex-hA20 versus 200 µg veltuzumab).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosure of Potential...
 References
 
The DNL method uses both recombinant engineering and site-specific conjugation chemistry to provide a facile, efficient, and modular platform technology for the production of multivalent antibodies that can be either monospecific or bispecific, resulting in novel constructs which are different from other designs reported in the literature (1316, 3034). Among the various approaches for generating multivalent antibodies, chemical cross-linking is generally considered impractical for developing commercial products, whereas recombinant engineering often leaves uncertainty that every scFv or Fab in the resulting structures is capable of binding to its antigen simultaneously with full affinity (16, 30). The DNL method described herein seems to adequately resolve these concerns. First, as shown by SE-HPLC, SDS-PAGE, and mass spectrometry, each veltuzumab-based, multivalent construct generated by DNL has a defined composition of the expected molecular size and can be readily purified to near homogeneity. Second, a unique feature shared by the various types of multivalent antibodies made by DNL is the ability of each Fab constituent in the respective structure to engage its cognate antigen either in the form of immobilized antiidiotype antibody or on the target cell surface, as shown collectively for Hex-hA20 by competition ELISA, flow cytometry, and Scatchard analysis. Moreover, the fact that Tri-hA20, but not veltuzumab, can potently inhibit the proliferation of CD20-positive cells in vitro is consistent with the notion that all three Fabs in Tri-hA20 are capable of simultaneously binding to CD20, resulting in clustering of CD20 and the onset of signal transduction, which leads us to conclude that a minimum valency of 3 is required for an anti-CD20 antibody to effectively induce growth inhibition without cross-linking. A similar observation was reported by Miller and colleagues (30) that, at 2 to 3 nmol/L, trivalent and tetravalent anti-CD20 constructs made by linearly stitching two or more Fab groups of rituximab were able to induce maximal apoptosis (up to 25%) of the B-lymphoma cell line, WIL2-S, without requiring further cross-linking. More recently, tetravalent anti-CD20 antibodies made by genetically fusing an identical pair of scFvs in tandem to the hinge CH2-CH3 were also shown by Li and colleagues (16) to have significant antiproliferative and apoptotic activities in Daudi and Raji lymphoma cells in the absence of a second antibody, despite the lack of direct evidence that all of the four scFvs are engaged in antigen-binding.

Based on their efficacy in certain in vitro assays, anti-CD20 mAbs have been classified by Cragg and colleagues (35) as either type I, represented by rituximab, or type II, represented by tositumomab (36). Type I anti-CD20 mAbs are characterized by potent CDC, rapid calcium mobilization upon the addition of a second antibody (37, 38), weak induction of homotypical adhesion (39), enhanced association of CD20 with lipid rafts (40), and a general requirement of cross-linking for efficient antiproliferation or apoptosis (39). In contrast, type II anti-CD20 mAbs lack CDC, fail to bring CD20 into lipid rafts (3, 4), induce a high level of homotypical adhesion (39), and do not stimulate calcium mobilization upon further cross-linking (37). A further differentiation is that apoptotic cell death mediated by type I mAbs involves both caspase-dependent and caspase-independent pathways, but only caspase-independent pathways seem to be associated with type II mAbs (4). However, both type I and type II anti-CD20 mAbs are effective in ADCC and apparently bind to the same region of the extracelluar loop of CD20 on the plasma membrane (4143). Interestingly, at saturation, the number by which a type II mAb binds to each CD20-positive B cell only approaches half of that observed with a type I mAb (3, 4), suggesting that a type II mAb may act virtually as a tetravalent antibody by engaging two adjacent extracellular loops of CD20 with each antigen-binding site.

We note that Hex-hA20 exhibits biological properties attributable to both type II (for example, negative for CDC and calcium mobilization; positive for antiproliferation, apoptosis, and homotypical adhesion) and type I (for example, positive for trafficking to lipid rafts). Thus, one effective approach to converting a type I anti-CD20 mAb to a type II can be achieved by making the type I mAb multivalent. Preliminary investigation of the signaling pathway indicates that Hex-hA20 induces caspase-dependent, as well as caspase-independent, apoptosis. Additional studies are in progress to identify the subcellular events associated with the binding of CD20 by Hex-hA20 or Tri-hA20, which may reveal unequivocally the molecular factors that account for the antiproliferative potency of a multivalent anti-CD20 antibody with defined composition.

When tested against human lymphoma xenografts in mice, the therapeutic activity of Hex-hA20 was comparable, but not better, than the parental veltuzumab, except when a higher mole-equivalent dose (such as 465 µg) was given. Because mouse complement was reported to be inactive in mediating CDC of the DHL-4 cell line in vitro by rituximab (26), the shorter half-life of Hex-hA20 rather than the lack of CDC may explain why the in vivo antitumor efficacy of Hex-hA20 was not superior to that of the bivalent veltuzumab, suggesting that more frequent or higher doses of Hex-hA20 may be indicated. It is also noted that cross-linking of veltuzumab may occur in vivo via binding to effector cells (44), thus mimicking the advantage of Hex-hA20 over veltuzumab in vitro. The observation that neither veltuzumab nor Hex-hA20 is effective in mouse models depleted with NK cells and neutrophils emphasizes the importance of ADCC for in vivo killing of tumor cells. Whether a multivalent anti-CD20 construct can be made by DNL to retain CDC and show more potent antitumor effects in vivo is worthy to determine. On the other hand, because CDC has been suggested to be a major factor in infusion-related toxicity for rituximab, it is tempting to speculate that Hex-hA20 may be a viable alternative where reduced side effects are desired.


    Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosure of Potential...
 References
 
E.A. Rossi, D.M. Goldenberg, T.M. Cardillo, Y. Wang, and C-H. Chang: Employment and ownership interest, Immunomedics, Inc. and IBC Pharmaceuticals, Inc. R. Stein disclosed no potential conflicts of interest.


    Acknowledgments
 
Grant support: National Cancer Institute grant P01-CA103985 from NIH (D.M. Goldenberg).

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

We thank Meiyu Loo, Diana Delaney, Diane Nordstrom, and John Kopinski for excellent technical assistance, Dr. Xiaochuan Chen for advice on measuring cytoplasmic calcium by flow cytometry, and Dr. Francisco Hernandez-Ilizaliturri for the protocol of depleting NK cells and neutrophils in SCID mice.


    Footnotes
 
Note: Supplementary data for this article are available at Cancer Research Online (http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/).

4 D. Nordstrom, E.A. Rossi, D.M. Goldenberg, C-H. Chang, unpublished data. Back

D.M. Goldenberg, E.A. Rossi, R. Stein, T.M. Cardillo, M.S. Czuczman, F.J. Hernandez-Ilizaliturri, H.J. Hansen, C-H. Chang. Properties and structure-function relationships of veltuzumab (hA20), a humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb), submitted for publication. Back

Received 5/29/08. Revised 8/13/08. Accepted 8/14/08.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Disclosure of Potential...
 References
 

  1. Martin P, Furman RR, Ruan J, et al. Novel and engineered anti-B-cell monoclonal antibodies for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Semin Hematol 2008;45:126–32.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Goldblatt F, Isenberg DA. Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody in rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2008;181:163–81.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Teeling JL, French RR, Cragg MS, et al. Characterization of new human CD20 monoclonal antibodies with potent cytolytic activity against non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 2004;104:1793–800.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Umana P, Moessner E, Bruenker P, et al. Novel third generation humanized type II CD20 antibody with superior direct cell death induction and glycoengineered Fc region for enhanced ADCC induction. Blood 2006;108:Abstract #229.
  5. Glennie MJ. French RR, Cragg MS, Taylor RP. Mechanisms of killing by anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies. Mol Immunol 2007;44:3823–37.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Shuford W, Raff HV, Finley JW, Esselstyn J, Harris LJ. Effect of light chain V region duplication on IgG oligomerization and in vivo efficacy. Science 1991;252:724–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Shopes B. A genetically engineered human IgG mutant with enhanced cytolytic activity. J Immunol 1992;148:2918–22.[Abstract]
  8. Caron PC, Laird W, Co MS, Avdalovic NM, Queen C, Scheinberg DA. Engineered humanized dimeric forms of IgG are more effective antibodies. J Exp Med 1992;176:1191–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Wolff EA, Schreiber GJ, Cosand WL, Raff HV. Monoclonal antibody homodimers: enhanced antitumor activity in nude mice. Cancer Res 1993;53:2560–5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Ng PP, Cruz JSD, Sorour DN, et al. An anti-transferrin receptor-avidin fusion protein exhibits both strong proapoptotic activity and the ability to deliver various molecules into cancer cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99:10706–11.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Ghetie M-A, Podar EM, Ilgen A, Gordon BE, Uhr JW, Vitetta ES. Homodimerization of tumor-reactive monoclonal antibodies markedly increases their ability to induce growth arrest or apoptosis of tumor cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997;94:7509–14.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Ghetie M-A, Bright H, Vitetta ES. Homodimers but not monomers of rituxan (chimeric anti-CD20) induce apoptosis in human B-lymphoma cells and synergize with a chemotherapeutic agent and an immunotoxin. Blood 2001;97:1392–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Huang TH, Morrison SL. A trimeric anti-HER2/neu scFv and tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} fusion protein induces HER2/neu signaling and facilitates repair of injured epithelia. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2006;316:983–91.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Meng R, Smallshaw JE, Pop LM, et al. The evaluation of recombinant, chimeric, tetravalent antihuman CD22 antibodies. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:1274–81.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Liu XY, Pop LM, Roopenian DC, Ghetie V, Vitetta ES, Smallshaw JE. Generation and characterization of a novel tetravalent anti-CD22 antibody with improved antitumor activity and pharmacokinetics. Int Immunopharmacol 2006;6:791–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Li B, Shi S, Qian W, et al. Development of novel tetravalent anti-CD20 antibodies with potent antitumor activity. Cancer Res 2008;68:2400–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Zhang N, Khawli LA, Hu P, Epstein AL. Generation of rituximab polymer may cause hyper-cross-linking-induced apoptosis in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res 2005;11:5971–80.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Stein R, Qu Z, Chen S, et al. Characterization of a new humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. IMMU-106, and its use in combination with the humanized anti-CD22 antibody, epratuzumab, for the therapy of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:2868–78.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Morschhauser F, Leonard JP, Fayad LE, et al. Low doses of humanized anti-CD20 antibody, IMMU-106 (hA20), in refractory or recurrent NHL: phase I/II results [Abstr. #8032]. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:449s.[CrossRef]
  20. Baillie GS, Scott JD, Houslay MD. Compartmentalisation of phosphodiesterases and protein kinase A: opposites attract. FEBS Letters 2005;579:3264–70.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Wong W, Scott JD. AKAP signaling complexes: focal points in space and time. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2004;5:959–70.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Rossi, EA, Goldenberg DM, Cardillo TM, McBride WJ, Sharkey RM, Chang CH. Stably tethered multifunctional structures of defined composition made by the dock and lock method for use in cancer targeting. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006;103:6841–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Chang CH, Rossi EA, Goldenberg DM. The dock and lock method: a novel platform technology for building multivalent, multifunctional structures of defined composition with retained bioactivity. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:5586–91s.[CrossRef]
  24. Qu Z, Griffiths GL, Wegener WA, et al. Development of humanized antibodies as cancer therapeutics. Methods 2005;36:84–95.[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Polyak MJ, Deans JP. Alanine-170 and proline-172 are critical determinants for extracellular CD20 epitopes; heterogeneity in the fine specificity of CD20 monoclonal antibodies is defined by additional requirements imposed by both amino acid sequence and quaternary structure. Blood 2002;99:3256–62.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Hernandez-Ilizaliturri FJ, Jupudy V, Ostberg J, et al. Neutrophils contribute to the biological antitumor activity of rituximab in a non-Hodgkin's lymphoma severe combined immunodeficiency mouse model. Clin Cancer Res 2003;9:5866–73.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. van der Kolk LE, Evers LM, Omene C, et al. CD20-induced B cell death can bypass mitochondria and caspase activation. Leukemia 2002;16:1735–44.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Qu Z, Goldenberg DM, Cardillo TM, Shi V, Hansen HJ, Chang C-H. Bispecific anti-CD20/22 antibodies inhibit B-cell lymphoma proliferation by a unique mechanism of action. Blood 2008;111:2211–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Mone AP, Cheney C, Banks AL, et al. Alemtuzumab induces caspase-independent cell death in human chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells through a lipid raft-dependent mechanism. Leukemia 2006;20:272–9.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Miller K, Meng G, Liu J, et al. Design, construction, and in vitro analysis of multivalent antibodies. J Immunol 2003;170:4854–61.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Jendreyko N, Popkov M, Beerli RR, et al. Intrabodies, bispecific, tetravalent antibodies for the simultaneous functional knockout of two cell surface receptors. J Biol Chem 2003;278:47812–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Shen J, Vil MD, Jimenez X, Iacolina M, Zhang H, Zhu Z. Single variable domain-IgG fusion. A novel recombinant approach to Fc domain-containing bispecific antibodies. J Biol Chem 2006;281:10706–14.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Shen J, Vil MD, Jimenez X, et al. Single variable domain antibody as a versatile building block for the construction of IgG-like bispecific antibodies. J Immunol Methods 2007;318:65–74.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Wu C, Yinh H, Grinnell C, et al. Simultaneous targeting of multiple disease mediators by a dual-variable-domain immunoglobulin. Nat Biotech 2007;25:1290–7.[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Cragg MS, Morgan SM, Chan HT et al. Complement-mediated lysis by anti-CD20 mAb correlates with segregation into lipid rafts. Blood 2003;101:1045–52.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Cardarelli PM, Quinn M, Buckman D, et al. Binding of CD20 by anti-B1 antibody or F(ab')2 is sufficient for induction of apoptosis in B-cell lines. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2002;51:15–24.[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Unruh TL, Li H, Mutch CM, et al. Cholesterol depletion inhibits src family kinase-dependent calcium mobilization and apoptosis induced by rituximab crosslinking. Immunology 2005;116:223–32.[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Hofmeister JK, Cooney D, Coggeshall KM. Clustered CD20 induces apoptosis: src-family kinase, the proximal regulator of tyrosine phosphorylation, calcium influx, and caspase-dependent apoptosis. Blood Cells Mol Dis 2000;26:133–43.[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Deans JP, Polyak MJ. CD20-mediated apoptosis: signaling through lipid rafts. Immunology 2002;107:176–82.[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Li H, Ayer LM, Polyak MJ, et al. The CD20 calcium channel is localized to microvilli and constitutively associated with membrane rafts: antibody binding increases the affinity of the association through an epitope-dependent cross-linking-independent mechanism. J Biol Chem 2004;279:19893–901.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Teeling JL, Mackus WJ, Wiegman LJ, et al. The biological activity of human CD20 monoclonal antibodies is linked to unique epitopes on CD20. J Immunol 2006;177:362–71.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Ernst JA, Li H, Kim HS, Nakamura GR, Yansura DG, Vandlen RL. Isolation and characterization of the B-cell marker CD20. Biochemistry 2005;44:15150–8.[CrossRef][Medline]
  43. Du J, Wang H, Zhong C, et al. Structural basis for recognition of CD20 by therapeutic antibody Rituximab. J Biol Chem 2007;282:15073–80.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Shan D, Ledbetter JA, Press OW. Apoptosis of malignant human B cells by ligation of CD20 with monoclonal antibodies. Blood 1998;91:1644–52.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
E. A. Rossi, D. M. Goldenberg, T. M. Cardillo, R. Stein, and C.-H. Chang
CD20-targeted tetrameric interferon-{alpha}, a novel and potent immunocytokine for the therapy of B-cell lymphomas
Blood, October 29, 2009; 114(18): 3864 - 3871.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
E. A. Rossi, D. M. Goldenberg, T. M. Cardillo, R. Stein, and C.-H. Chang
Hexavalent bispecific antibodies represent a new class of anticancer therapeutics: 1. Properties of anti-CD20/CD22 antibodies in lymphoma
Blood, June 11, 2009; 113(24): 6161 - 6171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rossi, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Chang, C.-H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rossi, E. A.
Right arrow Articles by Chang, C.-H.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online