| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Cell, Tumor, and Stem Cell Biology |
Departments of Developmental Biology, Genetics, and Bioengineering, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
Requests for reprints: Matthew P. Scott, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Clark Center W252, 318 Campus Drive, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305. Phone: 650-725-7680; Fax: 650-725-2952; E-mail: mscott{at}stanford.edu.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
15% of mice, these preneoplastic cells will become fast-growing, lethal tumors. It was previously shown that the loss of function of insulin-like growth factor 2 (igf2) suppresses MB formation in ptc1+/– mice. We found that igf2 is not expressed in preneoplastic lesions but is induced as these lesions progress to more advanced MB tumors. Igf2 is not required for formation of preneoplastic lesions but is necessary for progression to advanced tumors. Exogenous Igf2 protein promoted proliferation of MB precursor cells (GNP) and a MB cell line, PZp53MED. Blocking igf2 signaling inhibited growth of PZp53MED cells, implicating igf2 as a potential clinical target. [Cancer Res 2008;68(21):8788–95] | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the developing cerebellum, Shh signal produced by Purkinje neurons stimulates proliferation of GNPs in the external germinal layer (EGL) on the surface of the cerebellum (8–10). Shh target genes, such as N-myc and cyclin-D1, become active and promote cell cycle entry (11–13). In mice, expansion of GNPs ceases within 3 weeks after birth, as GNPs migrate to the internal granule cell layer and differentiate to form mature granule neurons (Fig. 1A ). By the end of this period, the EGL has disappeared.
|
Insulin-like growth factor 2 (igf2) is expressed at high levels compared with normal tissue in both MB and RMS in ptc1+/– mice (15) and in humans (18–20, 22). Hahn and colleagues (21) showed that igf2 is critical for the formation of both MB and RMS in ptc1+/– mice. When ptc1+/– mice are crossed into an igf2-deficient background, they no longer form MB or RMS such as their igf2-wild-type littermates. Igf2 has also been shown to synergize with the Shh pathway to promote MB, as retroviral transfer of Shh and Igf2 expression constructs into postnatal cerebella causes a higher incidence of MB formation than delivery of a Shh expression construct alone (23). Igf2 protein can stimulate proliferation of cultured MB cell lines and their precursor cells, GNPs, suggesting a mechanistic basis for the role of igf2 in MB tumorigenesis (24).
Important questions remain about the involvement of igf2 in MB. The mechanism of increased igf2 expression in MB and RMS from ptc1+/– mice is not clear. Two independent analyses of igf2 expression from maternal and paternal alleles showed that increased igf2 levels do not result from loss of imprinting in MB or RMS or from gene amplification (21, 24). Rather, increased igf2 RNA levels seemed to be induced at a purely transcriptional level. Hahn and colleagues (21) proposed that igf2 might be a Shh target gene, overexpressed in ptc1+/– tumors due to constitutive Shh pathway target gene transcription. In support of this hypothesis, the authors showed that compared with ptc1+/+ embryonic day 8.5 embryos, igf2 transcript levels were higher in ptc1+/– embryos and highest in ptc1–/– embryos. C3H/10T1/2 cells transfected with the Shh pathway–activating transcription factor Gli1 have increased igf2 RNA levels after 72 hours (25). However, cultured GNPs treated with Shh do not have increased igf2 RNA levels at the 6-hours time point tested (24). Therefore, it remains unclear whether constitutive Shh pathway transcriptional activity causes the increased levels of igf2 transcript found in MB.
It is also not clear what role igf2 plays in MB tumorigenesis. Igf2 could contribute to tumor initiation, either as a critical Shh target gene or an independently regulated gene. Alternatively, igf2 could cooperate with the Shh pathway to cause tumor progression at a specific stage of tumorigenesis.
Here, we evaluate igf2 expression at multiple stages of MB tumorigenesis. We also test the requirement for igf2 during early and late stages of tumorigenesis. We show that igf2 is not required for tumor initiation but is required for progression to advanced MB lesions. Modulation of igf2 signaling can regulate proliferation of MB cells in vitro, suggesting that igf2 is important not just for tumor progression but also for tumor maintenance.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Math1-gfp ptc1+/– igf2– mice and igf2+ littermates were sacrificed at 3 wk to evaluate for early MB formation. Cerebella were visualized under a fluorescent dissecting microscope for development of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-positive lesions. Adult ptc1+/– igf2– and ptc1+/– igf2+ littermates were assessed for MB formation at 20 to 24 wk by visual inspection of cerebella and X-gal staining, as previously described (14).
Microarray analysis. Early and intermediate MB cells were isolated from cerebella of math1-gfp ptc1+/– mice at 3 to 6 wk or 10 to 20 wk, respectively. Tumors were identified by inspection of cerebella for GFP fluorescence. Tumors were dissected and GFP-expressing cells were isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). Advanced MBs were isolated from symptomatic ptc1+/– mice and tumor cells were purified as previously described (10). RNA was isolated using Trizol reagent (Life Technologies). RNA was amplified using Riboamp kit (Arcturus). Probe was reverse transcribed in the presence of aminoallyl-dUTP (Sigma) and subsequently labeled with Cy3 or Cy5 dye (Amersham). Probe made from tumor cell RNA was hybridized to cDNA microarrays produced by the Stanford Microarray Facility. Cy3-labeled tumor cell probes were hybridized against Cy5-labeled probe made from RNA isolated from high-level GFP-expressing GNPs isolated by FACS from the outer EGL of math1-gfp mice. Igf2 transcript level values are displayed relative to outer EGL GNPs. Average values of five independent probes were determined, per experiment.
Quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR. Igf2 and gli1 transcript levels were measured by real-time PCR using RNA isolated with Trizol reagent (Life Technologies). Gene expression assays for mouse igf2, gli1, and pgk1 and gapdh were purchased from Applied Biosystems. Igf2 and gli1 transcript levels were normalized to gapdh transcript levels in tumor cell, fibroblast, and PZp53MED cell experiments and to pgk1 transcript levels in GNP cell experiments.
P7 GNPs were isolated and cultured with or without 3 µg/mL Shh for 48 h as previously described (10). PZp53MED cells, ptc1+/– fibroblasts, or ptc1+/+ fibroblasts were cultured to confluence in DMEM + 0.5% fetal bovine serum (FBS) in the presence or absence of 10 µmol/L cyclopamine. RNA from ptc1+/+ fibroblasts transfected with cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter–driven GFP, Gli1, and Gli2 expression constructs was kindly provided by Dr. Anna Penn (Stanford University, Stanford, CA).
In situ hybridization studies. 35S-UTP–labeled probes were made by in vitro transcription, with T3 or T7 RNA polymerase, of linearized plasmids purchased from American Type Culture Collection. Probes were diluted to 5 x 106 cpm/mL final concentration in buffer containing Escherichia coli tRNA and DTT. Frozen tissue was embedded in ornithine carbamyl transferase and cut to 15-µm sections on glass slides. Sections were dried and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and dehydrated through ethanol. Before hybridization, sections were treated with Proteinase K, acetylated with acetic anhydride, and dehydrated through ethanol. Hybridization was performed at 60°C to 65°C overnight. Sections were RNase treated and washed with increasing stringencies of SSC with DTT. Slides were dehydrated, dipped in photographic emulsion, incubated for 4 to 14 d, developed, and counterstained with Cresyl violet.
Cell survival assays. P7 GNPs were cultured in Neurobasal medium (Life Technologies) with or without B27 supplement for 48 h. Igf2 protein (R&D systems) was added to a final concentration of 250 ng/mL. Cell titer was determined with CellTiter96 assay (Promega).
Cell proliferation assays. Proliferation of PZp53MED cells in the presence of anti-Igf1R (Anti-IR3; Calbiochem) blocking antibody was assayed by seeding cells at 1 to 2 x 103 cells per well of a 96-well plate in DMEM+0.5% FBS. Antibody or Igf2 protein was diluted in DMEM+0.5% FBS and added to cells 3 h after seeding. Cells were cultured for 48 h, and cell titer was determined by CellTiter96 assay.
For sIgf2R experiments, PZp53MED cells were seeded at 6 x 103 cells per well on coverslips in 24-well plates. The next day, cells were cotransfected in triplicate with 0.5 µg pEYFP-N3 and 1 µg of either pEFBOS-sIgf2R (kindly provided by Dr. Bass Hassan, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom) or, as a control, 1 µg of pECFP-N2. Twenty-four hours posttransfection, cells were switched to DMEM+0.5% FBS and cultured for an additional 36 h. BrdUrd was added for the final 6 h. Cells were fixed, permeabilized, blocked, and DNase treated as above. Cells were stained with rat anti-BrdUrd antibody (Abcam) at 1:50 dilution. The next day, anti-BrdUrd staining was detected with TRITC-conjugated anti-rat secondary antibody. Percentage of YFP-positive cells that were also BrdUrd positive was calculated for each sample.
Immunoblotting and immunoprecipitation. Cells were grown to confluence in 10-cm plates and then serum starved for 48 h in DMEM+0.5% FBS. Then, cells were treated with 1 µg/mL or 10 µg/mL anti-Igf1R antibody (Calbiochem) and/or 250 ng/mL Igf2 protein (R&D systems), as described above, for 30 min. Protein extracts were prepared in radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer containing 50 mmol/L Tris, 1% NP40, 0.25% sodium deoxycholate, 150 mmol/L NaCl, 1 mmol/L EDTA, 1 mmol/L DTT, 1 mmol/L phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, protease inhibitors (Roche), and phosphatase inhibitors (Calbiochem). Protein samples (30 µg per sample) were resolved by SDS-PAGE, transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Bio-Rad), and then immunoblotted with the following antibodies: anti-Igf1Rβ (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti–phospho-Akt (ser473; Cell Signaling), anti-Akt (Cell Signaling), and anti–β-Tubulin (Covance). For determination of Igf1R phosphorylation, 200 µg protein extracts were incubated overnight at 4°C with anti-phosphotyrosine antibody (Upstate) bound to protein G beads (Invitrogen). The immunoprecipitates were washed extensively, eluted in SDS sample buffer, and subjected to Western blotting analysis using an anti-Igf1Rβ antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
15% of 10-week-old mice, the majority of which seem to progress to advanced MBs; and (c) advanced, symptomatic MB that occur in
15% of mice, with peak incidence at ages
20 weeks. For comparison, we used RNA from a purified population of GNPs, the precursor cells of MB, isolated from the EGL of normal postnatal day 7 (P7) cerebella.
We found that igf2 transcript levels are not significantly increased in early MB lesions relative to normal GNPs. Igf2 transcript levels are significantly increased only in intermediate MBs and are even higher in advanced MBs (Fig. 1B). Only 20% of individually tested early MBs have significantly increased levels relative to normal GNPs, compared with 36% of intermediate and 100% of advanced MBs (Fig. 1C). To confirm these microarray results, igf2 transcript levels from individual early, intermediate, and advanced MBs were measured by quantitative real-time PCR. Advanced MB samples showed a statistically significant increase (
20- to 50-fold) in igf2 transcript levels (Fig. 1D). Igf2 transcript levels were not statistically increased in any of the early or intermediate MBs tested. Increased igf2 transcription seems to be a late event in MB tumorigenesis and is correlated with the critical transition from early and intermediate to advanced MBs.
In situ hybridization of early and advanced MB with a probe specific for igf2 showed absent or low levels of igf2 transcript in early MB but very high levels of transcript in advanced MBs (Fig. 2A and B ). These data are consistent with our microarray data, confirming that increased igf2 transcription is a late event in MB tumorigenesis. High levels of igf2 transcript were also detected in the meninges of normal cerebella and cerebella containing tumors (Fig. 2A and B, arrows; Fig. 2C).
|
To further investigate the relationship between Shh pathway activity and igf2 transcription, we examined the effect on igf2 transcript levels of activating or inhibiting the Shh pathway in cultured GNPs and MB cells. Shh-treatment of primary GNP cultures does not increase igf2 transcript levels after 6 hours (24). However, treatment of GNPs with Shh for 24 hours increased igf2 transcription relative to untreated controls (Fig. 3A ). Similarly, treatment of PZp53MED cells, a MB cell line derived from a ptc1+/– p53–/– mouse MB, with the Shh pathway inhibitor, cyclopamine reduced igf2 transcript levels relative to untreated controls (Fig. 3B). These results show that activation or inhibition of Shh target gene transcription can influence igf2 mRNA levels in cultured MB cells and their precursors.
|
In summary, regulation of igf2 by the Shh pathway is complex. Although igf2 is a Shh-responsive gene in some cell types, it seems that igf2 is refractory to induction by Shh in the developing cerebellum and in early MBs that express other Shh target genes.
Igf2 is required for MB tumor progression but not tumor initiation. Hahn and colleagues (21) showed that igf2 is required for formation of advanced MBs in ptc1+/– mice, but which stage of tumorigenesis requires igf2 is unknown. Because igf2 transcription is induced during the transition between early and advanced MBs, we tested whether igf2 is required for early MB formation. The low level of igf2 expression in early MBs suggests that early MB formation would not require igf2 to be active within the pretumor cells. However, it is still possible that igf2 might play a role in early MB tumor initiation because paracrine Igf2 signal produced in the neighboring meninges could stimulate GNPs or MB cells during early tumorigenesis. In this way, early lesions might be dependent on igf2, despite their lack of igf2 expression. Late in tumorigenesis, when lesions become too large to subsist on meningeal Igf2 alone, Igf2 produced by the tumor cells themselves may supplement the meningeal source through autocrine signaling.
To distinguish between these possibilities, we crossed Math1-gfp ptc1+/– females with igf2+/– males and analyzed Math1-gfp ptc1+/– offspring that were igf2+/– or igf2+/+. Because igf2 is an imprinted gene, only the paternal allele is expressed, and igf2+/– offspring are effectively igf2 null. We analyzed igf2+/– and igf2+/+ mice for early MB lesions and for MB formation. Consistent with previously reported results (21), no advanced MBs were observed in igf2 null offspring, whereas advanced MBs formed as expected in their igf2 wild-type littermates (Table 1 ). In contrast, formation of early MB lesions occurred even in the absence of igf2. All igf2 wild-type and null offspring developed clusters of preneoplastic cells by ages 3 weeks. These results suggest that igf2 plays a critical role exclusively in the progression to advanced MBs.
|
|
|
When PZp53MED cells or HELA cell controls were cultured in the presence of anti-Igf1R antibody, PZp53MED cells showed a
40% decrease in cell number relative to untreated PZp53MED cells after 48 hours (Fig. 5C). There was no significant difference in cell number between treated and untreated HELA cells.
Blocking Igf1R can potentially also block the effects of Igf1 and Insulin. To more specifically block the effects of MB cell–produced Igf2, we used a soluble Igf2-Receptor (sIgf2R) construct that has been used previously to block the effects of Igf2 on cells or in vivo tissues (30, 31). When sIgf2R is expressed, it is secreted from the cell where it binds and sequesters the Igf2 ligand, blocking its effect. Because sIgf2R specifically binds Igf2, it does not interfere with the actions of insulin, Igf1, or Igf1R. When PZp53MED cells were transfected with sIgf2R, they showed a
60% reduction in proliferation, measured by BrdUrd incorporation, relative to CFP-transfected cells (Fig. 5D). These results indicate that Igf2 is specifically required for MB cell proliferation. In summary, we observe that activation or inhibition of Igf2 signaling can promote or prevent MB cell growth, respectively.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One explanation for why igf2 transcription might be induced by Shh in cultured GNPs but not in GNPs or early tumor cells in vivo is that the level of Shh pathway activation achieved in culture may be higher than in vivo. The concentration of Shh protein used in our cultured assays causes maximal activation of Shh target gene transcription (10). If igf2 transcription requires very high levels of Shh pathway activity, then perhaps this threshold activity is not achieved until late in tumorigenesis. Alternatively, the presence of some activating factor in the culture medium, or the absence of some inhibitory factor that is present in the intact developing cerebellum may account for the differences in the response of GNPs to Shh in vitro versus in vivo. For example, restrictive chromatin structure or the presence of repressive transcription factors in cells in vivo may not be reproduced when these cells are cultured in vitro.
Another explanation for the pattern of igf2 regulation could be that Shh target gene transcription alone cannot account for increased igf2 transcription in MB. Shh target gene transcription likely plays a role in increased igf2 transcription because igf2 transcript levels are decreased in cultured MB cells treated with the Shh pathway inhibitor cyclopamine, albeit only 2-fold. Another regulator may cooperate with the Shh pathway to induce igf2 transcription.
What might be responsible for the dramatic increase in igf2 transcription that occurs late in MB tumorigenesis? Increased igf2 expression due to altered transcriptional regulation in human tumors is a common finding, and perhaps such a mechanism cooperates with the Shh pathway to cause increased igf2 transcript levels in MB. Igf2 expression is induced by overexpression of the early growth response gene 1 protein in prostate cancer (32). Igf2 expression may be induced due to mutation of its flanking regulatory sequences. Changes in the 3' untranslated region of igf2 are associated with 100- to 1,000-fold increases in igf2 transcript levels in colorectal cancer (33). Altered methylation of the igf2 promoter causes increased igf2 transcription in hepatoblastoma (34).
PTEN activity can modulate igf2 expression in hepatoma (35). Increased PTEN activity leads to decreased igf2 transcription, and decreased PTEN activity causes increased igf2 transcription. Because igf2 signaling antagonizes PTEN activity by activating PI3-K (36), increases in Igf2 production may induce progressively increased autotranscription in feed-forward fashion. This hypothesis could explain why Hartmann and colleagues (24) did not see induction of igf2 transcription in GNPs treated with Shh alone for 6 hours but did see low-level induction of igf2 transcription in GNPs treated with Shh and Igf2. Shh target gene transcription and Igf2 production, first from the meninges and later from tumor cells themselves, may cooperate to induce igf2 transcription during MB tumorigenesis. A better understanding of the mechanism of increased igf2 expression in MB could yield opportunities to reverse this induction and inhibit the oncogenic effects of Igf2.
Temporal requirement for igf2 in late tumorigenesis. Our results suggest that induction of igf2 transcription is a late event in MB tumorigenesis that occurs as the preneoplastic cells of early MBs acquire a malignant phenotype. The requirement for Igf2 activity arises in late tumorigenesis, as early MB lesion formation occurs in the absence of igf2. These data do not preclude that igf2 may contribute to early tumorigenesis, as high levels of igf2 transcription are observed in the overlying meninges. However, the indispensable role for igf2 in MB formation occurs only in the late malignant conversion of MB and not during tumor initiation. This hypothesis is consistent with the observation that activation of Igf2 signaling alone in the developing cerebellum by retroviral transfer of igf2 is not sufficient to initiate MB formation (23).
This temporal pattern suggests a cooperation of autocrine Igf2 and other Shh target genes in MB tumorigenesis. Recent data have supported a cooperative hypothesis for these pathways. If Shh and Igf2 are introduced into neural progenitors by retroviral delivery, the frequency of MB formation is 3-fold greater than with delivery of Shh alone (23). The Shh and Igf2 pathways converge to trigger the production of high levels of N-myc protein. The Shh pathway stimulates transcription of N-myc, whereas the Igf pathway leads to stabilization of N-myc protein through Akt-mediated effects on GSK-3β (12, 13, 37). Consistent with this hypothesis, retroviral delivery of stabilized N-myc along with Shh also causes a 3-fold increase in MB frequency compared with Shh alone (38).
Igf2 might also cooperate with the Shh pathway in MB tumorigenesis by activating cell survival pathways. We show that Igf2 can promote GNP survival under conditions that normally lead to apoptosis. Similarly, the Igf family members, insulin and Igf1, can promote survival in cultured GNPs, likely through activation of the proto-oncogene Akt (39).
Igf2 may cooperate with Shh to promote transcription of Shh target genes. Transcription of the Shh target genes, gli1 and cyclinD1, is significantly increased in GNPs cotreated with Shh and Igf2 compared with Shh alone (24). Igf2 could increase levels of Shh target transcripts, including, as proposed earlier, igf2 itself, to promote tumor formation.
A model for MB tumorigenesis. Based on our findings, we propose the following model of MB tumorigenesis. Normal GNPs in ptc1+/– mice accumulate one or more mutations that result in constitutive Shh target gene expression. The mutation could inactivate the remaining copy of ptc1, perhaps by methylation (16), or affect some other component. Cells with active Shh targets would proliferate and would resist cues to arrest and differentiate, leading to formation of early MBs. Most of these lesions resolve or remain as benign lesions that are noted in most asymptomatic adult ptc1+/– mice. In an ill-fated subset of these mice, the pre-MB cells would undergo additional changes, the most critical being those that cause increased transcription of igf2. Increased autocrine Igf2 production would allow persistence of these lesions and their conversion to a malignant phenotype. Such a further transformation would be consistent with the effects of Igf2 on cell survival and growth. These lesions then progress to form the advanced MB seen in
15% of ptc1+/– mice.
Given the apparent requirement of igf2 for progression to advanced MB, it is notable that when igf2 expression is analyzed in independent early MBs (Fig. 1C), a significant increase in igf2 transcript is observed in
20% of lesions. This frequency is similar to the
15% of mice that form advanced MB, suggesting that those early MBs that have induced igf2 transcription comprise the subset of lesions that will progress to advanced MB. Failure to induce igf2 transcription would cause these lesions to regress or remain benign. In summary, Igf2 may be an important malignancy associated factor required for the progression to advanced MB, making it an attractive therapeutic target.
Igf2 as a therapeutic target in MB. Strategies for blocking Igf2 signaling for the treatment of human tumors, such as MB, might include inhibition of Igf1R with small molecule inhibitors or receptor-blocking antibodies. Blocking Igf1R offers the advantage of preventing signaling by both Igf1 and Igf2, which stimulate the same signaling cascades. Whether Igf1 contributes to ptc1+/– MB formation is unclear. Increased igf1 expression is noted sporadically in ptc1+/– MBs (data not shown) but at levels much lower than those of igf2. We do not observe substitution for Igf2 by Igf1 in igf2–deficient ptc1+/– mice.
Our work shows the promise of specific targeting of the Igf2 ligand. We used a soluble Igf2R to inhibit MB cell proliferation, which presumably worked by sequestering Igf2. Recently, this same protein, produced from a transgene, was shown to inhibit tumor formation in a mouse model of intestinal adenoma associated with high Igf2 levels (31). Neutralizing antibodies specific to Igf2 could also achieve this end. Finally, manipulation of Igf-binding proteins (IgfBP) could block signaling by Igf ligands. For instance, IgfBP-3 can bind to and regulate the mitogenic activities of Igfs and inhibit their antiapoptotic effects (40).
Our data show a critical role for Igf2 in the progression and continued growth of MB in ptc1+/– mice. In human MB, dysregulation of the Shh pathway, often through loss of PTCH, is associated with a specific desmoplastic MB histology. Compared with classic MB, desmoplastic MBs have a distinct gene expression profile that includes increased expression of igf2 and Shh target genes (41). It is possible that Igf2 could hold similar importance in this class of human MB and that Igf2-directed therapies could provide clinical benefit.
| Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
We thank Drs. Argiris Efstratiadis and Jane Johnson for providing mouse strains, Dr. Susan McConnell for an in situ hybridization protocol, Dr. Bass Hassan for the sIgf2R plasmid, Dr. Anna Penn for RNA from Gli1- and Gli2-transfected fibroblasts, Natalia Snarskaya for assistance with microarray and reverse transcription-PCR experiments, and Hermie Manuel for assistance with mouse husbandry.
Received 6/10/08. Revised 7/24/08. Accepted 8/21/08.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J.-W. Theunissen and F. J. de Sauvage Paracrine Hedgehog Signaling in Cancer Cancer Res., August 1, 2009; 69(15): 6007 - 6010. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |